Wipro Business Travel Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wipro Business Travel Study Wipro: Business Travel Carbon Footprint Study Air Travel, FY 14-15 and FY 15-16 Project Methodology 1. Business Goal 2. Organizational 3. Operational 4. Data Collection Definition* Boundary Setting* Boundary Setting* 7. GHG 6. Emission Factor 8. Interpretation Inventorying Selection/ 5. Data Analysis (Baseline) Development 11. GHG 9. Mitigation 10. Estimating Mitigation Scenario GHG Mitigation 12. Reporting Recommendation Modelling Potential s * defined by ‘The Greenhouse Gas Protocol’: Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, World Resources Institute (WRI) World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) 1. Business Goal Definition Estimate GHG emissions from Wipro’s Air Travel activities and evaluate mitigation alternatives as decision support for development of its Corporate GHG Mitigation Roadmap 2. Organizational Boundary Definition Wipro Wipro Business Wipro Eco Wipro Infotech Technologies Process Services Energy Services (outside Wipro Ltd. (within (outside (outside boundary) boundary) boundary) boundary) * based on 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. 2 - Energy, Chapter 3: Mobile Combustion 3. Operational Boundary Definition Corporate Scope 1 Scope 2 Scope 3 Business Air Emissions Emissions Emissions Travel Emissions • Owned Vehicle • Electricity •Electricity AT&C Emissions •Aircraft Fuel Combustion Emissions Generation Emissions (Office Electricity) •Capital Goods Emissions Manufacturing Emissions •Fuel Production (Supply- Chain) Emissions * based on 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. 2 - Energy, Chapter 3: Mobile Combustion 4. Data Collection & 5. Data Analysis Flight Distance Flight Distance Calculation (~ Categorization: Short-Long Activity Data Questionnaire Activity Data Quality 11,000 pairs, ~ 4,000 newly Haul for Domestic, Short- Design and Collection Assessment and Verification researched) Medium-Long for International Passenger-km totalization by Passenger-km totalization by Flight Distance Category Passenger-km totalization by Sectors (International, within Sectors (International Determining list of Airlines Airline Domestic-India, Domestic- – Short, Medium, Long, USA, Others) Domestic - Short, Long) 6. Emission Factor Development Convert to best-case per-passenger emission factors for finite distances for Repeat for additional finite distances per LTO and Cruise Mode Emissions (Total) every aircraft model model, and replicate for each aircraft for all aircraft models (using max PAX Capacity and Load- model Factor of 1) Calculate per-passenger emissions for finite distance for each airline as sum of weighted LTO & Cruise-mode emissions Calculate weighting factor based on % of Repeat for adiditonal finited distances aircraft model count vs. total fleet count for each domestic airline (account for weighted-avg. airline passenger capacity, airline-wide of airline passenger load factor, and PAX to Freight Ratio) * based on 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. 2 - Energy, Chapter 3: Mobile Combustion Assumptions • One passenger per booking entry • Same airline for all legs of multi-stop flights • GHG mitigation through substitution of Multi-Leg Roundtrip-Flights with Non-Stop Roundtrip-Flights was simple for a roundtrip flight with even-number of legs (eg. 4-leg flight: Mumbai-Dubal-London- Dubai-London) wherein the ‘destination’ was the middle city (i.e. London). The process of determining the ‘destination’ for a roundtrip-flight with odd-number of legs (eg. 3-leg flight: Mumbai-Dubai- Geneva-Mumbai) was: identify the city following the ‘mid-point’ in the even-number sequence (eg. mid-point of 4 city trip would be 2nd-city, the subsequent city would be the 3rd-city in the sequence – i.e. Geneva. • 100% economy class seats • Employee Count: 1,20,000 • Additional Employee Time per Flight Leg (Pre-Departure, Transit, Post-Arrival Time) : 3 hours/flight • For Airlines wherein fleet composition and operation data were not available, the corresponding ‘average’ emission factor for the Sector was applied (eg. use of Avg. International