Bangor University DOCTOR of PHILOSOPHY A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bangor University DOCTOR of PHILOSOPHY A Bangor University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY A comparative study of the High Church party in the dioceses of Chester and Bangor between 1688 and 1715. Wood, Craig David Award date: 2002 Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 A Comparative Study of the High Church Party in the Dioceses of Chester and Bangor between 1688 and 1715 Craig David Wood i U.wem. v' ,,,. r>> . ýýYý_, 'd *************** ********************************************* ****** The following material has been excluded from the digitised copy due to 3`d Party Copyright restrictions: NONE Readers may consult the original thesis if they wish to see this material ***************** **************************ý********************* A Comparative Study of the High Church Party in the Dioceses of Chester and Bangor between 1688 and 1715 A Definition of High Churchmanship According to Diocesan Consensus Modern scholarship defines High Churchmanship as a distinct and partisan branch of the Anglican Church in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, especially in the context of religious intrigues in the houses of civil and church government in London. Throughout the period between the Revolution of 1688 and the accession of the House of Hanover in 1715, the High Church party are commonly associated with the political Tories and are deemed as those who supported the exiled Stuart dynasty and engaged in intrigues toward deposing King William III, undermining Queen Anne and opposing the succession of King George I. In a religious context the High Church party are accepted as having been actively engaged in opposing religious Dissent, and in seeking to secure legislative censure against the Dissenters. They are perceived as a branch of the Church who sought to preserve some elements of Roman Catholic tradition within the Church of England, and actions such as bowing toward the altar and kneeling at receipt of Communion are espoused as indicative of High Church affiliation, as is the arrangement of church furniture, and particularly the positioning of the Communion Table. By considering two specific dioceses, Bangor and Chester, both of which are a sufficient distance from London not to be shaped instantly or directly by events in Convocation or Parliament, this study will examine what High Churchmanship meant to the clerics, prelates and laity of two very different dioceses at the end of the seventeenth and beginning of the eighteenth centuries. In doing so, it will also seek to establish how High Churchmanship survived as a distinct standpoint in the period between 1688 and 1715 as other religious viewpoints, such as Jacobitism and the Nonjuring stance, overlapped the High Church position, and the will assess extent to which this stance was an organised, partisan one. V List of Tables List of Appendices vi Preface vii Acknowledgements viii 1 Defining High Churchmanship 1 The Appeal to History 4 9 The High Churchmen of the Seventeenth Century The High Church Group 13 2 The Nonjuror Schism 17 The Deposition of James II and the accession 18 of William and Mary 24 Schism among the High Churchmen The Nonjuror Wilderness 29 3 The High Church Party after the Schism 33 Britain Under William and Mary 34 Comprehension and Toleration 38 The Convocation Controversies 43 King William and the Commission for Preferments 48 4 The Reign of Queen Anne 54 The Accession and Succession of Queen Anne 55 The Convocation Disputes under Queen Anne 60 The Church of England under Queen Anne 63 5 Evidence for a High Church Consensus in the dioceses of Bangor and Chester 74 Doctrinally Reconciling the Revolution 76 The Effect of Division on Practice 89 The Effect of Division on Doctrine 94 The Practical Expression of Division 99 6 Clerical Responses to Divisions and Political Developments in the dioceses of Bangor and Chester 105 The New Enemy of the Noniurors and the Old Enemy of Popery 106 High Church Reactions to Toleration of Dissenters 115 Clerical Reaction to Henry Sacheverell, the Succession of King George I and the riots of 1715 122 7 Lay Evidence of the Existance of a High Church Consensus within the dioceses of Bangor and Chester 137 Lay Tory, Noncon formist and Jacobite Affinities 138 Lay involvement in the Riots of 1715 159 Lay Affiliation to the High Church Standpoint 162 8 Redefining High Churchmanship 170 Appendix A ix List of References xv Bibliography Map 1x Towns mentioned in a National Context Map 2 xi Towns mentioned in Wales Map 3 xii Towns mentioned in England ! 