DOCSLIB.ORG

The Crown and Prime Minister

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Crown and Prime Minister Northumbria Research Link Citation: Moosavian, Rebecca (2009) Prime ministerial exercise of the war prerogative in the Iraq affair: an analysis. Masters thesis, Northumbria University. This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/2757/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/policies.html Prime Ministerial Exercise of the War Prerogative in the Iraq Affair: An Analysis. Rebecca Zaytoonnejad Moosavian MPhil 2009 Prime Ministerial Exercise of the War Prerogative in the Iraq Affair: An Analysis Rebecca Zaytoonnejad Moosavian LL.B (Hons), PCAP, Solicitor (non-practising) This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Master of Philosophy of the University of Northumbria at Newcastle. School of Law August 2009 Abstract ‘Prime Ministerial Exercise of the War Prerogative in the Iraq Affair: An Analysis’ This study sets out to investigate an arcane, ancient and currently unreformed area of the British constitution; the war prerogative. This Crown power continues to lie with the monarch at law, though in political reality it is exercised by the Prime Minister with the support of Parliament. The war power has come to vest in the Prime Minister due to the office’s colonisation and resultingly close interrelationship with the institution of monarchy. The study will argue that there are prevailing cultural, structural and legal influences of monarchy which potentially benefit the premier in his exercise of the war prerogative. This and related issues will be afforded specific and detailed consideration in the context of the March 2003 decision to deploy troops in Iraq. The Iraq affair constitutes an invaluable case study as one of the most controversial warfare decisions in recent history, one that generated topical debate and new scrutiny of the war prerogative. This study conducts a detailed investigation of the legal and constitutional checks and balances upon the prime ministerial war prerogative with specific focus upon their operation in the Iraq affair. The study discusses significant shortcomings in the functioning of constitutional checks in the lead up to military action in Iraq, particularly the convention of collective Cabinet responsibility and the requirement that Parliament supports warfare. The study also appraises the efficacy of legal checks upon the war and related prerogatives in the judicial arena; it considers developments over the course of the broad Iraq period, paying specific attention to advances in judicial review. The roles of constitutional components such as the Crown and conventions in these constitutional dynamics are identified and analysed where relevant. Furthermore, the extent to which post-Iraq proposed reforms might overhaul the area and address constitutional inadequacies will be considered. In undertaking its investigation into this constitutional area the study employs two analytical devices which provide illuminating insights upon the war power, the checks upon it and its exercise by Mr Blair in the Iraq affair. The first device involves the identification and exploration of divergences between the legal framework governing this area and the political reality occurring beneath. Applying this device exposes material contradictions between the law and reality in this area, allows the accuracy and efficacy of legal terminology to be assessed and finally reveals assumptions or ideologies underlying the legal framework. Over the course of this study it is argued that the various disparities between the law and political reality in this area act to benefit the Prime Minister in his exercise of the war prerogative. The second device entails careful consideration of the role of boundaries between law and non-law (particularly politics) in this area. Such boundaries play a central role in judicial understandings of both conventions and prerogative power, and are vital to the maintenance of coherence and legal purity in this area. This study focuses particularly upon the judicial erection of boundaries that distinguish between justiciable and non-justiciable prerogatives such as the war power. It demonstrates that despite appearances of progress in judicial review, these boundaries are based upon selective judicial interpretations and approaches to evidence which inherently act to favour government. Thus, in disputes concerning the war and related prerogatives the judiciary is institutionally incapable of political neutrality, instead being geared towards the support of strong government. Contents Contents Table of Cases Table of Statutes Table of International