How Croatia Became the Most Water-Projects-Intensive Country in EU

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How Croatia Became the Most Water-Projects-Intensive Country in EU How Croatia became the most water-projects-intensive country in EU Executive overview of EU funded projects AUSTRIAN WEBINAR 14.12.2020 1 EU PROGRAM PERIOD 2014.-2020. STRUCTURAL INSTRUMENTS IN THE PROGRAM PERIOD 2014-2020 In the 2014-2014 programming period, the total financial envelope for the Republic of Croatia from the Structural Instruments is 10.676 billion euros. Of this, EUR 6.881 billion for investment in growth and development is available through OP Competitiveness and Cohesion and EUR 4.321 billion from the European Regional Development Fund and EUR 2.599 billion from the Cohesion Fund: 2014.-2020. Cohesion Fund 1.049.340.216 € Water Comunal reform European Regional Development Fund 215.000.000 € Flood protection 150.000.000 € 2 A) WATER SUPPLY AND WASTE WATER PROJECTS 3 OBLIGATIONS OF REPUBLIC OF CROATIA • Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC • Directive 98/83/EC on the quality of water intended for human consumption achieving the prescribed water quality in terms of microbiological indicators on public water supply systems in 70 identified water supply zones by the end of 2018 • Directive 91/271/EEC concerning urban waste water treatment construction of drainage and wastewater treatment systems in 281 agglomerations with a load of more than 2,000 ES with completion of all works by the end of 2023 with transition deadlines by 2018 and 2020 depending on the size of the agglomeration and receiver sensitivity • Revised implementation plan for water utilitiy directives an integral part of the documentation of the EU accession negotiations in Chapter 27. Environment. Transitional periods have also entered into the Treaty of Accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union • Multi annual program of construction of municipal water facilities 4 CURRENT STATUS OF APPROVAL – OPCC 14 -20 (1) Total eligible expenditure EU GRANT Number of projects (BN HRK) (BN HRK) APPROVED PROJECTS 20,09 14,07 60 IN PRE-APPROVAL PROCEDURE 1,69 1,17 5 TOTAL 21,78 15,24 65 5 CURRENT STATUS OF APPROVAL – OPCC 14-20 (2) County Projects in implementation Projects in approval Total planned value of investment (BN HRK) (7) - Osijek, RVS Osijek, Valpovo-Belišće, Đakovo, Našice, Beli Osijek - Baranja - 1,58 Manastir, Semeljci (7) - Vrbovec, Jastrebarsko, Rugvica-Dugo Selo, Velika Gorica, Zagreb - 2,4 RVS Zagreb Istok, Zaprešić, Ivanić Grad (6) - Split-Solin, Kaštela-Trogir, Imotski, Otok-Trilj, Jelsa- Split – Dalmatia - 3,68 Vrboska, Sinj Primorje – Gorski (4) - Krk, Novi Vinodolski, Rijeka, Cres-Lošinj - 3,03 Kotar Sisak - Moslavina (3) - Petrinja, Novska, Kutina - 0,83 Varaždin (3) - Varaždin, Varaždinske Toplice, Ivanec - 0,91 Koprivnica – Križevci (3) - Koprivnica, Križevci, Đurđevac - 0,95 Virovitica – Podravina (3) - Virovitica, Pitomača, Slatina - 0,55 (3) - Pleternica, Požega, Lipik-Pakrac Požega - Slavonia - 0,46 Šibenik – Knin (3) - Vodice-Tribunj-Srima, Šibenik, Betina-Murter - 0,6 6 CURRENT STATUS OF APPROVAL – OPCC 14-20 (3) County( Projects in implementation Projects in approval Total planned value of investment (BN HRK) Vukovar – Syrmia (3) - Vukovar, Vinkovci, Županja 0,82 Istria (3) - Rovinj, Poreč, Umag (1) – Pula Sjever 1,3 Dubrovnik – Neretva (3) - Dubrovnik, Ploče, Metković 1,2 Zadar (2) – Nin-Privlaka-Vrsi, Zadar (1) – Biograd na Moru 1,32 Međimurje (2) - Donja Dubrava, Mursko Središće 0,37 Krapina - Zagorje (1) - Zabok – Zlatar 0,48 Karlovac (1) - Karlovac – Duga Resa 0,33 Bjelovar – Bilogora (1) - Bjelovar 0,2 Lika – Senj (1) - Novalja (1) - Plitvička Jezera 0,56 Brod – Posavina (1) – Nova Gradiška (1) – Slavonski Brod 0,61 TOTAL 60 PROJECTS IN IMPLEMENTATION 4 PROJECTS