Extensions of Remarks Hon.Thomasj.Downey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Extensions of Remarks Hon.Thomasj.Downey 22594 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS September 30, 1981 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS SUGAR LOAN PROGRAM protection from various international hob­ that it lasted for a grand total of 5 weeks, goblins that are said to lurk in the world and that is the honest to goodness fact. sugar market. In the entire last decade the world price HON.THOMASJ.DOWNEY Of course, the most ferocious of these of sugar exceeded 60 cents a pound for the OF NEW YORK hobgoblins is an OPEC sugar cartel, some­ grand total of 35 days. As a matter of fact, IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES thing which we are told will spring up during the entire last decade the price of sphinx-like if the U.S. production base world sugar exceeded 30 cents a pound for Wednesday, September 30, 1981 erodes even marginally. only 7 months. e Mr. DOWNEY. Mr. Speaker, in the The problem is that cartels can fix artifi­ The point I am trying to make here very next few days we will be considering cially high prices if, and only if, they can simply is yes, you had a very short period of the farm bill, and with it the question drastically curtail production or control pro­ instability in the market when the futures of whether or not to approve a billion duction. The odds of that happening in the price was bid up, when Congress refused to world sugar market are about of the same extend the old program, but the underlying dollar sugar loan program. I think it order as of eradicating ragweed. fundamentals of the industry and the world would be of great help to my col­ Sugar is grown in 83 countries. It is ex­ market are such that there is endemic leagues in anticipating this question to ported by 47. It is produced in regions from excess production capacity or potential for consider the wisdom of our former col­ Norway to Australia. It can be grown in sugar production in the world and that is league, Budget Director David Stock­ practically every climate, topography and going to hold the sugar price in the future man, when he sat with us in this body soil imaginable, and more importantly, since much closer to the 12 or 15 cents per pound 2 years ago during a similar consider­ we are referencing the argument to OPEC, level that it is at today than the 16 to 20 ation of the farm bill. The enlight­ unlike the case of oil, in which it took cents provided for in this bill, and most cer­ mother nature 100 million years to lay down tainly than the harrow stories of 60 cents or ened, free-market sentiments ex­ 60 percent of the world's reserves in a $1 per pound sugar that is being warned pressed so well by our distinguished narrow strip of sand around the Persian about by its backers. colleague on that occasion can, I Gulf, sugar production can be increased dra­ I want to talk about the third consumer think, serve as a beacon to us all in the matically in a matter of 1, 2, or 3 years in benefit that we are supposed to get from coming debate. dozens of regions around the world. this bill; namely, protection of our economy With that view in mind, Mr. Speak­ In response to these high prices that we and our consumers from the stupidity of er, I would like to insert the full text have heard about in 1974 and 1975, for in­ foreign producers who insist on dumping of Mr. Stockman's landmark speech stance, U.S. acreage of sugar acreage alone sugar on our market below the cost of pro­ expanded 27 percent within the course of duction. Since dumping is a form of income on sugar price supports in the RECORD less than two growing seasons. transfer of what we call foreign aid, I am for the illumination of my colleagues. In short, the point is a sugar cartel cannot wondering just who the countries are, what Mr. Stockman's speech follows: be created because there are too many pro­ foreign principalities really engage in this Mr. STOCKMAN. Mr. Chairman, I move to ducers to begin with an artificially high over a sustained period of time. The fact is strike the last word. prices cannot be sustained for any reasona­ there has not been any evidence presented Mr. Chairman, if some of the Members of ble period of time because the production to show that. the House are confused on this amendment, response is too elastic. We keep hearing about how the price in let me suggest a simple formula to resolve The second benefit we are supposed to France or Denmark or Japan is 40 or 50 their doubt. get, the