PRODUCTION PACEA 2017 ___Articles Dans Des Revues
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Den Himmel Stützen! Prozeß, Kognition, Macht, Geschlecht - Soziologische Reflexionen Zum Jung- Paläolithikum Hennings, Lars
www.ssoar.info Den Himmel stützen! Prozeß, Kognition, Macht, Geschlecht - soziologische Reflexionen zum Jung- Paläolithikum Hennings, Lars Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Monographie / monograph Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Hennings, L. (2014). Den Himmel stützen! Prozeß, Kognition, Macht, Geschlecht - soziologische Reflexionen zum Jung-Paläolithikum. Berlin. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-383212 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Basic Digital Peer Publishing-Lizenz This document is made available under a Basic Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Den Himmel stützen! Prozeß, Kognition, Macht, Geschlecht – soziologische Reflexionen zum Jung-Paläolithikum Lars Hennings Berlin 2014 Den Himmel stützen! Prozeß, Kognition, Macht, Geschlecht – soziologische Reflexionen zum Jung-Paläolithikum Lars Hennings Jede Form des Kopierens – Text und Abbildungen – ist untersagt. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Berlin 2014 ISBN 978-1-291-84271-5 29.04.14 frei > www.LarsHennings.de [email protected] 3 Inhaltsverzeichnis Kasten A: Zeiträume .....................................................................4 Annäherung an eine Soziologie der Steinzeit ................................................5 Grundlagen .........................................................................................8 -
Experimentation Preceding Innovation in a MIS5 Pre-Still Bay Layer from Diepkloof Rock Shelter (South Africa): Emerging Technologies and Symbols
RESEARCH ARTICLE Experimentation preceding innovation in a MIS5 Pre-Still Bay layer from Diepkloof Rock Shelter (South Africa): emerging technologies and symbols. Guillaume Porraz1,2, John E. Parkington3, Patrick Schmidt4,5, Gérald Bereiziat6, Jean-Philip Brugal1, Laure Dayet7, Marina Igreja8, Christopher E. Miller9,10, Viola C. Schmid4,11, Chantal Tribolo12,, Aurore 4,2 13 1 Cite as: Porraz, G., Parkington, J. E., Val , Christine Verna , Pierre-Jean Texier Schmidt, P., Bereiziat, G., Brugal, J.- P., Dayet, L., Igreja, M., Miller, C. E., Schmid, V. C., Tribolo, C., Val, A., Verna, C., Texier, P.-J. (2020). 1 Experimentation preceding Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Ministère de la Culture, UMR 7269 Lampea, 5 rue du Château innovation in a MIS5 Pre-Still Bay de l’Horloge, F-13094 Aix-en-Provence, France layer from Diepkloof Rock Shelter 2 University of the Witwatersrand, Evolutionary Studies Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa (South Africa): emerging 3 technologies and symbols. University of Cape Town, Department of Archaeology, Cape Town, South Africa EcoEvoRxiv, ch53r, ver. 3 peer- 4 Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Department of Early Prehistory and Quaternary reviewed and recommended by PCI Ecology, Schloss Hohentübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany Archaeology. doi: 5 10.32942/osf.io/ch53r Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Department of Geosciences, Applied Mineralogy, Wilhelmstraße 56, 72074 Tübingen, Germany. 6 Université de Bordeaux, UMR CNRS 5199 PACEA, F-33615 Pessac, France Posted: 2020-12-17 7 CNRS-Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès, UMR 5608 TRACES, F-31058 Toulouse, France 8 LARC DGPC, Ministry of Culture (Portugal) / ENVARCH Cibio-Inbio 9 Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Institute for Archaeological Sciences & Senckenberg Recommender: Anne Delagnes Center for Human Evolution and Paleoenvironment, Rümelinstr. -
Adorning the Dead a Bio-Archaeological Analysis of Ochre Application to Gravettian Burials
Adorning the Dead A Bio-Archaeological Analysis of Ochre Application to Gravettian Burials Sierra McKinney; University of Victoria ©2016 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Theoretical Orientation ...................................................................................................................... 4 Literature Review ................................................................................................................................. 5 History of Ochre Use: ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Gravettian Burials and the Archaeology Record: .................................................................................. 6 Methods of Ochre Application ...................................................................................................................... 8 Established Gravettian Regional Variation: ......................................................................................... 11 Material and Methodology ............................................................................................................... 14 Burial Database .............................................................................................................................................. 14 GIS Analysis ..................................................................................................................................................... -