IN APPROVAL 21,7 7 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PROGRESS – OPCC 14 – 20 SECONDARY CONTRACTING OPCC 2014 - 2020 22 000 000 000 200,00% 183,79% 179,52% 20 000 000 000 180,00% 18 000 000 000 160,00% 140,95% 16 000 000 000 140,00% 14 000 000 000 120,00% 12 000 000 000 93,06% 100,00% HRK 10 000 000 000 80,00% 8 000 000 000 49,82% 60,00% 6 000 000 000 40,00% 4 000 000 000 25,34% 16,16% 2 000 000 000 8,22% 20,00% 0 0 0 0,00% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Ukupni prihvatljivi trošak (HRK) Kumulativno Ugovorenost % 8 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PROBLEMS (1) The biggest problem in the realization of EU projects is the procurement procedures. The new Law on Public Procurement tried to meet the Employers and shorten the procedure itself, but it should be noted that the implementation identified a number of problems that slow down this procedure: the preliminary consultation procedure did not produce the desired result: instead of tenderers seeking clarification of tender conditions or technical specifications for the purpose of market research and simpler implementation of the procurement procedure and obtaining better offers, professional complainants on behalf of potential tenderers seek only certain parts of the documentation to which they will file appeals; Frequent filing of appeals about documentation (outside the deadline for appeals) of the procurement, which prolongs the bidding time. In some procurement procedures, new appeals to the tender dossier (TD) occur even after the State Commision (SC) Decision has been adopted and the amendments to the TD have been partially amended and the new deadline for submission of the bid has been determined, which further extends the bidding time. the TD appeal fee is 700 EUR regardless of the value of the procurement Frequent extension of the deadline for submission of the offer by the Employer - NEW TREND frequent filing of appeals against the award decision which prolongs the duration of the procurement process; An appeal can be made by an economic entity, regardless of whether it has a legal interest (eg TD complaint - Appellant is a company registered for: preparing meals, drinks and beverages for consumption elsewhere with or without service production of perfumes and toiletries etc.) Public Procurement duration (from publication to execution of the award Decision): The average duration of the public procurement procedure for works is 9-10 months The average duration of the procurement process for services is 6-7 months 9 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PROBLEMS (2) LAW PROVIDED PERIOD FROM PUBLICATION TO OPENING OF BID IS 35 DAYS (MINIMUM) FOR OPEN PROCEDURE WITH LARGE VALUE Project Donja Dubrava – TD appeal (sewage) • Estimated tender value: 15.923.815,79 EUR • 8.6.2018. – Initial tender notice released • 10 TD APPEALS– 9 dismissed as unfounded / untimely • 16.4.2019. – Tender opening • Conclusion: From Tender Notice till Tender opening 10,5 months passed Project Mursko Središće – TD appeal (sewage) • Estimated tender value: 15.001.434,21 EUR • 12.11.2018. - Initial tender notice released • 6 TD APPEALS – ALL dismissed as unfounded / untimely • 16.4.2019. - Tender opening • Conclusion: From Tender Notice till Tender opening 5 months passed Project Rijeka – TD appeal (sewage) • Estimated tender value : 106.952.368,42 HRK • 3.12.2018. - Initial tender notice released • 3 TD APPEALS – ALL dismissed as unfounded / untimely • Predicted date of tender opening - unknown • Conclusion: From Tender Notice till (potential) Tender opening 9 months passed 9 mjeseci (and still counting) 10 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PROBLEMS (3) LAW PROVIDED PERIOD OF IMPLEMENTATION FROM PUBLICATION TO EXECUTION OF AWARD DECISION IS 80 DAYS (MINIMUM) FOR