Canadian Environmentalists
Canadian Environmentalists 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Michael Bailey charge of Belleville Green Check, which conducted Currently: Bevan-Baker currently serves as the leader energy audits on area homes. He played a role in op of Prince Edward Island’s Green Party. He is the first Currently: Director of Operations, The Climate Summit - posing a coal-fired power plant at Point Aconi, Cape person to win a seat for the Green Party in the PEI legis (theclimatesummit.org), and Producer/Director at - Breton. Bennett also headed the national Climate Action Planetviews Productions, based in Honolulu, Hawaii. lature, having been elected in May 2015. He previously Network. He served as Communications Director for the ran for election 10 times, federally and provincially. Career: Bailey is a graduate of Al Gore’s The Climate Green Party of Canada and has worked closely with Career: Earned his Bachelor of Dental Surgery degree Project training program and is currently an authorized party leader Elizabeth May. from the University of Glasgow. After an unsuccessful presenter for the program. In addition to his documen- Contact: Friends of the Earth Canada, #200, 251 Bank run for office in the 2001 federal election, Bevan-Baker tary film work, Bailey was an official observer at the In- St., Ottawa, ON K2P 1X3; Phone: (613) 241-0085; Fax: worked with Liberal MP Joe Jordan to write the Canada ternational Whaling Commission and has been involved (613) 566-3449; e-mail: [email protected]; Well-Being Measurement Bill, which sought to establish in anti-whaling and dolphin protection initiatives, as well URL: foecanada.org the Genuine Progress Index, measuring the health of as other environmental and wildlife conservation pro- people, communities & eco-systems. It is considered to grams. He supervised the original Rainbow Warrior, be one of the greenest pieces of legislation to reach the flagship of Greenpeace. Tzeporah Berman Born February 5, 1969, in London, ON. floor of the House of Commons. In 2012 he led a coali- Contact: Planetviews International, #100-147, 758 tion of Islanders against the Plan B project, which aimed Kapahulu Ave., Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 96816; Phone: Currently: Berman, an active and controversial figure in to reroute part of the Trans Canada Highway through a (415) 484-8343; Fax: (808) 733-7808; e-mail: conserva- the Canadian environmentalist movement, currently portion of the ancient Acadian Forest. [email protected]; URL: planetviews.org functions in a strategic advisory capacity for numerous environmental, First Nations, and philanthropic organi- Contact: PO Box 2000, Charlottetown, PE C1A 7N8; Phone: (902) 620-3977; e-mail: psbevanbaker@assem- Maude Barlow zations engaged in clean energy and issues related to oilsands and pipelines. She is also an Adjunct Professor bly.pe.ca; URL: thirdpartypei.ca; greenparty.pe.ca. Born May 24, 1947. in York University’s Faculty of Environmental Studies. In Currently: Chair of Food and Water Watch, based in 2015 she was appointed to the BC Government Climate David B. Brooks Washington, DC; a member of the executive of the Inter- Leadership Team in order to help BC meet its climate Born in the U.S.; immigrated to Canada in 1970. national Forum on Globalization, located in San Fran- targets. Berman has also served as a designer for pro - Career: In addition to degrees in Geology from MIT cisco; and a councillor of the World Future Council, motional campaigns for Greenpeace International, for (B.Sc. 1955) and the California Institute of Technology based in Hamburg, Germany. the Volkswagen campaign in Europe, and for the Clean (M.Sc. 1956), Dr. Brooks holds a Ph.D. in Economics Our Cloud campaign, the latter of which pushed Apple Career: Barlow served as Senior Advisor on Water to from the University of Colorado (1963). Dr. Brooks is the and Facebook to adopt renewable energy resources to the 63rd President of the United Nations General As- Founding President, a past President (1996-97), and a power their data centres. sembly, 2008-2009. She is the co-founder of the Blue Director of Research for Friends of the Earth Canada. Planet Project, a global initiative with a focus on secur- Career: Berman’s earliest activity as an environmental He is a past Acting Director for Environment and Natural ing the right to water, and sustainable solutions to the organizer began in the early 1990s, during the Resources Management at the International Develop- water crisis. She is also the former Chairperson of The Clayoquot Sound anti-logging protests; her role as a ment Research Centre (IDRC), headquartered in Ot- Council of Canadians, a citizens’ advocacy group with central figure in organizing and promoting the demon- tawa, the Founding Director of the Office of Energy chapters across the country. strations led to the then-Premier labeling her “an enemy Conservation at Energy, Mines and Resources Canada, Books: Barlow has authored or co-authored numerous of the state”—and to her arrest under 857 counts of and a member of the International Water Academy, as books and reports, including the bestseller, Blue Cove- criminal aiding and abetting. After shifting her efforts well as serving as an Associate for the International In- nant: The Global Water Crisis, and Boiling Point: Gov- from forestry to climate change, Berman was named by stitute of Sustainable Development’s Natural and Social ernment Neglect, Corporate Abuse, and Canada’s the Premier of British Columbia to the Green Energy Ad- Capital program. His research, interdisciplinary in ap- Water Crisis (2016). Her most recent book is Whose visory Task Force in 2009. Berman has founded and proach, has focused on ways to reduce the dependence Water is it Anyway? Taking water protection into public served in senior positions with a number of Canadian on minerals, water and energy in economic production hands (2019). and international environmental organizations, acting as and other areas, while slowing or avoiding environmen- Co-Director at Greenpeace International’s Global Cli- tal degradation. Dr. Brooks has a particular interest in Awards: Recipient of fourteen honourary doctorates mate and Energy Program; as Executive Director and water soft paths, a method or system which targets cur- from Canadian universities, most recently from Mount Co-Founder at PowerUp Canada, which targeted key rent water use practices to foster conservation and effi- Saint Vincent University in Halifax, in 2016. Barlow was federal ridings in an effort to mobilize voters around cli- ciency (rather than a supply side or demand also granted the 2005 Right Livelihood Award, the Cita- mate change; and as Co-founder and Campaign Direc- perspective) as the foundation for a long-term, tion of Lifetime Achievement at the 2008 Canadian Envi- tor of ForestEthics, a group that informs consumers sustainable strategy for managing water as a critical ronment Awards, and the 2009 Earth Day Canada about the environmentally harmful business practices of resource. He is a noted author and conference speaker. Outstanding Environmental Achievement Award. She is large corporate suppliers. featured in Sam Bozzo’s documentary film Blue Gold: Awards: Recipient of an honourary doctorate in envi- World Water Wars, and is the subject of both the Na- Awards: Recipient of the 2015 YWCA Women of Dis- ronmental studies from the University of Waterloo. - tional Film Board’s documentary Democracy à la Maude tinction Award in British Columbia. In 2013, Berman re Books: Author of: Zero Energy Growth for Canada: Wa- (1998) and a CBC TV Life and Times biography, “Im- ceived an honourary doctorate from the University of ter-Local Level Management (IDRC’s in-focus series); Corporate Knights movable Maude: The Life and Times of Maude Barlow” British Columbia and was selected by co-author of: Watershed: The Role of Fresh Water in the (2001). magazine as one of the Top Women in Sustainability. Israeli-Palestinian Conflict; co-editor of Making the Most Berman was also a featured interview subject in the of the Water we Have: The Soft Path Approach to Water Contact: Food and Water Watch, 1616 P Street NW The 11th Hour - 2007 environmental film , narrated by Leo Management (2009). Washington, DC, USA 20036; Phone: (202) 683-2500; nardo DiCaprio. She has been included in an exhibit at Toll-Free: (855) 340-8083; e-mail: [email protected]; the BC Royal Museum that celebrates 150 central Contact: [email protected] URL: www.foodandwaterwatch.org. figures in British Columbia history. Books: This Crazy Time: Living Our Environmental Silver Donald Cameron John Bennett Change (2011). Born June 21, 1973, in Toronto, ON. Currently: Senior Policy Advisor, Friends of the Earth. Contact: URL: tzeporahberman.com; Twitter: twit- Career: Completed his B.A. from the University of Brit- Career: Bennett served as executive director at Sierra ter.com/Tzeporah ish Columbia in 1960, his M.A. from the University of Club Canada from 2007-2015, and in various capacities California, Berkeley in 1962, and his Ph.D. from the Uni- since 1998. While a student at the University of Toronto, Peter Bevan-Baker versity of London in 1967. Cameron became an English professor at the University of New Brunswick in 1968. In he was instrumental in establishing the Toronto office of Born June 3, 1962, in Aberdeen, Scotland; immigrated Greenpeace. After working as a newspaper reporter for 1971 he became a full time writer, and has since written to Canada in 1985. ten years, Bennett returned to Greenpeace in 1989, and 18 books, a stage play and over 50 radio dramas. He also worked with Pollution Probe. In 1994, he was in has previously served as the Writer-in-Residence at the
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-1 Canadian Environmentalists
Nova Scotia College of Art and Design, the University of environmental documentaries: Be the Change (2008), Political Career: NDP member for Port Prince Edward Island, and the University College of Powerful: Energy for Everyone (2010) and Bike City, Moody—Coquitlam (formerly New Westmin- Cape Breton. Cameron has taught at Cape Breton Uni- Great City (2013). ster—Coquitlam) in the House of Commons from versity, Dalhousie University and the University of British Political Career: In 2003, Chernushenko was the 2009-2019. Donnelly served as NDP Critic for Fisheries Columbia. Currently, he is a host and executive pro- Green Party candidate in the Ontario general election and Oceans, and introduced legislation to ban oil tank- ducer at TheGreenInterview.com, an environmental for the riding of Ottawa South, but was not elected. He ers from the Northern BC coast, as well as legislation to website that hosts conversations between environmen- has run for federal office in Ottawa twice, in 2004 and make BC fish farms closed-containment. He was tal activists. Cameron also wrote and narrated 2 docu- 2006, also for the Green Party, but was unsuccessful re-elected in the same riding in the 2011 and 2015 elec- Bhutan: The Pursuit of Gross mentaries for the site: both times. In 2006 Chernushenko ran for leader of the tions. He did not seek re-election in 2019. National Happiness (2010) and Salmon Wars: Salmon Green Party of Canada, ultimately losing to current Career: Educated at the University of Victoria. Donnelly Farms, Wild Fish and the Future of Communities (2012). leader Elizabeth May. He served as deputy leader of the is the founder of the Rivershed Society of BC. The orga- He is also the writer and narrator of the GreenRights party until 2007. In 2010 Chernushenko was successful nization promotes sustainable life choices to citizens of multi-media project, which seeks to raise awareness of in his bid to become a city councillor in Capital Ward in the Fraser River Basin. The initiative was born out of environmental rights. the Ottawa municipal election, and was re-elected in Donnelly’s marathon swim across the Fraser River, Books: Cameron has authored and co-authored 19 2014. He was the chair of the city’s Environment Com- which was meant to raise awareness about environmen- books, most notably The Education of Everett Richard- mittee, and served on the Transportation Committee, the tal impacts on rivers. He has since swum 3,200 km of son (1977), The Prophet at Tantramar (1988), Wind, Finance and Economic Development Committee BC rivers & lakes. From 2002-2009, Donnelly was a city Whales and Whisky (1991), The Living Beach (1998), (FEDCO), the Board of Health and the Ottawa Commu- councillor for Coquitlam. Sailing Away From Winter (2007), Warrior Lawyers nity Lands Development Corporation. Contact: Facebook: www.facebook.com/fin.donnelly; (2016), and Blood in the Water (2020). Books: Greening our Games: Running Sports Events Twitter: twitter.com/FinDonnelly Awards: Literary awards include the Evelyn Richardson and Facilities that Won’t Cost the Earth (1994); co-au- Award, the Atlantic Provinces Booksellers Award, and thor: Sustainable Sport Management: Running an Envi- Linda Duncan the City of Dartmouth Book Award. His television pro- ronmentally, Socially and Economically Responsible Born June 25, 1949, in Edmonton, AB. gram Peggy was named Best Short Film at the Cana- Organization (2001). dian Film Celebration and the Moonsnail Awards, and Political Career: NDP member for Edmonton Contact: URL: davidc.ca; Twitter: twit- Strathcona at the House of Commons from 2008-2019. was nominated for a Gemini. He is the recipient of ter.com/chernushenko honourary doctorates from the University of Kings Col- At the time of her election, she became the only lege and Cape Breton University. He received the Order non-Conservative MP in Alberta. Duncan served as of Canada and the Order of Nova Scotia in 2012. Severn Cullis-Suzuki NDP Critic for the Environment, Northern Development, Born November 30, 1979, in Vancouver, BC., Aboriginal Affairs, Public Works and Government Ser- Contact: #103, 287 Lacewood Dr., Halifax, NS B3M Cullis-Suzuki is the daughter of geneticist and environ- vices, Western Economic Diversification and Transport. 1Y7; Phone: (902) 227-5245; URL: mental advocate Dr. David Suzuki and Dr. Tara Cullis. She was re-elected in the same riding in the 2011 and www.silverdonaldcameron.ca 2015 elections. She did not seek re-election in 2019. Currently: An environmental activist, author, speaker Adriane Carr and presenter serving on Board of Directors for the Career: Educated at the University of Alberta, and at Born in 1952, in Vancouver, BC Haida Gwaii Higher Education Society & the David Dalhousie University. Before entering politics, Duncan was best known for establishing Alberta’s Environmental Currently: City Councillor in Vancouver. Suzuki Foundation, as well as the council of the Earth Charter Initiative. She is also host of the APTN series Law Centre in 1982. The Centre has a mandate to pro- Career: Earned a master’s degree in urban geography Samaqan - Water Stories, which describes water issues vide public programs, research services and other ser- from the University of British Columbia in 1980. Carr for the First Nations. vices for a fee, with the aim of promoting effective taught for 12 years at Langara College in Vancouver, environmental laws and policies, and public participation served on the Langara Faculty Association Board, and Career: Completed her B.Sc. in Ecology and Evolution- in the law-making and decision-making process. In served as Chair of the Department of Interdisciplinary ary Biology at Yale University, 2002, and a Masters de- 1987, Duncan spent a year with Environment Canada, Studies for several years. In 1989, she joined the execu- gree in Ethnobotany at the University of Victoria. and later worked as the assistant Deputy Minister for tive of the Western Canada Wilderness Committee – a Cullis-Suzuki began her career as co-host of Suzuki’s Renewable Resources in the Yukon territorial govern- group founded by her husband, Paul George. Nature Quest, which aired on the Discovery Channel in ment. Her main focus has been the development and 2002. The same year, she helped found The Skyfish implementation of enforcement guidelines and mecha- Political Career: In 1983, she co-founded the BC Project, an Internet-based think tank which in 2002 pre- Green Party (the first Green Party in North America), nisms. Duncan has served on the Edmonton Social sented their Recognition of Responsibility pledge to the Planning Council, Alberta’s Clean Air Strategic Alliance, and co-founded the Green Party of Vancouver in 1984. World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johan- She led the BC Green Party from 2000-2006, and in and was a member of the board of the Sierra Legal De- nesburg, South Africa. The group disbanded in 2004. fence Fund (now Ecojustice) for several years. Before 2006 co-chaired the successful campaign to elect Eliza- While still in elementary school, Cullis-Suzuki estab- beth May as Leader of the Green Party of Canada. She her service as a politician, Duncan authored books in lished the Environmental Children’s Organization (ECO), the field of environmental law, including Effective Envi- served as May’s Deputy Leader from 2006-2014. Carr a children’s group which focused on learning and teach- ran in the 2008 and 2011 federal elections, but lost both ronmental Enforcement (1997) and Enforcing ing young people about environmental issues. The Environmental Law (1990). times. group made a presentation to the 1992 Earth Summit in Contact: City Hall, 453 West 12th Ave., 3rd Fl., Vancou- Rio de Janeiro, and Cullis-Suzuki’s speech to the dele- Awards: 1989 YWCA Award of Merit; lifetime member- ver, BC V5Y 1V4; Phone: (604) 873-7245; Fax: (604) gation earned her high praise. She continues to be a ship in the Preservation of Agricultural Land Association; 873-7750; Email: [email protected]; Twitter: twit- Champion for the initiative. In 1993, she was named to 1998 Award of Merit from the U.S. Environmental Pro- ter.com/AdrianeCarr. the United Nations Environment Program’s Global 500 tection Agency; 2004 Emerald Environmental Award. Roll of Honor for her efforts. The same year, her book Contact: Twitter: twitter.com/LindaDuncanAB David Chernushenko Tell the World, an environmental guide for families, was Born in Calgary, AB published by Doubleday; more recently, Cullis-Suzuki Stewart Elgie Currently: A politician, writer and environmental activist. has published several books in Japan and was a co-edi- tor and contributor for Notes from Canada’s Young Ac- Currently: Associate Director, Institute of the Environ- Career: Received his B.A. in political science from tivists (2007). Currently her initiatives include: “I’m Only ment, University of Ottawa; Associate Professor, Faculty Queen’s University and his M.A. from Cambridge Uni- a Child, but...” video series; Samaqan: Water Stories of Law, University of Ottawa. versity in International Relations. Chernushenko has television show; the Earth Charter initiative; and others. served as a member on several Canadian and interna- Career: Educated at Duke University, the University of Western Ontario, Harvard University (LL.M.), and Yale tional environmental committees, including the Interna- Contact: c/o Speakers’ Spotlight, #302, 179 John St., University (J.S.D.), Prof. Elgie’s current research fo- tional Olympic Committee’s commission on Sport and Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1X4; Phone: 1-800-333-4453; cuses on the economics of environmental protection. the Environment, from 1998 to 2004, and Canada’s Na- URL: severncullissuzuki.com; Facebook: Elgie is a former part-time instructor at Osgoode Hall tional Round Table on the Environment and the Econ- www.facebook.com/SevernCullisSuzuki; Law School and at the law faculties of the University of omy, from 2006 to 2009. He is co-founder of the charity Twitter: twitter.com/SevernSuzuki Alberta and the University of British Columbia. He is a Clean Air Champions, which partners with athletes to member of the Bars of Ontario, British Columbia and raise awareness about air pollution, climate change and Fin Donnelly Alaska. Professor Elgie is the founder of Canada’s larg- the benefits of physical activity. He has directed three Born May 27, 1966, in New Westminster, BC.
E-2 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Canadian Environmentalists est non-profit environmental law organization, Ecojustice Career: Galdikas was awarded a dual degree (B.Sc. mate-gate” and global warming-related issues on (formerly the Sierra Legal Defence Fund); Ecojustice Psychology, B.Sc. Zoology) jointly from the University of DeSmogBlog. He is also a certified NationBuilder Expert possesses a mandate to set legal precedents and to British Colombia and the University of California, Los and was named one of the top 50 tweeters on climate 2020 Up-Date Environmental represent environmental organizations and concerned Angeles, in 1967. She proceeded to receive an M.A. change and environmental issues. individuals in the battle to preserve the Earth. The firm and a Ph.D. in anthropology from UCLA in 1969 and Contact: Phone: (778) 878-6606, Email: works at the grassroots level and will take on cases at 1978, respectively. Initially sponsored by the National [email protected], URL: spakemedia.com, Twit- any level of the courts. Ecojustice frequently partners Geographic Society and supported by influential ter: twitter.com/kgrandia, Facebook: with other advocacy groups and has worked with The primatologist Louis Leakey, Galdikas afterwards trav- www.facebook.com/spakemedia David Suzuki Foundation, Greenpeace Canada, The elled to Borneo, where she commenced her pioneering World Wildlife Fund of Canada and The Pembina Insti- work in the first-hand study of wild orangutans. She tute, among others. Elgie is also the founding Executive founded the Orangutan Foundation International in Steven Guilbeault Director of the Canadian Boreal Trust and a past Chair 1986. Since, Galdikas has become an advocate for the Born 1970 in La Tuque, QC. of Canada’s National Advisory Committee under the preservation of natural ecosystems and rainforest habi- Currently: MP for the riding of Laurier—Sainte-Marie in NAFTA environmental side agreement. He is the tats, speaking out against the destructive effects of log- the House of Commons; Minister of Canadian Heritage. founder and Chair of Sustainable Prosperity, a research ging, industrial plantations, mining, and human-caused and policy network at the University of Ottawa, fires. Today, Galdikas is a Full Professor in the Depart- Career: Guilbeault is a past Coordinator for Greenpeace dedicated to practical solutions and strategies for ment of Archaeology at Simon Fraser University in Brit- Canada’s climate and energy campaign and has served building a productive yet environmentally sustainable ish Columbia and Professor Extraordinaire at in the same capacity for Greenpeace International. Canadian economy. Universitas Nasional in Jakarta, Indonesia, from where Within Quebec, Guilbeault served as president for the she still carries out studies at the Tanjung Putting Quebec Coalition for Climate Change and as vice-presi- Awards: Medal for exceptional lifetime contributions, National Park. dent of the Conseil regional de l’environnement de awarded by the Law Society of Upper Canada in 2001. Montréal. He has been actively involved in United Na- Awards: In 1995, Galdikas was appointed an Officer of Contact: c/o Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa, #353, tions initiatives and meetings on climate change, and the Order of Canada. Her other awards include Indone 57 Louis Pasteur St., Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5; Phone: - co-chaired the Climate Action Network for five years. He sia’s Hero for the Earth Award (Kalpataru), the Tyler (613) 562-5800, Ext. 2525; Fax (613) 562-5124, e-mail: was co-founder and senior director of Équiterre, and has Prize for Environmental Achievement, the Institute of [email protected]; URL: llmphd.uottawa.ca been a contributor to media outlets such as Métro, Ra- Human Origins Science Award, the PETA Humanitarian dio-Canada, La Presse and Corporate Knights Award, the United Nations Global 500 Award, the Sierra Magazine. Thomas Esakin Club Chico Mendes Award, the Eddie Bauer Hero for Books: Le Prochain Virage (avec François Tanguay); Currently: Principal at Sustainability Change Solutions the Earth award, the Chevron Conservation Award, the Alerte! Le Québec à l’heure des changements (scs-canada.com), a private consulting firm based in To- Pride of Lithuania Award, the Gold Medal for Conserva- climatiques (2009). ronto; Director-General of Sustainability Change Solu- tion from the Chester Zoological Society, the Explorer tions de México; professor and Academic Co-ordinator and Leadership Award from the Royal Geographic Soci- Awards: Impératif français award, 2016; Université de in the G. Raymond Chang School of Continuing Educa- ety of Spain, Indonesia’s Satya Lencana Pembangunan Montréal’s Medal for Lifetime Achievement, 2012; Qué- tion at Ryerson University’s Sustainability program. Medal, and both the Queen Elizabeth II Commemorative bec Cercle des Phénix de l’environnement, 2009; and Jubilee medals. She also received the key to the France’s Le Monde magazine named Guilbeault one of Career: Educated at Simon Fraser University, with a city of Las Vegas, Nevada in 2009. Featured twice on the top 50 newsmakers in global sustainable develop- Bachelor’s degree in Political Science and Philosophy; the cover of National Geographic and regularly in an as- ment. the University of Saskatchewan; and at Staffordshire sortment of television documentaries, Galdikas was also University, achieving a Master’s degree in Sustainable the principal focus of the 2011 documentary Born to be Contact: Steven Guilbeault, MP for Laurier—Sainte-Ma- Development. Esakin is a former professor at Mexico’s Wild 3D, narrated by Morgan Freeman. rie, House of Commons, Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6; Phone: Universidad del Caribe, located in Cancun, where he (613) 992-6779; Fax: (613) 995-8461; e-mail: Ste- taught in the Sustainable Tourism department and in the Books: Reflections of Eden: My Years with the Orang- [email protected]; URL: English department. He is a past Executive Director of utans of Borneo (1996); Orangutan Odyssey (1999); stevenguilbeault.libparl.ca. JUMP Math, the inaugural Director of the Clayoquot Bio- and Great Ape Odyssey (2005). sphere Trust, and Executive Director of the Canadian In- Contact: Phone: (778) 782-3225; Fax: (778) 782-5666; Toby Heaps stitute for Environmental Law and Policy (CIELAP) prior e-mail: [email protected]; URL: orang- to its integration with environmental resource library of Currently: Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of utan.org; biruteinfo.weebly.com; Twitter: twit- Corporate Knights. Launched in 2002, and dubbed “the CELA. CIELAP was a not-for-profit environmental think ter.com/drbirute tank with a mandate to provide solutions-based re- magazine for clean capitalism,” Corporate Knights is search, education, and guidance to policy makers in now the world’s largest circulation magazine with a fo- government, business, and academia. Esakin has Kevin Grandia cus on responsible corporate practices and social and served as a policy advisor on sustainable development Currently: Founder and President of Spake Media environmental sustainability. Heaps makes regular ap- to the Canadian government and most recently de- House Inc., an online hub that promotes non-profit and pearances on the CBC and continues to provide com- signed and taught Toronto’s George Brown College’s advocacy groups through online communications, mentary to national publications such as The Globe and first Sustainability course. Esakin has written with partic- emails, online advertising and web marketing. Mail, Financial Times and the Wall Street Journal. He ular focus on the areas of sustainable development sits on the Sustainability Accounting Standards Advisory Career: Educated in Psychology as Simon Fraser Uni- leadership and strategies, local agenda development Board, the University of Toronto’s Environment and versity before beginning at the Department of Foreign and benchmarking, and educating for sustainability, Finance Committee, and is a director at Ashoka Affairs and International Trade of Canada. From there, cultivating a persistent research interest in the Canada. Grandia worked for the Premier of British Columbia and sustainable development of Mexico. was trained by Al Gore as part of The Climate Project, Career: Educated at McGill University, with a Bachelor’s Publications: Author of e-book México and Sustainable an initiative designed to produce informed climate degree in Economics, and at the London School of Eco- Development: Ideas founded in youth (2008); numerous change activists. From 2006-08, Grandia maintained nomics and Political Science. book chapters, reports, case studies and poems. DeSmogBlog.com for the Hoggan & Associates public Contact: c/o Corporate Knights, #207, 147 Spadina Contact: URL: www.thomasesakin.com relations firm, debunking personalities and organizations Ave., Toronto, ON M5V 2L7; Phone: (416) 203-4674; that dismiss or suppress empirical data on climate Fax: (416) 946-1770; e-mail: inqui- change, and in 2008 he co-founded Vote for Environ- [email protected]; URL: Biruté Galdikas ment, a new online election tool that was nominated for www.corporateknights.ca Born May 10, 1946, in Wiesbaden, Germany; grew up in a World Summit Award for best e-Content and innova- Toronto, Canada. tive ICT applications. In 2010, he moved to Washington, Kathryn Holloway D.C. to work as the Director of Online Strategy for Currently: Galdikas is a conservationist and Born October 18, 1968, in Montréal, QC. primatologist internationally recognized as a key figure Greenpeace, USA. In 2012, Grandia founded Spake Currently: A journalist, consultant, businesswoman and in primatology and as an academic authority on the Media House Inc., a public relations firm that provides political activist. Bornean orangutan. She is founder and President of the special service to organizations in the nonprofit sector. Orangutan Foundation International. Awards: In 2013, Rolling Stone Magazine named him a Political Career: Was a campaign organizer for the On- “Green Hero” for his digital campaign blogs against “cli- tario Liberal Party, working with candidate Han Dong
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-3 Canadian Environmentalists who ran in the Trinity—Spadina constituency in 2014. 67 Erb St. West, Waterloo, ON N2L 6C2; Phone: (226) UK. Kerr became the Executive Director of Greenpeace Was a candidate for the Liberal Party in the Trin- 772-3092, URL: www.homerdixon.com. Canada in 2013. Previously she had been Chief Execu- ity—Spadina constituency in the 2007 Ontario general tive at ActionAid International in South Africa, a charity election, finishing second to the NDP incumbent Rosario Emily Hunter whose main goal is to wipe out world poverty. She was Marchese. Holloway was also a staff organizer for the Born May 20, 1984, in Vancouver, BC. also a policy director at Oxfam Canada, and the Execu- Green Party of Canada, 2004 to 2005, and later sup- tive Eirector of the Association of Women’s Rights in De- ported Elizabeth May in the race for the leadership of Currently: Hunter is an environmental activist, having velopment. She was the The Executive Director of the Party. She joined the Liberal Party in late 2006. taken part in the Canadian Youth Climate Coalition, Greenpeace Canada from 2013-2018. Kerr has also EarthRoots and the Greenpeace Tar Sands project. She Career: Educated at the University of Toronto, Holloway served as a board member for several organizations, in- is currently an environmental speaker, writer, and film- cluding Gender at Work, The Nobel Women’s Initiative has been involved in a number of environmental organi- maker. She is founder of Eco-Warrior Productions, a zations and initiatives, including the Steering Committee and the Society for International Development and he media company that promotes environmental issues. In Match International Women’s Fund. of Green Enterprise Toronto (a member of the BALLE 2014 they released the documentary series Activism network), the Civic Efficiency Group, the United Nations 2.0, which focuses on environmentalists who use digital Books: Ours by Right: Women’s Rights As Human Environment Programme Sustainable Energy Finance technology in order to further their causes. Rights (1993); co-author of: The Future of Women’s Roundtable, and the United Nations Climate Change Rights: Global Visions and Strategies (2004) and De- Conference. She is a founding member of the Toronto Career: Hunter began her career at age 20, joining a manding Dignity: Women confronting Economic Re- Women’s Environmental Alliance and BALLE Canada campaign started by the Sea Shepherd Conservation forms in Africa (2000). (Business Alliance for Local Living Economies). Hollo- Society to protect the Galapagos Marine Reserve. She Contact: c/o MakeWay, 400-163 W Hastings St., Van- way is a co-founder of Village Technologies, a To also took part in an effort to stop whaling in Japan for - couver, BC V6B 1H5; Phone: (604) 647-6611; URL: ronto-based renewable energy firm, and a past the same organization. It was with the Sea Shepherd makeway.org; Twitter: twitter.com/joannadkerr; LinkedIn: President and CEO of Carbonzero. Holloway was the Conservation Society that she was featured on the real- ca.linkedin.com/in/joanna-kerr-bb011b71 Executive Director of Element Village, a not-for-profit or- ity show Whale Wars. She was previously a national ganization with a focus on supporting energy demand campaigner for the 350.org group, and for United Con- reduction initiatives at a grassroots level. Element Vil- servationists to raise awareness about various environ- Naomi Klein lage worked with neighbourhoods, cooperatives and mental issues. She has also served as the Born May 8, 1970, in Montréal, QC. eco-correspondent for MTV Canada, and as a media larger communities to promote renewable energy, alter- Currently: Klein is a bestselling and internationally re- strategist for the Toronto Tool Library. natives to the use of fossil fuels, food security programs, nowned public intellectual known for her books and jour- and similar projects. She was Vice-President of Books: The Next Eco-Warriors (2011). nalism on feminism, anti-capitalism, and the Corporate Development at SusGlobal Energy from Contact: Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ecohuntress; anti-globalization movement. She is also a Senior Corre- 2016-2019. The Intercept Twitter: twitter.com/ecohuntress; LinkedIn: spondent for , as well as a contributor to The Nation, The New York Times, The New Yorker, The Contact: LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/holloway ca.linkedin.com/in/ecohuntress Boston Globe, The Guardian, The London Review of Books, and Le Monde. Thomas Homer-Dixon Mark Jaccard Born 1956 in Victoria, BC. Career: Klein attended the University of Toronto but Currently: Professor at the School of Resource and En- dropped out before completing her degree, leaving to Currently: Professor, Faculty of Environment, University vironmental Management at Simon Fraser University. pursue internships at The Globe and Mail and at This of Waterloo; Chair of Global Systems, Centre for Inter- Magazine. In 2013, Time Magazine named Klein’s first national Governance & Innovation at the Balsillie School Career: Educated to Ph.D. level at the Energy, Econom- ics, and Policy Institute at the University of Grenoble. Dr. book, No Logo, one of the Top 100 non-fiction books of International Affairs, Waterloo. His research is inter- published since 1923, and The Literary Review of Can- disciplinary and focuses on the themes of global secu- Jaccard develops and applies energy-economy models to assess sustainable energy and materials policies. A ada later included it on their list of the hundred most im- rity, technological, economic and ecological change, and portant Canadian books ever published. In 2004, her how human society will adapt to a complex and chang- professor in REM since 1986, Mark served as Chair and CEO of the BC Utilities Commission (1992-97), on the Harper’s reporting on Iraq won the James Aronson ing global picture as environmental and security issues Award for Social Justice Journalism, and her documen- continue to coalesce. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1993-96), and on the China Council for International Cooperation tary The Take, about Argentinean worker’s demonstra- Career: Educated at Carleton University (B.A. Political on Environment and Development (1996-2001). He was tions, was an Official Selection of the Venice Biennale Science, 1980) and at MIT (Ph.D. Political Science, a lead author on the Global Energy Assessment (2012), and won the Best Documentary Jury Prize at the AFI 1989), where he focused on issues relating to defense a member of Canada’s National Roundtable on the En- Film Festival. Today, Klein is on the board of directors and arms control policy, conflict theory, and international vironment and the Economy, and a special advisor to for the group 350.org, a global grassroots movement to relations. At the University of Toronto, Homer-Dixon led Canada’s Council of Chief Executive Officers. In 2007, put an end to the climate crisis, and in addition serves research projects studying the connections between en- he won the SFU President’s Award for Media and his as a Puffin Foundation Writing Fellow at the The Nation vironmental problems and the internal security of devel- book, Sustainable Fossil Fuels, won the Donner Prize Institute. She is also one of the organizers and authors oping countries. He remains at the forefront of an for best policy book in Canada. Dr. Jaccard is responsi- of the Leap Manifesto, which advocates for greater In- evolving global discourse on the links between threats to ble for the Canadian Industrial Energy End-use Data digenous rights and the embracing of new energy tech- the environment and threats to human security. Before and Analysis Centre, directed by Dr. John Nyboer, nologies. In 2017, she was appointed to the advisory joining the Basillie School of International Affairs, he University Research Associate. panel of the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025. She held the George Ignatieff Chair of Peace and Conflict now holds an honourary Doctor of Civil Laws from the Studies at the Trudeau Centre for Peace and Conflict Awards: Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, 2009; University of King’s College, Nova Scotia, and in 2011 Studies, University of Toronto, and was Professor in the British Columbia Academic of the Year, 2008. she also received an honourary degree from Saint Political Science department of the University. He was Books: Hot Air: Meeting Canada’s Climate Change Thomas University. Klein is a former Miliband Fellow at also the Founding Director of the Waterloo Institute for Challenge; Sustainable Fossil Fuels: The Unusual Sus- the London School of Economics. Complexity and Innovation between 2009 and 2014. pect in the Quest for Clean and Enduring Energy; The Awards: Klein’s second book, The Shock Doctrine, was Books: Carbon Shift: How the Twin Crises of Oil Deple- Cost of Climate Policy. the 2008/09 winner of the Warwick Prize for Writing. tion & Climate Change Will Define the Future Contact: School of Resource and Environmental Man- Klein is also a winner of the Canadian National Business (2009);The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, agement, Simon Fraser University, TASC 1, #8405, Book Award (2000) and of the French Prix Mediations and the Renewal of Civilization (winner of the National 8888 University Dr., Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6; Phone: Award (2000) for No Logo. A short six-minute compan- Business Book Award for 2006); The Ingenuity Gap (778)782-4219; Fax: (778) 782-4968; e-mail: ion film to The Shock Doctrine, directed by Academy (winner of the Governor General’s Award for Non-fiction, [email protected]; URL: www.emrg.sfu.ca; Award-winning filmmaker Alfonso Cuarón, screened and 2001); and Environment, Scarcity, and Violence (winner markjaccard.blogspot.ca was an Official Selection at the 2007 Venice Biennale, of the 2000 Lynton Caldwell Prize from the American San Sebastien, and Toronto International Film Festivals. Political Science Association). His other published works Joanna Kerr A full-length documentary based on the same book, also include Population and Conflict (1994), and Environ- titled The Shock Doctrine and directed by Michael mental Scarcity and Global Security (1993). Currently: President & CEO of MakeWay (formerly Winterbottom, was released in 2009. This Changes Ev- known as Tides Canada). erything: Capitalism vs. the Climate was awarded the Contact: c/o Balsillie School of International Affairs, Hilary Weston Writers’ Trust Prize for Nonfiction and Centre for International Governance Innovation, #312, Career: Earned her B.A. from the University of Toronto and her M.A. from the University of Sussex in Brighton, was named one of the New York Times 100 notable
