Grants Fund Annual Report 2017/18

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grants Fund Annual Report 2017/18 Grants Fund Annual Report 2017/18 For the period of April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018 Alberta Conservation Association – Grant Program Annual Report 2017/18 TABLE OF CONTENTS Grant Program 2017/18 Key Program Highlights 1 Executive Summary 1 Annual Report of Activities and Synopsis of Funding Recipient Projects 2 - 8 Introduction 2 The Funding Cycle 2 Funding Eligibility 3 Major Funding Goals and Priorities 2017/18 3 Proposal Review Process 5 Funding Allocations 5 Grant Project's Contribution to the ACA Funding Priorities 6 Synopsis of Approved Projects 7 ACA Grants Program Project Summaries 9 - 56 ACA Conservation, Community, and Education Grants 9 ACA Research Grants 46 APPENDIX: Projects in Relation to Grants ACA's Mission Funding Priorities 2017/18 57 - 61 ACA conserves, protects and enhances fish, wildlife ACA Conservation, Community, and Education Grants and habitat for Albertans to enjoy, value and use. Funding Priorities 57 ACA Research Grants Funding Priorities 60 ACA's Vision An Alberta with an abundance and diversity of fish, wildlife and their habitats, where future generations continue to use, enjoy and value our rich outdoor heritage. Alberta Conservation Association #101- 9 Chippewa Road Sherwood Park, AB, T8A 6J7 Front Cover Photo: Volunteers Dan Tulik and John Marple angling for Arctic grayling Amy MacKinven, Grants Program Administrator Photo: Paul Fitt Email: [email protected] Relating to the project: Conserving and Restoring Arctic Grayling in the VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT Upper Pembina River Watershed – Habitat Restoration Planning www.ab-conservation.com Northern Lights Fly Fishers/TUC Edmonton, 020-00-90-197 iii Executive Summary Grant Program Funded by the province’s hunters and anglers, ACA’s Grants Program supports annually a variety of projects both small and large which benefit Alberta’s wildlife and fish populations, as well 2017/18 as the habitat they depend on. Operational since 2002, the ACA Grants (formerly known as the Grant Eligible Conservation Fund or GECF), as of the 2017/18 funding round, has provided just under $16.7 million to 1,078 projects carried out in Alberta by the conservation community. Furthermore, the funding provided by the Grants continues to leverage approximately six times its value in conservation dollars, estimated at approximately $100 million— KEY PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS money that has been directly used for conservation work and more recently to support the recruitment and retention of hunters, for the Grants 2017/18: anglers, and trappers in Alberta. These popular grant programs received a record 174 applications The ACA Conservation, Community, and Education Grants received a (147 to Conservation, Community, and Education Grants and 27 record-breaking 147 funding applications requesting a total dollar value to the ACA Research Grants) requesting just over $2.7 million in just under $2.1 million. A total of $970,056 was allocated to 81 projects. 2017/18. A total of $1.3 million was allocated to 99 projects (81 Conservation, Community, and Education projects and 18 ACA The ACA Research Grants received 27 funding applications requesting Research Grants projects). The aim of this report is to document $610,513. A total of $329,990 was allocated to 18 projects. the procedures for 2017/18 and to provide an overview of activities and results of projects financially supported through the ACA Grants (the Conservation, Community, and Education Grants and Project budgets ranged from $800 to $44,000. the ACA Research Grants) in 2017/18. 1 Alberta Conservation Association – Grant Program Annual Report 2017/18 Annual Report of Activities and Synopsis of Funding Recipient Projects Introduction The Funding Cycle Alberta Conservation Association (ACA) believes it is our The funding priorities, guidelines, and application forms were responsibility to join and support the collective effort to conserve, made available to the public October 12, 2016 via the ACA website, protect, and enhance Alberta’s biological natural resources. One by email to existing contacts, and by environmental list servers. of the ways in which ACA does this is to make grants to other Details of the 2017/18 funding cycle are in the table below: members of the conservation community. The projects supported by ACA’s grants are intended to enhance and supplement ACA 2017/18 FUNDING CYCLE DATES activities, and aid in the delivery of ACA’s Vision, Mission, and Strategic Business Plan. ACA has been awarding conservation Posting of the Guidelines and Application Forms October 12, 2016 grants since 1997, with the GECF process starting in 2002/03. As on ACA’s website of the 2017/18 funding round, the Grants program has granted Window to receive completed ACA RG applications November 1, 2016 – approximately $16.7 million dollars since 2002/03 to 1,078 December 1, 2016 projects implemented in Alberta; these projects have leveraged an estimated $100 million in conservation work across the province. Window to receive completed CCEG applications January 1-25, 