DOCSLIB.ORG

Abundance, Structure and Function of Zooplankton-Associated Bacterial Communities Within the York River, VA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abundance, Structure and Function of Zooplankton-Associated Bacterial Communities Within the York River, VA W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2013 Abundance, structure and function of zooplankton-associated bacterial communities within the York River, VA Samantha L. Bickel College of William and Mary - Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Marine Biology Commons, and the Microbiology Commons Recommended Citation Bickel, Samantha L., "Abundance, structure and function of zooplankton-associated bacterial communities within the York River, VA" (2013). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539616567. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.25773/v5-mrzd-mq81 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABUNDANCE, STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF ZOOPLANKTON- ASSOCIATED BACTERIAL COMMUNITIES WITHIN THE YORK RIVER, VA A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the School of Marine Science The College of William and Mary In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Samantha Lynn Bickel 2013 APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy '/ Samantha L. Bickel Approved by the Committee July, 2013 f Kam W. Tarig, Ph.D. Committee Chaiirnan/ Advisor Vladk J. Brush, Ph.D. J. Emmett Duffy, Ph.D. J Kimberly S. Reece, Ph.D. JsA cOu Fred C. Dobbs, Ph.D. Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS........................................................................................................ vi LIST OF TABLES...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES..................................................................................................................... ix ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................................. xi AUTHOR’S NOTE..................................................................................................................... xii CHAPTER 1 Introduction to the Dissertation ...................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 3 STRUCTURE OF DISSERTATION......................................................................................6 REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................9 CHAPTER 2 Zooplankton-associated and free-living bacteria in the York River, Chesapeake Bay: Comparison of temporal variations and controlling factors..................................................12 ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................. 13 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 14 MATERIALS & METHODS.................................................................................................17 RESULTS.................................................................................................................................25 DISCUSSION..........................................................................................................................30 REFERENCES........................................................................................................................ 39 CHAPTER 3 Structure and function of zooplankton-associated bacterial communities in a temperate estuary change more with time than zooplankton species .....................................................55 ABSTRACT.............................................................................................................................56 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................57 MATERIALS & METHODS.................................................................................................61 RESULTS..................................................................................................................................67 DISCUSSION..........................................................................................................................72 REFERENCES.........................................................................................................................82 CHAPTER 4 Carbon substrate usage by aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria associated with estuarine zooplankton ............................................................................................................... 103 ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................... 104 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 105 MATERIALS AND METHODS........................................................................................ 109 RESULTS................................................................................................................................114 DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................118 LITERATURE CITED.........................................................................................................127 CHAPTER 5 Conclusions and Future Research ............................................................................................149 Zooplankton-associated bacteria in Estuarine Systems ................................................... 