DOCSLIB.ORG

Conflicts Between Choice of Law Rules and Recognition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conflicts Between Choice of Law Rules and Recognition CONFLICTS BETWEEN CHOICE OF LAW RULES AND RECOGNITION OF JUDGMENTS RULES IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO CASES INVOLVING DETERMINATION OF STATUS A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the London School of Economics, University of London. by Rhona G. Schuz M.A., LL.M. (Cantab.) 1 UMI Number: U062779 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U062779 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 TReses F 3GOQ. Library British Library of P;viticsl and Economic S c ie n ^ ABSTRACT This thesis presents a novel approach to part of the problem of the Incidental Question in the Conflict of Laws. Only cases where the answer to what has been called the main question depends on recognition of a foreign judgment (the so called incidental or preliminary question) are included. The problem is analysed as involving a conflict between two different types of conflicts rules i.e. choice of law rules and recognition rules. The thesis examines whether this conflict can be satisfactorily solved by a global preference for either of these rules. Whilst many writers have considered the theoretical base for the conflict of laws, none has yet specifically compared the rationales for choice of law rules and recognition rules in order to determine whether as a matter of principle one type of rule should be preferred to the other rule. This requires a fresh perspective. After rejecting the global solution, the thesis proceeds to examine how a result selecting approach might be applied to the present conflict of rules. After a brief survey of different result selecting approaches, it is concluded that the most appropriate approach in the present conflict of rules context is the construction of specific result orientated rules for each particular category of case. The desired result should be dictated by the policy of the forum, since in fact the conflict is between two conflict rules of the forum. 2 A number of specific topics (including validity of remarriage and matrimonial property rights) concerning recognition of status judgments are considered in depth. The methodology adopted is as follows:- a) . The particular circumstances in which the 'conflict of rules' problem is likely to arise in relation to the particular issue is explained. b). The various possible 'choice of rule' rules which might be adopted for the particular issue are considered. c) . The policy of English law in relation to the particular issue is ascertained and the 'choice of rule' rule which most closely gives effect to that policy recommended. The thesis contributes to jurisprudence of Private International Law in three main ways:- 1. The understanding of conflicts between different types of conflict rules is of fundamental importance to the whole structure of Private International Law. This thesis shows that this problem is of more significance than previously thought. 2. Whilst writers have adopted a functional approach to the incidental question, none have attempted to construct a series of rules based on forum policy. 3. There has been no previous attempt to identify forum (here English) policy in relation to the particular issues chosen. 3 CONTENTS PART 1: BACKGROUND AND STRUCTURE OF THE THESIS CHAPTER 1: PRELIMINARY ISSUES AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE THESIS I. THE SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM OUTLINED 11 A. BASIC PRINCIPLES 11 B. DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN THE 'CONFLICT OF RULES' SITUATION AND THE 'PURE RECOGNITION' SITUATION 12 C. DECISIONS AFFECTING STATUS 13 D. NOTATION AND TERMINOLOGY 15 II. RECOGNITION RULES 16 A. IN ACTIONS IN PERSONAM 16 B. MATRIMONIAL DECREES. 21 III. THE PROBLEM ILLUSTRATED 28 IV. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TRADITIONALANALYSIS AND THE CONFLICT OF RULES ANALYSIS 38 A. THE TRADITIONAL ANALYSIS 38 B. THE 'CONFLICT OF RULES' ANALYSIS 42 V SOLUTIONS TO THE 'CONFLICT OF RULES' PROBLEM 44 VI FORUM DECREES 45 VII THE APPLICATION OF THE CHOICE RULE AND RENVOI 49 VIII BIAS IN FAVOUR OF RECOGNITION RULES? 55 A. 'PURE RECOGNITION CASES' 56 B. RECENT TRENDS IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 58 PART II: GLOBAL SOLUTIONS CHAPTER 2: GIVING PREFERENCE TO CHOICE OF LAW RULES I. INTRODUCTION 62 II: THE THEORIES 62 A. COMITY 64 1. Reciprocity 64 2. Judicial Courtesy 65 3. Business Efficacy 67 4. Conclusion About Comity 68 B. VESTED RIGHTS 69 C. JUSTICE TO THE PARTIES 71 1. What do we mean by justice? 