Pressurized Thermal Shock in Nuclear Power Plants: Good Practices for Assessment Deterministic Evaluation for the Integrity of Reactor Pressure Vessel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pressurized Thermal Shock in Nuclear Power Plants: Good Practices for Assessment Deterministic Evaluation for the Integrity of Reactor Pressure Vessel IAEA-TECDOC-1627 Pressurized Thermal Shock in Nuclear Power Plants: Good Practices for Assessment Deterministic Evaluation for the Integrity of Reactor Pressure Vessel Pressurized Thermal Shock in Nuclear Power Plants: Good Practices for Assessment Deterministic Evaluation for the Integrity of Reactor Pressure Vessel The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GHANA NORWAY ALBANIA GREECE OMAN ALGERIA GUATEMALA PAKISTAN ANGOLA HAITI PALAU ARGENTINA HOLY SEE PANAMA ARMENIA HONDURAS PARAGUAY AUSTRALIA HUNGARY PERU AUSTRIA ICELAND PHILIPPINES AZERBAIJAN INDIA POLAND BAHRAIN INDONESIA PORTUGAL BANGLADESH IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF QATAR BELARUS IRAQ REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA BELGIUM IRELAND ROMANIA BELIZE ISRAEL RUSSIAN FEDERATION BENIN ITALY SAUDI ARABIA BOLIVIA JAMAICA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JAPAN SENEGAL BOTSWANA JORDAN SERBIA BRAZIL KAZAKHSTAN SEYCHELLES BULGARIA KENYA SIERRA LEONE BURKINA FASO KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE BURUNDI KUWAIT SLOVAKIA CAMBODIA KYRGYZSTAN SLOVENIA CAMEROON LATVIA SOUTH AFRICA CANADA LEBANON SPAIN CENTRAL AFRICAN LESOTHO SRI LANKA REPUBLIC LIBERIA SUDAN CHAD LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA SWEDEN CHILE LIECHTENSTEIN SWITZERLAND CHINA LITHUANIA SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC COLOMBIA LUXEMBOURG TAJIKISTAN CONGO MADAGASCAR THAILAND COSTA RICA MALAWI THE FORMER YUGOSLAV CÔTE D’IVOIRE MALAYSIA REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA CROATIA MALI TUNISIA CUBA MALTA TURKEY CYPRUS MARSHALL ISLANDS UGANDA CZECH REPUBLIC MAURITANIA UKRAINE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC MAURITIUS UNITED ARAB EMIRATES OF THE CONGO MEXICO UNITED KINGDOM OF DENMARK MONACO GREAT BRITAIN AND DOMINICAN REPUBLIC MONGOLIA NORTHERN IRELAND ECUADOR MONTENEGRO EGYPT MOROCCO UNITED REPUBLIC EL SALVADOR MOZAMBIQUE OF TANZANIA ERITREA MYANMAR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ESTONIA NAMIBIA URUGUAY ETHIOPIA NEPAL UZBEKISTAN FINLAND NETHERLANDS VENEZUELA FRANCE NEW ZEALAND VIETNAM GABON NICARAGUA YEMEN GEORGIA NIGER ZAMBIA GERMANY NIGERIA ZIMBABWE The Agency’s Statute was approved on 23 October 1956 by the Conference on the Statute of the IAEA held at United Nations Headquarters, New York; it entered into force on 29 July 1957. The Headquarters of the Agency are situated in Vienna. Its principal objective is “to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world’’. IAEA-TECDOC-1627 Pressurized Thermal Shock in Nuclear Power Plants: Good Practices for Assessment Deterministic Evaluation for the Integrity of Reactor Pressure Vessel INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA, 2010 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All IAEA scientific and technical publications are protected by the terms of the Universal Copyright Convention as adopted in 1952 (Berne) and as revised in 1972 (Paris). The copyright has since been extended by the World Intellectual Property Organization (Geneva) to include electronic and virtual intellectual property. Permission to use whole or parts of texts contained in IAEA publications in printed or electronic form must be obtained and is usually subject to royalty agreements. Proposals for non-commercial reproductions and translations are welcomed and considered on a case-by-case basis. Enquiries should be addressed to the IAEA Publishing Section at: Sales and Promotion, Publishing Section International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna International Centre PO Box 100 1400 Vienna, Austria fax: +43 1 2600 29302 tel.: +43 1 2600 22417 email: [email protected] http://www.iaea.org/books For further information on this publication, please contact: Nuclear Power Engineering Section International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna International Centre P.O. Box 100 1400 Vienna, Austria PRESSURIZED THERMAL SHOCK IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS: GOOD PRACTICES FOR ASSESSMENT IAEA, VIENNA, 2010 IAEA-TECDOC-1627 ISBN 978-92-0-111109-8 ISSN 1011-4289 © IAEA, 2010 Printed by the IAEA in Austria February 2010 FOREWORD Starting in the early 1970s, a series of coordinated research projects (CRPs) was sponsored by the IAEA focusing on the effects of neutron radiation on reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels and RPV integrity. In conjunction with these CRPs, many consultants meetings, specialists meetings, and international conferences, dating back to the mid-1960s, were held. Individual studies on the basic phenomena of radiation hardening and