Cranefly Recording Scheme Newsletter Spring 2007

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cranefly Recording Scheme Newsletter Spring 2007 ) Cranefly News Bex CartwrightBex Dipterists Forum Cranefly Recording Scheme ( For Superfamily Tipuloidea & Families Ptychopteridae & Trichoceridae a Newsletter No 28 Autumn 2014 Editor: John Kramer Sub-editor: John Dobson Nephrotoma Nephrotoma croct year and I have been collecting the Diptera by- Notices catch. So far this year 7 species of cranefly have There are two workshops this Autumn: turned up in the traps. Sept. 6th-7th: Cranefly Workshop with John Kramer. Two days after receiving the June edition of British Woodland Centre, Yarner Wood, nr Bovey Tracey. Wildlife, with Alan Stubbs' article on the comb- th th horned craneflies, I found a female Ctenophora Sept. 27 -28 : Sorby Society, Derbyshire. pectinicornis in Stoke Wood, near Desborough. A Details are available from Derek Whiteley: couple of days after that I received a photo from [email protected] Robin Gossage of a male Dictenidia bimaculata from Glapthorn Cow Pastures. Field Work Reports for 2014 John Showers Pitsford Reservoir, Northamptonshire. 25th May 2014 Craneflies in Scotland: Kingussie field trip: June 2014 Spurred on by the DF field meeting in September 2013, a small group of dipterists paid a return visit to Kingussie in early June 2014. Here I have chosen a few highlights of ecological interest rather than a full commentary. On route to our base at Kingussie in the Spey Valley, a stop at Glen Shee Col gave access to a mountainside at 2200+ft. Here Tipula varipennis was frequent on the drier ground (normally thought of as a lowland woodland species). The seepage and rivulet habitats were however of greater interest for craneflies. John Kramer joined the Northants and At this height, the early spring species Tipula Peterborough Diptera Group meeting at Pitsford subnodicornis and Molophilus ater were easy to Water Reserve (GR. SP7870) in May. Members find (the latter is small, black and wingless, easy to attending with JS and JK, were Jolyon Alderman, overlook after sweeping, but very noticeable (cont.) Kev Rowley, GrahamWanes and Brian Harding. The site includes lake and stream margins, marsh Contents and carr. The weather was warm, dry and still; Notices 1 perfect for recording. Field Work Reports 2014 Pitsford Reservoir, Northamptonshire 1 After a morning's field work JK helped the group Craneflies in Scotland: Kingussie field trip 1-2 with identification issues in Anglian Water's Holcot DF Summer Field Meeting 2014: NW Wales 2-3 Fishing Lodge. I have not yet received all the Report from the Mersey Basin 3-4 records from the group but John found 23 species Cranefly Report for Shropshire: First half of 2014 4-5 of cranefly including: Tipula (3 spp.), Ula sylvatica Species Notes (Pediciidae), Gonempeda flava, Molophilus (4 Nephrotoma crocata in Shropshire 5-6 spp.), Limonia (4 spp. including L. flavipes and L. Tipula irrorata: Its first discovery in Britain 7-8 nigropunctata). I found 13 species, 8 of which were Notes on the Pupae of Dicranomyia goritiensis 8 not on John's list, giving 31 species in total. It is Observations on Dictenidia bimaculata 8-9 hoped that John's efforts will encourage more Conference & Meeting Reports th cranefly recording in Northants., which is an under- 8 International Congress of Dipterology 9-10 recorded vice-county for Diptera, except in the People & Historical Notes Peterborough area. Robert Henderson (1864-1940) 10 Copy deadline: Cranefly News 29 Spring 2015 10 The Wildlife Trust team and their volunteers at Distribution Maps 11-12 Pitsford Reserve run two moth traps throughout the Cranefly News 28 Autumn 2014 1 once tuned to what to look for), together with Ptychoptera scutellaris and Phalacrocera replicata another acid associate, Euphylidorea meigenii. were found (the latter is rarely recorded). More significant was the presence of some local A long period of drought had resulted in river levels species, here associated with base-rich flushes with being low, and so rather poor for river-margin rivulets; Limnophila schranki (small specimens), craneflies at that time. We picked up single female Eloeophila trimaculata and Molophilus propinquus. of Tipula bistilata, as a species of sandy exposed Stops by the River