'aP 4 xiii Areas mentioned around Preston Maps drawn by Philip Horrocks. ýý a vo 0 :t ý ý, SS(ý j"111.E6 .. wNDDyFNAI MEWAI B&AVMARIG "BANGOP 1 OLEN *CAERNWON"LLMDDCJN, )MACHWO .P LLANFyL1-I 1, J C MAPa 1Uii -s k23 0 3 P1it- ES ri MAP-6 k i« i e 3 pf lti- Effa OIJALLfy ,2fß o CLAL -/DoP, ' ALTI+A' PREST©,J 0 KuL PCIVORN 0 ýTANß15H " WICAN MAP 4- Appendix 1 ix List of the Bishops of Bangor and Chester Dioceses 1688-1715 In seeking to reach a definition of High Churchmanship contemporary to the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, this study will begin by considering the background of the High Church standpoint, with reference to the history of the Church of England from the Reformation. It will then outline the tumultuous nature of the reign of King James II and examine the reasons for his downfall, and continue to consider the responses of Anglican clerics in a national and diocesan context, with the use of both primary and secondary material. This will involve consideration of issues like the settlement of the succession in the House of Hanover, the preservation of the Church and its offices, and support of both the Revolution and the Stuart cause. Focusing on religious, temporal and lay reaction alike, the latter half of the study will then consider primary evidence gathered from original research to determine the extent to which High Churchmanship, as manifest in the dioceses Bangor Chester, of and was similar in its emphases to the and priorities national picture depicted by events in London. In so doing it will seek to redefine the term "High Churchmanship", and consider the validity of applying national evidence to a parochial society. Every thesis must begin with a lengthy list of people to whom an enormous debt of gratitude is owed, and this one is no exception. On an academic level, my thanks are owed to all the staff at the School of Theology and Religious Studies at the University Of Wales, Bangor, including Dr Densil Morgan for guidance in the early stages of the thesis, and more especially to my supervisor, Dr Geraint Tudur, for his continued advice and support. Dr Tony Claydon of the School of History and Welsh History also deserves recognition for his early assistance. The staff of all the libraries and depositories that I visited are also due my sincere thanks. Those at; the Archive Department of Central Library, Manchester, Chethams Library, Manchester, and especially Barbara and Tony Meehan for making my introduction to the library so easy, John Rylands Library, Manchester, the Lancashire County Records Office, Preston, Lambeth Palace Library, London, the National Library of Wales, Aberystwyth, the Local History Library, Salford and the Archives and Manuscripts Department at the University of Wales, Bangor. Also those libraries who replied to my initial enquiries with such speed and courtesy, including the Archive Library, Canterbury and Gwynedd County Records Office, Caernarfon. Personally I owe a massive debt to numerous friends for their patience, tolerance and feigned interest, especially Phil Horrocks, Ian Simmonds, Emma Moore, Justin Barrass and Sarah Kelly. Special mention ought to be made of Niamh O'Neill, Lisa Major, Emma Garner and Ian Robinson for their assisting me in surviving London, and Bob Gillatt for his endless supplies of letters which helped combat loneliness in Aberystwyth. Mavis and Owen Von Blydenstein and all the friends I made through them in Bangor, also deserve my special thanks for ensuring that I devoted suitable time to play, as well as to work. Special mention must also be made of the people who have bravely borne the spectre of sharing a house with a PhD student; Graeme Edwards, Rob Jones, James Garside, Thomas and Taka, Dorothy Harkin and all of the San Marino Community who made me feel so welcome in London, and last but by no means least Carys Alwen Jones, Angharad Hughes, Jon Hughes and Clifford Tonios. As always though, my greatest debt of gratitude is to my parents, Chris and Dave, and my brother Mark, without whose continued support, love and humour this thesis would never have seen the light of day. All of those mentioned here have been more of a support than they can ever know. Defining High Churchnanship. The High Church party of the period 1688 to 1715 was a discordant body whose coherence varied according to the behaviour, systems of beliefs, doctrinal allegiances and political affiliations of its individual adherents.