Short Haul Emission Factor (kg CO2e/pass-km) for Ravn Alaska Airline’s International Short Haul Flights) Materiality and Exclusions • Scope 1 Emissions from Owned Vehicle use to support Air Travel activities not considered material to footprint and hence excluded • Scope 2 Emissions attributable to Office Electricity Use (for Air Travel Management Operations) not considered material to footprint and hence excluded • Scope 3 Emissions attributable to AT&C Losses resulting from Office Electricity Use (for Air Travel Management Operations) not considered material to footprint and hence excluded • Scope 3 Emissions from Train Travel in the USA excluded • Flights shorter than 100 kms excluded (considered to be data error) • Flights costing less than INR 200 excluded (considered to be data error) Definitions Flight Distance Category Distance Range (km) International – Short Haul < 2,000 International – Medium Haul > 2,000 to < 5,000 International – Long Haul > 5,000 Domestic – Short Haul < 500 Domestic – Long Haul > 500 Data Analysis: Know your Air Travel Metrics Distance Metrics (Million Passenger-kms) FY 14-15 FY 15-16 1,269.8 Total Distance 1,134.4 932.9 International 809.9 336.9 Domestic 324.4 161.4 Domestic - India 174.3 160.3 Domestic - USA 136.4 15.2 Domestic - Others 13.7 Flight Metrics (Nos. of Flights) FY 14-15 FY 15-16 4,98,32 Total Flights 4,68,67 7 5 2,02,122 International 1,79,201 2,96,205 Domestic 2,89,474 1,59,166 Domestic - India 1,73,147 1,13,763 Domestic - USA 96,636 23,276 Domestic - Others 19,691 5 Longest 5 Shortest International Flights International Flights km km Auckland, New Heathrow, Tallinn, USSR Zealand 18,364.2 United Kingdom 101.4 Helsinki, Finland Auckland, New London, United Geneva, 18,336.8 106.6 Lyon, France Zealand Kingdom Switzerland Bonaire, Singapore, Netherlands Cotonou, Benin Lagos, Nigeria 18,287.5 Singapore 107.2 Antilles Lisbon, Portugal 18177.93 Sydney, Australia Porto, Portugal 109.9 Vego, Spain Guangzhou, Perth, Australia Hongkong 18138.05 Toronto, Canada China 128.5 5 Longest Domestic- 5 Shortest Domestic- India Flights India Flights km km Delhi, India Port Blair, India Baroda, India 102.3 Ahmedabad, 2,483.5 India Bangalore, Dibrugarh, Bombay, India India 2,418.7 India 124.1 Pune, India Amritsar, India Kochi, India Calicut, India Coimbatore, 2,408.6 131.7 India Guwahati, Kochi, India Jammu, India 142.6 Srinagar, India 2,385.4 India Dibrugarh, Dehradun, Chandigarh, 2,368.7 Pune, India India Uttarakhand 143.2 India FY 14-15 FY 15-16 ~4 Flights Flights Per Employee ~4 Flights 10.6 9.45 Thousand Pax - km Distance Per Employee Thousand Pax - km 1.51 1.35 Million Hours Time Spent in Air Million Hours 3.01 Total Travel Time* 2.76 Million Hours Million Hours 12.6 Air time Per Employee 11.3 Hours Hours Total Travel Time Per 25.1 23.0 Hours Employee Hours *including pre-flight, post-flight, and transit time Most Favoured International Airlines (flight count-based) Most Favoured International Airlines Most Favoured International Airlines FY 2014-2015 FY 2015-2016 Emirates Emirates British Airways 14% Etihad Airways 19% 26% Lufthansa 24% Lufthansa 11% Singapore Airlines British Airways Etihad Airways 2% 11% Singapore Airlines 3% 3% 3% 10% Jet Airways 3% Qatar Airways 5% 5% 9% Qatar Airways 6% 8% 7% Jet Airways 6% 8% 9% 8% Air India Air India United Airlines United Airlines Cathay Pacific Airways KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Others Others Most Favoured Domestic Airlines (flight count-based) Most Favoured Domestic Airlines Most Favoured Domestic Airlines FY 2014-2015 FY 2015-2016 Jet Airways Indigo Airlines Indigo Airlines Jet Airways 14% 18% United Airlines 11% United Airlines 2%2% 25% 2% 3% 4% Air India 3% American Airlines 5% 7% 18% Delta Airlines Delta Airlines 5% American Airlines 8% Air India 6% 22% 8% 9% 10% Spice Jet Southwest Airlines 9% 9% US Airways Spice Jet Southwest Airlines US Airways Go Air Go Air Others Others Data Analysis: Know your Baseline GHG Emissions Corporate Business Travel (Air Travel) Emissions (‘000 Tonnes CO2e) FY 14-15 Scope 3 – Aircraft Scope 3 – Fuel Scope 3 – Aircraft Category Total Fuel Combustion Supply Chain Manufacturing International