DOCSLIB.ORG

Amicus Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amicus Brief Case: 20-3434 Document: 28 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/29/2021 Nos. 20-3434, 20-3492 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ FDRLST MEDIA, LLC, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. ________________ On Review from the National Labor Relations Board (No. 02-CA-243109) ________________ BRIEF OF TECHFREEDOM AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER AND REVERSAL ________________ Corbin K. Barthold Berin Szóka James Dunstan TECHFREEDOM 110 Maryland Ave., NE Suite 205 Washington, DC 20002 (925) 788-6847 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus Curiae March 29, 2021 TechFreedom Case: 20-3434 Document: 28 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/29/2021 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Rule 26.1 and Third Circuit LAR 26.1, TechFreedom makes the following disclosures: 1) For non-governmental corporate parties, please list all parent corporations: Not applicable. TechFreedom is a non-profit corporation organized under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. TechFreedom has no parent corporation. 2) For non-governmental corporate parties, please list all publicly held companies that hold 10% or more of the party’s stock: Not applicable. TechFreedom has issued no stock. 3) If there is a publicly held corporation which is not a party to the proceeding before this Court but which has a financial interest in the outcome of the proceeding, please identify all such parties and specify the nature of the financial interest or interests: TechFreedom is unaware of any such corporation, apart from those identified by the parties. 4) In all bankruptcy appeals counsel for the debtor or trustee of the bankruptcy estate must list: (1) the debtor, if not identified in the case caption; (2) the members of the creditors’ committee or the top 20 unsecured creditors; and (3) any entity not named in the caption which is an active participant in the bankruptcy proceeding. Case: 20-3434 Document: 28 Page: 3 Date Filed: 03/29/2021 If the debtor or trustee is not participating in the appeal, this information must be provided by appellant. Not applicable. March 29, 2021 /s/ Corbin K. Barthold Counsel for TechFreedom Case: 20-3434 Document: 28 Page: 4 Date Filed: 03/29/2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ............................................................................ 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................................................................. 2 ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................. 5 THE BOARD SHOULD HAVE APPLIED STRICT SCRUTINY, FOUND NO THREAT UNDER SECTION 8(A), AND RULED IN FAVOR OF PETITIONER ........... 5 A. Watts (1969) and Gissel Packing (1969) Create Distinct Rules For “Political” Threats And “Labor-Relations” Threats ....................... 5 B. Post-1969 Supreme Court Decisions Make Clear That Free- Speech Distinctions Based On Content, Viewpoint, Or Speaker Are Subject To Strict Scrutiny .............................................................. 9 C. Had It Applied Strict Scrutiny, The Board’s Analysis Would Have Tracked Watts—Which Found No Threat ................................. 12 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 17 CERTIFICATE OF BAR MEMBERSHIP, COMPLIANCE WITH WORD- COUNT AND TYPEFACE REQUIREMENTS, AND VIRUS CHECK .............. 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ................................................................................ 19 i Case: 20-3434 Document: 28 Page: 5 Date Filed: 03/29/2021 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES: Belcher Towing Co. v. NLRB, 726 F.2d 705 (11th Cir. 1984) ............................................................................ 14 Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010) ............................................................................................ 11 DeBartolo Corp. v. Fla. Gulf Coast Trades Council, 485 U.S. 568 (1988) ............................................................................................ 15 Fisher v. Univ. of Texas at Austin, 570 U.S. 297 (2013) ............................................................................................ 12 Girouard v. United States, 328 U.S. 61 (1946) ................................................................................................ 2 Intertape Polymer Corp. v. NLRB, 801 F.3d 224 (4th Cir. 2015) ........................................................................ 13, 15 J.P. Stevens Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 638 F.2d 676 (4th Cir. 1980) .............................................................................. 14 McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. v. NLRB, 131 F.3d 1026 (D.C. Cir. 1997) .......................................................................... 