E-4 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Canadian Environmentalists books of 2014. A documentary based on the book, di- Facebook: www.facebook.com/HarveyLockeWild; ety of corporations and lobby groups and is a rected by Avi Lewis, premiered at the Toronto Interna- LinkedIn: ca.linkedin.com/pub/harvey-locke/34/822/135 spokesperson for nuclear energy. niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental tional Film Festival in 2015. Klein was awarded the Career: Moore holds a B.Sc. in Forest Biology from the International Studies Association’s IPE Outstanding Ac- Elizabeth May University of British Columbia and Ph.D. in Ecology from tivist-Scholar award in 2014, and Australia’s Sydney Born June 9, 1954, in Hartford, Connecticut; moved to UBC’s Institute of Resource Ecology (1972). Starting in Peace Prize in 2016. Nova Scotia in 1972. 1971, Moore was an environmental activist for Books: No Logo (1999); Fences & Windows: Dis- Greenpeace, serving as Greenpeace Canada’s Presi- Currently: MP for the riding of Saanich—Gulf Islands. patches from the Front Lines of the Globalization De- dent for nine years and Director of Greenpeace Interna- bate (2002); The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Political Career: Appointed Senior Policy Advisor to tional for ten. Due to differences with the group, Capitalism (2007); This Changes Everything: Capitalism then-federal Environment Minister Tom McMillan in recounted in his book Confessions of a Greenpeace vs. the Climate (2014); o Is Not Enough: Resisting 1986. On August 26, 2006, May won the Green Party of Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist,he Trump’s Shock Politics and Winning the World We Need Canada leadership election on the first ballot, and departed in 1986. In 1990, he founded and was principal (2017); The Battle for Paradise: Puerto Rico Takes on served as leader until 2019. May entered the 2008 fed- chairperson for the BC Carbon Project. From 1990-94, the Disaster Capitalists (2018); and On Fire: The (Burn- eral election race in the Nova Scotia constituency Cen- Moore was appointed to British Columbia’s Round Table ing) Case for a Green New Deal (2019) tral Nova, losing to incumbent Peter MacKay. In the on the Environment and Economy, and he later served 2011 election, she won the riding of Saanich—Gulf Is- as Vice President of Environment for Waterfurnace In- Contact: URL: naomiklein.org; Facebook: lands in Sidney, BC, making her the first Green Party ternational, a private manufacturer of sustainable, re- www.facebook.com/naomikleinofficial; Twitter: twit- candidate to be elected to the House of Commons. She newable resource-compatible technology for residential ter.com/NaomiAKlein was re-elected in her riding in the 2015 and 2019 use. More recently, he has served as Chair of the Sus- general elections. tainable Forestry Committee of the Forest Alliance of BC Harvey Locke Career: May is a lawyer by profession, graduating from and founded the Allow Golden Rice Society, a non-profit Born May 22, 1959, in Calgary, AB. the Dalhousie University Law School in 1983. Officer of that petitions Greenpeace to make exemptions to its Currently: Locke, a lawyer by profession, is a the Order of Canada since 2005. Executive Director of zero-tolerance policy on genetic modification. Moore’s well-known conservationist, lecturer, writer and photog- the Sierra Club of Canada, 1989-2006. Recipient of views have drawn criticism from the many environmen- rapher. He is recognized around the world as a leader in many awards including the Outstanding Achievement tal activists today: while not refuting the existence of cli- the field of wilderness protection and the conservation of Award from the Sierra Club in 1989, the International mate change, Moore maintains that global warming is parklands. Locke’s photographic work has been pub- Conservation Award from the Friends of Nature, and the not a product of human activity. Rather than invest their lished widely in a variety of media, including The New United Nations Global 500 Award in 1990. In 1996, she energies into curbing the human effect on the York Times, Agence France Press, The Globe and Mail was presented with the award for Outstanding Leader- environment, Moore suggests, environmentalists should and Canadian Geographic. Currently, he is the principal ship in Environmental Education by the Ontario Society promote adaptation to what is a fundamentally natural for Harvey Locke Consulting, a strategic advisor for the for Environmental Education. May, a co-founder of the process. Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative, and a se- Canadian Environmental Defence Fund, has been ac- Awards: Moore is a recipient of a Ford Foundation Fel- nior advisor on conservation for the Canadian Parks and tive with organizations such as the Public Interest Advo- lowship (1969-1972). Wilderness Society (CPAWS). Previously, he served on cacy Centre, Pollution Probe, and Friends of the Earth. Books: Pacific Spirit: The Forest Reborn (1995); Green the boards of the Henry P. Kendall Foundation in She is also a former Vice Chair of the National Round Spirit: Trees are the Answer (photo-book) (2000); Con- Boston, Massachusetts, the Freedom to Roam Initiative, Table on the Environment and the Economy. and the Eighth and Ninth World Wilderness Congress. fessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Books: Budworm Battles: The Fight to Stop the Aerial Locke is an active member of the World Commission on Sensible Environmentalist (2011). Insecticide Spraying of the Forests of Eastern Canada Protected Areas. Contact: URL: ecosense.me; Facebook: (with Richard Rogers) (1982); Paradise Won: The Strug- www.facebook.com/goldenricenow; Twitter: twit- Career: Educated at the University of Calgary, receiving gle to Save South Moresby (1990); At the Cutting Edge: ter.com/EcoSenseNow a Bachelor’s degree in French and a Bachelor of Laws The Crisis in Canada’s Forests (1998); Frederick Street: degree. Locke is the founder of the Yellowstone to Yu- Life and Death on Canada’s Love Canal (with Maude kon Conservation Initiative, which promotes the creation Barlow) (2000); How to Save the World in Your Spare Joyce Murray of a wildlife corridor from Yellowstone National Park to Time (2006); Global Warming for Dummies (with Zoe Born July 11, 1954, in Schweizer-Reneke, North West, the Yukon. He practiced law in Calgary for 14 years be- Caron) (2009); Losing Confidence: Power, Politics and South Africa; immigrated to Canada in 1961. fore changing careers to become a full-time conserva- the Crisis in Canadian Democracy (2009); and Who We Currently: MP for the riding of Vancouver Quadra in the tionist. Locke is a past President and Vice President of Are: Reflections on My Life and Canada (2014). the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS), House of Commons; Minister of Digital Government. Awards: May is the recipient of several honourary de- a former board member of the Nature Conservancy of Political Career: Murray entered politics in 2001, with grees, including doctorates from Mount Saint Vincent Montana, and has served various other environmental her election to the Legislative Assembly of British Co- University in Halifax, the University of New Brunswick, and conservation organizations such as the Wildlands lumbia, where she served as a Liberal cabinet minister Mount Allison University in Sackville, NB and the Atlan- Project (Wildlands Network), Tides Canada Foundation, from 2001-2005. She was first elected to Parliament in tic School of Theology in Halifax, NS. She was made an and the Canadian Boreal Initiative. As a writer and pho- 2008, and subsequently re-elected in 2011, 2015 and Officer of the Order of Canada in 2005, received the tographer, his work has been published in national and 2019. She has served on Standing Committees on Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal in 2012, and international peer-reviewed journals. In 2009, he ad- Trade, Health, Fisheries and Oceans, Environment and was named Maclean’s Parliamentarian of the Year in dressed the WILD9 Congress in Mérida, Mexico. He ran Sustainable Development, and Defence. She currently 2012 and 2013. for the MP of Calgary Centre as a Liberal candidate in sits on the Standing Committees on Access to Informa- the 2012 national by-election. Locke continues to Contact: Elizabeth May, MP for Saanich—Gulf Islands, tion, Privacy and Ethics, Public Accounts and Govern- contribute to the dialogue on current environment and House of Commons, Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6; Phone: ment Operations and Estimates. She presented climate change issues. (613) 996-1119; Fax: (613) 996-0850; e-mail: eliza- legislation banning crude oil tanker traffic from BC’s [email protected]; Facebook: Awards: Named one of Canada’s leaders for the 21st North Coast, and increasing accountability and transpar- www.facebook.com/elizabethmay.green, century by Time Magazine Canada in 1999. He was ency of Canada’s security and intelligence agencies. Twitter: twitter.com/elizabethmay awarded the J.B. Harkin Medal for Conservation and the She also served as Parliamentary Secretary to the Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal in 2013. President of the Treasury Board. Locke then received the Fred M. Packard Award for out- Patrick Moore Career: Murray co-founded Brinkman and Associates standing service to protected areas by the IUCN World Born 1947 in Winter Harbour, BC. Reforestation Ltd. in 1979 with her husband Dirk Brink- Commission on Protected Areas at the World Parks Currently: Moore is the founder of the Vancouver public man, specializing in ecosystem restoration, urban refor- Congress and the Gold Leaf Award from the Canadian relations firm Greenspirit Strategies, which provides estation, and forest management, among other services. Council on Ecological Areas. seminars to the public, lobbies government representa- The company is now an international operation, and has Contact: c/o The Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation tives, mobilizes popular action around conservation and planted over one billion trees. Initiative, #200, 1240 Railway Ave., Canmore, AB T1W climate change issues, and serves as an environmental Contact: Joyce Murray, MP for Vancouver Quadra, 1P4; Phone: (403) 609-2666; e-mail: resource for both government and the private sector. House of Commons, Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6; Phone: [email protected]; URL: www.harveylocke.com; Moore primarily consults and publicly speaks for a vari- (613) 992-2430; Fax: (613) 995-0770; e-mail: [email protected]; URL: jmurray.liberal.ca;
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-5 Canadian Environmentalists
Facebook: www.facebook.com/mpjoycemurray; Twitter: Currently: Adjunct professor at the University of British individuals. She has been active on the boards of Ever- twitter.com/joycemurray; LinkedIn: Columbia and Simon Fraser University. City Councillor green, Pollution Probe, Windshare, and Algonquin www.linkedin.com/in/mp-joyce-murray in Vancouver and Director at Metro Vancouver. Ecowatch, and is a life member of the Bruce Trail Con- servancy. Dr. Saxe is a founding member of the Law So Political Career: Served on Vancouver City Council - ciety of Upper Canada’s Environmental Specialist Briony Penn from 2008-2008. Born October 16, 1960, in Saanich, BC. Certification Committee, and a long-time member of the Career: In 2002, she was elected as a Green Party Ontario Bar Association Environmental Law section. In Currently: Adjunct Professor of Environmental Studies, School Board member, where she worked in the Pri- 2015, Saxe was named the Environmental University of Victoria. Her study program on the sandhill mary/Secondary education industry for three years. She Commissioner of Ontario and served until 2019. crane, a species at risk, continues under the aegis of was then a director at CCEC Credit Union until ap- Books: Ontario Environmental Protection Act Annotated University’s Geography Department. Penn is an environ- pointed as the Chair of the City’s Planning and Environ- (1990). Dr. Saxe is also the author of numerous articles mental activist, cartographer, artist, and ment Committee in 2008, where she also became the and book chapters. businesswoman. Council lead to oversee Vancouver’s Greenest City Ac- Career: Penn earned her B.A. in Geography and An- tion Plan. She served as a Health and Social Develop- Awards: Ontario Bar Association Distinguished Service thropology from the University of British Columbia, and ment Advisory Committee Member from 2007 to 2014. Award, 2010; Osgoode Hall Gold Key Award for lifetime later a Ph.D. in Geography from Edinburgh University in She reinstated the Joint Childcare Council in 2009, achievement in law. Scotland. She established an environmental education which has since increased childcare spaces in Vancou- Contact: URL: saxefacts.com consulting business in 1986 and was the host of the ver by six per cent. She was also the Executive Director of the Wilderness Committee, and was chosen by Al television program Enviro/Mental. Penn is the author of Rick Smith a number of books and articles on natural history and Gore to give PowerPoint presentations on his documen- environmental issues. She is the co-founder of The tary An Inconvenient Truth. She volunteered with Currently: Executive Director of the Broadbent Institute, Land Conservancy of British Columbia and has volun- Women’s Voters Congress, and she was a former an organization looking to make free, equal and com- teered her time to many local and provincial organiza- Co-Chair of the City of Vancouver’s Food Policy Council. passionate citizenship in Canada. tions with a focus on conservation and related issues, Currently, she is on the Vancouver Foundation’s Health and Social Development Advisory Committee. Political Career: Served as Chief of Staff to Jack including the Raincoast Conservation Foundation, Stew- Layton and the New Democratic Party in 2003. ardship Pledge, and the Environment Advisory Commit- Contact: URL: sppga.ubc.ca/profile/andrea-reimer; tee, Islands Trust Saltspring Island Local Trust Twitter: twitter.com/andreareimer; LinkedIn: Career: Awarded Ph.D. in biology from the University of Committee. In 2007, she announced her intention to run ca.linkedin.com/in/andreareimer Guelph in 1999. Until January 2013, he was the Execu- as a Liberal candidate in the constituency of tive Director of Environmental Defence Canada, a chari- table organization dedicated to protecting the Saanich—Gulf Islands in the 2008 federal election. Sidney Ribaux Penn was narrowly defeated by incumbent Gary Lunn. environment and human health. Smith, along with others She maintains her membership in the Green Party of Currently: Ribaux is Executive Director, spokesperson in the organization, worked towards passage of On- BC. and co-founder of the Montréal nonprofit Équiterre, an tario’s new Clean Water Act and the Endangered Spe- organization engaged in the promotion of fair trade poli- cies Act. Former Executive Director of the UK and Books: Islands in the Salish Sea: A Community Atlas; A cies, energy efficiency, responsible consumption, pollu- Canadian offices of the International Fund for Animal Year on the Wild Side; The Kids Book of Canadian Ge- tion control, and in the reconstruction of a Montréal Welfare. ography; The Real Thing: The Natural History of Ian citizens’ movement. McTaggart Cowan; and For the Love of Nature: Solu- Books: Toxin Toxout: Getting Harmful Chemicals Out of tions for Biodiversity. Career: Ribaux co-founded Équiterre in 1993 and Our Bodies and Our World (with Bruce Lourie) (2013); chaired the Board of Directors until 1998, when he grad- Slow Death by Rubber Duck: How the Toxic Chemistry Contact: URL: www.brionypenn.com uated to Executive Director. Ribaux also chaired the Re- of Everyday Life Affects Our Health (with Bruce Lourie) gional Environmental Council of Montréal from 1996 to (2009). Gord Perks 2003, working with grassroots citizens’ coalitions to raise Contact: PO Box 1273, Stn B, Ottawa, ON K1P 5R3; Currently: City councillor for Ward 14, Parkdale—High popular support of the Kyoto Protocol. In addition, Phone: (613) 688-2071; email: Park, in Toronto. Ribaux has overseen the design and construction of the [email protected]; URL: Centre for Sustainable Development, one of the green- www.broadbentinstitute.ca; Twitter: twitter.com/rjcsmith Political Career: Perks was first elected to Toronto city est buildings in Canada and a headquarters for a variety council in 2006, and was re-elected in 2010 and 2014. of Canadian environmental groups. His writing can be Prior to that, he ran in the 2006 federal election as the found published regularly in the Montréal Metro. David Suzuki NDP candidate in Toronto’s Davenport riding, losing to Born March 24, 1936, in Vancouver, BC. Liberal candidate Mario Silva. Awards: Ribaux was named a Fellow of Ashoka in 2007. In 2009, he received the Royal Canadian Geo- Currently: Host of CBC’s long-running science Career: Perks began working on environmental initia- graphical Society’s first Canadian Award for Environ- programme The Nature of Things, now in syndication in tives in 1987, with a focus on waste reduction and public mental Innovation, and he was most recently admitted 40+ countries. Active proponent of environmental transit, and has worked for such organizations as Pollu- by the society into its College of Fellows. sustainability and combating global warming. Professor tion Probe, Greenpeace Canada, the Better Transporta- Emeritus, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, tion Coalition, and the Toronto Environmental Alliance. Contact: Équiterre Headquarters, Centre for Sustain- 2001 to present. Left the board of directors of the David He was the Principal author of the Canadian Green able Development, #340, 50 rue Sainte-Catherine Suzuki Foundation in 2012 so that his political advocacy Consumer Guide (1989), an environmental columnist for Ouest, Montréal QC H2X 3V4; Phone: (514) 522-2000; would not affect the charitable organization status of the Eye Weekly (now The Grid), and an Adjunct Professor e-mail: [email protected]; URL: www.equiterre.org; foundation. in the Environmental Studies Department of the Univer- Twitter: twitter.com/sidneyribaux; LinkedIn: ca.linkedin.com/in/sidney-ribaux-06056714 Career: Ph.D. in zoology from the University of Chicago. sity of Toronto. He is currently a member of the follow- Professor in the Genetics Department of the University ing: Parks and Environment Committee; Subcommittee of British Columbia, 1963 to 2001. Established and on Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation; Tribunal Dianne Saxe hosted from 1975 to 1979 the CBC radio program Nominating Panel; Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Currently: Certified Specialist in Environmental Law; Quirks and Quarks. Director of the Canadian Civil Liber- Directors; Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming head of Saxe Law Office (Envirolaw) since 1991. ties Association, 1982-1987. Hosted the critically ac- Alliance; and Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Action claimed PBS television series The Secret of Life, 1993. Career: Educated at Osgoode Hall Law School with a committee. Co-founder, along with his wife Dr. Tara Cullis, and Ph.D. in Law and called to the Ontario Bar in 1976, Dr. member of the board of the David Suzuki Foundation Contact: Toronto City Hall, #A14, 100 Queen St. West, Saxe is recognized by her peers as among the top 25 (1990), a non-profit organization dedicated to finding in- Toronto, ON M5H 2N2; Phone: (416) 392-7919; Fax: environmental lawyers in the world. Before establishing novative solutions to help conserve the natural world. (416) 392-0398; e-mail: [email protected]; her own law firm, she was senior legal counsel to the URL: gordperks.ca; Facebook: Ontario Ministry of the Environment. Her firm’s core Awards: Honours include the Governor General’s www.facebook.com/Gord.Perks; Twitter: twit- practice areas include due diligence, compliance, en- Award for Conservation in 1985 and the Order of Can- ter.com/gordperks. forcement, renewable energy approvals, environmental ada in 1997; the Lifetime Achievement Award, Univer- assessments, ISO 14000, brownfields, and climate sity of British Columbia Alumni Association, 2000; and Andrea Reimer change. Dr. Saxe is a certified mediator and a consul- the Commemorative Medal, 125th Anniversary of Cana- tant to business, government, environmental groups and dian Confederation, 1992. Received ACTRA Award in
E-6 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Canadian Environmentalists
1985 and GEMINI Awards in 1986 and 1992 for his tele- Ecojustice. He was the Inaugural Hakai Chair of Envi- Watt-Cloutier was the International Chair of the ICC. vision programs. Dr. Suzuki is also the recipient of a ronmental Law and Sustainability at UVic Law, She continues to advocate for the interests of Arctic number of honourary degrees from Canadian and inter- 2011-2016, and was the Founding Executive Director of peoples with particular reference to the effects of green- 2020 Up-Date Environmental national universities, including most recently from Me- the Environmental Law Centre at the University of house gases and climate change on their wellbeing, as morial University, Laurentian University, and Université Victoria, home of the first clinical program in public well as to themes of human rights and the protection of Sainte-Anne. interest environmental law in Canada. indigenous cultures. Books: Author of more than 50 books, including his Books: Environmental Law: Cases and Materials (2009, Awards: Among her many honours, Watt-Cloutier was 2006 autobiography, David Suzuki; The Sacred Balance with Meinhard Doelle, 2nd edition); Setting the Stan- named Officer of the Order of Canada in 2006 and has (2007); You Are the Earth (2000); and a number of chil- dard: Certification, Governance and the Forest Steward- received numerous honourary degrees from Canadian dren’s books. Writes regular columns in a variety of ven- ship Council (2008); cleanair.ca: a citizen’s action guide universities. In 2006 and 2007, she was nominated for ues discussing science, the environment, and nature. (2000); and The Wealth of Forests: Markets, Regulation the Nobel Peace Prize and awarded the Rachel Carson and Sustainable Forestry (1998). Prize for exceptional achievement in work for environ- Contact: Head Office: #219, 2211 West 4th Ave., Van- mental causes in 2007. In 2010, the Globe and Mail couver, BC, V6K 4S2; Phone: (604) 732-4228; Toll-free: Contact: Faculty of Law, University of Victoria, PO Box called her the Nation Builder of the Decade for the 1-800-453-1533. URL: www.davidsuzuki.org; Facebook: 1700, Stn CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2; Phone: (250) environment. www.facebook.com/DavidSuzukiFoundation; Twitter: 721-8170; Fax: (250) 721-8146; e-mail: [email protected]; twitter.com/DavidSuzukiFDN; Instagram: URL: www.uvic.ca/law Books: The Right to be Cold: One Woman’s Story of www.instagram.com/davidsuzukifdn Protecting Her Culture, the Arctic, and the Whole Planet Laure Waridel (2015). Peter Tabuns Born January 10, 1973, in Chesalles-sur-Oron, Switzer- land. Contact: c/o Speakers’ Spotlight, #302, 179 John St., Born October 3, 1951, in London, ON. Toronto, ON M5T 1X4; Phone: (416) 345-1559; e-mail: Currently: Special Advisor, Trudel Johnston & [email protected]; LinkedIn: Currently: NDP Ontario MPP for the Toronto—Danforth Lespérance. constituency. Tabuns is the Critic for Greater Toronto www.linkedin.com/in/sheila-watt-cloutier-b9894073 Area Issues, the Critic for Environment and Climate Career: Studied social science at Cégep Lionel-Groulx Change, the Critic for Energy, and the Chair of the in Sainte-Thérèse, Québec, in 1990. Earned a bache- Andrew Weaver Standing Committee on Social Policy. lor’s degree in sociology and international development Born in Victoria, BC. studies at McGill University, and a master’s degree in Political Career: He was City Councillor for the environmental studies at the University of Victoria. Currently: MLA for Oak Bay-Gordon Head since 2013. Riverdale portion of the Toronto—Danforth constituency Waridel worked as an intern in Burkina Faso, where she Political Career: Weaver became the first Green Party from 1990 to 1997. On being sworn in to the Ontario took an interest in the subject of fair trade, particularly MLA in British Columbia’s history upon his win in the Legislature, he was given responsibility for Environment, regarding coffee. She participated in the Earth Summit 2013 general election. He became the leader of the BC Infrastructure Renewal, Transportation, and the Greater in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, and in 1993 co-founded a Green Party in 2015, and was re-elected in his riding in Toronto Area, among several other portfolios. He served non-profit organization called Action for Solidarity, the 2017 general election. He stepped down as leader in as Deputy Third Party House Leader from 2009-2011. Equality, Environment and Development (ASEED), 2020, and sat as an Independent. Career: In Toronto, Tabuns was President of Citizens for which eventually became Équiterre in 1998. In the early Career: After receiving his Ph.D. in Applied Mathemat- a Safe Environment and helped end garbage incinera- 2010s, she and her family took a sabbatical in Switzer- ics from the University of British Columbia in 1987, tion in the Toronto Portlands. He championed housing land, and she began doctoral studies at the Graduate In- Weaver worked at McGill University, Australia’s Univer- alternatives as Vice Chair of the Co-op Housing Federa- stitute of International and Development Studies in sity of New South Wales and the University of Washing- tion of Toronto. Tabuns was also Chair of the Toronto Geneva. She received her doctorate in anthropology ton, primarily in the area of atmospheric and oceanic Board of Health. He has long campaigned for protection and sociology of development in 2016. From 2015-2017 studies. Prior to his election to the BC legislature, he of the environment. On the national stage, Tabuns she served as the Executive Director of CIRODD. served as Canada Research Chair in climate modelling served as Executive Director of Greenpeace Canada Awards: Knight of the Order of La Pléiade, Assemblée and analysis at the University of Victoria’s School of from 1999 to 2004, during which time he advocated for parlementaire de la Francophonie (2006); Honorary doc- Earth and Ocean Sciences. He was Lead Author in the environmental protections that included the adoption of torate, Université du Québec à Rimouski (2011); Mem- 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th scientific assessments conducted the Kyoto Protocol. Tabuns served as special advisor on ber of the Order of Canada (2012); Insigne du mérite, by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on climate change to Jack Layton, 2004 to 2005. Université de Montréal (2013); Knight of the National Or- Climate Change. Contact: Room 165, Main Legislative Building, Queen’s der of Québec (2016). Awards: Weaver is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Park, Toronto, ON M7A 1A5; Phone: (416) 325-3250; Books: L’envers de l’assiette (1998, 2003); Une cause Canada, Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Fax: (416) 325-3252; e-mail: [email protected]; café (1997); Coffee with Pleasure (2001); Acheter c’est Society, American Association for the Advancement of URL: petertabuns.ca; Facebook: voter (2005). Science and the American Meteorological Society. Other www.facebook.com/peter.tabuns - Contact: Phone: (514) 871-8385; e-mail: [email protected] awards and honours include: the Killam Research Fel lowship; Guggenheim fellowship; Royal Society of Can- Chris Tollefson bec; URL: tjl.quebec/en/laure-waridel; Facebook: www.facebook.com/laure.waridel; Twitter: twit- ada Miroslaw Romanowski Medal; A.G. Huntsman Born in Saskatchewan. ter.com/laure_waridel Award for Excellence in Marine Science; Order of British Currently: Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, University Columbia (2008); and the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee Medal (2013). of Victoria. Co-founder and Executive Director of the Pa- Sheila Watt-Cloutier cific Centre for Environmental Law and Litigation, which Born December 2, 1953, in Kuujjuaq, Nunavik, QC. Books: Keeping our Cool: Canada in a Warming World focuses on training public interest environmental (2008); Generation Us: The Challenge of Global Warm- litigators. Currently: Activist, writer, lecturer and presenter. ing (2011). Career: Educated at the University of Victoria Faculty of Career: Educated at McGill University, with a focus on Contact: URL: www.andrewweavermla.ca; Facebook: Law. Called to the Bar of British Columbia in 1987. human development, education and counseling. www.facebook.com/AndrewWeaverMLA; Twitter: twit- Served as law clerk to Mr. Justice Lambert of the British Watt-Cloutier worked as an Inuktitut translator at ter.com/AJWVictoriaBC Columbia Court of Appeal before practising law in the Ungava Hospital, and played a key role in the review of area of criminal defence and Charter litigation. Professor the educational system in Northern Québec. She was Frank Wolf Tollefson’s research interests include aboriginal rights Corporate Secretary for the Makivik Corporation, an and environmental protection, water pollution and Inuit land claims organization, from 1995-1998, and Past Currently: Filmmaker, adventurer, writer, and environ- coastal zone ecology and management, forest protec- President of the Inuit Circumpoloar Council (ICC), head- mentalist. tion and management, and citizen participation in envi- quartered in Canada and representing Inuit interests in Career: Wolf is known for his documentaries on wilder- ronmental and trade issues. He is a member of several countries. In this capacity, Watt-Cloutier advo- ness expeditions around the world, but especially in the Canada’s National Advisory Committee under the cated for the banning of the manufacture and use of per- Canadian North. His films include Borealis (2008), Mam- NAFTA environmental side agreement and a past mem- sistent organic pollutants (POPs), which include malian (2010), On the Line (2011), Kitturiaq (2013), and ber of the Academic Advisory Committee to the Deputy polychlorinated biphenyls and DDT, and which have had The Hand of Franklin (2015), all of which were broad- Minister of International Trade (2002-2004). Tollefson is a profound effect on the Arctic ecology and the families cast on the CBC. He is also a feature writer and colum- also a Past Chair and President, 1997-2001, of who rely on Arctic species for food. From 2002 to 2006, nist for Explore Magazine, and has written features for
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-7 Canadian Environmentalists
Westjet Magazine, Canoeroots Magazine, Reader’s Di- gest, and Adventure Kayak Magazine, among others. He is a public speaker, having given talks at TEDx, FEAT, and other events. Awards: Named one of ‘Canada’s Top Ten Adventurers’ by Explore Magazine in 2012, and ‘One of Canada’s Top 100 Explorers’ by the Royal Canadian Geographical So- ciety in 2015. His documentaries have won numerous film festival awards. Contact: e-mail: [email protected]; URL: www.fwolf.ca; Instagram: www.instagram.com/frankwolf70
