2016-008165Drp

Discretionary Review Abbreviated Analysis HEARING DATE: JULY 12, 2018

Date: July 5, 2018 Case No.: 2016-008165DRP Project Address: 521 Los Palmos Drive Zoning: RH-1 [Residential – House, One Family] 40-X Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 3054/068 Project Sponsor: Ann-Marie Zacharia Gordon Atkinson Architecture, AIA 735A Taraval Street San Francisco, CA, 94127 Staff Contact: Elizabeth Jonckheer – (415) 575-8728 [email protected] Recommendation: Do not take DR and approve as proposed

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The proposal includes a 470 square foot third story addition, and a second floor remodel that includes replacement of the existing second floor rear sunroom. The existing windowed sunroom is 198 square feet (roughly 10 by 20 feet), and measures 8 feet 10 inches in height. The sunroom will be replaced with a 133 square foot walled structure (8 feet 10 inches by 15 feet 1 inch), approximately 9 feet 6 inches in height, with a sliding door to a sun deck at the rear, and windows to the east. The proposed sun deck off the second floor is approximately 53 square feet. The second floor structure and the deck are set in 5 feet 1 inch and 5 feet at the sides. The third floor addition is set back approximately 12 feet 4 inches from the existing rear building wall, and includes a 36 square foot deck within the footprint of the addition. All new façades propose vertical siding. The existing building height is 19 feet 2 inches as measured from the front property line. The proposed building height at the addition would be 20 feet 10 inches. No changes are proposed to the front façade.

SITE DESCRIPTION AND PRESENT USE

The project is located on south side of Los Palmos Drive near the Lulu Alley stairway between Burlwood Drive and Bella Vista Way, in Block 3054, Lot 068. The subject property is located within the RH-1 (Residential–House, One Family) Zoning District and the 40-X Height and Bulk District. The property is down sloping from the front to the rear property line, and developed with a two story, residential, single- family structure as seen from the front. The subject property has a rear yard of 25 feet.

SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND NEIGHBORHOOD

The subject property is located West of Twin Peaks in the Westwood Highlands neighborhood, just south of Mount Davidson. Adjacent properties on Los Palmos Drive are single-family structures, similarly

www.sfplanning.org Executive Summary CASE NO. 2016-008165DRP July 12, 2018 521 Los Palmos Drive configured as the subject property at the front – one story over the garage level, with pitched false front roofs with side facing gable dormer windows or bay window forms. Buildings immediately across Los Palmos Drive are typically a story taller. Residences at 501 and 527 Los Palmos have vertical additions at the rear. Immediately adjacent parcels are zoned RH-1 (Residential–House, One Family) or RH-1(D) (Residential–House, One Family, Detached).

BUILDING PERMIT NOTIFICATION

DR HEARING DATE FILING TO REQUIRED NOTIFICATION DR FILE TYPE HEARING PERIOD DATES DATE TIME

April 26, 2017 – May 26, 311 Notice 30 days July 12, 2018 412 days* May 26 , 2017 2017

HEARING NOTIFICATION REQUIRED REQUIRED ACTUAL ACTUAL TYPE PERIOD NOTICE DATE NOTICE DATE PERIOD Posted Notice 10 days July 2, 2018 July 2, 2018 10 days Mailed Notice 10 days July 2, 2018 July 2, 2018 10 days

PUBLIC COMMENT

SUPPORT OPPOSED NO POSITION

Adjacent Neighbor X (DR) Other neighbors on the block or directly across the X street Neighborhood groups X

*A new architect was engaged after the DR request.

The Department has not received any public comment pertaining to the requested Discretionary Review of the proposed project (as of the publication date of this packet).

DR REQUESTOR Margaret Murray, 517 Los Palmos Drive, San Francisco, CA 94127. Adjacent neighbor.

DR REQUESTOR’S CONCERNS AND PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES See attached Discretionary Review Application, dated May 26, 2017.

2 Executive Summary CASE NO. 2016-008165DRP July 12, 2018 521 Los Palmos Drive

PROJECT SPONSOR’S RESPONSE TO DR APPLICATION See attached Response to Discretionary Review, submitted June 26, 2018.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

The Department has determined that the proposed project is exempt/excluded from environmental review, pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15301 (Class One - Minor Alteration of Existing Facility, (e)). Additions to existing structures provided that the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 square feet).

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN TEAM REVIEW

The Residential Design Advisory Team (RDAT) and Senior Managers/Design Review staff at a Project Coordination meeting reviewed the original project and subsequent modifications with the following comments:

 The proposed third floor construction at the rear should be limited to the existing rear wall of the second floor.  The proposed dining room at the rear of the second floor is acceptable. The western wall should have a minimum 5’-0” side setback from the property line, which should match with the alignment of the wall on the first floor. The eastern wall of the dining room should have a 5’-0” minimum side setback from the property line to the east.  Any decking at the third floor level should be held back to the line of the master bedroom wall.

The Project Sponsor amended the plans to address the above comments. As currently proposed, the Department can support the project and provide a recommendation to the Commission to not take DR and approve the project as proposed.

Under the Commission’s pending DR Reform Legislation, this project would not be referred to the Commission as this project does not contain or create any exceptional or extraordinary circumstances.

RECOMMENDATION: Do not take DR and approve project as proposed

Attachments: Block Book Map Sanborn Map Zoning District Map Aerial Photographs Context Photographs Section 311 Notice CEQA Determination DR Application Response to DR Application Reduced Plans

3 Block Book Map

DR REQUESTOR

SUBJECT PROPERTY

Discretionary Review Hearing July 12, 2018 Case Number 2016-008165DRP 521 Los Palmos Drive Block 3054 Lot 068 Sanborn Map*

SUBJECT PROPERTY

DR REQUESTOR

*The Sanborn Maps in San Francisco have not been updated since 1998, and this map may not accurately reflect existing conditions.

Discretionary Review Hearing July 12, 2018 Case Number 2016-008165DRP 521 Los Palmos Drive Block 3054 Lot 068 Zoning Map

Discretionary Review Hearing July 12, 2018 Case Number 2016-008165DRP 521 Los Palmos Drive Block 3054 Lot 068 Aerial Photo

DR REQUESTOR – SUBJECT PROPERTY 517 Los Palmos Drive

Discretionary Review Hearing July 12, 2018 Case Number 2016-008165DRP 521 Los Palmos Drive Block 3054 Lot 068 Site Photo

SUBJECT PROPERTY DR REQUESTOR

Discretionary Review Hearing July 12, 2018 Case Number 2016-008165DRP 521 Los Palmos Drive Block 3054 Lot 068 Site Photo - rear

Discretionary Review Hearing July 12, 2018 Case Number 2016-008165DRP 521 Los Palmos Drive Block 3054 Lot 068 1650 Mission Street Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 NOTICE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (SECTION 311)

On May 27, 2016, the Applicant named below filed Building Permit Application No. 2016.05.27.8675 with the City and County of San Francisco.

