DOCSLIB.ORG

Manganese Deposits of Western Utah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Manganese Deposits of Western Utah Manganese Deposits of Western Utah GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 979-A Manganese Deposits of Western Utah By MAX D. CRITTENDEN, JR. , MANGANESE DEPOSITS OF UTAH, PART 1 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 979-A A report on known deposits west of the lllth meridian * UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 19S1 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 50 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Fag* Abstract.__________________________________________________________ 1 Introduction._._____.__________----_______-______-_--_------.__-__ 1 History of mining and production__.._______.______.___.__-___-_____ 2 Occurrence and age of the deposits_________-_____-_.-__-__-_-__--_- 6 Mineralogy _--____._____---_--_---_------------------------------- 7 Descriptions of the manganese minerals....____.__--_____-__-..__ 8 Oxides...___-__.--_--------___-_-_.-- . _ 8 Carbonates.___-____.__-____________-_-___-----_--------__ 9 Silicate.,_ _____-----_____--__-_______-_---___-__--___._--. 9 Relative stability and manganese content______--_----------_----_ 10 Oxidation and enrichment._____________________________________ 10 Classification and origin of the deposits....______.__._____---.___.-_-_ 11 General discussion_____________________________________________ 11 Syngenetic deposits_-_--____-----_--------------_-------__-_-.- 13 Bedded depositS-__________-_____._____..__________________ 13 Spring deposits....----_-------_------------_------_------_ 14 Epigenetic deposits________________.._______.____.____.____.---_ 15 Oxidized hydrothermal deposits-_-_-_-________-_.______.____ 15 Deposits of oxides of undetermined origin... .____-________--__ 16 Reserves and future outlook._______________________________________ 16 Descriptions of individual deposits...________________________________ 18 Beaver County______________________________________________ 19 Susie Q claims..________--_-___-___-_____--_--_--_-------_ 19 Black Rock (Shotwell) deposit.._._......_.._....._._._._._.. 20 Black Jack (Skougard) claims....___________________________ 20 Steelville prospect,._______________________________________ 21 Spor property.____________________________________________ 21 Big Maple area__________________________________________ 21 Cache County_______________________________________________ 21 Blacksmith Fork area._____________________________________ 21 Garfield County..______________________________________ 22 Fullmer prospect___________-______________________________ 22 Hawkins claims_--_--__---_-____-__--___---_--_-_---_-___- 22 Unnamed prospect_________________________________________ 22 Iron County__________________________________________________ 23 Black Jack (Gregory) claims__-_____________________________ 23 Clove prospect__-_______-______--__--__-_____-__--___-_--_ 23 Blackhawk and Joe Louis claims. __:.___--____-____-_________ 24 Lucky Joe claim__-___._____________-_.____-__-_---___-_- 24 Taylor prospect.----_-__--_______________.__-___--__-____- 24 Modena locality.:_________________________________________ 24 Unnamed prospect________ ______.________._.___.._._.____ 24 in IV CONTENTS Descriptions of individual deposits Continued Page Juab County._______________,.___-__-_____-____--___-_-___-____ 24 Abraham Hot Spring deposit______________________________ 24 Blackjack (Neilson) claims_______._--_____-----_--__---__ 25 Black Jack (Kendall-Duvall) claims________--____---________ 26 Orme property___-_-____-_________________--_____-________ 26 Black Ledge claims-___-_____-_-_____--___-_--___-__-__-l__ 27 Topaz Mountain locality__-___________-___-____---_________ 27 ' Juab and Millard Counties___-__-__-___--_-_____--____-_____-__ 27 Detroit district____-_____-___________--___-----_-_-________ 27 Staats and Pratt mines (Black Boy group)_-____--_-_____. 28 Guy group (Black Jack mine)_____-_-___-,-_-___-____-._ 30 Last Chance property..__-_____-____-_______---___-___. 30 Black Diamond mine. _________________-_^-_-_--_---.__ 31 Martha prospect___-____--_____--____------_-__-_____ 31 Black Hawk claim__________ _______________________ gj Verdun claim..._ ..........\.._.___._. ____________ 31 Manganese King and Manganese King No. 1 claims.______ 31 Piute County_________________________________________________ 31 Blue Miami Moon No. 1 claim_.____________________.___ ____ 31 Blackbird claims____-__--____--______________-___..--_--___ 32 Dry Canyon claims._______________________________________ 32 Gilbert claims..__-_-___-__-___-____--_____--____--________ 33 Rich County________________________________________________ 33 Lakeview claims_________________________________________ 33 Salt Lake County______.