OPEN PROCEDURE WITH LARGE VALUE Project Jastrebarsko – duration of procurement (WWTP) • Estimated tender value : 4.124.373,03 EUR • 20.4.2018 - Initial tender notice released • TD APPEAL – Adopted (33 days for SC Decision) • 9.8.2018. – Tender opening • 30.10.2018. – 1st Award decision • APPEAL ON 1st AWARD DECISION – Adopted (73 days for SC Decision) • 12.4.2019. – 2nd Award decision • APPEAL ON 2nd AWARD DECISION– dismissed on 18.6.2019. (67 days for SC Decision) • Conclusion : 14 months duration of procurement Projekct Varaždin – duration of procurement (WWTP) • Estimated tender value : 162.448.000 HRK • 28.5.2018 - Initial tender notice released • 24.8.2018. – Tender opening • 21.12.2018. – 1st Award decision • APPEAL ON 1st AWARD DECISION – Adopted (56 days for SC Decision) • 10.4.2019. – 2nd Award decision • APPEAL ON 2nd AWARD DECISION– Adopted (65 days for SC Decision) • 16.7.2019. – 3rd Award decision • Conclusion : 14 months duration of procurement 11 INCREASING OF PROJECT COSTS MOST RECENT PROBLEM: SIGNIFICANT INCREASE OF PROJECTS COSTS (application costs ≠ tender costs) Current statistics: 1. Sewage system – 28,5% above the estimated tender budget 2. Sewage system Dunav River Basin – 21% above the estimated tender budget 3. Sewage system Adriatic River Basin – 46% above the estimated tender budget 4. WWTP – within the estimated tender budget 12 PROBLEMS IN CONTRACTING AND IMPLEMENTATION Problems: Delayed award decision making due to increased bids Delaying award decision making because of fear of financial corrections Slow dynamics of work execution than planned (all projects) Bankruptcy of contractors (Vukovar and Osijek projects), Financial corrections as a result of ex-post control of the procurement process. Measures: HV and MZOE employers in the beneficiaries evaluation commitee Ammendment of Grant Contracts, in justified cases Transfer of knowledge in order to avoid possible financial corrections Daily meetings 13 PLANNED CONTRACTING IN FOLLOWING PERIOD SECONDARY CONTRACTING – TOTAL ELIGIBLE COST PERIOD: 2021 - 2023 25 000 000 000 120,00% 20 454 742 863 20 944 850 524 100,00% 20 000 000 000 16 037 150 587 80,00% 15 000 000 000 60,00% HRK 10 557 663 302 10 000 000 000
Recommended publications
  • Dalmatia Tourist Guide
    Vuk Tvrtko Opa~i}: County of Split and Dalmatia . 4 Tourist Review: Publisher: GRAPHIS d.o.o. Maksimirska 88, Zagreb Tel./faks: (385 1) 2322-975 E-mail: [email protected] Editor-in-Chief: Elizabeta [unde Ivo Babi}: Editorial Committee: Zvonko Ben~i}, Smiljana [unde, Split in Emperor Diocletian's Palace . 6 Marilka Krajnovi}, Silvana Jaku{, fra Gabriel Juri{i}, Ton~i ^ori} Editorial Council: Mili Razovi}, Bo`o Sin~i}, Ivica Kova~evi}, Stjepanka Mar~i}, Ivo Babi}: Davor Glavina The historical heart of Trogir and its Art Director: Elizabeta [unde cathedral . 9 Photography Editor: Goran Morovi} Logo Design: @eljko Kozari} Layout and Proofing: GRAPHIS Language Editor: Marilka Krajnovi} Printed in: Croatian, English, Czech, and Gvido Piasevoli: German Pearls of central Dalmatia . 12 Translators: German – Irena Bad`ek-Zub~i} English – Katarina Bijeli}-Beti Czech – Alen Novosad Tourist Map: Ton~i ^ori} Printed by: Tiskara Mei}, Zagreb Cover page: Hvar Port, by Ivo Pervan Ivna Bu}an: Biblical Garden of Stomorija . 15 Published: annually This Review is sponsored by the Tourist Board of the County of Split and Dalmatia For the Tourist Board: Mili Razovi}, Director Prilaz bra}e Kaliterna 10, 21000 Split Gvido Piasevoli: Tel./faks: (385 21) 490-032, 490-033, 490-036 One flew over the tourists' nest . 18 Web: www.dalmacija.net E-mail: [email protected] We would like to thank to all our associates, tourist boards, hotels, and tourist agencies for cooperation. @eljko Kuluz: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or repro- Fishing and fish stories .