150 Future Research Directions ..................................................................................................153 REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................157 APPENDIX I Fluorescence in situ Hybridization with bacterial group specific probes .......................... 161 MATERIALS & METHODS...............................................................................................162 RESULTS & DISCUSSION................................................................................................165 REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................166 APPENDIX II Alternative Multiple Regression Models Assessed by AIC 168 APPENDIX III Zooplankton Community Composition VITA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are a number of people who generously shared their time, knowledge and resources with me during my time at VIMS. Without them, this dissertation would not have been possible. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor and mentor, Kam Tang. I truly appreciate his generosity with his time, and exceptional guidance and patience when things didn’t go quite as planned. He constantly challenged me to think critically and helped me become a better scientist. I am grateful for all members of the Tang lab, past and present who helped with experiments or were available for conversations, including David Elliott, Haley Garrison, Yuan Dong, Sikai Peng and Jami Ivory. I would also like to thank my committee members, Drs. Fred Dobbs, Kim Reece, Mark Brush and Emmett Duffy for their advice and interest in my research. Funding for this research was provided by NSF grant OCE-0814558, NSF GK-12 program (Division of Graduate Education 0840804), a VIMS Dean’s fellowship and a Leibniz Institute for Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) visiting PhD student fellowship. Thank you to the entire MiBi group at IGB including Hans-Peter Grossart, Kirsten Pohlmann, Claudia Dziallas, Solvig Pinnow, Ivette Salka, Franzi Leunert, Stefan Rosel, Katrin Attermeyer and Katharina Frindte, for welcoming me and making me feel at home during my time in Germany in addition to sharing your knowledge of microbial ecology. I want to thank a number of people at VIMS for sharing data and equipment, processing samples, helping with procedures and trouble shooting, and just being helpful in general: Steven Baer, Quinn Roberts, Steve Kaattari, Ryan Carnegie, Alanna MacIntyre, Gail Scott, Bill Jones, Nancy Stokes, Gina Burrell, Maxine Butler and Fonda Powell. Also, a huge thank you to all the people that gave the opportunity to participate in the GK-12 program: Kam Tang, Iris Anderson, Carol Hopper-Brill, Vicki Clark, Pat McGrath, Amy Holtschneider and all the students at Chesapeake Bay Governor’s School and York High School. Even when I was in the throes of data analysis and dissertation writing, your enthusiasm made me remember how much fun science can be and why I wanted to be a scientist in the first place. To all my friends, I don’t think I can ever repay you for the kindness, generosity, encouragement and support you have offered me throughout the years. Thank you for your willingness to help in the lab and field at the strangest hours, but more
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Non-Native Freshwater Cladoceran Bosmina Coregoni (Baird, 1857) Established on the Pacific Coast of North America
    BioInvasions Records (2013) Volume 2, Issue 4: 281–286 Open Access doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2013.2.4.03 © 2013 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2013 REABIC Rapid Communication Non-native freshwater cladoceran Bosmina coregoni (Baird, 1857) established on the Pacific coast of North America Adrianne P. Smits1*, Arni Litt1, Jeffery R. Cordell1, Olga Kalata1,2 and Stephen M. Bollens2 1 School of Aquatic and Fisheries Science, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA 2 School of the Environment, Washington State University, 14204 NE Salmon Creek Avenue, Vancouver, WA 98686-9600, USA E-mail: [email protected] (APS), [email protected] (AL), [email protected] (JRC), [email protected] (OK), [email protected] (SMB) *Corresponding author Received: 26 July 2013 / Accepted: 10 October 2013 / Published online: 30 October 2013 Handling editor: Ian Duggan Abstract The freshwater cladoceran Bosmina coregoni (Baird, 1857), native to Eurasia, has established and spread in the Great Lakes region of North America since the 1960s. Here we report the first detection of B. coregoni on the Pacific coast of North America, in three geographically distinct locations: the Lower Columbia River Estuary (LCRE), Lake Washington in western Washington state, and the Columbia River Basin in south eastern Washington state. Bosmina coregoni was detected on multiple sampling dates in Lake Washington and the LCRE between 2008 and 2012. Key words: zooplankton; invasive; Washington; freshwater; range expansion Introduction and Hebert 1994). Until now this species has not been reported on the Pacific coast of North Non-indigenous zooplankton have successfully America, but has been detected as far west as invaded coastal and inland freshwater bodies Lake Winnipeg and Missouri (Suchy et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) of the South-East of the Korean Peninsula, with Twenty New Records for Korea*