PROJECT INFORMATION APPLICANT INFORMATIO N Project Address: 521 Los Palmos Drive Applicant: Frank and Stephanie Chan Cross Street(s): Bella Vista Address: 521 Los Palmos Drive Block/Lot No.: 3054/068 City, State: San Francisco, CA 94127 Zoning District(s): RH-1/40-X Telephone: (415) 606-9065 Record No.: 2016-008165PRJ Email: [email protected] You are receiving this notice as a property owner or resident within 150 feet of the proposed project. You are not required to take any action. For more information about the proposed project, or to express concerns about the project, please contact the Applicant listed above or the Planner named below as soon as possible. If you believe that there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances associated with the project, you may request the Planning Commission to use its discretionary powers to review this application at a public hearing. Applications requesting a Discretionary Review hearing must be filed during the 30-day review period, prior to the close of business on the Expiration Date shown below, or the next business day if that date is on a week-end or a legal holiday. If no Requests for Discretionary Review are filed, this project will be approved by the Planning Department after the Expiration Date. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Commission or the Department. All written or oral communications, including submitted personal contact information, may be made available to the public for inspection and copying upon request and may appear on the Department’s website or in other public documents.

PROJECT SCOPE  Demolition  New Construction  Alteration  Change of Use  Façade Alteration(s)  Front Addition  Rear Addition  Side Addition  Vertical Addition PROJE CT FEATURES EXISTING PROPOSED Building Use One Family Dwelling No Change Front Setback No front Yard Setback No Change Side Setbacks No side yard setback No Change Building Depth +/- 61 feet No Change Rear Yard +/- 36 feet No Change Building Height +/- 14 feet +/- 20 feet Number of Stories 2 3 Number of Dwelling Units 1 No Change Number of Parking Spaces 1 vehicle 1 vehicle space to remain and 1 bicycle space PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is to replace and remodel the existing sunroom and remodel kitchen, add upper rear master suite bedroom and bathroom vertically. No changes will be taking place to the front façade and lower floors. See attached plans.

The issuance of the building permit by the Department of Building Inspection or the Planning Commission project approval at a discretionary review hearing would constitute as the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

For more information, please contact Planning Department staff:

Planner: Todd Kennedy Telephone: (415) 575-9125 Notice Date: E-mail: [email protected] Expiration Date:

中文詢問請電: 415.575.9010 | Para Información en Español Llamar al: 415.575.9010 | Para sa Impormasyon sa Tagalog Tumawag sa: 415.575.9121

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT PROCEDURES Reduced copies of the proposed project plans have been included in this mailing for your information. If you have questions about the plans, please contact the project Applicant listed on the front of this notice. You may wish to discuss the plans with your neighbors or neighborhood association, as they may already be aware of the project. If you have general questions about the Planning Department’s review process, please contact the Planning Information Center at 1660 Mission Street, 1st Floor (415/ 558-6377) between 8:00am - 5:00pm Monday-Friday. If you have specific questions about the proposed project, you should contact the planner listed on the front of this notice. If you believe that the impact on you from the proposed project is significant and you wish to seek to change the project, there are several procedures you may use. We strongly urge that steps 1 and 2 be taken. 1. Request a meeting with the project Applicant to get more information and to explain the project's impact on you. 2. Contact the nonprofit organization Community Boards at (415) 920-3820, or online at www.communityboards.org for a facilitated discussion in a safe and collaborative environment. Community Boards acts as a neutral third party and has, on many occasions, helped reach mutually agreeable solutions. 3. Where you have attempted, through the use of the above steps or other means, to address potential problems without success, please contact the planner listed on the front of this notice to discuss your concerns. If, after exhausting the procedures outlined above, you still believe that exceptional and extraordinary circumstances exist, you have the option to request that the Planning Commission exercise its discretionary powers to review the project. These powers are reserved for use in exceptional and extraordinary circumstances for projects which generally conflict with the City's General Plan and the Priority Policies of the Planning Code; therefore the Commission exercises its discretion with utmost restraint. This procedure is called Discretionary Review. If you believe the project warrants Discretionary Review by the Planning Commission, you must file a Discretionary Review application prior to the Expiration Date shown on the front of this notice. Discretionary Review applications are available at the Planning Information Center (PIC), 1660 Mission Street, 1st Floor, or online at www.sfplanning.org). You must submit the application in person at the Planning Information Center (PIC) between 8:00am - 5:00pm Monday-Friday, with all required materials and a check payable to the Planning Department. To determine the fee for a Discretionary Review, please refer to the Planning Department Fee Schedule available at www.sfplanning.org. If the project includes multiple building permits, i.e. demolition and new construction, a separate request for Discretionary Review must be submitted, with all required materials and fee, for each permit that you feel will have an impact on you. Incomplete applications will not be accepted. If no Discretionary Review Applications have been filed within the Notification Period, the Planning Department will approve the application and forward it to the Department of Building Inspection for its review. BOARD OF APPEALS An appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision on a Discretionary Review case may be made to the Board of Appeals within 15 calendar days after the building permit is issued (or denied) by the Department of Building Inspection. Appeals must be submitted in person at the Board's office at 1650 Mission Street, 3rd Floor, Room 304. For further information about appeals to the Board of Appeals, including current fees, contact the Board of Appeals at (415) 575-6880. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This project has undergone preliminary review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If, as part of this process, the Department’s Environmental Review Officer has deemed this project to be exempt from further environmental review, an exemption determination has been prepared and can be obtained through the Exemption Map, on-line, at www.sfplanning.org. An appeal of the decision to exempt the proposed project from CEQA may be made to the Board of Supervisors within 30 calendar days after the project approval action identified on the determination. The procedures for filing an appeal of an exemption determination are available from the Clerk of the Board at City Hall, Room 244, or by calling (415) 554-5184. Under CEQA, in a later court challenge, a litigant may be limited to raising only those issues previously raised at a hearing on the project or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission, Planning Department or other City board, commission or department at, or prior to, such hearing, or as part of the appeal hearing process on the CEQA decision. ~~¢~a couNryo~ m W '.'~~ x SAN FRANCISCO Nw ~" b PLANNING DEPARTMENT O~`3S,• O'~`~~ CEQA Categorical Exemption Determination PROPERTY INFORMATIONIPROJECT bESCRIPTION

Project Address Block/Lot(s)

521 Los Palmos Drive 3054/068 Case No. Permit No. Plans Dated 2016-008165PRJ 201605278675 10/30/15 Q✓ Addition/ ❑Demolition ❑New Project Modification Alteration (requires HRER if over 45 years old) Construction (GO TO STEP 7) Project description for Planning Deparhnent approval. VERTICAL ADDITION. REMODEL &REPLACE EXISTING SUNROOM. REMODEL KITCHEN.ADD UPPER REAR MASTER SUITE BEDROOM 8~ BATHROOM PENTHOUSE VERTICALLY. NO CHANGES TO EXISTING FRONT OR LOWER FLOORS.

STEP 1: EXEMPTION CLASS TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER

*Note: If neither class applies, an Environmental Evaluation Application is required.* Class 1 —Existing Facilities. Interior and exterior alterations; additions under 10,000 sq. ft.