Recommended publications
  • THE NON-JURORS, 1688-1805 by ALBERT MITCHELL
    THE NON-JURORS, I688-x805 205 THE NON-JURORS, 1688-1805 By ALBERT MITCHELL. On the 7th February, 1688-9, the Convention Parliament recognized William and Mary as Sovereigns of England, in the place of James II, who, having left the realm on the previous 23rd December, had been declared by the Convention Parliament to be deemed to have abdicated the throne. While there was widespread feeling that government by King James had become impossible, there had been no complete agreement as to the course to be followed : the desires of many went no further than a Regency by William, preserving the title of James: but the more influential majority felt that such a middle course would but defer the trouble : and called for a change in the settlement of the Crown. A very simple new oath of allegiance was required in place of the older form : but nevertheless a distinct issue arose in the Church of England. There were those who felt, or expressed, no difficulty in giving a new allegiance to the new Sovereigns de facto, accepting the legal fiction that the desertion of the realm by the king de jure had vacated the throne. But a minority regarded the oath of allegiance already given, in more stringent terms, to James as of a personal nature that could be determined only by his death. The Archbishop of York and nine other bishops took the former course. The Archbishop of Canterbury and eight other bishops took the latter course. Of these, three died before the time limited by Act of Parlia­ ment expired : but the senior primate and five bishops were by the Act first suspended and then deprived.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annals of the Four Masters De Búrca Rare Books Download
    De Búrca Rare Books A selection of fine, rare and important books and manuscripts Catalogue 142 Summer 2020 DE BÚRCA RARE BOOKS Cloonagashel, 27 Priory Drive, Blackrock, County Dublin. 01 288 2159 01 288 6960 CATALOGUE 142 Summer 2020 PLEASE NOTE 1. Please order by item number: Four Masters is the code word for this catalogue which means: “Please forward from Catalogue 142: item/s ...”. 2. Payment strictly on receipt of books. 3. You may return any item found unsatisfactory, within seven days. 4. All items are in good condition, octavo, and cloth bound, unless otherwise stated. 5. Prices are net and in Euro. Other currencies are accepted. 6. Postage, insurance and packaging are extra. 7. All enquiries/orders will be answered. 8. We are open to visitors, preferably by appointment. 9. Our hours of business are: Mon. to Fri. 9 a.m.-5.30 p.m., Sat. 10 a.m.- 1 p.m. 10. As we are Specialists in Fine Books, Manuscripts and Maps relating to Ireland, we are always interested in acquiring same, and pay the best prices. 11. We accept: Visa and Mastercard. There is an administration charge of 2.5% on all credit cards. 12. All books etc. remain our property until paid for. 13. Text and images copyright © De Burca Rare Books. 14. All correspondence to 27 Priory Drive, Blackrock, County Dublin. Telephone (01) 288 2159. International + 353 1 288 2159 (01) 288 6960. International + 353 1 288 6960 Fax (01) 283 4080. International + 353 1 283 4080 e-mail [email protected] web site www.deburcararebooks.com COVER ILLUSTRATIONS: Our cover illustration is taken from item 70, Owen Connellan’s translation of The Annals of the Four Masters.
    [Show full text]
  • * Earlier Life-Truth'- Exponents
    2 tm r « / ■ *. ^ . • •••■ i * * EARLIER LIFE-TRUTH'- % * : . # EXPONENTS ■ r» V ■ • I" * a : Tv • ? ■ 33T Church of God General Conference: McDonough, GA, https://coggc.org/ A. J. MILLS. • • r. * WITH FOREWORD BY ROBERT K. STRANG, m % Editor of Words of Life. a % • price 15 Cents. .* ■ * •- • : NATIONAL BIBLE INSTITUTION OREGON, ILLINOIS. ■*% *#.. V •« CANADA: R. H. JUDD, GRAFTON, ONTARIO. I' LONDON: * ELLIOT STOCK, 7, PATERNOSTER ROW, E.C.4. MCMXXV !:■ I % % Church of God General Conference: McDonough, GA, https://coggc.org/ EARLIER LIFE-TRUTH EXPONENTS BY Church of God General Conference: McDonough, GA, https://coggc.org/ A. J. MILLS. WITH FOREWORD BY ROBERT K. STRANG, Editor of Words of Life. price 15 Cents. NATIONAL BIBLE INSTITUTION OREGON, ILLINOIS. CANADA: R. II. JUDD, GRAFTON, ONTARIO. LONDON: ELLIOT STOCK, 7, PATERNOSTER ROW, E.C.4. MCMXXV Church of God General Conference: McDonough, GA, https://coggc.org/ EARLIER LIFE-TRUTH EXPONENTS. By A. J. MILLS, Thames Ditton. [Reprinted from 'Words of Life."] I. It is proposed, in the following pages, to give, in brief outline, what may be known of earlier life-truth exponents, whose works and testimony remain to this day. It is generally recognized that the doctrine now known as Conditional Immortality is by no means modern, those who hold the teaching affirming that, as far back in history as Gen. ii. and iii, the conditions were laid down under which man, if he had continued in obedience, might have remained in life and being. ChurchPassing of God Generalon from Conference:that McDonough,remote GA, https://coggc.org/period, there is ample evidence in the Scriptures that life, continuous, permanent life, would only be given to man upon the fulfilment of certain conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancienneté Among the Non-Jurors: a Study of Henry Dodwell