13 New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) .............................................................................................. 6 NIFLA v. Becerra, 138 S. Ct. 2361 (2018) ........................................................................................ 10 NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575 (1969) .....................................................................................passim ii Case: 20-3434 Document: 28 Page: 6 Date Filed: 03/29/2021 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page(s) NLRB v. Hasbro Indus., Inc., 672 F.2d 978 (1st Cir. 1982) ............................................................................... 14 NLRB v. IAB Local 229, 974 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2020) ........................................................................ 9, 11 NLRB v. Lovejoy Indus., Inc., 904 F.2d 397 (7th Cir. 1990) ........................................................................ 14, 15 R.A.V. v. St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992) ...................................................................................... 10, 11 Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 576 U.S. 155 (2015) ........................................................................................ 9, 10 United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644 (1929) .............................................................................................. 2 Watts v. United States, 394 U.S. 705 (1969) .....................................................................................passim STATUTES: 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) ............................................................................................................ 2 § 158(c) ........................................................................................................... 3, 15 MISCELLANEOUS: Berin Szóka & Ashkhen Kazaryan, Section 230: An Introduction for Antitrust & Consumer Protection Practitioners, The Global Antitrust Institute Report on the Digital Economy (2020) ............................................................................. 1, 2 iii Case: 20-3434 Document: 28 Page: 7 Date Filed: 03/29/2021 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page(s) Comments of TechFreedom, Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, FCC Docket RM-11862 (Sept. 2, 2020) ............................................................... 1 Helen Raleigh, 3 Strategies For Dismantling Digital Totalitarianism In America, The Federalist (Oct. 28, 2020) .............................................................................. 1 Tristan Justice, Ben Domenech On Google: We’ve Been Warning About This Censorship For Years, The Federalist (June 21, 2020) ........................................ 2 iv Case: 20-3434 Document: 28 Page: 8 Date Filed: 03/29/2021 INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE* TechFreedom is a nonprofit, nonpartisan think tank based in Washington, D.C. It is dedicated to promoting technological progress that improves the human condition. It seeks to advance public policy that makes experimentation, entrepreneurship, and investment possible. Government over-regulation of online speech is a major threat to free expression, free association, and the open Internet. Accordingly, TechFreedom has defended websites’ right to moderate speech for themselves, and to be free of liability for others’ speech, under Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934. See, e.g., Comments of TechFreedom, Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, FCC Docket RM-11862, https://bit.ly/31XVlpe (Sept. 2, 2020). The petitioner, FDRLST Media, LLC, which publishes a website called The Federalist, does not share TechFreedom’s view about the importance of Section 230. See, e.g., Helen Raleigh, 3 Strategies For Dismantling Digital Totalitarianism In America, The Federalist, https://bit.ly/39EsXLH (Oct. 28, 2020). When Google threatened, in June 2020, to stop monetizing The Federalist through web advertising, TechFreedom criticized The Federalist’s position on Section 230, and defended Google’s right to invoke it. See Berin Szóka & Ashkhen * No party’s counsel authored any part of this brief. No one, apart from TechFreedom and its counsel, contributed money intended to fund the brief’s preparation or submission. All parties have consented to the brief’s being filed. 1 Case: 20-3434 Document: 28 Page: 9 Date Filed: 03/29/2021 Kazaryan, Section 230: An Introduction for Antitrust & Consumer Protection Practitioners, The Global Antitrust Institute Report on the Digital Economy 1088- 92, https://bit.ly/2XQeyXq (2020). Google wanted to disassociate itself from derogatory statements made in The Federalist’s comments sections. See id. TechFreedom disagrees
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JD(NY)-04-20 New York, NY UNITED STATES of AMERICA BEFORE the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD DIVISION of JUDGES FDRLST MEDIA, LL