E-8 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environmental Abbreviations 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Indicating academic degrees, memberships and honours particular to the sciences, engineer- F.G.S...... —oftheGeological Society (British) ing and other professional standings in environmental pursuits. This list is intended to add defi- F.G.S.A...... —oftheGeological Society of America nition to abbreviations that may not be commonly encountered. For a complete list of F.I.C...... —oftheInstitute of Chemistry abbreviations see the Canadian Almanac and Directory. F.I.C.E...... —oftheInstitution of Civil Engineers A.C...... “Advanced Certification” Canadian Association of Medical F.M.S.A...... —oftheMineralogical Society of America Radiation Technologists F.R.A.I...... —oftheRoyal Anthropological Institute A.C.I.C...... Associate of the Chemical Institute of Canada F.R.A.I.C...... —oftheRoyal Architectural Institute of Canada A.C.S.M...... —ofCambourne School of Mines F.R.G.S...... —oftheRoyal Geographical Society A.F.R.A.S...... Fellow of the Royal Aeronautical Society F.R.Hort.S...... —oftheRoyal Horticultural Society A.L.S...... Commissioned Alberta Land Surveyor F.R.I.B.A...... —oftheRoyal Institute of British Architects A.M.E.I.C...... Associate Member of the Engineering Institute of Canada F.R.I.C...... —oftheRoyal Institute of Chemistry A.M.I.C.E...... —Member of the Institution of Civil Engineers (British) F.R.I.C.S...... —oftheRoyal Institution of Chartered Surveyors A.M.I.E.E...... —oftheInstitute of Electrical Engineers F.R.M.S. (F.R.Met.S.) — of the Royal Meteorological Society A.M.I.Mech.E...... —oftheInstitution of Mechanical Engineers (British) F.R.S.P.H...... —oftheRoyal Society for Public Health A.R.I.C...... —oftheRoyal Institute of Chemistry F.Z.S...... —oftheZoological Society of London (British) A.R.S.M...... —oftheRoyal School of Mines L.S...... Land Surveyor A.Sc.T...... Applied Science Technologist L.S.A...... Licentiate in Agricultural Science Assoc. Inst. M.M.....Associate of the Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (British) M.A.I.E.E...... Member of American Institute of Electrical Engineers B.A.S. (B.A.Sc.).....Bachelor of Applied Science M.A.I.M.E...... —ofAmerican Institute of Mining Engineers B.C.E...... —ofCivil Engineering M.A.P...... Maîtrise en administration publique B.E. (B.Eng.) ...... —ofEngineering M.Arch...... Master of Architecture B.E.D.S...... —ofEnvironmental Design Studies M.A.Sc. (M.A.S.) ....—ofApplied Science B.E.S...... —ofEnvironmental Sciences/Studies M.A.S.C.E...... Member of the American Society of Civil Engineers B.ès.Sc...... Bachelier ès Science M.A.S.M.E...... —oftheAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers B.ès.Sc.App...... —èsScience Appliquée M.C.E...... —ofCivil Engineering B.L.A...... Bachelor of Landscape Architecture M.Ch.E...... —ofChemical Engineering (American) B.S.A...... —ofScience in Agriculture M.C.I.C...... —oftheChemical Institute of Canada B.Sc...... —ofScience M.C.I.F...... —oftheCanadian Institute of Forestry B.S.C.E...... —ofScience in Civil Engineering M.C.I.M...... —oftheCanadian Institute of Mining B.Sc.F (B.S.F.) .....—ofScience in Forestry M.C.I.M.M.P...... —oftheCanadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum B.Sc.F.E...... —ofScience in Forestry Engineering M.E.D.S...... —Master of Environmental Design Studies C.C...... Chartered Cartographer M.E.E...... —ofElectrical Engineering (American) C.C.E.P...... Canadian Certified Environmental Practitioner M.E.I.C...... Member of the Engineering Institute of Canada C.E.A...... Certified Environmental Auditor M.Eng...... Master of Engineering C.H.E...... Certified Health Executive M.E.S...... —ofEnvironmental Sciences/Studies Chem. Ing...... Ingénieur Chimiste Diplomé (Swiss Fed. Inst. Technology) M.F...... —ofForestry C.I.F...... Canadian Institute of Forestry M.I.C.E...... Member of the Institution of Civil Engineers (British) C.I.M...... Certified Industrial Manager M.I.E.E...... —oftheInstitution of Electrical Engineers (British) C.L.S...... Canada Land Surveyor M.I.M.M...... —oftheInstitute of Mining and Metallurgy (British) C.M.M...... Certified Municipal Manager (Ontario) M.Pl...... Master of Planning C.M.O.S...... Canadian Meteorological & Oceanographic Society Consultant M.P.M...... —ofPest Management C.P.P.O...... Certified Public Purchasing Officer M.R.A.I.C...... Member of the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada C.P.P...... —Professional Purchaser M.R.M...... Master of Resource Management C.R.S.P...... Canadian Registered Safety Professional M.R.S.P.H...... Member of the Royal Society of Health D.A...... Doctor of Archaeology (Laval) M.S.A...... Master of Science in Agriculture D.Arch...... —ofArchitecture M.Sc...... —ofScience D.A.Sc...... —inApplied Sciences M.Sc.A...... —ofApplied Science D.Ch.E...... —ofChemical Engineering (American) M.S.C.E...... —ofScience in Civil Engineering D.Eng...... —ofEngineering M.Sc.F...... —ofScience in Forestry D. ès Sc. App...... Docteur ès science appliquée M.U.P...... —ofUrban Planning D.F...... Doctor of Forestry (American) M.U.R.P...... —ofUrban and Rural Planning Dip. Bact...... —inBacteriology M.V...... Médécin Vétérinaire D.L.S...... Dominion Land Surveyor M.V.Sc...... Master of Veterinary Science D.S.A. (D.Sc.A.) ....Docteur ès science appliqués N.D.A...... National Diploma in Agriculture (Royal Ag. Soc. of England) D.Sc...... Doctor of Science O.L.S...... Ontario Land Surveyor D.Sc.Nat...... —inNatural Science P.E...... Professional Engineer E.E...... Electrical Engineer P.Eng...... Registered Professional Engineer E.M...... Mining Engineer P.P...... Professional Purchaser F.A.G.S...... Fellow of the American Geographical Society P.P.B...... Public Buyer F.A.O.U...... —oftheAmerican Ornithologists Union P.T.I.C...... Patent & Trademark Institute of Canada F.A.P.H.A...... —oftheAmerican Public Health Association Q.L.S...... Québec Land Surveyor F.C.I.C...... —oftheChemical Institute of Canada R.P.Bio...... Registered Professional Biologist F.C.M.R.T...... —oftheCanadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists R.P.F...... —Professional Forester F.E...... Forest Engineer Sc.D...... Doctorat ès Sciences F.E.I.C...... Fellow of the Engineering Institute of Canada Sc.L...... Licence ès Sciences F.F.R...... —oftheFaculty of Radiologists (British)
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-9 Environmental Abbreviations
Geographical Terms Street Addresses Provinces Avenue ...... Ave./av Boulevard ...... Blvd./boul. Alberta...... AB...... Alberta Building ...... Bldg./Édifice British Columbia ...... BC...... Colombie-Britannique Care of/au soins de...... c/oa/s Manitoba ...... MB...... Manitoba Court ...... Ct. New Brunswick ...... NB...... Nouveau-Brunswick Crescent ...... Cres. Newfoundland (& Labrador) .....NL...... Terre-Neuve (et Labrador) Drive/Promenade ...... Dr./promenade Northwest Territories...... NT...... Territoires du Nord-Ouest Floor/Étage ...... Fl./étage Nova Scotia...... NS...... Nouvelle-Écosse Highway/Route ...... Hwy./Rte. Nunavut...... NU...... Nunavut Parkway ...... Pkwy. Ontario ...... ON...... Ontario Place/Place ...... Pl. Prince Edward Island ...... PE...... Île-du-Prince-Édouard Post Office Bag ...... POBag Québec ...... PQ...... Québec Post Office Box/Case postal .....POBox/CP Saskatchewan...... SK...... Saskatchewan Postal Sub-Station ...... Postal Sub-Stn./sous-station Yukon ...... YT...... Yukon Road/Chemin ...... Rd./ch Retail Postal Outlet ...... RPO The United States Rural Route/Route rurale ...... RR Alabama ...... AL Square/Carré ...... Sq./carré Alaska ...... AK Station/Succursale ...... Stn/Succ Arizona ...... AZ Suburban Service/Service ...... SS/suburbain Arkansas ...... AR Street/Rue...... St./rue California...... CA Colorado ...... CO Days of the Week Connecticut ...... CT Sunday ...... D...... dimanche Delaware...... DE Monday ...... M...... lundi District of Columbia...... DC Tuesday ...... T...... mardi Florida ...... FL Wednesday ...... W...... mercredi Georgia ...... GA Thursday ...... R...... jeudi Hawaii ...... HI Friday ...... F...... vendredi Idaho ...... ID Saturday ...... S...... samedi Illinois ...... IL Indiana ...... IN Months of the Year Iowa...... IA January/janvier ...... Jan./jan. Kansas ...... KA February/février...... Feb./fév. Kentucky ...... KY March/mars ...... March/mars Louisiana...... LA April/avril ...... April/avril Maine ...... ME May/mai...... May/mai Maryland ...... MD June/juin ...... June/juin Massachusetts ...... MA July/juillet...... July/juillet Michigan ...... MI August/août...... Aug./août Minnesota ...... MN September/septembre ...... Sept./sept. Mississippi...... MS October/octobre ...... Oct./oct. Missouri...... MO November/novembre ...... Nov./nov. Montana ...... MT December/décembre ...... Dec./déc. Nebraska...... NE Nevada ...... NV Publications/Frequency New Hampshire ...... NH New Jersey ...... NJ weekly/w ...... hebdomadaire New Mexico ...... NM every two weeks/bi-weekly ...... quinzomadaire NewYork...... NY twice a month/s-m...... bimensuel North Carolina...... NC monthly/m...... mensuel North Dakota...... ND every two months ...... bimestriel Ohio...... OH quarterly/q...... trimestriel Oklahoma ...... OK twice a year/s-a...... semestriel Oregon ...... OR annual/a...... annuel Pennsylvania...... PA # per annum/# pa ...... #fois par an Rhode Island...... RI every two years/biennial ...... tous les deux ans South Carolina ...... SC every four years/quadrennial ....tous les quatre ans South Dakota ...... SD irregular/irreg...... irrég. Tennessee...... TN Translations Texas...... TX Utah...... UT Selected titles, tags, phrases Vermont...... VT Acronym ...... Acronyme Virginia ...... VA Activities, Task Forces, ...... Activités, groupes de travail, programmes, services Washington ...... WA Programs, Services West Virginia...... WV Administrator...... Administrateur(trice) Wisconsin ...... WI Affiliation(s) ...... Affiliation(s) Wyoming ...... WY Also known as...... Également appelé Amount ...... Montant
E-10 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environmental Abbreviations
Annual Operating Budget ...... Budget de fonctionnement annuel Library (Permission Required) . . . Avec permission seulement Attendees ...... Participants Licensing Body ...... Organisme de réglementation professionnelle Author ...... Auteur(e) Mailing Lists ...... Listes de diffusion 2020 Up-Date Environmental Awards ...... Attribution de prix Manager ...... Administrateur(trice) ou Gérant(e) Awareness Events ...... Événements de sensibilisation Meetings ...... Réunions Business Agent ...... Agent d'affaires Member of...... Membre de Chief Officers ...... Membres du bureau directeur Membership ...... Nombre de membres Commissioner ...... Commissaire Membership criteria ...... Critères d'admissibilité Committees...... Comités Membership fee ...... Montant de la cotisation Communications Officer ...... Agent de communications Merged from ...... Fusion de Conferences ...... Conférences National President...... Président(e) national(e) Contact/Library ...... Responsable/Bibliothèque National Secretary ...... Secrétaire national(e) Contact Person ...... Personne ressource National Treasurer ...... Trésorier(ière) national(e) Contact/Speakers ...... Responsable/Conférenciers Number of Pages ...... Nombre de pages Contents (Publications)...... Contenu(Publications) Organizational Profile ...... Description Conventions ...... Congrès Past President...... Président(e) sortant(e) Coordinator ...... Coordonnateur(trice) Predecessor name ...... Nomduprédécesseur Corresponding Secretary ...... Secrétaire correspondancier President...... Président(e) Crisis-Line ...... Ligne secours President-elect ...... Président(e) désigné(e) Deputy Secretary ...... Secrétaire adjoint(e) Publications...... Publications Editor...... Rédacteur(trice) Recording Secretary ...... Secrétaire archiviste Eligibility ...... Éligibilité Registrar ...... Secrétaire E-Mail ...... Courriel Representative ...... Représentant(e), Délégué(e) EPT...... Employé(e) plein temps Schedule ...... Tableau des cotisations Executive Assistant...... Adjoint(e) de direction Scholarships ...... Bourses Executive Director...... Directeur(trice) général(e) Scope of Activity ...... Envergure des opérations Executive Manager ...... Directeur(trice) Secretary...... Secrétaire Executive Secretary-Treasurer . . . Secrétaire-trésorier(ière) exécutif(ive) Secretary General...... Secrétaire général(e) FAX (Facsmile Transmission)....Télécopieur Secretary-Treasurer ...... Secrétaire-trésorier(ière) Financial Secretary ...... Secrétaire financier(ière) See...... Voir Founding Date ...... Date de fondation Source of Funding...... Fonds General Director ...... Directeur(trice) général(e) Speakers Service ...... Service de conférenciers General Organizer ...... Organisateur(trice) général(e) Sponsors...... Commanditaires Grants ...... Subventions Staff...... Personnel Info-Line ...... Infoligne Toll-free(telephone number) .....Ligne sans frais Interns ...... Stagiaires Translated Name...... Nomtraduit ISBN ...... Numéro ISBN Treasurer...... Trésorier(ière) ISSN ...... Numéro ISSN TTY (Text Telephone) ...... ATS Librarian ...... Bibliothécaire Volunteers ...... Bénévoles Library Hours ...... Heures d'ouverture de la bibliothèque
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-11
Recent Environmental Events niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental 2018 February June • Many regions of Canada experience an abnormally cold and wintery February, with B.C. reaching 9 C below normal, • The Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act comes into effect Calgary enduring its coldest February in 83 years, Toronto on June 21, 2018. The law establishes a set of minimum already surpassing its average annual snowfall, and Atlantic national standards for greenhouse gas pricing in Canada, in Canada logging its coldest February in 25 years. order meet emission reduction targets under the Paris Agreement. March July • Inspired by the efforts of Swedish teenage environmental activist Greta Thunberg, momentum grows among students • A heat wave grips the province of Quebec during the week in Canada and abroad to skip class to protest a lack of of July 1-8, resulting in the deaths of more than 90 people, environmental protection, including a march on Parliament with more than 50 of them in Montreal alone. Hill. August April
• In Alberta, the cities of Calgary, Edmonton, Red Deer and • Environment and Climate Change Canada releases a report Grande Prairie log their smokiest summers on record due to noting that Canada is warming twice as fast as the rest of forest fires, according to Environment and Climate Change the world, and that drastic change is the only way to prevent Canada. Most old records were set in 2017, with the a catastrophic future. Much of the blame for the warming felt exception of Grande Prairie, which set its old record in 1994. not only in Canada, but around the world, is placed on burning fossil fuels. September May • Six tornadoes hit the Ottawa-Gatineau region on September 21, 2018, causing widespread damage and power outages. • The Ottawa River swells on May 1, 2019, due to a mix of unthawed ground and snow, and heavy rains. Two people October die in the flooding, which displaces 6,000 residents in • Prime Minister Trudeau announces a revenue-neutral Ottawa and Gatineau, hundreds more in surrounding carbon tax starting in 2019, under the Greenhouse Gas communities, and also floods farmland. Pollution Pricing Act, called the Output-Based Pricing June System (OBPS). Pricing starts at $20 per ton in 2019, rising at $10 per ton per year until reaching $50 per ton in 2022. • Prime Minister Trudeau announces a plan to ban harmful The pricing takes effect in January 2019. single-use plastics as early as 2021, and to make companies that manufacture plastic products or sell items November with plastic packaging responsible for their own plastic waste. • At the annual meeting of the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, the federal, provincial, and territorial July environment ministers agree on a Canada-wide zero-plastic-waste strategy that aims to reduce plastic waste • The Government of Canada announces a renewal of the by 30 per cent per person by 2030, and by 50 per cent by Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan for another 15 2040. years (2020–2034), and an investment of $1.16 billion from 2020–2024. This is meant to allow the government to December remediate an estimated 1,316 contaminated sites, including 475 sites on First Nation reserves. • Environment and Climate Change Canada releases its list of the top 10 weather-related stories of 2018, with forest fires in August B.C. taking the number one spot. The province declared a • After comments made by People’s Party Leader Maxime state of emergency from August to September, with 2,115 Bernier, in which he cast doubts about the legitimacy of fires and 1.35 million hectares burned. climate change, Elections Canada issues a warning to environmental charities that any discussion of the dangers of 2019 climate change during the upcoming federal election campaign could be considered partisan. That means if a January charity engages in activities such as advertising or surveys • Syncrude Canada pleads guilty to contravening the highlighting the risks of climate change, they could be forced Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994, after exposing great to register as a third party in the election and risk losing blue herons to bitumen in an abandoned sump at their charitable tax status. Advocacy groups decry the move as Mildred Lake facility in Alberta, leading to the death of 31 stifling the conversation around climate change. birds. The company is fined $1.775 million, plus another $975,000 under the provincial Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-13 Recent Environmental Events
September such as drinking straws and plastic cutlery. The report finds that less than 10 per cent of plastic products used in Canada • After causing immense damage in the Bahamas with 300 are recycled, meaning that 3.3 million tonnes of plastic ends km/h winds, Hurricane Dorian moves its way up to Nova up in the trash. Scotia, becoming a post-tropical storm with winds of 155 km/h. By the time it leaves Atlantic Canada, half a million • The first case of COVID-19 in Canada is reported by Health people are without power, and $140 million in damage to Canada on Jan. 25, 2020: a Toronto man who had recently insured property is recorded. travelled to Wuhan, China.
• Continuing the momentum gained earlier in the year, February hundreds of thousands of Canadians march for climate • Researchers from the University of Ottawa release a paper action across the country, demanding that officials adopt a linking the declining bumblebee population in North America climate action plan of zero carbon emissions by 2050. and Europe to “climate chaos,” and warn that the decline could continue on a mass-extinction level if something isn’t October done to support bee habitats and to reverse the effects of • Twenty municipalities across Quebec, including in Montreal, climate change as a whole. delay Halloween to prevent families from trick-or-treating in March heavy rains, snow and strong winds. • The World Health Organization declares the COVID-19 • rd The 43 general election is held on October 21, 2019, with outbreak a global pandemic on March 11. By mid-month, Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government remaining in power, much of Canada is entering lockdown in order to contain the albeit with a minority government. Elizabeth May and the spread of the virus – a lockdown that will last in varying Green Party have their best showing ever with three seats, forms for months to come. On March 24, Health Canada up one from before the election. confirms that local transmission has become the primary cause of COVID-19 spread in Canada. November April • In the journal BioScience, 11,000 scientists from 153 countries sign a declaration of climate emergency, saying • The Government of Ontario suspends environmental the efforts of governments around the world are failing. They oversight rules under its COVID-19 state of emergency outline six factors governments and policy-makers should order, including a section of the Environmental Bill of Rights. take into account in order to reduce the effects of climate Critics worry that it is an overreach designed to avoid change: energy; short-lived pollutants; nature; food; the environmental checks and balances on major projects, while economy; and population. the province says that it will only be used for projects related to the pandemic. The Environmental Protection Agency in December the United States made a similar move in March. • In its annual list of top 10 weather-related stories, May Environment and Climate Change Canada reveals that 2019 was a record warm year in the Arctic. Sea ice reached its • Environment and Climate Change Canada reports that most second-lowest minimum on record, temperatures reached major cities in Canada have seen a stark improvement in air 14 C warmer than average, and anomalous events are quality over the past two months, due to COVID-19 lockdown efforts keeping people home instead of on the logged, such as a tornado near Fort Smith, N.W.T., and roads, and factories either closed or operating at reduced lightning strikes within 500 km of the North Pole. capacity. 2020 June January • A severe hailstorm strikes Calgary on June 13, causing almost $1.2 billion in damage – making it the • Environment and Climate Change Canada releases a report fourth-most-expensive natural disaster in Canadian history. backing the government’s initiative to ban single-use plastics
E-14 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environmental Performance Index 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Environmental Performance Index 2020
Global metrics for the environment: Ranking country performance on sustainability issues
epi rankings 1–36 37–72 73–108 109–144 145–180 na
Yale Center for Center for International With support from This Summary for Policymakers contains a snapshot of the Environmental Law Earth Science The McCall MacBain Foundation 2020 EPI’s framework and results. Complete methods, & Policy, Information Network, and special assistance from data, and results—including breakout scores and rankings for Yale University Columbia University The Mullion Group individual countries—are available online at epi.yale.edu.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-15 Environmental Performance Index
Executive Summary
The 2020 Environmental Performance In- epi score dex (EPI) provides a data-driven summary of the state of sustainability around the world. Using 32 performance indicators across 11 issue categories, the EPI ranks 180 countries on environmental health and ecosystem vitality. These indicators provide a gauge at a national scale of how close countries are to established envi- ronmental policy targets. The EPI offers a scorecard that highlights leaders and lag- gards in environmental performance and provides practical guidance for countries that aspire to move toward a sustainable future. The metrics on which the 2020 rankings are based come from a variety of sources and represent the most recent published data, often from 2017 or 2018. Thus the analysis does not reflect recent developments, including the dramatic drop in air pollution in 2020 in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic or the green- house gas emissions from the extensive Amazonian fires in 2019. These indicators provide a way to spot problems, set targets, track trends, understand outcomes, and identify best gdp per capita [2011 us $, thousands] (logged) policy practices. Good data and fact- The relationship between 2020 EPI Score and GDP per capita shows a strong positive correlation, although based analysis can also help government many countries out- or underperform their economic peers. officials refine their policy agendas, facili- tate communications with key stakehold- outcomes. This trend is especially true relationships with top-tier EPI scores. ers, and maximize the return on envi- for issue categories under the umbrella Third, while top EPI performers pay ronmental investments. The EPI offers a of environmental health, as building the attention to all areas of sustainability, powerful policy tool in support of efforts necessary infrastructure to provide clean their lagging peers tend to have uneven to meet the targets of the UN Sustainable drinking water and sanitation, reduce performance. Denmark, which ranks #1, Development Goals and to move society ambient air pollution, control hazardous has strong results across most issues toward a sustainable future. waste, and respond to public health crises and with leading-edge commitments and Overall EPI rankings indicate which yields large returns for human well-being. outcomes with regard to climate change countries are best addressing the envi- Second, the pursuit of economic mitigation. In general, high scorers exhibit ronmental challenges that every nation prosperity – manifested in industrializa- long-standing policies and programs to faces. Going beyond the aggregate scores tion and urbanization – often means more protect public health, preserve natural and drilling down into the data to analyze pollution and other strains on ecosystem resources, and decrease greenhouse gas performance by issue category, policy vitality, especially in the developing world, emissions. The data further suggest that objective, peer group, and country offers where air and water emissions remain countries making concerted efforts to even greater value for policymakers. This significant. But at the same time, the decarbonize their electricity sectors have granular view and comparative perspec- data suggest countries need not sacrifice made the greatest gains in combating cli- tive can assist in understanding the deter- sustainability for economic security or mate change, with associated benefits for minants of environmental progress and in vice versa. In every issue category, we find ecosystems and human health. We note, refining policy choices. countries that rise above their economic however, that every country – including peers. Policymakers and other stakehold- those at the top of the EPI rankings – still explaining performance ers in these leading countries demon- has issues to improve upon. No country A number of striking conclusions emerge strate that focused attention can mobilize can claim to be on a fully sustainable from the 2020 EPI rankings and indicators. communities to protect natural resources trajectory. First, good policy results are associated and human well-being despite the strains Fourth, laggards must redouble with wealth (GDP per capita), mean- associated with economic growth. In this national sustainability efforts along all ing that economic prosperity makes it regard, indicators of good governance fronts. A number of important countries possible for nations to invest in policies – including commitment to the rule of in the Global South, including India and and programs that lead to desirable law, a vibrant press, and even-handed Nigeria, come out near the bottom of the enforcement of regulations – have strong rankings. Their low EPI scores indicate
E-16 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environmental Performance Index niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental
the need for greater attention to the ing, it also reveals a number of severe global pandemic spectrum of sustainability requirements, data gaps that limit the analytic scope The 2020 EPI emerges in the midst of with a high-priority focus on critical issues of the rankings. As the EPI project has the COVID-19 crisis that has challenged such as air and water quality, biodiversity, highlighted for two decades, better data public health systems and disrupted and climate change. Some of the other collection, reporting, and verification economic activity across the world. The laggards, including Nepal and Afghani- across a range of environmental issues global pandemic has made clear the pro- stan, face broader challenges such as civil are urgently needed. The existing gaps found interdependence of all nations and unrest, and their low scores can almost all are especially pronounced in the areas of the importance of investing in resilience. be attributed to weak governance. agriculture, water resources, and threats Unintended consequences of the eco- to biodiversity. New investments in stron- nomic shutdown in many nations include refining metrics ger global data systems are essential to a sharp drop in pollution levels and the Innovations in the 2020 EPI data and better manage sustainability challenges return of wildlife. The EPI team hopes methodology reflect the latest advances and to ensure that the global community that this unexpected glimpse of what a in environmental science and indicator does not breach fundamental planetary sustainable planet might look like from analysis. Notably, the 2020 rankings boundaries. an ecological perspective – albeit at a include for the first time a waste manage- The inability to capture transbound- terrible price in terms of public health and ment metric and a pilot indicator on CO2 ary environmental impacts persists as a economic damage – will inspire the policy emissions from land cover change. Other limitation of the current EPI framework. transformation required for a sustainable new indicators deepen the analysis of air While the current methodology reveals future that is both economically vigorous quality, biodiversity & habitat, fisheries, important insights into how countries and environmentally sound. ecosystem services, and climate change. perform within their own borders, it Full documentation of the methodology does not account for “exported” impacts creating a composite index is available online at epi.yale.edu, and the associated with imported products. With As a composite index, the Environmental EPI team invites feedback and sugges- groundbreaking models and new datasets Performance Index distills data on many tions for strengthening future versions of emerging, the EPI team has been working indicators of sustainability into a single the Index. to produce new metrics that account for number. Advances in scientific investiga- While the EPI provides a framework the spillovers of harm associated with tion, sensing methods, and data reporting for greater analytic rigor in policymak- traded goods in an interconnected world. mean the world’s access to data on the state of the environment has never been richer. With every iteration of the EPI, we seek the best available data to produce useful and credible scores that address urgent questions. For the 2020 EPI, we’ve assembled 32 indicators of environmental perfor- mance for 180 countries. The data come from trusted third-party sources like international governing bodies, nongov- ernmental organizations, and academic research centers. Credible datasets rely on established collection methods that have been peer-reviewed by the scientific community or endorsed by international authorities. To give our metrics meaning to a broad audience, we take the data we re- ceive and construct indicators on a 0–100 scale, from worst to best performance. For each country, we then weigh and aggregate the scores for indicators into issue categories, policy objectives, and then, finally, into an EPI score. Scores for all countries can be viewed or download- ed at our website, epi.yale.edu.
The 2020 EPI Framework. The framework organizes 32 indicators into 11 issue categories and two policy objectives, with weights shown at each level as a percentage of the total score.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-17 Environmental Performance Index
RANKRANK COUNTRY SCORESCORE REG REG RANKRANK COUNTRY COUNTRY SCORE REG REG RANKRANK COUNTRY COUNTRY SCORE REG REG
1 Denmark 82.5 1 61 Uruguay 49.1 9 120 Samoa 37.3 12 2 Luxembourg 82.3 2 62 Albania 49.0 16 122 Qatar 37.1 15 3 Switzerland 81.5 3 63 Antigua and Barbuda 48.5 10 123 Zimbabwe 37.0 11 4 United Kingdom 81.3 4 64 Cuba 48.4 11 124 Central African Republic 36.9 12 5 France 80.0 5 St. Vincent and Grenadines 48.4 11 125 Dem. Rep. Congo 36.4 13 6 Austria 79.6 6 66 Jamaica 48.2 13 126 Guyana 35.9 30 7 Finland 78.9 7 67 Iran 48.0 6 127 Maldives 35.6 3 8 Sweden 78.7 8 68 Malaysia 47.9 6 Uganda 35.6 14 9 Norway 77.7 9 69 Trinidad and Tobago 47.5 14 129 Timor-Leste 35.3 14 10 Germany 77.2 10 70 Panama 47.3 15 130 Laos 34.8 15 11 Netherlands 75.3 11 71 Tunisia 46.7 7 Sudan 34.8 16 12 Japan 75.1 1 72 Azerbaijan 46.5 5 132 Kenya 34.7 15 13 Australia 74.9 12 73 Paraguay 46.4 16 Zambia 34.7 15 14 Spain 74.3 13 74 Dominican Republic 46.3 17 134 Ethiopia 34.4 17 15 Belgium 73.3 14 Montenegro 46.3 17 Fiji 34.4 16 16 Ireland 72.8 15 76 Gabon 45.8 2 136 Mozambique 33.9 18 17 Iceland 72.3 16 77 Barbados 45.6 18 137 Eswatini 33.8 19 18 Slovenia 72.0 1 78 Bosnia and Herzegovina 45.4 18 Rwanda 33.8 19 19 New Zealand 71.3 17 Lebanon 45.4 8 139 Cambodia 33.6 17 20 Canada 71.0 18 Thailand 45.4 7 Cameroon 33.6 21 Czech Republic 71.0 2 81 Suriname 45.2 19 141 Viet Nam 33.4 18 Italy 71.0 18 82 Mauritius 45.1 3 142 Pakistan 33.1 4 23 Malta 70.7 20 Tonga 45.1 8 143 Micronesia 33.0 19 24 United States of America 69.3 21 84 Algeria 44.8 9 144 Cabo Verde 32.8 22 25 Greece 69.1 3 85 Kazakhstan 44.7 6 145 Nepal 32.7 5 26 Slovakia 68.3 4 86 Dominica 44.6 20 146 Papua New Guinea 32.4 20 27 Portugal 67.0 22 87 Moldova 44.4 7 147 Mongolia 32.2 21 28 South Korea 66.5 2 88 Bolivia 44.3 21 148 Comoros 32.1 23 29 Israel 65.8 1 Uzbekistan 44.3 8 149 Guatemala 31.8 31 30 Estonia 65.3 5 90 Peru 44.0 22 150 Tanzania 31.1 24 31 Cyprus 64.8 6 Saudi Arabia 44.0 10 151 Nigeria 31.0 25 32 Romania 64.7 7 92 Turkmenistan 43.9 9 152 Marshall Islands 30.8 22 33 Hungary 63.7 8 93 Bahamas 43.5 23 Niger 30.8 26 34 Croatia 63.1 9 94 Egypt 43.3 11 Republic of Congo 30.8 26 35 Lithuania 62.9 10 95 El Salvador 43.1 24 155 Senegal 30.7 28 36 Latvia 61.6 11 Grenada 43.1 24 156 Eritrea 30.4 29 37 Poland 60.9 12 Saint Lucia 43.1 24 157 Benin 30.0 30 38 Seychelles 58.2 1 South Africa 43.1 4 158 Angola 29.7 31 39 Singapore 58.1 3 99 Turkey 42.6 19 159 Togo 29.5 32 40 Taiwan 57.2 4 100 Morocco 42.3 12 160 Mali 29.4 33 41 Bulgaria 57.0 13 101 Belize 41.9 27 161 Guinea-Bissau 29.1 34 42 United Arab Emirates 55.6 2 102 Georgia 41.3 10 162 Bangladesh 29.0 6 43 North Macedonia 55.4 14 103 Botswana 40.4 5 163 Vanuatu 28.9 23 44 Chile 55.3 1 104 Namibia 40.2 6 164 Djibouti 28.1 35 45 Serbia 55.2 15 105 Kyrgyzstan 39.8 11 165 Lesotho 28.0 36 46 Brunei Darussalam 54.8 5 106 Iraq 39.5 13 166 Gambia 27.9 37 47 Kuwait 53.6 3 107 Bhutan 39.3 1 167 Mauritania 27.7 38 48 Jordan 53.4 4 108 Nicaragua 39.2 28 168 Ghana 27.6 39 49 Belarus 53.0 1 109 Sri Lanka 39.0 2 India 27.6 7 50 Colombia 52.9 2 110 Oman 38.5 14 170 Burundi 27.0 40 51 Mexico 52.6 3 111 Philippines 38.4 9 Haiti 27.0 32 52 Costa Rica 52.5 4 112 Burkina Faso 38.3 7 172 Chad 26.7 41 53 Armenia 52.3 2 Malawi 38.3 7 Solomon Islands 26.7 24 54 Argentina 52.2 5 114 Tajikistan 38.2 12 174 Madagascar 26.5 42 55 Brazil 51.2 6 115 Equatorial Guinea 38.1 9 175 Guinea 26.4 43 56 Bahrain 51.0 5 116 Honduras 37.8 29 176 Côte d'Ivoire 25.8 44 Ecuador 51.0 7 Indonesia 37.8 10 177 Sierra Leone 25.7 45 58 Russia 50.5 3 118 Kiribati 37.7 11 178 Afghanistan 25.5 8 59 Venezuela 50.3 8 119 São Tomé and Príncipe 37.6 10 179 Myanmar 25.1 25 60 Ukraine 49.5 4 120 China 37.3 12 180 Liberia 22.6 46
Asia-Pacific Former Soviet States Greater Middle East Southern Asia Eastern Europe Global West Latin America & Caribbean Sub-Saharan Africa
Rank, EPI Score, and Regional Standing (REG, shown in color) Wendling, Z.A., Emerson, J.W., de Sherbinin, A., Esty, D.C., et al. (2020). for 180 countries. 2020 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for FSC logo Environmental Law & Policy. epi.yale.edu © 2020 Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy
Wendling, Z. A., Emerson, J. W., de Sherbinin, A., Esty, D. C., et al. (2020). 2020 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environ- mental Law & Policy. epi.yale.edu. Readers may also be interested in The Urban Environment and Social Inclusion Index (UESI) available at https://datadrivenlab.org/urban.