embrittlement were also performed to better understand increases in tensile strength and shifts to higher temperatures for the integrity of the RPV. The overall objective of this CRP was to perform benchmark deterministic calculations of a typical pressurized thermal shock (PTS) regime, with the aim of comparing the effects of individual parameters on the final RPV integrity assessment, and then to recommend the best practices for their implementation in PTS procedures. At present, several different procedures and approaches are used for RPV integrity assessment for both WWER 440-230 reactors and pressurized water reactors (PWRs). These differences in procedures and approaches are based, in principle, on the different codes and rules used for design and manufacturing, and the different materials used for the various types of reactor, and the different levels of implementation of recent developments in fracture mechanics. Benchmark calculations were performed to improve user qualification and to reduce the user effect on the results of the analysis. This addressed generic PWR and WWER types of RPV, as well as sensitivity analyses. The complementary sensitivity analyses showed that the following factors significantly influenced the assessment: flaw size, shape, location and orientation, thermal hydraulic assumptions and material toughness. Applying national codes and procedures to the benchmark cases produced significantly different results in terms of allowable material toughness. This was mainly related to the safety factors used and the approaches to postulated defects, postulated transients and representation of material toughness. The IAEA wishes to thank the participants for their contributions, especially the CRP chairman, M. Brumovský of Nuclear Research Institute Řež plc, Czech Republic. The IAEA officers responsible for this publication were K.S. Kang and L. Kupca of the Division of Nuclear Power. EDITORIAL NOTE The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries. The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. RPV integrity studies........................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Coordinated research project - 9.......................................................................................... 4 1.4. Structure............................................................................................................................... 6 1.5. Results of benchmark calculations including sensitivity study ........................................... 7 1.6. References ........................................................................................................................... 8 2. SELECTION OF OVERCOOLING SEQUENCES ..................................................................... 9 2.1. General considerations......................................................................................................... 9 2.2. Precursors ............................................................................................................................ 9 2.3. Categorization of sequences of initiating events and corresponding criteria .................... 11 2.4. Initiating events groups...................................................................................................... 11 2.5. References ......................................................................................................................... 13 3. THERMAL HYDRAULIC ANALYSES ................................................................................... 14 3.1. Sequence analysis plan ...................................................................................................... 14 3.2. Calculation method requirements ...................................................................................... 14 3.3. Boundary conditions.......................................................................................................... 15 3.3.1. Plant operating conditions .................................................................................... 15 3.3.2. Symmetric cooling................................................................................................ 16 3.3.3. Plume cooling....................................................................................................... 16 3.3.4. Failures ................................................................................................................. 17 3.4. Operator actions................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Thermal Shock
