DOCSLIB.ORG

LAWS 2018 – Pril

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LAWS 2018 – Pril LAWS 2018 – PrIL Meta-Scaffold 1. Personal Jurisdiction a. Bases for Jurisdiction i. Presence of Defendant ii. Submission by Defendant iii. Service Elsewhere in Australia – SEPA iv. Service in New Zealand – TTPA v. Service Overseas – ‘long-arm’ provisions b. Discretionary Non-Exercise of Jurisdiction i. Mandatory Law ii. Foreign Jurisdiction Clauses iii. Forum non conveniens – ‘clearly inappropriate forum’ iv. Intra-Australian Cases – the cross-vesting scheme v. Trans-Tasman proceedings – ‘more appropriate forum’ c. Anti-Suit Injunctions 2. Choice of Law a. Mortensen’s Choice of Law method i. Identify Conflict of Laws ii. Classify (characterise) Subject Matter iii. Classify: Substantive vs Procedural Law iv. Identify Choice of Law Rule v. Apply Law of the Cause – including foreign choice of law rules: renvoi b. Identifying a Conflict of Laws c. Characterising the Subject Matter d. Substantive vs Procedural Law: classification e. Application of Law of the Cause: renvoi issues f. Torts: applicable law – lex loci delicti g. Equitable + Other Non-contractual obligations h. Contracts: applicable law – proper law of the contract i. Foreign Law i. Ascertaining Foreign Law ii. Exclusion of Foreign Law 1. Penal and Revenue Laws 2. Government Interests 3. Forum Public Policy 3. Foreign Judgments a. Enforcement at Common Law i. Jurisdiction in International Sense ii. Final and Conclusive Judgment iii. Judgment for Fixed Sum iv. Identity v. Defences b. Enforcement in Equity c. Statutory Registration of Foreign Judgments – Foreign Judgments Acts 1991 d. New Zealand Judgments – TTPA e. Enforcement of Judgments within Australia f. International Arbitration 1. Introduction (a) Concepts and Persistent Issues 1. What is Private International Law? • Private international law is the body of principles, rules and policies that determine how a foreign element in a legal problem should be resolved. • Can often be referred to as ‘conflict of laws’ – it is not about international law per se, but rather it is about the international elements of the domestic law of Australia and NSW. 2. What is a ‘foreign element’? • There are a number of parts of a case that can involve a foreign element and therefore enliven private international law issues, including: • Foreign party to a case • Event occurring internationally • Property located overseas • Choice of law/governing law clauses in contracts • When litigation could occur in Australia or a foreign jurisdiction • Foreign elements can apply at any point in the process of litigation: • From originating process and service, to the trial, judgment, and enforcement • Interlocutory proceedings – e.g. applications for stay, anti-suit injunctions • Application of foreign law in Australia 3. Strategy in Litigation – private international law issues, especially when multiple jurisdictions may be able to exercise jurisdiction over a matter, can give rise to strategic choices about where best to litigate. For example, one jurisdiction may bar jurisdictions on the basis of a statute of limitations, another might give better remedies, or the location of the defendant’s assets in one jurisdiction may make recovery easier by the plaintiff. 4. 3 Core Issues – private international law essentially deals with 3 core issues: • Jurisdiction – does the court have the authority to decide a matter? • Choice of Law – whether Australian courts may apply the law of another jurisdiction – this is the principle of Australian law which determines the substantive law which will govern a case. This is becoming more relevant given globalisation. • Foreign Judgments – recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. 5. Terminology • ‘foreign’ – has a broad meaning in private international law in that it can refer to both other countries and states outside NSW as ‘foreign jurisdictions’ – McKain v Miller • law areas – each state, territory (internal and external), and the Commonwealth is a distinct ‘law area’ or jurisdiction in Australia: • common law – Australia has one common law system of precedent – Farah v Say-Dee • legislation – statute naturally varies between law areas • forum – place where a dispute may be heard (can refer to a law or a court of a law area) • lex fori – law of the forum (e.g. NSW court applying NSW law) • lex loci delicti – the law of the place of the wrong (i.e. where a tort/crime is committed) • forum non conveniens – an inconvenient forum • lex causae – the law applicable to the settlement of a particular case • lex situs – place where the property is located • ‘proper law of the x’ – the system of law governing the x (e.g. the law governing the contract) 2. Personal Jurisdiction PART A – Bases for Jurisdiction In order to bring a case against a defendant, the plaintiff needs to establish a basis for personal jurisdiction. Depending on the circumstances and the location of the defendant, a