E-18 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Plans at a glance Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) is the lead federal department for strategic action on a wide range of environmental matters, including action on clean growth and climate change, preventing and managing pollution, conserving nature, and predicting weather and environmental conditions. The Department’s program focus reflects the interdependence of environmental sustainability and economic well-being. ECCC works in partnership with provincial, territorial and municipal governments and Indigenous partners, communities and governments and aligns with the Government of Canada’s approach of openness, effectiveness and transparency in government.
Taking Action on Clean Growth and Climate Change
In 2020 and beyond, the Department continues to lead a whole of government plan for climate change, focused on achieving a cleaner environment and a sustainable economy. This entails the implementation of the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change, while strengthening greenhouse gas reducing measures to meet and exceed Canada’s 2030 emissions reduction goal, and lead government-wide efforts to set Canada on a path to achieve a prosperous net-zero emissions future by 2050.
The Department will continue implementation of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, to set a price on carbon pollution that creates incentives for individuals, households and businesses to choose cleaner options, including green technology—with proceeds returned to the jurisdiction of origin.
The Department will also continue the implementation of the Climate Action Incentive Fund, the Low Carbon Economy Fund and the Climate Action Fund to encourage and facilitate action by industry and consumers to take action to reduce emissions and shift to cleaner technologies and practices.
The Department’s will lay the ground work for more ambitious climate actions by setting legally binding, five-year emissions-reduction milestones—based on the advice of experts and consultations with Canadians—and will also work with Innovation, Science and Industry Canada, Transport Canada and Natural Resources Canada to advance zero-emission vehicles targets of 10 per cent of light-duty vehicle sales per year by 2025, 30% by 2030, and 100% by 2040. It will also entail working with Innovation, Science and Industry Canada and Natural Resources Canada to position Canada as a global leader in clean technology.
This will be complemented by actions including a clean fuel standard and regulations, continued implementation of regulations to reduce methane emissions and certain Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) from the oil and gas sector, amendments to coal-fired and natural gas-fired electricity generation regulations, and other regulatory measures to reduce emissions.
Preventing and Managing Pollution
In 2020, ECCC will support its Minister in working with the Minister of Health to better protect people and the environment from toxic substances and other pollution, including working towards strengthening the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999.
Following through on the Government of Canada’s leadership with The Ocean Plastics Charter—launched under Canada’s 2018 G7 Presidency—the Department will implement the plan to ban harmful single-use plastics, and take steps toward eliminating plastic pollution in Canada, as a cornerstone of its Zero Plastic Waste Initiative. ECCC will work with provinces and territories to develop national targets, standards and regulations that will make companies that manufacture plastic products or sell items with plastic packaging responsible for collecting and recycling them.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-19 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan
The Department will also continue to protect the environment and Canadians from harmful substances by delivering Canada’s Chemicals Management Plan with Health Canada. Reducing harmful emissions will continue to be a priority for ECCC in 2020 and beyond, and the Department will continue working with provinces and territories to implement the Air Quality Management System and to pursue measures that improve air quality.
ECCC will develop further protections and take steps to clean up the Great Lakes, Lake Winnipeg and other large lakes and the St. Lawrence River watershed, and will work with Transport Canada and Fisheries and Oceans Canada to implement the Oceans Protection Plan. In collaboration with the Government of Alberta, the Department will monitor oil sands to ensure they are developed in an environmentally and socially responsible manner.
Conserving Nature
Building on the momentum of its recent nature conservation efforts under the $1.3 billion Canada’s Nature Legacy initiative, ECCC will work with the Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Parks Canada Agency to introduce an ambitious new plan to conserve 25% of Canada’s land and 25% of Canada’s oceans by 2025, and work toward 30% of each by 2030. The plan will be grounded in science, Indigenous knowledge and local perspectives, and will be complemented by ECCC’s advocacy at international gatherings that countries around the world also set a 30% conservation goal for 2030.
The Department will promote and support actions to protect and conserve areas of high ecological and biodiversity value, including National Wildlife Areas, Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas, provincial, territorial and municipal parks, and conservation actions by non-government organizations and foundations. ECCC will also continue to implement the Pan-Canadian Approach to Transforming Species at Risk Conservation in Canada, with a focus on multi-species and ecosystem-based approaches, and more targeted planning and action on priority places, species and sectors. Partnerships with Indigenous peoples will feature prominently in this work.
The Department will continue to work to protect biodiversity and species at risk, while engaging with provinces, territories, Indigenous communities, scientists, industry and other stakeholders to evaluate the effectiveness of the existing Species at Risk Act and assess the need for modernization.
Predicting Weather and Environmental Conditions
ECCC will continue to implement its leading-edge approach to weather data management, analysis and innovative information techniques to provide Canadians with accurate and timely information to make health, safety and business decisions. The Canadian Weather Radar Replacement Program will see seven new radars replace outdated technology, as the primary tools used by meteorologists to forecast short- term severe weather events associated with thunderstorms, tornadoes, ice storms and blizzards. ECCC’s National Hydrologic Service will modernize and strengthen its engineering and technical capacity, modernize its water stations and infrastructure, and put in place new technologies to gather and analyze water data.
For more information on Environment and Climate Change Canada’s plans, priorities and planned results, see the “Planned results and resources” section of this report.
E-20 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Core Responsibilities
Planned results and resources, and key risks, for core responsibilities
Core Responsibility: Taking Action on Clean Growth and Climate Change
Description
Through engagement with other federal departments and agencies, provinces, territories, Indigenous peoples, and other stakeholders, and external experts, the Department will support and coordinate the implementation of the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change (PCF); work to reduce Canadian greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; drive clean growth; develop regulatory instruments; support businesses and Canadians to adapt and become more resilient to climate change; and contribute to international climate change actions to increase global benefits.
Planning highlights
Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change
Climate change is the defining issue of our time. ECCC recognizes the seriousness of this issue and will continue to take ambitious action to reduce Canada’s greenhouse gases (GHG) and other harmful emissions.
In 2016, governments, Canadians, and Indigenous peoples came together to inform and develop the country’s first national climate plan. The Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change (PCF) is Canada’s plan to reduce GHGs to 30% below 2005 levels by 2030 and position Canada to be competitive in the clean economy. As a result of the PCF, the 2019 GHG and Air Pollutant Emission Projections Report shows that Canada’s emissions are projected to be 227 million tonnes (Mt) below what was projected in 2015. Canada's Fourth Biennial Report on Climate Changei, submitted to the UNFCCC on December 31, 2019, projects an overall decline in Canada’s GHG emissions over the next 11 years. A wide range of policies, programs and investments implemented under Canada’s climate plan have led to the biggest improvement to Canada’s emissions outlooks relative to pre-PCF projections encompassing all economic sectors, and demonstrating the effectiveness of Canada’s climate plan.
However, science indicates that more action is needed. That is why the Government of Canada has announced its intent to meet and exceed Canada’s 2030 Paris Agreement target and begin work so that Canada can achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. In 2020-21, ECCC will lay the groundwork for more ambitious climate action by continuing to implement the PCF, working with our partners to strengthen existing and identify new greenhouse gas reductions measures, as well as setting legally binding, five-year emissions-reduction milestones based on advice from experts and consultations with Canadians.
In 2020-2021, ECCC will continue its partnership and constructive dialogue with First Nations, Inuit, and the Métis to inform the designs of policies and program to reflect and advance Indigenous peoples’ clean growth and climate change priorities. These partnerships are vital to the successful implementation of the PCF and to the success of future climate change activities.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-21 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan
Expanding Climate Action
The effects of climate change are already being felt across Canada and around the world. The science is clear that more climate action is Integrating science, sharing data required. The IPCC’s Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C (October 2018) called for net-zero emissions by 2050 to avoid the Canada’s climate is changing. Climate information is needed to plan worst consequences of climate change. As a result, building on the for change and to reduce risks to ongoing implementation of the PCF, the Government of Canada is Canadians. To ensure the right committed to exceeding Canada’s current 2030 emissions reduction audience has access to the right tools, target and develop a plan to achieving a net-zero emissions the Canadian Centre for Climate economy by 2050. Services (CCCS) will continue to support a suite of climate data portals The Government of Canada recognizes that net-zero means doing including climatedata.ca. Launched things in a different way. Technology and innovation will be a huge in 2019, climatedata.ca is a collaboration between CCCS, climate part of the solution and also lead to new business opportunities for service providers in Canada, and Canadians. Consultations with Canadians will also be critical. leading-edge technology developers. Together, the climate data portals Carbon Pricing share climate information with a wide variety of users, including engineers, A price on carbon pollutionii across Canada that creates incentives public health professionals, urban planners, and others who benefit from for individuals, households, and businesses to choose cleaner options access to climate change information, including green technology with proceeds returned to the jurisdiction data, resources and tools. In 2020-21, of origin. Under the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, the federal efforts will focus on new sectors and carbon pollution pricing system has two parts: a regulatory charge on training material as well as enhancing fossil fuels (the fuel charge); and a performance-based pricing system functionality. for industrial facilities, known as the output-based pricing system (OBPS). The system applies in those provinces and territories that requested it or that did not have their own system that meets the federal benchmark stringency criteria. The OBPS is designed to put a price on carbon pollution from industry while maintaining their competitive position relative to international peers and reducing the risk of carbon leakage. The OBPS enables emissions trading and use of GHG offset credits.
Strengthening the regulatory agenda
The clean fuel standardiii is aimed at reducing emissions from liquid, gaseous, and solid fuels used in transportation, buildings, and industry. The objectives of the clean fuel standard are to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, create an incentive for investment and innovation in low carbon fuels and technology, and reduce compliance costs through a flexible regulatory design. ECCC will publish the proposed regulations for liquid fuels class in 2020, and intends to bring liquid class regulations into force in 2022, followed by regulations for the gaseous and solid classes in 2023.
The Department will continue to implement regulations reducing the release of methane and certain Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) from the upstream oil and gas sector that aim to reduce methane emissions by about 20 Mt by 2025 relative to the estimated 2012 levels of 45 Mt CO2e. ECCC will also implement amendments to coal-fired electricity generation regulations that will reduce GHG emissions by 12.8 Mt in 2030, as well as natural gas-fired electricity generation regulations.
The Department will also implement regulations amending the Heavy-duty Vehicle and Engine GHG Emission Regulations that are projected to reduce GHG emissions by approximately 6 Mt annually, starting in 2030. To help inform options to reduce emissions from light-duty vehicles, ECCC will finalize and publish Canada’s Mid-term Evaluation on standards for model years 2022 to 2025 under the light-duty vehicle GHG regulations.
E-22 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental
The Department will continue to implement Canada’s Strategy on Short-lived Climate Pollutants (SLCPS). SLCPs are a group of potent GHGs and air pollutants including black carbon, methane, hydrofluorocarbons and ground-level ozone, which contribute to climate warming and can affect air quality. In 2020-21, ECCC will publish a progress report on commitments under the SLCP Strategy and continue to advance domestic and international work to reduce SLCP emissions.
In 2020-21, ECCC will release a National Climate Change Science and Knowledge Plan to support the delivery of the PCF. It will support better coordination and strategic investments for all Canadian science and knowledge actors.
ECCC will continue laying the groundwork towards Canada’s zero emission vehicle targets of 10 per cent light-duty vehicle sales by 2025, 30 per cent by 2030 and 100 per cent by 2040. This work will be done in collaboration with Innovation, Science and Industry Canada, Natural Resources Canada and Transport Canada.
Climate Action Incentive Fund
Under the carbon pollution pricing system, approximately 90% of proceeds from the fuel charge in provinces will be returned directly to individuals and households through Climate Action Incentive payments when they file their tax returns. The remainder of the revenues will be devoted to federal programming, including the Climate Action Incentive Fund (CAIF) that will support small- and medium-sized businesses, as well as municipalities, universities, colleges, schools, hospitals, not-for-profit organizations, and Indigenous peoples in advancing energy efficiency and carbon-reduction projects.
Low Carbon Economy Fund
To support actions under the PCF, ECCC will continue to implement the $2 billion Low Carbon Economy Fundiv. The Department will continue to work with provinces and territories under the Leadership Fund to identify further opportunities for partnership to leverage investments in projects that will generate clean growth, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and help meet or exceed Canada’s Paris Agreement commitments. ECCC is investing $500 million under the Challenge to support GHG reduction projects administered by provinces and territories, municipalities, Indigenous communities and organizations, businesses, and not-for-profit organizations. For example, ECCC is providing funding to the University of Calgary to perform energy retrofits allowing for greater energy efficiency and heat recovery that will reduce GHG emissions by 12,750 tonnes CO2e. Further, a project to enable the expansion of Regina’s landfill gas collection system with new infrastructure will allow the increased collection and combustion of methane/landfill gas onsite.
Climate Action Fund
ECCC will continue to implement the $3 million Climate Action Fund, which supports projects delivered by students, youth, Indigenous peoples and organizations, not-for-profit organizations, small- and medium-sized enterprises, and research and educational institutions, that are designed to raise awareness of climate change and clean growth, and encourage others to take action. For example, the Department will support the Saskatchewan Environmental Society’s Saskatchewan Low Carbon Stories project, which will engage local farmers, young people, Indigenous communities, and economic developers across the province and share their low-carbon business solutions in rural Saskatchewan.
International Climate Action
ECCC will continue its leadership role in working with international partners to advance the effective implementation of the Paris Agreement, which Canada ratified in October 2016, towards increasing the global response to climate change. ECCC led Canada’s participation at COP 25 in December 2019 in Madrid, Spain to continue advancing implementation of the Paris Agreement and to promote clean
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-23 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan
growth and the integration of efforts on climate, oceans and nature. Going forward—including in the lead up to COP 26 in November 2020—Canada will continue to engage internationally to advance ambitious and inclusive climate action. This includes by ensuring Indigenous peoples are engaged in developing international climate policy, and by promoting gender equality and the role of women in climate action around the world. Canada will also remain steadfast in its efforts to ensure that international market mechanisms are guided by a robust set of rules and operate with environmental integrity.
ECCC will continue to support developing countries transition to resilient, low-carbon economies, including by working closely with Global Affairs Canada to deliver Canada’s climate finance commitment of $2.65 billion by March 2021. Canada’s climate finance is delivered through various multilateral and bilateral initiatives, including the Green Climate Fund. Funds will target sectors such as clean technology and renewable energy, climate-smart agriculture and forest management, and risk insurance and capacity building, with special consideration for the poorest and most vulnerable developing countries. Canada’s climate finance is consistent with its feminist international assistance policyv to promote gender equality and help empower all women and girls.
Clean growth and climate change in trade agreements
Canada seeks to include ambitious, comprehensive, and enforceable provisions on environment in its free- trade agreements. This includes obligations to maintain robust environmental governance as trade and investment are liberalized, as well as commitments on a range of global environmental issues, including illegal wildlife trade, sustainable fisheries and forestry management, and climate change. These commitments are being implemented as part of agreements with key trading partners, including the United States, Mexico, the European Union and countries party to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.
United Nations’ 2030 Agenda1 and Sustainable Development Goalsvi In defining a whole of government view of federal environmental sustainability commitments and actions, the 2019-2022 Federal Sustainable Development Strategy, developed and coordinated by ECCC, supports Canada’s overall response to the 2030 Agenda. ECCC’s continued implementation of activities in support of its core responsibility for Taking Action on Clean Growth and Climate Change, will directly contribute to the achievement of numerous sustainable development goals. For example, pricing carbon pollution and the associated regulations will comprehensively and directly combat climate change and its impacts by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and stimulating investments in clean innovation (Goal 13vii), while initiatives such as climate action incentives and partnership funding will promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth (Goal 8viii). Supporting resilient infrastructure and innovative and inclusive approaches to industrial development will be achieved through LCEF incentives (Goal 9ix), which will also foster sustainable business and employment opportunities and consumption practices (Goal 1x and Goal 12xi). Taken together, numerous ECCC initiatives to reduce harmful emissions and to track and respond to pollutant releases will help protect human health and the environment.
When considered together, ECCC initiatives represent a comprehensive approach to facilitate Canada’s shift to a low carbon economy, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, achieve clean and sustainable growth, and promote innovation in industrial technologies and processes that will create sustainable industries and jobs and enhance Canada’s competitiveness. ECCC’s programs will also help regions and communities plan for, and adapt to, the impacts of climate change, so as to mitigate threats to health, safety and well-being.
1 In 2015, all United Nations (UN) member states came together and adopted Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. At its heart are 17 Sustainable Development Goals that encompass key social, economic, and environmental challenges.
E-24 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Core Responsibility: Preventing and Managing Pollution
Description
Collaborate with provinces, territories, Indigenous peoples and others to develop and administer environmental standards, guidelines, regulations and risk management instruments to reduce releases and monitor levels of contaminants in air, water and soil; and promote and enforce compliance with environmental laws and regulations.
Planning highlights
Reaching Zero Plastic Waste
The Government of Canada has taken a leadership position in addressing plastic waste both nationally and internationally. As of December 2019, the Ocean Plastics Charterxii, launched under Canada’s 2018 G7 presidency, is supported by 25 countries and over 60 businesses and organizations globally. Environment and Climate Change Canada is leading the Federal Leadership Towards Zero Plastic Waste initiative, a comprehensive federal agenda that aims to increase the knowledge and evidence base about plastic waste and pollution, and to support targeted actions to affect change at each stage of the plastics lifecycle.
Targeted federal actions include advancing regulatory Figure 1: Main areas of action for a circular plastics economy in Canada action to ban harmful single-use plastics when supported by science and where warranted and work with provinces and territories to develop national targets and standards to require companies that manufacture plastic products or packaging are responsible for collecting and recycling them.
To eliminate plastic pollution, ECCC will be providing funding through the Zero Plastic Waste Initiative (ZPWI) for projects that mobilize Canadians to capture and remove plastic pollution or prevent plastic waste from entering the environment and capture and remove plastic pollution from the environment. The ZPWI aims to affect change within and across the plastics lifecycle to increase collection, improve value recovery, and prevent and remove plastic pollution. The initiative supports projects that use an innovative and ecosystem approach that leads to measurable, positive impacts to reduce plastic waste and pollution in Canada.
In 2020-21, ECCC will continue to collaborate with industry and other partners to achieve Canada’s ambitious goals of 100% reusable, recyclable or recoverable plastics by 2030, and increasing recycled content in plastic products where applicable by at least 50% by 2030. A Plastics Innovation Challenge intended to spur innovative solutions related to food packaging, construction waste, and the separation of plastics for recycling will fund the development of three prototypes. Demonstration projects and voluntary agreements in key industry sectors will be developed to advance the implementation of solutions to reduce plastic waste and increase their recovery.
Work with the provinces and territories to implement the Canada-Wide Strategy on Zero Plastic Wastexiii will also continue. The Phase I Action Planxiv was approved by Environment Ministers in June 2019 and implementation is underway. The development of Phase II will be completed in 2020. Further information on ECCC’s work on plastic waste and pollution can be found on the zero plastic waste websitexv.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-25 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan
In 2020-21, Canada will host the World Circular Economy Forum 2020, co-organized by ECCC, on behalf of the Government of Canada, and the Finnish innovation fund Sitra. The World Circular Economy Forum is a global event that brings together leaders, businesses, policymakers, and experts to present solutions for a circular economy. The 2020 forum will provide a global platform for national and international discussions on new business models that use our natural resources more efficiently, minimize waste and pollution, and accelerate the transition to a clean economy.
Protecting the environment and Canadians from harmful substances
To protect the environment and Canadians from harmful substances, ECCC will continue to deliver Canada’s Chemicals Management Planxvi with Health Canada. As of the fall of 2018, the two departments had addressed 3,621 of 4,363 chemicals identified in 2006 as priorities for attention, with the remaining 679 priority chemicals to be addressed as required by the end of FY 2020–21. ECCC and Health Canada will continue their work to set new directions and objectives for managing chemicals beyond 2020, and to support greater transparency and public participation in the notification and risk assessments of new substances and organisms through the New Substances Voluntary Public Engagement Transparency Initiativexvii. ECCC is committed to continuous improvement and will work with Health Canada to better protect people and the environment from harmful substances, including through strengthening the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. (CEPA).
Oil sands monitoring
ECCC will continue to collaborate with the Government of Alberta to ensure oil sands in Alberta are developed and monitored in an environmentally and socially responsible manner. The terms of a 2017 memorandum of understanding renewed both governments’ commitment to use a collective approach that includes Indigenous communities, industry, and governments in its Oil Sands Monitoring (OSM) program. The OSM program is funded by industry through Alberta’s Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act. ECCC will continue to be actively engaged in the OSM program through participation in its governance and by providing scientific expertise, laboratory infrastructure, and leadership to monitoring that considers the impact of oil sands development on air, water, land and biodiversity.
Protecting whales from contaminants Law Enforcement To protect endangered whales, ECCC will continue to increase ECCC continues to move toward a research, strengthen regulatory control and enhance risk-based approach to enforcing enforcement of environmental regulations to reduce federal environmental laws that contaminants affecting endangered whales, including the protect the environment and human Southern Resident Killer Whale and the St. Lawrence Estuary health. ECCC is working closely with Beluga. The Department has proposed amendments to the partners, including provinces and territories, other federal departments, Prohibition of Certain Toxic Substances Regulations 2012 that as well as foreign law enforcement would remove exemptions (flame retardants and oil and water agencies, to protect the environment repellents) for five already prohibited substances, and prohibit and human health. two additional substances (flame retardants) that pose a danger to these species.
Reducing air pollution and improving air quality
Air pollution remains a significant global risk to human health and the environment. Improving air quality in collaboration with partners by reducing harmful emissions will continue to be a priority for ECCC in 2020-21. The Department’s efforts will include working with provinces and territories to implement the Air Quality Management System (AQMS). For example, the Department will review the national ambient air quality standard for fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) to encourage continuous improvement in air quality. In 2020 the Department will publish the final volatile organic compound (VOC) regulations for the petroleum sector and will continue to develop and implement regulations on emissions from off-road compression-ignition and large spark ignition engines. ECCC will also continue its global efforts to reduce transboundary air pollutants, including under the Canada-U.S. Air Quality Agreement and the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution.
E-26 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental
The Multi-sector Air Pollutants Regulations (MSAPR), designed to reduce air pollution from industrial boilers and heaters, cement manufacturing, and stationary spark-ignition engines, were published in June 2016. ECCC will continue to administer the MSAPR, as well as various non-regulatory instruments to reduce air pollution. The Department will also finalize an on-line reporting system for the Multi-sector Air Pollutant Regulation for stationary spark-ignition engines. In addition, ECCC will publish the final Off-Road Compression-Ignition (Mobile and Stationary) and Large Spark-Ignition Engine emission regulations, implement Tier 3 under the On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulation, and implement amendments to the Off-Road Small Spark-Ignition Engine Emission Regulations, which came into force on March 22, 2018.
Protecting Canada’s freshwater resources
In 2020-21, ECCC will continue to focus efforts on the health of Restoring Hamilton Harbour some of Canada’s important freshwater resources: Great Lakes, ECCC continued to collaborate with Lake Winnipeg, and the St. Lawrence River watersheds. the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, In the Great Lakes Basin, home to one in three Canadians (and Stelco, Hamilton-Oshawa Port one in ten Americans), ECCC will build on progress achieved Authority, City of Hamilton, City of through Canada-United States collaboration to restore and Burlington, and Halton Region to protect the Lakes and their significant environmental and clean up the Hamilton Harbour Area economic benefits to both countries. Under the Great Lakes of Concern. Dredging and containing Water Quality Agreement, the two nations have made contaminated sediments within a six- hectare, double-walled engineered significant progress in addressing long-standing environmental containment facility will be finished in xviii degradation in Areas of Concern (which are identified as 2020-21. The next step is to install an having experienced high levels of environmental harm), and the environmental cap on top of the spread of toxic and nuisance algae, particularly in the Lake Erie engineered containment facility basin. The 2019 Progress Report of the Partiesxix reports on which will be finished by 2022-23. progress and points to future priorities. Draft priorities for science Once completed, the site will be and action were open for public comment (summer 2019) and, turned over to the Hamilton-Oshawa once finalized, will guide the work of the governments of both Port Authority, which will maintain the facility in perpetuity and use the site countries for the next three years. as valuable port land.
A new Canada-Ontario Agreement on Great Lakes Water Quality and Ecosystem Health will be finalized in 2020. It will align with Canada’s commitments under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement by addressing key challenges in the Lakes (such as algae in Lake Erie) and focusing action on improving wastewater and stormwater management, reducing pollution (such as chemical pollution and plastic waste), protecting the more than 3,500 species living in the Basin, and addressing invasive species and climate resilience. Funding announced in 2019 ($1 million over three years) for ten new partner-led projects – including one that will create and restore aquatic habitats in the bays and coastal wetlands of Toronto’s Tommy Thompson Park – will advance efforts to address priority areas under the Great Lakes Protection Initiative.
Lake Winnipeg is Canada’s sixth-largest lake and has a basin that drains water from four provinces (Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario) and four states (Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Minnesota). Lake Winnipeg is an important freshwater resource that generates millions of dollars in revenue through hydroelectricity, recreation and commercial freshwater fishing. It is also a significant cultural, social, and economic resource for Indigenous Peoples and communities. Through the Lake Winnipeg Basin Program, ECCC will continue to support nutrient-reduction efforts, basin-wide collaboration, and engage Indigenous Peoples on freshwater issues. Actions funded through the Lake Winnipeg Basin Program (2017- 2022) that reduce nutrient loading to the lake include wetland restoration and water retention. A key priority for 2020-21 is the renewal of the Canada-Manitoba Memorandum of Understanding Respecting Lake Winnipeg and the Lake Winnipeg Basin, which facilitates important collaboration in support of the long-term management of this key freshwater resource.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-27 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan
The St. Lawrence River is recognized worldwide, as reflected in the Ramsar Convention10 designations of its four Wetlands of International Importance, as well as the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) designations of the Lac Saint-Pierre Biosphere Reserve and the Miguasha National Park World Heritage Site. The Department will continue its priority work under the Canada-Québec Agreement on the St. Lawrence (St. Lawrence Action Plan 2011-2026) to conserve, restore, protect, and develop this major river. ECCC will continue its monitoring program, with the results of 21 indicators of water quality to be published in 2020-21.
To protect and conserve freshwater resources across Canada, ECCC will support new EcoAction Community Funding Program projects – community-driven initiatives that will divert and reduce harmful substances, improve freshwater management, and increase climate resilience through action involving the development and/or restoration of natural infrastructure.
In other major basins, such as the Saint John River (Wԥlastԥkw) watershed, the Department will continue efforts to increase coordination and collaboration with other government departments, Indigenous people, and stakeholders to identify and advance water quality and ecosystem priorities, goals, and objectives.
To further protect Canada’s freshwater resources, ECCC will advance amendments to the Pulp and Paper Effluent Regulations that will strengthen protections. ECCC plans to publish proposed Coal Mining Effluent Regulations, which will be published for consultations, and to initiate preliminary consultations to advance the development of a new Oil Sands Effluent Regulations.
With the support of Agriculture Canada and Agri-Food Canada, ECCC we will explore ways to create a new Canada Water Agency, which will work with provinces, territories, indigenous communities, local communities and others to build on existing work and find the best solutions for maintaining safe, clean, and well-managed water resources.
Protecting coastlines and oceans
ECCC will continue to be a key partner in Canada’s $1.5 billion Oceans Protection Plan (OPP), led by Transport Canada, to build a world-leading marine safety system and strengthen stewardship of Canada’s oceans and coasts. The Department’s major contribution is the provision of expertise in ocean modelling, spill behaviour, and other scientific advice to support improved prevention, emergency planning, and response to oil spills. ECCC will also continue its ongoing contribution of weather and environmental data to support healthier and safer coasts.
Strengthening sustainable development across the Government of Canada
ECCC is responsible for leading the development of a federal strategy for sustainable development every three years. The 2019-2022 Federal Sustainable Development Strategy, tabled on June 19, 2019, sets out federal priorities, goals, and targets, as well as the actions to achieve them. ECCC’s Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators program supports this work through data and information that tracks Canada's performance on key environmental sustainability issues including climate change and air quality, water quality and availability, and protecting nature. An Act to Amend the Federal Sustainable Development Act will come into force on December 1, 2020, and will expand the number of federal organizations required to report on their sustainable development activities from 26 to more than 90.
10 The Ramsar Convention was adopted as the first of the modern global nature conservation conventions. It is a highly regarded and active multilateral environmental agreement. The mission of the Ramsar Convention is the wise use of all wetlands through local and national actions and international cooperation, as a contribution towards achieving sustainable development throughout the world. Canada joined the Convention in 1981. It is named after Ramsar in Iran, where the Convention was signed in 1971.
E-28 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental
United Nations’ 2030 Agenda and Sustainable Development Goalsxx
The diverse programs and strategies under ECCC’s core responsibility for Preventing and Managing Pollution will contribute very substantially to more than half of the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals. Continued enforcement of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act 1999 and key provisions of the Fisheries Act, coupled with the implementation of the Chemicals Management Plan and advancement of regulations to protect air and water quality and promote clean fuels, will support healthy lives and well-being for all (Goal 3xxi), while also advancing sustainable management of water and sanitation (Goal 6xxii), promoting sustainable production and consumption practices (Goal 12xxiii) and fighting climate change (Goal 13xxiv).
Through implementation of domestic and international measures focused on responsible management of waste, protection of oceans, and the elimination and reduction of plastics in the environment, ECCC will support sustainable use of marine resources (Goal 14xxv) and promote inclusive approaches to sustainable development, industrialization and urbanization (Goal 8xxvi, Goal 9xxvii, Goal 11xxviii, Goal 15xxix, and Goal 16xxx). ECCC will also continue to be an active partner and leader in global action on pollution prevention and management (Goal 17xxxi).
Planned results for Preventing and Managing Pollution
Departmental Result: Canadians have clean air
Departmental result indicator Target Date to 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 achieve target actual result actual result actual result
Percentage of Canadians living in areas 85% 2030 64% for the 70% for the 77% for the where air quality standards are 2012–14 data 2013-15 data 2014–16 achieved period. period. data period (most recent available).11
Departmental Result: Canadians have clean water
Departmental result indicator Target Date to 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 achieve target actual result actual result actual result
Percentage of wastewater systems 100% 2040 77% 76% 77% where effluent quality standards are achieved
Departmental Result: The Canadian environment is protected from harmful substances
Departmental result indicator Target Date to 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 achieve target actual result actual result actual result
Percentage of substances that are 100% March 31, Not available. added to Schedule 1 of the CEPA (Toxic 2021 This indicator is being retired and replaced substances list) because they pose a risk with a new indicator. to the environment that have controls in First results for the new indicator will be place within legislated timelines. reported for the 2019–20 fiscal year.
11 Air quality monitoring results are subject to data validation and are available 18-24 months after data collection. In the 2018–19 and 2019–20 Departmental Plans, data were reported in the year the data were collected.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-29 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan
Core Responsibility: Conserving Nature
Description
Protect and recover species at risk and their critical habitat; conserve and protect healthy populations of migratory birds; engage and enable provinces and territories, Indigenous peoples, stakeholders, and the public to increase protected areas and contribute to conservation and stewardship activities; expand and manage the Department’s protected areas; and collaborate with domestic and international partners to advance the conservation of biodiversity and sustainable development.