71 2. Jaffey and the Principle of 'Reasonable Expectations' 73 3. Can 'Justice' Support A Global Preference for Choice Rules? 80 III: CONCLUSION FROM THE THEORIES 82 CHAPTER 3: GIVING PREFERENCE TO RECOGNITION RULES I . INTRODUCTION 83 II. THE THEORIES 85 A. ESTOPPEL PER REM JUDICATAM 85 B. COMITY 88 1. Reciprocity 89 2. Judicial Courtesy 94 3. Business Efficacy 95 4 C. THE DOCTRINE OF OBLIGATION 97 1. Acceptance of the Doctrine 97 2. Basis of the Doctrine. 100 D. IMPLIED CONTRACT 103 E. AVOIDANCE OF LIMPING MARRIAGES 104 III 'NON-RECOGNITION RULES' 105 A. INTRODUCTION 105 B. NON-MATRIMONIAL CASES 107 1. The Problem Explained 107 2. Rationale for the 'Non-Recognition Rules' 108 C. MATRIMONIAL CAUSES 114 1. The Problem Explained 114 2. Rationale for the 'Non-Recognition Rules' 115 IV. CONCLUSION 128 CHAPTER 4: GIVING PREFERENCE TO THE RULE WHICH IS STATUTORY I. INTRODUCTION 129 II. THEORETICAL BASIS 131 A. THE RATIONALES 131 B. 'NON-RECOGNITION RULES' 136 III RESULTS 137 IV. CONCLUSION 138 PART III: SPECIFIC SOLUTIONS CHAPTER 5 : THE RESULT-ORIENTED METHODOLOGY I . INTRODUCTION 140 I. THE RATIONALE FOR RESULT SELECTION 141 A. CRITICISMS OF MECHANICAL RULES 141 B. PUBLIC POLICY AS AN ESCAPE ROUTE 142 III. RESULT-ORIENTED RULES 147 A. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AD HOC RESULT SELECTION AND RESULT-ORIENTATION. 147 B. EXAMPLES OF RESULT-ORIENTED RULES 149 C. CRITIQUE OF RESULT-ORIENTED RULES 153 D. ASCERTAINMENT OF POLICY 156 E. CONCLUSION IN RELATION TO RESULT ORIENTATION 158 IV METHODOLOGY 159 CHAPTER 6: CAPACITY TO REMARRY I SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM 162 A. INTRODUCTION 162 B. RECOGNITION OF DECREES IN OTHER COUNTRIES 163 1. Commonwealth countries 163 2. The United States 167 3. Civil Law Countries 170 4. Countries not Providing for Divorce 172 C. CHOICE OF LAW RULE FOR CAPACITY TO MARRY 173 II POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS 175 A. PREFER THE CHOICE RULE 175 1. Theoretical Basis 175 5 2. Authority 177 3. Results 179 B. PREFER THE RECOGNITION RULE 182 1. Theoretical Basis 182 2. Authority 184 3. Results 191 C. A 'DIFFERENTIAL RULE7 194 1. Introduction 194 2. The Possible Bases for Differentiation 196 3. Conclusion about 'Differential Rules7 205 D. PREFER THE RULE WHICH UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF THE MARRIAGE 205 III POLICY 207 A. THE PRESENT LAW 207 B. THE LAW COMMISSION7 S PROPOSALS 210 IV APPLICATION OF POLICY 212 V RECOMMENDATION 215 CHAPTER 7: SUCCESSION BY SPOUSES I. SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM 216 A. INTRODUCTION 216 B. CHOICE OF LAW RULES 217 C: DISCRETIONARY FAMILY PROVISION SCHEMES 219 D. SECOND MARRIAGES 222 II POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS 226 A. PREFER THE CHOICE RULE 226 1. Theoretical Basis 226 2. Authority 227 3. Results 230 4. The Doctrine of Preclusion 231 B. PREFER THE RECOGNITION RULE 242 1. Theoretical Basis 242 2. Authority 243 3. Results 244 C. THE 'DIFFERENTIAL RULE7 249 1. Theoretical Basis 240 2. Results 249 D. UPHOLDING SUCCESSION RIGHTS 249 III POLICY 250 A. WILLS 250 B. PROVISION FOR DEPENDANTS 252 1. The scheme of the 1975 Act 252 2. Former Spouses 253 3. The rationale behind discretionary family provision for spouses and former spouses 255 4. Fixed Share Schemes 257 C. INTESTACY 258 1. The present scheme 258 2. The Policy Behind Intestacy Provision for Spouses 259 IV APPLICATION OF POLICY 261 A. WILLS 262 1. Where the testator is the other 7 spouse7 262 2. The testator is a third party 262 6 B. PROVISION FOR DEPENDENTS 264 1. Discretionary Schemes 264 2. Fixed Share Schemes 265 C. INTESTACY 267 V RECOMMENDATIONS 268 CHAPTER 8: MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY I. THE SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM 269 A. INTRODUCTION 269 B. THE CHOICE OF LAW RULE 270 C. DIFFERENT TYPES OF MATRIMONIAL REGIME 275 1. Separate Property Regimes 275 2. Community of Property Regime 276 3. Deferred Community Regimes 279 4. Discretionary Distribution Schemes 290 D. MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY AND SUCCESSION 296 E. SECOND MARRIAGES 297 II POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS 298 A. APPLY THE CHOICE RULE 298 1. Theoretical Basis 298 2. Authority 302 3. Results 302 B. APPLY THE RECOGNITION RULE 305 1. Theoretical Basis 305 2. Results 306 C. THE 'DIFFERENTIAL RULE' 308 D. UPHOLDING MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 309 III POLICY 309 A. OVERVIEW OF ENGLISH DOMESTIC LAW 309 B. ENGLISH LAW APPROACH TO THE ISSUES IN QUESTION 312 1. Sharing of Post-Decree Acquisitions 312 2. Realisation 315 IV APPLICATION OF POLICY 317 A. SHARING OF POST-DECREE ACQUISITIONS 317 B. REALISATION 319 V RECOMMENDATION 319 CHAPTER 9 : TORTS I THE SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM 320 A. INTRODUCTION 320 B. THE CHOICE OF LAW RULE 321 C. INTER-SPOUSAL IMMUNITY 323 D. WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS 327 II POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS 329 A. PREFER THE CHOICE RULE 329 1. Theoretical Basis 329 2. Authority 330 3. Results in relation to Inter-Spousal Immunity 331 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Structure of Conflicts Rules