    [Show full text]
  • Ruralna Društva U Sjeni Metropole: Zagrebačka Županija
    UDK 316.334.55 prethodno priopćenje ruralna društva u sjeni metropole: zagrebačka županija maja štambuk Na području Županije zagrebačke, utemeljene 1992. ima dvadeset općina i jedan grad. Dakle, većina od institut za društvena dvadeset naselja u neposrednoj okolici Zagreba po­ istraživanja, sljednjom su upravnom reformom stekla status zagreb, hrvatska općinskog središta i izišla iz anonimnosti, zajedno sa svojom (isto tako) ruralnom okolicom. Izuzetak su otprije gospodarski jača i napučenija mala gradska središta. Tek sada za ove ruralne zajednice nastupa razdoblje gospodarske i kulturne potvrde, napor da se oblikuje sa potrebitim elementima prepoznatljivo lokalno društvo na periferiji gospodarski i kulturno jakog, nacionalnog gradskog središta. Neke općine (1994) 13 aktualna tema već su profilirane u mnogim aspektima. No većina općina u Zagrebačkoj županiji male su ruralno- agrarne općine. O njihovim obilježjima na temelju objavljenih popisnih podataka pretežito ćemo govo­ (1/2) 13-25 riti u ovom tekstu. Namjera nam je da time skromno pripomognemo oblikovanju (mikro) identiteta koji primljeno listopada 1994. je u temelju razvitka malih ruralnih društava. > Zagrebačka županija, dijelom nekadašnji gradski "prsten", dragocjeni sociologija sela 32 je prostor u neposrednoj okolici metropole prema kojemu metropola tek mora istražiti podesan i uspješan pristup i pronaći pravu mjeru uzajamnog "iskorištavanja". Interesi grada i interesi okolne županije ne preklapaju se u potpunosti, pa za kompromisna rješenja mnogih pitanja, naročito s mo­ trišta dugoročna razvitka, valja izraditi stručne podloge. Zagrebačka županija obuhvaća prostor između najistočnije općine Far- kaševac i najzapadnije općine Sošice u Žumberku na samoj slovenskoj granici. Na sjeveru su općine Hruševec Kupljenski, Jakovlje, Sv. Ivan Ze­ lina, Preseka. Najjužniji njezin dio dolazi do općinskog područja Pisaro- vine.
    [Show full text]
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROUGH GUIDE To
    ROUGH GUIDES THE ROUGH GUIDE to Croatia CROATIA 0 50 km SLOVENIA HUNGARY ITALY Varaždin Pécs LJUBLJANA 1 Trieste Bjelovar ZAGREB 2 Drava Slatina Rijeka Kutina Karlovac Sava 3 Našice Osijek Slunj Vinkovci Danube Krk PulaCres 4 N Rab Banja Luka Pag Sava Tuzla BOSNIA - HERCEGOVINA SERBIA Zadar Ancona SARAJEVO Vodice 5 Split Imotski ADRIATIC SEA ITALY Hvar Mostar 1 Zagreb Vis 2 Inland Croatia Korculaˇ MONTENEGRO 3 Istria Ston 4 The Kvarner Gulf 6 5 Dalmatia Dubrovnik Podgorica 6 Dubrovnik and around About this book Rough Guides are designed to be good to read and easy to use. The book is divided into the following sections and you should be able to find whatever you need in one of them. The colour section gives you a feel for Croatia, suggesting when to go and what not to miss, and includes a full list of contents. Then comes basics, for pre-departure information and other practicalities. The guide chapters cover Croatia’s regions in depth, each starting with a highlights panel, introduction and a map to help you plan your route. The contexts section fills you in on history, folk and rock music and books, while individual colour inserts introduce the country’s islands and cuisine, and language gives you an extensive menu reader and enough Croatian to get by. The book concludes with all the small print, including details of how to send in updates and corrections, and a comprehensive index. This fifth edition published April 2010 The publishers and authors have done their best to ensure the accuracy and currency of all the information in The Rough Guide to Croatia, however, they can accept no responsibility for any loss, injury, or inconvenience sustained by any traveller as a result of information or advice contained in the guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Villa Sadan Region: Hvar Sleeps: 8 - 10
    Villa Sadan Region: Hvar Sleeps: 8 - 10 Overview Surrounded by luscious green countryside, luxurious 320 sqm Villa Sadan is located on the slopes of the mountains in the village of Pitve on Hvar Island. With stunning views of the sea and the magnificent mountains from the village, it is a secluded paradise for large families and groups of friends sleeping up to 10 people. With its high position in Pitve, you can enjoy the fresh cool breeze and comfortable nights even in summer months! The beautiful island of Hvar, known for the most hours of sunshine in the whole of Croatia, for lavender fields and fantastic wine, will provide magical lasting holiday memories. The pool and terrace area is a child’s dream. You feel like you are in the middle of no-where and can play games and laugh and shout as much as you like without disturbing anyone! There is a wonderful covered lounge and dining area next to the pool with barbecue. It is such a wonderful spot for relaxing and enjoying the awe-inspiring views, away from the stress of everyday life! The villa guarantees a perfect holiday with family or friends. The stylish, open plan living area is vast with a massive squishy corner sofa and tv, a kitchen perfect for preparing delicious dinners and a wonderful inside dining table and chairs. The divine stone walls and feature walls make this feel very welcoming and calming. It is elegantly designed. If the young ones are too excited to get out of the pool or want a late-night swim, the adults can sit very comfortably in the lounge area and watch through the floor to ceiling windows.