    TEACHER INSTRUCTIONS Thermal Shock Objective: To illustrate thermal expansion and thermal shock. Background Information: In physics, thermal expansion is the tendency of matter to increase in volume or pressure when heated. For liquids and solids, the amount of expansion will normally vary depending on the material’s coefficient of thermal expansion. When materials contract, tensile forces are created. When things expand, compressive forces are created. Thermal shock is the name given to cracking as a result of rapid temperature change. From the laboratory standpoint, there are three main types of glass used today: borosilicate, quartz, and soda lime or flint glass. Borosilicate glass is made to withstand thermal shock better than most other glass through a combination of reduced expansion coefficient and greater strength, though fused quartz outperforms it in both respects. Some glass-ceramic materials include a controlled proportion of material with a negative expansion coefficient, so that the overall coefficient can be reduced to almost exactly zero over a reasonably wide range of temperatures. Improving the shock resistance of glass and ceramics can be achieved by improving the strength of the materials or by reducing its tendency to uneven expansion. One example of success in this area is Pyrex, the brand name that is well known to most consumers as cookware, but which is also used to manufacture laboratory glassware. Pyrex traditionally is made with a borosilicate glass with the addition of boron, which prevents shock by reducing the tendency of glass to expand. Demo description: Three different types of glass rods will be heated so that students can observe the amount of thermal shock that occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Array Packages with Known Reliably and Mitigation Risks, Allowing Greater Processing Power in a Smaller Board Footprint and Lower System Weight
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Reliability of CGA/LGA/HDI Package Board/Assembly (Revision A) Reza Ghaffarian, Ph.D. Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California JPL Publication 12-3 2/12 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Reliability of CGA/LGA/HDI Package Board/Assembly (Revision A) NASA Electronic Parts and Packaging (NEPP) Program Office of Safety and Mission Assurance Reza Ghaffarian, Ph.D. Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California NASA WBS: 724297.40.43 JPL Project Number: 104593 Task Number: 40.49.02.02 Jet Propulsion Laboratory 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, CA 91109 http://nepp.nasa.gov This research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, and was sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Electronic Parts and Packaging (NEPP) Program. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement by the United States Government or the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. Copyright 2013. California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Acknowledgments The author would like to acknowledge many people from industry and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) who were critical to the progress of this activity. The author extends his appreciation to program managers of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Electronics Parts and Packaging (NEPP) Program, including Michael Sampson, Ken LaBel, Drs. Charles Barnes and Douglas Sheldon for their continuous support and encouragement. ii OBJECTIVES AND PRODUCTS Commercial-off-the-shelf column grid array (COTS CGA) packaging technologies in high-reliability versions are now being considered for use in a number of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) electronic systems.
    [Show full text]
  • US to Host G7
    US to host G7 May 14, 2020 Source: The Hindu Manifest pedagogy: G7 and G20 are two different power blocs in the world today who have gained significance with the growing multipolar world order. Hence it is necessary to read both from prelims as well as mains perspective. In news: Trump to host G7 meeting via video conference Placing it in syllabus: Multilateral groupings Dimensions: G7 history origin and headquarters Its contributions Criticisms against G7 and G20 as an alternative to it Content: The 46th G7 summit which was scheduled to be held through June 12, 2020, in Camp David, United States, will be conducted by video conference in response to the global coronavirus pandemic. Participants will include the leaders of the G7 member states as well as representatives of the European Union. The decision has come as nations around the world have sealed their borders and have banned travel to stop the virus’ spread. G7 history origin: G7 stands for “Group of Seven” industrialized nations. It used to be known as the G8 (Group of Eight) until 2014 when Russia was excluded because of its annexation of Crimea from Ukraine. France, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States and West Germany formed the Group of Six in 1975 so that the noncommunist powers could come together to discuss important economic issues, global security etc… Canada joined the group in 1976. Russia joined in 1998 and signaled a cooperation between East and West after the Soviet Union’s collapse in 1991. The G7 is an informal bloc and takes no mandatory decisions, so the leaders’ declarations at the end of the summit are not binding.