consumer, the American economy is cents a pound but those are net importers, Flip a coin on the Frenzel amendment and supposed to get for this very high insurance not exporters. The reason the price is so then vote "no" on final passage, regardless premium we are being asked to pay, is pro­ high internally is they support their domes­ of the outcome; because the fact is this tection from an unstable market and, as we tic industry at that very high level. If we amendment involves nothing more than an heard a moment ago, from the threat that want to talk about dumping we have to look intramural debate about which pocket to without a sugar program prices might sky­ at the net exporters, the Philippines, Brazil, fleece, the tax pocket via direct payments; rocket through the ceiling and reach 60 Mexico, South Africa. Their internal prices and the gentleman from Minnesota <Mr. cents a pound again or even $1 a pound. are the same as the world price. They sell FRENZEL) is against that, and I commend I think the point here is very simple. both on the spot market and long-term con­ him for it; or the consumer expense pocket Beware of price fixers bearing gifts of tract market. The long-term contracts, for via higher price supports and tariff levels. Market stability and consumer protection. the most part, except for the convention, I would suggest to the House that the im­ As a matter of fact, I would suggest we are tied to the future price and spot market portant matter here is that in the final amend that old story about the three great­ price of sugar. The fact is there is a work­ analysis it really does not matter which est lies to include: First, "My check is in the able world sugar market out there that is pocket you fleece, because either way, the mail"; second, "This will only hurt a not subject to the influence of all these hob­ American economy and the consumer tax­ second"; and third, "My plan will protect goblins we hear about. payers will end up paying up to $4 billion you from high prices." What we have before us is a proposal that extra for sugar over the next 4 or 5 years The fact is all price fixing, all market rig­ merely is aimed at a few thousand marginal and for absolutely no good reason. ging schemes are designed to stabilize the producers, a very small slice of American ag­ Now, the simple, unvarnished purpose of price, of course. Even Mr. Yamani says he is riculture, that do not want to have to adjust this bill is to prevent low-cost foreign im­ ravaging our economy today to spare us or move acreage into some other productive ported sugar from gaining a larger share of from an even worse fate tomorrow. endeavor. the U.S. market and thereby assure that But these price fixing, stabilizing schemes I would just remind the committee in the every last acre, every plow, every harvesting are not designed to minimize costs to con­ last 4 years, and this is an astounding machine and every processing plant now de­ sumers. They are not designed to maximize figure, but in the last 4 years we have seen voted to domestic sugar production remains production efficiency. an expansion of the production of sunflow­ profitable and competitive under the artifi­ The CHAIRMAN. The time of the gentle­ ers from 400,000 acres to 4 million acres cial protection of a high-tariff umbrella. man from Michigan has expired. which came out of something that was Thus, the fundamental issue that this legis­ <By unanimous consent Mr. STOCKMAN was being produced there before that was not as lation poses to the House is very simple. allowed to proceed for 4 additional min­ profitable. That expansion in 4 years is What does the American economy, or utes.) twice all of the acreage we have in sugar in what do the great bulk of American con­ Mr. STOCKMAN. No, they are designed to the entire country. sumers get from this billion-dollar insurance protect market shares, profits, and lessen So what the choice here today really is program designed to prop up the domestic competitive discipline in the industry in­ not between pro-producer or anti-consumer, sugar industry? volved. the choice really is find a progressive eco­ The answer, the only one that I can detect Let me refer to this 60-cent price we had nomic policy that recognizes that our re­ as I read the propaganda for this bill, is that in 1975 and we have been warned will sources are our acreage, our capital, our in the spirit of the Halloween season upon happen again if we do not have a sugar pro­ labor has to shift as market conditions us, the American consumer will get some gram.
