Expositor's Bible

THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS INTRODUCTION BY THE VERY REVEREND FREDERICK W. FARRAR, D.D., THE Second Book of Kings introduces us to the remarkable ministry of the Hebrew prophets. They spoke to their times with the authority of God and thus determined many of the policies of the Kingdoms of Judah and of Israel. This book gives the necessary historical background to understand the writings of Amos, Hosea, Micah, Isaiah, Jeremiah. It deals with the religious history of Israel from the prophetic standpoint. Dean Farrar’s gifts of keen ethical thinking and of picturesque writing are equally well shown in this exposition, as he interprets the teaching of social reform, of civic justice, of religious obligation, so urgently needing enlightened emphasis today. “Theories of inspiration which impaginate the Everlasting Spirit and make each verse a cluster of objectless and mechanical miracles, are not seriously believed by any one: the Bible itself abides in its endless power and unexhausted truth. All that is not of asbestos is being burned away by the restless fires of thought and criticism. That which remains is enough, and it is indestructible.” — BISHOP OF DERRY. CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. — Ahaziah Ben-Ahab of Israel (B.C. 855-854) CHAPTER 2. — Ascension of Elijah CHAPTER 3. — Elisha CHAPTER 4. — Invasion of Moab CHAPTER 5. — Elisha’s Miracles CHAPTER 6. — Story of Naaman CHAPTER 7. — Elisha and the Syrians CHAPTER 8. — Famine and the Siege CHAPTER 9. — Shunammite and Hazael CHAPTER 10. — Sons of Jehoshaphat CHAPTER 11. — Revolt of Jehu (B.C. 842) CHAPTER 12. — Jehu Established on the Throne (B.C. 842-814), CHAPTER 13. — Fresh Murders — The Extirpation of Baal-worship (B.C. 842) CHAPTER 14. — Athaliah (B.C. 842-836) — Joash of Judah (B.C. 836- 796) CHAPTER 15. — Amaziah of Judah (B.C. 796-783 [?]) CHAPTER 16. — Dynasty of Jehu — Jehoahaz (B.C. 814-797) Joash (B.C. 797-781) CHAPTER 17. — The Dynasty of Jehu (continued) — Jeroboam II. (B.C. 781-740) CHAPTER 18. — Amos and Hosea — Zachariah Ben-Jeroboam (B.C. 740) CHAPTER 19. — Uzziah of Judah (B.C. 783 [?]-737) — Jotham (B.C. 737-735) CHAPTER 20. — The Agony of the Northern Kingdom — Shallum, Menahem, Pekahiah, Pekah (B.C. 740-734) CHAPTER 21. — King Hoshea and the Fall of the Northern Kingdom (B.C. 734-725) CHAPTER 22. — The Reign of Ahaz (B.C. 735-715) CHAPTER 23. — Isaiah and Ahaz CHAPTER 24. — The Apostasies of Ahaz CHAPTER 25. — Hezekiah (B.C. 715-686) CHAPTER 26. — Hezekiah’s Sickness — The Babylonian Embassy CHAPTER 27. — Hezekiah and Assyria (B.C. 701) CHAPTER 28. — The Great Deliverance (B.C. 701) CHAPTER 29. — Manasseh (B.C. 686-641) CHAPTER 30. — Josiah (B.C. 639-608) CHAPTER 31. — Josiah’s Reformation CHAPTER 32. — The Death of Josiah (B.C. 608) CHAPTER 33. — Jehoahaz (B.C. 608) CHAPTER 34. — Jehoiakim (B.C. 608-597) CHAPTER 35. — Jehoiachin (B.C. 597) CHAPTER 36. — Zedekiah, the Last King of Judah (B.C. 597-586) CHAPTER 37. — Jeremiah and His Prophecies CHAPTER 38. — The Fall of Jerusalem (B.C. 586) CHAPTER 39. — Gedaliah (B.C. 586) EPILOGUE APPENDIX I. — The Kings of Assyria, and Some of Their Inscription APPENDIX II. — Inscription in the Tunnel of the Pool of Siloam APPENDIX III. — Was There a Golden Calf at Dan? APPENDIX IV. — Dates of the Kings of Israel and Judah, as Given by Kittel and Other Modern Critics CHAPTER 1. AHAZIAH BEN-AHAB OF ISRAEL. — <120101>2 KINGS 1:1-18. B.C. 855-854. “Ye know not of what spirit are ye.” — <420955>LUKE 9:55. “He is the mediator of a better covenant, which hath been enacted upon better promises.” — <580806>HEBREWS 8:6. AHAZIAH, the eldest son and successor of Ahab, has been called “the most shadowy of the Israelitish kings.”f1 He seems to have been in all respects one of the most weak, faithless, and deplorably miserable. He did but reign two years — perhaps in reality little more than one; but this brief space was crowded with intolerable disasters. Everything that he touched seemed to be marked out for ruin or failure, and in character he showed himself a true son of Jezebel and Ahab. What results followed the defeat of Ahab and Jehoshaphat at Ramoth- Gilead we are not told. The war must have ended in terms of peace of some kind — perhaps in the cession of Ramoth-Gilead; for Ahaziah does not seem to have been disturbed during this brief reign by any Syrian invasion. Nor were there any troubles on the side of Judah. Ahaziah’s sister was the wife of Jehoshaphat’s heir, and the good understanding between the two kingdoms was so closely cemented, that in both royal houses there was