DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Control of Chinese Tallow Triadica Sebifera, Euphorbiaceae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Control of Chinese Tallow Triadica Sebifera, Euphorbiaceae Biological control of Chinese tallow Triadica sebifera, Euphorbiaceae • Greg Wheeler, USDA/ARS/IPRL Ft Lauderdale, FL • S. Steininger, C. Nguyen, K. Dyer, S. Wright, USDA/ARS • Jianqing Ding, Yi Wang, Wei Huang, Jialiang Zhang – Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan China • Matt Purcell, CSIRO, Australia Biological control of Chinese tallow • Overseas surveys • Quarantine host testing • Preparation for field release of agents Triadica sebifera (Chinese Tallow, Popcorn Tree, Tallowtree, Florida Aspen) Tallow distribution in China • Distributed in China south of the Yellow river to Hong Kong • Cultivated sp. • Possibly 200 spp of herbivore pests that are potential biological control agents Tallow’s distribution US • The dominant woody sp in many forests & wetlands • Infestations impact endangered Whooping crane and Attwater’s prairie chicken populations • Expanding range, $200- $400 million to control over next 20 yrs EDDMapS 2012 • biological control is a sustainable, cost- effective alternative Tallow biological control agents Heterapoderopsis bicallosicollis Bikasha collaris Gadirtha fusca Caloptilia triadicae Heterapoderopsis bicallosicollis Bikasha collaris flea beetle Bikasha collaris Adult Feeding Larval Feeding Bikasha collaris Damaged roots Results (Larvae) • 68 & 78 non-target species tested by Chinese & USDA/ARS/IPRL • All larvae quickly died on non-targets, except: – Hippomane mancinella (manchineel) (3 of 80 larvae ate roots - died) – Ricinus communis (castorbean) (2 of 50 larva matured to adult - died) • Choice tests of 10 spp completed with little damage to non-targets Results (Adults) • 78 non-target species have been tested no- choice starvation tests – Feeding (nibbling) occurred on three species • Ditrysinia (=Sebastiania) fruticosa (Gulf Sebastian bush) • Gymnanthes lucida (Oysterwood) S. Fla sp • Hippomane mancinella (manchineel) S. Fla sp • Eggs only produced when adults fed tallow – – no reproduction on other spp • Choice tests with non-targets indicates < 1% feeding compared with control on H. mancinella, Euphorbia hypericifolia (sandmat), and Manihot esculenta (cassava) Bikasha impact • Larvae 0, 5,10/plt • Adults 0, 5, 10/plt • Both larvae & adults decrease biomass • Greatest impact from both larval & adult feeding Number of larvae | Number of adults New Insects on Tallow •Gadirtha fusca (Nolidae) Gadirtha inexacta •Narrow host range from Chinese larvae field surveys and lab tests •Quarantine 2012 and being tested now (Jan 2015) •Larvae safe (38 spp tested) •Very damaging Leaves fed to Leaf damage of one late instar one larva after larva 2 days (135 cm2) New Insects on Tallow - insects being developed •Unidentified stem galling midge •Abundant in many Midge stem gall areas of China •Work continues in China The Adventive Biological Control Agent • Appeared nr Tampa & Gainesville in 2008 • From China (Caloptilia triadicae) • Heavy damage to Tallow plants Tallow biological control release study •Sites in North Florida •Pre-release description of the plant population •Population recruitment, growth and mortality (~100 plants/site) •Plant biomass allocation (~30 plants/site) •Monitor each year & compare impact of biological control pre- release vs post-release Tallow demographics in North Florida sites • Factors influence demography (mortality, growth, reproduction)? • Possible factors: – Water depth and duration of flooding • data suggests increased mortality and decreased growth. Reproduction? – Herbivory Tallow demographics in North Florida sites • Survival greatest 100 for large 80 trees 60 • Seedlings had Survival (%) 40 Seedlings 20 Saplings highest Reproductive trees mortality 0 2012 2013 2014 Years Could flood influence tree mortality? Response to flooding • hypertrophy of lenticels • adventitious roots Caloptilia Impact on tallow • What is the effect of Caloptilia on tallow demographics? • Our studies show complete defoliation, suggesting more herbivores needed Tallow biological control Priorities 2015: China •Gall midge rearing & specificity Florida •Continue: • flea beetle TAG • moth Gadirtha fusca - TAG •Gall midge Bikasha collaris Gadirtha fusca specificity larvae • Pre-release demographics Acknowledgements • Funding: Florida Fish Wildlife Conservation Commission (D. Schmitz, D. Leslie, G. Jubinsky) National Park Service (T. Pernas) USDA/ARS • Work: S. Steininger, C. Nguyen, S. Wright, K. Dyer USDA/ARS Jianqing Ding, Yi Wang, Wei Huang, Jialiang Zhang, Chinese Academy of Science Purcell, M. CSIRO A. Christman, Paynes Prairie Preserve, DEP M. Cole, G. Nichols, SJRWMD .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Feedstock List (As of 3/2018)