______._______________________________ 34 Manganese Lode property_________________--__------------- 34 Evans lime quarry...______________----_------------------- 34 Michigan-Utah property.--.------------.------------------- 35 Sanpete County___________---------.--------------------------- 35 Unnamed prospect ----------_.__________________________ 35 Sevier County...___-______________--_------------------------- 36 Yellow Hornet property._-__----____---------_____________. 36 Noonday prospect.______-_______________.__-______-_---__- 36 Jumbo prospect-.-.---.----------------------------------- 36 Georgia mine.._________________ ____________________------ 36 Summit County..._-.----------------------------------------- 36 Unnamed prospect----------.___________________.__________ 36 Park City district..----........--------------------------- 37 Ontario rnine_ --_---_____.___-_-___-_--__-_-_._______ 37 Silver King property---------------------------------- ^ Tooele County------------------------------------------------ 37 Ophir district- -------._..___________._____-_-.___________- 37 Ophir Hill mine-..---.-.------------------------------ 37 Columbia district________._------------------------------ ^? Benmore mme_____------------------------------------ Shar mine.---------_-__.._.___.__________________--- 38 CONTENTS V Descriptions of individual deposits Continued P»g« Tooele and Juab Counties___----_-_-_-------------------------- 39 Erickson district.__________________________-_-_---_-_---_ 39 Black Rock claims_______-_-_______-___----__-------- 40 Bla,ck Jack (Morgan-Cromar) claims_____________________ 41 Deer Trail claims____-_-__-_--_____-_-___-_-___-_-____- 43 Indian Boy claim___.__________________________________ 43 Utonia claim__________________________________-_-__--_ 44 May Farmer claims__-_-_-_________--________---_--__ 44 Queen Mary claims.__-__--__.___..__________-_-_-_---- 44 Utah County______.._.______.._.___________.-_-.---_ 44 Wildcat mine------_-----------------_---------_---------- 44 Trotter mine__-___..______--__-_--_--_---_-_-_-- _ 46 Spalding claims__-____--_--____-_________-_-_-_-_-_------ 47 Queen of the West claim__________________________________ 48 Silver Hill property_--__--_-_---_-_--_____----_---_-_---_-- 48 Utah and Juab Counties_____________________________________ 48 Tintic district__________________-_______-._.__ 48 . Tip Top tunnel __--------__-__-_-___-_-_-----_ ---_ 49 Oxen mine__________-_---___________-__--_-_-___------ 50 Tintic Standard mine_________________________--_-_--__ 51 Fields claims______-------__--_______-_-___-_-_-_---- 52 Black Jack (Empire) mine___________________________ 52 White Cloud claim.____________________._._ 53 Black Jack (Winberg) property_____________-___- _-- 54 Iron Blossom mine___________________________________ 54 Iron King mine______________________________________ 54 Apex Standard claims--____-____________-____-_-_-_--_- 55 North Tintic claims__________________________________ 55 Wasatch County.__________--___-___-______-______-_-_-.___--_ 55 Grey Hawk property___-_______--_____________.-_-_------ 55 East Star No. 1 property----__--_-_-_-___-_-------_-------- 55 Washington County_______-____-________-.__-_____-_------_- 56 Black Beauty No. 1 claim._________________________________ 56 Wallace claims.___________________________________________ 57 Weber County________________.______________________.__ 57 Payday claims.________________________ _____-___-_--_--_-_ 57 Selected bibliography.__________l______________.____________--_--__ 59 Index ____________________________________________________________ 61 ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE 1. Map showing distribution of manganese deposits in western Utah. _________________________________________ In pocket FIGURE 1. Chart showing production of manganese ore in Utah, 1900- 1945________________________________ 6 2. Chart showing discoveries and price of manganese ore in western Utah, 1914-42____________ ________ .. 18 VI CONTENTS TABLES Page TABLE 1. Manganese-ore production in western Utah by grade, 1915-45. 3 2. Manganese-ore production in western Utah by year, 1915-45 __ ' 3 3. Shipments of manganese ore and manganiferous ore from western Utah, 1915-45__-_-_-___--_-__----__________ 4. Estimated reserves of manganese ore in western Utah_____.___ 5. Range in composition of samples of water from Abraham Hot Spring, Juab County, Utah_______________________________ 25 6. Assay of metallurgical sample from Black Jack (Kendall- Duvall) claims, Juab County..._____________---___--____ 26 7. Manganese-ore production, Staats and Pratt mines, Detroit district, Juab and Millard Counties.________--_-____.____ 29 8. Manganese-ore production, Guy group (Black Jack mine), Detroit district._______________________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geology and Mineral Deposits of the James River-Roanoke River Manganese District Virginia