Dee, near Braemar and Crathie, riverine sediments (early June should be the peak yielded Tipula montium, Hexatoma fuscipennis and period so emergence appears to have been Limnophila schranki (the latter at a backwater exceptionally early this year; larvae in drained channel), and adjacent wetland had Tricyphona ‘terrestrial’ sand would warm-up quick in a drought) unicolor and Euphylidorea phaeostigma. and some male Hexatoma fuscipennis (aquatic larvae, emergence at typical time). We found only a The roadside limestone quarry just west of few of other species, such as Hoplolabis vicina and Tomintoul was a priority stop for craneflies, and we Eloeophila verralli. were rewarded by finding Tipula cheethami and Dactylolabis sexmaculata on a wet rock face, and A small party that went to the coast found on the quarry floor, along with Dicranomyia occidua Dicranomyia melleicauda ssp. complicata at the and Molophilus propinquus where sparsely western end of Culbin sands, an important Scottish vegetated calcareous mud was present. Not bad record for this very scarce upper saltmarsh species: for day-1, before reaching Kingussie. D. sera, a very local upper saltmarsh species, was also found. The Spey valley has extensive glacial deposits, often well-drained but with boggy ground in the Overall, although their numbers were down during hollows, and some excellent groundwater-fed the drought, it was a very productive meeting for sloping mires. The high ground accessible via the craneflies. Cairngorms ski lift car park yielded expected Alan Stubbs species such as Tipula subnodicornis and Molophilus ater, but a combination of drought and DF Summer Field Meeting 2014, wind was limiting. Craneflies in NW Wales: 5-12 July 2014 The margins of Loch Morlich (a lake with both Bangor is conveniently placed by the bridge from inflow and outflow, and both gritty and sedge-lined Caernarvonshire to Anglesey, two very different shores) and related ground produced 7 species of landscapes with very different histories in the Tipula. recording of craneflies. A very different lake is found at Kinrara, in a big In the early 1920s, Barnes surveyed the cranefly hollow in glacial drift, and connecting narrowly with fauna of Caernarvonshire for a PhD, as far as I am the River Spey. Here the mire is peat-based, in part aware the first ecological study on insects in Britain. floating, and is largely groundwater-fed as It was published in volume 13 of the Journal of evidenced by sloping mire margins (which are not Ecology in 1926, so he began his study in the very directly related to fluctuating water tables via river early days of ecology as a discipline. He chose a level fluctuations). Some very unusual species for series of sampling locations, made some visits and the Spey Valley were found included Helius wrote-up his findings in a manner which is very pallirostris (among reeds and sedges at aquatic familiar today but ground-breaking at the time. margin), Tipula pierrei (in a limited area where Anglesey by contrast still lacks a published list. muddy peat was present) and Phylidorea longicornis (seepage on poor fen). P. abdominalis Anglesey is relatively flat, (although not by was locally common in very wet areas with bog- Peterborough standards). It lacks significant myrtle (Myrica gale). Where the outflow from the woodland but is famed for its wetlands and sand Kinrara hollow meets the River Spey, Dicranota dunes. It has the advantage of the presence of an exclusa was present. Other useful records included outcrop of Carboniferous Limestone, largely Tricyphona unicolor, Cheilotrichia imbuta and masked by Boulder Clay, with a hydrology that Idioptera pulchella. supports major fenlands, some of which are NNRs with convenient board walks. There are many Craigellachie NNR lies on a hillside overlooking ecological variants, including curious juxtapositions, Aviemore. There are two small lakes of limited such as sundew growing inches away from true fen interest, but it is the shaded stream- and seepage- vegetation. fed mire that are of particular interest for craneflies; the presence of bog myrtle usually indicates good The very early spring and drought proved limiting potential. On this occasion, the main find was the but we did have major finds, including a species of stream species Pedicia littoralis, a fairly