Sources of Law Acknowledgements Declaration Introduction Aims of Study Emergence of the Office The Blair Premiership Overall Structure of Study Analytical Approach to be Adopted in this Study: [1] Divergence between framework and practice [2] The role of boundaries between law and non-law Chapter One Use of the War Power in Iraq: Political Background [1] Background to the Iraq ‘War’: Chronology [1.1] Early 2002: Policy Towards Iraq Changes [1.2] April 2002 Onwards: Cabinet Weakened [1.3] September 2002: Dossier Published [1.4] November 2002 – March 2003: UN Negotiations [1.5] March 2003: The Attorney General’s Advice [1.6] 18th March 2003: The Parliamentary Vote [1.7] July 2004: Dossier Discredited [1.8] March 2003-Present: Military Involvement in Iraq [2] Relevant Constitutional Issues Identified Chapter Two The Crown and Prime Minister [1] The Three Meanings of ‘The Crown’ [1.1] The Crown as Monarch [1.2] The Crown as Government [1.3] The Crown as State [2] The Crown and Law [2.1] The Apex of Legal Power [2.2] The Role of Monarch in Law [3] The Crown and Prime Minister [4] Disparity: the Crown as a ‘Legal Fiction’ Chapter Three Conventions, the Prime Minister and the War Prerogative [1] Conventions Concerning the Prime Minister [2] Conventions Defined [2.1] Common Definitions [2.1.1] A convention is a constitutional rule or practice [2.1.2] A convention has a binding quality [2.1.3] A convention has an ethical, normative or moral dimension [2.1.4] A convention is distinct from a law and is not enforced in courts [2.2] The Flexibility of Conventions [3] Conventions Throughout the Iraq Affair [3.1] The Monarch Must Act upon Ministerial Advice [3.2] Collective Cabinet Responsibility [3.3] Parliamentary Approval of War [4] Analysis [4.1] Conventions and the Discrepancy Between the Constitutional Framework and Reality [4.1.1] The Distinctions Identified [4.1.2] The Role of ‘Convention’ in the Disparity [4.2] The Role of Boundaries in relation to Conventions Chapter Four Prerogative and Prime Minister [1] Legal Views of Prerogative [1.1] Narrow Prerogative [1.2] Wider Diceyan Prerogative [2] Significant Prerogative Powers of the Prime Minister in the Iraq Affair [2.1] Power to Appoint Cabinet Ministers [2.1.1] The Appointment Power: General Points [2.1.2] Prime Ministerial Appointment of the Attorney General [2.2] Cabinet Chairmanship Powers [2.3] Power to Request a Dissolution of Parliament [2.4] Additional Wider Prerogative Powers [2.4.1] The Foreign Affairs Prerogative at Law [2.4.2] The Defence Prerogative at Law [3] The War Prerogative [3.1] Judicial Involvement with the War Prerogative [3.1.1] Judicial Review of Prerogative: General Principles [3.1.2] The Judiciary and the War Prerogative [3.2] Parliamentary Involvement with the War Prerogative [3.2.1] Parliament and Prerogative: General Principles [3.2.2] Parliament and the War Prerogative [3.2.3] Post-Blair Proposed Reforms to the War Prerogative [3.3] Traditions of Leadership and the War Prerogative [4] The Prerogative Analysed [4.1] Disparity between Legal Framework and Reality [4.2] The Role of Boundaries in Prerogative Chapter Five Caselaw Concerning the War and Related Prerogatives During and After the Iraq Affair [1] Overview of Developments in Legal Checks over the Broad Iraq Period [1.1] Abbasi v Foreign Secretary [2002] [1.2] C.N.D. v Prime Minister [2002] [1.3] Al Rawi v Foreign Secretary [1.3.1] Al Rawi in the Divisional Court [2006] [1.3.2] Al Rawi in the Court of Appeal [2007] [1.4] Gentle v Prime Minister [1.4.1] Gentle in the Court of Appeal [2006] [1.4.2] Gentle in the House of Lords [2008] [1.5] Summary of Developments [2] The Law-Politics Boundaries in Iraq Caselaw [2.1] CND v Prime Minister [2.2] Al Rawi (Divisional Court) [2.3] Gentle in the Court of Appeal [2.4] Summary of Discussion [3] Disparities between Law and Reality [3.1] Disparities Identified [3.2] Views of Knowledge and Expertise in Iraq Caselaw Knowledge and Expertise in CND v Prime Minister Knowledge and Expertise in Al Rawi (Divisional Court) Knowledge and Expertise in Al Rawi (Court of Appeal) Conclusion [1] Aim 1: Understandings
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chequers Estate and Other Property and for Purposes Connected Therewith