Recommended publications
  • Monica Prasad Northwestern University Department of Sociology
    SPRING 2016 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW COLLOQUIUM ON TAX POLICY AND PUBLIC FINANCE “The Popular Origins of Neoliberalism in the Reagan Tax Cut of 1981” Monica Prasad Northwestern University Department of Sociology May 3, 2016 Vanderbilt-208 Time: 4:00-5:50 pm Number 14 SCHEDULE FOR 2016 NYU TAX POLICY COLLOQUIUM (All sessions meet on Tuesdays from 4-5:50 pm in Vanderbilt 208, NYU Law School) 1. January 19 – Eric Talley, Columbia Law School. “Corporate Inversions and the unbundling of Regulatory Competition.” 2. January 26 – Michael Simkovic, Seton Hall Law School. “The Knowledge Tax.” 3. February 2 – Lucy Martin, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Political Science. “The Structure of American Income Tax Policy Preferences.” 4. February 9 – Donald Marron, Urban Institute. “Should Governments Tax Unhealthy Foods and Drinks?" 5. February 23 – Reuven S. Avi-Yonah, University of Michigan Law School. “Evaluating BEPS” 6. March 1 – Kevin Markle, University of Iowa Business School. “The Effect of Financial Constraints on Income Shifting by U.S. Multinationals.” 7. March 8 – Theodore P. Seto, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles. “Preference-Shifting and the Non-Falsifiability of Optimal Tax Theory.” 8. March 22 – James Kwak, University of Connecticut School of Law. “Reducing Inequality With a Retrospective Tax on Capital.” 9. March 29 – Miranda Stewart, The Australian National University. “Transnational Tax Law: Fiction or Reality, Future or Now?” 10. April 5 – Richard Prisinzano, U.S. Treasury Department, and Danny Yagan, University of California at Berkeley Economics Department, et al. “Business In The United States: Who Owns It And How Much Tax Do They Pay?” 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Program and Abstracts of 2017 Congress / Programme Et Résumés
    1 Sponsors | Commanditaires Gold Sponsors | Commanditaires d’or Silver Sponsors | Commanditaires d’argent Other Sponsors | Les autres Commanditaires 2 Contents Sponsors | Commanditaires .......................................................................................................................... 2 Welcome from the Premier of Ontario .......................................................................................................... 5 Bienvenue du premier ministre de l'Ontario .................................................................................................. 6 Welcome from the Mayor of Toronto ............................................................................................................ 7 Mot de bienvenue du maire de Toronto ........................................................................................................ 8 Welcome from the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard ...................................... 9 Mot de bienvenue de ministre des Pêches, des Océans et de la Garde côtière canadienne .................... 10 Welcome from the Minister of Environment and Climate Change .............................................................. 11 Mot de bienvenue du Ministre d’Environnement et Changement climatique Canada ................................ 12 Welcome from the President of the Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society ...................... 13 Mot de bienvenue du président de la Société canadienne de météorologie et d’océanographie .............
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Missouri Agriculture During the Reagan Years A
    The University of Missouri Agriculture During the Reagan Years A Dissertation Submitted to The Faculty of the Department of History In Candidacy For The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Jay Ward Columbia, Missouri May 2015 Copyright 2015 by Jay Woodward Ward All rights reserved. The undersigned, appointed by the Dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled Agriculture During the Reagan Years Presented by Jay Woodward Ward In Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. ______________________________________________________________________ Dr. Robert Collins ______________________________________________________________________ Dr. Mark Carroll ______________________________________________________________________ Dr. John Frymire _______________________________________________________________________ Dr. Catherine Rymph _______________________________________________________________________ Dr. Patrick Westhoff Dedication To Rose, Kelly, Brian, Janelle, Mickey, Lauren, Payton, Addison, Evelynne, and Gibson— the center of my world. Acknowledgements I owe undying gratitude to my advisor, Professor Robert M. Collins, who is a renowned scholar and an award-winning teacher, and without whose patient guidance I could not have completed this remarkable journey. I also want to thank my committee, Professor Mark Carroll, Professor John Frymire, Professor Catherine Rymph, and Professor Patrick Westhoff, all of whom lent me their considerable expertise and wisdom, but more importantly to me, they treated this very non-traditional student with extraordinary kindness. And my gratitude to my sister, Deborah Haseltine, my computer expert, who always was able to lead me out of the morasses into which I stumbled almost every time I sat down at the computer. ii Contents Acknowledgements ii List of Tables iv Introduction 1 Chapter 1. The Second Agricultural Revolution 20 Chapter 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Scale Impacts