Air 100.7 15.0 7.38 123.2 Travel Domestic Air Travel 38.9 5.95 2.12 46.9 Total 139.6 21.0 9.51 170.1 Corporate Business Travel (Air Travel) Emissions (‘000 Tonnes CO2e) FY 15-16 Scope 3 – Aircraft Scope 3 – Fuel Scope 3 – Aircraft Category Total Fuel Combustion Supply Chain Manufacturing International Air 88.6 13.1 6.4 108.2 Travel Domestic Air Travel 37.0 5.7 2.0 44.7 Total 125.6 18.8 8.4 152.9 Air Travel Emission Trend – FY 14-15 vs. FY 15-16 Air Travel GHG Emissions: FY 14-15 and FY 15-16 180,000 160,000 140,000 Air Travel Emission Trend 120,000 GHG Emissions FY 2014 - 2015 - 100,000 170.1 Thousand tonne CO2e 80,000 60,000 GHG Emissions FY 2015-2016 - 152.9 Thousand tonne CO2e 40,000 20,000 0 FY 2014-2015 FY 2015-2016 Activity-Wise Air Travel Emission Distribution 100% 5.6% 5.5% 90% 12.3% 12.3% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 82.1% 82.1% 30% 20% 10% 0% 14-15 15-16 Scope 3 – Aircraft Fuel Combustion Scope 3 – Fuel Supply Chain Scope 3 – Aircraft Manufacturing International vs. Domestic Air Travel Emission Distribution FY 2014-2015 FY 2015-2016 Domestic Domestic 29% 28% GHG Emission Distribution GHG Emission Distribution Total GHG Emissions- Total GHG Emissions- 170.1 ‘000 Tonnes CO2e 152.9 ‘000 Tonnes CO2e International - International 123.2 ‘000 Tonnes CO2 108.2 ‘000 Tonnes CO2e Domestic - International
Recommended publications
  • The Great Tekhelet Debate—Blue Or Purple? Baruch and Judy Taubes Sterman
    archaeological VIEWS The Great Tekhelet Debate—Blue or Purple? Baruch and Judy Taubes Sterman FOR ANCIENT ISRAELITES, TEKHELET WAS writings of rabbinic scholars and Greek and Roman God’s chosen color. It was the color of the sumptu- naturalists had convinced Herzog that tekhelet was a ous drapes adorning Solomon’s Temple (2 Chroni- bright sky-blue obtained from the natural secretions cles 3:14) as well as the robes worn by Israel’s high of a certain sea snail, the Murex trunculus, known to priests (Exodus 28:31). Even ordinary Israelites produce a dark purple dye.* were commanded to tie one string of tekhelet to But the esteemed chemist challenged Herzog’s the corner fringes (Hebrew, tzitzit) of their gar- contention: “I consider it impossible to produce a ments as a constant reminder of their special rela- pure blue from the purple snails that are known to Tekhelet was tionship with God (Numbers 15:38–39). me,” Friedländer said emphatically.1 But how do we know what color the Biblical writ- Unfortunately, neither Herzog nor Friedländer God’s chosen ers had in mind? While tekhelet-colored fabrics and lived to see a 1985 experiment by Otto Elsner, a color. It colored clothes were widely worn and traded throughout the chemist with the Shenkar College of Fibers in Israel, ancient Mediterranean world, by the Roman period, proving that sky-blue could, in fact, be produced the drapes donning tekhelet and similar colors was the exclusive from murex dye. During a specific stage in the dyeing of Solomon’s privilege of the emperor.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigo Blue Cas N°: 482-89-3
    OECD SIDS INDIGO BLUE FOREWORD INTRODUCTION INDIGO BLUE 3H-Indol-3-one, 2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro CAS N°: 482-89-3 UNEP PUBLICATIONS 1 OECD SIDS INDIGO BLUE SIDS Initial Assessment Report For SIAM 2 Paris, France, 4-6 July 1994 1. Chemical Name: 3H-Indol-3-one, 2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-1,2- dihydro- (Indigo Blue) 2. CAS Number: 482-89-3 3. Sponsor Country: Japan National SIDS Contact Point in Sponsor Country: Mr. Yasuhisa Kawamura, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan 4. Shared Partnership with: 5. Roles/Responsibilities of the Partners: • Name of industry sponsor /consortium • Process used 6. Sponsorship History • How was the chemical or As a high priority chemical for initial assessment, Indigo Blue category brought into the was selected in the framework of OECD HPV Chemicals OECD HPV Chemicals Programme. Programme ? SIDS Dossier and Testing Plan were reviewed at a SIDS Review Meeting in 1993. At SIAM-2, the conclusion was approved with comments. Comments at SIAM-2: Rearrangement of the documents. 7. Review Process Prior to the SIAM: 8. Quality check process: 9. Date of Submission: Date of Circulation: March 1994 10. Date of last Update: 11. Comments: 2 UNEP PUBLICATIONS OECD SIDS INDIGO BLUE SIDS INITIAL ASSESSMENT PROFILE CAS No. 482-89-3 3H-Indol-3-one, 2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro- Chemical Name (Indigo Blue) O H N Structural Formula N O H CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is currently considered of low potential risk and low priority for further work.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Indigo in the Modern Arab World Fulbright Hays Oman and Zanzibar