La Question De La Visibilité De L'art Pariétal Paléolithique Européen
Année universitaire 2017.-2018. LA QUESTION DE LA VISIBILITÉ DE L’ART PARIÉTAL PALÉOLITHIQUE EUROPÉEN : APPORTS MÉTHODOLOGIQUES INTERDISCIPLINAIRES APPLIQUÉS AU REGISTRE ANIMALIER DU ROC-AUX- SORCIERS (ANGLES-SUR-L’ANGLIN, FRANCE) Présenté par Juliette Boudier--Blet Sous la direction de Camille Bourdier, Maîtresse de conférences en art préhistorique à l’Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès, TRACES, UMR5608 et Alexandra Severac-Cauquil, Maîtresse de conférences à l’Université Paul Sabatier, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, UMR5549, CNRS Mémoire présenté le 22/06/2018. devant le jury du Master Mémoire de Master 2 mention Histoire, Arts et Archéologie Spécialité Arts et Cultures de la Préhistoire et de la Protohistoire : Europe, Afrique REMERCIEMENTS Je tiens tout d’abord à remercier mes deux directrices, Camille Bourdier pour son suivi durant les deux ans de ce Master, ses conseils, son implications sans faille ainsi que ses encouragements qui m’ont permis de réaliser mon rêve ; et Alexandra Severac-Cauquil, qui a accepté avec enthousiasme la curieuse demande d’une étudiante en archéologie préhistorique désireuse de croiser son champ d’étude avec les neurosciences. Merci à toutes les deux de votre temps, conseils et relectures avisées. Je remercie également Emmanuel Demoulin pour l’accès au Parc de la Préhistoire, ainsi que Jacques Azéma ; Olivier Huard pour les photographies de la grotte des Combarelles I, Camille Bourdier pour celles de Cap Blanc et Bertrand Defois, directeur du développement touristique et culturel du centre de préhistoire du Pech Merle, pour le prêt de la lampe à graisse expérimentale. J’ai une pensée pour Monique Veyret, guide de la grotte des Combarelles, qui m’a appris à lire les gravures et a contribué à me plonger dans cette passion dévorante qu’est l’art pariétal paléolithique. -
The Janus-Faced Dilemma of Rock Art Heritage
The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion Mélanie Duval, Christophe Gauchon To cite this version: Mélanie Duval, Christophe Gauchon. The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, Taylor & Francis, In press, 10.1080/13505033.2020.1860329. hal-03078965 HAL Id: hal-03078965 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03078965 Submitted on 21 Feb 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Duval Mélanie, Gauchon Christophe, 2021. The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion, Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2020.1860329 Authors: Mélanie Duval and Christophe Gauchon Mélanie Duval: *Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB), CNRS, Environnements, Dynamics and Territories of Mountains (EDYTEM), Chambéry, France; * Rock Art Research Institute GAES, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Christophe Gauchon: *Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB), CNRS, Environnements, Dynamics and Territories of Mountains (EDYTEM), Chambéry, France. -
Nasal Floor Variation Among Eastern Eurasian Pleistocene Homo Xiu-Jie WU1, Scott D
ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCE Vol. 120(3), 217–226, 2012 Nasal floor variation among eastern Eurasian Pleistocene Homo Xiu-Jie WU1, Scott D. MADDUX2, Lei PAN1,3, Erik TRINKAUS4* 1Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, People’s Republic of China 2Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212, USA 3Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China 4Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA Received 28 March 2012; accepted 9 July 2012 Abstract A bi-level nasal floor, although present in most Pleistocene and recent human samples, reaches its highest frequency among the western Eurasian Neandertals and has been considered a fea- ture distinctive of them. Early modern humans, in contrast, tend to feature a level (or sloping) nasal