    Feedstock List (as of 3/2018) FOG: Fats / Oils / Greases Wastes / Oil Seeds Algae / Aquatic Species Industrial Aloe (Aloe vera) Meadowfoam (Limnanthes alba) Brown grease Cyanobacteria Babassu (Attalea speciosa) Mustard (Sinapis alba) Crude glycerine Halophytes (e.g., Salicornia bigelovii) *Camelina (Camelina sativa)* Nuts Fish oil Lemna (Lemna spp.) *Canola, winter (Brassica napus[occasionally rapa Olive (Olea europaea) Industrial effluent (palm) Macroalgae or campestris])* *Carinata (Brassica carinata)* Palm (Elaeis guineensis) Shrimp oil (Caridea) Mallow (Malva spp.) Castor (Ricinus communis) Peanut, Cull (Arachis hypogaea) Tall oil pitch Microalgae Citrus (Citron spp.) Pennycress (Thlaspi arvense) Tallow / Lard Spirodela (Spirodela polyrhiza) Coconut (Cocos nucifera) Pongamia (Millettia pinnata) White grease Wolffia (Wolffia arrhiza) Corn, inedible (Zea mays) Poppy (Papaver rhoeas) Waste vegetable oil Cottonseed (Gossypium) *Rapeseed (Brassica napus)* Yellow grease Croton megalocarpus Oryza sativa Croton ( ) Rice Bran ( ) Cuphea (Cuphea viscossisima) Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) Flax / Linseed (Linum usitatissimum) Sesame (Sesamum indicum) Gourds / Melons (Cucumis melo) Soybean (Glycine max) Grapeseed (Vitis vinifera) Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Hemp seeds (Cannabis sativa) Tallow tree (Triadica sebifera) Jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis) Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Jatropha (Jatropha curcas) Calophyllum inophyllum Kamani ( ) Lesquerella (Lesquerella fenderi) Cellulose Woody Grasses Residues Other Types: Arundo (Arundo donax) Bagasse
    [Show full text]
  • Bioenergy and Invasive Plants: Quantifying and Mitigating Future Risks
    Invasive Plant Science and Management 2014 7:199–209 Bioenergy and Invasive Plants: Quantifying and Mitigating Future Risks Jacob N. Barney* The United States is charging toward the largest expansion of agriculture in 10,000 years with vast acreages of primarily exotic perennial grasses planted for bioenergy that possess many traits that may confer invasiveness. Cautious integration of these crops into the bioeconomy must be accompanied by development of best management practices and regulation to mitigate the risk of invasion posed by this emerging industry. Here I review the current status of United States policy drivers for bioenergy, the status of federal and state regulation related to invasion mitigation, and survey the scant quantitative literature attempting to quantify the invasive potential of bioenergy crops. A wealth of weed risk assessments are available on exotic bioenergy crops, and generally show a high risk of invasion, but should only be a first-step in quantifying the risk of invasion. The most information exists for sterile giant miscanthus, with preliminary empirical studies and demographic models suggesting a relatively low risk of invasion. However, most important bioenergy crops are poorly studied in the context of invasion risk, which is not simply confined to the production field; but also occurs in crop selection, harvest and transport, and feedstock storage. Thus, I propose a nested-feedback risk assessment (NFRA) that considers the entire bioenergy supply chain and includes the broad components of weed risk assessment, species distribution models, and quantitative empirical studies. New information from the NFRA is continuously fed back into other components to further refine the risk assessment; for example, empirical dispersal kernels are utilized in landscape-level species distribution models, which inform habitat invasibility studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Stillingia: a Newly Recorded Genus of Euphorbiaceae from China
    Phytotaxa 296 (2): 187–194 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.296.2.8 Stillingia: A newly recorded genus of Euphorbiaceae from China SHENGCHUN LI1, 2, BINGHUI CHEN1, XIANGXU HUANG1, XIAOYU CHANG1, TIEYAO TU*1 & DIANXIANG ZHANG1 1 Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China * Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract Stillingia (Euphorbiaceae) contains ca. 30 species from Latin America, the southern United States, and various islands in the tropical Pacific and in the Indian Ocean. We report here for the first time the occurrence of a member of the genus in China, Stillingia lineata subsp. pacifica. The distribution of the genus in China is apparently narrow, known only from Pingzhou and Wanzhou Islands of the Wanshan Archipelago in the South China Sea, which is close to the Pearl River estuary. This study updates our knowledge on the geographic distribution of the genus, and provides new palynological data as well. Key words: Island, Hippomaneae, South China Sea, Stillingia lineata Introduction During the last decade, hundreds of new plant species or new species records have been added to the flora of China. Nevertheless, newly described or newly recorded plant genera are not discovered and reported very often, suggesting that botanical expedition and plant survey at the generic level may be advanced in China. As far as we know, only six and eight angiosperm genera respectively have been newly described or newly recorded from China within the last ten years (Qiang et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora and Vegetation Classification of the South Atlantic Coastal Plain Limestone Forest Association of Central Georgia
    VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH (Under the Direction of J.L. Hamrick) ABSTRACT The South Atlantic Coastal Plain Limestone forest is a globally imperiled (G2) forest association known only from the upper Coastal Plain of central Georgia. These calcareous forest communities support diverse floristic assemblages unique among the Georgia Coastal Plain, but have not been subject to detailed floristic study. I conducted a comprehensive floristic inventory, multivariate community analyses and floristic quality assessments to document composition, elucidate community structure and underlying physiographic regimes, and assess habitat integrity for seven sites in Houston, Bleckley and Twiggs counties. Community analyses revealed twelve community types within two floristically defined domains corresponding to uplands and slopes, and bottomlands, respectively, and governed largely by moisture content and degree of inclination. Floristic quality assessments revealed varying degrees of floristic quality and habitat integrity corresponding primarily to local physiography and disturbance history. Floristic inventory recovered 339 vascular plant taxa representing 218 genera in 98 families, including 17 rare Georgia species. INDEX WORDS: Limestone forest, community analysis, floristic inventory, floristic quality assessment, Georgia, Coastal Plain. VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH B.S., The University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 2006 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2010 © 2012 Patrick Sumner Lynch All Rights Reserved VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH Major Professor: J.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Chassahowitzka Chassahowitzka Plan Comprehensive Conservation
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Chassahowitzka NationalWildlifeRefuge Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge Refuge Manager: Michael Lusk, (Project Leader) 1502 S.E. Kings Bay Drive Crystal River, FL 34429 Phone: (352) 563-2088 / ext. 202 Fax: (352) 795-7961 E-mail: [email protected] U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1 800/344 WILD http://www.fws.gov Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive ConservationPlan September 2012 Comprehensive Conservation Plan USFWS Photos Photo Credits: Operation Migration, by Keith Ramos Dog Island, by Amber Breland Chass Aerial, by Joyce Kleen Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long-term guidance for manage- ment decisions; set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accom- plish refuge purposes; and identify the Fish and Wildlife Service’s best esti- mate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region September 2012 COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN CHASSAHOWITZKA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Citrus and Hernando Counties, Florida U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia September
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Tallow Tree (Triadica Sebifera)
    THE WEEDY TRUTH ABOUT BIOFUELS TIM LOW & CAROL BOOTH Invasive Species Council October 2007 Title: The Weedy Truth About Biofuels Authors: Tim Low & Carol Booth Published by the Invasive Species Council, Melbourne October 2007 Updated March 2008 The INVASIVE SPECIES COUNCIL is a non-government organisation that works to protect the Australian environment from invasive pest species. Address: PO Box 166, Fairfield, Vic 3078 Email: [email protected] Website: www.invasives.org.au Further copies of this report can be obtained from the ISC website at www.invasives.org.au Cover photo: Spartina alterniflora, by the US Department of Agriculture CCOONNTTEENNTTSS Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 What are biofuels? ................................................................................................................ 2 The Biofuel industry .............................................................................................................. 4 The problems with biofuels ................................................................................................ 6 Social and economic issues ............................................................................................ 6 Greenhouse issues ............................................................................................................ 7 Biodiversity issues ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notices Federal Register Vol
    6289 Notices Federal Register Vol. 86, No. 12 Thursday, January 21, 2021 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER www.regulations.gov/ comment. We will consider all contains documents other than rules or #!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2020-0035 or comments that we receive on or before proposed rules that are applicable to the in our reading room, which is located in the date listed under the heading DATES public. Notices of hearings and investigations, room 1620 of the USDA South Building, at the beginning of this notice. committee meetings, agency decisions and 14th Street and Independence Avenue The EA may be viewed on the rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency SW, Washington, DC. Normal reading Regulations.gov website or in our statements of organization and functions are room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., reading room (see ADDRESSES above for examples of documents appearing in this Monday through Friday, except a link to Regulations.gov and section. holidays. To be sure someone is there to information on the location and hours of help you, please call (202) 799–7039 the reading room). You may also request before coming. paper copies of the EA by calling or DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. writing to the person listed under FOR Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director, FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Please Animal and Plant Health Inspection Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol refer to the title of the EA when Service Permits, Permitting and Compliance requesting copies. [Docket No. APHIS–2020–0035] Coordination, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River The EA has been prepared in Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737; accordance with: (1) The National Notice of Availability of an (301) 851–2327; email: Colin.Stewart@ Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Environmental Assessment for usda.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Tallow Invasion in Maritime Forests: Understand Invasion Mechanism and Develop Ecologically-Based Management Lauren Susan Pile Clemson University