    [Show full text]
  • Split-Riviera-HR-SLO-PL-RU-CZ.Pdf
    HR SLO PL RU CZ Kroz upečatljiv spoj S presenetljivo kombinacijo Przez imponujące połączenie Впечатляющее соединение Díky působivému spojení UNESCO-m zaštićene zaščitene arhitekturne chronionego przez UNESCO строительного наследия под UNESCO-em chráněným graditeljske baštine i raskoši dediščine UNESCA in razkošja dorobku architektonicznego i защитой ЮНЕСКО, роскоши architektonickým dědictvím a tradicije, slikovitih plaža tradicije, slikovitih plaž, uroków tradycji, malowniczych традиции, живописных vznešenosti tradice, malebným uronjenih u bistro plavetnilo potopljenih v jasno modrino plaż zanurzonych w пляжей, погруженных plážím, ponořených do jasné Jadrana i kulturnih poslastica Jadrana, in kulturnih poslastic, przejrzystym błękicie Adriatyku в прозрачную синеву modře Jadranu a kulturním koje su tek točka na »i« ki so pravzaprav pika na »i« oraz kulturowych smakołyków, Адриатики, культурных delikatesám, které jsou jen izvornom i gotovo filmskom izvornemu in skoraj filmskemu będących kropką nad »i« деликатес, являющихся tečkou na »i« na původní ozračju svakodnevice ovoga vzdušju vsakdanjika tega kraja, oryginalnej i niemalże filmowej глазурей для оригинальной a téměř filmové atmosféře kraja, Splitska rivijera nudi ono Splitska riviera ponuja tisto atmosfery życia codziennego и почти фильмовой všedního dne tohoto kraje, najbolje od Mediterana. najboljše od Mediterana. tego regionu, Riwiera Splitska атмосферы повседневной nabízí Splitská riviéra to ma do zaoferowana to co жизни этого края, Ривьера nejlepší ze Středomoří. Pridodamo li nizu
    [Show full text]
  • Of Geographical Names
    Index of Geographical Names Adriatic 12, 89, 92, 152, 166–167, 235–236 Blidinje 131 Adriatic coast 92, 96, 110, 232 Blučina near Brno (Czech Republic) 130 Adriatic Sea 17, 105, 141, 152, 174 Bohinjska Srednja Vas 175 Albania 15, 91–92, 102, 152, 174 Bosna, river 30, 186, 236 Aleksinac–Moravac in Serbia 212 Bosnia 27, 90, 105, 142 Ališići near Prijedor 108, 111, 136, 142 Bosnia and Herzegovina 27, 126 Ališići–Klis 202 Bošnjaci (near Županja) 96, 111, 137, 142, 213, 222 Alpine regions 130, 152, 159, 167, 234 Bračića Podvornice (Biskupija), see Biskupija–Bračića Podvornice Alps 153, 230 Brestovac, see Požeški Brestovac Alsórajk 90, 130, 158 Brezje pri Zrečah 91 Aquileia 133, 222 Bribir (near Skradin) 10–11, 30, 123, 134–135, 186, 222–223 Arnautovići, see Mile Bribir–Dol 10 Augsburg 78 Bribir–Groblje 112, 213 Austria 1, 24, 92, 99, 107, 126, 159 Bribir–Novi Put 107, 135, 142, 212 Bribir–“Pod Tjemenom”, see Bribir–Tjeme, Bribir–Groblje Bagruša (Petoševci) 27, 64, 70, 143 Bribir–Tjeme 10, 111, 142 Bajagić 99, 142 Bribir–Vratnice 25, 52, 58, 70, 78–79, 83, 95, 102, 107, 115, 127, 135, 142, Bajuvar 103 159, 186, 212, 233 Balaton, lake in Hungary 31, 90, 92, 102–103, 124, 166 Brlog (Lika) 187 Balkan 130, 153 Brnaze (near Sinj) 10, 12, 111, 135, 142, 222 Baltine Bare (Gomjenica) 105, 107 Brod na Savi, see Slavonski Brod 110, 142, 236 Baranya (Baranja) 31, 232 Brodski Drenovac 100, 102, 124, 137, 144, 152 Begovača, see Biljane Donje 10, 13, 23–25, 37, 44, 47, 49, 52–53, 61, Bugojno 90–91, 123, 142, 186, 202, 236 64, 70, 79, 83, 86, 93–95, 102–104,
    [Show full text]
  • Split & Central Dalmatia