Class 3 —New Construction/ Conversion of Small Structures. Up to three (3) new single-family residences or six (6) dwelling units in one building; commercial/office structures; utility extensions.; .; change of use under 10,000 sq. ft. if principally permitted or with a CU. Change of use under 10,000 s . ft. if rind all ermitted or with a CU. ❑ Class_

STEP 2: CEQA IMPACTS TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER If any box is checked below, an Environmental Evaluation Application is required. Air Quality: Would the project add new sensitive receptors (specifically, schools, day care facilities, hospitals, residential dwellings, and senior-care facilities) within an Air Pollution Exposure Zone? Does the project have the potential to emit substantial pollutant concentrations (e.g., backup diesel generators, heavy industry, diesel trucks)? Exceptions: do not check box if the applicant presents documentation of enrollment in the San Francisco Department ofPublic Health(DPH) Article 38 program and the project would not have the potential to emit substantial pollutant concentrations. (refer to EP _ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Air Pollutant Exposure Zone) Hazardous Materials: If the project site is located on the Maher map or is suspected of containing hazardous materials (based on a previous use such as gas station, auto repair, dry cleaners, or heavy manufacturing, or a site with underground storage tanks): Would the project involve 50 cubic yards or more of soil disturbance - or a change of use from industrial to residential? If yes, this box must be checked and the project applicant must submit an Environmental Application with a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Exceptions: do not check box if the applicant presents documentation of enrollment in the San Francisco D artment o Public Health(DPH) Maher ro ram, a DPH waiver om the

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPAFiTMEIYT ~}Z~1'~ oA'~: 415.575.9010 R2vised~ 4'1116 Para informacibn en Espar~ol Ilamar al: 415.575.9010 Para sa impormasyon sa Tagalog tumawag sa: 415.575.9121 Maher program, or other documentation from Environmental Planning staff that hazardous material effects would be less than significant (refer to EP ArcMap > Maher layer). Transportation: Does the project create six (6) or more net new parking spaces or residential units? Does the project have the potential to adversely affect transit, pedestrian and/or bicycle safety (hazards) or the adequacy of nearby transit, pedestrian and/or bicycle facilities? Archeological Resources: Would the project result in soil disturbance/modification greater than two (2)feet below grade in an archeological sensitive area or eight(8) feet in anon-archeological sensitive area? (refer to EP ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Archeological Sensitive Area) Subdivision/Lot Line Adjustment: Does the project site involve a subdivision or lot line adjustment on a lot with a slope average of 20°/o or more? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Topography)

Slope = or> 20%: Does the project involve any of the following:(1) square footage expansion greater ❑ than 1,000 sq. ft. outside of the existing building footprint,(2) excavation of 50 cubic yards or more of soil,(3) new construction? (refer to EP ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Topography) If box is checked, a geotechnical report is required.

Seismic: Landslide Zone: Does the project involve any of the following:(1) square footage expansion ❑ greater than 1,000 sq. ft. outside of the existing building footprint,(2) excavation of 50 cubic yards or more of soil,(3) new construction? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Seismic Hazard Zones) If box is checked, a geotechnical report is required. Seismic: Liquefaction Zone: Does the project involve any of the following:(1) square footage ❑ expansion greater than 1,000 sq. ft. outside of the existing building footprint,(2) excavation of 50 cubic yards or more of soil,(3) new construction? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Seismic Hazard Zones) If box is checked, a geotechnical report will likely be required. If no boxes are checked above, GO TO STEP 3. If one or more boxes are checked above, an Environmental Evaluation Application is required, unless reviewed by an Environmental Planner. Project can proceed with categorical exemption review. The project does not trigger any of the CEQA impacts listed above. Comments and Planner Signature (optional):

STEP 3: PROPERTY STATUS —HISTORIC RESOURCE TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER PROPERTY IS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:(re r to Parcel In ormation Ma ) Category A: Known Historical Resource. GO TO STEP 5. ✓ Category B:Potential Historical Resource (over 45 ears of age). GO TO STEP 4. Category C: Not a Historical Resource or Not Age Eligible (under 45 years of age). GO TO STEP 6.

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT Revise: 411111 C~ STEP 4: PROPOSED WORK CHECKLIST TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER

Check all that apply to the project. 1. Change of use and new construction. Tenant improvements not included. 2. Regular maintenance or repair to correct or repair deterioration, decay, or damage to building. ❑ 3. Window replacement that meets the Departments Window Replacement Standards. Does not include storefront window alterations. ❑ 4. Garage work. A new opening that meets the Guidelinesfor Adding Garages and Curb Cuts, and/or replacement of a ~ara~e door in an existine openine that meets the Residential Design Guidelines. ~ U ~ 5. Deck, terrace construction, or fences not visible from any immediately adjacent public right-of-way. ~ ❑ 16. Mechanical equipment installation that is not visible from any immediately adjacent public right-of-

7. Dormer installation that meets the requirements for exemption from public notification under Zoning ❑ 1 Administrator Bulletin No. 3: Dormer Windows. 8. Additions) that are not visible from any immediately adjacent public right-of-way for 150 feet in each ❑ direction; does not extend vertically beyond the floor level of the top story of the structure or is only a single story in height; does not have a footprint that is more than 50%larger than that of the original building; and does not cause the removal of architectural significant roofing features. Note: Project Planner must check box below before proceeding. U Project is not listed. GO TO STEP 5. Project does not conform to the scopes of work. GO TO STEP 5. n Project involves four or more work descriptions. GO TO STEP 5. LU~roject involves less than four work descriptions. GO TO STEP 6.

STEP 5: CEQA IMPACTS -ADVANCED HISTORICAL REVIEW TO BE COMPLETED BY PRESERVATION PLANNER

Check all that apply to the project. 1. Project involves a known historical resource(CEQA Category A)as determined by Step 3 and conforms entirely to proposed work checklist in Step 4. 2. Interior alterations to publicly accessible spaces. ❑ 3. Window replacement of original/historic windows that are not "in-kind" but are consistent with existing historic character. 4. Facade/storefront alterations that do not remove, alter, or obscure character-defining features. 5. Raising the building in a manner that does not remove, alter, or obscure character-defining features.

6. Restoration based upon documented evidence of a building's historic condition, such as historic photographs, plans, physical evidence, or similar buildings. 7. Addition(s), including mechanical equipment that are minimally visible from a public right-of-way and meet the Secretan~ of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.

8. Other work consistent with the Secretan~ of the Interior Standardsfor the Treatment of Historic Properties ❑ (specify or add comments):

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT Revised: 4/11?1 ~i 9. Other work that would not materially impair a historic district (specify or add comments):

(Requires approval b~ Senior Preservation Planner/Preservation Coordinator) 10. Reclassification of property status.(Requires approval b~ Senior Preservation Planner/Preservation Coordinator) ❑ Reclassify to Category A ❑Reclassify to Category C a. Per HRER dated: (attach HRER) b. Other (specific):

Note: If ANY box in STEP 5 above is checked, a Preservation Planner MUST check one box below. ❑ Further environmental review required. Based on the information provided, the project requires an Environmental Evaluation Application to be submitted. GO TO STEP 6. a Project can proceed with categorical exemption review. The project has been reviewed by the Preservation Planner and can proceed with categorical exemption review. GO TO STEP 6. Comments(optional):

Preservation Planner Signature:

STEP 6: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DETERMINATION TO BE COMPLETED BY PROTECT PLANNER Further environmental review required. Proposed project does not meet scopes of work in either (check all that apply): Step 2 — CEQA Impacts ❑ Step 5 —Advanced Historical Review STOP! Must file an Environmental Evaluation Application.

