The Lindheimer Quarterly 3Rd Quarter 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Biodiversity Work Group Report: Appendices
Biodiversity Work Group Report: Appendices A: Initial List of Important Sites..................................................................................................... 2 B: An Annotated List of the Mammals of Albemarle County........................................................ 5 C: Birds ......................................................................................................................................... 18 An Annotated List of the Birds of Albemarle County.............................................................. 18 Bird Species Status Tables and Charts...................................................................................... 28 Species of Concern in Albemarle County............................................................................ 28 Trends in Observations of Species of Concern..................................................................... 30 D. Fish of Albemarle County........................................................................................................ 37 E. An Annotated Checklist of the Amphibians of Albemarle County.......................................... 41 F. An Annotated Checklist of the Reptiles of Albemarle County, Virginia................................. 45 G. Invertebrate Lists...................................................................................................................... 51 H. Flora of Albemarle County ...................................................................................................... 69 I. Rare -
Shadow Darner
Newsletter of the Wisconsin Dragonfly Society Wisconsin Odonata News Vol.3 Issue 2 Winter, 2015 Featured in this issue: WOS (Wisconsin Odonata Survey ) Bug o’ the Week: Shadow Darner Focus on Habitat: Retention Ponds WWBD?* (What Would Birders Do?) Project: Exuviae Collecting Fostering the appreciation, study and enjoyment of Wisconsin’s dragonflies and damselflies and the aquatic habitats on which they depend. Wisconsin Dragonfly Society CONTENTS Reflections and Intentions by Dan Jackson ……………………………...........3 Board Members Have YOU Been Taking Advantage of the Statewide Dragonfly and Damselfly Survey (WOS)? by Bob DuBois……………………………..………………....4 PRESIDENT Dan Jackson Planning your Dragonfly Field Trips? WWBD*? by Joanne Kline…………..5 [email protected] Every Journey Has a Beginning by Ryan Chrouser ………………………………….6 VICE-PRESIDENT Scenes from a field trip in Dunn County………………………………………………8 Ryan Chrouser [email protected] Focus on Habitat: Retention Ponds by Bob DuBois and Dan Jackson….…9 Nymph Identification Workshops by Freda van den Broek…… …………….. 10 RECORDING SECRETARY Carey Chrouser Bug o’the Week: Shadow Darner by Kate Redmond …………………………….11 [email protected] International Odonatological Research News ......................................13 TREASURER Project: Collecting Exuviae……………………………………………………….……..14 Matt Berg [email protected] Membership Matters …………………………………………………………………………… 16 AT LARGE ARGIA - Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………… 17 Robert DuBois Resources: Links, Books, Supplies……………………………………………………………. -
Distribution Patterns of Odonate Assemblages in Relation to Environmental Variables in Streams of South Korea
insects Article Distribution Patterns of Odonate Assemblages in Relation to Environmental Variables in Streams of South Korea Da-Yeong Lee 1, Dae-Seong Lee 1, Mi-Jung Bae 2, Soon-Jin Hwang 3 , Seong-Yu Noh 4, Jeong-Suk Moon 4 and Young-Seuk Park 1,5,* 1 Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea; [email protected] (D.-Y.L.); [email protected] (D.-S.L.) 2 Freshwater Biodiversity Research Bureau, Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources, Sangju, Gyeongsangbuk-do 37242, Korea; [email protected] 3 Department of Environmental Health Science, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea; [email protected] 4 Water Environment Research Department, Watershed Ecology Research Team, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Korea; [email protected] (S.-Y.N.); [email protected] (J.-S.M.) 5 Department of Life and Nanopharmaceutical Sciences, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-961-0946 Received: 20 September 2018; Accepted: 25 October 2018; Published: 29 October 2018 Abstract: Odonata species are sensitive to environmental changes, particularly those caused by humans, and provide valuable ecosystem services as intermediate predators in food webs. We aimed: (i) to investigate the distribution patterns of Odonata in streams on a nationwide scale across South Korea; (ii) to evaluate the relationships between the distribution patterns of odonates and their environmental conditions; and (iii) to identify indicator species and the most significant environmental factors affecting their distributions. Samples were collected from 965 sampling sites in streams across South Korea. We also measured 34 environmental variables grouped into six categories: geography, meteorology, land use, substrate composition, hydrology, and physicochemistry. -
A Survey of Odonata of the Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge and Management Area