an identity of names — two Ahaziahs and two Jehorams. But even the Judaean alliance was marked with misfortune. Jehoshaphat’s prosperity and ambition, together with his firm dominance over Edom — in which country he had appointed a vassal, who was sometimes allowed the courtesy title of king (<112247>1 Kings 22:47; <120301>2 Kings 3:9 comp. 8:20) — led him to emulate Solomon by an attempt to revive the old maritime enterprise which had astonished Jerusalem with ivory, and apes, and peacocks imported from India. He therefore built “ships of Tarshish” at Ezion-Geber to sail to Ophir. They were called “Tarshish-ships,” because they were of the same build as those which sailed to Tartessus, in Spain, from Joppa. Ahaziah was to some extent associated with him in the enterprise. But it turned out even more disastrously than it had done in former times. So unskilled was the seamanship of those days among all nations except the Phoenicians, that the whole fleet was wrecked and shattered to pieces in the very harbor of Ezion-Geber before it had set sail. Ahaziah, whose affinity with the King of Tyre and possession of some of the western ports had given his subjects more knowledge of ships and voyages, then proposed to Jehoshaphat that the vessels should be manned with sailors from Israel as well as Judah. But Jehoshaphat was tired of a futile and expensive effort. He refused a partnership which might easily lead to complications, and on which the prophets of Jehovah frowned. It was the last attempt made by the Israelites to become merchants by sea as well as by land. Ahaziah’s brief reign was marked by one immense humiliation. David, who extended the dominion of the Hebrews in all directions, had smitten the Moabites, and inflicted on them one of the horrible atrocities against which the ill-instructed conscience of men in those days of ignorance did not revolt.f2 He had made the male warriors lie on the ground, and then, measuring them by lines, he put every two lines to death and kept one alive. After this the Moabites had continued to be tributaries. They had fallen to the share of the Northern Kingdom, and yearly acknowledged the suzerainty of Israel by paying a heavy tribute of the fleeces of a hundred thousand lambs and a hundred thousand rams. But now that the warrior Ahab was dead, and Israel had been crushed by the catastrophe at Ramoth- Gilead, Mesha, the energetic viceroy of Moab, seized his opportunity to revolt and to break from the neck of his people the odious yoke. The revolt was entirely successful. The sacred historian gives us no details, but one of the most priceless of modern archaeological discoveries has confirmed the Scriptural reference by securing and translating a fragment of Mesha’s own account of the annals of his reign. We have, in what is called “The Moabite Stone,” the memorial written in glorification of himself and of his god Chemosh, “the abomination of the children of Ammon,” by a contemporary of Ahab and Jehoshaphat.f3 It is the oldest specimen which we possess of Hebrew writing; perhaps the only specimen, except the Siloam inscription, which has come down to us from before the date of the Exile. It was discovered in 1878 by the German missionary Klein, amid the ruins of the royal city of Daibon (Dibon, <042130>Numbers 21:30), and was purchased for the Berlin Museum in 1879. Owing to all kinds of errors and intrigues, it did not remain in the hands of its purchaser, but was broken into fragments by the nomad tribe of Beni Hamide, from whom it was in some way obtained by M. Clermont-Ganneau. There is no ground for questioning its perfect genuineness, though the discovery of its value led to the forgery of a number of spurious and often indecent inscriptions. There can be no reasonable doubt that when we look at it we see before us the identical memorial of triumph which the Moabite emir erected in the days of Ahaziah on the bamah of Chemosh at Dibon, one of his chief towns. This document is supremely interesting, not only for its historical allusions, but also as an illustration of customs and modes of thought which have left their traces in the records of the people of Jehovah, as well as in those of the people of Chemosh.f4 Mesha tells us that his father reigned in Dibon for thirty years, and that he succeeded. He reared this stone to Chemosh in the town of Karcha, as a memorial of gratitude for the assistance which had resulted in the overthrow of all his enemies. Omri, King of Israel, had oppressed Moab many days, because Chemosh was wroth with his people. Ahaziah wished to oppress Moab as his father had done.

Load more