    Title: Indigo in the Modern Arab World Fulbright Hays Oman and Zanzibar Program June-July 2016 Author: Victoria Vicente School: West Las Vegas Middle School, New Mexico Grade Level: 7-10 World History, United States History Purpose: This lesson is an overview of the geography of Oman and to find out more about the Burqa in Oman. There are examples provided, artwork examples, a photo analysis, an indigo dyeing activity, and readings from, “Language of Dress in the Middle East.” Activate knowledge of the region by asking students questions, for example: What is the color of the ocean? The sky? What does the color blue represent? Have you ever heard the word Burqa? Can you find the Indian Ocean on a Map? Oman? Are you wearing blue jeans? Time: 150 minutes for the lesson Extension Activity: Three days for the indigo dyeing process. Required Materials: Map of the Indian Ocean Region, Map of Oman, including Nizwa, Bahla, and Ibri, Internet, Elmo, Projector, Timeline of Indigo in Oman, show the video clips about dyeing indigo, have the students fill out the photo analysis sheets, and then for the extension activity, spend at least three days or 15 minutes per class for a week, dyeing the material. Resources: 1. Map of Oman and the Indian Ocean region http://geoalliance.asu.edu/maps/world http://cmes.arizona.edu 2. Video clips for background information: Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pG1zd3b7q34 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7z6B7ismg3k http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ay9g6ymhysA&feature=related 3. National Archives Photo Analysis Form or create your own.
    [Show full text]
  • Placement Analysis - 2019 Batch
    Placement Analysis - 2019 Batch Highest Package Offered Average Package Offered Lowest Package Offered 12.0 LPA 4.0 LPA 3.0 LPA Total No of Companies Invited : 502 Total no of Students Placed : 1328 Top Companies with packages above 5 Lacs (CTC) S.No Company Name 1 TCS 2 SHELL TECHNOLOGIES 3 AVIZVA 4 OPTUM 5 Zycus 6 XEBIA IT 7 TEK SYSTEMS 8 SAPIENT 9 MANN INDIA 10 HYUNDAI 11 YAMAHA MOTOR 12 RELIANCE 13 REAL DATA 14 CVENT 15 Think n Learn 16 Tolexo 17 Google 18 Dyson 19 United Lex 20 WIPRO WASE 21 HSBC 22 Accolite 23 Novanet 24 Foresight 25 Blue Star 26 RMS 27 Samsung 28 Amazon 29 Keyence 30 Veris Top Payers /Dream Companies Company Name CTC (LPA) INDIAN AIR FORCE 12 GOOGLE 12 HSBC 12 SIRION LABS 12 NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS 12 SHELL TECHNOLOGIES 10 THINK N LEARN 10 ACCOLITE 10 VMWARE 9.12 TCS (CODEVITA) 7.5 HYUNDAI 7.5 NOVANET 7 ZYCUS 6.5 XEBIA IT 6 MANN INDIA TECHNOLOGIES 6 RELIANCE 6 REAL DATA 6 FORESIGHT 6 BLUE STAR 6 SAMSUNG 6 AMAZON 6 KEYENCE 6 WIPRO WASE 5.57 OPTUM 5.4 SAPIENT 5.3 AVIZVA 5.25 DYSON 5.07 YAMAHA 5 CVENT 5 TOLEXO 5 UNITED LEX 5 PFIZER 5 LAMBORGINI 5 Top Recruiters Company Name Final Placed ACCENTURE 309 TCS 120 WIPRO TECHNOLOGIES 70 THINK N LEARN 40 ICONMA 39 NEC TECHNOLOGIES 29 AMAZON 52 FLIPKART 25 RELIANCE 23 MANN INDIA TECHNOLOGIES 21 SOPRA STERIA 20 HEXAWARE 16 HCL TECHNOLOGIES 23 SAMSUNG 28 ERICSSON 15 NTT DATA 33 Top IT Companies: S.No Company Name 1 NEC 2 TATA TECHNOLOGIES 3 WIPRO 4 ACCENTURE 5 HEXAWARE 6 OPTUM 7 NIIT 8 GRAPECITY 9 TCS 10 MPHASIS 11 SAPIENT 12 NEWGEN 13 ACCENTURE 14 Gemalto 15 Google 16 Genpact
    [Show full text]
  • Flags and Symbols Gilbert Baker Designed the Rainbow flag for the 1978 San Francisco’S Gay Freedom Celebration