2012. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 121(1):54–61 A SURVEY OF ODONATA OF THE PATOKA RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AND MANAGEMENT AREA Donald L. Batema* and Amanda Bellian: Department of Chemistry, Environmental Studies Program, University of Evansville, 1800 Lincoln Avenue, Evansville, IN 47722 USA Lindsey Landowski: Mingo National Wildlife Refuge, Puxico, MO. 63960 USA ABSTRACT. The Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge and Management Area (hereafter Patoka River Refuge or the Refuge) represents one of the largest intact bottomland hardwood forests in southern Indiana, with meandering oxbows, marshes, ponds, managed moist-soil units, and constructed wetlands that provide diverse and suitable habitat for wildlife. Refuge personnel strive to protect, restore, and manage this bottomland hardwood ecosystem and associated habitats for a variety of wildlife. The Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) lists many species of management priority (McCoy 2008), but Odonata are not included, even though they are known to occur on the Refuge. The absence of Odonata from the CCP is the result of lack of information about this ecologically important group of organisms. Therefore, we conducted a survey, from May to October 2009, to document their presence, with special attention being paid to rare, threatened, and endangered species. A total of 43 dragonfly and damselfly species were collected and identified. No threatened or endangered species were found on the Refuge, but three species were found that are considered imperiled in Indiana based on Nature Serve Ranks (Stein 2002). Additionally, 19 new odonate records were documented for Pike County, Indiana. The results of this survey will be used by Refuge personnel to assist in management decisions and to help establish priorities for the Patoka River Refuge activities and land acquisition goals. -
Dragonflies of Northern Virginia
WILDLIFE OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA Hayhurst’s Scallopwing Southern Broken-Dash Dreamy Duskywing Northern Broken-Dash Sleepy Duskywing Little Glassywing Juvenal’s Duskywing Sachem Horace’s Duskywing Delaware Skipper Wild Indigo Duskywing Hobomok Skipper Common Checkered Skipper Zabulon Skipper Common Sootywing Broad-winged Skipper Swarthy Skipper Dion Skipper Clouded Skipper Dun Skipper Least Skipper Dusted Skipper European Skipper Pepper and Salt Skipper Fiery Skipper Common Roadside Skipper Leonard’s Skipper Ocola Skipper Cobweb Skipper Peck’s Skipper Data Sources: H. Pavulaan, R. Smith, R. Smythe, Tawny-edged Skipper B. Steury (NPS), J. Waggener Crossline Skipper DRAGONFLIES OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA Following is a provisional list of dragonfly species that Other notations: shaded (species you should be able to might be found in appropriate habitats. find in a normal year). PETALTAILS (PETALURIDAE) Midland Clubtail Gray Petaltail Arrow Clubtail Russet-tipped Clubtail DARNERS (AESHNIDAE) Laura’s Clubtail Common Green Darner Elusive Clubtail Comet Darner Black-shouldered Spinyleg Swamp Darner Unicorn Clubtail Cyrano Darner Least Clubtail Harlequin Darner Southern Pygmy Clubtail Taper-tailed Darner Common Sanddragon Occelated Darner Eastern Ringtail Fawn Darner Springtime Darner SPIKETAILS (CORDULEGASTRIDAE) Shadow Darner Tiger Spiketail Twin-spotted Spiketail CLUBTAILS (GOMPHIDAE) Brown Spiketail Dragonhunter Arrowhead Spiketail Ashy Clubtail Lancet Clubtail CRUISERS (MACROMIIDAE) Spine-crowned -
By the Lepidoptera (Eg Patterns Are Frequently Used
Odonatologica 15(3): 335-345 September I, 1986 A survey of some Odonata for ultravioletpatterns* D.F.J. Hilton Department of Biological Sciences, Bishop’s University, Lennoxville, Quebec, J1M 1Z7, Canada Received May 8, 1985 / Revised and Accepted March 3, 1986 series of 338 in families A museum specimens comprising spp. 118 genera and 16 were photographed both with and without a Kodak 18-A ultraviolet (UV) filter. These photographs revealed that only Euphaeaamphicyana reflected UV from its other wings whereas all spp. either did not absorb UV (e.g. 94.5% of the Coenagri- did In with flavescent. onidae) or so to varying degrees. particular, spp. orange or brown UV these wings (or wing patches) exhibited absorption for same areas. However, other spp. with nearly transparent wings (especially certain Gomphidae) Pruinose also had strong UV absorption. body regions reflected UV but the standard acetone treatment for color preservation dissolves thewax particles of the pruinosity and destroys UV reflectivity. As is typical for arthropod cuticle, non-pruinosebody regions absorbed UV and this obscured whatever color patterns might otherwise be visible without the camera’s UV filter. Frequently there is sexual dimorphismin UV and and these role various of patterns (wings body) differences may play a in aspects mating behavior. INTRODUCTION Considerable attention has been paid to the various ultraviolet (UV) patterns exhibited by the Lepidoptera (e.g. SCOTT, 1973). Studies have shown (e.g. RUTOWSKI, 1981) that differing UV-reflectance patterns are frequently used as visual in various of behavior. few insect cues aspects mating Although a other groups have been investigated for the presence of UV patterns (HINTON, 1973; POPE & HINTON, 1977; S1LBERGL1ED, 1979), little informationis available for the Odonata. -