different basis of jurisdiction will apply. A few introductory points: • Part A is about whether a court has the competence (jurisdiction) to hear and determine a matter with a foreign element – however: even if the court does have such competence, it can still decline to exercise that jurisdiction (Part B). • Courts need to have personal jurisdiction in order to make binding orders on the defendant – without personal jurisdiction then there would be no point in exercising jurisdiction. • If the plaintiff cannot establish a basis for jurisdiction, then the matter cannot proceed – this would occur by an application to set aside the originating process or an application to set aside service of the originating process – UCPR, r 12.11 (a) Common Law – Presence of Defendant 1. Individuals – the defendant is an individual, the following rules apply: a. Presence as Basis for Jurisdiction – at common law, the primary basis for the court’s jurisdiction is the service of the originating process on the defendant when the defendant is within the territorial jurisdiction of the court – i.e. NSWSC will have jurisdiction if defendant is in NSW at the time of service – Gosper v Sawyer; Laurie v Carroll i. Timing of Service 1. Present at Service – if the defendant is present in the jurisdiction when the originating process is served then jurisdiction is established – Laurie v Carroll 2. Fleeting Presence OK – even if the defendant is only in the jurisdiction for a short period, if service is affected in that period then jurisdiction is established (so long as it is not vexatious, oppressive, or an abuse of process) – HRH Maharanee v Wildenstein (Ascot Races) 3. Leave After Service – if the defendant leaves the jurisdiction after being served, jurisdiction is still established – Razelos v Razelos 4. Leave before Service – if the defendant leaves the jurisdiction after the writ of service is issued but before service can be affected, then no jurisdiction will be established – Laurie v Carroll a. Exception: evasion – if evidence suggests that the defendant was aware that the writ had been issued but left the jurisdiction to evade service then the court may grant an order for substituted service which will allow jurisdiction even if the individual has left the country – Joye v Sheahan (left Australia, but knew through solicitors of writ being issued) ii. Purpose for Being in Jurisdiction – general rule: the purpose or reason for the defendant being in the jurisdiction usually is inconsequential for the purposes of service – presence is the sole factor – Perrett v Robinson 1. Exception: fraud/coercion – service will not give rise to jurisdiction if the defendant has been tricked, fraudulently enticed, or coerced into the jurisdiction by the plaintiff to be served – Perrett v Robinson 2. Perrett v Robinson – although tort committed in NT, plaintiff wanted to claim in Qld. Plaintiff drove cooperative defendant to Qld for service. Defendant’s insurer unsuccessfully sought to have service set aside on basis of fraud – no fraud because defendant came willingly. b. Personal Service under UCPR i. When is Personal Service Required? – an originating process must be personally served on the defendant for proceedings in all courts except the Local Court – UCPR, r 10.20(2)(a) ii. How is Service Effected? – personal service is affected by: 1. Normal Service – leaving a copy of the document with the person OR if they don’t accept the document by putting it down in their presence and telling them the nature of the document – r 10.21(1) 3. Choice of Law Part A – Choice of Law Generally General Points about Choice of Law • Australian choice of law rules govern which substantive laws should govern and decide a legal issue where there is more than jurisdiction involved. • Australian courts will generally apply the law of the forum (lex fori) to decide a dispute; however in some cases with a foreign element an Australian court will apply the law of another law area to decide a dispute. • The ‘applicable law’ (lex causae) is the substantive law that applies to an issue. As per above, an Australian court may apply the lex causae of another jurisdiction to determine a dispute. • An Australian court applies its own choice of law principles to determine what is the applicable law to a dispute or legal issue – the Australian choice of law principles therefore determine what substantive law applies to the issue. • Dispositive vs Indicative Rules – choice of law rules (indicative rules) merely direct the forum court as to which substantive body of rules (dispositive rules) govern the dispute and will therefore determine the outcome – indicative rules do not provide
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Structure of Conflicts Rules