    CHAPTER 2 Structure of Conflicts Rules I. THE PARTS OF THE RULE NTELLIGENT application or development of con­ flicts rules requires full awareness of the two parts of I which these rules are necessarily composed. Thus, al­ though it need not exactly conform to the example, a typical conflicts rule runs as, for instance, section 29 5 of the Re­ statement: ( 1) The validity of a trust of movables created by a will ( 2) is determined by the law of the testator's domicil at the time of his death. (Numbers added.) The first part of the rule defines its object, that is, certain operative facts/ the legal consequences of which are deter­ mined in the second part. From another point of view the first part raises, and the second part answers, a legal ques­ tion. In comparison with ordinary legal rules, there is one, a fundamental, difference. The legal effects of an ordinary rule of law are fully indicated; the question raised is immedi­ ately solved by commanding or prohibiting or authorizing certain conduct. ("Material," "substantive," "internal" rules, in German, Sachnormen.) In contrast, conflicts rules decide only which state shall give such immediate solution. The specific quality of these rules resides therefore in the second part that declares the municipal law to which the question should be referred or "connected" (in German, angekniipft) or, in other words, prescribes the legislative 1 German: "Tatbestand," translated by LEA MERIGGI, Revue 1933, 201 at 205, n. 1, into Latin: "substratum" (subject matter); Italian: "presupposto" (premise). 47 INTRODUCTION domain in which the question should be "localized." (There is no point in arguing which mode of thinking represented by these expressions is preferable.) An essential element of con­ flicts rules, therefore, is the indication of a "connecting fac­ tor" or "point of contact" (A nkniipfungspunkt, point de rattachement) 2-the testator's domicil as of the time of death in the case above, or in other cases the situs of prop­ erty, the place where a contract was concluded or where it is to be performed, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Part in the Programme May Be Extended for a Maximum of Two Years
    ACADEMIC NETWORK FOR LEGAL STUDIES ON IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM IN EUROPE A NETWORK FOUNDED WITH THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF THE ODYSSEUS PROGRAMME OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RÉSEAU ACADÉMIQUE D’ÉTUDES JURIDIQUES SUR L’IMMIGRATION ET L’ASILE EN EUROPE UN RESEAU FONDE AVEC LE SOUTIEN FINANCIER DU PROGRAMME ODYSSEUS DE LA COMMISSION EUROPEENNE DIRECTIVE 2001/55 TEMPORARY PROTECTION SYNTHESIS REPORT by GREGOR NOLL & MARKUS GUNNEFLO STUDY ON THE “CONFORMITY CHECKING OF THE TRANSPOSITION BY MEMBER STATES OF 10 EC DIRECTIVES IN THE SECTOR OF ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION” DONE FOR DG JLS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION END 2007(CONTRACT JLS/B4/2006/03) A Network coordinated by the Institute for European Studies Un Réseau coordonné par l'Institut d'Etudes européennes of the / de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles and composed of academics of the following institutions / et composé de membres du corps académique des institutions suivantes: Université catholique de Louvain (B), Universidade Autonoma de Lisboa (P), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (P), Universität Salzburg (A), Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (NL), University of Bristol (UK), Universitaet Konstanz (D), Universitaet Göttingen (D), Universidad Pontificia Comillas de Madrid (E), Università degli Studi di Milano (I), Université de Paris-Sud (F), Université de Pau et des pays de l’Adour (F), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Aarhus Universitet (DK), Umeå Universitet(S), Lunds Universitet (S), Åbo Akademi (FIN), University of Turku (FIN), Eötvös Loránd University (HU), University of Silesia (PL), Mykolas Romeris University (LT), University of Ljubljana (SLO), University of Latvia (LV) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. LIST OF NATIONAL RAPPORTEURS 3 II. GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY 4 III.