    Global Scale Impacts Erik Asphaug Arizona State University Gareth Collins Imperial College, London Martin Jutzi University of Bern Global scale impacts modify the physical or thermal state of a substantial fraction of a target asteroid. Specific effects include accretion, family formation, reshaping, mixing and layering, shock and frictional heating, fragmentation, material compaction, dilatation, stripping of mantle and crust, and seismic degradation. Deciphering the complicated record of global scale impacts, in asteroids and meteorites, will lead us to understand the original planet-forming process and its resultant populations, and their evolution in time as collisions became faster and fewer. We provide a brief overview of these ideas, and an introduction to models. 1. Introduction v1 < v2 are the velocities of the target and projectile in the center of mass frame. If the energy is sufficiently intense, The most important parameter governing the global ex- Q > Q , then shattering occurs, breaking the solid bonds tent of an impact is the mass ratio of the projectile to the S∗ of the asteroid into pieces no larger than M =2. If gravita- target, γ = M =M . In the case of a cratering event this 1 2 1 tionally bound (ejected at < v ) then shattering produces ratio is small, and there is a well-defined geometric locus. esc a rubble pile as defined below; otherwise if fragments are Crater scaling then becomes a powerful tool (e.g. Housen escaping, the result is a collection of new asteroids. This et al. 1983) that allows simple analytical approaches to be is the classic example of hitting something so hard that applied to determine whether an impact ‘goes global’ – for you break it.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Alvarez,Professor
    DEPARTMENT OF EARTH & PLANETARY SCIENCE DEPARTMENT UPDATE 2017 -2018 FROM THE CHAIR WELCOME TO OUR ANNUAL UPDATE write this introduction after returning from our summer geology field camp. What a treat. I met many of the students when they took their first geoscience class, EPS 50. The capstone field course showed how much these new alumni Ihave grown during their time in EPS to develop into creative and talented geoscientists. On page 13 we hear from one of our 66 new graduates, Departmental Citation recipient Theresa Sawi, about her efforts to understand how earthquakes influence volcanic eruptions. Our faculty, students, staff and alumni continue to make our department one of the world’s best. Our newest faculty member, Bethanie Edwards (page 3), broadens the department’s expertise to include marine biogeochemistry. Along with the arrival of Bill Boos and Daniel Stolper two years ago, we continue to expand our efforts to understand all MARINE SCIENCE aspects of Earth’s changing climate. GET TO KNOW OUR FACULTY There have also been some losses. After 36 years, Tim Teague retired. He may be irreplaceable, but we will try. After three years of dedicated service, always with a smile, Richard Allen’s term as chair ended, and he will continue to direct the Seismological Laboratory. Mark Richards moved to Seattle where he is the University of Washington’s provost. Accolades continue to pour in, and I highlight a few. The American Geophysical Union recognized recent Alumnus Leif BETHANIE EDWARDS Karlstrom with the Kuno Award (page 16) and Professor David Romps with the Atmospheric Sciences Ascent award.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Lunar and Martian Nomenclature
    APPENDIX I LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE A large number of names of craters and other features on the Moon and Mars, were accepted by the IAU General Assemblies X (Moscow, 1958), XI (Berkeley, 1961), XII (Hamburg, 1964), XIV (Brighton, 1970), and XV (Sydney, 1973). The names were suggested by the appropriate IAU Commissions (16 and 17). In particular the Lunar names accepted at the XIVth and XVth General Assemblies were recommended by the 'Working Group on Lunar Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr D. H. Menzel. The Martian names were suggested by the 'Working Group on Martian Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr G. de Vaucouleurs. At the XVth General Assembly a new 'Working Group on Planetary System Nomenclature' was formed (Chairman: Dr P. M. Millman) comprising various Task Groups, one for each particular subject. For further references see: [AU Trans. X, 259-263, 1960; XIB, 236-238, 1962; Xlffi, 203-204, 1966; xnffi, 99-105, 1968; XIVB, 63, 129, 139, 1971; Space Sci. Rev. 12, 136-186, 1971. Because at the recent General Assemblies some small changes, or corrections, were made, the complete list of Lunar and Martian Topographic Features is published here. Table 1 Lunar Craters Abbe 58S,174E Balboa 19N,83W Abbot 6N,55E Baldet 54S, 151W Abel 34S,85E Balmer 20S,70E Abul Wafa 2N,ll7E Banachiewicz 5N,80E Adams 32S,69E Banting 26N,16E Aitken 17S,173E Barbier 248, 158E AI-Biruni 18N,93E Barnard 30S,86E Alden 24S, lllE Barringer 29S,151W Aldrin I.4N,22.1E Bartels 24N,90W Alekhin 68S,131W Becquerei
    [Show full text]
  • In Pdf Format
    lós 1877 Mik 88 ge N 18 e N i h 80° 80° 80° ll T 80° re ly a o ndae ma p k Pl m os U has ia n anum Boreu bal e C h o A al m re u c K e o re S O a B Bo l y m p i a U n d Planum Es co e ria a l H y n d s p e U 60° e 60° 60° r b o r e a e 60° l l o C MARS · Korolev a i PHOTOMAP d n a c S Lomono a sov i T a t n M 1:320 000 000 i t V s a Per V s n a s l i l epe a s l i t i t a s B o r e a R u 1 cm = 320 km lkin t i t a s B o r e a a A a A l v s l i F e c b a P u o ss i North a s North s Fo d V s a a F s i e i c a a t ssa l vi o l eo Fo i p l ko R e e r e a o an u s a p t il b s em Stokes M ic s T M T P l Kunowski U 40° on a a 40° 40° a n T 40° e n i O Va a t i a LY VI 19 ll ic KI 76 es a As N M curi N G– ra ras- s Planum Acidalia Colles ier 2 + te .