    © Lonely Planet Publications 216 Split & Central Dalmatia Central Dalmatia is the most action-packed, sight-rich and diverse part of Croatia, with dozens of castles, fascinating islands, spectacular beaches, dramatic mountains, quiet ports and an emerg- ing culinary scene, not to mention Split’s Diocletian Palace and medieval Trogir (both Unesco World Heritage sites). In short, this part of Croatia will grip even the most picky visitor. The region stretches from Trogir in the northwest to Ploče in the southeast. Split is its largest city and a hub for bus and boat connections along the Adriatic coast. The rugged DALMATIA DALMATIA 1500m-high Dinaric Range provides the dramatic background to the region. SPLIT & CENTRAL SPLIT & CENTRAL Diocletian’s Palace is a sight like no other (a Roman ruin and the living soul of Split) and it would be a cardinal Dalmatian sin to miss out on the sights, bars, restaurants and general buzz inside it. The Roman ruins in Solin are altogether a more quiet, pensive affair, while Trogir is a tranquil city that’s preserved its fantastic medieval sculpture and architecture. Then there is Hvar Town, the region’s most popular destination, richly ornamented with Renais- sance architecture, good food, a fun atmosphere and tourists – who are in turn ornamented with deep tans, big jewels and shiny yachts. Let’s not forget the coastline: you can choose from the slender and seductive Zlatni Rat on Brač, wonderful beaches in Brela on the Makarska Riviera, secluded coves on Brač, Šolta and Vis, or gorgeous (and nudie) beaches on the Pakleni Islands off Hvar.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia's Cities
    National Development Strategy Croatia 2030 Policy Note: Croatia’s Cities: Boosting the Sustainable Urban Development Through Smart Solutions August 2019 Contents 1 Smart Cities – challenges and opportunities at European and global level .......................................... 3 1.1 Challenges .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Opportunities .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Best practices ............................................................................................................................. 6 2 Development challenges and opportunities of Croatian cities based on their territorial capital .......... 7 3 Key areas of intervention and performance indicators ....................................................................... 23 3.1 Key areas of intervention (KAI)............................................................................................... 23 3.2 Key performance indicators (KPI) ........................................................................................... 24 4 Policy mix recommendations ............................................................................................................. 27 4.1 Short-term policy recommendations (1-3 years) ...................................................................... 27 4.2 Medium-term policy recommendations (4-7 years) ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ANNEXES REGIONAL FILES VOLUME 2 PART I EASTERN SLAVONIA 1 MARCH 2001 II CONTENTS ETHNIC STRUCTURES 1 Eastern Slavonia 3 Tenja 4 Antin 5 Dalj 6 Berak 7 Bogdanovci 8 Šarengrad 9 Ilok 10 Tompojevci 11 Bapska 12 Tovarnik 13 Sotin 14 Lovas 15 Tordinci 16 Vukovar 17 WITNESS STATEMENTS TENJA 19 Annex 1: Witness Statement of M.K. 21 Annex 2: Witness Statement of R.J. 22 Annex 3: Witness Statement of I.K. (1) 24 Annex 4: Witness Statement of J.P. 29 Annex 5: Witness Statement of L.B. 34 Annex 6: Witness Statement of P.Š. 35 Annex 7: Witness Statement of D.M. 37 Annex 8: Witness Statement of M.R. 39 Annex 9: Witness Statement of M.M. 39 Annex 10: Witness Statement of M.K. 41 Annex 11: Witness Statement of I.I.* 42 Annex 12: Witness Statement of Z.B. 52 Annex 13: Witness Statement of A.M. 54 Annex 14: Witness Statement of J.S. 56 Annex 15: Witness Statement of Z.M. 58 Annex 16: Witness Statement of J.K. 60 IV Annex 17: Witness Statement of L.R. 63 Annex 18: Witness Statement of Đ.B. 64 WITNESS STATEMENTS DALJ 67 Annex 19: Witness Statement of J.P. 69 Annex 20: Witness Statement of I.K. (2) 71 Annex 21: Witness Statement of A.K. 77 Annex 22: Witness Statement of H.S.