2017 After the project selection process, a total of $970,056 was granted to 81 ACA Conservation, Community, and Education Grants (CCEG) ACA RG adjudication meeting February 12, 2017 and $329,990 was granted to 18 ACA Research Grants (ACA RG) projects. This document provides an overview of the activities of CCEG adjudication meeting February 23, 2017 the CCEG and the ACA RG for the 2017/18 funding cycle. ACA Board approval and notification of applicants We have some impressive results and outreach coming from the as to funding status End of March 2017 ACA Grants supported projects in 2017/18: over 5,300 youth and Cooperative Project Agreements signed, initial novices participated in fishing, archery, hunting, and trapping payments made, and project work begins From April 1, 2017 activities across Alberta, approximately 11,000 youth and their families were involved in outdoor conservation activities, and Interim reports due and second payments made (if required) September 1, 2017 outreach activities educating Albertans about conservation- related issues is estimated as at least another 70,000 people. Final reports due March 15, 2018 Over 2,300 Albertans dedicated their time as mentors to take out youth and novice outdoorspeople. Three hundred and eleven Projects end and final payments made (if required) March 31, 2018 teachers and instructors were trained in various outdoor pursuits, taking programs such as Hunter Education or Fishing Education. At least 700 sites have been improved in collaboration with land owners and are now managed with more sustainable practices thereby improving riparian and ecologically sensitive areas. This year, about 660 bird or bat boxes were built and installed. Thousands of pounds of invasive species have been removed from sensitive areas. The ACA RG focused on various topics, including monitoring the status of Threatened species like sharp-tail grouse leks and Canada warbler breeding, and wildlife diseases threatening Alberta wildlife such as Chronic Wasting Disease in deer and White Nose Syndrome in bats. These are just a few examples, in the Projects Summaries section of this report, you can read about all the achievements of each of the projects that received funding in 2017/18. 2 Alberta Conservation Association – Grant Program Annual Report 2017/18 Funding Eligibility Major Funding Priorities The ACA Grants (CCEG and ACA RG) support a wide variety of Grants 2017/18 applicants and project types. Anyone with a suitable project This text is taken from Section C of the Project Submission working in Alberta can apply for funding, with the exception Guidelines for Funding 2017-2018. of ACA staff, Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP) staff, and individuals without the proper insurance. Certain project types Funding Priorities for the Conservation, Community and and budget items are not covered by the CCEG and the ACA RG, Education Grants for example land acquisition, emergency funding, or overhead All applicants to the ACA Conservation, Community and Education costs. Since fiscal year 2009/10, funding priorities have been used Grants should be aware that this grant is fully funded by the by the Grants to guide applicants in drafting their applications. The hunters and anglers of Alberta. All proposals should be able to funding priorities for both the CCEG and the ACA RG stayed the demonstrate how the proposed project will aid ACA in meeting same this year: the CCEG had the same seven funding priorities and its mission of conserving, protecting and enhancing fish, wildlife the ACA RG had the same 12 funding priorities as used in 2016/17. and habitat for all Albertans to enjoy, value and use. To help See "Major Funding Priorities Grants 2017/18" for the full list. These direct potential applicants the following list of priority areas has grants do accept applications that do not relate to the suggested been developed. While the ACA Conservation, Community and areas; however, projects that address one or more of these priority Education Grants will accept applications that do not relate to areas have a better chance of being funded than those that do these suggested areas, projects that address one or more of these not. The eligibility criteria and funding priorities can be found in priority areas will have a higher probability of being funded than full in the documents “Project Submission Guidelines for Funding those that do not. 2017/18: ACA Conservation, Community, and Education Grants” and “Project Submission Guidelines for Funding in 2017–2018: ACA 1. Habitat enhancement activities specifically listed on Research Grants” (these documents are available from the Grants provincial recovery plans for Alberta’s endangered species (to be done in cooperation with recovery teams). (See: Project Administrator). aep.alberta.ca/fish-wildlife/species-at-risk/species-at- The CCEG offers small grants for projects with budgets of $3,000 risk-publications-web-resources/default.aspx ) and under and large grants for projects with budgets over $3,000.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix H: Life Requisite Summary of Selected Terrestrial Vertebrates Within the Tolko Industries