    Zootaxa 3368: 50–90 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) of the south-east of the Korean Peninsula, with twenty new records for Korea* ALEXEY A. KOTOV1,2, HYUN GI JEONG2 & WONCHOEL LEE2 1 A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Leninsky Prospect 33, Moscow 119071, Russia E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Life Science, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791, Republic of Korea *In: Karanovic, T. & Lee, W. (Eds) (2012) Biodiversity of Invertebrates in Korea. Zootaxa, 3368, 1–304. Abstract We studied the cladocerans from 15 different freshwater bodies in south-east of the Korean Peninsula. Twenty species are first records for Korea, viz. 1. Sida ortiva Korovchinsky, 1979; 2. Pseudosida cf. szalayi (Daday, 1898); 3. Scapholeberis kingi Sars, 1888; 4. Simocephalus congener (Koch, 1841); 5. Moinodaphnia macleayi (King, 1853); 6. Ilyocryptus cune- atus Štifter, 1988; 7. Ilyocryptus cf. raridentatus Smirnov, 1989; 8. Ilyocryptus spinifer Herrick, 1882; 9. Macrothrix pen- nigera Shen, Sung & Chen, 1961; 10. Macrothrix triserialis Brady, 1886; 11. Bosmina (Sinobosmina) fatalis Burckhardt, 1924; 12. Chydorus irinae Smirnov & Sheveleva, 2010; 13. Disparalona ikarus Kotov & Sinev, 2011; 14. Ephemeroporus cf. barroisi (Richard, 1894); 15. Camptocercus uncinatus Smirnov, 1971; 16. Camptocercus vietnamensis Than, 1980; 17. Kurzia (Rostrokurzia) longirostris (Daday, 1898); 18. Leydigia (Neoleydigia) acanthocercoides (Fischer, 1854); 19. Monospilus daedalus Kotov & Sinev, 2011; 20. Nedorchynchotalona chiangi Kotov & Sinev, 2011. Most of them are il- lustrated and briefly redescribed from newly collected material. We also provide illustrations of four taxa previously re- corded from Korea: Sida crystallina (O.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Bosmina Longirostris by Leptodora Kindtii
    Limnol. Oceanogr., 36(3), 199 1, 483-495 0 199 1, by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc Invertebrate predation in Lake Michigan: Regulation of Bosmina longirostris by Leptodora kindtii Donn K. Branstrator and John T. Lehman Department of Biology, Natural Science Building, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48 109 Abstract The density of Bosmina longirostris (0. F. Mueller) declined loo-fold between 25 June and 20 August 1985 in Lake Michigan; a similar pattern of changing abundances was observed in 1986 but not in 1987 or 1988. Bosmina collected from periods before and during the decline in 1985 and 1986 were examined for size at maturity and clutch size. Population size-frequency distributions suggest that some animals began to mature at smaller sizes during the decline in 1985. In some cases, the average clutch size for Bosmina of similar body lengths was significantly reduced during the decline in 1985 and 1986. These data suggest that food limitation was a factor in the species decline in both years. Gut content analyses indicate that of seven potential predators, Leptodora kindtii (Focke) was probably most responsible for Bosmina mortality. There is ample evidence that Leptodora does not consume strictly fluid from its prey: juvenile Leptodoru ate mainly smaller prey that included Bosmina and the rotifer Conochilus; adults ate a broader size range of prey that included mainly Bosmina, Daphnia, and copepods. In 1987 and 1988, Bythotrephes cederstroemii Schoedler was abundant in Lake Michigan and was contemporaneous with collapse ofthe Leptodora population and concurrent increase of the Bosmina population in August and September.
    [Show full text]
  • Contrasting Life Histories of the Predatory Cladocerans Leptodora Kindtii and Bythotrephes Longimanus
    JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH j VOLUME 27 j NUMBER 6 j PAGES 569–585 j 2005 Contrasting life histories of the predatory cladocerans Leptodora kindtii and Bythotrephes longimanus DONN K. BRANSTRATOR* DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH, DULUTH, MN 55812, USA *CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: [email protected] Downloaded from Received January 12, 2005; accepted in principle April 4, 2005; accepted for publication May 23, 2005; published online June 13, 2005 Communicating editor: K.J. Flynn http://plankt.oxfordjournals.org/ The predatory cladocerans, Leptodora kindtii (Focke, 1844) and Bythotrephes longimanus (Leydig, 1860), express markedly different life-history traits. Leptodora produce small-bodied neonates that mature at small sizes but continue to grow throughout life. Bythotrephes produce larger neonates in both relative and absolute terms that grow rapidly to a large size at maturity whereupon they curtail somatic growth and divert resources mainly to reproduction. Despite their remarkable differences, the sets of life-history traits of both species appear to be solutions to the same basic selection pressures imposed by visually discriminating gape-limited fishes and foraging constraints imposed by prey size. Leptodora stresses pre-contact (transpar- ency) while Bythotrephes stresses postcontact (caudal spine) modes of morphological defense against fishes. at University of Minnesota Duluth on December 5, 2013 Mounting these disparate modes of defense has consequences for selection on timing and allocation to body growth that may underlie competitive imbalance between the species. Owing to the production of large- bodied neonates that grow rapidly, Bythotrephes quickly attain body sizes that both admit them to a broader prey base in size and taxonomic variety, and allow shorter prey handling times, in comparison to Leptodora.