Planning highlights
Conserving land, inland waters and coastal and marine areas
ECCC will continue its ambitious work toward the protection and conservation of 17% of terrestrial areas and inland water and 10% of marine and coastal areas by the end of 2020. The Department will continue to lead the Government of Canada’s efforts to strengthen its commitment to nature and its conservation goals.
Canada made a historic investment of $1.3 billion over five years (Budget 2018) under Canada’s Nature Legacy Initiativexxxii, part of which provided $500 million, matched by partners, to establish the Canada Nature Fundxxxiii. Programs under the Canada Nature Fund will expand a connected network of protected and conserved areas across Canada. They include: The Pathway to Canada Target 1 Challenge program, which provides up to $175 million to support the implementation of new conservation projects across all provinces and territories. The Natural Heritage Conservation Program, which launched in April 2019, provides a $100 million investment to help protect private lands.
Looking ahead, the federal Government intends to conserve 25% of lands and oceans by 2025 and work toward 30% by 2030. ECCC and Parks Canada Agency (PCA) will work with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) to develop an ambitious plan to achieve these targets. Recognizing that the loss of nature is a global issue requiring global action, Canada will advocate that countries around the world set a 30% conservation goal for 2030 as well.
ECCC will collaborate with local partners, such as communities, Indigenous peoples and environmental organizations, to meet its conservation goals. Some examples of the diverse partnerships and approaches in which ECCC will engage in 2020-21 include collaboration with:
the Ktunaxa Nation Council Society, which is one of the many Indigenous proponents ECCC is supporting to create an Indigenous Protected and Conserved Area (IPCA). Under the Target 1 Challenge, they received $16 million over four years to lead the creation of an IPCA in the Qat’muk area, which includes the Jumbo Valley in the Purcell Mountains. This IPCA will conserve and protect habitat for wildlife including grizzly bear (western population), whitebark pine, and Southern Mountain caribou critical habitat, all of which are species at risk
DFO and the Montreal Port Authority to designate a group of 27 islands in the St. Lawrence River as National Wildlife Areas. The islands are in a geographic corridor heavily used by migratory birds and provide important habitat for species at risk, including the Least Bittern and Short-eared Owl.
E-30 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental
the Government of Yukon and First Nations to support the Peel Watershed Regional Land-Use Plan, which creates new protected and conserved areas to safeguard the watershed and the wildlife that call it home. The Peel Watershed is home to 15 species at risk, including both the barren ground and boreal caribou. ECCC will implement an improved risk-based approach to enforcing federal wildlife laws that protect species at risk, protected areas, migratory birds as well as wild plants and animals in international and interprovincial trade. ECCC will continue to work closely with provinces and territories, other federal departments as well as foreign law enforcement agencies and intergovernmental organizations to protect domestic species as well as exotic species in Canadian commerce. Global wildlife crime, including poaching, smuggling, and trafficking of animals and plants, is estimated to be worth over US$155 billion per year, making it the world’s fourth most lucrative form of crime.
These conservation initiatives and many others underway will help Canada meet its 2020 and 2025 conservation targets, advance reconciliation with Indigenous peoples, protect and recover species at risk, and improve biodiversity for all.
Pan-Canadian approach to conserving and protecting species
In 2019-20, ECCC collaborated with its provincial and territorial counterparts to begin the implementation of a new Pan-Canadian Approach to Transforming Species at Risk Conservation in Canadaxxxiv (Pan- Canadian Approach). With support from the Canada Nature Fund, the approach reflects a shift to more multi-species and ecosystem-based conservation, and more targeted and collaborative FPT efforts focussed on conservation planning and action on shared priority places, species, and sectors. Provinces and territories continue to lead efforts to recover species at risk and other priority species on lands under their jurisdiction, with support and partnership from ECCC.
In 2020-21, the Department will continue to advance implementation of the Pan-Canadian Approach in collaboration with provinces and territories, Indigenous peoples and stakeholders. Indigenous organizations and stakeholders (e.g. ENGOs, industry) from across Canada will be encouraged to participate in conservation action planning initiatives for the six priority species identified by federal, provincial and territorial governments under the Pan-Canadian Approach, thus ensuring that their knowledge and ongoing actions will meaningfully contribute to the advancement of protection and recovery measures for these species. For 11 priority places, projects will enable partner and stakeholder engagement, cooperative conservation action planning, and the implementation of on-the-ground actions for species at risk. Work in these priority places will be complemented in 15 Community-Nominated Priority Places, selected through a call for proposals in 2019-20. In each community, multiple partners will take action together to protect and recover species at risk. In addition, Priority Sectors Initiatives will advance partner and stakeholder engagement to co-create conservation action plans with the agriculture, forest, and urban development sectors that seek to align sector policy and practice with positive outcomes for species at risk conservation and sector sustainability.
Guided by the Pan-Canadian Approach, the Department will continue to implement the Species at Risk Act through listing, recovery planning and protection action. ECCC will also engage with provinces, territories, Indigenous communities, scientists, industry and other stakeholders to evaluate the effectiveness of the existing Species at Risk Act and assess the need for modernization.
In partnership with the Nature Conservancy of Canada, Ducks Unlimited Canada, Island Nature Trust, and the Manitoba Habitat Heritage Corporation, among others, the Department will provide $10 million over two years as part of the Government’s sustained commitment to invest up to $20 million over four years to support the North American Waterfowl Management Planxxxv, which helps protect wetlands and migratory birds, including species at risk. The Department will also continue to engage with external partners on the advancement of the Migratory Birds Strategy, and enforce and promote compliance with federal wildlife legislation that protects plant and animal species, including in interprovincial and international trade.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-31 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan
Partnering with Indigenous Peoples
ECCC is committed to meaningful engagement with Indigenous peoples in conservation. The Department will continue working to renew nation-to-nation relationships with Indigenous peoples as part of the implementation of the Pan-Canadian Approach and the federal Species at Risk Act. Under the Canada Nature Fund, partnerships with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis will advance the conservation of species at risk in a manner that recognizes and enables Indigenous leadership, knowledge, and interests in land and resource management. Projects will contribute to building Indigenous partners’ capacity to: lead the development and implementation of recovery and protection measures for at-risk species (including several culturally significant caribou species); negotiate and implement conservation agreements for the collaborative conservation of species at risk; and support meaningful participation in Species at Risk Act consultation and cooperation processes. The engagement of Indigenous peoples and use of traditional knowledge in the conservation and protection of species respond to recommendations from the Horizontal Evaluation of the Species at Risk Program (June 2018).
ECCC will continue to implement its Indigenous Guardians Pilot Programxxxvi to support First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities in protecting sensitive areas and species, monitoring ecological health, and maintaining Indigenous cultural sites. With funding of $25 million over four years (2018 to 2022), the Government of Canada recognizes the impact and invaluable contributions of Indigenous communities to nature conservation and offers an opportunity to advance true reconciliation. The Pilot Program is implemented jointly with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis using individualized approaches that respect and recognize each group’s unique perspectives, rights, responsibilities and needs. Under the pilot program, ECCC will support Indigenous conservation leadership across the country through 33 new projects, including community-based monitoring initiatives, actions to protect clean air and water, and initiatives to protect and restore healthy ecosystems, cultural resources, and species at risk The projects also support effective partnerships between First Nations, Métis, Inuit and the Government of Canada. Supporting Indigenous leadership in conservation is a central component of Canada’s effort to double the amount of nature protected in our nation’s lands and oceans.
Impact assessment
Under the Impact Assessment Act, ECCC will provide expertise and advice related to impacts of proposed projects on climate change, air quality, water quality, environmental preparedness and emergencies, and biodiversity. This will include developing guidance for project proponents on standard methodologies to address common issues. The Department will also publish the final Strategic Assessment on Climate Change (SACC) and contribute to the federal approach to cumulative effects under the new Act.
United Nations’ 2030 Agenda and Sustainable Development Goalsxxxvii
ECCC’s new Pan-Canadian Approach to Species at Risk and its substantial new investments in federal and other protected areas under its Nature Legacy initiative, combined with ongoing action in wetlands protection, habitat stewardship, and wildlife conservation, will serve to: conserve biodiversity and the quality and viability of natural ecosystems; preserve and restore air and water quality; and promote sustainable land use and wildlife harvesting practices. These will constitute support primarily for life in water (Goal 14xxxviii) and life on land (Goal 15xxxix).
E-32 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Core Responsibility: Predicting Weather and Environmental Conditions
Description
Monitor weather, water, air quality and climate conditions; provide forecasts, information and warnings to the Canadian public and targeted sectors through a range of service delivery options; conduct research; develop and maintain computer-based models for predicting weather and other environmental conditions; and collaborate and exchange data with other national meteorological services and with international organizations.
Planning highlights
In 2020-21, ECCC will continue to provide Canadians with accurate and timely information on weather and environmental conditions to help them make decisions about their health, safety and economic well- being. To do so, ECCC will rely on scientific expertise, a leading-edge approach to data management and analysis, and innovative information techniques12. Using a state-of-the-art supercomputer solution to bring together thousands of observations about Canada’s environment and other data available from domestic and international partners, ECCC’s meteorologists and scientists work around the clock in prediction centres across the country to deliver forecasts for the weather, extreme weather conditions, and water-related events. This helps Canadians and weather-sensitive businesses prepare for weather events and become more resilient to the consequences of climate change. For example, the Canadian Hurricane Centre meteorologists track the intensity and path of storms and issue warnings for those with potential to affect Canada or its waters. In addition, ECCC will continue to leverage social media channels to broaden its reach when notifying Canadians of the potential for high-impact weather events.
New radars, improved short-term forecasts
The Government of Canada is investing $111 million in the Canadian Weather Radar Replacement Programxl to replace outdated technology with a minimum of 27 new radars by March 2023. Twelve new radar systems have been installed and a further 7 new radars are planned to be installed in several communities across Canada in 2020-21. Radars are the primary tools used by meteorologists to forecast short-term severe weather events associated with thunderstorms, tornadoes, ice storms, and blizzards. The new radars use the most modern technology available and will provide more detailed information on precipitation type and storm structure, and allow ECCC to give Canadians greater lead time to protect themselves and their property.
12 “Innovative information techniques” is a term used in reference to the use of supercomputers and social media channels to predict and disseminate weather information.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-33 Environment & Climate Change 2020-21 Departmental Plan
Modernizing national water monitoring for Canadians
Monitoring the quantity and flow of water is increasingly important, as Canada is warming twice as fast as the global average. A warmer climate means more weather extremes, including higher storm surges, thus increasing coastal flooding and urban flood risks. Better information on water levels means Canadians will have access to the information they need to be prepared. In 2020-21, ECCC’s National Hydrological Service will continue to modernize and strengthen its engineering and technical capacity, modernize its infrastructure, and put in place new technologies to gather and analyze water information. The National Hydrological Service will continue to work in partnership with the provinces and territories to co-develop capability for the prediction of water quantity, starting with five major basins in Canada (the Saskatchewan, Nelson, Mackenzie, Columbia and Churchill Rivers) and the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. This work will be completed for the Churchill and Mackenzie Rivers in the next two years. This major initiative represents a $90 million federal government investment over five years, ending in 2022-2023. ECCC will continue to provide expert advice and recommendations to inter-jurisdictional and international water boards. This investment will also modernize engineering models and systems for better service delivery to partner agencies involved with domestic and transboundary water management across the country.
United Nations’ 2030 Agenda and Sustainable Development Goalsxli (UNSD)
ECCC’s weather and environmental observations, forecasts and warnings, including its water monitoring programs, are vital for governments, industry, and citizens alike to make daily decisions related to weather-dependent economic activities. ECCC’s Air Quality Program and Air Quality Index, together with its extreme weather warnings, contribute to public health and safety (Goal 3xlii). Its weather forecasts play a vital role in assisting farming, forestry, transportation and other sectors plan and schedule their operations for optimal production and sustainability (Goal 12xliii), while water-monitoring services contribute to responsible water conservation and use (Goal 6xliv). More generally, the accumulated knowledge about weather and climate patterns and trends support development of effective long-term strategies for water and air quality management, action on climate change, and conservation of marine resources for sustainable development (Goal 13xlv and Goal 14xlvi).
© Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Environment, 2020. Reprinted with permission. The full report can be accessed at no cost by visiting https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/corporate/transparency/priorities-management/departmental-plans/departmen- tal-plan-2020-2021.html.
E-34 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environmental management practices in Canadian businesses, 2020 Up-Date Environmental 2016
Environmental management practices are protocols that businesses adopt to reduce their impact on the environment. They can be implemented for various reasons, such as compliance with legislation and government regulations or a company directive on best practices. Businesses in scope in this fact sheet belong to manufacturing industries, logging (except contract), oil and gas extraction, mining and quarrying, electric power generation, transmission and distribution and natural gas distribution.
Half of businesses have adopted at least one environmental management practice
In 2016, just over half of businesses (51%) had at least one environmental management practice. Among these businesses, 47% had adopted at least three, one-fifth (21%) had adopted two, and the remaining third (32%) had adopted one.
As in 2014, the two most commonly used practices in 2016 were environmental management systems (23% of Canadian businesses) and energy audits (22%) (Chart 1). In contrast, few businesses reported using environmental voluntary agreements (5%), down three percentage points from 2014. Profiles of four of the most common practices are provided later in this text.
Chart 1 Percentage of Canadian enterprises with environmental management practices, 2016
Environmental management system 23 Energy audit (past 3 years) 22 Energy management or monitoring system 19 Implementation of a pollution prevention plan 17 Green procurement policy 12 Perform a greenhouse gas emissions inventory 11 Life cycle analysis 10 ISO 14000 family certification 9 Environmental incentives 7 Impacted by a supplier's or client's environmental supply chain management policy 7 Implementation of an environmental supply chain 7 management policy labelling of products 6 Environmental voluntary agreements 5 Other environmental management practices 4 Participate in carbon-trading or purchase/sell carbon-offset credits 2
0 5 10 15 20 25 percent
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Environmental Protection Expenditures, 2016. Table 38-10-0005-01.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-35 Environmental Management Practices in Canadian Businesses, 2016
Environmental management practices are most common in the natural gas distribution and oil and gas extraction industries
In most of the industries studied, more than half of the businesses had adopted at least one environmental management practice (Chart 2). In four industries, more than three-quarters of businesses had implemented at least one practice. The natural gas distribution and oil and gas extraction industries led the trend, with 81% of their businesses using at least one environmental management practice. Half (51%) of natural gas distribution businesses had adopted at least six environmental management practices.
The adoption of environmental management practices increases with the number of employees
The larger the business, as measured by the number of employees, the more likely it is to adopt at least one environmental management practice. In 2016, 95% of large enterprises (1,000 employees or more) had adopted at least one practice, compared with 84% of enterprises with 500 to 999 employees, 67% of enterprises with 100 to 499 employees, and 45% of small businesses (less than 100 employees).
More than two-thirds of employees work for businesses with at least one practice
In general, businesses that had adopted at least one environmental management practice in 2016 had 69% of the employment share. As a result, more than two-thirds of workers in the industries of interest were employed by businesses that had adopted at least one practice. Of course, this proportion varied by type of practice. For example, businesses with ISO 14000 certification had 27% of the employment share, while those that had participated in environmental incentive programs had 15%.
Profiles of four of the most common practices Environmental management system
Nearly one-quarter (23%) of Canadian businesses had an environmental management system (EMS) in 2016 (Chart 1), making it the most popular practice. EMSs are a management tool that businesses use to assess and control the environmental impact of their activities. This practice was most frequent in the natural gas distribution (68%), oil and gas extraction (68%) and mining and quarrying industry (63%) (Chart 2).
Having an EMS was also the most common practice in all business size groups. The percentage of companies with an EMS increased with company size, reaching 88% among large enterprises (1,000 employees or more) (Chart 3). Also, nearly half (45%) of employees in the industries of interest worked in businesses with an EMS.
E-36 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Environmental management practices in Canadian businesses, 2016
Chart 2 2020 Up-Date Environmental Percentage of Canadian enterprises using selected environmental management practices, by industry, 2016
percent 80
68 68 70 65 63 58 59 60 60 50 50 43 43 39 40 36 35 34 33 32 33 30 29 22 19 21 20 15 16 11 10
0 Environmental management Energy audit (past 3 years) Energy management or monitoring Perform a greenhouse gas system system emissions inventory
Primary metal manufacturing Mining and quarrying Oil and gas extraction Natural gas distribution Beverage and tobacco product manufacturing Transportation equipment manufacturing
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Environmental Protection Expenditures, 2016. Special tabulations.
Chart 3 Percentage of Canadian enterprises using selected environmental management practices, by size of enterprise, 2016
percent 100 88 90
80 73 68 70 70 62 59 60 54 51 50 38 40 34 30 30 23 20 17 17 15 10 6
0 Environmental management system Energy audit (past 3 years) Energy management or monitoring Perform a greenhouse gas emissions system inventory
Enterprises with fewer than 100 employees Enterprises with 100 to 499 employees Enterprises with 500 to 999 employees Enterprises with 1,000 or more employees
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Environmental Protection Expenditures, 2016. Table 38-10-0005-01.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-37 Environmental Management Practices in Canadian Businesses, 2016
Energy audit
In the past three years, 22% of Canadian businesses had conducted an energy audit (Chart 1). These audits include conducting analysis of the company’s energy consuming systems and identifying potential areas reducing energy consumption. In 2016, energy audits were most common in the natural gas distribution industry, with 43% of businesses performing one (Chart 2). In comparison, energy audits were only performed by one-third of businesses in the following three industries: primary metal manufacturing (34%), transportation equipment manufacturing (33%) and mining and quarrying industry (32%).
In businesses with less than 100 employees or 100 to 499 employees, energy audits were the second most common practice (after EMSs), being adopted by 17% and 34% of their businesses respectively (Chart 3). Energy audits were performed primarily in enterprises with 1,000 employees or more (59%). However, energy audits were only the sixth most common practice in large businesses. Among the practices that came ahead of energy audits were ISO 14000 family certification (63%) and pollution prevention plans (72%). In 2016, the use of energy audits was associated with 37% of the employment share.
Energy management or monitoring system
In 2016, nearly one in five Canadian businesses (19%) had an energy management or monitoring system in place (Chart 1). These systems help companies to manage energy use to improve energy efficiency. Energy management or monitoring systems were most popular in the natural gas distribution industry, with 58% of companies implementing one (Chart 2). Meanwhile, 36% of businesses in the primary metal manufacturing industry and 35% of businesses in the beverage and tobacco product manufacturing industry had an energy management or monitoring system.
In enterprises with 500 to 999 employees, energy management or monitoring system was the second most common practice (after EMSs), used by 62% of these companies (Chart 3). In 2016, the use of energy management or monitoring systems was associated with 37% of the employment share.
Perform a greenhouse gas emissions inventory
A greenhouse gas emissions inventory is an estimate of the amount of greenhouse gas emissions businesses generate in a given period. This practice was used in 11% of Canadian businesses in 2016 (Chart 1), but it was more common in certain industries, such as mining and quarrying (65%), natural gas distribution (60%) and oil and gas extraction (59%) (Chart 2).
This practice was the second most often used by large enterprises (73%) (after EMSs) and the third most commonly used by enterprises with 500 to 999 employees (54%) (Chart 3). Overall, the use of a greenhouse gas emissions inventory was associated with 31% of the employment share.
About the Environmental Protection Expenditures Survey
This release presents data from the 2016 Environmental Protection Expenditures Survey. It is conducted with just over 3,500 establishments in selected primary industries and in the manufacturing sector. This survey produces estimates of the capital and operating expenditures of Canadian businesses to protect the environment. Measures of industrial spending on environmental protection are restricted to spending to comply with current or anticipated regulations, conventions or voluntary agreements. It also collects data on the environmental management practices adopted by establishments.
Statistics Canada. “Environmental management practices in Canadian businesses, 2016”. Last modified June 19, 2019. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/16-508-x/16-508-x2019003-eng.htm. Accessed July 2, 2020.
E-38 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Canadian Industry and Environmental Protection, 2006 to 2016 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Introduction
The manner in which Canadians conduct their daily activities can have a profound impact on their surroundings thereby compelling them to adapt their practices to be less harmful to the environment. This is even more of a reality for Canadian businesses as their operations are significant contributors to the amount of pollution and environmental pressures generated each year in Canada. For this reason, it is important to monitor the amount and the type of environmental protection that Canadian industry has undertaken over the years.
The following article highlights expenditures made by Canadian industry to protect the environment from industrial activities between 2006 and 2016.
What you should know about this study
Data sources
The main data source for this paper is the Environmental Protection Expenditures Survey (EPES), which is conducted every two years. The purpose of the survey is to provide a measure of the expenditures made by Canadian businesses to comply with present or anticipated environmental regulations, conventions and voluntary agreements. In addition, the survey collects information on environmental management practices and environmental technologies used by industry for the purpose of preventing or abating pollution.
1. How does environmental protection work in Canada?
In Canada, environmental protection regulatory powers are shared between provincial and federal governments. Each of these entities can put regulations into place that can lead to environmental protection expenditures as defined by the EPES. For example, in 2012, under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, the federal government established the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Coal-Fired Generation of Electricity
Regulations. In a nutshell, the objective of these regulations is to minimize carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions during the production of electricity using coal as a fuel.1 In order to comply with these regulations, coal-fired generating stations are required to make environmental protection expenditures such as monitoring or mitigation equipment acquisition, amongst others.
While new regulations are put into place by government, industry also contributes to the environmental protection framework through other mechanisms. For example, several industry associations have become active participants in environmental protection through voluntary actions. For instance, from 2008 to 2013, the vinyl industry established an agreement with the government of Canada to prevent the release of tin stabilizers into the environment by allowing site verification and agreeing to corrective actions if needed. In 2015, the agreement was renewed until 2020.
2. Environmental protection expenditures by industries
In order to comply with environmental protection regulations, conventions and voluntary agreements, businesses often incur expenses to purchase equipment as well as environmental services to prevent or clean up pollution. In 2006, Canadian industry spent approximately $8.8 billion on environmental protection expenditures, and by 2014, this amount increased by 26%, peaking at close to $11.8 billion. In 2016, environmental protection expenditures decreased to nearly $8.4 billion, with a little over $3.2 billion being capital investments. The majority of the decrease in environmental protection expenditures observed from 2014 to 2016 was a direct result of lower capital investment expenditures.
1. For more details on the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Coal-Fired Generation of Electricity Regulations, please visit https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/ eng/regulations/SOR-2012-167/.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-39 Canadian Industry and Environmental Protection, 2006 to 2016
As shown in chart 1, in 2016, the oil and gas extraction industry accounted for the largest share of environmental protection expenditures made during the year at 44% of the total. This has been the case historically, as the industry accounted for an average share of 41% of total environmental protection expenditures in each reference year from 2006 to 2016.
The mining and quarrying, primary metal manufacturing and electric power generation, transmission and distribution industries were also key contributors to national environmental protection expenditures made by Canadian businesses. In 2016, these three industries combined to represent more than a quarter of all environmental protection expenditures.
These industries require the implementation of numerous environmental measures and practices to prevent pollution and environmental damage that can occur during the production process. For example, businesses engaged in the oil and gas extraction industry are required to perform reclamation activities (e.g. revegetation, remediation) on lands they have disturbed during their production cycle. Similarly, businesses taking part in mining and quarrying may have to undergo environmental assessments before they are granted a permit to drill.2
Chart 1 Environmental Protection Expenditures for Selected Industries, 2006-2016
millions of dollars 14,000 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
- Total, all industries Oil and gas extraction Primary metal Mining and quarrying Electric power generation, manufacturing transmission and distribution
Source: Statistics Canada, Table 38-10-0042-01, accessed January 21st, 2019.
3. Environmental protection expenditures by type
Statistics Canada classifies environmental protection expenditures into nine distinct types of activities as shown below:
• Environmental monitoring • Environmental assessments and audits • Reclamation and decommissioning • Wildlife and habitat protection • Waste management and sewerage services • Pollution abatement and control processes • Pollution prevention processes • Fees, fines and licences • Other types of environmental protection
2. For more details about environmental assessments in Canada, see: https://www.canada.ca/en/impact-assessment-agency/services/environmental-assessments/ basics-environmental-assessment.html.
E-40 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Canadian Industry and Environmental Protection, 2006 to 2016
In 2016, waste management and sewerage services, pollution prevention processes and pollution abatement 2020 Up-Date Environmental and control processes were the categories in which the majority of business expenditures were made as they combined for over $6 billion in spending. Alone, pollution abatement and control processes accounted for a little under $2.6 billion of all environmental protection expenditures followed by pollution prevention processes and waste management services which contributed $1.2 billion and $2.2 billion respectively. These three categories combined represented the largest environmental expenditure share in each survey cycle since 2006.
Meanwhile, fees, fines and licenses and wildlife and habitat protection were the categories where the least amount was spent, averaging approximately 4% of all environmental protection expenditures for each reference period. The gap in expenditures between the different categories can partly be attributed to the relatively low amount of capital investments required to put some of these measures into application.
Pollution prevention and pollution abatement and control expenditures
Generally speaking, there are two stages during the production process where pollution can be treated. The first stage is at the source of the pollution and these measures are called pollution prevention processes. Simply put, they imply the use of technologies, equipment, or processes that reduce or eliminate pollution and/or waste before it is created. This can be accomplished, for example, by using material substitution to remove polluting materials from the production process, or by installing more efficient equipment that produces fewer pollutants during use.
The other possible stage where pollution can be treated in the production process, is after the pollution or waste has been created. These types of processes are called pollution abatement and control processes. An example can be found in the nickel industry where scrubbers are used in the exhaust streams to reduce the amount of air pollutants released to the environment.
Pollution prevention is considered a more proactive and effective strategy toward environmental protection, but it implies the restructuring of the production process. Furthermore, eliminating waste at the source can be more efficient for businesses as it can help them achieve cost savings on expenditures such as environmental clean-up or other environmental liabilities.3
Chart 2 shows that from 2006 to 2014, capital investments made by Canadian businesses on pollution abatement and control processes and pollution prevention processes mostly progressed in opposite directions. In 2006, pollution abatement and control capital expenditures were estimated at a little over $900 million and reached close to $3.1 billion in 2014. In 2016, overall pollution abatement and control investments reached their lowest level since 2006, at $933 million. The decrease observed reflects an overall downturn in the oil and gas industry which was largely a result of declining prices in crude oil and natural gas.4
Meanwhile, pollution prevention capital expenditures were estimated at over $1.5 billion dollars in 2006 and decreased to $700 million in 2016. The main industry driving this trend was the oil and gas extraction industry for which pollution abatement and control investments went up by more than fourfold between 2006 and 2014. Other significant increases were observed in the primary metal manufacturing industry where pollution abatement investments doubled over the same period.
3. According to Environment Canada fact sheet titled How Can Pollution Prevention and Pollution Prevention Planning Improve My Business. For more details, please visit https://www.ec.gc.ca/planp2-p2plan/default.asp?lang=En&n=6E15F505-1. 4. For details, see, https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/171006/dq171006b-eng.htm.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-41 Canadian Industry and Environmental Protection, 2006 to 2016
Chart 2 Pollution prevention and pollution abatement and control capital investments ($ million)
millions of dollars 3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Pollution abatement and control processes (end-of-pipe) Pollution prevention processes
Source: Statistics Canada, Table 38-10-0043, accessed: February 7th 2019.
The main driver contributing to the increase in pollution abatement investments from 2010 to 2014 was the expansion in the oil and gas, and mining and quarrying industries. This led to a need to invest in pollution treatment solutions to support the added production. During the same period, many pollution reduction innovations were introduced to the market as a response to regulations that fell into the pollution abatement category. For example, the introduction of Directive 074 by Alberta Energy Regulators (AER) regarding tailings performance made it necessary to find alternatives in the way tailing ponds were managed.5 Since tailing management techniques occur after the waste is created, the adoption of new techniques led to increased investments in pollution abatement expenditures. The decrease also coincides with a reduction in the distribution of pollution prevention methods among all industries.
Environmental media targeted by businesses environmental operational expenditures
Operating expenditures are described as expenses made by businesses to successfully carry out day-to-day activities. These include expenses incurred for labour, training, material and purchased services. For example, waste management provided by a third-party or staff training on environmental management fall under this category. Chart 3 provides an overview of the evolution in the distribution of environmental operating expenditures by medium between 2010 and 2016.
5. According to Nicholas Beier, Ward Wilson, Adedji Dunmola and David Sego 2013 paper titled Impact of flocculation-based dewatering on the shear strength of oil sands fine tailings. For more details, please visit https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0262.
E-42 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Canadian Industry and Environmental Protection, 2006 to 2016
Chart 3 2020 Up-Date Environmental Share of operating expenditures on pollution abatement and control (end-of-pipe) and pollution prevention by environmental medium, 2010 and 2016
2010 2016
28% 34%
43%
51%
3%
3%
11% 25% 1% 0% Air Noise, radiation, and vibration On-site contained solid and liquid waste Other environmental media Surface water
Source: Statistics Canada, Table 38-10-0120, accessed: February 14th 2019.
In 2010, more than half (51%) of businesses’ operating expenditures on pollution abatement and prevention were directed toward the treatment of air pollution. In 2016, the share of expenditures for this category decrease to 43%. Similarly, the share of operating expenditures on surface water also decreased from 34% to 28% between 2010 and 2016.
During the same period, the share of expenditures aimed at on-site contained solid and liquid waste more than doubled, increasing from 11% in 2010 to 25% in 2016. Meanwhile, the share of expenditures on noise, radiation, vibration and other environmental media remained steady between 2010 and 2016 at around 3 to 4 percent.
4. Participation in environmental practices
In addition to pollution prevention and abatement, a third category of potential environmental expenditures are environmental practices, which are protocols that businesses adopt to reduce their impact on the environment. Canada’s environmental protection strategy often avoids imposing compulsory measures and rather relies on co-operation between governments and industry.6 For instance, companies are strongly encouraged by different levels of government to engage in environmental management practices such as the implementation of pollution prevention plans or establishing green procurement policies, but in most industries these practices are not mandatory. As a result, the level of participation in environmental management practices varies among individual businesses.
Chart 4 shows the percentage of establishments that used at least one environmental management practice during each EPES reference year from 2008 to 2016. Overall, the participation rate increased from 32% in 2008 to 51% in 2016 for all establishments regardless of size. In the latest iteration of the survey, environmental management systems and energy audits were the most common environmental management practices among all businesses regardless of size.
6. Based on Irene Henriques and Perry Sadorsky paper on Environmental Policy Tools and Firm Level Management Practices in Canada.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-43 Canadian Industry and Environmental Protection, 2006 to 2016
Chart 4 Distribution businesses using at least one environmental practices by establishment size
percent 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Total, all establishments Establishments with fewer than 100 employees Establishments with 100 to 499 employees Establishments with 500 to 999 employees Establishments with 1,000 or more employees
Source: Statistics Canada, table 38-10-0005-01, accessed January 21st, 2019.
In 2016, establishments with 1,000 or more employees were the group with the highest percentage of businesses using at least one environmental practice, reaching 95%. Environmental management systems and the development of a greenhouse gas inventory were the most common practices among these businesses, with a participation rate of 88% and 73% respectively. From 2008 to 2016, green procurement activities and life-cycle analysis showed the most important percentage increase among all environmental practices, increasing by 15% and 16% respectively.
In contrast, businesses with fewer than 100 employees had the lowest rate of participation in environmental management practices with a rate of 45% in 2016, representing a percentage increase of 19% from 2008 levels. For this group, the most common environmental management practices were the implementation of environmental management systems (17%), energy audits (17%) and the implementation of energy management or monitoring systems (15%).
Overall, there is a noticeable trend where businesses with more employees have higher participation rates in environmental management practices. A factor that can likely explain this tendency is that larger businesses usually have more resources and skilled employees at their disposal to adopt these practices. Additionally, they may also be getting more stakeholder pressure to do so.7 That being said, when faced with stakeholder pressures, smaller businesses might be in a position to more easily address some environmental concerns due to their ability to react more quickly than larger firms.8
7. Based on Irene Henriques and Perry Sadorsky 2013 paper on Environmental Practices and Performance in Canada. 8. According to findings from N. Darnall, I. Henriques and P. Sadorsky 2010 study on the influence of stakeholders on firm size titled Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size.
Statistics Canada. “Canadian Industry and Environmental Protection, 2006 to 2016”. Last modified December 18, 2019. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/16-002-x/2019001/article/00001-eng.htm. Accessed July 3, 2020.
E-44 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Air Quality 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Air pollutant emissions
Air pollution problems, such as smog and acid rain, result from the release of pollutants into the atmosphere. The majority of these pollutants are released through human activities, such as transportation, the burning of fuels for electricity and heating, and a variety of industrial activities. The indicators on sulphur oxides (SOX), nitrogen oxides (NOX), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbon monoxide (CO), ammonia (NH3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) report emissions released through human activities.