    APPENDIX H Ref: H-065 Copyright © 2003 by Tolko High Level Lumber Division & Footner Forest Products Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Life Requisite Summary of Selected Terrestrial Vertebrates within the Tolko Industries Ltd (HLLD) FMA Area Prepared by Eco-West Environmental Services Ltd 1 Eco-West Environmental Services Ltd. A summary report compiled for Tolko Industries Ltd. (HLLD) Front page photo credits clockwise from top left: Bison (Kim Morton), Pileated Woodpecker (Dennis Eckford), and Grizzly Bear (Kim Morton). 2 Eco-West Environmental Services Ltd. Executive Summary Tolko Industries Ltd (HLLD) is currently in the process of compiling a summary document (the Detailed Forest Management Plan), outlining the operational plans for the next ten-year period. As Tolko Industries Ltd. (HLLD) intends to harvest timber over many years, the importance of a document outlining habitat needs of wildlife was deemed necessary by industry, government, and the general public. As all species can not be monitored concurrently, due to cost and logistical constraints, a group of selected species was chosen by Tolko Industries Ltd. (HLLD), government, and the author. These thirty-two species represent the habitat requirements of other species within the FMA area of Tolko Industries Ltd. (HLLD). By managing for this limited number of species, all available habitats can be managed and monitored in both a cost-effective and logistically sound manner. Species were also chosen based on several other criteria, including status, commercial importance, and public opinion. The information laid out herein includes all relevant, current knowledge for which future management goals may be based, as related to habitat needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Artificial-Reef Knowledge to Enhance the Ecological Function of Offshore Wind Turbine Foundations: Implications for Fish A
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Review Using Artificial-Reef Knowledge to Enhance the Ecological Function of Offshore Wind Turbine Foundations: Implications for Fish Abundance and Diversity Maria Glarou 1,2,* , Martina Zrust 1 and Jon C. Svendsen 1 1 DTU Aqua, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kemitorvet, Building 202, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark; [email protected] (M.Z.); [email protected] (J.C.S.) 2 Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 20 A (or F), 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +45-50174014 Received: 13 April 2020; Accepted: 5 May 2020; Published: 8 May 2020 Abstract: As the development of large-scale offshore wind farms (OWFs) amplifies due to technological progress and a growing demand for renewable energy,associated footprints on the seabed are becoming increasingly common within soft-bottom environments. A large part of the footprint is the scour protection, often consisting of rocks that are positioned on the seabed to prevent erosion. As such, scour protection may resemble a marine rocky reef and could have important ecosystem functions. While acknowledging that OWFs disrupt the marine environment, the aim of this systematic review was to examine the effects of scour protection on fish assemblages, relate them to the effects of designated artificial reefs (ARs) and, ultimately, reveal how future scour protection may be tailored to support abundance and diversity of marine species. The results revealed frequent increases in abundances of species associated with hard substrata after the establishment of artificial structures (i.e., both OWFs and ARs) in the marine environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Pond Management for Recreational Fishing
    MP360 Farm Pond Management for Recreational Fishing Fis ure / herie ult s C ac en u te q r A Cooperative Extension Program, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and U f County Governments in cooperation with the Arkansas n f i u v l e B Game and Fish Commission r e si n ty Pi of at Arkansas Farm Pond Management for Recreational Fishing Authors University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff Aquaculture and Fisheries Center Scott Jones Nathan Stone Anita M. Kelly George L. Selden Arkansas Game and Fish Commission Brett A. Timmons Jake K. Whisenhunt Mark Oliver Editing and Design Laura Goforth Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 The Pond Ecosystem .................................................................................................1 Pond Design and Construction Planning............................................................................................................................................2 Site Selection and Pond Design.......................................................................................................2 Construction…………………………………………………………………………… .............................3 Ponds for Watering Livestock..........................................................................................................3 Dam Maintenance ............................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Clupea Harengus)