    Geology and Mineral Deposits of the James River-Roanoke River Manganese District Virginia GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1008 Geology and Mineral ·Deposits oftheJatnes River-Roanoke River Manganese District Virginia By GILBERT H. ESPENSHADE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1008 A description of the geology anq mineral deposits, particularly manganese, of the James River-Roanoke River district UNITED STAT.ES GOVERNMENT, PRINTING. OFFICE• WASHINGTON : 1954 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS· Page Abstract---------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction______________________________________________________ 4 Location, accessibility, and culture_______________________________ 4 Topography, climate, and vegetation _______________ .,.. _______ ---___ 6 Field work and acknowledgments________________________________ 6 Previouswork_________________________________________________ 8 GeneralgeologY--------------------------------------------------- 9 Principal features ____________________________ -- __________ ---___ 9 Metamorphic rocks____________________________________________ 11 Generalstatement_________________________________________ 11 Lynchburg gneiss and associated igneous rocks________________ 12 Evington groUP------------------------------------------- 14 Candler formation_____________________________________ 14 Archer Creek formation________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Mineralogical Study of the La Hueca Cretaceous Iron-Manganese
    Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas ISSN: 1026-8774 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Corona Esquivel, Rodolfo; Ortega Gutiérrez, Fernando; Reyes Salas, Margarita; Lozano Santacruz, Rufino; Miranda Gasca, Miguel Angel Mineralogical study of the La Hueca Cretaceous Iron-Manganese deposit, Michoacán, south-western Mexico Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, vol. 17, núm. 2, 2000, pp. 142-151 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Querétaro, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57217206 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, volumen 17, número 2, 143 2000, p. 143- 153 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología, México, D.F MINERALOGICAL STUDY OF THE LA HUECA CRETACEOUS IRON- MANGANESE DEPOSIT, MICHOACÁN, SOUTHWESTERN MEXICO Rodolfo Corona-Esquivel1, Fernando Ortega-Gutiérrez1, Margarita Reyes-Salas1, Rufino Lozano-Santacruz1, and Miguel Angel Miranda-Gasca2 ABSTRACT In this work we describe for the first time the mineralogy and very briefly the possible origin of a banded Fe-Mn deposit associated with a Cretaceous volcanosedimentary sequence of the southern Guerrero terrane, near the sulfide massive volcanogenic deposit of La Minita. The deposit is confined within a felsic tuff unit; about 10 meters thick where sampled for chemical analysis. Using XRF, EDS and XRD techniques, we found besides todorokite, cryptomelane, quartz, romanechite (psilomelane), birnessite, illite-muscovite, cristobalite, chlorite, barite, halloysite, woodruffite, nacrite or kaolinite, and possibly hollandite-ferrian, as well as an amorphous material and two unknown manganese phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Metamorphism of Sedimentary Manganese Deposits
    Acta Mineralogica-Petrographica, Szeged, XX/2, 325—336, 1972. METAMORPHISM OF SEDIMENTARY MANGANESE DEPOSITS SUPRIYA ROY ABSTRACT: Metamorphosed sedimentary deposits of manganese occur extensively in India, Brazil, U. S. A., Australia, New Zealand, U. S. S. R., West and South West Africa, Madagascar and Japan. Different mineral-assemblages have been recorded from these deposits which may be classi- fied into oxide, carbonate, silicate and silicate-carbonate formations. The oxide formations are represented by lower oxides (braunite, bixbyite, hollandite, hausmannite, jacobsite, vredenburgite •etc.), the carbonate formations by rhodochrosite, kutnahorite, manganoan calcite etc., the silicate formations by spessartite, rhodonite, manganiferous amphiboles and pyroxenes, manganophyllite, piedmontite etc. and the silicate-carbonate formations by rhodochrosite, rhodonite, tephroite, spessartite etc. Pétrographie and phase-equilibia data indicate that the original bulk composition in the sediments, the reactions during metamorphism (contact and regional and the variations and effect of 02, C02, etc. with rise of temperature, control the mineralogy of the metamorphosed manga- nese formations. The general trend of formation and transformation of mineral phases in oxide, carbonate, silicate and silicate-carbonate formations during regional and contact metamorphism has, thus, been established. Sedimentary manganese