    JD(NY)-04-20 New York, NY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD DIVISION OF JUDGES FDRLST MEDIA, LLC, and Case 02‒CA‒243109 JOEL FLEMING, An Individual Jamie Rucker, Esq., for the General Counsel. Aditya Dynar, Esq., Kara Rollins, Esq., and Jared McClain, Esq., for the Respondent. DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE KENNETH W. CHU, Administrative Law Judge. This case was tried in New York, New York on February 10, 2020. Joel Fleming, an individual filed the charge on June 7, 2019. Region 2 of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued the complaint on September 11, 2019.1 The complaint alleges that FDRLST Media, LLC (Respondent) violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (Act) when its Executive Officer, Ben Domenech, who serves as the publisher of the Respondent’s website, The Federalist, issued a public “Tweet” on June 6, 2019 that had threatened employees with the comment, “FYI@fdrlst first one of you tries to unionize I swear I’ll send you back to the salt mine” (GC Exh. 1(c)).2 The Respondent provided a timely answer denying the material allegations in the complaint (GC Exh. 1(e)). On the entire record and after consideration of the posthearing briefs filed by the General Counsel and the Respondent, I make the following3 FINDINGS OF FACT I. JURISDICTION The Respondent is engaged in the publication of websites, electronic newsletters and satellite radio shows. The Respondent admits it is a Delaware corporation, with an office at 611 1 All dates are 2019 unless otherwise indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • White Male Heterosexist Norms in the Confirmation Process Theresa M
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives Faculty Scholarship 2011 White Male Heterosexist Norms in the Confirmation Process Theresa M. Beiner University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawrepository.ualr.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Judges Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Theresa M. Beiner, White Male Heterosexist Norms in the Confirmation Process, 32 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 105 (2011). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHITE MALE HETEROSEXIST NORMS IN THE CONFIRMATION PROCESS Theresa M Beiner* I. INTRODUCTION Justice Sonia Sotomayor's confirmation hearing took a controversial turn when commentators became aware of a reference in the New York Times to a portion of a speech she gave in 2001.1 In that speech, she candidly addressed how her background might influence her decision making opining, "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." 2 Eight years later a minor . Nadine Baum Distinguished Professor of Law, Associate Dean for Faculty Development, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, William H. Bowen School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brookings Institution Falk Auditorium
    1 SURVEY-2015/11/17 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION FALK AUDITORIUM ANXIETY, NOSTALGIA, AND MISTRUST: FINDINGS FROM THE 2015 AMERICAN VALUES SURVEY Washington, D.C. Tuesday, November 17, 2015 PARTICIPANTS: Moderators: E.J. DIONNE, JR. W. Averell Harriman Chair and Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution WILLIAM A. GALSTON Ezra K. Zilkha Chair and Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution Presentation of Survey Results: ROBERT P. JONES Chief Executive Officer Public Religion Research Institute Panelists: KARLYN BOWMAN Senior Fellow and Research Coordinator American Enterprise Institute HENRY OLSEN Senior Fellow Ethics & Public Policy Center JOY REID National Correspondent MSNBC * * * * * ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 2 SURVEY-2015/11/17 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. DIONNE: Good morning, everybody. I'm E.J. Dionne, a Senior Fellow here at Brookings. I want to welcome everyone here today for another in a series of extraordinary studies conducted by PRRI that we at Brookings have been honored to be part of over the years. Anxiety, Nostalgia, and Mistrust. It sounds almost like a philosophical treatise. As I say we've had the pleasure and good fortune for the last several years to collaborate with Robby Jones and Dan Cox at PRRI and it's been a real joy. And if I my invoke Robert Bork, an intellectual feast to be engaged with PRRI. This is the sixth annual American Values Survey and the fifth that we've had the pleasure to collaborate on. I just want to begin my thank yous because those always get lost if you wait until the end and there are a lot of people who've worked very hard, both on the report and on this event.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    Nos. 14-556, 14-562, 14-571, 14-574 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States JAMES OBERGEFELL, et al., Petitioners, v. RICHARD HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al., Respondents. ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE KENNETH B. MEHLMAN ET AL. SUPPORTING PETITIONERS SEAN R. GALLAGHER REGINALD J. BROWN STACY A. CARPENTER SETH P. WAXMAN BENNETT L. COHEN Counsel of Record POLSINELLI PC PAUL R.Q. WOLFSON 1515 Wynkoop Street DINA B. MISHRA Suite 600 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING Denver, CO 80202 HALE AND DORR LLP 1875 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 663-6000 [email protected] ADDITIONAL CAPTIONS AND COUNSEL LISTED ON INSIDE COVER BRITTANI HENRY, et al., Petitioners, v. RICHARD HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al., Respondents. VALERIA TANCO, et al., Petitioners, v. WILLIAM EDWARD “BILL” HASLAM, et al., Respondents. APRIL DEBOER, et al., Petitioners, v. RICHARD SNYDER, et al., Respondents. GREGORY BOURKE, et al., Petitioners, v. STEVE BESHEAR, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS GOVERNOR OF KENTUCKY, Respondent. MARK C. FLEMING FELICIA H. ELLSWORTH ELISABETH M. OPPENHEIMER ALLISON TRZOP WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 ALAN E. SCHOENFELD WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 7 World Trade Center 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ......................................... 1 ARGUMENT ....................................................................... 6 I. EQUAL ACCESS TO CIVIL MARRIAGE PRO- MOTES THE CONSERVATIVE VALUES OF STABILITY, MUTUAL SUPPORT, AND MU- TUAL OBLIGATION .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Case: 20-3434 Document: 24 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/23/2021 Nos. 20-3434, 20-3492 United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit _____________________________________ FDRLST MEDIA, LLC, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. _____________________________________ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD CASE NUMBER 02-CA-243109 PETITIONER/CROSS-RESPONDENT’S OPENING BRIEF ADITYA DYNAR JARED MCCLAIN KARA ROLLINS MARK CHENOWETH NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE 1225 19th St. NW, Suite 450 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 869-5210 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner/Cross-Respondent Case: 20-3434 Document: 24 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/23/2021 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and L.A.R. 26.1, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent makes the following disclosure: There are no parent corporations of FDRLST Media, LLC. No publicly held company holds 10% or more of FDRLST Media, LLC’s stock. /s/ Aditya Dynar Aditya Dynar ii Case: 20-3434 Document: 24 Page: 3 Date Filed: 03/23/2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT .................................................................. ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................................................................................. v GLOSSARY ............................................................................................................................ xvi INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How the Political Red Lines Disappeared: a Modern History of American Democratic Norm Decline
    Wesleyan University The Honors College How the Political Red Lines Disappeared: A Modern History of American Democratic Norm Decline by Peter Wallace Dunphy Class of 2018 A thesis submitted to the faculty of Wesleyan University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Departmental Honors in Government and American Studies Middletown, Connecticut April, 2018 1 “Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.” - Richard Nixon 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Hillary Clinton once said it takes a village to raise a child. I think it took closer to a metropolis to write this thesis. I would be remiss if I did not first thank Professor Logan Dancey for serving as my thesis advisor. The most rewarding part of writing a thesis was cultivating an intellectual relationship with Professor Dancey. Thank you for providing me with academic, professional, and emotional encouragement throughout this year-long process. If anyone high up in the Government Department is reading this, I hope this serves as a strong recommendation to give Professor Dancey tenure. Throughout the year, I also had the immense pleasure of working with the Congressional Politics and Elections Lab to workshop theses and independent research. This group of fantastic scholars, Emma Solomon, Carly King, Tess Counts, and Sam Prescott, both provided incredible feedback while also serving as a fantastic way to spend every Tuesday night. Appreciation beyond words must be given to Frank Tucci, who has continued to support me throughout this entire endeavor, no matter how annoying it must have been to hear me talk about democratic norms for an entire year.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open Strait Oregon 0171A 12876.Pdf