Summary Key results
In 2017, emissions of 5 key air pollutants SOX, NOX, VOCs, CO and PM2.5 ranged from 69% to 15% lower than in 1990 Emissions of NH3 were 19% higher than in 1990
Figure 1. Air pollutant emissions, Canada, 1990 to 2017
Data for Figure 1 Note: This indicator reports air pollutant emissions from human activities only. It does not include emissions from natural sources such as forest fires and from vegetation. Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2019) Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory.
Between 1990 and 2017, the largest emission reductions were observed for SOX, which decreased by 69%. It was followed by CO emissions (54% reduction), VOCs (40%), NOX (26%) and PM2.5 (15%). These reductions since 1990 are due in part to government actions and voluntary initiatives from key industrial emitters that were put in place to restrict or eliminate the release of air pollutants in Canada.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-45 Air Quality
In 2017, the majority of emissions of the 6 key air pollutants in Canada came from ore and mineral industries, transportation, the oil and gas industry, agriculture, and dust and fires (for example, road dust, prescribed burning).
Figure 2. Distribution of air pollutant emissions by source, Canada, 2017
Data for Figure 2 Note: The indicator reports air pollutant emissions from human activities only. It does not include emissions from natural sources such as forest fires and from vegetation. Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2019) Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory. The human made sources most contributing to Canada's air pollutant emissions in 2017 were the following: the ore and mineral industries, electric utilities and the oil and gas industries together represented the majority of SOX emissions transportation (road, rail, air and marine) was the main source of NOX and CO emissions off-road vehicles and mobile equipment and home firewood burning were also important sources of CO emissions and the oil and gas industry was an important source of NOX emissions most of the VOC emissions came from the oil and gas industry and from the use of paints and solvents agriculture (livestock, crop production and fertilizer) accounted for the majority of NH3 emissions dust and fires were the most important sources of PM2.5 emissions
E-46 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Air Quality
At the provincial level, emissions of the 6 key air pollutants in 2017 were: 2020 Up-Date Environmental
the highest in Alberta for SOX, (25% of national emissions), NOX (36%), VOCs (31%), NH3 (27%) and PM2.5 (35%) the highest in Quebec for CO (28%) the second highest in Ontario for SOX (19% of national emissions), NOX (17%), VOCs (20%) and CO (25%) also important in Saskatchewan for NH3 and PM2.5, accounting for 22% and 21% of the national emissions of these pollutants
Figure 3. Distribution of air pollutant emissions by province and territory, Canada, 2017
Data for Figure 3 Note: The indicator reports air pollutant emissions from human activities only. It does not include emissions from natural sources such as forest fires and from vegetation. Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2019) Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2019. Reprinted with permission. This and other Environmental Indicators can be found at no cost online at https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-indicators.html.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-47 Air Quality
Canada's Fourth Biennial Report on Climate Change
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Canada is pleased to present its Fourth Biennial emissions across the economy, adaptation and climate Report to the United Nations Framework resilience, and clean technology, innovation, and jobs. Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It includes more than fifty concrete actions that cover all sectors of the Canadian economy, and puts Canada Since Canada’s last National Communication and on a path towards meeting our Paris Agreement 1 Biennial Report , Canada has continued to implement GHG emissions reduction target of 30% below 2005 its national climate change plan, the Pan-Canadian levels by 2030. Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change (the Pan-Canadian Framework), and work towards Canada’s most recent GHG emissions projections reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across the estimate that Canada’s GHG emissions in 2030 will economy. Canada welcomes this opportunity to be 227 million tonnes lower than projected prior to highlight its international emission reduction targets, the Pan-Canadian Framework or 19% below 2005 as well as ongoing mitigation efforts, emissions trends levels. This improvement, equivalent to approximately and projections, and international climate finance a third of Canada’s emissions in 2005, is widespread contributions. across all economic sectors, reflecting the breadth and the depth of the Pan-Canadian Framework. The Pan-Canadian Framework was adopted on December 9, 2016 as Canada’s plan to take ambitious Building on the success of the Pan-Canadian action to fight climate change, build resilience to a Framework, Canada’s federal government announced changing climate, and drive clean economic growth. It in December of 2019 that it will set a target to achieve is the first climate change plan in Canada’s history to net-zero emissions by 2050. This will include setting include joint and individual commitments by federal, legally-binding, five-year emissions-reduction provincial and territorial levels of government, and to milestones based on advice of experts and have been developed with input from Indigenous consultations with Canadians. This ambitious goal Peoples, businesses, non-governmental organizations, will be supported by a continued commitment to and Canadians from across the country. The Pan- ensuring a price on carbon pollution is in place Canadian Framework is built on four pillars: pricing everywhere in Canada, as well as prioritization of carbon pollution, complementary actions to reduce measures including green buildings and communities,
1 Canada’s Seventh National Communication and Third Biennial report, December 2017
1
E-48 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Air Quality support for zero-emission vehicles, clean electricity, example, federal, and some provincial, governments niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental clean technology, and nature-based climate solutions. pursued measures to increase the number of zero- This includes a specific commitment to planting emission vehicles on the road, including expanding 2 billion trees in the coming years. Canada is charging infrastructure and introducing purchase determined to meet and exceed its Paris incentives. Additionally, with a view to identifying Agreement target. further mitigation opportunities in the building and transportation sectors, the federal government struck Since Canada’s climate plan was adopted, the the Advisory Council on Climate Action, which Government of Canada has continued to provide published its final report in May 2019. Also in 2019, national leadership and to partner with provincial and the Task Force on Just Transition for Canadian Coal territorial governments, and to work with municipal Power Workers and Communities provided governments, as well as Indigenous Peoples, recommendations to support the transition of coal businesses, civil society, and Canadians to address workers and communities affected by the move from climate change both domestically and internationally coal-fired to cleaner electricity. to make the transition towards a clean economy. Work has also been advanced to reduce emissions in This report provides an update of key actions that the oil and gas sector, Canada’s largest source of Canada has taken to drive down GHGs and achieve emissions. New federal regulations to reduce methane its 2020 and 2030 mitigation targets since Canada’s emissions will enter into force on January 1, 2020. A last National Communication and Biennial Report, number of provinces have also been working to published at the end of 2017. reduce emissions from this sector though new For example, Canada now has a price on carbon technologies and standards. pollution across the country. In 2018, the Greenhouse At the same time, investments continued to support Gas Pollution Pricing Act was passed. Carbon pollution the development of clean technology, which will pricing systems are now in place in all provinces and complement and help achieve the reductions targeted territories across Canada (either provincial/territorial by various mitigation measures in addition to bringing systems or the federal system). Canadian technologies to expanding global markets In addition, federal, provincial, and territorial and equipping Canada’s workforce with the governments continued to make progress on knowledge and skills to succeed. implementing a host of complementary actions to In 2015, in support of the Paris Agreement, Canada reduce GHG emissions. This includes significant pledged $2.65 billion over five years in climate finance developments in the electricity sector, with new to pursue ambitious action on climate change in federal regulations to phase-out coal-fired electricity developing countries. Canada is delivering on its by 2030. These regulations will not only lower GHG commitment by implementing concrete initiatives emissions, but will also contribute to improved health through various multilateral and bilateral partners. outcomes for Canadians and ecosystems through Through its climate finance, Canada also helps to improved air quality. In the industrial sector, empower women and girls through climate action and regulations to phase down the consumption of mobilizes private-sector capital to address climate hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) entered into force. These change. regulations aim to reduce the supply of HFCs that enter Canada and the demand for HFCs in manufactured products, thereby averting future HFC releases to the environment.
Governments also made significant investments to increase renewable energy capacity; expand green, resilient infrastructure; support zero or low-emitting transportation; and harness mitigation opportunities within the agriculture, forestry, and waste sectors. For
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-49 Air Quality 2.0 CANADA’S GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND TRENDS
Canada’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory is developed using methodologies consistent with the prepared and submitted to the UNFCCC by April 15 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s of each year, in accordance with the revised Guidelines (IPCC) 2006 Guidelines for the preparation of for the preparation of national communications by National GHG Inventories. In line with the principle Parties included in Annex I to the Convention, Part I: of continuous improvement, the underlying data and UNFCCC reporting guidelines on annual inventories methodologies for estimating emissions are revised (UNFCCC Reporting Guidelines), adopted through over time; hence, total emissions in all years are Decision 24/CP.19 in 2013. The annual inventory subject to change as both data and methods are submission consists of the National Inventory Report improved. and the Common Reporting Format tables. Over the 2005-2017 period, total emissions decreased The GHG inventory includes emissions of carbon by 15 Mt or 2% (Figure 2.1). The Energy Sector
dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), dominated this trend, with emission decreases of 15 perfluorocarbons (PFCs), hydrofluorocarbons Mt (4%) in Stationary Combustion Sources and 5 Mt
(HFCs), sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) and nitrogen (9%) in Fugitive Sources. Over the same period,
trifluoride (NF3) in the following five sectors: Energy; emissions also decreased by 1.8 Mt (3%) in the IPPU Industrial Processes and Product Use (IPPU); Sector and 1.4 Mt (7%) in the Waste Sector. However, Agriculture; Waste; and Land Use, Land-Use Change emissions from Transport increased by 9.0 Mt (5%) and Forestry (LULUCF). The GHG emission and partially offsetting the decreases from the other sectors. removal estimates contained in Canada’s GHG inventory are
800
Waste 700 Agriculture
IPPU 600 Energy (Fugitive Sources) 500
Energy (Transport) eq) ² 400
300
200 Energy
GHG Emissions (Mt CO (Stationary Combustion) 100
0
LULUCF
-100 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Year
Figure 2.1: Trends in Canadian GHG Emissions by IPCC Sector (2005–2017) Source: National Inventory Report 1990-2017 – Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada
E-50 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Air Quality
2.1 Canadian Economic Sectors emissions estimates. In addition, Canadian economic sectors presented in Canada’s GHG Inventory are 2020 Up-Date Environmental For the purposes of analyzing economic trends and used to project Canada’s future GHG estimates. policies, it is useful to allocate emissions to the economic sector from which the emissions originate. GHG emissions trends in Canada’s economic sectors In general, a comprehensive emission profile for a from 2005 to 2017 are consistent with those described specific economic sector is developed by reallocating for IPCC sectors, with the Oil and Gas and the relevant proportion of emissions from various Transportation economic sectors showing emission IPCC subcategories. This reallocation simply increases of 37 Mt (23%) and 12 Mt (7%) respectively recategorizes emissions under different headings and since 2005 (Figure 2.2). These increases have been does not change the overall magnitude of Canadian more than offset by emission decreases in Electricity (45 Mt or 38%), Heavy Industry (14 Mt or 16%) and Waste & Others (4 Mt or 9%).
800 Coal Production Waste 700 Light Manufacturing, Construction & Forest Resources
600 Agriculture Heavy Industry
500 Electricity eq) ² 400 Buildings
300 Transportation
200 GHG Emissions (Mt CO
100 Oil & Gas
0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Year
Figure 2. 2: Trends in Canadian GHG Emissions by Economic Sector, excluding LULUCF (2005–2017) Source: National Inventory Report 1990-2017 – Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-51 Air Quality
2.2 National Inventory Arrangements Submission of information regarding the national inventory arrangements, including details on Environment and Climate Change Canada is the institutional arrangements for inventory preparation, single national entity with responsibility for preparing is also an annual requirement under the UNFCCC and submitting the National GHG Inventory to the reporting guidelines on annual inventories (see UNFCCC and for managing the supporting processes Chapter 1, Section 1.2 of Canada’s 2019 National and procedures. Inventory Report).
The institutional arrangements for the preparation of More information on Canada’s GHG Inventory is the inventory include formal agreements on data available at www.canada.ca/ghg-inventory. collection and estimate development; a quality management plan, including an improvement plan; the ability to identify key categories and generate quantitative uncertainty analysis; a process for performing recalculations due to improvements; procedures for official approval; and a working archive system to facilitate third-party review.
Canada’s inventory arrangements have not changed since the submission of its Third Biennial Report.
E-52 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Air Quality
3.0 ECONOMY-WIDE EMISSION 2020 Up-Date Environmental REDUCTION TARGET
3.1 Canada’s Emissions Table 3.2: Gases and Sectors Covered Reduction Targets Gases IPCC Sectors Economic Sectors CO2 Energy Oil and Gas Under the 2015 Paris Agreement, Canada has CH4 Transportation Electricity committed to reduce its GHG emissions by 30% N2O Industrial Processes Transportation below 2005 levels by 2030. Under the 2009 HFCs Agriculture Heavy Industry Copenhagen Accord, Canada committed to reduce PFCs Waste Buildings its emissions by 17% below 2005 levels by 2020 (Table 3.1). SF6 LULUCF* Agriculture NF3 Waste and Others Table 3.1: Canada’s emission LULUCF* reduction targets *LULUCF=Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. Target Base % Mt target Established year year reduction 3.2 Approach to the Land Use, Land- Copenhagen 2020 2005 17% 606 Accord Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) Paris Sector 2030 2005 30% 511 Agreement Canada’s Nationally Determined Contribution Canada’s GHG emission reduction targets are (NDC), submitted in May 2017, noted that Canada economy-wide, covering all sectors and gases. Global was examining its approach to accounting in the warming potential values for all covered gases are LULUCF sector towards its 2030 emission reduction those established in the IPCC 4th Assessment Report. target. It also indicated that Canada would exclude the In addition to reporting information by IPCC sector, impacts of natural disturbances and use a production Canada also reports information on historical and approach to accounting for harvested wood products. projected emissions according to the following This approach applies to Canada’s 2020 emission economic sector categories: electricity, transportation, reduction target as well. Canada’s Third Biennial oil and gas, heavy industry, buildings, agriculture, and Report, submitted in December 2017, noted that waste and others (Table 3.2). This sectoral work was continuing to develop LULUCF estimates categorization allows for a better understanding of that focus on anthropogenic emissions and removals emissions as they relate to economic trends and as a basis for improved reporting and accounting for policies in Canada, and is developed by reallocating LULUCF. the relevant proportion of emissions from various IPCC subcategories. Canada has since completed its analysis of the LULUCF sector and established accounting Additional information on the IPCC and economic approaches for each of the LULUCF sub-sectors. For sector definitions, as well as a detailed cross-walk almost all sub-sectors, the accounting approach between IPCC and Canadian economic sector compares net emissions in a given year with net categories can be found in Table A10-3 of Part 3 of emissions in the base year (often referred to as a Canada’s 2019 National Inventory Report submission “net-net” approach). Given the unique characteristics to the UNFCCC. of forests, which are significantly impacted by the effects of past management and natural disturbances,
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-53 Air Quality
Canada uses a reference level approach for forest land acquired through international-emissions trading are remaining forest land and the associated harvested counted towards Canada’s international targets. This wood products. For detailed information on Canada’s will take into account the applicable guidance under approach to LULUCF, please refer to Annex 2.6. the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement as well as other relevant input and programs (e.g., the 3.3 Approach to Market-based International Civil Aviation Organization’s Carbon Mechanisms Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA)). Canada is committed to working with Parties under The province of Québec remains a participant in the the Paris Agreement to establish robust Article 6 Western Climate Initiative (WCI) along with the guidance that ensures environmental integrity and State of California. The WCI is working to finalize rigorous accounting rules that result in real its approach to accounting for emission reduction reductions, in order to foster credible and efficient flows between jurisdictions under its shared cap-and- international carbon markets. trade program. Canada’s NDC, submitted in May 2017, noted that Canada would explore the use of internationally transferred mitigation outcomes (ITMOs) in the overall effort to achieve its 2030 NDC target, subject to the establishment of robust systems that deliver real and verified emissions reductions. As identified in the 3rd Biennial Report, Canada continues to examine its approach to the use of ITMOs, and Canada’s federal government will continue to work with interested provinces and territories, as well as with international partners, to ensure that allowances
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2019. Reprinted with permission. The full report can be accessed at no cost by visiting https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/greenhouse-gas-emissions/fourth-biennial-report-cli- mate-change.html.
E-54 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Air Quality niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental The road ahead is electric Zero-emission vehicles have grown in popularity. See how this market is gaining traction in Canada!
2.2% 3.8% Share of zero-emission vehicles in 97% new vehicle registrations in 2018. Share of zero-emission vehicles in of zero-emission new vehicle vehicles have been registrations registered in just in Quebec three provinces in 2018. Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia.
Note: C Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1. Zero-emission vehicles are battery-electric vehicles (BEV) or plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) as represented by the Minister of Industry, 2019 that have the potential to produce no tailpipe emissions. ISBN: 978-0-660-33209-3 Source: New Motor Vehicle Registrations, 2011-2018. Catalogue number: 11-627-M
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-55
Waste 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Solid waste diversion and disposal
Most garbage collected for disposal ends up in landfills and a small amount is incinerated. This can lead to air emissions, land disturbance or water pollution. The extraction and processing of new resources needed to replace those discarded as waste leads to more pollution. Diverting waste by recycling and composting can help reduce the impact of solid waste on the environment.1 Key results From 2002 to 2016, the total amount of solid waste2 collected in Canada increased by 3.5 million tonnes (or 11%) o The amount of waste disposed in landfills or incinerated increased by 0.9 million tonnes (or 4%) to reach 24.9 million tonnes in 2016 o The amount of waste diverted grew by 2.6 million tonnes (or 39%) to reach 9.3 million tonnes in 2016 In 2016, the non-residential sector was responsible for 59% of disposed waste and 48% of diverted waste
Figure 1. Solid waste diversion and disposal, Canada, 2002 to 2016
Data for Figure 1 Source: Statistics Canada (2018) Table 38-10-0032-01. Disposal of waste, by source. Statistics Canada (2018) Table 38-10-0033-01. Materials diverted, by source.
1 For more information see Municipal solid waste management. 2 For more details about what constitutes solid waste in the context of this indicator, please refer to the Data sources and methods.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-57 Waste
Solid waste refers to recyclables, organic materials and garbage generated by homes, businesses and institutions. In 2016, 27% of solid waste was diverted from disposal, up from 22% in 2002. The share of waste being diverted from residential sources increased from 25% to 32% The share of waste being diverted from non-residential sources increased from 20% to 23%
Figure 2. Solid waste diversion rate by source, Canada, 2002 to 2016
Data for Figure 2 Source: Statistics Canada (2018) Table 38-10-0032-01. Disposal of waste, by source. Statistics Canada (2018) Table 38-10-0033-01. Materials diverted, by source. Between 2002 and 2016, solid waste disposal from residential sources grew by 1.8 million tonnes, while the waste diverted increased by 2 million tonnes. Disposal from non-residential sources shrank by 0.9 million tonnes over the same period, while diversion increased by 0.6 million tonnes.
E-58 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Waste
Solid waste per person 2020 Up-Date Environmental Key results Total solid waste disposal per person has decreased from 768 to 688 kilograms between 2002 and 2016 Diversion of waste per person has increased over the same period from 212 to 255 kilograms, an increase of about 20%
Figure 3. Solid waste diversion and disposal per person, Canada, 2002 to 2016
Data for Figure 3 Source: Statistics Canada (2018) Table 38-10-0032-01. Disposal of waste, by source. Statistics Canada (2018) Table 38-10-0033-01. Materials diverted, by source. From 2002 to 2016, waste disposal per person from residential sources increased from 269 to 282 kilograms while disposal per person from non-residential sources declined from 499 to 406 kilograms. Waste diversion per person from residential sources increased steadily between 2002 and 2014, but dropped in 2016. Waste diversion per person from non-residential sources went up and down over the period.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-59 Waste
Solid waste diversion by type of material Key results Between 2002 and 2016, solid waste diversion increased by 39% to 9.3 million tonnes In 2016, paper and organic materials accounted for 67% of total solid waste diverted (3.6 and 2.6 million tonnes, respectively)
Figure 4. Solid waste diversion by type of material, Canada, 2002 to 2016
Data for Figure 4 Note: Other materials include electronics, tires and other unclassified materials. Source: Statistics Canada (2018) Table 38-10-0034-01. Materials diverted, by type. Diversion of plastics almost tripled between 2002 and 2016 but remains extremely small at less than 5% of all solid waste diversion. Organic materials diversion doubled to reach 28% of diverted material, second to paper. Diversion of metals and construction, renovation and demolition materials are the only types of materials that saw a decline during this period.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2019. Reprinted with permission. This and other Environmental Indicators can be found at no cost online at https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-indicators.html.
E-60 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Waste
Guide for Identifying, Evaluating and Selecting Policies for Influencing niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental Construction, Renovation and Demolition Waste Management
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Construction, renovation and demolition (CRD) wastes make up one of the largest solid waste streams in Canada. This waste comes at a significant cost: it is expensive to manage, poses risks to human health and the environment, and represents a missed opportunity to recover value from discarded materials. Consequently, there are strong social, economic and ecological imperatives to both reduce the rate of CRD waste generation and increase the quantities diverted from disposal. This guide provides decision-makers with high-level guidance for identifying, evaluating and selecting effective policies for influencing CRD waste management. This includes reducing the amount of waste generated by CRD activities, decreasing the amount of CRD waste that is disposed, lessening the environmental impacts of the CRD waste that is disposed, and strengthening the markets for, and value of, diverted CRD materials.
Key Steps in CRD Waste Policy Development Reducing the amount of CRD waste heading to landfill is a complicated task, and there is no single policy that can address the issue on its own. CRD waste reduction and diversion requires a comprehensive approach. Successful jurisdictions use a combination of policies that are tailored to their unique regional political, economic and market conditions. Policymakers can leverage a three-step process for evaluating CRD waste management policies: 1. Assess: The starting point is to assess the regional context to determine the current state of CRD waste management and identify the materials and systems with the greatest potential for reduction or diversion. 2. Prioritize: The second step is to establish a set of goals and select a short list of strategies and policy measures that are most closely aligned with the regional priorities, needs and context. This may include setting diversion targets and identifying priority materials, construction life-cycle stages and actors for action. 3. Evaluate: The final step is to assess the potential benefits and impacts of each policy and decide on a path forward.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-61 Waste
CRD Waste management policy evaluation process
Overview of Construction, Renovation and Demolition Waste in Canada Although CRD wastes may consist of similar materials, the quantities and waste stream composition may vary significantly depending on the region and the time of year, and this has significant implications for waste management. Guy Perry and Associates and Keller Environmental (2015) divide CRD waste into three streams: x Construction waste refers to wastes that are derived from the process of building new structures, excluding large civil and public infrastructure projects (dams, bridges, etc.), marine pilings, telephone, rail, land clearing and so on. x Renovation waste is generally a hybrid of construction waste and demolition waste and is derived from undertaking improvements and repairs to existing structures, excluding large civil and public infrastructure projects (dams, bridges, etc.), marine pilings, telephone, rail, land clearing and so on. x Demolition waste refers to wastes and material debris that are derived from the process of demolishing existing structures. Demolition activities tend to produce mixed waste that is challenging to separate into different materials for reuse or recycling. CRD waste is made up of many different types of materials and products. The most prevalent materials by weight are wood (clean, engineered, treated and painted), asphalt roofing and drywall. Other materials include metals, plastics, concrete, asphalt paving, bricks, glass, cardboard, and a host of other materials found in relatively small quantities such as ceiling tiles, equipment, furniture and paint.
E-62 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Waste
Waste diversion is the process of diverting waste from landfills or incinerators through various niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental means such as reuse, recycling, composting or gas production through anaerobic digestion. From a diversion perspective, CRD waste materials are categorized by ease of diversion as high value, simple to divert, complex to divert and limited options.
Categories of construction, renovation and demolition waste materials organized by ease of diversion
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-63 Waste
Policy Options for Construction, Renovation and Demolition Waste Reduction and Diversion This guide presents six broad strategies and 14 policies that can influence CRD waste management. These strategies and associated policies are not presented in any order of priority, effectiveness or preference.
Strategy Associated CRD waste management policies A. Create accountability Make specific actors (e.g., producers, builders, facilities) more for waste diversion accountable for reducing and diverting CRD waste. Policies: 1. Waste management plans and processes for facilities and projects 2. Producer responsibility programs B. Limit disposal options Limit where, how or what materials can be disposed of. Policies: 3. Waste disposal bans, limits and surcharges 4. Transportation requirements and restrictions C. Align financial Use levies, fees and charges to encourage waste reduction and diversion. incentives Policies: 5. Disposal fees and levies 6. Virgin material levies D. Improve CRD Increase the resource efficiency of CRD activities. Policies: processes 7. Building codes and requirements 8. Green building certification 9. Environmental product standards and labels 10. Deconstruction standards E. Strengthen diversion Increase the supply and demand of diverted materials by designing out markets and waste and requiring proper end-of-life management when purchasing infrastructure products and waste services. Policies: 11. Support infrastructure and market development 12. Public procurement F. Build knowledge and Increase the capacity and knowledge of key stakeholders and establish establish systems whereby progress can be tracked over time. Policies: accountability 13. Industry outreach, education and resources measures 14. Benchmark and track data
Managing Common Construction, Renovation and Demolition Waste Materials The most common CRD waste materials in most regions of Canada are wood (clean, engineered, painted, treated), asphalt roofing and drywall. The table below outlines some of the policy approaches that may be evaluated to reduce and divert these materials.
Waste material Overview Policies 1. Clean wood Clean wood (also known as white wood) is not treated with x CRD waste bans, waste chemicals (e.g., for pressure treatment), paint or other limits and coatings. It includes solid wood, lumber, and pallets that surcharges are unpainted, unstained, untreated and free of glue. x Deconstruction standards Although there are many uses for clean wood waste, the x Strengthened challenge can sometimes be in creating functional and infrastructure and
E-64 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Waste
Waste material Overview Policies niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental economically sustainable markets given the variability and markets seasonality of supply. The presence and maturity of markets for clean wood waste varies across the country.
Addressing the large amounts of clean wood waste that are generated from new construction, renovation and demolition requires a change in business approach. Currently, large volumes of CRD wood waste cannot be diverted because it is commingled with other materials and contaminants or is in such poor condition that the cost of processing and cleaning limits the economic viability of processing and reusing the material. 2. Engineered Engineered (composite) wood refers to manufactured x CRD waste wood waste plywood, particleboard, medium-density fibreboard (MDF), disposal bans and oriented strand board (OSB), veneers, glulam beams, and surcharges so on, which may include nails, metal plates, glues and x Deconstruction other chemicals. Significant quantities are generated from standards new construction, renovation and demolition. x Strengthened infrastructure and The markets for engineered wood are mostly similar to markets clean wood. As the diversion process and end-user markets for engineered wood are similar to clean wood, the policy goals and priorities are also similar. Therefore, the policy approaches provided for clean wood waste above may also be applied to engineered wood.
3. Painted wood Painted wood contains a coating (e.g., paint, varnish, x Transportation waste sealer, stain) applied onto or impregnated into clean, requirements and engineered or treated wood. It includes trim, doors, restrictions cabinets, flooring, some siding, balustrades and x Investment in baseboards. research to develop new Market options depend on the coating. Some painted wood processing may contain hazardous or toxic substances and, because technologies and it may be difficult to test the type of paint, it is usually not infrastructure possible to divert from landfill. Painted wood recycling and reuse markets also depend on the wood substrate (i.e., clean, engineered, treated).
Because painted wood is so difficult to divert, alternative upstream solutions may be considered to reduce the volumes of waste generated. 4. Treated wood Treated wood refers to wood that is pressure treated or x Disposal fees and waste coated with wood preservatives to protect it against decay, levies mould and insects. It includes fencing and wood for x Producer exterior applications, marine pilings, railway ties, and responsibility products that have been treated with stains or preservatives.
In most regions, although the composition of treated wood is different than for painted wood, the policy goals and
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-65 Waste
Waste material Overview Policies priorities are similar. Paints, coatings and preservatives can all contain chemicals that may need to be handled carefully and disposed of safely. Therefore, similar to painted wood waste, options for diverting treated wood waste from landfill are extremely limited. 5. Asphalt Roofing shingles and asphalt sheeting are made from x Requirements for roofing waste fibreglass or organic backing, asphalt cement, sand-like waste aggregate and mineral fillers (Crushcrete, 2017). management plans Many provinces have an excellent record on reusing x Investment in asphalt paving in road construction. However, due to infrastructure in processing standards, asphalt from building-related CRD combination with waste typically has a lower recovery rate and is often differential tipping rejected as unclean because it can be contaminated with fees other products and some may contain asbestos. x Transportation requirements and Although processing asphalt shingles is more complex restrictions than for some other materials, it can be economically x CRD waste viable. Technology exists to recycle 100 per cent of disposal bans, asphalt shingles for sale as an additive for paving or kiln limits and fuel. Processing facilities for asphalt roofing exist in most surcharges major urban centres, but recycling can be challenging in other parts of the country due to lack of infrastructure.
Given that effective recycling technologies exist, the primary policy goal when dealing with asphalt roofing waste is to limit disposal options (e.g., via transportation requirements and restrictions, waste disposal bans) and enable diversion (by providing access to processing facilities) and then ensuring that facilities are operating state-of-the art equipment. 6. Drywall Also called gypsum, plasterboard, sheetrock, Gyproc and x CRD waste waste wallboard, drywall waste comprises gypsum (94 per cent) disposal bans, and paper backing (6 per cent) and may contain screws limits and and fasteners (metal content of drywall amounts to less surcharges than 1 per cent of the total). x Investment in infrastructure in Where recycling facilities exist, drywall is a straightforward combination with product to deal with. Clean waste drywall that is commonly differential tipping accepted by processing facilities comprises board material, fees non-hazardous strip-out plasterboard products, plaster blocks and construction off-cuts.
Challenges to drywall recycling are primarily related to the potential for contamination. By far, the largest volumes of drywall come from demolition, but markets for demolition drywall can be very selective. In particular, the challenges of asbestos-containing drywall products are significant because the identification of and recycling of asbestos- containing drywall is not straightforward.
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. “Guide for Identifying, Evaluating and Selecting Policies for influencing Construction, Renovation and Demolition Waste Management (PN 1597),” Executive Summary, p. ii-vii. Reprinted with permission, 2020. Please visit www.ccme.ca for more.
E-66 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Water Quality & Quantity 2020 Up-Date Environmental
A look at Canada’s freshwater FRESHWATER IN CANADA resources from 1971 to 2013
The following map shows the depth of renewable freshwater resources (mm) for each of Canada’s 25 drainage regions. DID YOU KNOW?
Canada produced That’s more than The Pacific Coastal 3 region produced on 3,478 km twice the volume average 1,500 mm of Lake Ontario of freshwater. of renewable freshwater per year. ͊
This volume represents on average On 3 104,0001 average, m for every single CanadianCanada .produced
The Maritime Coastal and Freshwater production Renewable freshwater production was lowest in Newfoundland–Labrador Low High the Prairies—50 mm on average for the Missouri, regions produced 850 mm of Assiniboine–Red, North Saskatchewan and freshwater, the second highest South Saskatchewan regions. in Canada. WATER USE QUICK FACTS
These drainage regions had the highest Each Canadian used on surface water withdrawals in Canada: average 250 litres of water per day in 2013. Canada Great Lakes Total household St. Lawrence 3 Canadians used 37.9 km3 of water use was 3.2 km . water for economic and South Saskatchewan That’s over 1.2 million household activities in 2013. Olympic swimming pools ͊ cubic kilometres
Statistics Canada, 2017, “Freshwater in Canada,” Human Activity and the Environment, Catalogue no. 16-201-X.