    Cover images: Herring eggs in different developmental stages: shortly after fertilization in a petri dish (top), and advanced embryos attached to Zostera marina (right) and Fucus vesiculosus (bottom) on a natural spawning bed in the southern Baltic Sea. Effects of coastal habitat characteristics on the reproduction of Baltic herring (Clupea harengus) Dissertation with the aim of achieving a doctoral degree at the Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Natural Sciences Department of Biology Institute of Marine Ecosystem and Fishery Science University of Hamburg submitted by Lena von Nordheim 2019 in Hamburg Dissertation evaluation commission: Prof. Dr. Christian Möllmann, Institute of Marine Ecosystem and Fishery Science, University of Hamburg Dr. Patrick Polte, Thünen Institute of Baltic Sea Fisheries, Rostock Examination commission: Prof. PhD. Myron Peck (chair of commission), Institute of Marine Ecosystem and Fishery Science, University of Hamburg Prof. Dr. Christian Möllmann, Institute of Marine Ecosystem and Fishery Science, University of Hamburg Prof. Dr. Ralf Thiel, Department Ichthyology, Center of Natural History, University of Hamburg Dr. Patrick Polte, Thünen Institute of Baltic Sea Fisheries, Rostock Date of the oral defense: 05th December 2019 DISSERTATION EFFECTS OF COASTAL HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS ON THE REPRODUCTION OF BALTIC HERRING (Clupea harengus) CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG 5 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 9 MANUSCRIPT I - Influence of the macrophyte composition on spawning substrate selection behavior of spring spawning Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) in the Baltic Sea 31 MANUSCRIPT II - Developmental success of herring eggs spawned on different plant species 55 MANUSCRIPT III - Lethal effect of filamentous algal blooms on Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) eggs in the Baltic Sea 73 MANUSCRIPT IV - Impact of Spawning Substrate Complexity on Egg Survival of Atlantic Herring (Clupea harengus, L.) in the Baltic Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • NA Summer 2010 COVER 3.Indd
    VOLUME 40 | NUMBER 2 | SUMMER 2010 SUGGESTED RETAIL: $7.50 CDN Nature Alberta CELEBRATING OUR NATURAL HERITAGE PAUL TESSIER/COURTESY ONTARIO NATURE feature article Woodland Caribou in Jasper National Park NATURE ALBERTA Now, at last – TWO great opportunities in ONE: 1 Get Nature Alberta in full colour! 2 Help Reduce the use of paper! Switch your subscription from hard copy to the full colour e-version and get even GREATER Say YES I want the e-version! enjoyment of Nature Alberta while and within four weeks of receiving this issue, we will send you a complimentary full colour Nature Alberta REDUCING paper use. e-version of it. Say “Yes” – satisfaction guaranteed! This offer is available to both new and old subscribers. At this time, subscription rates remain the same. If you are not satisfi ed Phone today: (780) 427-8124; or with the e-version, you can simply switch back to hard copy. Email us: [email protected] or If you wish, you can get both hard copy and the full colour e-version for an extra $15 per year. [email protected] Nature Alberta: SUMMER 2010 1 Celebrating our natural heritage Nature Alberta is composed of natural history clubs from across the province. The aims of the Federation are: (a) To encourage among all Albertans, by all means possible, an increase in their knowledge of natural history and understanding of ecological processes; (b) To promote an increase in the exchange of information and views among natural history clubs and societies in Alberta; (c) To foster and assist in the formation of additional natural
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics and Reproductive Ecology of the Southern Calamary (Sepioteuthis Australis) in Tasmania
    FRDC FINAL REPORT POPULATION DYNAMICS AND REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN CALAMARY (SEPIOTEUTHIS AUSTRALIS) IN TASMANIA Natalie Moltschaniwskyj, Gretta Pecl, Jeremy Lyle, Malcolm Haddon, & Michael Steer June 2003 FRDC Project No. 2000/121 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Entry Moltschaniwskyj, Natalie Ann, 1965- Population dynamics and reproductive ecology of the southern calamary (Sepioteuthis australis) in Tasmania. ISBN 1 86295 104 7 1. Squid fisheries - Tasmania. 2. Squids - Reproduction - Tasmania. I. Moltschaniwskyj, N. II. Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute. 639.485809946 Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, Tasmania 7001. E-mail: [email protected]. Ph. (03) 6227 7277 Fax (03) 6227 8035 The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author/s and are not necessarily those of the Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute. Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania 2003. Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute. Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 List of Figures 4 List of Tables 9 Non-Technical Summary 12 Acknowledgements 16 Background 17 Need 18 Objectives 19 General Introduction 20 Chapter 1: Small-scale spatial and temporal patterns of egg production by the temperate loliginid squid Sepioteuthis
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Lake Sturgeon Spawning Activities at Xxxxxxxxxxxxx on the St