    History of European Ideas ISSN: 0191-6599 (Print) 1873-541X (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rhei20 Ancienneté among the Non-Jurors: a study of Henry Dodwell C.D.A. Leighton To cite this article: C.D.A. Leighton (2005) Ancienneté among the Non-Jurors: a study of Henry Dodwell, History of European Ideas, 31:1, 1-16, DOI: 10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2003.08.011 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2003.08.011 Published online: 03 Jan 2012. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 40 Citing articles: 2 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rhei20 ARTICLE IN PRESS History of European Ideas 31 (2005) 1–16 Anciennete! among the Non-Jurors: a study of Henry Dodwell C.D.A. Leighton* I.’ I.S.B.’ Fak., Bilkent Universitesi,. Bilkent 06800, Ankara, Turkey Abstract The article offers a study of the theological method of Henry Dodwell, the most distinguished British savant of the late Stuart period and a leading figure in the Non-Juring movement. The study takes the form of arguments for the extension of the contemporary dispute between the Ancients and Moderns, in its historiographical dimension, into the field of divinity; for substantial modification of the claims made in discussions of the dispute about the inherent conflict between the Renaissance’s desire for revivification of the past and its historical scholarship; and for reconsideration of the relationship between 17th century critical scholarship and the Enlightenment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Henry Dodwell C.D.A
    This article was downloaded by: [Bilkent University] On: 22 April 2014, At: 08:03 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK History of European Ideas Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rhei20 Ancienneté among the Non-Jurors: a study of Henry Dodwell C.D.A. Leighton a a İ.İ.S.B. Fak., Bilkent Üniversitesi , Bilkent 06800, Ankara, Turkey Published online: 03 Jan 2012. To cite this article: C.D.A. Leighton (2005) Ancienneté among the Non-Jurors: a study of Henry Dodwell, History of European Ideas, 31:1, 1-16, DOI: 10.1016/ j.histeuroideas.2003.08.011 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2003.08.011 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Book PDF Download
    Republican learning . i MUP/Champion/Prelims 1 27/2/03, 10:06 am Contents Politics, culture and society in early modern Britain General editors professor ann hughes dr anthony milton professor peter lake This important series publishes monographs that take a fresh and challenging look at the interactions between politics, culture and society in Britain between 1500 and the mid-eighteenth century. It counteracts the fragmentation of current historiography through encouraging a variety of approaches which attempt to redefine the political, social and cultural worlds, and to explore their interconnection in a flexible and creative fashion. All the volumes in the series question and transcend traditional inter- disciplinary boundaries, such as those between political history and literary studies, social history and divinity, urban history and anthropology. They contribute to a broader understanding of crucial developments in early modern Britain. Already published in the series Leicester and the Court: essays on Elizabethan politics simon adams Ambition and failure in Stuart England: the career of John, first Viscount Scudamore ian atherton The idea of property in seventeenth-century England: tithes and the individual laura brace Betting on lives: the culture of life insurance in England, 1695–1775 geoffrey clark Home divisions: aristocracy, the state and provincial conflict thomas cogswell A religion of the world: the defence of the reformation in the reign of Edward VI catharine davies Cromwell’s major-generals: godly government during
    [Show full text]
  • Cathedrals and the Church of England, C.1660-1714