    [Show full text]
  • ZOOPLANKTON of the HUDSON RIVER ESTUARY
    Karl Van Ginderdeuren/World Register of Marine Species COMB JELLY HYDROMEDUSA Photo by Heather Malcom Photos from © www.micrographia.com COPEPODS WATER FLEA Photo by Piet Spaans Photo by Marco Spiller PHANTOM MIDGE LARVA ROTIFER ZOOPLANKTON of the HUDSON RIVER ESTUARY HYDROMEDUSA COMB JELLY What is it? Sarsia tubulosa is a hydrozoan; related to jellyfish & sea anemones What is it? Mnemiopsis leidyi is a ctenophore; How big is it? to ¼ in. across unlike jellyfish, it lacks stinging cells What does it eat? tiny zooplankton How big is it? species shown (up to 4 in. long Where does it live? ocean, estuaries, bays; What does it eat? smaller zooplankton, larval brackish & salt water fish, fish eggs What is its life cycle? alternates body form; Where does it live? ocean, estuaries, bays; planktonic hydromedusae release eggs that brackish & salt water hatch & become hydroids - plant-like forms What is its life cycle? hatches from egg; fixed to the bottom; hydroids produce buds young generally look like adult that break off to become new hydromedusae WATER FLEA COPEPODS What is it? Bosmina freyi is a crustacean; What is it? crustacean; one of many species in water fleas are properly called cladocerans genus Cyclops (left) & genus Diaptomus (right) How big is it? to 0.6 mm How big is it? species shown less than 2 mm 1 What does it eat? detritus, algae, plants; ( /10 in.) long some water fleas eat tiny zooplankton What does it eat? detritus, algae, smaller Where does it live? lakes, ponds, rivers, crustaceans marshes, estuaries, bays; fresh & brackish
    [Show full text]
  • Size Variation of Morphological Traits in Bosmina Freyi and Its Relation with Environmental Variables in a Tropical Eutrophic Reservoir
    Size variation of morphological traits in Bosmina freyi and its relation with environmental variables in a tropical eutrophic reservoir RESEARCH / INVESTIGACIÓN Size variation of morphological traits in Bosmina freyi and its relation with environmental variables in a tropical eutrophic reservoir Yury Catalina López-Cardona1, Edison Parra-García1, Jaime Palacio-Baena2, Silvia Lucía Villabona-González3 DOI. 10.21931/RB/2021.06.02.16 Abstract: We assessed the size variation of morphological traits in Bosmina freyi regarding changes in environmental variables, the biomass of invertebrate predators, and algal food availability in two depths of the photic zone, the riverine zone, and near the dam zone (lacustrine zone) in The Riogrande II reservoir. In 200 individuals of B. freyi, using the software TpsDig2 we measured the body size, mucron and antennule lengths, and the antennule aperture percentage. Using the Mann-Whitney U test, we assessed the differences between these traits considering the zones and the photic depths; however, we used a 1763 canonical discriminant analysis with morphologic traits and environmental variables. Measured morphological traits showed a heterogeneous distribution between sampled zones and depths (p < 0.05). The highest values mucron and antennule lengths and the smallest antennule aperture angle were observed on small body size individuals, associated with physical, chemical, and biological characteristics in the riverine zone and the subsurface. Size structure distribution in B. freyi was related to changes in water temperature, trophic state, depredation, availability, and quality of food, of which implications related to the zooplankton community structure, predator-prey relations, and energy flow in the reservoir. Key words: Cladocera, predation, size structure, trophic state.
    [Show full text]
  • Zooplankton Grazing on Natural Algae and Bacteria Under Hypertrophic Conditions
    Limnetica, 29 (2): x-xx (2011) Limnetica, 34 (2): 541-560 (2015). DOI: 10.23818/limn.34.40 c Asociación Ibérica de Limnología, Madrid. Spain. ISSN: 0213-8409 Zooplankton grazing on natural algae and bacteria under hypertrophic conditions Gabriela Onandia1,∗, Juliana D. Dias2 and Maria Rosa Miracle1 1 Departamento de Microbiología y Ecología, ICBiBE, Universidad de Valencia, Calle Dr. Moliner 50, E-46100 Burjassot (Valencia), España. 2 Nupélia, Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil. ∗ Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Received: 24/11/14 Accepted: 04/08/15 ABSTRACT Zooplankton grazing on natural algae and bacteria under hypertrophic conditions The grazing characteristics of the natural zooplankton community in the shallow hypertrophic lagoon Albufera de Valencia (Spain) were compared in two periods of the annual cycle: (1) at the onset of spring, after a period of increased water flow through the lagoon that reduces phytoplankton density and cyanobacterial prevalence, and (2) in mid-spring, after the spring phytoplankton bloom and under conditions of cyanobacterial dominance. Clearance, ingestion and assimilation rates were measured by labelling natural seston with 14C-bicarbonate and 3H-thymidine/leucine. The clearance rates (CRs) of Daphnia magna, the dominant species at the onset of spring, were low, very likely as a consequence of the high abundance of filamentous cyanobacteria in the lagoon. The CRs were nearly equal for phytoplankton and bacteria, corroborating the unselective feeding of Daphnia. Bacteria supplied ≈ 40 % of the planktonic carbon ingested by D. magna, and this carbon was assimilated with the same efficiency as that provided by phytoplankton.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Littoral Macrophytes Influence Crustacean Zooplankton Distribution?