    Investigation of Lake Sturgeon Spawning Activities at Xxxxxxxxxxxxx on the St. Lawrence River in 2008 Final Report Modified to remove location reference Prepared for: New York Power Authority 123 Main St. White Plains, NY 10601 By: Environnement Illimité inc. 1453 Saint Timothée Montréal, Québec H2L 3N7 February 2009 Citation: Environnement Illimité inc. 2009. Investigation of Lake Sturgeon Spawning Activities at Xxxxxxxxxxxxx on the St. Lawrence River in 2008 — Final Report . Prepared for the New York Power Authority, 123 Main St. White Plains, NY 10601. 33 pages and 4 appendices. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Objectives ...............................................................................................................................2 1.3 Study Area ..............................................................................................................................2 2 METHODS ............................................................................................................................4 2.1 Spawner Observations through Video Monitoring .................................................................4 2.2 Characterization of the Spawning Beds ..................................................................................6 2.2.1 Depth and
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Management of Pacific Herring in the Salish Sea: Conserving and Recovering a Culturally Significant and Ecologic
    Assessment and Management of Pacific Herring in the Salish Sea: Conserving and Recovering a Culturally Significant and Ecologically Critical Component of the Food Web Prepared for: The SeaDoc Society Submitted by: The Salish Sea Pacific Herring Assessment and Management Strategy Team FINAL REPORT For award number 201701956-01 issued to Co-PIs Tessa Francis and Dayv Lowry August 2018 Members of the Salish Sea Pacific Herring Assessment and Management Strategy Team: Principle Investigator Tessa Francis, Puget Sound Institute, University of Washington, Tacoma Principle Investigator Dayv Lowry, Marine Fish Science Unit, WDFW, Olympia Todd Sandell, Marine Fish Science Unit, Forage Fish, WDFW, Mill Creek Kelly Biedenweg, Oregon State University, Corvallis Evelyn Brown, Lummi Indian Tribe Jaclyn Cleary, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Phill Dionne, Marine Fish Science Unit, Forage Fish, WDFW, Olympia Timothy Essington, University of Washington, Seattle Correigh Greene, Northwest Fishery Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Lorenz Hauser, University of Washington, Seattle Doug Hay, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, retired Paul Hershberger, United States Geological Survey, Marrowstone Marine Field Station Anna Kagley, Northwest Fishery Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Tim Kulchyski, Cowichan Tribes Paul McCollum, Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe Chad Ormond, Q’ul-lhanumutsun AQuatic Resources Society Manuscript may be cited as: The Salish Sea Pacific Herring Assessment and Management Strategy Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Size and Age at Maturity of Columbia River Upriver Bright Fall Chinook Salmon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Roy E. Beaty for the degree of Master of Science in Fisheries Science presented on February 18, 1992. Title: Changes in Size and Age at Maturity of Columbia River Upriver Bright Fall Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): Implications for Stock Fitness, Commercial Value, and Management Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: James D. Hall Redacted for Privacy IbliamJ. Liss The average size and age of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) caught in commercial fisheries along the Pacific Coast of North America have decreased substantially in this century. These declines might be caused in part by changes in size and age at maturity within the stocks contributing to those fisheries. Upriver Brights (Brights), a stock of fall chinook salmon in the Columbia River, are one of those stocks. The purposes of this study were to (1) determine if average size and age at maturity of Brights have declined, (2) gain a better understanding of the factors that may contribute to such declines, and (3) describe potential consequences of these changes. Data from in-river fisheries suggest that the average weight of mature Brights returning to the Columbia River has decreased approximately 2.7 kg since the 1910s, an average rate of about 0.1 lb'yr-1 (45 g'yr-1). Most of the potential biases in these data tend to make this estimate conservative. Insufficient data were available to describe changes in average age at maturity. There are many potential causes for the decline in average size of mature Brights, including factors that affect very early life stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Bats (Chiroptera) in 2013 Banff National Park Alberta, Canada