    [Show full text]
  • MATERIAL SCIENCE Module 3 Thermal Shock Thermal Shock DOE-HDBK-1017/2-93 TABLE of CONTENTS
    Department of Energy Fundamentals Handbook MATERIAL SCIENCE Module 3 Thermal Shock Thermal Shock DOE-HDBK-1017/2-93 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .................................................. ii LIST OF TABLES ................................................... iii REFERENCES .................................................... iv OBJECTIVES ..................................................... v THERMAL STRESS ................................................ 1 Thermal Shock ............................................... 1 Summary ................................................... 5 PRESSURIZED THERMAL SHOCK .................................... 6 Definition ................................................... 6 Evaluating Effects of PTS ....................................... 6 Locations of Primary Concern ..................................... 8 Summary ................................................... 8 Rev. 0 Page i MS-03 LIST OF FIGURES DOE-HDBK-1017/2-93 Thermal Shock LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Stress on Reactor Vessel Wall .................................... 4 Figure 2 Heatup Stress Profile .......................................... 7 Figure 3 Cooldown Stress Profile ........................................ 7 MS-03 Page ii Rev. 0 Thermal Shock DOE-HDBK-1017/2-93 LIST OF TABLES LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Coefficients of Linear Thermal Expansion ............................ 2 Rev. 0 Page iii MS-03 REFERENCES DOE-HDBK-1017/2-93 Thermal Shock REFERENCES Academic Program for Nuclear Power Plant Personnel, Volume
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Shock-Resistant Cement
    BNL-101087-2012-IR Thermal Shock-resistant Cement T. Sugama, T. Pyatina, S. Gill February 2012 Sustainable Energy Technologies Department/Energy Conversion Group Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy DOE office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Notice: This manuscript has been authored by employees of Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The publisher by accepting the manuscript for publication acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. 1 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrosion Science 173 (2020) 108828
    Corrosion Science 173 (2020) 108828 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Corrosion Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/corsci The oxidation effect on the cracking behavior of a Co-based alloy under thermal shocks T Junxia Wena,b,c,d, Rui Caoa,b,*, Hongyan Chee, Hao Donge, Haiyan Zhanga,b, Yingjie Yana,b, Yanfei Gaoc,**, Peter K Liawc,** a State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Non-ferrous Metal, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu, China b School of Materials Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu, China c Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA d School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Liuzhou Vocational & Technical College, Liuzhou 545006, Guangxi, China e Advanced Technology & Materials Limited Company, China Iron & Steel Research Institute Group, Beijing, 100081, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Oxidation and cracking behavior during thermal-shock experiments of a new Co-based alloy were analyzed in Co-based alloy the present work. Comparing to the static conditions, the oxidation behavior during thermal shocks is stress- Thermal shock assisted and crack-accelerated. Cracks during the thermal shocks were initiated from the sample surfaces and Oxidation their growth are driven by various stresses, including those induced by volume change, mismatch of coefficients Crack of thermal expansion (CTEs), and temperature gradient between the matrix and the internal oxides. It is found Thermal fatigue that the crack propagation correlates to these stresses in the classic Paris’ law. 1. Introduction also different from that in the static oxidation. The cyclic oxidation behavior of the Co-based alloy has been well investigated by Barrett The Co-based alloy has a good combination of high-temperature and Lowel [13].
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Research on Thermal Shock Resistance of Ultra-High Temperature Ceramics Focusing on the Adjustment of Stress Reduction Factor
    Materials 2013, 6, 551-564; doi:10.3390/ma6020551 OPEN ACCESS materials ISSN 1996-1944 www.mdpi.com/journal/materials Article Theoretical Research on Thermal Shock Resistance of Ultra-High Temperature Ceramics Focusing on the Adjustment of Stress Reduction Factor Dengjian Li 1, Weiguo Li 1,*, Dingyu Li 1, Yushan Shi 1 and Daining Fang 2 1 State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China; E-Mails: [email protected] (De.L.); [email protected] (Di.L.); [email protected] (Y.S.) 2 State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-023-6546-8932; Fax: +86-023-6546-8932. Received: 27 November 2012; in revised form: 30 January 2013 / Accepted: 31 January 2013 / Published: 18 February 2013 Abstract: The thermal shock resistance of ceramics depends on not only the mechanical and thermal properties of materials, but also the external constraint and thermal condition. So, in order to study the actual situation in its service process, a temperature-dependent thermal shock resistance model for ultra-high temperature ceramics considering the effects of the thermal environment and external constraint was established based on the existing theory. The present work mainly focused on the adjustment of the stress reduction factor according to different thermal shock situations. The influences of external constraint on both critical rupture temperature difference and the second thermal shock resistance parameter in either case of rapid heating or cooling conditions had been studied based on this model.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN 19 November 2019 Original: English
    UNITED NATIONS UNEP/MED IG.24/Inf.10 UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN 19 November 2019 Original: English 21st Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean and its Protocols Naples, Italy, 2-5 December 2019 Agenda Item 6: Date and Place of the 22nd Meeting of the Contracting Parties Indicative Calendar of Main UNEP/MAP Meetings and Major International Events For environmental and cost-saving reasons, this document is printed in a limited number. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. UNEP/MAP Athens, 2019 Note by the Secretariat With the view to facilitate the planning and participation at MAP meetings, the Secretariat has prepared for information purposes an indicative calendar of the main institutional meetings of the UNEP/MAP- Barcelona Convention system and of major international events of MAP relevance. In preparing this indicative calendar, the Secretariat took into account two important criteria: a) the Twenty Second Meeting of the Contracting Parties (COP 22) should be held before the end of 2021; and b) overlapping with already planned major global relevant meetings should be avoided. Dates and venues of the proposed UNEP/MAP-Barcelona Convention meetings will be confirmed and updated as appropriate at a later stage in consultation with the Bureau of the Contracting Parties. The Secretariat will review and update the calendar accordingly, and complete it with other policy, technical and thematic meetings of the MAP system, as appropriate. UNEP/MED IG.24/Inf.10 Page 1 A.