    Flags and Symbols ! ! ! Gilbert Baker designed the rainbow flag for the 1978 San Francisco’s Gay Freedom Celebration. In the original eight-color version, pink stood for sexuality, red for life, orange for healing, yellow for the sun, green for nature, turquoise for art, indigo for harmony and violet for the soul.! " Rainbow Flag First unveiled on 12/5/98 the bisexual pride flag was designed by Michael Page. This rectangular flag consists of a broad magenta stripe at the top (representing same-gender attraction,) a broad stripe in blue at the bottoms (representing opposite- gender attractions), and a narrower deep lavender " band occupying the central fifth (which represents Bisexual Flag attraction toward both genders). The pansexual pride flag holds the colors pink, yellow and blue. The pink band symbolizes women, the blue men, and the yellow those of a non-binary gender, such as a gender bigender or gender fluid Pansexual Flag In August, 2010, after a process of getting the word out beyond the Asexual Visibility and Education Network (AVEN) and to non-English speaking areas, a flag was chosen following a vote. The black stripe represents asexuality, the grey stripe the grey-are between sexual and asexual, the white " stripe sexuality, and the purple stripe community. Asexual Flag The Transgender Pride flag was designed by Monica Helms. It was first shown at a pride parade in Phoenix, Arizona, USA in 2000. The flag represents the transgender community and consists of five horizontal stripes. Two light blue which is the traditional color for baby boys, two pink " for girls, with a white stripe in the center for those Transgender Flag who are transitioning, who feel they have a neutral gender or no gender, and those who are intersex.
    [Show full text]
  • Auto Yearbook FY20
    AutoAuto Yearbook FY20 April 30, 2020 Section I: Update – What went down? FY20 was a tough year for the entire Indian automotive industry. Myriad demand and supply side issues continued to trouble the space, continuing the system-wide weakness that set in around the 2018 festive period. Broad- based decline in OEM volumes (Exhibit 1) throughout the year encapsulated the pain at that level as well as the knock-on impact on supporting Report ecosystems of ancillaries, on the one hand, and dealerships, on the other. Higher cost incidence and general reluctance in consumer spending affected the PV and 2-W segments most, while slowing economic activity and system pecial overcapacity took a toll on CV segment. OEM focus on inventory destocking S in the run up to BS-VI switchover from April 2020 and Covid-19 outbreak were other issues that adversely impacted Q4FY20, in particular. Total industry volumes fell 14.8% YoY to 2.63 crore – one of the worst performances in decades, with all major segments registering hefty declines- PV - Down 14.8% YoY to 34.53 lakh units, was dragged by 19.9% dip in passenger cars and 39% decline in vans. UV sub segment, however, posted 2.7% growth courtesy several successful new Research Analysts product launches CV – Was hardest hit, down 29.7% YoY to 7.78 lakh units. M&HCV Shashank Kanodia, CFA [email protected] sub segment dropped 43.3% amid persistent weakness in trucks (down 49.1%) while buses bucked the trend (up 3.5%). LCV sub Jaimin Desai [email protected] segment came off by 20.7% with both – passenger and goods categories in the red 3-W – Was down 10.2% YoY to 11.39 lakh units amid double digit declines in passenger as well as goods categories 2-W – Was down 14.4% YoY to 2.1 crore units.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigo Planting & Harvesting
    Indigo Planting & Harvesting Nicholas Wenner November 2017 Photo by Paige Green by Paige Photo Table of Contents Introduction . .3 Planting . .4 Growing Seedlings . .4 Broadcasting Seedlings . .4 Planting in Flats . .4 Sources for Seeds . 5 Transplanting . .5 Transplanting by Hand . .6 Hand-Held Tools . .6 Walk-Behind Machines . 7 Semi-Automated Tractor-Mounted Machines . .9 Fully-Automated Machines . 11 Harvesting . 12 Harvesting by Hand . .13 Walk-Behind Machines . .14 Tractor Mounted and Self-Propelled Machines . 17 Summary and Recommendations . 20 Planting . 