    CHAPTER 2 Structure of Conflicts Rules I. THE PARTS OF THE RULE NTELLIGENT application or development of con­ flicts rules requires full awareness of the two parts of I which these rules are necessarily composed. Thus, al­ though it need not exactly conform to the example, a typical conflicts rule runs as, for instance, section 29 5 of the Re­ statement: ( 1) The validity of a trust of movables created by a will ( 2) is determined by the law of the testator's domicil at the time of his death. (Numbers added.) The first part of the rule defines its object, that is, certain operative facts/ the legal consequences of which are deter­ mined in the second part. From another point of view the first part raises, and the second part answers, a legal ques­ tion. In comparison with ordinary legal rules, there is one, a fundamental, difference. The legal effects of an ordinary rule of law are fully indicated; the question raised is immedi­ ately solved by commanding or prohibiting or authorizing certain conduct. ("Material," "substantive," "internal" rules, in German, Sachnormen.) In contrast, conflicts rules decide only which state shall give such immediate solution. The specific quality of these rules resides therefore in the second part that declares the municipal law to which the question should be referred or "connected" (in German, angekniipft) or, in other words, prescribes the legislative 1 German: "Tatbestand," translated by LEA MERIGGI, Revue 1933, 201 at 205, n. 1, into Latin: "substratum" (subject matter); Italian: "presupposto" (premise). 47 INTRODUCTION domain in which the question should be "localized." (There is no point in arguing which mode of thinking represented by these expressions is preferable.) An essential element of con­ flicts rules, therefore, is the indication of a "connecting fac­ tor" or "point of contact" (A nkniipfungspunkt, point de rattachement) 2-the testator's domicil as of the time of death in the case above, or in other cases the situs of prop­ erty, the place where a contract was concluded or where it is to be performed, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict of Laws in Florida 1957-1963
    University of Miami Law Review Volume 18 Number 2 Article 2 12-1-1963 Conflict of Laws in Florida 1957-1963 S. A. Bayitch Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Recommended Citation S. A. Bayitch, Conflict of Laws in Florida 1957-1963, 18 U. Miami L. Rev. 269 (1963) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol18/iss2/2 This Leading Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONFLICT OF LAWS IN FLORIDA 1957-1963 S. A. BAYITCH As stated in a recent opinion, "[t]he field of conflict of laws, the most underdeveloped in our jurisprudence from a practical standpoint, is just now breaking loose from the ritualistic theory of the last century."' It is true, of course, that traditional doctrines only rarely meet demands arising in a rapidly developing society. In this country, the transition of economic, social and political life from the intrastate level to interstate, if not international dimensions, and the vanishing significance of state lines in everyday life have profoundly changed propositions upon which our conflicts law has developed. And even though Florida may not be found among the new avant-garde, the work of her courts and legislatures bear evidence of a solid determination not to lag far behind.2 GENERAL PROBLEMS Florida courts only rarely tackle problems involving general rules of conflicts law.
    [Show full text]
  • Incidental (Preliminary) Question
    912 912 ENCYclopedia OF Private international law Incidental (preliminary) question I. General remarks Lawyers commonly find that a rule of law can attach specific effects to an existing legal status or relationship. When a court or an administra­ tive authority is required to take a decision on a legal question involving the application of such a rule, it may be required to take first a decision on the presupposed status or relationship, if its existence or validity is disputed. In such circum­ stances, it is common to say that the decision on the ‘main’ question (ie the main object of the decision) depends on the decision of a ‘prelim­ inary’ or ‘incidental question’ (question préal- able in French, Vorfrage in German). Take, for example, a contentious → succes­ sion case in which a court is required to take a decision on the division of the estate among the heirs. If the applicable rules on intestate suc­ cession confer to the surviving spouse the right to a part of the estate, it may be that the exist­ ence or validity of the deceased’s → marriage is disputed: this is the case if some other poten­ tial heirs allege that the marriage was null and void or that it had been terminated by a divorce (→ Divorce and personal separation). In such a case, the question of the existence and validity of the marriage is not the main object of the proceedings; nevertheless the court will have to decide this issue incidentally in order to deter­ mine whether the surviving spouse can inherit part of the estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in the Area of International Family Law in East Asia: Focus on International Divorce and Child Abduction