    [Show full text]
  • IBPS CLERK CAPSULE for ALL COMPETITIVE EXAMS Exclusively Prepared for RACE Students Issue: 04 | Page : 102 | Topic : IBPS CAPSULE | Price: Not for Sale
    IBPS CLERK CAPSULE for ALL COMPETITIVE EXAMS Exclusively prepared for RACE students Issue: 04 | Page : 102 | Topic : IBPS CAPSULE | Price: Not for Sale INDEX TOPIC Page No BANKING & FINANCIAL AWARENESS 2 LIST OF INDEXES BY VARIOUS ORGANISATIONS 11 GDP FORECAST OF INDIA BY VARIOUS ORGANISATION 15 LIST OF VARIOUS COMMITTEE & ITS HEAD 15 LOAN SANCTIONED BY NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL BANKS TO 17 INDIA PENALITY IMPOSED BY RBI TO VARIOUS BANKS IN INDIA 18 LIST OF ACQUISTION & MERGER 18 APPS/SCHEMES/FACILITY LAUNCHED BY VARIOUS 19 BANKS/ORGANISATIONS/COMPANY STATE NEWS 22 NATIONAL NEWS 38 IIT’S IN NEWS 46 NATIONAL SUMMITS 47 INTERNATIONAL SUMMITS 51 INTERNATIONAL NEWS 52 BUSINESS AND ECONOMY 60 LIST OF AGREEMENTS/MOU’S SIGNED 66 BRAND AMBASSADORS / APPOINTMENTS 68 AWARDS & HONOURS 70 BOOKS & AUTHORS 74 SPORTS NEWS 78 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 86 DEFENCE EXERCISES 93 IMPORTANT EVENTS OF THE DAY 94 OBITUARY 96 CABINET MINISTERS 2019 / LIST OF MINISTERS OF STATE 101 (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) CHIEF MINISTERS AND GOVERNORS 102 ________________________________________________________ 7601808080 / 9043303030 RACE Coaching Institute for Banking and Government Jobs www. RACEInstitute. in Courses Offered : BANK | SSC | RRB | TNPSC |KPSC 2 | IBPS CLERK CAPSULE | IBPS CLERK 2019 CAPSULE (JULY – NOVEMBER 2019) BANKING AND FINANCE Punjab & Sind Bank has set up a centralized hub named “Centralised MSME & Retail Group” (Cen MARG) for processing retail and Micro, Small and RBI gets the power to regulate housing finance companies instead Medium Enterprises (MSME) loans for better efficiency of branches in of NHB business acquisition. It is headquartered in New Delhi. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman stated that India's central bank, Wilful defaults exceed $21 billion in India for the year 2018-19, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) will now be given power to takes over as the SBI holds the highest regulator of Housing Finance Firms(HFFs) instead of NHB(National Housing The state-owned banks in India stated that Rs.