large Pilaria only previously known from one fen in S yellow cranefly that appears to be uncommon in the Wales and some fens in East Anglia (we have still Spey valley. to confirm it’s identity); recorded here in a stand of slender sedge (Carex lasiocarpa) in a seepage fen. Access to the RSPB Inch marshes was given for Other good finds included Molophilus pleuralis. some areas that were not critical during the main bird-breeding season. Tromie bridge meadow has On sand dunes, we succeeded in finding some very nice seepages on poor-fen, where Nephrotoma quadristriata, (See map) at Aberfaw, where there are major areas of dune slack. There is Cranefly News 28 Autumn 2014 2 an old record for nearby Newborough Warren. It is Snowdonia behind Idwal Cottage, and also at otherwise known from a few dunes on the coast of Bethesda. mid- and south Wales, Braunton Burrows on the N. We hit the peak for Diogma glabrata; it was found Devon coast and on the coast of SW Cumbria. The on a spread of sites, a species often regarded as coast also includes some saltmarshes, producing scarce. But in dashing off in all directions from Dicranomyia melleicauda at several sites. (See home base, it is easy to omit to record habitat on map) (complicata de Meijere is the subspecies - the the doorstep, a limestone rock seepage yielding male genitalia are very complicated).
Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Digest
    Dipterists Digest 2019 Vol. 26 No. 1 Cover illustration: Eliozeta pellucens (Fallén, 1820), male (Tachinidae) . PORTUGAL: Póvoa Dão, Silgueiros, Viseu, N 40º 32' 59.81" / W 7º 56' 39.00", 10 June 2011, leg. Jorge Almeida (photo by Chris Raper). The first British record of this species is reported in the article by Ivan Perry (pp. 61-62). Dipterists Digest Vol. 26 No. 1 Second Series 2019 th Published 28 June 2019 Published by ISSN 0953-7260 Dipterists Digest Editor Peter J. Chandler, 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL (E-mail: [email protected]) Editorial Panel Graham Rotheray Keith Snow Alan Stubbs Derek Whiteley Phil Withers Dipterists Digest is the journal of the Dipterists Forum . It is intended for amateur, semi- professional and professional field dipterists with interests in British and European flies. All notes and papers submitted to Dipterists Digest are refereed. Articles and notes for publication should be sent to the Editor at the above address, and should be submitted with a current postal and/or e-mail address, which the author agrees will be published with their paper. Articles must not have been accepted for publication elsewhere and should be written in clear and concise English. Contributions should be supplied either as E-mail attachments or on CD in Word or compatible formats. The scope of Dipterists Digest is: - the behaviour, ecology and natural history of flies; - new and improved techniques (e.g. collecting, rearing etc.); - the conservation of flies; - reports from the Diptera Recording Schemes, including maps; - records and assessments of rare or scarce species and those new to regions, countries etc.; - local faunal accounts and field meeting results, especially if accompanied by ecological or natural history interpretation; - descriptions of species new to science; - notes on identification and deletions or amendments to standard key works and checklists.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome ~ ~ Contents
    Shropshire Entomology – April 2011 (No.3) A bi-annual newsletter focussing upon the study of insects and other invertebrates in the county of Shropshire (V.C. 40) April 2010 (Vol. 3) Editor: Pete Boardman [email protected] ~ Welcome ~ Welcome to the 3rd edition of the Shropshire Entomology newsletter. By the time you receive this the recording season should be under way and hopefully those cold and miserable winter days will be but a mere memory. Also underway will be the Invertebrate challenge programme of training days, a three year project funded by The Heritage Lottery Fund and The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, which will be running around 100 events in total concentrating on the identification of some of Shropshire’s most under-recorded and under-studied invertebrates. It will also enable Shropshire Entomology to continue for the next three years, as well as enable my involvement