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 12-2015 Chinese Tallow Invasion in Maritime Forests: Understand Invasion Mechanism and Develop Ecologically-Based Management Lauren Susan Pile Clemson University Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Part of the Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Pile, Lauren Susan, "Chinese Tallow Invasion in Maritime Forests: Understand Invasion Mechanism and Develop Ecologically-Based Management" (2015). All Dissertations. 1807. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/1807 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHINESE TALLOW INVASION IN MARITIME FORESTS: UNDERSTAND INVASION MECHANISM AND DEVELOP ECOLOGICALLY-BASED MANAGEMENT A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Forest Resources by Lauren Susan Pile December 2015 Accepted by: G. Geoff Wang, Committee Chair William C. Bridges Jr. Patricia A. Layton Thomas A. Waldrop Joan L. Walker ABSTRACT Invasion by highly aggressive, non-native, invasive plants is a significant threat to management and conservation priorities as these plants can transform ecosystem functions and processes. In this study, I investigated the non-native, invasive tree, Chinese tallow
    [Show full text]
  • Heterogeneity of a Tree Species Community in an Alluvial Area of Santa Catarina, Brazil
    Floresta e Ambiente 2018; 25(2): e00096514 https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.096514 ISSN 2179-8087 (online) Original article Conservation of Nature Heterogeneity of a Tree Species Community in an Alluvial Area of Santa Catarina, Brazil Didiane Ana Gonçalves1, Ana Carolina da Silva1, Pedro Higuchi1, Aline Gross1, Luiz Carlos Rodrigues Junior1, Felipe Fornara Walter1, Rodineli Loebens1, Francieli de Fátima Missio1, Francieli Pscheidt1, Tiago de Souza Ferreira1, Carla Carolina Chini Rech1, Angélica Dalla Rosa1, Fernando Buzzi Junior1, Marco Antonio Bento1, Aline Pereira Cruz1 1Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina – UDESC, Lages/SC, Brasil ABSTRACT The aim of the present study was to characterize the floristic-structural heterogeneity of the tree species in an alluvial forest remnant considering three sectors: forest-river edge, forest interior and forest/non-forest matrix edge. Forty-eight plots of 200 m2 were allocated and all tree individuals with a diameter at breast height (dbh) equal to or greater than 5 cm were measured and identified. Data was analyzed by Shannon’s diversity index, Pielou evenness and phytosociological descriptors. Plots were ordered through NMDS. Sixty-six species were sampled and Myrtaceae was found to be the richest family. Diversity and evenness reached 2.96 and 0.71, respectively. Sebastiania commersoniana (Baill.) L.B.Sm. & Downs presented the highest importance value (21.22%). The NMDS showed that tree components are spatially partitioned according to sectors, therefore indicating floristic-structural heterogeneity. Keywords: floodplain forest, phytosociology, Mixed Ombrophilous Forest. Creative Commons License. All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
    [Show full text]
  • Persea Borbonia) Population Structure and Forest Communities in the Coastal Plain of Georgia, USA
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Summer 2010 Impacts of Laurel Wilt Disease on Redbay (Persea Borbonia) Population Structure and Forest Communities in the Coastal Plain of Georgia, USA Kimberly S. Spiegel Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Recommended Citation Spiegel, Kimberly S., "Impacts of Laurel Wilt Disease on Redbay (Persea Borbonia) Population Structure and Forest Communities in the Coastal Plain of Georgia, USA" (2010). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 746. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/746 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IMPACTS OF LAUREL WILT DISEASE ON REDBAY (PERSEA BORBONIA) POPULATION STRUCTURE AND FOREST COMMUNITIES IN THE COASTAL PLAIN OF GEORGIA, USA by KIMBERLY S. SPIEGEL (Under the direction of Lissa M. Leege) ABSTRACT Laurel wilt disease (LWD), a fungal disease vectored by the non-native redbay ambrosia beetle (Xyleborus glabratus), has caused mortality of redbay (Persea borbonia) in the Coastal Plain of Georgia, USA, since 2003. This disease has spread 30-100 km/year and little research has evaluated its impacts on redbay population structure and forest communities. Healthy and infested populations of redbay and their associated communities were compared in five sites infested with LWD and three un-infested sites in five counties in Georgia.
    [Show full text]