    [Show full text]
  • A Concept for the Deployment of a Large
    i-SAIRAS2020-Papers (2020) 5072.pdf A CONCEPT FOR THE DEPLOYMENT OF A LARGE LUNAR CRATER RADIO TELESCOPE USING TEAMS OF TETHERED ROBOTS Virtual Conference 19–23 October 2020 Patrick McGarey1*, Saptarshi Bandyopadhyay1†, Ramin Rafizadeh1, Ashish Goel1, Manan Arya1, Issa Nesnas1, Joe Lazio1, Paul Goldsmith1, Adrian Stoica1, Marco Quadrelli1, Gregg Hallinan2 1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA, USA 91109 *[email protected], †[email protected] 2Astronomy Department, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Blvd, Pasadena, CA, USA 91125 ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION Kilometer-scale craters on the far side of the Moon have unique potential as future locations for large ra- dio telescopes, which can observe the universe at wavelengths and frequencies (>10 m, < 30 MHz) not possible with conventional Earth or orbital-based ap- proaches. Distinct advantages of building a Lunar Crater Radio Telescope (LCRT) on the far side include i) isolation from radio noise due to the Earth’s iono- sphere, orbiting satellites, and the Sun, ii) days of un- interrupted dark/cold sky viewing during lunar night, and iii) terrain geometry naturally suited for con- structing the largest mesh antenna structure in the So- lar System. A key challenge to constructing LCRT on the Moon is related to the complexity of deploying a Figure 1: Illustration of the Lunar Crater Radio Tele- 1-km diameter antenna and hanging receiver within a scope (LCRT) concept. The green antenna reflector is lunar crater whose diameter, depth, and slope are 3-5 shown suspended by lift wires just below a suspended km, 1 km, and ~30 degrees respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • PERO Proposal
    _ i b '’ V '•• •• , .1 ’ ^ V ' ' ■■• ; ■■ FRIDAY, JANUARY #1, 1»64 «® SEOTSEN V jStanrlt^Btfr lEwning li^rald Aierafg Dally Net Pteas Kne Far tlw WMk DaM servloes o f the UJB. C on fer­ Auraaiy 95^ 1964 The VTW Poet will sponsor Course to Stop FORRBNT Rally Set Sunday ence of Mayors and to urge Rahi aadiag aatiiy seafood night from 6 to 12:80 Curtis Wants them to jedn. 8 and M mm. Marla. Piojaa- l ^ u t Town ajn. for membera and guests Manchester’s board of direc­ Smoking Plan tors—sound or sOnk Moo 13,881 85 «a‘ 46i.- eaaiair'L ^ By Youth Council $ 5 iwm. sUda projeoton, to n ig h t tors, earlier this month voted vuCUm AiMtt b r e ^ , aaU . M lgli 66 4a 9)1^1^ . 3fr. and Mrs. Gordon lUxdc- To Negotiate the town’s partlcipatian In the A ICMohester agency Is «• WELDON DRUG CO. I ad CXraiilattMi win ot 58 Marion Dr. will be John B. Cumer- HI, an en- TIm Manoheater Christian conference, at an annual ooat Maneh0$tmr^A Cky of Vlttagf Charm gineman third class ip the Unit­ peoted to ^Mosor a ‘Tlve-Oajr 901 Main SWVeL 948-5991 boat and hoetesa Sunday from Y outh OourcB wlH present its o f 8100. Plan to atop Smoking,” the » - 8 to 6 pjn. at the LuU Junior ed States Coast Guard and son Bus Contract Youth Week RaBy Service from Mayor Mahoney attended last ■ult of a meeting last idght at (CliaaWlad AdverUsfaig oa Paga 16) PRICE SEVEN CENTS Kuaeum.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES-Friday, July 23, 1993