formations, later modified by regional or contact metamorphism, have been reported from different parts of the world. The most important among such deposits occur in India, Brazil, U.S.A., U.S.S.R., Ghana, South and South West Africa, Madagascar, Australia, New Zealand, Great Britain, Japan etc. An attempt will be made to summarize the pertinent data on these metamorphosed sedimentary formations so as to establish the role of original bulk composition of the sediments, transformation and reaction of phases at ele- vated temperature and varying oxygen and carbon dioxide fugacities in determin- ing the mineral assemblages in these deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Waste Associated with Closed Mines in England and Wales
    The nature of waste associated with closed mines in England and Wales Minerals & Waste Programme Open Report OR/10/14 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERALS & WASTE PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/10/14 The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the The nature of waste associated Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. OS Topography © Crown with closed mines in England and Copyright. All rights reserved. BGS 100017897/2010 Wales Keywords Abandoned mine waste facilities; Palumbo-Roe, B and Colman, T England and Wales; mineral deposits; environmental impact; Contributor/editor European Mine Waste Directive. Cameron, D G, Linley, K and Gunn, A G Front cover Graiggoch Mine (SN 7040 7410), Ceredigion, Wales. Bibliographical reference Palumbo-Roe, B and Colman, T with contributions from Cameron, D G, Linley, K and Gunn, A G. 2010. The nature of waste associated with closed mines in England and Wales. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/10/14. 98pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Environment Agency that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. The views and statements expressed in this report are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent the views of the Environment Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Characterization of Groundwater Resources in Rush Valley, Tooele County, Utah
    Prepared in cooperation with the State of Utah Department of Natural Resources Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Characterization of Groundwater Resources in Rush Valley, Tooele County, Utah Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5068 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Groundwater-supplied stock tank in southwestern Rush Valley, Utah. Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Characterization of Groundwater Resources in Rush Valley, Tooele County, Utah By Philip M. Gardner and Stefan Kirby Prepared in cooperation with the State of Utah Department of Natural Resources Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5068 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Gardner, P.M., and Kirby, S.M., 2011, Hydrogeologic and geochemical characterization of groundwater resources in Rush Valley, Tooele County, Utah: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Minerals Checklist
    Division of Geology and Earth Resources MS 47007; Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Washington State 360-902-1450; 360-902-1785 fax E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/geology Minerals Checklist Note: Mineral names in parentheses are the preferred species names. Compiled by Raymond Lasmanis o Acanthite o Arsenopalladinite o Bustamite o Clinohumite o Enstatite o Harmotome o Actinolite o Arsenopyrite o Bytownite o Clinoptilolite o Epidesmine (Stilbite) o Hastingsite o Adularia o Arsenosulvanite (Plagioclase) o Clinozoisite o Epidote o Hausmannite (Orthoclase) o Arsenpolybasite o Cairngorm (Quartz) o Cobaltite o Epistilbite o Hedenbergite o Aegirine o Astrophyllite o Calamine o Cochromite o Epsomite o Hedleyite o Aenigmatite o Atacamite (Hemimorphite) o Coffinite o Erionite o Hematite o Aeschynite o Atokite o Calaverite o Columbite o Erythrite o Hemimorphite o Agardite-Y o Augite o Calciohilairite (Ferrocolumbite) o Euchroite o Hercynite o Agate (Quartz) o Aurostibite o Calcite, see also o Conichalcite o Euxenite o Hessite o Aguilarite o Austinite Manganocalcite o Connellite o Euxenite-Y o Heulandite o Aktashite o Onyx o Copiapite o o Autunite o Fairchildite Hexahydrite o Alabandite o Caledonite o Copper o o Awaruite o Famatinite Hibschite o Albite o Cancrinite o Copper-zinc o o Axinite group o Fayalite Hillebrandite o Algodonite o Carnelian (Quartz) o Coquandite o o Azurite o Feldspar group Hisingerite o Allanite o Cassiterite o Cordierite o o Barite o Ferberite Hongshiite o Allanite-Ce o Catapleiite o Corrensite o o Bastnäsite
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Processing
    Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Volume & Fieldtrip Guidebook