    Limnetica 23(1-2) 11/10/04 10:10 Página 57 57 Do Littoral Macrophytes Influence Crustacean Zooplankton Distribution? 1 2* A. M. Geraldes & M. J. Boavida 1 CIMO, Escola Superior Agrária de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia 5301-885 Bragança, Portugal ([email protected]) 2 Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande C8, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal ([email protected]) * Author for correspondence ABSTRACT In a meso-eutrophic reservoir, cladoceran and copepod assemblages were characterised in two sampling sites: One located in the pelagic zone (site 1) and the other in the shallow littoral zone (site 2), the latter colonised by emergent macrophytes. Samples were collected biweekly from June to July 2001 and from May to July 2002 at the two sites. At site 1, crustacean zooplankton samples were obtained by vertical hauls using a Wisconsin type net of 64 mm mesh size. At site 2 several random samples were obtained using a van Dorn bottle. Those samples were pooled together and the total sample was sieved through a 64 mm mesh size. Macrophyte relative abundance for each species was visually estimated. Macrophyte community was composed of Glyceria declinata, Eleocharis palustris and Carex sp. A Mann-Whitney U-test was carried out to test for statistically significant differences between sites, for environmental parameters and crustacean zooplankton species densities. Alona rectangula, Alona costata, Alona quadrangularis and Chydorus sphaericus were only found in littoral samples. Daphnia longispina, Daphnia pulex, Ceriodaphnia pulchella, Bosmina longirostris, Diaphanosoma brachyurum, Copidodiaptomus numidicus, and Acanthocyclops robustus were found at both sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Cladocera: Bosminidae), Based on Evidence from Male Morphological Characters and Molecular Phylogenies
    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 156, 1–51. With 27 figures Revision of the genus Bosmina Baird, 1845 (Cladocera: Bosminidae), based on evidence from male morphological characters and molecular phylogenies ALEXEY A. KOTOV1*, SEIJI ISHIDA2 and DEREK J. TAYLOR2 1A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Leninsky Prospect 33, Moscow 119071, Russia 2Department of Biological Sciences, The State University of New York at Buffalo, 109 Cooke Hall Buffalo, NY 14260, USA Received 25 December 2007; accepted for publication 21 April 2008 The systematics of the freshwater crustacean genus Bosmina Baird, 1845 (Anomopoda: Bosminidae) is notoriously confused. Part of the problem stems from a lack of characters in this cyclic parthenogen. We aimed to remedy this problem by scoring male morphological characters (previously described in just a few species), and by estimating molecular phylogenies. More specifically, the goals of this investigation are: (1) a detailed description of the adult males of Bosmina species; (2) a study of the changes of male characters during the postembryonic development in different subgenera; (3) an analysis of the taxonomical value of male characters; and (4) the estimation of a phylogenetic tree based on male characters and genetic characters from mitochondrial 16S rDNA and nuclear rDNA-internal transcribed spacers (ITS) gene sequences. We redescribed males of ten species: Bosmina (Bosmina) longirostris (O. F. Müller, 1785); Bosmina (Bosmina) liederi De Melo & Hebert, 1994; Bosmina (Sinobosmina) fatalis Burckhardt, 1924; Bosmina (Sinobosmina) cf. fatalis cyanopotamia Burckhardt, 1924; Bosmina (Liedero- bosmina) meridionalis Sars, 1904; Bosmina (Liederobosmina) cf. hagmanni Stingelin, 1904; Bosmina (Luno- bosmina) oriens (De Melo & Hebert, 1994); palaearctic Bosmina (Eubosmina) cf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Noncosmopolitanism Paradigm of Freshwater Zooplankton
    Molecular Ecology (2009) 18, 5161–5179 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04422.x The noncosmopolitanism paradigm of freshwater zooplankton: insights from the global phylogeography of the predatory cladoceran Polyphemus pediculus (Linnaeus, 1761) (Crustacea, Onychopoda) S. XU,* P. D. N. HEBERT,† A. A. KOTOV‡ and M. E. CRISTESCU* *Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada N9B 3P4, †Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1, ‡A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Leninsky Prospect 33, Moscow 119071, Russia Abstract A major question in our understanding of eukaryotic biodiversity is whether small bodied taxa have cosmopolitan distributions or consist of geographically localized cryptic taxa. Here, we explore the global phylogeography of the freshwater cladoceran Polyphemus pediculus (Linnaeus, 1761) (Crustacea, Onychopoda) using two mitochon- drial genes, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and 16s ribosomal