No further environmental review is required. The project is categorically exempt under CEQA. Planner Name: E. JOCICI(Il@@C Signature: Digitally signed by Elizabeth Project Approval Action: E IIZ~IJe l~ - I ~Nf do=og dcesfgov, dc=cityplanning, Buildin Permit ~O~~O~ ou=CityPlanning,ou=Current g Planning, cn=Elizabeth Gordon Jonckheer, email=Elizabeth.Gordon- If Discretionary Review before the Planning Commission is requested, [email protected] the Discretionary Review hearing is the Approval Action for the J o nc k he e r Date: 2017.03.30 1122:46 project -07'00'

Qnce signed or stamped and dated, this document constitutes a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and Chapter 31 of the Administrative Code. In accordance with Chapter 31 of the San Francisco Administrative Code, an appeal of an exemption determination can only be filed within 30 days of the project receiving the first approval action.

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT RBVlSecl: 4;'11"f 6 STEP 7: MODIFICATION OF A CEQA EXEMPT PROJECT TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER In accordance with Chapter 31 of the San Francisco Administrative Code, when a California Envirorunental Quality Act(CEQA) exempt project changes after the Approval Action and requires a subsequent approval, the Environmental Review Officer (or his or her designee) must determine whether the proposed change constitutes a substantial modification of that project. This checklist shall be used to determine whether the proposed changes to the approved project would constitute a "substantial.modification" and, therefore, be subject to additional environmental review pursuant to CEQA. PROPERTY INFORMATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Project Address (If different than front page) Block/Lot(s)(If different than front page)

Case No. Previous Building Permit No. New Building Permit No.

Plans Dated Previous Approval Action New Approval Action

Modified Project Description:

DETERMINATION IF PROJECT CONSTITUTES SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION Compared to the approved project, would the modified project: ❑ Result in expansion of the building envelope, as defined in the Planning Code; ❑ Result in the change of use that would require public notice under Planning Code Sections 311 or 312;

❑ Result in demolition as defined under Planning Code Section 317 or 19005(fl? Is any information being presented that was not known and could not have been known ❑ at the time of the original determination, that shows the originally approved project may no longer qualify for the exemption? If at least one of the above boxes is checked, further environmental review is required.yATEX FOR14

DETERMINATION OF NO SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION The proposed modification would not result in any of the above changes. If this box is checked, the proposed modifications are categorically exempt under CEQA,in accordance with prior project approval and no additional environmental review is required. This determination shall be posted on the Planning Departrnent website and office and mailed to the applicant, City approving entities, and anyone requesting written notice. Planner Name: Signature or Stamp:

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Revised. 4f17118 J f w ~ .- f

CASE NUMBER: ,~ ~fi ti_.4 uMy ~OI'V/` D~ J I ~ ~'✓ ~P

APPLICATION FOR a M~~' ~. F 2017 C6T'(~ COU~4TY ~~ ~.F. PLANfVING DEPARTMEi1T 1. ~wr~erlA~plicant Information P IC

DR APPLICANT'S NAME

DR APPt#2fANT'S ADDRESS: ZIP CODE. TELEPHONE i SIB- ~~ ~al~s !R~+ia~- c9-ir~ SSS•5~o'

PROPERTY OWNER- WHO IS DOING THE PR0.IECT ON WHICH YOU ARE REQUESTING DISCRETIONARY REVIEW NAME: ~a~K & Si-ep~a~; c. CI~~h ~'~~ ADDRESS: ~ ZIP CODE ;TELEPHONE: ------06 ~o6.s- ~5_~'~.._.__~iOS_. ~a~~u~.og_ O~►Je,_- ~- sF __ i a~►z~- ~_~~~~~ 6

CONTACT FOR DR APPLICATION:

Same es Above L`~ ~ I ADDRESS: :ZIP CODE TELEPHONE:

2. Lac~tion and Classification

STREET ADDRESS OF PROJECT: ZIP CODE: ~ 52~ (SOS ~GI~M.oS ~t'dC Sa.,~ ~~ ~is~o . C~4 a4i z~

ASSESSORS BLOCK/LOT: ~ LOT DIMENSIONS: ~ LOT AREA (SD Fn: '~, ZONING DISTRICP HEIGHT/BULK 3o5y- I D(~ ~ ~z~•~x9a.s y~{o3 ~ , 'RH-1 loo-X ya •~

3. Project Description

Please check all that apply Change of Use Change of Hours ❑ New Construction Alterations, Demolition Other ❑

Additions to Building: Rear ~ Front ❑ Height eft Side Yard -SV ro0 M 0.~ S~ cA~n d K.~l[~ or Previous Use Z ~ 5~~ `'~ by ~ ~ et ~ w ~ ~ ✓1 Present _.- - - ~a"►nq 3 'S~'BW~ b~~ W i~r. c~IoSeG~ ' 1~~1 ~~"GInS1M ~ iV~ i Proposed Use: __ __- ~J ._ . _. _ ~ t.` S 2~ ~ b Building Permit Application No. ~ ~ ~ ~ • O S . ~ ~• g_ ~ ~ ~ Date Filed: _ I:N .~,..1

~.. 4. Actions Prior to a Discretionary Review Request

Prior Aclfon YES NO

Have you discussed this project with the permit applicant? ~ ❑

Did you discuss the project with the Planning Department permit review planner? ~ ❑ r Did you participate in outside mediation on this case?

5. Changes Made to the Project as a Result of Mediation If you have discussed the project with the applicant, planning staff or gone through mediation, please summarize the result, including any changes there were made to the proposed project.

t3 SAN FPANGISGO PLANNING OEPAFTMENT V.09.0].2012 h~ {~~k. ~ ~ 1j

CASE NUMBER: ~''~, re t Vct o~tty ~,

Discretionary Review Request

In the space below and on separate paper, if necessary, please present facts sufficient to answer each question.

1. What are the reasons for requesting Discretionary Review? The project meets the minimum standards of the Planning Code. What are the exceptional and extraordinary circumstances that justify Discretionary Review of the project? How does the project conflict with the City's General Plan or the Planning Code's Priority Policies or Residential Design Guidelines? Please be specific and site specific sections of the Residential Design Guidelines.

_ _ ._ _ Se ~ ~..~G~n MCu-~._ ~In~ . __ u ~ti.b a-S (d.S~+r art. '~--~- ~'t ~ 0. v~ e~ Ov - - __ ~},,,~,,

2. The Residential Design Guidelines assume some impacts to be reasonable and expected as part of construction. Please explain how this project would cause unreasonable impacts. If you believe your property, the property of others or the neighborhood would be adversely affected, please state who would be affected, and how:

______--- __ -- - - -_ -

3. What alternatives or changes to the proposed project, beyond the changes (if any) already made would respond to the exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and reduce the adverse effects noted above in question N1?