    Recent Developments in the Area of International Family Law in East Asia: Focus on International Divorce and Child Abduction Associate Professor HUANG Renting(黄軔霆) Faculty of Law, Tezukayama University I. Introduction Stepping into the 21th century, East Asia countries have seen dramatic changes in the legislation of private international law. Korea, Japan and China revised their former private international law rules and enacted new acts in 2001, 2007 and 2011 respectively (hereinafter as KPIL, JPIL and CPIL respectively).1 I totally agree with Prof. Suk’ suggestion, that in order to archive the long term goal for the unification or harmonization of the PIL rules in the Region, more practical approach at the moment would be for the PIL experts to engage in more in depth comparative analysis of the PILAs and their actual application by the courts in the Region. Thus, in my presentation, I will discuss the possibility of harmonization in dealing with international family matters in the Region, with emphasis on international divorce and child abduction, after conducting a comparative analysis of PIL rules as well as related practices in and out of courts. II. A Brief Survey of the PIL rules In this part, a brief survey of the PIL rules and some related practices on * This is a draft paper prepared for the presentation at the Conference of the International Law Association of Japan in Shizuoka on October 12, 2013. 1 Taiwan has also enacted its new Private International Law Act, “Law Concerning the Application of Law for Civil Matters Involving Foreign Element”, which has become effective as of May 26,, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Bar Review [Vol
    THE CANADIAN BAR. REVIEW VOL. XIX MAY, 1941 No. 5 RENVOI AND THE LAW OF THE DOMICILE § 1 . Rejection of Renvoi, .Theory of Partial Renvoi and Theory of Total Renvoi § 2. Consequences of the Theory of Total Renvoi § 3. Unitary and Composite Systems of Law § 4. The National Law of a British Subject § 5. General Observations and 'Exceptions § 6. Postscript ; Renvoi and Characterization In the latest English case on the doctrine of the -renvoi,l an English court, having found that the de cujus was domiciled at the time of her . death in Italy, decided that the proper law governing the succession to her movables situated in England was the law of Eire: . This choice of law seems -on its face to be so lacking in any real or substantial foundation that it is worth while to consider whether there are any grounds, prac- tical or theoretical, that can possibly justify the result reached. § 1. REJECTION OF RENVOI, THEORY OF PARTIAL RENVOI AND THEORY OF TOTAL. RENVOI If, with regard to a particular question arising in a court of country X, a conflict rule2 of the law of X refers to the law of country Y (in its character as the lex domicilii, or as the case may be), and if, with regard to a similar question, the corre- -sponding conflict rule of the law of Y refers to the law of X, I In re O'Keefe, Poingdestre v. Sherman, [1940] Ch. 124 . The judgment as reported in the Law Reports differs in some respects from the earlier version reported in 162 L.T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Qualification, Classification, Or Characterization Problem in the Conflict of Laws
    THE QUALIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, OR CHARACTERIZATION PROBLEM IN THE CONFLICT OF LAWS By ERNEST G. LORENZENI I. THEF, problem in the Conflict of Laws which today is known on the continent as the problem of "qualification" and in recent Anglo-American literature as that of "classification" or "characterization" was brought to the attention of students of the Conflict of Laws fifty years ago. In the very year of the founding of the YALE LAW JOURNAL, Franz Kahn published an article in Jhering's Jahrbicher1 in which he pointed out that even if the rules of the Conflict of Laws in the different countries were the same, identity of results in individual cases would not follow because of latent conflicts inherent in the different systems of law. Bartin dealt with the same problem in 1897, under the title De l'im- possibilitj d'arriver a la suppression difiniiive des conflits de lois, ap- parently unaware of the fact that Kahn had written on the subject before him. Bartin spoke of the problem as one of "qualification," and since that time the problem has been known on the continent by that name.- There is no agreement among the writers concerning the type of ques- tions properly belonging to a discussion of the qualification problem. Some use the term in a very broad sense and others in a narrower sense. I shall deal with the following classes of cases: (1) The first class is one in which the fact situation is characterized under the law of the forum in a way different from that in which it is characterized under the lex causae- the law of the state or country with which it is connected.