with the SEDN as manager of the invertebrate database. Many thanks once more to everyone who has contributed to this edition. It can only function as a ‘newsletter’ if people contribute articles of news and views, so please do consider submitting articles that relate to entomology in Shropshire or entomology in general. The deadline for submission of content for Vol. 4 is Friday 16th September 2011. Please feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you feel might be interested in it. Note – past newsletters will soon be able to be downloaded as PDF’s from www.invertebrate-challenge.org.uk. ~ Contents ~ The Keeled Skimmer Orthetrum coerulescens
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report 1
    Sand pit for Biodiversity at Cep II quarry Researcher: Klára Řehounková Research group: Petr Bogusch, David Boukal, Milan Boukal, Lukáš Čížek, František Grycz, Petr Hesoun, Kamila Lencová, Anna Lepšová, Jan Máca, Pavel Marhoul, Klára Řehounková, Jiří Řehounek, Lenka Schmidtmayerová, Robert Tropek Březen – září 2012 Abstract We compared the effect of restoration status (technical reclamation, spontaneous succession, disturbed succession) on the communities of vascular plants and assemblages of arthropods in CEP II sand pit (T řebo ňsko region, SW part of the Czech Republic) to evaluate their biodiversity and conservation potential. We also studied the experimental restoration of psammophytic grasslands to compare the impact of two near-natural restoration methods (spontaneous and assisted succession) to establishment of target species. The sand pit comprises stages of 2 to 30 years since site abandonment with moisture gradient from wet to dry habitats. In all studied groups, i.e. vascular pants and arthropods, open spontaneously revegetated sites continuously disturbed by intensive recreation activities hosted the largest proportion of target and endangered species which occurred less in the more closed spontaneously revegetated sites and which were nearly absent in technically reclaimed sites. Out results provide clear evidence that the mosaics of spontaneously established forests habitats and open sand habitats are the most valuable stands from the conservation point of view. It has been documented that no expensive technical reclamations are needed to restore post-mining sites which can serve as secondary habitats for many endangered and declining species. The experimental restoration of rare and endangered plant communities seems to be efficient and promising method for a future large-scale restoration projects in abandoned sand pits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire: Craneflies and Winter Gnats
    The Diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire: Craneflies and Winter Gnats by Phil Brighton 32, Wadeson Way, Croft, Warrington WA3 7JS [email protected] Version 1.1 26 November 2017 1 Summary This document provides a new checklist for the craneflies and winter gnats (Tipuloidea, Ptychopteridae and Trichoceridae) to extend the lists of the diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire first published by Kidd and Bindle in 1959. Overall statistics on recording activity are given by decade and hectad. Checklists are presented for each of the three Watsonian vice-counties 58, 59, and 60 detailing for each species the number of records, year of earliest and most recent record, and the number of hectads with records. A combined checklist showing distribution by the three vice-counties is also included, covering a total of 264 species, amounting to 75% of the current British checklist. Introduction This report is the third in a series to update and extend the partial checklist of the diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire published in 1959 by Leonard Kidd and Alan Brindle1. There were two previous updates, in 19642 and 19713. The previous reports in this series cover the soldierflies and allies4 and the Sepsidae5, the latter family not having been covered in Ref 1. The reader is referred to the first two reports for the background and rationale of these checklists, as well as the history of diptera recording and available data sources. The description of methodology is also kept to a minimum in the present report: only significant differences from the previous publications will be outlined.