    SGA Student Conference Mineral resources for the society Prague, April 15‐19, 2011 Society for Geology Applied to Mineral Deposits & Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic SGA Student Conference Mineral resources for the society Prague, April 15‐19, 2011 ABSTRACT VOLUME & FIELD TRIP GUIDEBOOK Editor Kateřina Schlöglová 1 SGA Student Conference Mineral resources for the society Prague, April 15‐19, 2011 Contents Program of the conference 4 Abstract Volume Hydrotermal Alteration and Mass Change Calculations at the Mastra Au‐Ag Deposit, 8 Gümüşhane, Turkey Neslihan ASLAN & Miğraç AKÇAY Qualitative and quantitative analysis of talc from Western Carpathians 9 Vladimír ČAVAJDA, Peter UHLÍK & Ľubica PUŠKELOVÁ The Kombat Deposit in Namibia: A possible IOCG deposit 10 Nikola DENISOVÁ Geology and mineralization of the polymetallic Salt River deposit near Pofadder, 11 Namaqualand metamorphic province, South Africa Thomas DITTRICH, Bernhard SCHULZ, Jens GUTZMER, Keith OSBURN & Craig R. McCLUNG Application and significance of Vickers Microhardness Measurments for coal 12 Anne ENGLER Reactive fluid flow and origin of the fracture‐controlled greisens in the Krušné hory Mts., 13 Czech Republic Matylda HEŘMANSKÁ & David DOLEJŠ Low‐temperature alteration of metamict Y, REE, Nb, Ta, Ti oxide minerals 14 Nikola HEROLDOVÁ & Radek ŠKODA Grade and tonnage model for orogenic gold deposits in Finland and comparison with 15 Swedish, Zimbabwean, and Australian Southern Cross deposits Janne HOKKA Alteration styles and geochemical zonation at the Raitevarri
    [Show full text]
  • Investigations of Mixed-Anion Analogs of Manganite Perovskites and Bimetallic
    Investigations of Mixed-Anion Analogs of Manganite Perovskites and Bimetallic Group II Nitride Fluorides By Oscar Kipruto Keino Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science in the Chemistry Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY December, 2017 Investigations of Mixed-Anion Analogs of Manganite Perovskites and Bimetallic Group II Nitride Fluorides By Oscar Kipruto Keino I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the Ohio LINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: ________________________________________________________________ Oscar Kipruto Keino, Student Date Approvals: ________________________________________________________________ Dr. Timothy R. Wagner, Thesis Advisor Date ________________________________________________________________ Dr. Sherri Lovelace-Cameron, Committee Member Date ________________________________________________________________ Dr. Allen Hunter, Committee Member Date ________________________________________________________________ Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Date Dean, College of Graduate Studies iii ABSTRACT Lanthanum manganites are perovskite related materials known in particular for their colossal magnetoresistance (CM) properties. Manganite compositions showing CM behavior are mixed cation compounds such as (CaxLa1-x) MnO3, which contain Mn ions in mixed
    [Show full text]
  • Mineralogy and Metallogenesis of the Sanbao Mn–Ag (Zn-Pb) Deposit in the Laojunshan Ore District, SE Yunnan Province, China
    minerals Article Mineralogy and Metallogenesis of the Sanbao Mn–Ag (Zn-Pb) Deposit in the Laojunshan Ore District, SE Yunnan Province, China Shengjiang Du 1,2, Hanjie Wen 3,4,*, Shirong Liu 3, Chaojian Qin 3, Yongfeng Yan 5, Guangshu Yang 5 and Pengyu Feng 5 1 State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Resources and Environment, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China; [email protected] 2 Chinese Academy of Geological Science, Beijing 100037, China 3 State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China; [email protected] (S.L.); [email protected] (C.Q.) 4 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 5 Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China; [email protected] (Y.Y.); [email protected] (G.Y.); [email protected] (P.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26 June 2020; Accepted: 17 July 2020; Published: 23 July 2020 Abstract: The Sanbao Mn–Ag (Zn-Pb) deposit located in the Laojunshan ore district is one of the most important deposits that has produced most Ag and Mn metals in southeastern Yunnan Province, China. Few studies are available concerning the distribution and mineralization of Ag, restricting further resource exploration. In this study, detailed mineralogy, chronology, and geochemistry are examined with the aim of revealing Ag occurrence and its associated primary base-metal and supergene mineralization. Results show that manganite and romanèchite are the major Ag-bearing minerals. Cassiterite from the Mn–Ag ores yielded a U–Pb age of 436 17 Ma, consistent with ± the Caledonian age of the Nanwenhe granitic pluton.