    [Show full text]
  • FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations
    FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations by Mr Roderick MACAULEY Criminal law adviser at the Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom Thematic Review of GRECO’s Third Evaluation Round For further information, GRECO Secretariat Directorate General I - Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex Tel.: + 33 (0)3 88 41 30 43 Fax: + 33 (0)3 88 41 39 55 www.coe.int/greco www.coe.int PREMS 67012 FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations by Mr Roderick MACAULEY Criminal Law adviser at the Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom Thematic review of GRECO’s Third Evaluation Round Contents Introduction ........................................................ 5 General themes and observations ...................... 9 Specific Themes ................................................ 20 Public/private distinctions ..................................... 20 Public Official ...................................................... 20 Exercise of functions ............................................ 23 Autonomous offences ........................................... 26 Elemental Deficiencies and Consistency .................. 28 Undue advantage ................................................ 31 Private Sector ..................................................... 35 Trading in influence .............................................. 39 Bribery of foreign and international actors ............... 43 ETS No. 191 (Jurors and Arbitrators) ...................... 45 Extra-territorial jurisdiction ................................... 47 Sanctions ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Humans and Animals in the Norse North Atlantic
    Humans and Animals in the Norse North Atlantic Lara M. Hogg This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. School of History, Archaeology and Religion. Cardiff University. 2015 SUMMARY It is a well-established fact that all human societies have coexisted with and are dependent upon animals and it is increasingly recognized that the study of human-animal relationships provides vital insights into past human societies. Still this is yet to be widely embraced in archaeology. This thesis has examined human-animal interdependencies to explore the social identities and structure of society in the Norse North Atlantic. Benefitting from recent research advances in animal studies and the ever increasing volume of archaeological reports from Norse period archaeological excavations the North Atlantic this thesis was able to develop previous scholarship and define directions for future research. The thesis explored the role of animals in human society in the North Atlantic to reveal the complex Norse societies that existed. It revealed through human interdependencies with animals that these societies were far from homogeneous and had their own distinct identities with the individual islands as well as across the North Atlantic. The thesis achieved this by examining several important discrete but interlinked themes. These themes were divided into four chapters that focused on the individual aspects. This included an examination of previous North Atlantic Viking Age scholarship, consideration of human construction and perception of landscape through archaeological excavations, investigation of the role of domestic animals in human social activities, and an exploration of the role of domesticated animals in beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cross-Country Characterisation of the Patenting Behaviour of Firms Based on Matched Firm and Patent Data
    OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2013/05 A Cross-Country Characterisation Mariagrazia Squicciarini, of the Patenting Behaviour Hélène Dernis of Firms based on Matched Firm and Patent Data https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k40gxd4vh41-en Unclassified DSTI/DOC(2013)5 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 10-Sep-2013 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY Unclassified DSTI/DOC(2013)5 A CROSS-COUNTRY CHARACTERISATION OF THE PATENTING BEHAVIOUR OF FIRMS BASED ON MATCHED FIRM AND PATENT DATA STI Working Paper 2013/5 By Mariagrazia Squicciarini and Hélène Dernis (OECD) English - Or. English JT03344187 Complete document available on