    [Show full text]
  • BD2304 Scoping Study to Assess Soil Compaction Affecting Upland and Lowland Grassland in England and Wales
    BD2304 Scoping study to assess soil compaction affecting upland and lowland grassland in England and Wales APPENDICES TO SID5 The appendices give more detail about each part of the project and include all relevant references at the end of each section. APPENDIX 1 Mapping the extent of soil compaction (Work Package 1) APPENDIX 2 The causes of soil compaction (Work Package 2a) APPENDIX 3 The impacts of soil compaction (Work Package 2b) APPENDIX 4 Conflicts and synergies within existing and potential ES options, between objectives relating to soil compaction and its remediation and other scheme objectives (Work Package 3) APPENDIX 5 Responses received at the Stakeholder workshop (Work Package 5) APPENDIX 6 Glossary of terms Appendix to SID5 1 Soil compaction in England and Wales January 2008 APPENDIX3: Impacts of soil compaction 3.1 The impact of soil compaction on soil flora and fauna The following appendix provides more detail on specific studies highlighted in the main report in relation to the impacts of compaction on soil flora and fauna. Soil compaction is generally apparent as an increase in bulk density and hence a decrease in the overall porosity of the soil, with a reduction in the number of larger pores. However, a gross parameter such as this may mask subtle but important changes in the nature of the pore network, including the pore-size distribution and the connectivity and tortuosity of such pores, which will impact on organisms in many ways. The pore network defines the physical habitat for soil organisms, directly providing the living space which they inhabit, and indirectly modulating the dynamics of water, solutes, gases and volatiles, and hence the metabolic processes of the biota.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire Wildlife Trust
    Cheshire Wildlife Trust Heteroptera and Diptera surveys on the Manchester Mosses with PANTHEON analysis by Phil Brighton 32, Wadeson Way, Croft, Warrington WA3 7JS [email protected] on behalf of Lancashire and Cheshire Wildlife Trusts Version 1.0 September 2018 Lancashire Wildlife Trust Page 1 of 35 Abstract This report describes the results of a series of surveys on the Manchester mosslands covering heteroptera (shield bugs, plant bugs and allies), craneflies, hoverflies, and a number of other fly families. Sites covered are the Holcroft Moss reserve of Cheshire Wildlife Trust and the Astley, Cadishead and Little Woolden Moss reserves of Lancashire Wildlife Trust. A full list is given of the 615 species recorded and their distribution across the four sites. This species list is interpreted in terms of feeding guilds and habitat assemblages using the PANTHEON software developed by Natural England. This shows a strong representation in the sample of species associated with shaded woodland floor and tall sward and scrub. The national assemblage of peatland species is somewhat less well represented, but includes a higher proportion of rare or scarce species. A comparison is also made with PANTHEON results for similar surveys across a similar range of habitats in the Delamere Forest. This suggests that the invertebrate diversity value of the Manchester Mosses is rather less, perhaps as a result of their fragmented geography and proximity to past and present sources of transport and industrial pollution. Introduction The Manchester Mosses comprise several areas of lowland bog or mire embedded in the flat countryside between Warrington and Manchester. They include several areas designated as SSSIs in view of the highly distinctive and nationally important habitat, such as Risley Moss, Holcroft Moss, Bedford Moss, and Astley Moss.
    [Show full text]
  • 20140620 Thesis Vanklink
    University of Groningen Of dwarves and giants van Klink, Roel IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2014 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van Klink, R. (2014). Of dwarves and giants: How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 29-09-2021 Of Dwarves and Giants How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes Roel van Klink This PhD-project was carried out at the Community and Conservation Ecology group, which is part of the Centre for Ecological and Environmental Studies of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    CRANE FLIES FROM THE MARITIME PROVINCE OF SIBERIA By Charles P. Alexander Of the Massachusetts Agricultural College, Amherst The crane flies that were taken by Prof. T. D. A. and Mrs. Cock- erell on their recent trip to Eastern Siberia have been submitted to me for determination. Because of the almost total lack of material and records from this region, the collection proved to be of excep- tional interest and furnished several important additions to the incomplete list of the Tipuloidea of Eastern Siberia. In addition to the species recorded in the following pages, Professor Cockerell writes me that he saw, but was unable