    [Show full text]
  • The Choice of Applicable Law in International Arbitration, 9 Hastings Int'l & Comp
    Hastings International and Comparative Law Review Volume 9 Article 2 Number 2 Winter 1986 1-1-1986 The hoiceC of Applicable Law in International Arbitration Vitek Danilowicz Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_international_comparative_law_review Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Vitek Danilowicz, The Choice of Applicable Law in International Arbitration, 9 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 235 (1986). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_international_comparative_law_review/vol9/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Choice of Applicable Law in International Arbitration By VITEK DANILOWICZ LL.M. with Distinction, Uniwersytet Wroclawski (Poland), 1977 Diploma in InternationalLaw and Development with Distinction,Institute of Social Stud- ies (The Netherlands), 1982; J.D., LouisianaState University, 1985; LL.M., Louisiana State University, 1985: Associate, Vinson & Elkins, Houston, Texas. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................. 236 PART I: THE CHOICE OF THE LAW GOVERNING THE ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS .................. 238 A. The Scope of the Lex Arbitri ............................... 238 B. The Distinction between Substance and Procedure in International Arbitration ................................... 240 C. The State Interest in the Choice of the Lex Arbitri .......... 243 D. The Choice of the Lex Arbitri by the Arbitrator ............ 251 1. Lex Fori ............................................... 251 2. The Legal System "Significantly Related" to the Dispute 253 3. Denationalized Lex Arbitri .............................. 254 Conclusions ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Murakami Takako V Wiryadi Louise Maria and Others
    Murakami Takako v Wiryadi Louise Maria and Others [2008] SGHC 47 Case Number : Suit 219/2008, SIC 4366/2007 Decision Date : 01 April 2008 Tribunal/Court : High Court Coram : Andrew Ang J Counsel Name(s) : Devinder K Rai and Subramanian Pillai (Acies Law Corporation) for the plaintiff; Yeap Poh Leong Andre SC, Wong Soon Peng Adrian and Chan Wai Kit Darren Dominic (Rajah & Tann LLP) for the defendant Parties : Murakami Takako — Wiryadi Louise Maria; Ryuji Murakami; Bahari Sjamsjur; Ryuzo Murakami Civil Procedure – Amendments – Estoppel – Proceedings commenced in foreign court – Whether issue estoppel or cause of action estoppel barring amendments to statement of claim Conflict of Laws – Jurisdiction – Application to introduce foreign immovables into statement of claim – Distinction between immovables and movables – Whether exception to rule that forum does not have jurisdiction over disputes relating to title of foreign land satisfied – Scope of exception Conflict of Laws – Natural forum – Whether Singapore natural forum for determination of disputes over foreign immovables that arose from ancillary divorce proceedings in Indonesia 1 April 2008 Judgment reserved. Andrew Ang J: Introduction 1 By way of Summons No 4366 of 2007, the plaintiff sought to introduce amendments to her Statement of Claim. The proposed amendments enlarge the scope of the assets covered by the plaintiff’s claims. These claims are based on the assets of one Takashi Murakami Suroso situated in various parts of the world and I had earlier summarised these claims in Murakami Takako v Wiryadi Louise Maria [2007] 1 SLR 1119 at [5] (the appeal from which is reported in Murakami Takako v Wiryadi Louise Maria [2007] 4 SLR 565).
    [Show full text]
  • Litigating the Overseas Activities of Corporations
    Litigating the overseas activities of corporations Geert van Calster Leuven Law; King’s College, London; Monash [email protected] blog at www.gavclaw.com 2 3 4 US: Use of public international law to allow foreign pursuit of corporations in US (federal) courts: the Alien Torts Statute EU: Use of private international law to allow pursuit of corporations in EU (national) courts: the Conflict of Laws 5 US: Alien Torts Statute - ATS “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States”. Alien Tort Statute, Judiciary Act, 1789 The dust of history settled until Filartiga v Pena-Irala (1980): US Second Circuit Court of Appeals Sosa v Alvarez-Machain (2004): in order to qualify for ATS, a plaintiff must provide significant evidence for the violation of well-defined and universally accepted norms of common international law 6 ATS ctd. Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, 2010: same second circuit: due to a perceived lack of precedent in international law, corporations cannot be held liable for violations of customary international law in US courts under ATS litigation (Jacobs) Other circuits were happier to find corporations liable per international law USSC Certiorari: whether and under what circumstances US courts may recognize a cause of action under the Alien Torts Statute, for violations of the law of nations, occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States. (Hereby ignoring the corporate culpability question which actually triggered certiorari) 7 ATS ctd.