Land and freshwater area, by province and territory Total area Land Freshwater % of total area km² Canada 9,984,670 9,093,507 891,163 100 Newfoundland and Labrador 405,212 373,872 31,340 4.1 Prince Edward Island 5,660 5,660 0 0.1 Nova Scotia 55,284 53,338 1,946 0.6 New Brunswick 72,908 71,450 1,458 0.7 Quebec 1,542,056 1,365,128 176,928 15.4 Ontario 1,076,395 917,741 158,654 10.8 Manitoba 647,797 553,556 94,241 6.5 Saskatchewan 651,036 591,670 59,366 6.5 Alberta 661,848 642,317 19,531 6.6 British Columbia 944,735 925,186 19,549 9.5 Yukon 482,443 474,391 8,052 4.8 Northwest Territories 1,346,106 1,183,085 163,021 13.5 Nunavut 2,093,190 1,936,113 157,077 21 Source: Natural Resources Canada, GeoAccess Division. Last modified: 2005-02-01.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-67 Water Quality & Quantity
Water quality in Canadian rivers
Healthy river ecosystems rely on clean water. The quality of water, and the health of rivers, depends on how people develop and use the surrounding land. These indicators measure the ability of river water to support plants and animals. Key results x For the 2016 to 2018 period, water quality in rivers in Canada was rated fair to excellent at 80% of the monitored sites x Land development through agriculture, mining, forestry, high population density or a combination of these (mixed pressures) tends to have a negative impact on water quality
Figure 1. Water quality in Canadian rivers, national and by land use category, 2016 to 2018 period
Data for Figure 1 Note: Water quality was evaluated at 174 sites across southern Canada using the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment's water quality index. For more information on land use classification and monitoring sites selection, consult the Data sources and methods section. Source: Data assembled by Environment and Climate Change Canada from federal, provincial and joint water quality monitoring programs. Population, forestry, mining and land cover statistics for each site's drainage area were provided by Statistics Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, the Government of Alberta and the University of Maryland. For the 2016 to 2018 period, water quality at 174 monitoring sites in southern Canadian rivers1 was rated: x excellent or good at 40% of monitoring sites x fair at 40% of sites x marginal at 17% of sites x poor at 2% of sites By world standards, Canada has abundant, clean freshwater resources. The water in Canada's rivers varies naturally across the country based on the rocks and soil in the area and the climate. For example, water that flows through the rocky landscape of northern Ontario and Quebec is naturally different from water flowing through the deep soils of the Prairies. However, it is how people have developed the land around lakes and rivers that has the largest impact on water quality at each site.
1 The indicators focus on the regions in Canada where human activity is more prevalent, as it is usually the main factor for water quality deterioration. Monitoring sites were selected based on whether there was data available for a sufficient number of years and whether the sites were representative of the drainage region. Northern Canada is underrepresented; this is due partly to the challenges related to sampling in these remote locations. For more information on site selection, please see the Data sources and methods section.
E-68 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Water Quality & Quantity niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental Water quality is generally good or excellent in undeveloped areas where native plants, trees and soils purify the water before it reaches the river. Adding development such as manufacturing and cities puts pressure on the landscape and increases the amount of chemicals being released into rivers every day. As well, many contaminants make their way into rivers after being released into the air through burning. Fertilizers and pesticides used to help crops grow and manure from livestock can wash into nearby rivers or seep into groundwater, impacting water quality in these areas. Some forestry activities, such as removing trees and other vegetation that would otherwise reduce the flow of surface water into rivers, may increase run-off of nutrients and contaminants into rivers. All of these developments change water quality in a river and put pressure on the plants and animals that live there. Trends in water quality in Canadian rivers Key results x Water quality has not changed between 2002 and 2018 at a majority of sites across southern Canada x Where it has changed, it has improved more often than it has deteriorated
Figure 2. Trends in water quality, Canada, 2002 to 2018
Data for Figure 2 Note: The trend in water quality between the first year that data were reported for each site and 2018 was calculated at 174 sites across southern Canada. A Mann-Kendall test was used to assess whether there was a statistically-significant increasing or decreasing trend in the annual guideline deviation ratios at a site. The trend was calculated at each site using parameters specific to the site. Therefore, an improving or a deteriorating water quality does not necessarily imply a change in water quality category. For more information on the trend, consult the Data sources and methods section. Source: Data assembled by Environment and Climate Change Canada from federal, provincial and joint water quality monitoring programs. The average water quality in a river tends to change slowly. Natural factors, such as snow and rainfall, affect water quality by washing pollution that builds up on the surface of roads and fields into the river. A dry year could mean better water quality, because less pollution is washed into the river. On the other hand, a drought could lead to worse quality as there is less water to dilute pollution from point sources like urban sewage outflows. A changing climate that results in longer or more frequent wet or dry periods will affect water quality depending on the region. How the landscape is developed also impacts how quickly water quality changes. Altered landscapes, industrial and sewage effluents, and atmospheric deposition2 can all affect water quality. Water quality in a river can be improved by modernizing wastewater treatment plants and factories, adopting environmental farming practices, or planting native vegetation along river banks, among other actions.
2 Atmospheric deposition refers to the phenomenon through which pollutants, including gases and particles are deposited from the atmosphere in the form of dust or precipitation, ultimately entering fresh water systems.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-69 Water Quality & Quantity
Regional water quality in Canadian rivers Key results x The Atlantic Ocean, Mackenzie River and Hudson Bay regions had the highest proportion of sites with good or excellent water quality (58%, 50%, and 42% respectively) x The Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River, Pacific Ocean and Hudson Bay regions had the highest proportion of sites with marginal or poor water quality (26%, 24% and 18%, respectively) x Water quality at the majority of sites across Canada was rated fair
Figure 3. Regional water quality, Canada, 2016 to 2018 period
Data for Figure 3 Note: For the Regional water quality in Canadian rivers indicator, water quality was assessed at 193 sites across Canada using the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment's water quality index. Compared to the national indicator, the Regional water quality in Canadian rivers indicator uses 19 additional monitoring sites and includes more sites in the northern portions of the Mackenzie River and Pacific Ocean regions. Source: Data assembled by Environment and Climate Change Canada from federal, provincial, territorial and joint water quality monitoring programs. Water quality varies widely across Canada. For the 2016 to 2018 period: x The highest proportion of sites rated good or excellent was found in areas where there was very little human development upstream. The Atlantic Ocean and Mackenzie River regions have the highest proportion of undeveloped sites in Canada x The highest proportion of sites rated marginal or poor was found in areas where there was urban development or mining, combined with agriculture, forestry or a combination of all 4
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2019. Reprinted with permission. This and other Environmental Indicators can be found at no cost online at https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-indicators.html.
E-70 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Water Quality & Quantity niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental Water quantity in Canadian rivers
Canada is a water-rich country. However, too much or too little water can lead to serious problems. When there is too little water, there may not be enough water to irrigate farmland and there may be drought. When there is too much, rivers may flood. These indicators provide information about water flows across Canada. Key results From 2001 to 2017, most Canadian rivers had normal water quantity Since 2010, there has been an increase in sites with a higher-than-normal water quantity The percentage of stations with a lower-than-normal water quantity has declined since 2001
Figure 1. Water quantity at monitoring stations, Canada, 2001 to 2017
Data for Figure 1 Note: The water quantity classification for a station is based on a comparison of the most frequently observed flow condition in a given year with typical water quantity at that station between 1981 and 2010. Data from Northern Quebec are missing for 2016 and 2017 and from the Arctic Coast-Islands for 2017 because of delays in getting data into the database. The results for this indicator vary slightly from those in the Regional water quantity in Canadian rivers indicator because of differences in the methods used to calculate the indicators. For more information, please see Data sources and methods. Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2019) National Water Data Archive (HYDAT). In 2017, there were 766 water quantity monitoring stations located across 23 of Canada's 25 drainage regions.1 Overall, water quantity at 26% of the stations across Canada had a higher-than-normal water quantity, 6% had lower-than-normal quantity and 68% had normal quantity. Water quantity in Canadian rivers is measured as water flow, or the volume of water moving over a point, over a fixed period of time. Water flows in rivers generally follow changes in temperature, rainfall and snowfall throughout
1 A drainage region is a variant of the Standard Drainage Area Classification (SDAC) that defines Canada's land and interior freshwater lakes into 11 major drainage areas, 164 sub-drainage areas and 974 sub-sub-drainage areas. Each of the 25 drainage regions used in this indicator is a customized grouping based on the SDAC's sub-sub-drainage areas. Statistics Canada (2003) Standard Drainage Area Classification. Retrieved on September 23, 2019.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-71 Water Quality & Quantity
the year. More precipitation increases the amount of water in rivers, whereas warmer temperatures and less rainfall or snowfall will result in less water. Generally, water flows are highest right after the snow melts in the early spring and gradually dry up through the summer and fall. Over longer time scales, the amount of water in rivers is also affected by weather patterns and ocean surface temperatures which interact to influence the amount of rain or snow that falls. For example, extended summer droughts on the Prairies tend to take place when the southern Pacific Ocean warms during El Niño Southern Oscillation events. In an El Niño year, lower-than-normal water flows are generally seen on the Prairies. The Prairies experience more rain and snow when the ocean cools during La Niña events.2 When this happens, higher-than-normal flows are found in the Prairies. Climate change may increase the strength and occurrence of the El Niño Southern Oscillations.
2 Bonsal B and Shabbar A (2010) Large-scale climate oscillations influencing Canada, 1900-2008. Canadian Biodiversity: Ecosystem Status and Trends 2010, Technical Thematic Report No. 4. Retrieved on September 23, 2019.
E-72 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Water Quality & Quantity
Regional water quantity in Canadian rivers 2020 Up-Date Environmental Key results In 2017, at the drainage region level, water quantity conditions in 16 of the 23 drainage regions monitored were normal higher-than-normal water flows were observed in northern British Columbia, much of the Prairie provinces, northern Ontario and southern Quebec there were no drainage regions with lower-than-normal water quantity
Figure 2. Water quantity status of drainage regions, Canada, 2017
Data for Figure 2 Note: The 2017 water quantity classification for a drainage region is based on the category (low, normal, high) for the most downstream monitoring station in the drainage region with more than 30 years of data. The flows are for the Canadian portions of the drainage regions.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-73 Water Quality & Quantity
There are not enough data to describe the Arctic Coast-Islands (8) and Northern Quebec (18) drainage regions. The results for this indicator vary slightly from those in the National and Local water quantity in Canadian rivers indicators because it uses data for the most downstream site in the drainage region. For more information, please see Data sources and methods. Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2019) National Water Data Archive (HYDAT). To characterize water quantity at a regional level, monitoring stations for the most downstream site in the drainage region are used. In 2017, 324 of the 766 monitoring stations are included to analyse the water quantity level. Every year in Canada is marked by weather extremes and 2017 was no exception. These extreme events do not always translate into major changes in seasonal or long term water quantity. For example, British Columbia experienced record dry summer conditions3 but over the whole year water quantity in the province was mostly normal. By contrast, eastern Ontario and Quebec experienced record spring flooding and rain fall3 that did result in higher-than-normal water quantity over the year in those regions. Although lower-than-normal flows were observed in some monitoring stations in 2017, the flows did not represent a large enough percentage of the drainage region to result in a low water quantity classification for the region.
3 Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (2017) Canada's Top Ten Weather Stories for 2017. Retrieved on September 23, 2019.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2019. Reprinted with permission. This and other Environmental Indicators can be found at no cost online at https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-indicators.html.
E-74 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Water Quality & Quantity
Human Activity and the Environment 2016: Freshwater in Canada niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Highlights Human Activity and the Environment 2016: Freshwater in Canada provides up-to-date statistics on freshwater supply and demand and includes maps, charts and tables for each of Canada’s 25 drainage regions. The following bullets present selected highlights from the report: • Canada is rich in freshwater resources. It has the third largest renewable freshwater supply worldwide and the second largest amount per capita among developed countries, at 103,899 m3 per person. • The average annual water yield1 for Canada from 1971 to 2013 was 3,478 km3 or 0.349 m3/m2, equivalent to a depth of 349 mm across the extent of the country. • The annual water yield in southern Canada fluctuated over time, from a high of 1,544 km3 in 1974 to a low of 1,165 km3 in 1987. The water yield decreased from 1971 to 1987 and then began a gradual recovery to 2012, with a dip in the late 1990s to early 2000s. • The Pacific Coastal drainage region in British Columbia had the highest water yield per unit area in the country at 1.5 m3/m2. The lowest yields were found in the Missouri, Assiniboine–Red, South Saskatchewan and North Saskatchewan drainage regions in the Prairies, which had an average annual water yield per unit area of 0.05 m3/m2. • Water yield varies throughout the year, with the highest flows generally in spring and early summer. The median monthly water yield for southern Canada from 1971 to 2013 peaked at 218 km3 in May, but dropped to 76 km3 in August, with a low of 50 km3 in February. • Water yields in the Okanagan–Similkameen and the Assiniboine–Red drainage regions are the most heavily dominated by spring flows—in these areas the median water yields for April, May and June accounted for 75% and 77% respectively of the annual flows over the 1971 to 2013 period. In contrast, the peak median water yields occurred later in the year and declined more gradually in the South and North Saskatchewan drainage regions. • In 2013, monthly maximum turbidity values for surface water sources were highest in the Lower Saskatchewan–Nelson, North Saskatchewan and Assiniboine–Red drainage regions in the Prairies and in the St. Lawrence drainage region, while the lowest levels were seen in drainage regions in British Columbia and the Atlantic provinces. • In 2013, water withdrawals for economic and household activities totaled 37,892 million m3 (37.9 km3). Industry or households withdrew 87% of this water directly from rivers, lakes and groundwater, while the remainder was supplied by drinking water plants. Although some of this water was consumed—for example, lost to evaporation, transpiration or included in products—the majority was returned back to the environment after use. • The main water users in 2013 were electric power generation, transmission and distribution (68%); manufacturing (10%); households (9%); agriculture (5%) and mining and oil and gas extraction (3%). • Total household water use was 3,239 million m3 in 2013, down 16% compared to 3,875 million m3 in 2005, while on a per capita basis water use has dropped from approximately 330 L/person/day to 250 L/person/day. • Looking at water use from the final demand perspective, which attributes water use related to the production of goods and services to the end-user of that product rather than to the producer, households were responsible for 53% of total water use in 2013, followed by the production of goods and services for export at 30%. • Challenges in balancing water supplies to water demand tend to peak in late summer. The highest surface water intake to water yield ratios for August 2013 occurred in the Assiniboine–Red and in the Great Lakes drainage regions, followed by the South Saskatchewan and Okanagan–Similkameen. Higher intake to yield ratios point to a higher possibility for water shortages, conflicts between competing uses and the potential for insufficient instream flows for ecosystem requirements.
1 Water yield estimates are derived from data on the monthly volume of unregulated flows in Canada’s rivers and streams. Although the water yield provides an estimate of renewable freshwater, it can include some water that is considered non-renewable (e.g., melt water from receding glaciers). A more complete discussion of the methodology for estimating water yield is presented in Appendix D and in Statistics Canada, 2009, “The water yield for Canada as a thirty-year average (1971 to 2000): Concepts, methodology and initial results,” Environment Accounts and Statistics Analytical and Technical Paper Series, Catalogue no. 16-001-M, no.7, www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/16-001-m/16-001-m2009007-eng.htm.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-75 Water Quality & Quantity
Section 1: Introduction Canada’s natural environment produces an abundance of freshwater that sustains ecosystems and supplies many benefits to people. This freshwater provides vital supplies of drinking water, supports food and timber production, dilutes and carries our wastes, and allows for a myriad of other activities such as hydro-electric production, manufacturing, mining, transport and recreation. Water is also an integral part of aquatic ecosystems, providing habitat for fish and other organisms. The amount and quality of freshwater supplied to ecosystems varies from year to year, but also according to seasons and across the different regions of the country. This freshwater supply function can be altered and degraded by human activities—for example, climate and land cover change influence aspects of the water cycle (Textbox 1.1), while runoff and wastewater discharge from urban areas and from agriculture, forestry, mining and other activities will affect water quality. Human Activity and the Environment 2016: Freshwater in Canada provides up-to-date statistics on freshwater supply and demand and includes maps, charts and tables for each of Canada’s 25 drainage regions. It also provides data on some of the factors that influence the supply and quality of freshwater. The report relies on hydrometric data tracking streamflow, survey data on drinking water plants, industrial and agricultural water use, as well as data drawn from numerous other sources to characterize some of the pressures affecting the provision of freshwater. The report is organized as follows: Section 2: Freshwater supply and demand provides updated statistics on water yield, water quality and water use. Section 3: Drainage region profiles provides highlights, maps, tables and charts characterizing water supply, demand and various factors affecting the provision of freshwater for each of Canada’s 25 drainage regions. Appendices: include a glossary of water terminology, methodology information, equivalences and comprehensive data tables. The annual Human Activity and the Environment publications bring together data from many sources to present a statistical portrait of Canada’s environment, with special emphasis on human activity and its relationship to natural elements—air, water, soil, plants and animals. Each issue provides accessible and relevant information on an environmental issue of concern to Canadians.
Textbox 1.1 What you need to know about this study The hydrological cycle describes the continuous movement of water between the earth and the atmosphere (Figure 1.1). Water evaporates from surfaces, sublimates from snow or ice or is transpired by plants. The water vapour rises through the air, cools and condenses, forming clouds. When the water droplets in clouds combine and grow heavier, they fall to the earth as precipitation—rain, snow or hail. Water is also supplied to ecosystems as dew and fog. It is stored as snowpack and in glaciers, runs overland into streams, rivers and lakes, infiltrates into the soil where it becomes soil moisture, or travels downward through the soil to the water table, becoming groundwater. Groundwater flows slowly underground and is discharged back to surface water systems through wells, springs and seepage into streams, rivers, lakes and oceans. Groundwater can also be stored in aquifers for hundreds or even thousands of years.
E-76 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Water Quality & Quantity niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental 2 Figure 1.1 Hydrological cycle
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of the Environment Canada, 2013.
Most water is found in the oceans—freshwater makes up less than 3% of water on earth. This freshwater is found in glaciers, ice and snow, in streams, lakes, rivers and wetlands and as groundwater and soil moisture. Renewable freshwater refers to the water that regularly replenishes our rivers, lakes and aquifers. Non-renewable freshwater describes water that is stored in deep aquifers, ice caps and glaciers that have a negligible rate of recharge on a human time scale. Some freshwater in the Great Lakes and other major water bodies can also be considered non-renewable since the renewal rates are very low. The water yield is an estimate of renewable freshwater. It is derived from data on the unregulated flow of water in rivers and streams in Canada. Although the water yield provides an estimate of renewable freshwater, it can include some water that is considered non-renewable (e.g., melt water from receding glaciers). Where possible, data are aggregated and presented by drainage region, which groups 974 sub-sub-drainage areas representing all land and interior freshwater bodies into 25 drainage regions (Map 1.1).2 These drainage regions can be further grouped according to their outflow into one of five ocean drainage areas: the Pacific Ocean, Arctic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Hudson Bay or Atlantic Ocean. This geography is a variant of Statistics Canada’s official classification of drainage areas, the Standard Drainage Area Classification (SDAC) 2003 (www.statcan. gc.ca/eng/subjects/standard/sdac/sdac).
2 Spatial data files (ArcGIS®, file extension: .shp) for this map can be downloaded from the HTML version of the publication, www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/16-201-x/16-201-x2017000-eng.htm.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-77 Water Quality & Quantity
Map 1.1 Drainage regions of Canada
ARCTIC OCEAN
5
Whitehorse ! 8 !Iqaluit 7 !Yellowknife
16 1
Hudson 25 Bay 6 PACIFIC St. John's OCEAN 2 15 18 !Edmonton ! !Vancouver 10 14 ! ! 22 Victoria 4 Charlottetown 11 17 Regina 3 ! Québec Winnipeg ! Calgary 12 ! 24 ! ! 13 ! ATLANTIC 9 21 Halifax OCEAN 20 ! 23 ! Ottawa Fredericton Pacific Ocean Montréal Ocean drainage 19 ! Toronto 1 Pacific Coastal area boundary 2 Fraser–Lower Mainland 0250500km 3 Okanagan–Similkameen Hudson Bay 4 Columbia 5 Yukon 10 North Saskatchewan 11 South Saskatchewan Atlantic Ocean Arctic Ocean 12 Assiniboine–Red 19 Great Lakes 6 Peace–Athabasca 13 Winnipeg 20 Ottawa 7 Lower Mackenzie 14 Lower Saskatchewan–Nelson 21 St. Lawrence 8 Arctic Coast–Islands 15 Churchill 22 North Shore–Gaspé 16 Keewatin–Southern Baffin Island 23 Saint John–St. Croix Gulf of Mexico 17 Northern Ontario 24 Maritime Coastal 9Missouri 18 Northern Quebec 25 Newfoundland–Labrador
Sources: Statistics Canada, Environment, Energy and Transportation Statistics Division, 2009, special tabulation from Pearse, P.H., F. Bertrand and J.W. MacLaren, 1985, Currents of Change: Final Report of the Inquiry on Federal Water Policy, Environment Canada, Ottawa.
E-78 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Water Quality & Quantity
Section 2: Freshwater supply and demand 2020 Up-Date Environmental Canada is the second largest country in the world and has the third largest renewable freshwater supply worldwide (Table 2.1). Among developed countries, its water resources per capita are exceeded only by Iceland’s.3 However, this freshwater is not always easily available for use since it is unevenly distributed across the landmass and its supply varies from month to month and year to year. Water use per capita is also among the highest in the world—it is surpassed only by the United States. As a proportion of the total renewable freshwater resource, Canadian water withdrawals for industry, households and agricultural use are relatively low (1%). However, challenges in balancing supply and use can still be an issue due to the temporal and regional variation of water supply and demand. Water use and other human activities can also have impacts on the quality of freshwater resources and the health of ecosystems. Monitoring changes in water resources, their quality and use is important, particularly given the changing demand for water resources due to demographic and economic factors, resource development, as well as ongoing changes in precipitation and temperature patterns and extreme weather events.
Table 2.1 Renewable freshwater resources, water use and gross domestic product for selected countries 1 2 Total area, Population, Total renewable freshwater resources Total water withdrawals Gross domestic 2014 2015 Per year Per capita Per area Per year Per capita product, 2014 million US dollars km2 thousand km3/year m3 per capita m3/m2 km3/year m3 per capita US dollars per capita3 Algeria 2,381,740 39,667 12 294 0.005 8 225 213,518 5,383 Argentina 2,780,400 43,417 876 20,181 0.315 38 898 543,490 12,518 Australia 7,741,220 23,969 492 20,527 0.064 20 824 1,471,439 61,389 Brazil 8,515,770 207,848 8,647 41,603 1.015 75 370 2,346,523 11,290 Canada 9,978,923 35,852 3,478 103,899 0.349 38 1,078 1,785,390 49,799 China 9,600,000 1,407,306 2,840 2,018 0.296 554 411 10,430,590 7,412 Egypt 1,001,450 91,508 58 637 0.058 78 911 282,242 3,084 France 549,090 64,395 211 3,277 0.384 33 521 2,829,192 43,935 Germany 357,170 80,689 154 1,909 0.431 33 411 3,868,291 47,941 India 3,287,260 1,311,051 1,911 1,458 0.581 761 602 2,054,941 1,567 Mexico 1,964,380 127,017 462 3,637 0.235 80 658 1,294,695 10,193 Russian Federation 17,098,250 143,457 4,525 31,543 0.265 66 456 1,849,940 12,895 South Africa 1,219,090 54,490 51 936 0.042 13 270 349,819 6,420 United States 9,831,510 321,774 3,069 9,538 0.312 486 1,543 17,348,072 53,914 1. Renewable water resource data are the long-term total renewable freshwater resources (typically 1961 to 1990) listed in the United Nations AQUASTAT database for 2014, with the exception of Canada, which uses the long term average yield from 1971 to 2012 produced by Statistics Canada. The per capita values for Canada use population from the 2011 Census to be consistent with per capita water yield values by drainage region in Table 2.2. 2. Total water withdrawal volumes are for 2013 for Australia and Canada, 2012 for Algeria, 2011 for Mexico and Argentina, 2010 for France, Germany, Brazil, India, Egypt and the United States, 2005 for China, 2001 for the Russian Federation and 2000 for South Africa. Excluding Canada, total and per capita withdrawal values were taken from the AQUASTAT Main Database. Canada’s total and per capita withdrawals were updated to 2013 using Statistics Canada’s Physical Flow Account and population estimates. 3. Per capita gross domestic product is calculated using the 2015 population data. Note: Countries were chosen by reason of historical comparability with Human Activity and the Environment 2010, availability of current data and geographic coverage. They include nine of the top ten countries by total area and six of the top ten by total volume of renewable freshwater resources. Sources: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2016, AQUASTAT Main Database and country-specific factsheets, www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/water_res/index. stm (accessed August 15, 2016); United Nations Statistics Division, 2016, “GDP by Type of Expenditure at current prices - US dollars,” National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates, http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?q=GDP+US+dollars&d=SNAAMA&f=grID:101;currID:USD;pcFlag:0&c=2,3,5,6&s=_crEngNameOrderBy:asc,yr:desc&v=1 (accessed May 18, 2016); Statistics Canada, CANSIM Tables 153-0116 and 051-0001, www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/home-accueil?&lang=eng&MM=as (accessed May 17, 2016).
3 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2016, AQUASTAT Main Database, www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastsate/water_res/index.stm (accessed May 17, 2016).
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-79 Water Quality & Quantity
2.1 Renewable freshwater in Canada Canada’s many different landscapes and climate regions result in considerable challenges when measuring when, where, and how much freshwater is provided to ecosystems; how much is available for human use; and if the rate of renewal may be changing over time. As well, water quality varies naturally and can be degraded by human activities (Textbox 2.1).
Water yield Water yield4 is an estimate of freshwater runoff into streams and rivers and provides information on Canada’s renewable freshwater supply. The average annual water yield for Canada from 1971 to 20135 was 3,478 km3 or 0.349 m3/m2, equivalent to a depth of 349 mm across the extent of the country. Overall, this yield corresponds to renewable freshwater resources of 103,899 m3 per person (Table 2.2). The distribution of water yield varies widely across the country (Map 2.1).6 The Pacific Coastal drainage region in British Columbia had the highest water yield per unit area in the country at 1.5 m3/m2. On a per capita basis, an average of 339,002 m3 of renewable water were produced per person in this drainage region. The lowest yields were found in the Prairies—the average annual water yield per unit area for the Missouri, Assiniboine– Red, South Saskatchewan and North Saskatchewan drainage regions was 0.05 m3/m2. Average water yield per capita was also comparatively low—an average of 5,689 m3/person.
4 Water yield estimates are derived from data on the monthly volume of unregulated flows in Canada’s rivers and streams. Although the water yield provides an estimate of renewable freshwater, it can include some water that is considered non-renewable (e.g., melt water from receding glaciers). A more complete discussion of the methodology for estimating water yield is presented in Appendix D and in Statistics Canada, 2009, “The Water Yield for Canada as a Thirty-year Average (1971 to 2000): Concepts, Methodology and Initial Results,” Environment Accounts and Statistics Analytical and Technical Paper Series, Catalogue no. 16-001-M, no.7, www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/16-001-m/16-001-m2009007-eng.htm. 5 The water yield estimates are 42-year annual averages (1971 to 2013), with the exception of estimates for drainage region 1, which is based on 41 years of data (1971 to 2012); drainage regions 5, 7, 17 and 18 and portions of 8, 16 and 25 (Labrador), which are based on 20 years of data (1976 to 1995); and portions of drainage region 8 and 16, which are based on a 23-year average (1972 to 1994) for the Arctic Archipelago (Spence and Burke, 2008). These different time periods are used due to lower availability of hydrometric data in the North. As well, because there are fewer stations in northern Canada, only the long-term average annual water yield is publishable for these regions—data quality was insufficient to derive the monthly water yield or the change over time. 6 Spatial data files (ArcGIS®, file extension: .shp) for this map can be downloaded from the HTML version of the publication, www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/16-201-x/16-201-x2017000-eng.htm.
E-80 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Water Quality & Quantity niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental Table 2.2 Average annual water yield and selected statistics by drainage region, 1971 to 2013 Average annual Water yield Water yield Water yield Average annual Population, water yield, per area, per capita, variability index, evapotranspiration, Total area1 2011 1971 to 20132 1971 to 20132 1971 to 2013 1971 to 20133 1981 to 20104 code km2 persons km3 m3/m2 m3/person monthly CV m3/m2 Canada … 9,978,923 33,476,688 3,478.2 0.35 103,899 1.05 0.23 Pacific Coastal 1 334,455 1,505,007 510.2 1.53 339,002 0.50 0.26 Fraser–Lower Mainland 2 233,104 2,336,941 129.3 0.55 55,337 0.83 0.33 Okanagan–Similkameen 3 15,603 327,548 4.3 0.27 13,070 1.44 0.41 Columbia 4 87,323 160,896 67.9 0.78 422,042 1.04 0.41 Yukon 5 332,906 32,280 106.0 0.32 3,283,759 .. 0.14 Peace–Athabasca 6 485,145 406,303 99.5 0.21 244,789 1.01 0.31 Lower Mackenzie 7 1,330,490 52,844 246.3 0.19 4,660,913 .. 0.17 Arctic Coast–Islands 8 1,764,280 20,133 231.3 0.13 11,488,870 .. 0.11 Missouri 9 27,096 8,439 0.5 0.02 62,660 2.14 0.33 North Saskatchewan 10 150,151 1,559,613 10.4 0.07 6,700 1.04 0.34 South Saskatchewan 11 177,623 2,168,447 10.3 0.06 4,732 1.10 0.34 Assiniboine–Red 12 190,704 1,464,936 8.4 0.04 5,702 2.49 0.39 Winnipeg 13 107,655 82,775 25.9 0.24 312,611 0.87 0.40 Lower Saskatchewan–Nelson 14 360,887 216,586 51.7 0.14 238,501 0.92 0.32 Churchill 15 313,568 94,292 51.0 0.16 541,004 0.75 0.24 Keewatin–Southern Baffin Island 16 939,569 13,968 192.0 0.20 13,745,664 .. 0.13 Northern Ontario 17 691,809 134,355 199.2 0.29 1,482,638 .. 0.31 Northern Quebec 18 940,193 109,239 516.3 0.55 4,726,324 .. 0.18 Great Lakes 19 317,860 11,287,184 133.3 0.42 11,806 0.72 0.48 Ottawa 20 146,353 1,957,937 64.3 0.44 32,858 0.80 0.47 St. Lawrence 21 118,733 6,583,552 72.3 0.61 10,983 0.76 0.39 North Shore–Gaspé 22 369,095 508,869 290.4 0.79 570,600 0.91 0.27 Saint John–St. Croix 23 41,903 413,581 29.8 0.71 72,156 0.89 0.48 Maritime Coastal 24 122,057 1,515,262 103.6 0.85 68,343 1.03 0.47 Newfoundland–Labrador 25 380,361 515,698 324.2 0.85 628,662 .. 0.23 Newfoundland (Island)5 … 111,186 487,808 125.6 1.13 257,404 0.62 0.34 1. Total area includes land and water. 2. The water yield estimates are 42-year annual averages (1971 to 2013), with the exception of estimates for drainage region 1, which is based on 41 years of data (1971 to 2012); drainage regions 5, 7, 17 and 18 and portions of 8, 16 and 25 (Labrador), which are based on 20 years of data (1976 to 1995); and portions of drainage region 8 and 16, which are based on a 23- year average (1972 to 1994) for the Arctic Archipelago (Spence and Burke, 2008). 3. Variability is measured by using a coefficient of variation (CV) that allows the comparison of all months in all years of the 42-year time period. The CV of the water yield data is a measure of the dispersion or variation in the monthly yield values over the period 1971 to 2013. It is defined as the ratio of the standard deviation of the monthly values to the mean. A higher CV indicates that the monthly data are more variable from year to year. The CV for the Pacific Coastal drainage region is for the period 1971 to 2012. The CV was not calculated for drainage regions 5, 7, 8, 16, 17, 18 and the Labrador portion of 25. 4. Evapotranspiration is taken from a dataset providing estimates of actual evapotranspiration at a 1 km resolution, which is modeled by integrating remote sensing land surface data and gridded climate data. Data exclude the Great Lakes. 5. Data for Newfoundland (Island) are disaggregated from the Newfoundland–Labrador drainage region because data on the variability index, monthly water yield and trends in water yield over time are only available for this portion of the region. Note: The water yield and evapotranspiration statistics are provided to allow comparisons across regions. They are not intended to be used for the purposes of a water budget. Sources: Statistics Canada, Environment, Energy and Transportation Statistics Division, 2017, special tabulation from the 2011 Census of Population; Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2015, Water Survey of Canada, Archived Hydrometric Data (HYDAT), www.ec.gc.ca/rhc-wsc/default.asp?lang=En&n=4EED50F1-1 (accessed December 3rd, 2015); Spence, C. and A. Burke, 2008, “Estimates of Canadian Arctic archipelago runoff from observed hydrometric data,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 362, pp. 247–259; Wang, S., Y. Yang, Y. Luo and A. Rivera, 2013, “Spatial and seasonal variations in evapotranspiration over Canada’s landmass,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 3561–3575, doi: 10.5194/ hess-17-3561-2013.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-81 Water Quality & Quantity
Map 2.1 Average annual runoff in Canada, 1971 to 2013
Runoff (mm)
3,000 2,000 to < 3,000 1,000 to < 2,000 800 to < 1,000 ARCTIC OCEAN 600 to < 800 400 to < 600 200 to < 400 100 to < 200 100 100 50 to < 100
200 200 < 50
400 Drainage region boundaries 800 Whitehorse 600 ! Northern limit of 2013 data
200 ! Iqaluit 200 Spence and Burke, 2008 400 Yellowknife !