    Cathedrals and the Church of England, c.1660-1714 Alice Jeanne Soulieux-Evans Wolfson College March 2019 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. This dissertation is 76,245 words long, excluding footnotes and bibliography. It does not, therefore, exceed the prescribed word limit, of 80,000 words, for the Degree Committee of the Faculty of History. ………………………….….………………… Mrs Alice Soulieux-Evans Tuesday 19th March, 2019 i ii CATHEDRALS AND THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND, C.1660-1714 ALICE SOULIEUX-EVANS Early modern cathedrals have often found themselves falling between the historiographical cracks. While antiquarians and art historians have seen their early modern pasts as nothing more than periods of ‘desecration and pillage’, early modern historians have dismissed cathedrals as medieval ‘fossils’, irrelevant and impermeable to the religious upheavals of the English Reformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Champion Libraries
    ‘The fodder of our understanding’: Benjamin Furly’s library and intellectual conversation c1680-1714’ Justin Champion Dept of History Royal Holloway College University of London Benjamin Furly, merchant of Rotterdam was extraordinarily proud of his library: such was the reknown and popularity of his intellectual hospitality that his close friend Anthony Ashley Cooper (the third Earl of Shaftesbury) declined his offer of accomodation on the grounds that the house was too ‘public’ for his requirements of ‘easy and private’ philosophical tranquillity. 1 From the early 1680s the reputation of Furly’s library attracted many learned and philosophically avant garde visitors (readers?): it is this combination of intellectual resource (the books) and space of sociability that has been so intriguing to historians of ideas. Although there has been no serious study of Benjamin Furly since that of William Hull in the 1930s 2 substantial research materials do exist in the form of a record of much of the material in his library provided by the sales-catalogue of 1714, and the large quantity of correspondence with a range of late seventeenth century figures. Indeed the evidence of the correspondence suggests that Furly can provide the historian with a significant pathway into the sociability and life of the world of ideas in the period. Furly knew (amongst many others) Huguenot refugees like Pierre Bayle and men of learning like the Remonstrant Jean Leclerc; radical Whig figures, most importantly John Locke and Shaftesbury, but also writers and gentlemen like John Toland, and Anthony Collins, as well as men associated with the radical publishing side of the republic of letters like Charles Levier, Thomas Johnson and Jean Aymon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Religion of the Non-Jurors and the Early British Enlightenment: a Study of Henry Dodwell
    History of European Ideas ISSN: 0191-6599 (Print) 1873-541X (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rhei20 The religion of the Non-Jurors and the early British enlightenment: a study of Henry Dodwell C.D.A. Leighton To cite this article: C.D.A. Leighton (2002) The religion of the Non-Jurors and the early British enlightenment: a study of Henry Dodwell, History of European Ideas, 28:4, 247-262, DOI: 10.1016/ S0191-6599(02)00043-8 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-6599(02)00043-8 Published online: 03 Jan 2012. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 54 View related articles Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rhei20 Download by: [Bilkent University] Date: 25 August 2017, At: 04:12 History of European Ideas 28 (2002) 247–262 The religion of the Non-Jurors and the early British enlightenment: a study of Henry Dodwell C.D.A. Leighton* Bilkent Universitesi,. I.’ I.S.B.F.’ (Tarih Bol. um. u),. 06533 Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey Abstract The article considers the fundamental motivations and associated theological thought of those involved in the Non-Juring schism in the Church of England in the period after the Revolution of 1688. It indicates and exemplifies how that thought is to be related to wider intellectual conflicts of the period, considered as constituting an early phase of Enlightenment/ Counter-Enlightenment debate. The works of the leading Non-Juror theologian, Henry Dodwell, and in particular his writings on the destiny of the soul, serve as an area of focus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Non-Jurors and Their History