    [Show full text]
  • Capsule for Rrb Po/Asst & Niacl (Mains)
    aa Is Now In CHENNAI | MADURAI | TRICHY | SALEM | COIMBATORE | CHANDIGARH | BANGALORE |ERODE | NAMAKKAL | PUDUCHERRY |THANJAVUR |TRIVANDRUM | ERNAKULAM |TIRUNELVELI |VELLORE | www.raceinstitute.in | www.bankersdaily.in CAPSULE FOR RRB PO/ASST & NIACL (MAINS). GENERAL AWARENESS & STATIC GK Exclusively prepared for RACE students Chennai: #1, South Usman Road, T Nagar. | Madurai: #24/21, Near MapillaiVinayagar Theatre, Kalavasal. | Trichy: opp BSNL office, Juman Center, 43 Promenade Road, Cantonment. | Salem: #209, Sonia Plaza / Muthu Complex, Junction Main Rd, State Bank Colony, Salem. | Coimbatore #545, 1st floor, Adjacent to SBI (DB Road Branch),DiwanBahadur Road, RS Puram, Coimbatore| Chandigarh| Bangalore|Erode |Namakkal |Puducherry |Thanjavur| Trivandrum| Ernakulam|Tirunelveli | Vellore | H.O: 7601808080 / 9043303030 | www.raceinstitute.in Chennai RACE Coaching Institute Pvt Ltd CAPSULE FOR RRB PO/ASST & NIACL (MAINS) BANKING & FINANCIAL AWARENESS RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) Third Bi-Monthly Monetary Policy Statement, 2018-19: Resolution of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC): Reserve Bank of India Policy Rate Current Rate Previous Rate Repo Rate 6.50% 6. 25% Reverse Repo Rate 6.25% 6. 00% Marginal Standing 6.75% 6. 50% Facility Rate Bank Rate 6.75% 6. 50% CRR 4% (Unchanged) 4% SLR 19. 5% 19. 5% (Unchanged) ➢ The six-member monetary policy committee (MPC) of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has decided to increase the repo rate by 25 basis points to 6.5% due to inflation concerns. ➢ According to the RBI Annual Report, it was mentioned due to the evolving economic conditions, real GDP growth for 2018-19 is expected to increase to 7.4% from 6.7% in the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Thermal Buckling of Suddenly Heated Temperature-Dependent FGM Cylindrical Shells, Under Combined Axial Compression and External Pressure
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Available online at www.sciencedirect.com International Journal of Solids and Structures 45 (2008) 2598–2612 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijsolstr Dynamic thermal buckling of suddenly heated temperature-dependent FGM cylindrical shells, under combined axial compression and external pressure M. Shariyat * Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran Received 7 June 2007; received in revised form 14 December 2007 Available online 28 December 2007 Abstract FGM components are constructed to sustain high temperature gradients. There are many applications where the FGM components are vulnerable to transient thermal shocks. If a component is already under compressive external loads (e.g. under a combination of axial compression and external pressure), the mentioned thermal shocks will cause the component to exhibit dynamic behavior and in some cases may lead to buckling. On the other hand, a preheated FGM component may undergo dynamic mechanical loads. Only static thermal buckling investigations were developed so far for the FGM shells. In the present paper, dynamic buckling of a pre-stressed, suddenly heated imperfect FGM cylindrical shell and dynamic buckling of a mechanically loaded imperfect FGM cylindrical shell in thermal environment, with temperature- dependent properties are presented. The general form of Green’s strain tensor in curvilinear coordinates and a high order shell theory proposed already by the author are used. Instead of using semi-analytical solutions that rely on the validity of the separation of variables concept, the complicated nonlinear governing equations are solved using the finite element method.
    [Show full text]
  • Dramatic Drop in Economic Output in 1Q 2020 Key
    Tan Lena [email protected] Global Economics & Markets Research Email: [email protected] URL: www.uobgroup.com/research Month In Review May 2020 DRAMATIC DROP IN ECONOMIC OUTPUT IN 1Q 2020 Real GDP (% q/q, sa except Singapore & US in q/q saar) 4Q 2019 1Q 2020 +1.8 +2.1 2.0 +1.5 +0.1 +0.4 +0.6 +0.6 0.0 -0.1 -0.3 -0.2 -2.0 -0.5 -0.9 -2.0 -1.7 -2.2 -1.9 -4.0 -2.4 -3.8 -6.0 -4.7 -5.1 -4.7 -5.0 -5.8 -5.2 -5.3 -8.0 -10.0 -9.8 Eurozone France Italy Spain China Hong Kong Malaysia Indonesia Philippines Thailand Singapore US Japan KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM CHINA’S NPC SINGAPORE’S FORTITUDE BUDGET China’s National People’s Congress (NPC) was held on 22-28 May after Singapore announced its fourth round of support measures 2 months of delay. Some of the key takeaways from the meeting. worth S$33 billion focusing on 3 areas. Help businesses & workers to adapt and transform Total Budget Additional support to Dedicated households & community S$92.9 billion Funding to frontline 19.2% of GDP agencies China did not set an To increase the local Further tax & fees cuts annual growth target government special and financial support (for the first time) for bond issuance quota to keep business Fortitude Budget S$33 billion 2020, citing the need to CNY3.75 trillion in operations stable. for policy flexibility 2020 to boost Solidarity Budget S$5.1 billion amidst the infrastructure spending uncertainties.
    [Show full text]