    [Show full text]
  • “International Handbook on Green Local Fiscal Policy Models”
    “International handbook on green local fiscal policy models” LOCAL Policies for GREEN Energy – LOCAL4GREEN 1 Meritxell Bennasar Casasa Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Background. Description Local Policies for Green Energy Project 1.2. About this document: main objectives and characteristics of this manual 1.3. Target Groups: Local authorities Consultants specializing in public management Decision makers of national and regional authorities Other interested parties in the promotion of renewable energy sources 1.4. Partners 2. Description of the 9 Mediterranean countries 2.1. Albania Lezha Vau i Dejës Kukës 2.2. Croatia Brdovec Jastrebarsko Klanjec Dugo Selo Pregrada 2.3. Cyprus Lakatamia Nicosia Aradippou 2.4. Greece Amariou Edessa Farsala Kozani Lagadas Leros Malevizi Milos Pilea-Hortiatis Platania Sithonia Tanagra Thermi Volvi 2.5. Italy 2 2.6. Malta San Lawrenz Sannat Kercem 2.7. Portugal Albufeira Alcoutim Aljezur Castro Marim Faro Lagoa Lagos Loulé Monchique Olhão Portimão São Brás de Alportel Silves Tavira Vila do Bispo Vila Real de Santo António 2.8. Slovenia Grosuplje Ivančna Gorica Kamnik Kočevje Kranj Križevci Lenart Trebnje 2.9. Spain Dolores Muro d’Alcoi Pedreguer Alfàs del Pi Altea Callosa d’en Sarrià Almussafes Godella Quart de Poblet Alaquàs Xeresa 3. Comparative study of national regulations 3.1. Albania 3.1.1. Albanian Tax System 3.1.2. Description of Fiscal Policies of Pilot Municipalities 3.2. Croatia 3.2.1. Croatian Tax Sytem 3.2.2. Description of Fiscal Policies of Pilot Municipalities 3.3. Cyprus 3.3.1. Cypriot Tax Sytem 3 3.3.2. Description of Fiscal Policies of Pilot Municipalities 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Golden Valley – Heaven for Food and Wine Lovers with More Than 30 Wineries and Forts
    TRIP IDEAS fact! Romans called this region Vallis Aurea (the Golden Valley) TZ PSZ The Golden Valley – heaven for food and wine lovers With more than 30 wineries and forts. There are numerous legends prov- three wine roads, Požega-Slavonia ing that this has been a region rich in County offers a unique wine and wine since the ancient times. There is a story that Veuve Clicquot, the widow food experience that conquered the 19th century world with her champagne, visited Pleter- nica on her way to Petrograd and was Fertile fields of Slavonia have al- so thrilled by the rolling hills she saw, ways fed the inhabitants of Požega- that upon her return to Champagne she Slavonia County, and as early as the sent vine roots to the people of Pleter- TZ PSZ Roman times it got the name of Val- nica. She was later honoured by having lis Aurea or the Golden Valley. This not only local wines named after her - a Aurelius’ wine, found in what used to be County is a must visit place for the lov- Riesling, which is a graševina coupage, Roman woods. ers of wine, especially graševina. More a white pinot, and local grappa, but also This region, however, is not famous only than 30 wineries and three wine roads a hill. They are called Klikun, the name for its wine – the food is exquisite as (Požega – Pleternica Vineyards, Kutje- similar to the way locals pronounced the well, and you will not stay hungry. Pre- vo Vineyards and Pakrac Vineyards) widow’s last name Clicquot.
    [Show full text]