RNA, and one nuclear marker, 18s ribosomal RNA. The results of neighbour-joining and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses reveal an exceptionally pronounced genetic structure at both inter- and intra- continental scales. The presence of well-supported, deeply divergent phylogroups across the Holarctic suggests that P. pediculus represents an assemblage of at least nine, largely allopatric cryptic species. Interestingly, all phylogenetic analyses support the reciprocal paraphyly of Nearctic and Palaearctic clades. Bayesian inference of ancestral distribu- tions suggests that P. pediculus originated in North America or East Asia and that European lineages of Polyphemus were established by subsequent intercontinental dispersal events from North America. Japan and the Russian Far East harbour exceptionally high levels of genetic diversity at both regional and local scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Guide to Identifying Freshwater Crustacean Zooplankton
    Practical Guide to Identifying Freshwater Crustacean Zooplankton Cooperative Freshwater Ecology Unit 2004, 2nd edition Practical Guide to Identifying Freshwater Crustacean Zooplankton Lynne M. Witty Aquatic Invertebrate Taxonomist Cooperative Freshwater Ecology Unit Department of Biology, Laurentian University 935 Ramsey Lake Road Sudbury, Ontario, Canada P3E 2C6 http://coopunit.laurentian.ca Cooperative Freshwater Ecology Unit 2004, 2nd edition Cover page diagram credits Diagrams of Copepoda derived from: Smith, K. and C.H. Fernando. 1978. A guide to the freshwater calanoid and cyclopoid copepod Crustacea of Ontario. University of Waterloo, Department of Biology. Ser. No. 18. Diagram of Bosminidae derived from: Pennak, R.W. 1989. Freshwater invertebrates of the United States. Third edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. Diagram of Daphniidae derived from: Balcer, M.D., N.L. Korda and S.I. Dodson. 1984. Zooplankton of the Great Lakes: A guide to the identification and ecology of the common crustacean species. The University of Wisconsin Press. Madison, Wisconsin. Diagrams of Chydoridae, Holopediidae, Leptodoridae, Macrothricidae, Polyphemidae, and Sididae derived from: Dodson, S.I. and D.G. Frey. 1991. Cladocera and other Branchiopoda. Pp. 723-786 in J.H. Thorp and A.P. Covich (eds.). Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press. San Diego. ii Acknowledgements Since the first edition of this manual was published in 2002, several changes have occurred within the field of freshwater zooplankton taxonomy. Many thanks go to Robert Girard of the Dorset Environmental Science Centre for keeping me apprised of these changes and for graciously putting up with my never ending list of questions. I would like to thank Julie Leduc for updating the list of zooplankton found within the Sudbury Region, depicted in Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of the Bosmina (Cladocera: Bosminidae) in China, Revealed by Analysis of Two Genetic Markers (Mtdna 16S and a Nuclear
    Wang et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2019) 19:145 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1474-4 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Diversity of the Bosmina (Cladocera: Bosminidae) in China, revealed by analysis of two genetic markers (mtDNA 16S and a nuclear ITS) Liufu Wang, Hang Zhuang, Yingying Zhang and Wenzhi Wei* Abstract Background: China is an important biogeographical zone in which the genetic legacies of the Tertiary and Quaternary periods are abundant, and the contemporary geography environment plays an important role in species distribution. Therefore, many biogeographical studies have focused on the organisms of the region, especially zooplankton, which is essential in the formation of biogeographical principles. Moreover, the generality of endemism also reinforces the need for detailed regional studies of zooplankton. Bosmina, a group of cosmopolitan zooplankton, is difficult to identify by morphology, and no genetic data are available to date to assess this species complex in China. In this study, 48 waterbodies were sampled covering a large geographical and ecological range in China, the goal of this research is to explore the species distribution of Bosmina across China and to reveal the genetic information of this species complex, based on two genetic markers (a mtDNA 16S and a nuclear ITS). The diversity of taxa in the Bosmina across China was investigated using molecular tools for the first time. Results: Two main species were detected in 35 waterbodies: an endemic east Asia B. fatalis, and the B. longirostris that has a Holarctic distribution. B. fatalis had lower genetic polymorphism and population differentiation than B. longirostris. B. fatalis was preponderant in central and eastern China, whereas B.
    [Show full text]