    OCCUPYING A THIRD PLACE: PRO-LIFE FEMINISM, LEGIBLE POLITICS, AND THE EDGE OF WOMEN’S LIBERATION by LAURA STRAIT A DISSERTATION Presented to the School of Journalism and Communication and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2020 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Laura Strait Title: Occupying a Third Place: Pro-Life Feminism, Legible Politics, and the Edge of Women's Liberation This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the School of Journalism and Communication by: Gretchen Soderlund Chairperson Carol Stabile Core Member Biswarup Sen Core Member Michael Allan Institutional Representative and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2020 ii © 2020 Laura E Strait This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Laura Strait Doctor of Philosophy School of Journalism and Communication September 2020 Title: Occupying a Third Place: Pro-Life Feminism, Legible Politics, and the Edge of Women's Liberation This dissertation reads pro-life feminism as a break from traditional public perceptions of feminist thought. Through a variety of methodological analyses, it engages three case studies to answer (1) How does pro-life feminism persist as a movement and idea? And (2) What does the existence of pro-life feminists mean for the discursive boundaries of pro-choice feminism? This project included archival research on major feminist, anti-feminist, and pro-life feminist organizations, as well as long-form interviews with founding members of the pro-life feminist organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • 'BN Pays RM1.2Mil for Anti-Anwar Propaganda in US' Malaysiakini.Com March 2, 2013
    'BN pays RM1.2mil for anti-Anwar propaganda in US' MalaysiaKini.com March 2, 2013 BN or its associates have allegedly paid several opinion writers to write propaganda articles for mainstream US publications, which US-based online news portal BuzzFeed said is focused on PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim. The revelation was made after Joshua Trevino (right), described as a conservative pundit, filed a compulsory disclosure on Feb 24 under a US law that requires foreign agents to register themselves. The document has been posted on the US Department of Justice’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (Fara) website. The seven-page document reveals that lobbying companies Apco Worldwide, David All Group and FBC Media had engaged Trevino between May 2008 and April 2011 to act on behalf of the “government of Malaysia, its ruling party, or interests closely aligned with either”. He was paid a total of US$389,724.70 (about RM1.2 million) and a trip to Kuala Lumpur for his work, which included blogging on the now-defunct websites malaysiamatters.com, malaysiawatcher.com, and commissioning the works of 10 opinion writers, some of whom are known to be pro-Israel. However, Trevino, then the director of consultant group Trevino Strategies and Media Inc, claimed in the document that the writers had editorial independence and the publication of their work is not subject to his or his client’s prior approval. "To be blunt with you, and I think the filing is clear about this, it was a lot looser than a typical PR (public relation) operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Stuff That Dreams Are Made of Tentative Budget for Belvidere In
    www.boonecountyjournal.com In Our 18th Year 815-544-4430 The Boone County Journal April 4 th., 2014 1 FREE COUNTY LOCAL NEWS, OPINION & HISTORY Real Journalism for a Real Democracy www.boonecountyjournal.com Published Every Friday • April 4th., 2014 • Vol 18 • Issue 49 No. 933 Stuff that Dreams Are Made Of By James Middleton The last line of dialogue in the 1942 classic film, The Maltese Falcon, ends with the answer to a question. The film tells the story of four people pursuing a priceless artifact and a police sergeant asks the star of the film, Humphrey Bogart, what was all the noise about a ceramic falcon. Bogart replied, “It’s the stuff that dreams are made of.” A similar response could follow a question, “What’s all of the noise about the Eiffel Tower?” Part of the noise heard now is caused by the celebration of the 125th Anniversary of the finish of the Tower. The last step in the construction of the Tower named for the engineer Gustave Eiffel who built the Tower, was the installation of a cupola that occurred on March 15, 1889. The idea of erecting a metallic tower was conceived by two senior design engineers from the firm of Compágnie des Etablissements Eiffel. The Tower was to be the centerpiece of the 1889 Exposition Universelle. The construction of the Tower occurred at the Champ de Mars in Paris on the banks of the Seine River. Maurice Koechil, one of the engineers began making sketches in May of 1884 for what he wanted to call the “great pylon.” He imagined the Tower being built with a wide base that would climb and narrow to a point that would be constructed from lattice iron.