    Status of Bats (Chiroptera) in 2013 Banff National Park Alberta, Canada Myotis lucifugus photo G. Horne Contract Number BFU2013-1082 Prepared by Greg Horne for Jesse Whittington, Carnivore Specialist for Banff National Park March 31, 2013 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 1! 2.0 Basic Bat Biology and Life Cycle ............................................................................... 1! 2.1 Biology ...................................................................................................................... 2! 2.2 Bat Life Cycle ........................................................................................................... 2! 3.0 Bats Species in Alberta ............................................................................................... 3! 4.0 Federal and Provincial Status of Bats that occur in Banff National Park ............ 4! 4.1 Alberta Status ............................................................................................................ 4! 4.2 Federal Status ............................................................................................................ 6! 4.2.1 Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) ....... 6! 4.2.2 Species at Risk Act (SARA) .............................................................................. 7! 4.2.2.1 Species Listing Process Under SARA ............................................................ 7! 5.0 Threats
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-18 English.Pdf
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017 -2018 ICAR-DIRECTORATE OF COLDWATER FISHERIES RESEARCH Bhimtal - 263 136, Nainital Uttarakhand, India Citation: ICAR-DCFR Annual Report 2017-2018, ICAR-Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research, Bhimtal - 263136, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India Front cover: Theme: Species diversification in coldwater fisheries and aquaculture Back cover: Theme: Enhancing fish farmers income in the coldwater states of India Editors Dr. Deepjyoti Baruah Dr. M.S. Akhtar Dr. (Mrs.) Khangembam Victoria Chanu Dr. (Mrs.) Ciji Alexander Mr. Kishor Kunal Cover design Dr. Deepjyoti Baruah & Mr. Kishor Kunal Published by Dr. Debajit Sarma Director, ICAR-DCFR, Bhimtal ICAR-DCFR Annual Report is not a priced publication. Recipients of complimentary copies are not permitted to sell photocopies of the report in part or in full. This report includes unprocessed or semi-processed data which would form the basis of scientific papers in due course. The material contained in the form of reports and photographs, therefore, may not be used without the permission of this institute, except for quoting it as scientific reference. Layout design & Printed at M/s Royal Offset Printers, A-89/1, Naraina Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi 110028. Mobile: +91 9811622258 ii ICAR-DCFR ANNUAL REPORT 2017-18 Preface Coldwater fisheries have a great potential in generating rural income and providing food security to the rurals in Indian uplands and its sustainable utilization and development have assumed importance in coldwater regions of the country. The ICAR-Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research, Bhimtal has been continuously providing empirical inputs through imparting quality research and services for sustainable coldwater fisheries production, management and conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Lands Advocate
    Wild Lands Advocate The Alberta Wilderness Association Journal April 2004 • Vol.12, No. 2 http://AlbertaWilderness.ca [email protected] LOGGING CONFLICT RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT ALBERTA’S LAND POLICIES Andy Marshall A successful court battle against logging Development (SRD) and the 100-year-old Bar C Ranch and on an ecotourist operation west of Calgary has Cattle Company Ltd. over harvesting activities affecting its incited renewed debate on the province’s tourism and grazing operation, conservationists see the consultation practices, its land management unprecedented action as an important impetus for reviewing and its multiple-use approach to resource government policies throughout Alberta. extraction. “I’m absolutely delighted the judiciary reminded the Alberta Although the court case hinges government it cannot always do what it likes when it comes to specifically on the inadequacies of the natural resources management, whether it is water or forests, and consultation process between Alberta Sustainable Resources that adequate and timely consultation has to be done,” says Alberta Wilderness Association director Heinz Unger. He lives INSIDE near the ranch in question on Forestry Trunk Road 940, about 60 kilometres west of Calgary. Bar C Ruling Stresses Importance of Public Consultation ..............4 “I would expect the government will have to change its approach, but I’m not certain of it – four years of dealing with ALBERTA WILDERNESS WATCH....................................................5 this government as an ENGO [Environmental Non- Resort Refusal a Win for Bighorn Wildland ......................................5 Burmis Magnetite Mine Decision Expected Soon ............................ 6 Governmental Organization] has made me cynical,” he says. Cheviot Mine Decision Appealed...................................................... 7 AWA has been pushing for a review of the province’s public Motorized Vehicles Not Welcome in Whaleback .............................
    [Show full text]