20 Harvesting . .21 Summary and Recommendations . .21 Indigo: Planting & Harvesting 2 Introduction his report was completed with funding generously provided by the Jena and Michael TKing Foundation as part of Fibershed’s True Blue project . The project aims to support bio-regional manufacturing systems for natural indigo dye and indigo-dyed textiles in the Northern California fibershed and beyond . It is one project of many that support Fibershed’s larger mission: “Fibershed develops regional and regenerative fiber systems on behalf of independent working producers, by expanding opportunities to implement carbon farming, forming catalytic foundations to rebuild regional manufacturing, and through connecting end-users to farms and ranches through public education.” In particular, this document aims to support regional farmers in their efforts to bring indigo farming forward as a viable economic option . We give a detailed review of the planting and harvesting steps of indigo dye production and consider how to scale production using appropriate tools and technology . We focus on planting and harvesting because these steps have represented significant bottlenecks in indigo production in Northern California due to the labor content of the manual methods currently employed .
    [Show full text]
  • The Frenchman Steadying Wipro's Ship
    MONDAY,5JULY2021 10 NEWDELHI LONG STORY LIVEMINT.COM THEREPORTAGFRENCHMANE|TALKINGPOINTS |IDEAS |INSIGHT |THE BOTTOMLINE STEADYING WIPRO’S SHIP Leading from Paris, the new Wipro CEOThierryDelaporte is bringing fresh energy to the IT company. Wipro’snew chief executiveofficer,ThierryDelaporte, clearly has his task cut out forhim. Wipro’sITservices revenuesare still in the $8 billion rangewhile its closest competitor HCL TechnologiesLtd crossed the $10billion mark in calendar year 2020. HT Ayushman Baruah visit the Bengaluru headquarters of the role in ensuringthat the deal is asuccess. mint SECOND WIND consultingfirmEY-India.“Theyrequirea [email protected] companythathewasleading.Tomorrow, “Theteamunderherissettlingdownwell,” SHORT differentriskappetite,investmentability, BENGALURU itwouldhavebeenayearsincehetookthe he said. STORY Chart1:Afterlagging behind itspeers commercialconstruct,andtheneedtolev- job, and he is yet to set foot in Bengaluru. Delaporte aims to take a“flexible and foryears, Wipro'sm-cap hassurged past erage an ecosystemofpartnerstocreate henFrenchmanThierry open approach” to Capco’s integration, HCLTechinrecentmonths. long-term value for customers,” he said. Delaporte took the LEADING FROM AFAR giventhescaleandnatureofthebusiness. WHO Marketcapitalization (intrillion) Whenaskedaboutwhatwasworkingfor CEO’s job at IndianIT oday, Delaporte has anascent yet Capcowilloperateasaseparateglobalunit, him,Delaporte highlighted afew factors Paris-based Thierry Delaporte, WiproIHCLTechnologies nfosys Tcredibleturnaroundstorytotell.Part
    [Show full text]
  • Indigo Soars with $33Bn A320neo Order
    EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE THE HINDU DELHI WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2019 BUSINESS 15 EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE market watch Awaiting clarity on AGR, 29-10-2019 % CHANGE Sensex dddddddddddddddddddddd 39,832 ddddddddddddddd1.48 IndiGo soars with $33­bn A320neo order US Dollardddddddddddddddddddd 70.84 ddddddddddddddd0.08 Gold ddddddddddddddddddddddddddd 38,857 ddddddddddddd-1.39 Bharti defers Q2 results Brent oil ddddddddddddddddddddd 61.62 ddddddddddddddd0.16 300­plane order is Airbus’ largest ever with a single airline; to take IndiGo’s A320neo count to 730 ‘Moving DoT to arrive at total amount’ SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT economic growth and mobil­ IndiGo is keen on the MUMBAI ity,” Ronojoy Dutta, CEO, In­ A321XLR, which is the next Special Correspondent matter arising out of recent N IFTY 50 InterGlobe Aviation Ltd., diGo, said in a statement. evolutionary
    [Show full text]
  • Indigo Promoter Feud out in the Open
    EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE THE HINDU DELHI WEDNESDAY, JULY 10, 2019 BUSINESS 15 EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE market watch 09-07-2019 % CHANGE Sensex dddddddddddddddddddddd 38,731 ddddddddddddddd0.03 IndiGo promoter feud out in the open US Dollardddddddddddddddddddd 68.51 ddddddddddddddd0.21 Gold ddddddddddddddddddddddddddd 34,870 ddddddddddddd-1.69 Brent oil ddddddddddddddddddddd 64.19 ddddddddddddd-0.81 Rakesh Gangwal writes to markets regulator SEBI, flags ‘unusual rights’ available to Rahul Bhatia SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT I request SEBI to which IGE has a share. NEW DELHI <> ask the firm to “I hadn't contemplated The war between IndiGo’s make changes to over that over the years, Mr. two promoters Rahul Bhatia Bhatia would start building NIFTY 50 the unusual rights and Rakesh Gangwal is now an ecosystem of other com­ PRICE CHANGE that IGE Group has Adani
    [Show full text]
  • Wipro at a Glance
    Wipro at a Glance Wipro Ltd. (NYSE:WIT) is a leading Information Technology, Consulting and Business Process Services company that delivers solutions to enable its clients DO BUSINESS BETTER.Wipro delivers winning business outcomes through its deep industry experi- ence and a 360 degree view of "Business through Technology." By combining digital strategy, customer centric design, advanced analytics and product engineering approach,Wipro helps its clients create successful and adaptive businesses. Be passionate Unyielding integrity in Treat each person with respect Be global and responsible about clients’ success everything we do Market Clients in Capitalization 175,000+ of over 6 Workforce Continents $ 17 Billion Highlights Wipro acquired Appirio, A Global Cloud Services Company Wipro’s business has grown over Wipro’s Managed File Transfer as a Service (MFTaaS) Platform Over the last Enables Advanced Digital Integration on Microsoft Azure & CAGR of Connected Digital Enterprises on Amazon Web Services. 15 years 24% 25times Greater Toronto Airports Authority Awards Futuristic IT and Business Transformation Contract to Wipro. Wipro and Asahi Beverages, the Australia New Zealand business of the Japanese beverage giant, were jointly recognized for the ‘Best BPO Sourcing’ partnership of 2016 by the ANZ Paragon Awards™ Financials 2015 - 2016 Awards Gross Revenue- US $ 7.7 Billion Wipro recognized as member of Dow Jones Sustainability Index Revenue of IT services segment- US $ 7.3 Billion (DJSI) for the seventh time in a row. Wipro is also a member of the DJSI Emerging Markets Index. Net Income- US $ 1.3 Billion A leading Australian Banking Group has chosen Wipro as a key transformation partner for Testing&Digital Assurance.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts About Asia: India’S Thriving Technology Industry
    Teaching Asia’s Giants: India Facts About Asia: India’s Thriving Technology Industry The Infy hallmark pyramid. It serves as the multimedia studio for Infosys’s headquarters in Bangalore. Source: Wikimedia Commons at https://tinyurl.com/y4orqfx4. Introduction North American readers of this journal, even if they are not especially tech savvy, are likely familiar with Silicon Valley, located in the San Francisco Bay area, and many of the companies like Apple and Google that make the region their home. Fewer are likely aware of India’s own “Silicon Valley” and the various Indian private compa- nies and startups that help to make the IT sector one of the more faster growing sectors of the economy and cre- ate the prospect of India becoming a world leader in technology companies. According to the 2020 Global Innovation Index, an annual study of the most innovative countries across a series of industries published by World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Cornell University and IN- SEAD, a top international private business school, India ranks as the world’s top exporter of information tech- nology (IT) and eighth in the number of science and engineering graduates. The IT industry is a highly significant part of the Indian economy today with the sector contributing 7.7% of India’s total GDP by 2017, a most impressive increase from 1998 when IT accounted for only 1.2% of the nation’s GDP. IT revenues in 2019 totaled US $180 billion. As of 2020, India’s IT workforce accounts for 4.36 million employees and the United States accounts for two-thirds of India’s IT services exports.
    [Show full text]