floor. Sufficiently intact maxillae are rare among eastern Eurasian Pleistocene humans, but several fos- sils provide nasal floor configurations. The available eastern Eurasian Late Pleistocene early modern humans have predominantly level nasal floors, similar to western early modern humans. Of the four observable eastern Eurasian archaic Homo maxillae (Sangiran 4, Chaoxian 1, Xujiayao 1, and Chang- yang 1), three have the bi-level pattern and the fourth is scored as bi-level/sloping. It therefore appears that bi-level nasal floors were common among Pleistocene archaic humans, and a high frequency of them is not distinctive of the Neandertals. Key words: noses, maxilla, Asia, palate, Neandertal Introduction dominate with the bi-level configuration being present in ≤10% in all but a sub-Saharan African “Bantu” sample In his descriptions of the Shanidar Neandertal crania, (Table 1). -
Kosti: Jedna Od Najranijih Sekundarnih Sirovina Selena Vitezović
Kosti: jedna od najranijih sekundarnih sirovina Selena Vitezović DOI: 10.17234/9789531757232-03 Uvod Recikliranje i ponovna uporaba raznih materijala i predmeta javljaju se kroz cijelu ljudsku po- vijest, još od samih početaka (Amick 2015). Međutim, odnos prema praksi recikliranja dosta se mijenjao tijekom vremena i u različitim kulturama. U novije vrijeme recikliranje i ponovna uporaba prošli su kroz nagle i drastične promjene, prvo s industrijskom revolucijom, naglim povećanjem proizvodnje i stvaranjem „potrošačkog društva”, a potom, posljednjih desetljeća, s rastućom svijesti o neophodnosti zaštite okoliša i održivosti resursa (Cooper 2008; Amick - 2015: 4-5). - Recikliranje i ponovna uporaba često se vezuju za nedostatak i štednju (vremena, truda, ma- terijala itd.), osobito iz današnje perspektive, gdje se prikupljanjem sekundarnih sirovina naj češće bave najsiromašniji slojevi društva ili ekonomski vrlo siromašne zemlje. I arheološki do kumentirani primjeri ponovne uporabe često se interpretiraju kroz prizmu današnjeg pogleda,- odnosno kao odraz štednje i ekonomske isplativosti. Razlozi i motivi za recikliranje u različitim kulturama, međutim, nisu bili samo ekonomski, već i kulturni, odražavajući kulturni odnos pre ma određenim predmetima i sirovinama od kojih su nastali (cf. Drackner 2005; Amick 2015). - Arheološki primjeri reciklaže i ponovne uporabe u različitim društvima brojni su i raznovrsni.- Najuočljiviji su primjeri koji se odnose na sekundarno korištenje građevinskoget al. materijala (Bar ker 2010; 2015), kao i u slučajevima -
Growth, Learning, Play and Attachment in Neanderthal Children
This is a repository copy of The Cradle of Thought : Growth, Learning, Play and Attachment in Neanderthal children. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/83027/ Version: Submitted Version Article: Spikins, Penny orcid.org/0000-0002-9174-5168, Hitchens, Gail, Rutherford, Holly et al. (1 more author) (2014) The Cradle of Thought : Growth, Learning, Play and Attachment in Neanderthal children. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. pp. 111-134. ISSN 0262-5253 https://doi.org/10.1111/ojoa.12030 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ THE CRADLE OF THOUGHT: GROWTH, LEARNING, PLAY AND ATTACHMENT IN NEANDERTHAL CHILDREN Penny Spikins, Gail Hitchens, Andy Needham and Holly Rutherford Department of Archaeology University of York King’s Manor York YO1 7EP SUMMARY Childhood is a core stage in development, essential in the acquisition of social, practical and cultural skills. However, this area receives limited attention in archaeological debate, especially in early prehistory. -
Bibliography
Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P. -
UNE NOUVELLE REPRÉSENTATION FÉMININE À La Madeleine (Tursac, Dordogne)
PALEO – N° 21 – 2009-2010 – Pages 127 à 134 UNE NOUVELLE REPRÉSENTATION FÉMININE à La Madeleine (Tursac, Dordogne) Jean-Pierre DUHARD (1) Résumé : L’auteur présente une figure féminine sculptée sur bois de renne, provenant du Magdalénien IV du grand abri de La Madeleine en Dordogne. Elle vient compléter le petit corpus de figurations humaines de ce site, par ailleurs riche en œuvres d’art. Le corps est représenté en vue frontale et se résume à un tronc et à un pelvis, avec indication des racines crurales et du triangle pubo-génital. Dans sa morphologie, il n’est pas sans rappeler la figure gravée de Lespugue et la figure en ronde bosse de Laugerie-Basse et il illustre la tendance au schématisme de ces figures féminines mobilières magdaléniennes. Mots-clés : Paléolithique, Magdalénien, art mobilier, sculpture, figure féminine, La Madeleine. Key-words: Palaeolithic, Magdalenian, mobiliar art, sculpture, female figure, Madeleine. Abridged english version New female representation in La Madeleine (Tursac, Dordogne). The author presents a segment of cortical reindeer antler, elongated and of semi-circular section, carrying a female carved figure from the Magdalenian IV of the large shelter of Madeleine in Dordogne (France) and stored in the Musée national de préhistoire. Discovered by D. Peyrony during his excavations between 1910 and 1913, it had been described in the monography of E. Capitan and D. Peyrony (1928) as a blade dagger (fig. 1). Without prejudice to the use of this object, it provides an unambiguous but schematic representation of a woman (fig. 2, 3, 4, 5), Her body is represented in frontal view, and comes down to the trunk and pelvis, with indication of the starting point of the thighs and the pubogenital triangle. -
Abstracts of Reports and Posters
Abstracts of Reports and Posters Amira Adaileh The Magdalenian site of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld The open air site of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld is located in Sachsen-Anhalt, Eastern Germany. It was discov- ered in the mid 1950´s in the immediate vicinity of the famous Magdalenian site of Saaleck. Since that time, archaeologists collected over 2000 lithic artifacts during systematical surveys. The technological and typological analyses of the lithic artifacts confirmed the assignment of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld to a late Magdalenian. Furthermore, the investigation of the surface collections brought forward information about the character of this camp site, the duration of its occupation and the pattern of raw material procure- ment. The fact that Bad Kösen-Lengefeld is located in a region with more than 100 Magdalenian sites fostered a comparison of the lithic inventory with other Magdalenian assemblages. Thus, allowing to spec- ify the position of the Lengefeld collection within the chorological context of the Magdalenian in Eastern Germany. Jehanne Affolter, Ludovic Mevel Raw material circulation in northern french alps and Jura during lateglacial interstadial : method, new data and paleohistoric implication Since fifteen years the study of the characterization and origin of flint resources used by Magdalenian and Azilian groups in northern French Alps and Jura have received significant research work. Diverse and well distributed spatially, some of these resources were used and disseminated throughout the late Upper Paleolithic. Which changes do we observe during the Magdalenian then for the Azilian? The results of petrographic analysis and techno-economic analysis to several archaeological sites allow us to assess dia- chronic changes in economic behavior of these people and discuss the significance of these results. -
Communiqué De Presse Juin 2018
Communiqué de presse Juin 2018 Mémoire de Mammouth 30 Juin – 12 novembre 2018 Musée national de Préhistoire Les Eyzies-de-Tayac (Dordogne) Le mammouth est incontestablement l’animal le plus emblématique des temps préhistoriques, du moins si l’on entend par préhistoire la période couvrant les origines et l’évolution de l’Homme jusqu’à l’avènement de l’écriture. Les quelques millions d’années concernées connaissent une série d’oscillations climatiques auxquelles correspondent plusieurs espèces d’éléphantidés, mammouths et éléphants. Durant le Quaternaire en France, on dénombre au moins quatre espèces : le mammouth méridional (Mammuthus meridionalis), le mammouth des steppes (Mammuthus trogontherii), l’éléphant antique, à défenses droites (Palaeoloxodon antiquus) et le mammouth laineux (Mammuthus primigenius), auquel il faut ajouter un Mammuthus intermedius dont le statut d’espèce à part fait encore débat. Tous ces animaux présentent des caractéristiques physiques similaires, une trompe (probocis en grec), une taille importante, culminant à plus de 4,5 m pour le mammouth des steppes, des membres en pilier qui se terminent sur cinq doigts. Mais c’est leur dentition qui les distingue : outre les défenses (incisives supérieures à croissance continue), il n’y a que des molaires et chaque nouvelle dent provoque l’expulsion de la précédente. Enfin, la morphologie des molaires caractérise les éléphantidés car elles sont constituées de nombreux reliefs transversaux, les lamelles. Durant la deuxième moitié du Quaternaire, à partir de 1 million d’années à peu près, la présence de l’Homme est bien attestée en France et plusieurs questions se posent désormais sur les relations entretenues entre le plus gros mammifère terrestre et nos ancêtres.