PJe.C~l~bors ~,e.sc,.ve- ~..~. r~~ -}~ tivu~txd- of __ Discretionary Review Application 527 Los Palmos Drive, San Francisco, CA 94127 May 25,2017

Attachment One

uestion 1•

The proposed addition of a 8.5-foot tall third story to the existing two-story building is out of scale with the height of the surrounding homes, which are two stories in height. See Residential Design Guidelines section IV, Building Scale and Form. The depth of the second level of the property already is out of scale to that of surrounding buildings (with the previous addition of an extended basement level, solarium, and massive deck). The proposed closing off of the existing solarium and extension of the closed space on the second floor would exacerbate the out-of-scale massing as compared to the surrounding homes.

In addition, the proposed 8.5-foot third story would negatively and unreasonably impact neighbors' privacy, light, and views of public open spaces, as follows.

Privac

The proposed 8.5-foot ta11 third-story addition includes large French doors and windows that would look straight down upon and intrude on the privacy of the homes of neighbors on the street below (Melrose Avenue). The proposed roof deck on the east side of the proposed addition would look into the bathroom of the living quarters of the house at 517 Los Palmos Drive. The proposed addition at the second story of an enclosed space with large picture window facing east would look directly into the living and dining rooms of 517 Los Palmos Drive.

See Residential Design Guidelines section III, Site Design,"Privacy."

Light

The proposed 8.5-foot third story addition would shade the light to the interiors of the adjoining attached properties and to adjoining gardens.

See Residential Design Guidelines section III, Site Design,"Light."

Views

The proposed 8.5-foot tall third story addition would obstruct views from the south (e.g., from Melrose Avenue)toward the public open spaces of Mount Davidson. It would obstruct views from the east toward the public open spaces of San Bruno Mountain and the Pacific Ocean. The Pacific proposed addition on the second floor also would obstruct views from the east toward the Ocean. See Residential Design Guidelines section III, Site Design,"Views."

uestion 2•

Please see response to Question 1, above.

uestion 3•

Unknown at this time. Affected neighbors on Los Palmos Drive and Melrose Avenue need additional time to consult with architectural and engineering experts and reserve the right to amend this Application. Applicant's Affidavit

Under penalty of perjury the following declarations are made: a: The undersigned is the owner or authorized agent of the owner of this property. b: The information presented is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. c: The other information or applications may be required. —• '~

Signature. ~KI~~ Date: _ S I Z$~` ~~--

Print name,and indicate whether owner, or authorized agent: Ow►~~ Owner /Authorized Agent (circle one)

'j ~1 SAN FPANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT V08.0].2012 ~~ ~ .. o ~_~~ ~" ~g F ~., _ ~~". __ _. ~' CASE NUMBER i''x...tnR lJsa aniP Discretionary Review ~4pplication Submittal Checklist

Applications submitted to the Planning Department must be accompanied by this checklist and a]] required materials. The checklist is to be completed and signed Uy the applicant or authorized agent.

._... .._.. ------...__._..__...... ------..._..---._.._...... _...... _._..._...._._...... _..._-~--~---~------~--...... __....._....._...._....._...... _...._...... _...... _..__r _.___ --~--....__---... REQUIRED MATERIALS (please check correct column) I DR APPLICATION i ~ Application, with all blanks completed ~ LI Address labels (original), if applicable Address labels (copy of the above), if applicable ; Q Photocopy of this completed application ~ [~ i r Photographs that illustrate your concerns Convenant or Deed Restrictions ~ Check payable to Planning Dept. [~.J~ Letter of authorization for agent lJl~ ~ ❑ Other: Section Plan, Detail drawings (i.e. windows, door entries, trim), Specifications (for cleaning, repair, etc.) and/or Product cut sheets far new ~~ '. elements (i.e. windows, doors) i _ ____ ------_..... _.._._._..__.....---___. _ _ ...... ~ ._.._ __ _._ ..__-= NOTES: ❑ Required Material. ~s Optional Material. 0 Two sets of original labels and one copy of addresses of adjacent property owners and owners of property across street.

For Department Use Only Application received by Planning Deparhnent:

By: _ Date:

Introduction

We are a family of five with three kids ages 6, 9, and 11, who are sharing a small bedroom, with our six year old daughter still in a toddler bed (due to space limitations) and our two boys are in a bunk bed. The three kids attend public schools in San Francisco, and I am also an educator for the school district. My wife works for a non-profit, and the both of us have dedicated our careers to helping others. We both grew up in the city and want our kids to have the same rich experience. Our family is in desperate need of space to accommodate to our growing kids, and due to our careers and salaries, and the escalating price of real estate, we just can’t afford a bigger home in San Francisco.

We have always been sensitive to our surrounding neighbors, so thus have gone to their homes to inform them of our plans, to which they were excited and supportive. Furthermore, we got the idea of the addition from our neighbor two houses to the right of us and four houses to the left, who share the same floor plans as us. This is a minimal project, and we have taken reasonable steps to be neighborly and accommodating. This process has created great frustration and further financial burden to our family. All we want is something reasonable and fair.

Attachment

Question 1

The project is in full compliance with guidelines set out by the city planning department and by the Residential Design Team. We held pre-application meeting, one-on-one meetings with surrounding neighbors, and had several personal communications with DR requester.

DR’s claims are overly exaggerated. The basement has been there for over 40 years and the solarium over 30 years. DR was aware of the basement and solarium when she purchased her home and willingly chose to proceed with her purchase. Further, our deck is about the same size in comparison to DR’s deck and smaller in comparison to other neighbors. There is nothing out of scale with our project as other neighbors already have what we are proposing.

As for privacy, we are proposing to fix a solarium that has been leaking and causing damages to our house for many years now. Closing the solarium with unobstructed views will provide more privacy to all. The proposed deck is 3 feet by 6 feet, so it is physically impossible to see into any windows.

Light – On the second floor proposed plans, we have revised it with a 5 feet setback from the shared property line.

Question 2

We have eliminated the proposed roof top deck, in addition to changing the proposed third floor deck with a smaller enclosed one.