    16818 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE July 23, 1993 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-Friday, July 23, 1993 The House met at 10 a.m. Coyne Kasi ch Pomeroy Grams Livingston Ros-Lehtinen The Chaplain, Rev. James David Cramer Kennedy Porter Grandy Machtley Roth Danner Kennelly Poshard Greenwood Manzullo Roukema Ford, D.D., offered the following Darden Kildee Price (NC) Hancock McColl um Royce prayer: de la Gan.a Kleczka Ra.ball Hansen McCrery Saxton 0 gracious God, as You have blessed Deal Klein Reed Hastert Mc Dade Schaefer DeLauro Klink Reynolds Hefley McHugh Schiff Your people with the potential for dis­ Dellums Kopetski Richardson Herger Mcinnis Sensenbrenner cernment in all things, we pray that we Derrick Kreidler Roemer Hobson McKeon Shaw will dedicate ourselves to use our Deutsch LaFalce Rose Hoekstra McMillan Shays words in ways that promote justice and Dicks Lambert Rostenkowski Hoke Meyers Shuster Dingell Lancaster Rowland Horn Mica Skeen encourage mercy and compassion, so Durbin Lantos Roybal-Allard Huffington Michel Smith(TX) our words unite us in understanding. Edwards (TX) LaRocco Sabo Hunter Miller (FL) Smith(MI) You have called us, O God, to be faith­ Engel Laughlin Sangmeister Hutchinson Molinari Smith(OR) English (AZ) Lehman Sa.rpa.lius Hyde Moorhead Snowe ful in all things and we pray that we English (OK) Levin Sawyer Inbofe Morella Solomon will translate that faithfulness into the Eshoo Lewis (GA) Schenk lstook Murphy Spence words we use so they do not become Evans Lipinski Schumer Jacobs Nussle Stearns weapons of discord, but vehicles of rec­ Farr Lloyd Scott Johnson (CT) Oxley Stump Fazio Long SeITano Kim Paxon Sundquist onciliation and sensitivity and toler­ Filner Lowey Sharp King Petri Talent ance.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks
    June 1, 1988 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 13187 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS A NEW PARTNERSHIP FOR democratic neighbors to resort to armed widely despised thug into a symbol of resist­ PLURALISM AND PROSPERITY force. ance to Yankee imperialism, and generate Had previous administrations accepted considerable concern on the part of our the essential truth of these propositions and allies abroad. HON. ROBERT G. TORRICELU acted accordingly, then perhaps we would Similarly, we must recognize that in Nica­ OF NEW JERSEY not now be saddled with a Sandinista regime ragua we have a far better chance of achiev­ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES in Nicaragua that has threatened the peace ing our objectives and advancing the cause and stability of Central America. Wednesday, June 1, 1988 of democracy at the negotiating table than Had earlier administrations more actively on the battlefield. Mr. TORRICELLI. Mr. Speaker, a few days promoted democracy in Cuba, then perhaps But while opposing the resumption of ago our colleague, the gentleman from New we would not now be faced with a Soviet military aid to the contras-both because it York [Mr. SOLARZ], delivered an address on ally 90 miles from our own shores. is counterproductive and because it sets a It is, of course, one thing to acknowledge dangerous precedent for interventionism the promotion and preservation of democracy the general desirability of democracy, and in Latin America before the Democratic elsewhere-we must not be indifferent to quite another to figure out the best way to the struggle of Nicaraguan democrats for Party's platform committee. promote and sustain it.
    [Show full text]