    [7 & 8.GEO. 5.] Chequere Estate Act, 1917. [CH. 55.] ,CHAPTER 55. An,;Act..ta confirm,.,and give effect to a deed of settlement A.D. 1917. relating to the Chequers Estate and other property and for purposes connected therewith. [20th December 11917.] by a deed of settlement dated the twenty-fourth W day of November nineteen hundred and seventeen and made between Sir Arthur Hamilton Lee (hereinafter referred to as " Sir Arthur Lee ") of the first part, Dame Ruth Moore Lee, the wife of Sir Arthur Lee (hereinafter referred to as "Lady Lee "), of the second part, Allan Ernest Messer and Arthur Edward. Nicholls of the third part, and the Public Trustee of : the fourth part (which deed is set out in the schedule to ` this Act), the landed property' (hereinafter referred to as " the Chequers Estate "), chattels and money therein described, are settled upon the trusts and for the purposes mentioned in the said deed : And whereas the trusts created by the said deed cannot take effect without the authority of Parliament, and it is expedient that the said trusts should have full force and validity : Be it therefore enacted by the King's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : 1. The said deed of settlement is hereby confirmed, and confirmation have effect as if enacted in this Act, in odeed shall but nothing this settlement. Act shall prejudice or affect the right, title, or interest, if any, of any person in or to the Chequers Estate other than the right, title, or interest of the parties to the said deed of the first, second, and third parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Ministerial Exercise of the War Prerogative in the Iraq Affair: an Analysis
    Prime Ministerial Exercise of the War Prerogative in the Iraq Affair: An Analysis. Rebecca Zaytoonnejad Moosavian MPhil 2009 Prime Ministerial Exercise of the War Prerogative in the Iraq Affair: An Analysis Rebecca Zaytoonnejad Moosavian LL.B (Hons), PCAP, Solicitor (non-practising) This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Master of Philosophy of the University of Northumbria at Newcastle. School of Law August 2009 Abstract ‘Prime Ministerial Exercise of the War Prerogative in the Iraq Affair: An Analysis’ This study sets out to investigate an arcane, ancient and currently unreformed area of the British constitution; the war prerogative. This Crown power continues to lie with the monarch at law, though in political reality it is exercised by the Prime Minister with the support of Parliament. The war power has come to vest in the Prime Minister due to the office’s colonisation and resultingly close interrelationship with the institution of monarchy. The study will argue that there are prevailing cultural, structural and legal influences of monarchy which potentially benefit the premier in his exercise of the war prerogative. This and related issues will be afforded specific and detailed consideration in the context of the March 2003 decision to deploy troops in Iraq. The Iraq affair constitutes an invaluable case study as one of the most controversial warfare decisions in recent history, one that generated topical debate and new scrutiny of the war prerogative. This study conducts a detailed investigation of the legal and constitutional checks and balances upon the prime ministerial war prerogative with specific focus upon their operation in the Iraq affair.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Constitution for the UK
    Contents Page Mapping the Path towards Codifying - or Not Codifying - the UK Constitution ROBERT BLACKBURN, PhD, LLD, Solicitor Professor of Constitutional Law Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies King's College London PROGRAMME OF RESEARCH Aims This programme of research has been prepared at the formal request1 of the House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee chaired by Graham Allen MP to assist its inquiry, and the policy debate generally, on the proposal to codify - or not - the UK constitution. The work been prepared in an impartial way, adopting a pragmatic approach to the issues involved, and does not seek to advocate either codification or non-codification. Its purpose is to inform the inquiry of the issues involved and, in the event that a government in the future might wish to implement such a proposal, it seeks to provide a starting point and set of papers to help facilitate the complex and sensitive issues of substance and process that would be involved. Structure of the Research The content starts (Part I) by identifying, and giving a succinct account of, the arguments for and against a written constitution, prepared in rhetorical manner. It then (Part II) sets out a series of three illustrative blueprints, prepared in the belief that a consideration of detailed alternative models on how a codified constitution might be designed and drafted will better inform and advance the debate on the desirability or not of writing down the constitution into one documentary source. These are - (1) Constitutional Code - a document sanctioned by Parliament but without statutory authority, setting out the essential existing elements and principles of the constitution and workings of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Holdings Act 1986
    Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 1986 CHAPTER 5 An Act to consolidate certain enactments relating to agricultural holdings, with amendments to give effect to recommendations of the Law Commission. [18th March 1986] Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— Annotations: Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 A Table showing the derivation of the provisions of this consolidation Act will be found at the end of the Act. The Table has no official status. C2 Act modified by Opencast Coal Act 1958 (c. 69, SIF 86), s. 14(2)–(4) as substituted by Housing and Planning Act 1986 (c. 63, SIF 86), s. 39(3), Sch. 8 para. 5 C3 Act excluded (1.9.1995) by 1995 c. 8, ss. 4(1), 41(2) (with s. 37) C4 Act excluded (3.11.1994) by 1991 c. 53, s. 84(3)(d) (as substituted by 1994 c. 33, s. 96) C5 Act (except Sch. 12 para. 4(1)(a)): transfer of functions (1.7.1999) by S.I. 1999/672, art. 2, Sch. 1 C6 Act excluded (1.8.2000) by 1999 c. 33, s.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Account of the Evolution of the Prime Minister's Role in the UK
    Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza Cattedra di Public Comparative Law Comparative account of the evolution of the Prime Minister’s role in the United Kingdom and the other Commonwealth Realms: the constitutional relationship with the Head of State RELATORE Gent.mo dott. Giovanni Piccirilli CANDIDATO Renato Paolocci Matr. 108583 CORRELATORE Chiar.mo prof. Gino Scaccia ANNO ACCADEMICO 2017/2018 Index of content Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4 I. Aim of the comparison .................................................................................................................. 4 II. The concept of “Commonwealth Realm” and the choice of Australia, Canada and New Zealand ............................................................................................................................................... 7 III. Structure of the comparison ...................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 1 ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Prime Minister and Sovereign in the United Kingdom ................................................................................ 10 1.1 Origins and historical development of the Prime Minister office in the United Kingdom . 10 1.1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Role and Powers of the Prime Minister
    1 House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Role and powers of the Prime Minister Written Evidence Only those submissions written specifically for the Committee and accepted by the Committee as evidence for the inquiry Role and powers of the Prime Minister are included. Ordered to be published 3 and 10 March 2011 2 List of written evidence Page 1 Paul Webb, Professor of Politics, University of Sussex 3 2 Professor the Lord Hennessy of Nympsfield, FBA 8 3 Professor George Jones, London School of Economics and Political Science 17 4 Dr Nicholas Allen, Department of Politics and International Relations, Royal Holloway, University of London 24 5 Dr Eoin O’Malley, School of Law and Government, Dublin City University 29 6 Dr Mark Bennister, Lecturer in Politics, Canterbury Christ Church University 33 7 Dr Richard Heffernan, Reader in Government, The Open University 36 8 Mr Elfyn Llwyd MP, Parliamentary Leader of Plaid Cymru 41 9 Professor Kevin Theakston and Dr Timothy Heppell, School of Politics and International Studies, University of Leeds 43 10 Professor Martin Smith and Professor David Richards, Department of Politics, University of Sheffield 47 11 Sir Gus O’Donnell KCB, Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Home Civil Service 52, 53 12 Professor Ludger Helms, Chair of Comparative Politics, University of Innsbruck 54 13 Green Party of England and Wales 59 14 Rt Hon Carwyn Jones AM, First Minister of Wales 63 15 Rt Hon Alex Salmond MSP, First Minister of Scotland 66 3 4 Written evidence submitted by Paul Webb, Professor of Politics, University of Sussex This submission comes in response to an invitation from the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • A Parliament Act