    [Show full text]
  • Compositional Characteristics of Kinoshitatite from the Sausar Group
    American Mineralogist, Volume 74, pages 200-202, 1989 Compositionalcharacteristics of kinoshitatite from the SausarGroup, India SoNrN,q.rHD,c.scuprA., Slun Crr,cxRAnonrr, Puul.r SnNcurra, P. K. BnarrAcHARyA! H. BlNrn"rnn Centre of Advanced Study in Economic Geology, Department of Geological Sciences,Jadavpur University, Calcutta-700 032, India M. Furuoxe Department of Geology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan Anstnlcr Ba-rich and Ba-poor micas with varying Mn and Mg content in octahedralsites coexist in isolated pockets in braunite-bixbyite-hausmanniteores that have been invaded by late silicic pegmatite and carbonateveins in the SausarGroup, India. The micas are secondary in nature and are pseudomorphsafter carbonatesand alkali feldspars.One of the micas approachesclosely synthetic end-memberkinoshitalite, BaMgrAlrSirO,o(OH)..The present study shows a complete solid solution between the K (phlogopite) and Ba (kinoshitalite) end-members.Compositional diversities in these micas are attributable to the different minerals that the micas replaced. INlnolucrroN lites. Micas havedeveloped in manganeseoxide-rich rocks Krnoshitalite, BaMg.AlrSirOr0(OH)r, was defined by wherethe latter have beeninvaded by late silicic pegmatite Yoshii et al. (1973a)as the Ba and Mg trioctahedralbrit- and carbonateveins. In thesepockets, the manganeseox- tle mica. As an end-member, it is known only as a syn- ide-rich rocks exhibit the following mineral assemblage: thetic phase obtained hydrothermally at 600 "C and 2 braunite * hausmannite + bixbyite * Ba-bearingmica kbar (Frondel and Ito, 1967). Naturally occurring ki- + alkali feldspar + hematite * calcite + dolomite + noshitalite has been reported with considerableamounts qtrartz. The oxides collectively account for over 800/oof of K and Mn (Yoshii et al., l9l3b; Yoshii and Maeda, the rock.
    [Show full text]
  • 2713^7 Contents
    MINERALS OF WASHINGTON, D.C. AND VICINITY by Lawrence R. Bernstein U. S. Geo^r^'ce.l Survey OPEN F-'::. r;.".r'0.?;r cer.-..: 2713^7 CONTENTS Introduction 1 Scope of report 4 Mineral collecting 5 Acknowledgments 6 Introduction 6a ITT3 Aclj.il1 -> ! T^______.___~^. -"» _«_____«..«_»«__.. " " .._.«__._.._*_.__._.,_.._.-. _>-.-- -_>-->.-..-. Q Triassic deposits 31 Mineral localities 38 District of Columbia : 38 IMavtrlWlCfci JT XClilUl a Tirl ~ __ ___« - - -_ -»-i-___ .__- _ __- - ________________ m~m~m~ m~ m~ «M » M* **A^J ^ Anne Arundel County 43 Baltimore County 45 Howard County - 74 Montgomery County 88 Prince Georges County 120 Virginia . 129 Arlington County 129 Fairfax County 131 Fauquier County 139 Loudoun County 143 Prince William County 149 Diabase quarries of northern Virginia 155 CAPTIONS Illustrations Plate 1. Mineral localities of Washington, B.C., and vicinity. Plate 2. Generalized geologic map of Washington. D.C. and vicinity, Plate 3. Mineral deposits and generalized geology of the Triassic rocks near Washington, D.C. List of Figures Figure 1. Index map showing region covered in this report. Stfaded area is covered in most detail. Figure 2. Block diagram of the Washington, D.C. region showing physiographic provinces and major geographic and geologic features. ITfgure -3. Coastal Plain deposits of Washington, D.C. and vicinity. Figure 4. Generalized cross section of a typical complex pegmatite of the Washington, D.C. area. Figure 5. Rhythmically.layered gabbro of the Baltimore Gabbro Com­ plex at Ilchester, Maryland. Figure 6. Triassic diabase dike forming a ridge north of Route 7 near Dranesville, Virginia.
    [Show full text]