OLIS in its original format This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. DSTI/DOC(2013)5 STI WORKING PAPER SERIES The Working Paper series of the OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry is designed to make available to a wider readership selected studies prepared by staff in the Directorate or by outside consultants working on OECD projects. The papers included in the series cover a broad range of issues, of both a technical and policy-analytical nature, in the areas of work of the DSTI. The Working Papers are generally available only in their original language – English or French – with a summary in the other. Comments on the papers are invited, and should be sent to the Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, OECD, 2 rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Browsing Through Bias: the Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies
    Browsing through Bias: The Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies Sara A. Howard and Steven A. Knowlton Abstract The knowledge organization system prepared by the Library of Con- gress (LC) and widely used in academic libraries has some disadvan- tages for researchers in the fields of African American studies and LGBTQIA studies. The interdisciplinary nature of those fields means that browsing in stacks or shelflists organized by LC Classification requires looking in numerous locations. As well, persistent bias in the language used for subject headings, as well as the hierarchy of clas- sification for books in these fields, continues to “other” the peoples and topics that populate these titles. This paper offers tools to help researchers have a holistic view of applicable titles across library shelves and hopes to become part of a larger conversation regarding social responsibility and diversity in the library community.1 Introduction The neat division of knowledge into tidy silos of scholarly disciplines, each with its own section of a knowledge organization system (KOS), has long characterized the efforts of libraries to arrange their collections of books. The KOS most commonly used in American academic libraries is the Li- brary of Congress Classification (LCC). LCC, developed between 1899 and 1903 by James C. M. Hanson and Charles Martel, is based on the work of Charles Ammi Cutter. Cutter devised his “Expansive Classification” to em- body the universe of human knowledge within twenty-seven classes, while Hanson and Martel eventually settled on twenty (Chan 1999, 6–12). Those classes tend to mirror the names of academic departments then prevail- ing in colleges and universities (e.g., Philosophy, History, Medicine, and Agriculture).
    [Show full text]
  • LAW GOVERNING INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION Veijo Heiskanen*
    FORBIDDING DÉPEÇAGE: LAW GOVERNING INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION Veijo Heiskanen* 1. INTRODUCTION The law governing international arbitration has been a field of considerable conceptual controversy. The debate goes back to the 1960's and 1970's, when distinguished scholars such as F .A. Mann, Berthold Goldman, Philippe Fouchard and others argued whether international arbitration should be considered an autonomous system of law, a new lex mercatoria, or whether it ultimately remained subject to the applicable local legal sys- tem. i As is well known, the former view was shared by many * Partner, LALIVE, Geneva. 1 would like to thank David Bonifacio of LALIVE for effective and efficient research assistance. 1. For an overview of this discussion see, e.g., Berthold Goldman, Les conflits de lois dans l'arbitrage international de droit privé, 109 bk. II RECUEIL DES COÙRS 347 (1964) (hereinafter Goldman, Les conflits de lois); Berthold Goldman, Frontières du droit et lex mercatoria, 9 ARCHIVES DE PHILOSOPHIE DU DROIT 177 (1964) (hereinaf- ter Goldman, Frontières du droit et lex mercatoria); PHILIPPE FOUCHARD, L'ARBITRAGE COMMERCIAL INTERNATIONAL 351-457 (1965); F.A. Mann, Lex Facit Arbitrum, in INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION LIBER AMICORUM FOR MARTIN DOMKE 157 (Pieter Sanders ed., 1967); Pierre Lalive, Problèmes rélatifs à l'arbitrage interna- tional commercial, 120 bk. 1 RECUEIL DES COURS 569, 597-663 (1968); Pieter Sanders, Trends in the Field of International Commercial Arbitration, 145 bk. II RECUEIL DES COURS 205, 238-65 (1976); Pierre Lalive, Les règles de conflit de lois appliquées au fond du litige par l'arbitre international siègeant en Suisse, 145 RECUEIL DES COURS 2 (1976) (hereinafter Lalive, Les règles de conflit de lois appliquées); Harold J.