    [Show full text]
  • Ad Claims Truth I’M Tom Cotton
    Pryor For Senate Fact Check: Cotton Goose Ad October 6th, 2013 Ad Claims Truth I’m Tom Cotton. I approve this message Voice Over: PolitiFact: Claim That A Senator Cast The Deciding Vote Was Rated “Mostly What’s good for the goose False.” According to PolitiFact, “The 60 Plus Association says that Florida Sen. Bill ought to be good for the Nelson cast the ‘deciding vote’ for health care. The health care law required 60 votes, so gander Nelson's vote was crucial -- as were the other 59 votes. But describing Nelson as the But not in Washington ‘deciding vote’ suggests he had some extraordinarily powerful role, and that’s not the Mark Pryor cast the case. Nelson had cautiously been a supporter for months as he tried to amend the law. deciding vote to make you We rate this claim Mostly False.” Nelson was 43rd vote cast in support of the bill. live under Obamacare [PolitiFact, 6/6/12] Graphic: Senator Ben Nelson Was 60th Vote To Break Filibuster Of Affordable Care Act. What’s good for the According to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, “Then there's this to consider: Before the votes goose…ought to be good for were taken, Democrats and Republicans kept a count of supporters and opponents, and the gander Democrats could only round up 59 proponents to end debate -- until Ben Nelson of Nebraska agreed to join in. News coverage on that day, Dec. 19, 2009, described Nelson But not in Washington. the crucial 60th vote to break the filibuster. Never mind that "N," for Nelson, is in the middle of the alphabet, and Nelson's actual roll call votes put him there, not 60th.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2015 Sunday Morning Talk Show Data
    November 2015 Sunday Morning Talk Show Data November 1, 2015 26 men and 9 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: 4 men and 2 women Jeb Bush (M) Rep. Paul Ryan (M) Matt Bai (M) David Brooks (M) Helene Cooper (F) Anne Gearan (F) CBS's Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer: 6 men and 1 woman Sen. Marco Rubio (M) Rep. Paul Ryan (M) Rep. Steny Hoyer (M) Peggy Noonan (F) Jamelle Bouie (M) Jonathan Martin (M) Jeffrey Goldberg (M) ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos: 5 men and 2 women Ben Carson (M) Carly Fiorina (F) Rep. Paul Ryan (M) Sara Fagen (F) Van Jones (M) Hugh Hewitt (M) Joe Klien (M) CNN's State of the Union with Candy Crowley: 5 men and 2 women Gov. John Kasich (M) Fmr. Speaker John Boehner (M) Sen. Paul Ryan (M) Rep. Marsha Blackman (F) Rep. Keith Ellison (M) Ben Ginsberg (M) Neera Tanden (F) Fox News' Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: 6 men and 2 women Carly Fiorina (F) Sen. Lindsey Graham (M) Sen. Paul Ryan (M) Fmr. Gov. George Pataki (M) George Will (M) Ron Fournier (M) Liz Cheney (F) Fmr. Sen. Evan Bayh (M) November 8, 2015 34 men and 10 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: 5 men and 4 women Carly Fiorina (F) Senator Bernie Sanders (M) Donald Trump (M) Sen. Dianne Feinstein (F) Michael Leiter (M) Marc Caputo (M) Hugh Hewitt (M) Gwen Ifill (F) Rachel Maddow (F) CBS's Face the Nation with John Dickerson: 6 men and 2 women Ben Carson (M) Donald Trump (M) Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Flip-Flops, Double Standards, and Other Political Sins: a Citizen’S Guide to Hypocrisy in Politics
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: FLIP-FLOPS, DOUBLE STANDARDS, AND OTHER POLITICAL SINS: A CITIZEN’S GUIDE TO HYPOCRISY IN POLITICS Jason Port Stonerook, Doctor of Philosophy, 2020 Dissertation directed by: Professor Karol Soltan Department of Government and Politics People detest hypocrisy, and one of the reasons people hold politics in such low regard is that politics appears rife with hypocrisy. The proliferation of hypocrisy in politics can leave many feeling disenchanted and cynical about political affairs. Yet even those with a strong aversion to political hypocrisy are likely to admit there are occasions when an act that has been characterized as hypocritical is actually acceptable in politics. In some cases, the offense of hypocrisy may not be very serious, or conditioned by circumstances; in other cases, the accusation may not even be valid. This study examines the question of when hypocrisy is more or less acceptable in politics. This issue is explored through a series of case studies drawn from events that occurred in American politics between 2014-2016, an era characterized by high political polarization, high-stakes showdowns between congressional Republicans and the Democratic administration of President Barack Obama, the 2016 presidential primaries, and 2016 presidential election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. The study is organized by type, with a focus on basic violations of principle; logical inconsistencies; double standards involving partisan competition; discrepancies between the public affairs of public officials and their private lives; and flip-flops. The study finds that the most useful and powerful accusations of hypocrisy are those that effectively assert that a political figure has inappropriately prioritized narrow partisan concerns over a broader commitment to principles related to democratic norms, the exercise of civic virtue, and public-spiritedness.
    [Show full text]