Question 3

We have made many changes to our plans to work with DR. Moreover, I have personally reached out to her several times in attempts to work with her and explained to her of our hardship and need for the additional space. Our surrounding neighbors are in support of our project. We have three growing kids sharing a small room, and our careers and pay prohibit us from the possibility of buying a larger house. We love this city, and our kids love their neighbors and schools. This modest project is fully code compliant. For all the above reasons, we request that the planning commission decline the Discretionary Review and approve the proposed project. PROPOSED DWELLING GROSS FLOOR AREA FLOOR GROSS DWELLING PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CONDITIONED DWELLING PROPOSED ADDITION FLOOR THIRD PROPOSED BASEMENT EXISTING ENTRY EXISTING GARAGE EXISTING AREA FLOOR CONDITIONED DWELLING EXISTING FLOOR GROSS AREA DWELLING EXISTING USE ZONING DISTRICT NUMBER PARCEL ASSESSOR'S TYPE BUILDING GROUP OCCUPANCY ADDRESS

NTS ASSESSORS PARCELMAP ASSESSORS PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT PROJECT SITE PROJECT 521 LOS PALMOS DRIVE PALMOS LOS 521 MIRALOMA PARK MIRALOMA HIGHLANDS WESTWOOD 3054 NO. SHEET 3791 SQ. 3791 FT. SQ. 2881 FT. SQ. 2448 FT. SQ. 3358 FT. 470 SQ. FT. SQ. 470 FT. SQ. 544 FT. SQ. 303 63 SQ.FT. 63 3054-068 RH-1 V-B R-3

97.953 PL LIGHT WELL 523 LOS PALMOS DRIVE LOSPALMOS 523 ADJACENT BUILDING A9 A8 A7 A6 A5 A4 A3 A2 A1 THIRD STORY ADDITION & SECOND FLOOR REMODEL FLOOR SECOND & ADDITION STORY THIRD 25.192 3054 067 3054 25.230 PROPOSED SECTIONS PROPOSED SECTIONS EXISTING ELEVATIONS PROPOSED ELEVATIONS PROPOSED ELEVATIONS EXISTING ELEVATIONS EXISTING PLANS FLOOR PROPOSED FLOOR & EXISTING PLANS DEMO PLANS INFORMATION PROJECT & NOTES GENERAL APM, PLAN, SITE P L P L

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" SCALE: SITE PLAN SITE

98.250 PL

5'-1" 5'-0" LIGHT WELL SHEET SCHEDULE SHEET WORK OF SCOPE (N) DECK- THIRD FL. (N) ROOF- SECOND FLOOR (N) DECK- SECOND FLOOR (N) ROOF- THIRD FLOOR DRIVE WAY (E) ROOF- THIRD FL. LOS PALMOS DRIVE LOS PALMOS (E) DECK- FIRST FL. 24.424 25.492 P P L L DN.

5'-0" (N) ROOF ROOF 1ST. FL. 25'-0"REAR YARD SETBACK SECOND FL.

98.516 PL LIGHT WELL 8'-6" 517 LOS PALMOS DRIVE LOSPALMOS 517 ADJACENT BUILDING

34'-11" 6'-1" 069 3054 25.099 25.111 P L P L

98.699 PL enclosure. before framing floor inwall and used materials building of content moisture Check 10. foundations. ongrade at slab retarder vapor and capillary break 9. Install standards. emission formaldehyde low with comply shall systems finish interior in used plywood hardwood and (MDF) fiberboard density medium Particleboard, 8. 4.504.4. Section with comply shall flooring resilient receiving area floor of 80% Minimum 7. limits. VOC with compliant be shall systems carpet and Carpet 6. provided. be shall compliance of Verification compounds. toxic other and ROC for limits MIR weighted with product be compliant shall coating and paints 5. Aerosol limits. VOC with compliant be shall coatings other and stains Paints, 4. limits. compound toxic and other VOC with becompliant shall caulks and sealants 3. Adhesives, construction. during openings component airdistribution related and other duct openings 2. Cover rodents. of passage the wallsagainst exterior at conduits cables, electric pipes, around spaces annular 1. Protect and Plumbing Codes. and installed in conformance with current San Francisco Electrical, Mechanical design/build providedas be systemsshall plumbing and Electrical,mechanical 28. resistance. decay havenatural or treated eitherpressure be exposed shall wood All27. 26. HERS rater field verification is required for sealed duct system. battery operated. on every level. Carbon Monoxide detectors shall be 120V with battery backup or and room sleeping of each installedoutside to be Monoxidedetectors Carbon 25. battery backup. 120V with be shall detectors sleeping Smoke area. eachseparate givingaccess to 24. Smoke detectors to be installed in each sleeping room and in corridors or area required. varnish or as backprimed with paint beshall mouldings All exteriortrimand 23. bug screens. All windowstohave operable 22. inside without special knowledge or the use of a key. the from able shall open be security and openings be All exteriordoorsto 21. 407.2.1.2) psi (CPC 60 minute at gallons per 20. maximum The flow rate of residential lavatory shallfaucets exceednot 1.2 (CPC420.2.1) psi at 60 minute gallonsper 1.8 exceed 19. Faucets in kitchen, wet bars, laundry sinks, etc. shall have a water flow not to psi. at 80 minute gallonsper 2.0 flow of rate maximum have a showerhead shall and per flush gallons 1.28 more than no use shall Toilet 18. switches or motion sensors. eitherdimmer controlledby newly be shall otherinstalled luminaries All17. 16. Outdoor lighting shall be high efficacy or controlled by motion sensors. vacancy by sensor. a contolled be one luminaire least 15. Lighting in bathrooms, garages, laundry rooms, and utility rooms must have at Energy Building Standards. 2016 Efficiency of the 150.0-A with TABLE in accordance be efficacy high must installed luminaries All14. Standards. EnergyCommission California with current conformance in 0.32 U-value of maximum withN.F.R.C. a be certified doors shall All newwindowsand glazed 13. 54-2. No. Standard adjacent floor or enclosing a tub or shower shall comply with Part I of U.B. C. the 18" of allglazed within openings and panels Glass adjacent doors, 12. of the project. completion owner upon tothe surrendered be shall premises installedon fixtures and equipment for information and consumer warrantiesoperating manuals, All11. architect. the 10. Requests for change orders and substitutions shall be approved in advance by place. in is new construction of existing walls or adequate temporary lateral bracing shall be provided until all by prior toremoval supported newwalls be to allows forces followed which lateral be shall of construction sequence a building, the provide supportfor which lateral removedwalls are Where place. in all newsupportsare until removed support is which existing the for construction shoreall contractor adequately shall The 9. no additional cost. supervisionor at maintenance inadequate or construction or materials, installation faulty dueto all repairs make shall contractor from architect, notice formal receiptof Upon payment. final by evidenced completion as of date year from 8. The contractor shall furnish writtena guarantee all for work a for period ofone similar work. for details guided by be shall shown,construction is detail no Where otherwise. 7. Details marked "typical" shall apply in all similar cases unless specifically noted project. the occupancy and the release of liens on all material and at labor the completion of by legally constituted authorities. The contractor shall obtain a certificate of inspector. The contractor shall obtain and pay for all permits and licenses required 6. The contractor shall obtain inspection approval on all items in writing from the 5. All clarifications or required drawings shall be issued by the architect. 4. Dimensions shall always take precedence over scale. withwork. proceeding before architect the attention of tothe brought omissions or conflicts in the drawings, specifications or field conditions shall be 3. The contractor shall verify all dimensions and all conditions at the site. Any performed. workthe tobe affect they conditions as with existingthemselves the 2. All bidders shall visit the site of proposed the work and shall acquaint regulations. and ordinances state codes, and local applicable allother Energy and Code Code,California Francisco Mechanical PlumbingCode, San San Francisco Code, FranciscoElectrical Code, San BuildingSan Francisco 2016 the to requirementsof shall All work conform 1. 2016 GREEN BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS CODE BUILDING GREEN 2016 GENERAL NOTES GENERAL

HW 2 8/6

DN. 8 (E) NON-COMLIANT Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" = 1/4" Scale: PLAN FLOOR BASEMENT EXISTING WOOD STAIRS WOOD LANDING FAU A8 A8 1 1 (E) NON-CONFORMING 11" WOOD STAIRS WOOD CRAWL SPACE CRAWL DECK ABOVE UP FLOOR ABOVE

(E) CRAWL SPACE (E) CRAWL

/6 8 8" CRAWL SPACE CRAWL 6 UP 0 /2 0 DOOR? V.I.F. A8 A8 2 2 A8 3 A8 3

FLOOR ABOVE

/ 6 CH: 10'-6"

DN.

