V. Case 2:10-Cv-05026-ES-MAH Document 32 Filed 10/20/14 Page
I 1 ,, II Case 2:10-cv-05026-ES-MAH Document 32 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 55 PageID: <pageID> FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY THADDEUS JAMES THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. SHANTA Y BRAME ADAMS, et al., Civil Action No. 10-5026 (DRD) Defendants. RONALD NASH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10-2113 (DRD) CHRIS CHRISTIE et al., OPINION Defendants. APPLIES TO BOTH ACTIONS Appearances: Lawrence S. Lustberg, Esq., Gibbons P.C. 1 Gateway Center, Newark, New Jersey 07102 for Thaddeus James Thomas, Plaintiff Michael R. Yellin, Esq., Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A. Court Plaza North, 25 Main Street, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 for Ronald Nash, Plaintiff David L. Dacosta and Daniel M. Vannella, Esqs., Office of the New Jersey Attorney General Department of Law & Public Safety and R.J. Hughes Justice Complex, 25 Market Street, Trenton, New Jersey 08625 for Defendants Christopher J. Christie, Paula T. Dow, Gary M. Lanigan, Jennifer Velez, John Main, Jonathan Poag, Merrill Main, Shantay Braim Adams and Jackie Ottino Case 2:10-cv-05026-ES-MAH Document 32 Filed 10/20/14 Page 2 of 55 PageID: <pageID> Debevoise, Senior District Judge: Moving to dismiss Plaintiffs claims, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Defendants essentially maintain that Plaintiffs failed to state a plausible claim against them simply because Defendants are high-ranking supervising officials, and Plaintiffs' facts lack the particularities of Defendants' decision-making process and actions. This Court disagrees and will deny Defendants' motions, in part, and grant them in part.
[Show full text]