    [Show full text]
  • LAW 454 CONFLICTS of LAWS Acorn CHAPTER 1—CHARACTERIZATION
    LAW 454 CONFLICTS OF LAWS Acorn CHAPTER 1—CHARACTERIZATION 3 Basic Questions: A. Jurisdiction: which court has jurisdiction over the matter? Which court will take jurisdiction over the matter? forum non conveniens –can take jurisdiction but under circs of the case there is another forum that is more appropriate in the interest of justice to hear the case B. Choice of Law: which law governs the matter? C. Enforcement: will the judgment be enforceable in other jurisdictions Comity: recognition of one nation’s legal/executive/judicial acts by another -duty regard to international duty & convenience “Choice of Law Rule” -a rule that tells the court which law to apply given the nature of the subject matter -courts determine which law should apply by characterization of the issue lex fori : law of the forum hearing the case lex causae : law of the cause, law to apply once followed the choice of law rule lex situs: law of the place where the property is situated lex loci delicti: law of the place where the tort was committed lex loci celebrationis: law of the place where a marriage is celebrated lex loci contractus: law of the place where a contract was made lex domicilii : law of the place where a party is domiciled There are 7 choice of law rules: 1. torts governed by the place where the tort committed (lex loci delictii) 2. contracts governed by the law the parties intended 3. formalities of marriage are governed by the law of the place where the marriage was celebrated (lex loci celebrationis or lex loci contractus) -once applied with the requirements of getting married then the marriage is recognized in other jurisdictions 4.
    [Show full text]
  • QUALIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, OR CHARACTERIZATION PROBLEM in the CONFLICT of LAWS by ERNEST G
    THE QUALIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, OR CHARACTERIZATION PROBLEM IN THE CONFLICT OF LAWS By ERNEST G. LORENZENt I. THE problem in the Conflict of Laws which today is known on the continent as the problem of "qualification" and in recent Anglo-American literature as that of "classification" or "cl1aracterization" was brought to the attention of students of the Conflict of Laws fifty years ago. In the very year of the founding of the YALE LAw JOURNAL, Franz Kahn published an article in Jhering's Iahrbiic/1Cr 1 in which he pointed out that even if the rules of the Conflict of Laws in the different countries were the same, identity of results in individual cases would not follow because of latent conflicts inherent in the different systems of law. Bartin dealt with the same problem in 1897, under the title De l'im­ possibilite d'arriver a la suppression definitive des conjlits de lois~ ap­ parently unaware of tl1e fact that Kalm l1ad written on tlte subject before him. Bartin spoke of the problem as one of "qualification," and since that time the problem has been known on tlte continent by that name.2 There is no agreement among the writers concerning tlte type of ques­ tions properly belonging to a discussion of the qualification problem. Some use the term in a very broad sense and others in a narrower sense. I shall deal with the following classes of cases: ( 1) The first class is one in which the fact situation is cl1aracterized under the law of the forum in a way different from that in which it is characterized under the lex causae- tl1e law of tl1e state or country with which it is connected.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Intervention Vis-À-Vis Competence of Arbitral Tribunal Jayanth Balakrishna LL.M
    NJA – Session 5, 15.12.18 Jurisdictional Issues: Court Intervention vis-à-vis Competence of Arbitral Tribunal Jayanth Balakrishna LL.M. (International Arbitration, Global Energy and Environmental Law) U.S.A., LL.B. (Hons.) U.K., M.C.E. (Water Resources and Environmental Engg.) U.S.A., B.E. (Civil Engg.) Bangalore, formerly licensed as Professional Engineer (P.E.) U.S.A. 1 Conflict of Laws International commercial arbitration (ICA) involves more than one system of law or legal rules. They may include The law governing the agreement to arbitrate and its performance: • may be set out in the arbitration agreement (to settle future disputes) or in a purpose made submission agreement (to settle existing disputes). When seat or place of arbitration is India and the arbitration is not an ICA, the tribunal is required to apply Indian law in deciding the dispute. In the case of an ICA the rules of law designated by the parties is applied as applicable to the substance of the dispute. • Courts have held that the proper law of the arbitration agreement is the same as the proper law of the contract – or could also be the same as the law of the seat • the ‘separability’ presumption postulates 2 separate agreements which could be governed by 2 separate set of laws. • A valid agreement must be in writing; a defined legal relationship contractual or otherwise - may be governed by principles of tort liability rather than contract; whether the dispute is a subject matter capable of arbitration (arbitrability); affected by both NY Convention and national law, …The lex arbitri is not necessarily only procedural governing the matters internal to the arbitration such as appointment of arbitrators, but also the external relationship between the arbitration and the courts, and also the broader external relationship between arbitration and the public policy of that place including matters of arbitrability.
    [Show full text]