    [Show full text]
  • 109 . IMMOVABLES It the CONFLICT of LAWS 4. the DOCTRINE
    109 . IMMOVABLES It THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 4. THE DOCTRINE OF THE RENVOI At this point,,before the discussion passes from the topic of succession on death to that of transfer inter vivos, it seems appropriate to mention the doctrine of the renvoi, which has been invoked most frequently, though not exclusively, in Con- nection with succession. The problem arises from the fact that in a given situation connected with two or. more countries, the laws of those countries may be different not only as regards their. domestic rules,; but 'Also -as regards their conflict rules. If a. court in X, in accordance with a conflict rule' -of the forum, has selected the law of some other country, Y, as . the proper law with regard to a particular juridical question arising from the factual situation, and arrives at the stage of applying the law of Y,2 the court might do any one of three things. Firstly, it might reject or ignore the doctrine of the renvoi and apply simply the domestic rulee3 of the law of Y, without regard to the conflict rules of that law, that is, without regard to any possible reference back (renvoi) from the law of Y to the law of X or forward to the law of a third country, .Z. Secondly, it might adopt a theory of partial renvoi, that is, it might apply the conflict rules of the law, of Y to the extent of accepting a reference back from .the law of Y, and consequently apply the domestic rules of the law of X, without considering what, if any, theory of the renvoi prevails in the law of Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Full-Text
    [Vol. 11 2008] TOURO INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW 23 OPTIMAL RULE -SELECTION PRINCIPLES IN ANGLO -AMERICAN CONTRACTUAL JURISDICTION Alan Reed* I. INTRODUCTION Dyspeptic individuals and corporate entities are frequently engaged in multistate litigation as a concomitant of the growing body of activity at an international and interstate level. Litigants, like moths to a flame, are increasingly drawn towards the adventitious benefits of suit before a U.S. Court, and have sought to invoke jurisdiction over non-forum residents. As a consequence the court system has striven manfully, but arguably in vain, to propagate effective substantive principles, which are distilled casuistically in a commercial arena to identify sufficient nexus between a forum state and defendant, satisfying the constitutional standards of due process. 1 A legitimate blue litmus paper template for this important venue resolution conundrum has been difficult to achieve. Interpretative problems are evident in the assimilation of relevant methodological principles. In this context it is substantive principles relating to personal jurisdiction that operate as the fulcrum for a court entering a binding judgment against an impacted party. 2 A defendant will be haled before an alien court to defend an action as a consequence of state level empowerment, through adoption of long-arm statutes. It is vital, however, that the seized court’s exercise of jurisdiction comports with the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to *M.A. (Cantab.), LL.M. (University of Virginia), Solicitor and Professor of Criminal and Private International Law at Sunderland University. 1 See U.S. CONST . art. 1, § 10; Lakeside Bridge & Steel Co. v. Mountain State Constr.