    The Journal of Religious History Vol. 29, No. 3, October 2005 BlackwellOxford,JORHJournal0022-4227©293ORIGIONALthe 2005 non AssociationofUK-jurors Publishing,Religious ARTICLE and forHistory Ltd.their the Journal history of Religious History journal of religious history C. D. A. LEIGHTON The Non-Jurors and their History This paper is concerned to establish and elucidate the intellectual distinctiveness of the Anglican Non-Jurors of the late Stuart and early Hanoverian period. It places the Non-Jurors in the context of the early Counter-Enlightenment and finds their distinctiveness within it, as a body, in the extent and intensity of their commitment to rationalist, critical historical study as a theological method, reflecting a primitivist, or more precisely, restorationist religious stance. The writings of Charles Leslie and Jeremy Collier are those chiefly used in exemplification. The concluding part of the study enquires into the sources of the Non-Jurors’ confidence in the value of historical argument in controversy. It points particularly to the Non-Jurors’ use of the practices of contemporary historiography, which regulated the application of ration- alism by requiring concurrent application of doctrinal and moral standards. This study is concerned with the writings revealing a study of the past, which came from the pens of those Anglicans who rejected the accommodation — and communion with those disposed to accept it — between their church and the regime established in the British Isles in the wake of the successful Dutch invasion of the late seventeenth century.1 Jacobite political commitment comes quickly to mind as offering some explanation of Non-Jurors’ particular zeal for historical and antiquarian studies; for search for historical precedent, often from seemingly recherché sources, was at the heart of the period’s con- stitutional debates.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiquarian & Modern
    Blackwell’s Rare Books Blackwell’S rare books ANTIQUARIAN & MODERN Blackwell’s Rare Books 48-51 Broad Street, Oxford, OX1 3BQ Direct Telephone: +44 (0) 1865 333555 Switchboard: +44 (0) 1865 792792 Email: [email protected] Fax: +44 (0) 1865 794143 www.blackwell.co.uk/ rarebooks Our premises are in the main Blackwell’s bookstore at 48-51 Broad Street, one of the largest and best known in the world, housing over 200,000 new book titles, covering every subject, discipline and interest, as well as a large secondhand books department. There is lift access to each floor. The bookstore is in the centre of the city, opposite the Bodleian Library and Sheldonian Theatre, and close to several of the colleges and other university buildings, with on street parking close by. Oxford is at the centre of an excellent road and rail network, close to the London - Birmingham (M40) motorway and is served by a frequent train service from London (Paddington). Hours: Monday–Saturday 9am to 6pm. (Tuesday 9:30am to 6pm.) Purchases: We are always keen to purchase books, whether single works or in quantity, and will be pleased to make arrangements to view them. Auction commissions: We attend a number of auction sales and will be happy to execute commissions on your behalf. Blackwell’s online bookshop www.blackwell.co.uk Our extensive online catalogue of new books caters for every speciality, with the latest releases and editor’s recommendations. We have something for everyone. Select from our subject areas, reviews, highlights, promotions and more. Orders and correspondence should in every case be sent to our Broad Street address (all books subject to prior sale).
    [Show full text]
  • The Life of Thomas Ken, D. D
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com THOMAS KEN, D.D. T ' L K ; r*' i i i i vr 5 v : A- * - v _ ' * i L i. A. : ,'■/.■//. ' ■>. ■ ■ - .' I ■ * • V- ► . -„ £ THE LIFE OF THOMAS KEN, D.D. BISHOP OF BATH AND WELLS By E. H? fLUMP TEE, D.D. A K DEAN OF WELLS WITH ILLUSTRATIONS BY E. WHYMIER " Of whom the world was not worthy." " Isti sunt triumphatores et amici Dei, qui, contemnentis jussa principum, merucrunt prrcmia ajterna : Modo coronantur et aecipiunt palmam. Isti sunt qui venerunt ex magna tribulatione ut laverunt stolas suaa in sanguine Agni : Modo coronantur et aecipiunt palmam." IN TWO VOLUMES VOL. II. geconb (fMtton "&cv\icb WITH ADDITIONAL LETTERS TO QUEEN MARY AND OTHERS LONDON Wm. ISBISTER Limited 15 & 1G TAVISTOCK STREET COVENT GARDEN 1890 v. z Steele ' 7 . 9 5^ 3L I TABLE OF CONTENTS. vol. n. XVIII. TAOK THE TRIAL OF THE SEVEN BISHOPS, A.D. 1688 . 1 XIX. THE REVOLUTION OF A.D. 1688 24 XX. HESITATION — FINAL DECISION — DEPARTURE FROM WELLS, A.D. 1689 — 1691 37 Note. — BISHOP KIDDER 60 XXI. KEN AND THE NON-JURORS TO THE DEATH OF MARY, A.D. 1689 — 1694 . 64 Notes. — l. THE JACOBITE LITURGY AND MODEST ENQUIRY 82 2. KEN'S LETTER TO ARCHBISHOP TENISON . 86 XXII. KEN AND THE NON - JURORS TO THE DEATH OF WILLIAM III., A.D. 1694 — 1702 95 Note. — DID KEN WRITE 'THE ROYAL SUFFERER?'.
    [Show full text]