CH: 7'-4" 8 UP FLOOR ABOVE

2 LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE 2 / 6 6" Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" = 1/4" Scale: PLAN FLOOR FIRST EXISTING

7'-0" BELOW BEAM BELOW 7'-0" 8 50/40 BATHROOM HS 11'-5" x 8'-9" CH: 7'-4" SOFFIT ABOVE A8 A8 1 1 CH: 6'-10" CH: 7'-8" STUDY 6 HS 0 /4 CRAWL SPACE CRAWL 0 (E) NON-CONFORMING WOOD STAIRS,WOOD V.I.F. (E) WOOD DECK (E) WOOD 8" 19'-2" x 11'-11" GAME ROOM CL CH: 8'-1" (E) CANTILEVERED BAY & BEAM ABOVE (E) MEDIA ROOM HDR: 6'-8" B/I CH: 7'-7" 5 0 DN. /6 8 2" A8 A8 2 2 CH: 7'-8" CL.

2 6/ 6 8 A8 3

58'-0" A8 3 10'-2" 3'-2"

11'-8" x 9'-5" DINING ROOM 11'-8" x 10'-10" KITCHEN CH: 8'-0" 6" CH: 8'-0" Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" = 1/4" Scale: DEMO PLAN FLOOR SECOND 19'-6" x 18'-6" CH: 8'-10" GARAGE A8 A8 1 1

20'-10" x 9'-8" 50/70 SUNROOM CH: 8'-10"

15'-8" SH REF DEMO 9" T DN.

2 / 6 /

POWDER ROOM POWDER WD. 8 4'-8" x4'-8" 5'-0" CH: 7'-4" CH: 7'-4" 7.5" HALL CH: 8'-1" HALL NG LIVING ROOM LIVING 12'-1" x 19'-5"

50/66 CH: 8'-1"

HS W/D 6.5" EP 3" A8 A8 SUN DECK 2 2 5.5" UP 1" ENTRY CH: 8'-0" 5" HALL

3'-2" A8 3 A8 3 CLOSET

2 SH 6 /4 BATHROOM 2 8'-1" x8'-1" 5'-5" 4 6 CH: 8'-1" SH /2 12'-1" x 13'-3" BEDROOM 1 10 CH: 8'-1" Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" = 1/4" Scale: DEMO PLAN FLOOR THIRD A8 A8 1 1 (E) SUNROOM ROOF 2 SH 6 /4 CH: 8'-1" 2 4 DEMO DN. HALL 6 SH /2 10 (E) ROOF DEMO CLOSET 2 SH 6 /4 4 CLOSET 12'-1" x 13'-3" BEDROOM 2 CH: 8'-1" (E) DECK BELOW A8 A8 2 2 CLOSET 2 SH 6 /4 4 A8 3

58'-0"

12'-4"

3'-6" 8'-10" 19'-3" 6'-11" 19'-6"

010/40 9" SH 5'-1" 4 0 F /4 0 SCALE: = 1/4" SCALE: 1'-0" FLOOR SECOND PROPOSED (N) KITCHEN 010/40 SH GARAGE A9 A9 1 1

50/70 1" SH (N) DINING ROOM 9" (N) SUN DECK UP 6 15'-1" 0 /6

6 ROOM POWDER 8 HALL HALL LIVING ROOM LIVING 6.5" A9 A9 2 50/40 2 5.5" HS UP 4'-0" ENTRY 5" 5'-0" HALL 1ST. FLOOR ROOF BELOW A9 3 WALL SCHEDULE WALL HATCH WALL TYPE WALL HATCH EXISTING WALLS DEMO WALLS TO REMAIN NEW WALLS NEW A9 3 10'-9" 7'-4" (E) CLOSET (N) MASTER BATHROOM (N) WALK-IN (N) WALK-IN CLOSET 4'-2"

2 (E) BATHROOM SH 6 /4

(E) BEDROOM 1

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" SCALE: FLOOR THIRD PROPOSED 8

A9 8 A9 8

/6 1 /6 1

8 (N) 2ND FLOOR SUN DECK BELOW 8 2 SH 6 (N) DECK /4 10'-2" (N) HALL (E) HALL 4 (N) 2ND. FLOOR ROOF DN. 2 DN. 8/6 8 5 (E) CLOSET 0 25'-2" /6

8 2 8/6 8 STACKED (N) LAUNDRY ROOM (N) MASTER BEDROOM W/D 2 CHIMNEY SH 6 /4 (E) CLOSET 4 (E) BEDROOM 2 9'-0" A9 A9 2 2 (N) ROOF

26/40 (E) CLOSET

4 SH 2 HS 0 SH 6 /4 /4 5'-0" 0 1ST. FLOOR ROOF BELOW 4 14'-2" 7'-8" A9 3

SCALE: = 1/4" SCALE: 1'-0" ELEVATION REAR EXISITNG = 1/4" SCALE: 1'-0" ELEVATION FRONT EXISTING 523 LOSPALMOS DRIVE 517 LOSPALMOS DRIVE (E) ASPHALT SHINGLE 521 (E) ASPHALT SHINGLE (E) SIDING (E) STUCCO (E) SIDING 517 LOSPALMOS DRIVE 523 LOSPALMOS DRIVE

SCALE: = 1/4" SCALE: 1'-0" ELEVATION WEST EXISTING 11'-5" ROOF HEIGHT 523 LOSPALMOS DRIVE BLIND WALL (E) LIGHT WELL (E) SIDING (E) SUNROOM (E) SIDING (E) SIDING ROOF HEIGHT 11'-5"

(E) SIDING SCALE: = 1/4" SCALE: 1'-0" ELEVATION EAST EXISITNG 517 LOSPALMOS DRIVE BLIND WALL P L ROOF HEIGHT (E) ASPHALT SHINGLE F.F. ENTRY 19'-2" 0'-0"

SCALE: = 1/4" SCALE: 1'-0" ELEVATION REAR PROPOSED = 1/4" SCALE: 1'-0" ELEVATION FRONT PROPOSED 523 LOSPALMOS DRIVE 517 LOSPALMOS DRIVE (E) SIDING (E) ASPHALT SHINGLE (N) SUN DECK (N) SIDING (N) (N) WALL (N) WALL BEHIND (N) SUN DECK (N) SIDING (N) (E) SIDING 521 (E) ASPHALT SHINGLE (E) STUCCO (E) SIDING (N) SIDING (N) 517 LOSPALMOS DRIVE 523 LOSPALMOS DRIVE

Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" Scale: ELEVATION WEST (E) ASPHALT SHINGLE 19'-2" ROOF HEIGHT 0'-0" F.F. ENTRY P L (E) STUCCO 523 LOSPALMOS DRIVE 20'-10" ROOF HEIGHT BLIND WALL 19'-6" (N) SIDING (E) LIGHT WELL 6'-11" (E) (E) GARDEN WINDOW (N) DECK (N) SIDING 19'-3" (E) SIDING (N) SIDING (N) 34'-11" (N) SIDING 12'-4" (N) SIDING (E) SIDING (N) DECK (N) LIGHT WELL (N) ROOF HEIGHT 20'-10" LIGHT WELL LIGHT (E) NEIGHBOR'S (E) SIDING 6'-1"

Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" Scale: ELEVATION EAST 517 LOSPALMOS DRIVE BLIND WALL P L ROOF HEIGHT F.F. ENTRY 19'-2" 0'-0"

ADDITION FOR CHAN RESIDENCE a. gordon atkinson, aia 521 LOS PALMOS DRIVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. 94127 735a taraval street ~ san francisco, ca 94116 tel 415-731-9927 fax 415-731-9942 e-mail [email protected] s c a l e d a t e r e v i s e d drawn by s h e e t 1/23/2018 of AZ PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 4/30/2018 A7 5/18/2018 6/13/2018 F.F. FIRST FLOOR -6'-8" -16'-5" F.F. BASEMENT -8'-11" CEILING HT. -7'-4" F.F. DECK 11" CEILING HT. 3'-0" F.F. DECK 9'-8" CEILING HT. -16'-6" F.F. BASEMENT -6'-10" F.F. DECK 9'-8" FLOOR CEILING H.T.SECOND -11'-0" CEILING HT. BASEMENT CEILING HT.

7'-5 1/2" 8'-1" 7'-5 1/2" 8'-1" 8'-10" SUN DECK PLAYROOM/STORAGE PLAYROOM/STORAGE SOLARIUM STORAGE ROOM STORAGE ROOM

8'-0"

7'-7 1/2" 7'-4" DINING ROOM EQUIPMENT ROOM HALL BATHROOM LIVING ROOM LIVING MEDIA ROOM CRAWL SPACE CRAWL KITCHEN

6'-10" WALKWAY HALL HALL

15'-0"

8'-1" HALL

7'-4" CLOSET HALL HALL 2 1

8'-10" HALL SCALE: = 1/4" SCALE: 1'-0" = 1/4" SCALE: 1'-0" SECTION SECTION

8'-1" BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 2 ENTRY CEILING THIRD FLOOR HT. F.F. SECOND FLOOR F.F. SECOND FLOOR F.F. THIRD FLOOR F.F. THIRD FLOOR F.F. FIRST FLOOR F.F. FIRST FLOOR

ROOF HEIGHT ROOF HEIGHT F.F. CEILING HT.

F.F. ENTRY F.F. ENTRY

GARAGE 0'-0", VIF 0'-0", 17'-2" 17'-2" 18'-8" 18'-8" -7'-2" -6'-8"

9'-1" 9'-1" 1'-7" 1'-7" 0'-0" -11" 6" CEILING HT. F.F. SECOND FL. CEILING HT. 1'-7" 9'-8" 7'-2" F.F. FIRST FL.

8'-1" CLOSET CL. CRAWL SPACE CRAWL

7'-7 1/2" 15'-0" TOY STORAGE 3 STAIRWELL SCALE: = 1/4" SCALE: 1'-0" SECTION

8'-1" CRAWL SPACE CRAWL

WALKWAY 8'-1" BATHROOM

10'-6" F.F. THIRD FLOOR CEILING HT. CEILING HT. CEILING HT. F.F. ENTRY ROOF HT. 0'-0", VIF 0'-0", 3'-10" 7'-10" 17'-2" 18'-8" -6'-8" 9'-1" F.F.

ADDITION FOR CHAN RESIDENCE a. gordon atkinson, aia 521 LOS PALMOS DRIVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. 94127 735a taraval street ~ san francisco, ca 94116 tel 415-731-9927 fax 415-731-9942 e-mail [email protected] s c a l e d a t e r e v i s e d drawn by s h e e t 1/23/2018 of A8 4/30/2018 AZ EXISTING SECTIONS 5/18/2018 F.F. FIRST FLOOR (N) THIRD FLOOR F.F. FIRST FLOOR (N) THIRD FLOOR -6'-8" 11'-4" -6'-8" 11'-4" 9'-8" FLOOR CEILING H.T.SECOND -16'-6" F.F. BASEMENT -6'-10" F.F. DECK 9'-8" FLOOR CEILING H.T.SECOND -16'-6" F.F. BASEMENT -6'-10" F.F. DECK -11'-0" -11'-0" CEILING HT. BASEMENT CEILING HT. BASEMENT CEILING HT.

7'-10" 7'-10" PLAYROOM/STORAGE PLAYROOM/STORAGE STORAGE ROOM STORAGE ROOM 20'-10" ROOF HEIGHT 8'-2" 20'-10" ROOF HEIGHT (N) DINING ROOM (N) DINING ROOM

7'-7 1/2" 8'-0" 8'-0" EQUIPMENT ROOM HALL BATHROOM (N) MASTER BEDROOM (N) MASTER BEDROOM LIVING ROOM LIVING (N) KITCHEN MEDIA ROOM CRAWL SPACE CRAWL (N) LIGHT WELL WALKWAY HALL HALL CLOSET HALL HALL 2 1 HALL SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" SCALE: = 1'-0" 1/4" SCALE: SECTION SECTION

8'-1" 8'-1" BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 2 CEILING HT. THIRD FLOOR THIRD CEILING HT. FLOOR THIRD CEILING HT. F.F. SECOND FLOOR F.F. SECOND FLOOR F.F. THIRD FLOOR F.F. THIRD FLOOR F.F. FIRST FLOOR F.F. FIRST FLOOR

ROOF HEIGHT ROOF HEIGHT F.F.

F.F. ENTRY F.F. ENTRY

GARAGE 18'-8" 18'-8" 17'-2" 17'-2" -6'-8" -6'-8"

9'-1" 9'-1" 0'-0" 0'-0" 1'-7" 1'-7" -11" 6" CEILING HT. F.F. SECOND FL. CEILING HT. 7'-2" F.F. FIRST FL. 1'-7" 9'-8"

7'-7 1/2" 8'-0" CRAWL SPACE CRAWL MEDIA ROOM (N) MASTER BEDROOM LIVING ROOM LIVING 3 SCALE: = 1/4" SCALE: 1'-0" SECTION

6'-10" CRAWL SPACE CRAWL

OFFICE 8'-0" (N) KITCHEN (N) BATHROOM F.F. THIRD FLOOR CEILING HT. CEILING HT. CEILING HT. F.F. ENTRY ROOF HT. 0'-0", VIF 0'-0", 20'-10" 3'-10" 7'-10" 17'-2" -6'-8" 9'-1" F.F.