    [Show full text]
  • Drafting National Legislation on Conflict of Laws: the Swiss Experience
    DRAFTING NATIONAL LEGISLATION ON CONFLICT OF LAWS: THE SWISS EXPERIENCE FRANK VISCHER* I WHY A CODIFICATION OF CONFLICT OF LAWS IN SWITZERLAND? Debate continues whether conflict of laws is a suitable subject for legisla- tion. To codify conflict of laws in comprehensive legislation in the late 20th century may even be regarded as an anachronistic undertaking. David Cavers' preoccupation has been how the pursuit of justice in the individual case and ease and certainty can be combined in prefixed rules.' His careful investigation of old and new experiments with codification, focusing specifically on that point, convinced him that "the persistent reluctance of American conflicts scholars to advocate legislative solutions" was justified. 2 It therefore requires some explanation why the Swiss Government, follow- ing examples in neighboring States, entrusted to a commission the task of presenting to the Parliament draft legislation covering the whole field of con- flict of laws. Although I never hid my skepticism whether for all fields of law a legislative solution is superior to a judicial approach,3 I had the honor of being nominated chairman of this Commission, consisting of all conflicts specialists in Switzerland. But since undertaking this task, and with the de- velopment of the draft which will be published early in 1978, I became more and more convinced of the merits of such a joint effort requiring concentra- tion on each problem until a suitable solution was found. I became aware how much more difficult the task of the legislator is in comparison with that of the scholar reviewing the work afterwards. International issues have increased greatly in the last decades.
    [Show full text]
  • General Rules on Private International Law in the American Countries
    239 CHAPTER III GENERAL RULES ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE AMERICAN COUNTRIES. COMPARATIVE LAW From the commentaries of Acursio (1228) up until the formula­ tion of the early general problems of private international law in the 19th century100, more than 600 years elapsed during which time specific conflicts rules relating to various substantive areas of law became part of civil or commercial codes101. Nonetheless, general institutions of private international law normally have not been enacted, and, therefore, the discipline of private international law does not presently enjoy legislative autonomy. In the Americas, the rules of private international law cannot be found in any single body of laws because the codes adopted throughout the hemisphere were enacted prior to the formulation of the general theory of private international law. It was only at the beginning of this century that a regional doctrinal trend, in­ spired by the worldwide achievement of scientific autonomy for private international law, began to develop in the Americas and sought solutions to the problems presented by the general institu­ tions of this discipline. More recently, a number of judgments have accorded the value related institutions of private international law greater relevance by seeking due justice, rather than formal adjudi­ cation in each specific case102. The Inter-American Convention on General Rules recognizes as fundamental this doctrinal and jurisprudential trend characterized by a growing deference for foreign law and for the individual in­ terests related thereto. For that reason, before examining the regional convention, it is appropriate to consider the national legislation as an overview and threshold to the study of regional conventional law.
    [Show full text]
  • Result-Selectivism in Conflicts Law* Symeon C. Symeonides
    WLR46-1_FINAL_SYMEONIDES FIX 12/16/2009 9:38 AM RESULT-SELECTIVISM IN CONFLICTS LAW* SYMEON C. SYMEONIDES** I. INTRODUCTION A. The Classical View: “Conflicts Justice” The classical, traditional view of the law of conflict of laws, going at least as far back as Savigny and Story,1 is grounded on the basic premise that the function of conflicts law is to ensure that each multistate legal dispute is resolved according to the law of the state that has the closest or otherwise most ―appropriate‖ relationship with that dispute. Opinions on defining and especially measuring the ―propriety‖ of such a relationship have differed over the years from one legal system to another and from one subject to the next. Despite such differences, however, all versions of the classical school have remained preoccupied with choosing the proper state to supply the applicable law, rather than directly searching for the proper law, much less the proper result. Indeed, the implicit—if not explicit—assumption of the classical school is that, in the great majority of cases, the law of the proper state is the proper law. But in this context, propriety is defined not in * Copyright 2009 by Symeon C. Symeonides. ** Dean and Alex L. Parks Distinguished Professor of Law, Willamette University College of Law; LL.B. (Priv. L.), LL.B. (Publ. L.) Univ. of Thessaloniki; LL.M., S.J.D. Harvard University. 1. See 8 FRIEDRICH CARL VON SAVIGNY, SYSTEM DES HEUTIGEN RÖMISCHEN RECHTS (1849), translated in WILLIAM GUTHRIE, PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, A TREATISE ON THE CONFLICT OF LAWS AND THE LIMITS OF THEIR OPERATION IN RESPECT OF PLACE AND TIME (1st ed.
    [Show full text]