to capture, a specimen of Ctena- croscelis mikado (Westwood) at Tsuruga, Japan. My sincere thanks are extended to Professor and Mrs. Cockerell, and to the National Museum authorities, for the privilege of studying this series of Tipu- lidae. The types and specimens of all other included species are preserved in the National Collection. In order that the known and probable components of the Tipulid fauna of Eastern Siberia may be more correctly understood, the following list of Regional Species is supplied. In addition, it may be well to indicate the occurrence of the European Dictenidia himaculata (Linnaeus) in this coastal province of Siberia, an enormous extension of the range of the species, which, however, has never been taken in Japan. REGIONAL SPECIES Almost the only Siberian Tipulidae that may be considered as be- ing regional are the following: Tipula hreviceps (Motschulsky)^ from Amurland and few Tipuline crane flies belonging to the sub- tribe Ctenophoraria, described in 1873 and 1S87 by Portschinsky {Ctenophora parva Portschinsky, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeographic Patterns of Finnish Crane Flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea)
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Psyche Volume 2012, Article ID 913710, 20 pages doi:10.1155/2012/913710 Research Article Biogeographic Patterns of Finnish Crane Flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) Jukka Salmela Zoological Museum, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland Correspondence should be addressed to Jukka Salmela, jueesal@utu.fi Received 27 April 2012; Revised 25 July 2012; Accepted 14 August 2012 Academic Editor: David Roubik Copyright © 2012 Jukka Salmela. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Species richness of terrestrial and freshwater biota generally decreases with increasing latitude. Some taxa, however, show an anomalous species richness pattern in a regional or global scale. The aim of this study was to examine (i) regional variation in species richness, (ii) faunistic composition, (iii) occupancy, and (iv) proportions of different distribution types of Finnish crane flies. Analyses were based on incidence data pooled into 20 biogeographical provinces. Finnish crane fly fauna consists of 335 species; the provincial richness varies from 91 to 237. The species richness of all species and saproxylic/fungivorous species decreased with increasing latitude; mire-dwelling crane flies displayed a reversed pattern (Spearman’s correlations). Thirty-one species occupied a single province and 11 species were present in all provinces. Provincial assemblages showed a strong latitudinal gradient (NMS ordination) and faunistic distance increased with increasing geographical distance (Mantel test). Nearly half (48%) of the Finnish crane flies are Trans-Palaearctic, roughly one-third (34%) are West Palaearctic, and only 16 and 2% are Holarctic and Fennoscandian, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Craneflies of Sardinia ( Diptera: Tipulidae)*
    ConserVaZione habitat inVertebrati 5: 641–658 (2011) CnbfVr The Cranefl ies of Sardinia ( Diptera: Tipulidae)* Pjotr OOSTER BROEK Sixhavenweg 25, 1021 HG Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] *In: Nardi G., Whitmore D., Bardiani M., Birtele D., Mason F., Spada L. & Cerretti P. (eds), Biodiversity of Marganai and Montimannu (Sardinia). Research in the framework of the ICP Forests network. Conservazione Habitat Invertebrati, 5: 641–658. ABSTRACT A review is presented of the 31 Tipulidae species known from Sardinia. The paper includes records from the literature, collections and recent collect- ing. The Tipulidae of Sardinia can be divided into two groups of about equal size: one group of species endemic or subendemic to geographic Italy, and another group with species that are more widespread. About 10% of the species are strictly endemic of the island, while 23% are endemic to Sardinia and Corsica. Key words: Tipulidae, cranefl ies, Sardinia, Italy, endemism. RIASSUNTO I Tipulidi della Sardegna (Diptera: Tipulidae) È fornita una rassegna delle 31 specie di Tipulidae note della Sardegna. Il lavoro include dati di letteratura, museali e di recenti raccolte. I Tipulidae della Sardegna possono essere divisi in due gruppi, circa della stessa dimensione: uno comprende specie endemiche o subendemiche dell'Italia geografi ca, l'altro comprende specie che sono più ampiamente diffuse. Circa il 10% delle specie è strettamente endemico dell'isola e il 23% è endemico di Sardegna e Corsica. INTRODUCTION The larvae feed on a variety of material such as de- caying plant and animal matter, mosses and algae. Tipulidae are medium- to large-sized, slender-bodied A few species, especially in Tipula (Tipula Linnaeus, nematocerous Diptera, and include some of the larg- 1758) and Nephrotoma Meigen, 1803, are destructive est forms among the Nematocera (body length up to feeders on pasture grasses, seedlings and crops and 60 mm, wing length up to 40 mm).
    [Show full text]