A Checklist of North American Odonata
A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009. Copyright © 2009 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 edition published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Tramea carolina (Carolina Saddlebags), Cabin Lake, Aiken Co., South Carolina, 13 May 2008, Dennis Paulson. 1 1724 NE 98 Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 457 species of North American Odonata considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approxi- mate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION Before the first edition of this checklist there was no re- Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, cent checklist of North American Odonata. Muttkows- with number of species. ki (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Zygoptera and Anisoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Westfall and May (2006) and Needham, West- fall, and May (2000), respectively, but some changes Calopterygidae 2 8 in nomenclature have been made subsequently. Davies Lestidae 2 19 and Tobin (1984, 1985) listed the world odonate fauna Coenagrionidae 15 103 but did not include type localities or details of distri- Platystictidae 1 1 bution. -
A Checklist of North American Odonata
A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2011 Edition A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2011 Edition Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009; updated February 2011. Copyright © 2011 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 and 2011 editions published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Lestes eurinus (Amber-winged Spreadwing), S of Newburg, Phelps Co., Missouri, 21 June 2009, Dennis Paulson. 1 1724 NE 98th Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 461 species of North American Odonata considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approxi- mate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION Before the first edition of this checklist there was no re- Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, cent checklist of North American Odonata. Muttkows- with number of species. ki (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Zygoptera and Anisoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Westfall and May (2006) and Needham, West- fall, and May (2000), respectively, but some changes Calopterygidae 2 8 in nomenclature have been made subsequently. Davies Lestidae 2 19 and Tobin (1984, 1985) listed the world odonate fauna Coenagrionidae 15 105 but did not include type localities or details of distri- Platystictidae 1 1 bution. -
Odonata: Gomphidae)
International Dragonfly Fund - Report 36 (2011): 1-9 1 Notes on three species of gomphid dragonflies from Vietnam (Odonata: Gomphidae) Do Manh Cuong 409 – 57A, 22/20 Nguyen Cong Hoan, Hanoi, Vietnam Email: [email protected] Abstract First records for Vietnam of Fukienogomphus promineus Chao, 1954 and Gomphidia abbotti Williamson, 1908 are documented with emphasis on morphological details. The previously published record of Sieboldius gigas (Martin, 1904) in Do et al. (2011) has to be corrected into Megalogomphus sommeri (Selys, 1854). Introduction Gomphidae are a diverse Odonata family with 974 species in 92 genera distributed worldwide (Schorr & Paulson 2011). About 40 species are recorded from Vietnam (Do & Dang, 2007; Do & Bui, 2011). Species vary greatly in size with Davidius and Burmagomphus genera including the smallest species (e.g. D. truncus: abdomen length approximately 27 mm (Chao, 1995), while Megalogomphus, Ictinogomphus, and Fukienogomphus (F. promineus: approximately 50 mm; this paper) harbouring the largest ones. They inhabit many kinds of biotopes including forest streams in lowland and highland, rivers, opened streams, swamps, ponds or even paddy fields. Gomphidae in Vietnam include both rare and common species, and presently the regional checklist has to be updated every year following increasing efforts to study remote parts of the country. Many members of the family were described or pub- lished over 100 year ago in the country but have not been confirmed or rediscove- red. In this brief report, I update information on three Vietnamese gomphids collected during my field trips in 2010. A comparative analysis with conspecific species from China is prepared too. 2 Three Gomphidae from Vietnam Fukienogomphus promineus Chao, 1954 Specimens: ♂ Mau Son, Lang Son Province, 20.V. -
A NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY of MIFFLIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA June 2007
A NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY OF MIFFLIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA June 2007 Prepared by: Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program Western Pennsylvania Conservancy 208 Airport Drive Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 Submitted to: Mifflin County Planning Commission 20 North Wayne Street Lewistown, PA 17044 This project was funded in part by a state grant from the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Wild Resource Conservation Program. Additional support was provided by the Department of Community & Economic Development. Additional funding was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through State Wildlife Grants program grant T-2, administered through the Pennsylvania Game Commission and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission. ii A Natural Heritage Inventory of Mifflin County, Pennsylvania 2007 Prepared by: Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program (PNHP) Western Pennsylvania Conservancy (WPC) 208 Airport Drive Middletown, PA 17057 Donna Bowers, Administration Lucy Boyce, Seasonal Field Ecologist Anthony F. Davis, Senior Ecologist Jeremy Deeds, Aquatic Zoology Coordinator Alice Doolittle, Conservation Assistant Charlie Eichelberger, Herpetologist Kathy Derge Gipe, Herpetologist William (Rocky) Gleason, County Inventory Coordinator Jim Hart, Mammalogist Rita Hawrot, Terrestrial Zoology Coordinator Denise Johnson, Assistant County Inventory Ecologist Susan Klugman, Conservation Information Manager John Kunsman, Senior Botanist Betsy Ray Leppo, Invertebrate Zoologist Trina Morris, County Inventory Ecologist Betsy Nightingale, Aquatic -
Focus Group on Status and Trends and Red List Assessment Final Report
Focus Group on Status and Trends and Red List Assessment Final Report 1. Relevant Aichi Biodiversity targets Aichi Target 19 - Biodiversity Knowledge By 2020, knowledge, the science base and technologies relating to biodiversity, its values, functioning, status and trends, and the consequences of its loss, are improved, widely shared and transferred, and applied. Aichi Target 12 - Preventing Extinction By 2020, the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and their conservation status, particularly of those most in decline, has been improved and sustained. Other relevant Aichi Targets are 1 (Awareness of Biodiversity Values), 2 (Integration of Biodiversity Values) , 5 (Loss of Habitats), 6 (Sustainable Fisheries), 7 (Areas under Sustainable Management), 8 (Pollution), 9 (Invasive Alien Species), 11 (Protected Areas), 14 (Essential Ecosystem Services) and 20 (Resource Mobilisation) 2. Leaders - Dr Michael Lau (WWF-HK) and Prof. Yvonne Sadovy (HKU) 3. Key experts/stakeholders involved in the discussions (a) Within the Steering Committee/Working Groups - Dr Gary Ades (KFBG), Prof Put Ang Jr. (CUHK), Mr Simon Chan (AFCD), Dr Andy Cornish (WWF-International), Prof. David Dudgeon (HKU), Dr Billy Hau (HKU), Dr Roger Kendrick, Mr Kevin Laurie (Hong Kong Coast Watch), Ms Samantha Lee (WWF-HK), Ms Louise Li (AFCD), Dr Ng Cho Nam (HKU), Dr Paul Shin (City U), Mr Samson So (Eco Institute), Prof. Nora Tam (City U), Mr Tam Po Yiu, Dr Jackie Yip (AFCD) (b) Outside the Steering Committee/Working Groups - Mr John Allcock (WWF-HK), Ms Aidia Chan (AFCD), Mr Christophe Barthelemy, Mr Geoff Carey (AEC), Dr John Fellowes (KFBG), Dr Stephan Gale (KFBG), Dr David Gallacher (AECOM), Dr Leszek Karczmarski (HKU), Dr Pankaj Kumar (KFBG), Mr Paul Leader (AEC), Ms Janet Lee (AFCD), Dr Michael Leven (AEC), Ms Angie Ng (CA), Dr Ng Sai-chit (AFCD), Mr Tony Nip (KFBG), Mr Stan Shea, Ms Shadow Sin (OPCF), Ms Ivy So (AFCD), Mr Ray So, Dr Sung Yik Hei (KFBG), Dr Alvin Tang (Muni Arborist Ltd), Dr Allen To (WWF-HK), Mr Yu Yat Tung (HKBWS) 4. -
Agrion 19(1) - January 2015 AGRION NEWSLETTER of the WORLDWIDE DRAGONFLY ASSOCIATION
Agrion 19(1) - January 2015 AGRION NEWSLETTER OF THE WORLDWIDE DRAGONFLY ASSOCIATION PATRON: Professor Edward O. Wilson FRS, FRSE Volume 19, Number 1 January 2015 Secretary: Dr. Jessica I. Ware, Assistant Professor, Department of Biological Sciences, 206 Boyden Hall, Rutgers University, 195 University Avenue, Newark, NJ 07102, USA. Email: [email protected]. Editors: Keith D.P. Wilson. 18 Chatsworth Road, Brighton, BN1 5DB, UK. Email: [email protected]. Graham T. Reels. 31 St Anne’s Close, Badger Farm, Winchester, SO22 4LQ, Hants, UK. Email: [email protected]. ISSN 1476-2552 Agrion 19(1) - January 2015 AGRION NEWSLETTER OF THE WORLDWIDE DRAGONFLY ASSOCIATION AGRION is the Worldwide Dragonfly Association’s (WDA’s) newsletter, published twice a year, in January and July. The WDA aims to advance public education and awareness by the promotion of the study and conservation of dragonflies (Odonata) and their natural habitats in all parts of the world. AGRION covers all aspects of WDA’s activities; it communicates facts and knowledge related to the study and conservation of dragonflies and is a forum for news and information exchange for members. AGRION is freely available for downloading from the WDA website at http://worlddragonfly.org/?page_id=125. WDA is a Registered Charity (Not-for-Profit Organization), Charity No. 1066039/0. ________________________________________________________________________________ Editor’s notes Keith Wilson [[email protected]] Conference News The 2015 International Congress of Odonatology will be held at La Plata City, 60 km south of Buenos Aires, Argentina in association with the Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Museo de La Plata and Instituto de Limnología.