    International Law Research; Vol. 10, No. 1; 2021 ISSN 1927-5234 E-ISSN 1927-5242 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Modernising the Constitution - A Parliament Act Graham McBain1,2 1 Peterhouse, Cambridge, UK 2 Harvard Law School, USA Correspondence: Graham McBain, 21 Millmead Terrace, Guildford, Surrey GU2 4AT, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received: January 6, 2021 Accepted: February 3, 2021 Online Published: February 12, 2021 doi:10.5539/ilr.v10n1p101 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v10n1p101 A previous article has looked at modernising the law on the Crown, see Modernising the Constitution - A Crown Act.1 This article looks at the same in respect of Parliament. It may be noted, from the outset, that the legislation - and common law - on Parliament, is much simpler and less complicated than that on the Crown. Indeed, a large amount of this legislation is administrative (mundane) in nature. Also, much is non-contentious, having given rise to little caselaw. Further, there is a compelling case for consolidation since there are, presently, c. 68 Acts relating to Parliament, but they contain only c. 280 sections and much of the same is obsolete or couched in antiquated language which is scarcely intelligible. Thus, the essential issues are the following: Consolidation of Parliamentary Legislation; Modernising Crown Prerogatives relating to Parliament. In the latter case, most Crown prerogatives are now obsolete - as reflects the position after the Glorious Revolution of 1688. And, the few worth retaining should be placed in legislation - in order to give greater consistency and coherency to the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Chequers Estate Act 1917 (C
    Chequers Estate Act 1917 (c. 55) 1 SCHEDULE Document Generated: 2021-04-30 Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Chequers Estate Act 1917, SCHEDULE. (See end of Document for details) SCHEDULE Sir Arthur Hamilton Lee of Chequers in the county of Buckingham, having expressed his desire and intention to transfer forthwith the ownership of the Chequers Estate together with certain chattels and moneys as a free gift (in trust) to the nation subject to the conditions hereinafter set forth, and in order that the house may be used and maintained in perpetuity as the official country residence of the British Prime Minister, and having more particularly explained the object of his gift in the following words:— “It is not possible to foresee or foretell from what classes or conditions of life the future wielders of power in this country will be drawn. Some may be as in the past men of wealth and famous descent; some may belong to the world of trade and business; others may spring from the ranks of the manual toilers. To none of these in the midst of their strenuous and responsible labours could the spirit and anodyne of Chequers do anything but good. In the city-bred man especially, the periodic contact with the most typical rural life would create and preserve a just sense of proportion between the claims of town and country. To the revolutionary statesman the antiquity and calm tenacity of Chequers and its annals might suggest some saving virtues in the continuity of English history and exercise a check upon too hasty upheavals, whilst even the most reactionary could scarcely be insensible to the spirit of human freedom which permeates the countryside of Hampden, Burke and Milton.
    [Show full text]
  • Settled Land Act 1925
    Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Settled Land Act 1925. (See end of Document for details) Settled Land Act 1925 1925 CHAPTER 18 15 and 16 Geo 5 An Act to consolidate the enactments relating to settled land in England and Wales. [9th April 1925] Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Powers of tenant for life and trustees of settlement under this Act conferred on trustees for sale by Law of Property Act 1925 (c. 20), s. 28(1) and Forestry Act 1967 (c. 10), s. 5(4), Sch. 2 para. 1(1)-(3); applied by Land Registration Act 1925 (c. 21), ss. 40(2), 91(1) C2 Words of enactment omitted under authority of Statute Law Revision Act 1948 (c. 62), s. 3 C3 Act extended by Local Land Charges Act 1975 (c. 76, SIF 98:2), ss. 11(3), 19(2), by Highways Act 1980 (c. 66, SIF 59), s. 87(4)(a) and by Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986 (No. 3, SIF 21:4), ss. 33(4), 35(1) C4 Act modified by S.I. 1989/1379, art. 3(6) C5 Act: Definition of "settlement" applied (25.9.1991) by Land Compensation Act 1961 (c. 33, SIF 28:1), s. 27, Sch. 3 (as inserted 25.9.1991 by Planning and Compensation Act 1991 (c. 34, SIF:28:1), s. 66, Schedule 14 para. 2); S.I. 1991/2067, art. 3 Act applied (1.11.1993) by 1993 c. 28, s. 34(3)(a); S.I. 1993/2134, arts.2,5 Act applied (30.10.1994) by S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Chequers Estate Act 1917
    Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Chequers Estate Act 1917. (See end of Document for details) Chequers Estate Act 1917 1917 CHAPTER 55 7 and 8 Geo 5 U.K. An Act to confirm and give effect to a deed of settlement relating to the Chequers Estate and other property and for purposes connected therewith. [20th December 1917] Whereas by a deed of settlement dated the twenty-fourth day of November nineteen hundred and seventeen and made between Sir Arthur Hamilton Lee (hereinafter referred to as “Sir Arthur Lee”) of the first part, Dame Ruth Moore Lee, the wife of Sir Arthur Lee (hereinafter referred to as “Lady Lee”), of the second part, Allan Ernest Messer and Arthur Edward Nicholls of the third part, and the Public Trustee of the fourth part (which deed is set out in the Schedule to this Act), the landed property (hereinafter referred to as “the Chequers Estate”), chattels and money therein described, are settled upon the trusts and for the purposes mentioned in the said deed: And whereas the trusts created by the said deed cannot take effect without the authority of Parliament, and it is expedient that the said trusts should have full force and validity: Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act: transfer of functions (5.11.2014) by The Transfer of Functions (Chequers and Dorneywood Estates) Order 2014 (S.I. 2014/2708), art. 2 (with arts. 4, 5) C2 Act functions transferred (14.12.2016) by The Transfer of Functions (Chequers and Dorneywood Estates) Order 2016 (S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Konwenanse Konstytucyjne
    KONWENANSE KONSTYTUCYJNE Tomasz Wieciech KONWENANSE KONSTYTUCYJNE Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Publikacja fi nansowana przez Uniwersytet Jagielloński ze środków Instytutu Nauk Politycznych i Stosunków Międzynarodowych Recenzent dr hab. Krzysztof Wójtowicz, prof. UWr © Copyright by Tomasz Wieciech & Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Wydanie I, Kraków 2011 All rights reserved Niniejszy utwór ani żaden jego fragment nie może być reprodukowany, przetwarzany i rozpowszech- niany w jakikolwiek sposób za pomocą urządzeń elektronicznych, mechanicznych, kopiujących, nagrywających i innych oraz nie może być przechowywany w żadnym systemie informatycznym bez uprzedniej pisemnej zgody Wydawcy. ISBN 978-83-233-3121-6 www.wuj.pl Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Redakcja: ul. Michałowskiego 9/2, 31-126 Kraków tel. 12-631-18-81, 12-631-18-82, fax 12-631-18-83 Dystrybucja: tel. 12-631-01-97, tel./fax 12-631-01-98 tel. kom. 0506-006-674, e-mail: [email protected] Konto: PEKAO SA, nr 80 1240 4722 1111 0000 4856 3325 Mojej Mamie oraz pamięci mego Ojca Spis treści Wstęp ................................................................................................................ 9 ROZDZIAŁ I Konwenanse jako normy konstytucji materialnej ................................................. 13 1. Historyczny proces kształtowania się „konwenansowej konstytucji” ............ 14 2. Wokół defi nicji ............................................................................................ 18 3. Powstawanie konwenansów ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • La'v of the Constitution Introduction
    INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE LA'V OF THE CONSTITUTION INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE LAW OF THE CONSTITUTION BY A. V. DICEY, K.C., HoN. D.C.L. OF THE INNER TEMPLE; FORMERLY VINERIAN PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH LAW, FELLOW OF ALL SOULS COLLEGE, OXFORD, HON U.D. CAMBRIDGE, GLASGOW, AND EDINBURGH TENTH EDITION WITH INTRODUCTION BY E. C. S. WADE, Q.C., M.A., LL.D., F.B.A. DOWNING PROFESSOR EMERITUS OF THE LAWS OF E:-IGLAND IN THE UNIVERSITY m· CA~IBRIDGE; FELWW OF GONVILLE AND CAIUS COLI,EGE CAMBRIDGE; HONORARY BENCHER OF INNER TEMPI,E; H0:-1. D.C.L. DURHUI M ISBN 978-0-333-05255-6 ISBN 978-1-349-17968-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-17968-8 This book is copyright in all countries which are signatories to the Berne Convention Reprint of the original edition 1979 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission First Edition 1885. Second Edition 1886. Third Edition 1880. Fourth Edition 1893. Fifth Edition 1897 Sixth Edition 1902. Seventh Edition 1908. Eight Edition 1915. Reprinted 1920 (twice) Reprinted 1923, 1924, 1926, 1927, 1931. Ninth Edition 1939. Reprinted 1941, 1945, 1948, 1950, 1952 1956. Tenth Edition 1959. Reprinted 1960, 1961, 1962, 1964,1965,1967,1973, 1975, 1979 Published by THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD London and Basingstoke Associated companies in New York Dublin Melbourne Johannesburg and Madras SBN 333 01536 3 (hard cover) 333 05255 2 (paper cover) The paperback edition of this book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not.
    [Show full text]