200 1000 600
100
800 50 50 400 400 Hudson 2000 200 Bay 600 100 50 PACIFIC 3000 St. OCEAN 800 200 John's 100
3000 1000 Edmonton 100 1000
! 600
2000 2000 100 ! 800 1000 ! Calgary 200
! Vancouver ! 50 Victoria
400 Regina ! Charlottetown Winnipeg ! ! 400 800 ! !1000 Québec ! 800 Halifax
600 Montréal 400 ! Ottawa ! 600 Fredericton
ATLANTIC ! OCEAN 400 Toronto
0400800200 km
Note: Runoff data were derived from discharge values from hydrometric stations with natural flows for the period 1971 to 2013 below the boundary delineated on the map and 1971 to 2004 above the boundary line with the exception of the Arctic Islands where estimates were taken from Spence and Burke, 2008. Sources: Statistics Canada, Environment, Energy and Transportation Statistics Division, 2017, based on data from Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2015, Water Survey of Canada, Archived Hydrometric Data (HYDAT), www.ec.gc.ca/rhc-wsc/default.asp?lang=En&n=4EED50F1-1 (accessed December 3, 2015); Spence, C. and A. Burke, 2008, “Estimates of Canadian Arctic Archipelago runoff from observed hydrometric data,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 362, pp. 247–259.
E-82 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Water Quality & Quantity niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental 11 .12Table .13 . 2.3 Freshwater quality, by drainage region, 2010 to 2012 Freshwater quality Poor Marginal Fair Good Excellent Total code number of sites Canada … 3 27 64 69 9 172 Pacific Coastal 1 0 04206 Fraser–Lower Mainland 2 0 23117 Okanagan–Similkameen 3 0 01102 Columbia 4 0 02507 Peace–Athabasca 6 0 14016 North Saskatchewan 10 0 02406 South Saskatchewan 11 0 225211 Assiniboine–Red 12 0 393015 Winnipeg 13 0 00011 Lower Saskatchewan–Nelson 14 0 147012 Great Lakes 19 0 564116 Ottawa 20 0 126110 St. Lawrence 21 3 8 12 5 0 28 Saint John–St. Croix 23 0 037010 Maritime Coastal 24 0 278118 Newfoundland–Labrador 25 0 2 3 11 1 17 Note: Freshwater quality was assessed at 172 sites using the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment’s Water Quality Index (www.ccme.ca/en/resources/canadian_ environmental_quality_guidelines/calculators.html). Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2016, “Regional freshwater quality in Canadian rivers,” Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators, www.ec.gc.ca/ indicateurs-indicators/default.asp?lang=En&n=1C71AB61-1 (accessed April 15, 2016).
Surface water sources used to produce drinking water for communities are monitored so that drinking water plants can ensure appropriate water treatment including filtration and disinfection. One important measure of the quality of source water for drinking water treatment plants is turbidity, which refers to the relative cloudiness of water, caused by suspended particles in the water. These particles can include clay, silts, metals, organic matter and microorganisms.11 There is a considerable range in the level of suspended sediment that occurs naturally.12 These levels vary between watersheds and seasonally within watersheds, generally increasing during spring runoff and declining during summer low-flow periods. Since turbidity can be affected by runoff and erosion, it can therefore be affected by human activities that disturb land, such as construction, logging, mining, farming, as well as many others. Sudden increases in turbidity in water bodies that are normally clear can indicate a water quality problem. In 2013, the Survey of Drinking Water Plants collected information on monthly maximum turbidity values for surface water sources. These values were highest in the Lower Saskatchewan–Nelson, North Saskatchewan and Assiniboine–Red drainage regions in the Prairies and in the St. Lawrence drainage region, while the lowest levels were seen in drainage regions in British Columbia and the Atlantic provinces (Map 2.3).13 Results were similar for 2011.
11 Statistics Canada, 2015, “Source water quality, 2013,” Environment Fact Sheets, Catalogue no. 16-508-X, www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/16-508-x/16-508-x2015009-eng.htm. 12 Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2016, “Suspended Sediment Load in Select Canadian Rivers,” Erosion & Sedimentation, www.ec.gc.ca/eau-water/default. asp?lang=En&n=32121A74-1#sec5 (accessed August 11, 2016). 13 Statistics Canada, 2015, “Source water quality, 2013,” Environment Fact Sheets, Catalogue no. 16-508-X, www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/16-508-x/16-508-x2015009-eng.htm.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-83 Water Quality & Quantity
Table 2.6 Water intake in manufacturing industries, by type of supply, water source and drainage region, 2013 Publicly-supplied Self-supplied Freshwater Saline Saline water source, Freshwater Freshwater water source, Total Total water Freshwater surface water source, source, source, groundwater self-supplied, intake, source bodies groundwater other tidewater and other all sources all sources code million cubic metres Canada … 458.5 3,062.6 137.6 104.6 190.7 x 3,497.5 3,956.0 Pacific Coastal 1 x 233.2 x x 46.6 0.0 x 315.4 Fraser–Lower Mainland 2 17.4 202.6 10.9 28.7 0.0 F 242.2 259.6 Okanagan–Similkameen 3 3.3 F x F 0.0 x 0.1 3.4 Columbia 4 x x 0.4 x 0.0 0.0 x 0.0 Yukon 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Peace–Athabasca 6 x 142.2 x x 0.0 x x 176.9 Lower Mackenzie 7 0.0 0.0 x x 0.0 0.0 x x Arctic Coast–Islands 8 x 0.0 0.0 x 0.0 0.0 x x Missouri 9 x 0.0 x 0.0 0.0 0.0 x x North Saskatchewan 10 14.2 38.9 x x 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.9 South Saskatchewan 11 26.6 49.5 F 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.9 Assiniboine–Red 12 21.1 x 17.0 x 0.0 x 0.0 39.2 Winnipeg 13 0.3 x 0.0 F 0.0 0.0 x x Lower Saskatchewan–Nelson 14 x 27.0 1.6 x 0.0 0.0 x 29.6 Churchill 15 0.0 x x x 0.0 0.0 x x Keewatin–Southern Baffin Island 16 x x 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 x x Northern Ontario 17 x x F 0.0 0.0 0.0 x 42.8 Northern Quebec 18 0.7 x 0.3 F 0.0 0.0 x x Great Lakes 19 115.0 1,250.1 10.3 x 0.0 x 1,261.8 1,376.8 Ottawa 20 5.8 127.5 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 128.3 134.1 St. Lawrence 21 146.9 529.4 17.7 x 0.0 x 577.1 724.0 North Shore–Gaspé 22 4.9 83.2 0.8 x x x 84.5 89.4 Saint John–St. Croix 23 54.6 72.1 2.8 2.3 4.7 0.2 82.2 136.8 Maritime Coastal 24 x 43.2 25.9 x 133.4 F x 244.5 Newfoundland–Labrador 25 11.7 x F x x 0.0 7.3 19.0 Sources: Statistics Canada, CANSIM Tables 153-0051 and 153-0050 (www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/home-accueil?&lang=eng&MM=as) (accessed May 3, 2016).
E-84 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Water Quality & Quantity niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Chart 2.12 Per capita residential water use, 2013
Newfoundland and Labrador Yukon British Columbia Prince Edward Island Quebec Northwest Territories New Brunswick Canada Nova Scotia Ontario Saskatchewan Manitoba Alberta Nunavut
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 litres per person per day
Note: At the national level, the sector of water use was unknown for 21% of publicly-supplied water. The provinces and territories with the highest percentage of unknown water use were Newfoundland and Labrador (72%), Northwest Territories, (71%), New Brunswick (60%), and Québec (30%). Figures in this chart represent the results for plants that reported the percentage of potable water used by the residential sector. Higher proportions of unknown water use reduce the accuracy of average daily residential water use estimates. Source: Statistics Canada, CANSIM Table 153-0127 (accessed April 1, 2016).
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-85 Water Quality & Quantity
Chart 2.15 Water use by final demand category, 2013
Total, industries and households
Personal expenditure (households)
International exports
Gross fixed capital formation
Government net current expenditure
Non-profit institutions serving households' consumption expenditure 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 million cubic metres
Note: Water use by the electric power generation, transmission and distribution industry does not include water use for hydro-electric power generation. The category personal expenditure includes direct household water use in addition to the industrial amounts required to satisfy household demand for goods and services. Final demand results are derived from a hybrid input-output model that combines physical data by industry with economic data on production and consumption of goods and services. See the Methodological Guide: Canadian System of Environmental-Economic Accounting, Catalogue no. 16-509-X for more information. Source: Statistics Canada, CANSIM Table 153-0129 (accessed February 9, 2017).
Competing water demands In certain areas of the country, concerns have been raised about the allocation of water among competing water demands including drinking water, agriculture, manufacturing and other industries during periods of water scarcity.86 Lower than normal streamflows can have significant economic effects on agriculture, fisheries, municipalities and industries including electricity production, while also impacting water quality, aquatic habitat and opportunities for recreation.87 Balancing the demand for water from these different sectors may be more challenging during the summer months, which often coincide with increased demand for irrigation and municipal water, while at the same time water supplies are at a low.88
86 Hipel, K.W. , L. Fang and L. Wang, 2013, “Fair water resources allocation with application to the South Saskatchewan river basin, Canadian Water Resources Journal, Vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 47–60, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2013.773767 (accessed May 12, 2016). 87 Bonsal, B. and A. Shabbar, 2008, “Impacts of large-scale circulation variability on low streamflows over Canada: A review,” Canadian Water Resources Journal, Vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 137–154; Burn, D.H. et al., 2008, “The processes, patterns and impacts of low flows across Canada,” Canadian Water Resources Journal, Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 107–124. 88 Schindler, D.W. and W.F. Donahue, 2006, “An impending water crisis in Canada’s western prairie provinces, PNAS, Vol. 103, no. 19, pp. 7210–7216, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/ pnas.0601568103 (accessed May 12, 2016); Essa Technologies Ltd. and Solander Ecological Research, 2009, Instream Flow Needs Analysis for the Okanagan Water Supply & Demand Project, www.obwb.ca/fileadmin/docs/okanagan_instream_flow_needs_analysis_essa.pdf (accessed May 9, 2016); Bradford, M.J. and J.S. Heinonen, 2008, “Low flows, instream flow needs and fish ecology in small streams, Canadian Water Resources Journal, Vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 165–180.
E-86 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Water Quality & Quantity niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Table A.1 Selected land cover and land use statistics by drainage region, 2011 Natural and Natural semi- Built-up Arable land for natural Fertilized Irrigated Barrier Total Water Land area, land, pasture, area, area, area, Barriers, density, area1 area1 area1 20112 20113 20113 20114 20113 20113 20115 20115 code km2 m m/km2 Canada … 9,978,923 1,169,561 8,809,362 59,351 428,953 146,775 9,343,844 249,056 7,665 1,494,919,813 169.7 Pacific Coastal 1 334,455 14,219 320,236 1,547 493 635 331,781 183 79 45,332,602 141.6 Fraser–Lower Mainland 2 233,104 8,937 224,167 2,481 3,294 7,786 219,544 1,224 725 84,982,300 379.1 Okanagan–Similkameen 3 15,603 585 15,018 432 342 1,062 13,766 150 182 11,080,603 737.8 Columbia 4 87,323 2,348 84,975 666 403 898 85,356 148 117 29,827,848 351.0 Yukon 5 332,906 9,540 323,366 340 0 0 332,566 0 0 13,344,637 41.3 Peace–Athabasca 6 485,145 16,725 468,420 2,774 30,241 11,018 441,112 15,065 13 77,076,176 164.5 Lower Mackenzie 7 1,330,490 177,000 1,153,490 619 33 32 1,329,806 2 0 21,374,471 18.5 Arctic Coast–Islands 8 1,764,280 175,804 1,588,476 52 0 0 1,764,228 0 0 2,592,429 1.6 Missouri 9 27,096 915 26,181 313 11,264 11,139 4,380 3,931 144 15,343,911 586.1 North Saskatchewan 10 150,151 7,242 142,909 4,608 74,498 23,740 47,305 44,992 94 118,881,300 831.9 South Saskatchewan 11 177,623 6,219 171,404 4,866 89,676 48,350 34,732 51,958 5,236 140,858,590 821.8 Assiniboine–Red 12 190,704 8,846 181,858 5,987 118,065 21,505 45,146 74,969 266 181,360,534 997.3 Winnipeg 13 107,655 20,525 87,130 914 787 349 105,605 316 1 19,766,658 226.9 Lower Saskatchewan–Nelson 14 360,887 67,617 293,270 2,290 30,894 9,901 317,802 18,752 117 69,974,401 238.6 Churchill 15 313,568 51,918 261,650 763 5,786 4,753 302,267 1,844 5 18,492,635 70.7 Keewatin–Southern Baffin Island 16 939,569 161,011 778,558 25 0 0 939,544 0 0 385,997 0.5 Northern Ontario 17 691,809 56,064 635,745 878 485 134 690,311 88 0 27,268,966 42.9 Northern Quebec 18 940,193 149,081 791,112 749 214 15 939,215 21 0 19,679,873 24.9 Great Lakes 19 317,860 111,577 206,283 10,998 32,846 2,606 271,411 20,631 397 185,410,480 898.8 Ottawa 20 146,353 14,550 131,803 3,508 6,689 1,163 134,993 2,963 26 84,994,689 644.9 St. Lawrence 21 118,733 8,801 109,932 5,971 15,222 1,000 96,540 8,451 206 120,259,882 1,093.9 North Shore–Gaspé 22 369,095 36,933 332,162 1,599 2,372 48 365,076 700 14 39,638,603 119.3 Saint John–St. Croix 23 41,903 1,716 40,187 1,274 1,340 162 39,128 610 3 33,250,648 827.4 Maritime Coastal 24 122,057 6,495 115,562 4,215 3,922 441 113,480 2,007 40 99,884,596 864.3 Newfoundland–Labrador 25 380,361 54,893 325,468 1,486 87 40 378,749 51 0 33,856,985 104.0 Newfoundland (Island)6 ... 111,186 14,235 96,952 1,240 86 40 109,819 51 0 29,637,886 305.7 1. Total area includes land and water using the Atlas of Canada 1:1,000,000 scale hydrography base and includes the Canadian portion of the Great Lakes. Water area is calculated from the Canada-wide 1-km2 gridded Water Fraction derived from National Topographic Data Base maps. 2. Built-up area estimated for 2011 combines the land use classes for settlements and roads from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada's Land Use, 2010, supplemented with estimates of settlements and roads for northern areas in drainage regions 1, 5, 7, 8, 16, 18 and 25. Additional information is available in Appendix E. 3. Data for arable land, natural land for pasture, fertilized area and irrigated area are taken from the 2011 Interpolated Census of Agriculture, which aggregates data from the Census of Agriculture by soil landscape and drainage area units. Arable land is the sum of cropland, summerfallow and tame and seeded pasture. Other land on farms (e.g., land occupied by farm buildings, wetlands and woodlots) is included as built-up or natural land. 4. Natural and semi-natural land is the residual after subtracting built-up area, arable land and natural land for pasture from the total area. 5. Barriers include roads, rail lines and electrical transmission lines, but excludes other types of infrastructure such as pipelines. Barrier density refers to the density of these roads, rail line and transmission lines, measured in metres of barriers per square kilometre of land. 6. Data for Newfoundland (Island) are disaggregated from the Newfoundland–Labrador drainage region because data on the variability index, monthly water yield and trends in water yield over time are only available for this portion of the region. Sources: Statistics Canada, Environment, Energy and Transportation Statistics Division, 2017, special tabulation from Fernandes, R., G. Pavlic, W. Chen and R. Fraser, 2001, 1-km Water Fraction From National Topographic Data Base Maps, Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Earth Science Sector, www.geogratis.ca/geogratis/en/option/select.do?id=8C3D34AE-5BD5-A83C- DB8C-895FB4AD86C6 (accessed April 28, 2010); Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), 2015, Land Use, 2010, http://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/18e3ef1a-497c-40c6-8326- aac1a34a0dec (accessed September 16, 2015); AAFC and Statistics Canada, special tabulation, Census of Agriculture, Census Geographic Component Base 2011; Natural Resources Canada, Earth Sciences Sector, Mapping Information Branch, Centre for Topographic Information, 2012, CanVec, www.geogratis.gc.ca (accessed March 1, 2012).
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-87 Water Quality & Quantity
Table A.2 Selected statistics on water supply and demand by drainage region Average Water Average annual Water yield annual Surface water yield variability evapotrans- Water freshwater yield, per area, index,3 piration, Population, Population, Density, Density, use, intake, 1971 to 1971 to 1971 to 1981 to 1971 2011 1971 2011 20131 20131 20132 20132 2013 20104 code persons persons/km2 million m3 km3 m3/m2 monthly CV m3/m2 Canada … 21,568,311 33,476,688 2.4 3.8 37,892 33,464.7 3,478.2 0.35 1.05 0.23 Pacific Coastal 1 913,522 1,505,007 2.9 4.7 . 617.3 510.2 1.53 0.50 0.26 Fraser–Lower Mainland 2 971,762 2,336,941 4.3 10.4 . 615.3 129.3 0.55 0.83 0.33 Okanagan–Similkameen 3 118,507 327,548 7.9 21.8 . 148.3 4.3 0.27 1.44 0.41 Columbia 4 132,952 160,896 1.6 1.9 . 190.7 67.9 0.78 1.04 0.41 Yukon 5 16,984 32,280 0.1 0.1 . 12.5 106.0 0.32 .. 0.14 Peace–Athabasca 6 206,361 406,303 0.4 0.9 . 297.3 99.5 0.21 1.01 0.31 Lower Mackenzie 7 34,283 52,844 0.0 0.0 . 10.7 246.3 0.19 .. 0.17 Arctic Coast–Islands 8 7,655 20,133 0.0 0.0 . 1.3 231.3 0.13 .. 0.11 Missouri 9 15,328 8,439 0.6 0.3 . 20.2 0.5 0.02 2.14 0.33 North Saskatchewan 10 841,004 1,559,613 5.9 10.9 . 947.4 10.4 0.07 1.04 0.34 South Saskatchewan 11 949,194 2,168,447 5.5 12.7 . 1,942.3 10.3 0.06 1.10 0.34 Assiniboine–Red 12 1,248,357 1,464,936 6.9 8.1 . 1,522.4 8.4 0.04 2.49 0.39 Winnipeg 13 82,806 82,775 1.0 1.0 . 131.8 25.9 0.24 0.87 0.40 Lower Saskatchewan–Nelson 14 238,535 216,586 0.8 0.7 . 70.8 51.7 0.14 0.92 0.32 Churchill 15 63,418 94,292 0.2 0.4 . 7.7 51.0 0.16 0.75 0.24 Keewatin–Southern Baffin Island 16 7,034 13,968 0.0 0.0 . 3.2 192.0 0.20 .. 0.13 Northern Ontario 17 148,658 134,355 0.2 0.2 . 106.0 199.2 0.29 .. 0.31 Northern Quebec 18 90,953 109,239 0.1 0.1 . 30.1 516.3 0.55 .. 0.18 Great Lakes 19 6,632,154 11,287,184 32.2 54.7 . 23,461.0 133.3 0.42 0.72 0.48 Ottawa 20 1,183,662 1,957,937 9.0 14.9 . 364.9 64.3 0.44 0.80 0.47 St. Lawrence 21 4,941,807 6,583,552 45.0 59.9 . 2,045.2 72.3 0.61 0.76 0.39 North Shore–Gaspé 22 518,844 508,869 1.6 1.5 . 203.2 290.4 0.79 0.91 0.27 Saint John–St. Croix 23 366,251 413,581 9.1 10.3 . 174.6 29.8 0.71 0.89 0.48 Maritime Coastal 24 1,318,163 1,515,262 11.4 13.1 . 202.5 103.6 0.85 1.03 0.47 Newfoundland–Labrador 25 520,117 515,698 1.6 1.6 . 338.1 324.2 0.85 .. 0.23 Newfoundland (Island)5 ... 493,938 487,808 5.1 5.0 . .. 125.6 1.13 0.62 0.34 1. Total water use for Canada is taken from the Water Use Account. It is the amount of water withdrawn from water resources to support society in both the economic and residential sectors. Water withdrawals are also referred to as water intake. These estimates include water loss and leakages through water treatment and distribution systems. They exclude the use of water for hydro-electricity production. Surface freshwater intake aggregates data from the Survey of Drinking Water Plants, 2013 and the Industrial Water Use Survey, 2013, with estimates of agricultural water use for 2013 based on the Agricultural Water Use Survey and the Alberta Irrigation Information report. Withdrawals from groundwater, groundwater under the influence of surface water and marine water sources are excluded. Data for water use by the oil and gas industry and households not supplied by a public water provider are also excluded. 2. The water yield estimates are 42-year annual averages (1971 to 2013), with the exception of estimates for drainage region 1, which is based on 41 years of data (1971 to 2012); drainage regions 5, 7, 17 and 18 and portions of 8, 16 and 25 (Labrador), which are based on 20 years of data (1976 to 1995); and portions of drainage region 8 and 16, which are based on a 23- year average (1972 to 1994) for the Arctic Archipelago (Spence and Burke, 2008). For equivalences: 1 km3 is equal to 1 billion m3. 3. Variability is measured by using a coefficient of variation (CV) that allows the comparison of all months in all years of the 42-year time period. The CV of the water yield data is a measure of the dispersion or variation in the monthly yield values over the period 1971 to 2013. It is defined as the ratio of the standard deviation of the monthly values to the mean. A higher CV indicates that the monthly data are more variable from year to year. The CV for the Pacific Coastal drainage region is for the period 1971 to 2012. The CV was not calculated for drainage regions 5,7,8,16, 17, 18 and the Labrador portion of 25. 4. Evapotranspiration is taken from a dataset providing estimates of actual evapotranspiration at a 1 km resolution, which is modeled by integrating remote sensing land surface data and gridded climate data. Data exclude the Great Lakes. 5. Data for Newfoundland (Island) are disaggregated from the Newfoundland–Labrador drainage region because data on the variability index, monthly water yield and trends in water yield over time are only available for this portion of the region. Note: The water yield and evapotranspiration statistics are provided to allow comparisons across regions. They are not intended to be used for the purposes of a water budget. Sources: Statistics Canada, Environment, Energy and Transportation Statistics Division, 2017, special tabulation from the 1971 and 2011 Censuses of Population; Statistics Canada, CANSIM Table 153-0116 (http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/home-accueil?&lang=eng&MM=as) (accessed February 9, 2017); Industrial Water Use Survey, 2013; Survey of Drinking Water Plants, 2013; Agricultural Water Use Survey, 2010, 2012 and 2014; Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development, 2014, Alberta Irrigation Information: Facts and Figures for the Year 2013, Basin Water Management Branch; Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2015, Water Survey of Canada, Archived Hydrometric Data (HYDAT), www.ec.gc.ca/rhc-wsc/default. asp?lang=En&n=4EED50F1-1 (accessed December 3, 2016); Spence, C. and A. Burke, 2008, “Estimates of Canadian Arctic Archipelago runoff from observed hydrometric data,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 362, pp. 247–259; Wang, S., Y. Yang, Y. Luo and A. Rivera, 2013, “Spatial and seasonal variations in evapotranspiration over Canada’s landmass,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 3561–3575, doi: 10.5194/hess-17-3561-2013.
E-88 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Water Quality & Quantity niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental Table A.3 Selected indicators of pressures on water quality by drainage region Risk of Residual soil phosphorus nitrogen on release from agricultural agricultural land, soils, Nitrogen Phosphorus normalized Risk of normalized emissions, emissions, Residual soil across the phosphorus across the National National Median nitrogen on total area of release from total area of Pollutant Pollutant monthly agricultural the drainage agricultural the drainage Release Release maximum land, region, soils, region, Inventory, Inventory, turbidity, 20111 20111 20111 20111 20142 20142 20133 nephelometric code kg/ha kg/km2 mg/kg mg/kg tonnes turbidity units Canada … 23.2 133.4 1.7 0.0 754,011 40,443 .. Pacific Coastal 1 22.0 6.8 2.9 0.0 10,390 493 0.9 Fraser–Lower Mainland 2 23.2 105.5 3.3 0.0 26,489 34,660 1.4 Okanagan–Similkameen 3 20.3 184.5 2.6 0.0 201 0 1.4 Columbia 4 21.4 30.2 2.5 0.0 2,468 1,373 0.7 Yukon 5 … … … … 0 0 .. Peace–Athabasca 6 25.4 215.1 1.6 0.0 155,828 133 5.0 Lower Mackenzie 7 26.8 0.1 1.5 0.0 22,559 0 4.6 Arctic Coast–Islands 8 … … … … 7,607 0 F Missouri 9 11.1 922.5 1.6 1.1 16,289 0 F North Saskatchewan 10 20.0 1,314.5 1.5 0.6 127,820 82 9.0 South Saskatchewan 11 14.2 1,099.9 1.8 1.1 107,769 331 6.3 Assiniboine–Red 12 24.7 1,822.4 1.3 0.7 30,260 524 7.7 Winnipeg 13 31.6 30.3 1.8 0.0 1,703 47 2.4 Lower Saskatchewan–Nelson 14 29.4 337.0 1.3 0.0 1,427 10 20.9 Churchill 15 28.0 94.9 1.6 0.0 12,724 0 4.5 Keewatin–Southern Baffin Island 16 … … … … 1,327 0 F Northern Ontario 17 25.4 1.6 2.9 0.0 6,543 19 4.9 Northern Quebec 18 25.0 1.1 3.5 0.0 5,169 13 F Great Lakes 19 37.5 405.6 1.8 0.0 106,099 781 5.0 Ottawa 20 33.2 172.6 2.2 0.0 11,648 139 4.1 St. Lawrence 21 51.8 690.5 3.5 0.1 33,914 890 9.8 North Shore–Gaspé 22 59.8 38.2 2.2 0.0 14,609 195 1.5 Saint John–St. Croix 23 37.2 142.0 3.5 0.0 9,179 228 1.1 Maritime Coastal 24 37.0 128.1 3.2 0.0 29,272 375 1.4 Newfoundland−Labrador 25 56.0 1.6 6.3 0.0 12,718 149 0.7 Newfoundland (Island)4 … 56.0 5.5 6.3 0.0 5,573 148 .. 1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada produces agri-environmental indicators on residual soil nitrogen (RSN) and the risk of phosphorus release (P-source). The RSN indicator provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen in agricultural soils, in kilograms per hectare, in 2011. RSN accounts for atmospheric deposition, nitrogen fixation, crop inputs (fertilizer and manure), crop removals (harvesting) and gaseous losses of ammonia, nitrous oxide and nitrogen gas. The P-source is the amount of water extractable phosphorus potentially released from agricultural soils in a given year, in milligrams per kilogram. Agricultural land is taken from the Interpolated Census of Agriculture and includes cropland, summerfallow, tame or seeded pasture and natural land for pasture. It excludes other land (e.g., woodlots, wetlands and land occupied by buildings) on farms. 2. Direct emissions from industrial facilities to air, land and water reported to the National Pollutant Release Inventory in 2014, excluding offshore facilities. For nitrogen, substances include ammonia, nitrate ion in solution, nitric acid and nitrogen oxides. For phosphorous, substances include total phosphorous and yellow phosphorous. Substances are reported in tonnes. 3. Turbidity is a measure of the relative clarity of water measured in nephelometric turbidity units (NTU). Data are for raw surface water sources from drinking water facilities that reported turbidity data for at least 10 months in 2013. 4. Data for Newfoundland (Island) are disaggregated from the Newfoundland–Labrador drainage region because data on the variability index, monthly water yield and trends in water yield over time are only available for this portion of the region. Sources: Statistics Canada, Environment, Energy and Transportation Statistics Division, 2017, special tabulation from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), 2015, Agri-environmental Indicator—Residual Soil Nitrogen (RSN), http://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/3f5acb7c-78e6-4127-8867-ddd70e396476 (accessed September 28, 2016); AAFC, 2015, Agri-environmental Indicator—Risk of P release in agricultural land (P-Source), http://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/fc9e5c73-1c1a-47c1-9de4-612569b718fd (accessed September 28, 2016); Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2015, National Pollutant Release Inventory, Pollution Data and Reports, www.ec.gc.ca/inrp-npri/default.asp?lang=En&n=B85A1846-1 (accessed August 24, 2016); Statistics Canada, 2015, “Source water quality, 2013,” Environment Fact Sheets, Catalogue no. 16-508-X.
Statistics Canada. “Freshwater in Canada.” Human Activity and the Environment 2016, (16-201-X) (2017). Last modified March 21, 2017. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/16-201-x/16-201-x2017000-eng.htm. Accessed July 3, 2020.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-89
Biodiversity & Conservation 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Statistics Canada. “Terrestrial ecozones and marine ecoregions of Canada” (Map 1). Human Activity and the Environment (16-201-X) (2013). Last modified November 27, 2015. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/16-201-x/2013000/m029-eng.htm. Accessed July 3, 2020.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-91 Biodiversity & Conservation
Canada's conserved areas
Well-managed conserved areas help preserve species and their habitats for present and future generations by reducing direct human development stresses. The indicators report proportions of Canada's territory conserved through protected areas and other conservation measures. National conserved areas Key results As of the end of 2018 o 11.2% of Canada's terrestrial area (land and freshwater) was conserved, including 10.9% in protected areas o 7.9% of its marine territory was conserved, including 3.1% in protected areas The terrestrial area conserved has increased by 66% in the last 20 years, and by 6% in the last 5 years The marine area conserved has increased by a factor of more than 16 in the last 20 years, and by more than 5 times in the last 5 years
Figure 1. Proportion of area conserved, Canada, 1990 to 2018
Data for Figure 1 Note: Terrestrial areas include land and freshwater. Protected areas include only areas recognized under the international definition. Conserved areas include protected areas as well as areas conserved with other measures. For more information, please refer to the Data sources and methods. Terrestrial areas conserved with other measures were first recognized in 2018. Marine areas conserved with other measures were first recognized in 2017. Data are current as of December 31, 2018. Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Canadian Protected and Conserved Areas Database. Conserved areas include protected areas, as well as areas conserved with other measures (areas that do not meet the formal definition of protected area but are managed in a way that biodiversity is conserved). Both protected areas and areas conserved with other measures contribute to Canada's conservation network. Conserved areas are lands and waters where use is limited. In some cases, certain commercial activities and harvesting of biological resources may be allowed so long as biodiversity is conserved.
E-92 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Biodiversity & Conservation
Areas conserved with other measures include marine refuges. These are long-term fisheries area closures identified as "other effective area-based conservation measures" as described in Aichi 2020 Up-Date Environmental Target 11. The distribution and size of conserved areas is variable. Larger terrestrial conserved areas tend to be located in northern Canada, where there is less intensive use of land for agriculture, settlement, and road networks. Larger marine conserved areas tend to be in offshore areas, where human uses are often less intense. In landscapes and seascapes with competing uses, conserved areas tend to be smaller but more numerous.
Figure 2. Conserved areas, Canada, 2018
Navigate data using the interactive map Note: Data are current as of December 31, 2018. Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Canadian Protected and Conserved Areas Database.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-93 Biodiversity & Conservation
Terrestrial conserved areas, by province and territory Key results The proportion of terrestrial area (land and freshwater) conserved varies by province and territory. It ranges from 3.6% in Prince Edward Island to 15.3% in British Columbia Included in 2018, are o Edéhzhíe Indigenous Protected Area, which added 14 000 km2 of protect area in the Northwest Territories o Birch River Wildland Provincial Park, Kazan Wildland Provincial Park and Richardson Wildland Provincial Park, which added 11 000 km2 of protected area in Alberta o recognition of 30 000 km2 of conservation zones in the Sahtu Land Use plan in the Northwest Territories
Figure 3. Proportion of terrestrial area conserved, by province and territory, Canada, 2018
Data for Figure 3 Note: Terrestrial areas include land and freshwater. Conserved areas include protected areas as well as areas conserved with other measures. Data are current as of December 31, 2018. Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Canadian Protected and Conserved Areas Database. As of the end of 2018, 15.3% of British Columbia's terrestrial area has been conserved. Alberta has 15.1% of its territory conserved. Newfoundland and Labrador, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island each have less than 7% of their terrestrial territory conserved. The remaining provinces and territories have between 8% and 13% of their terrestrial territory conserved. Each province has set aside areas for protection, and progress towards conservation targets varies by jurisdiction. Terrestrial conserved areas, by jurisdiction Key results Provincial and territorial governments have jurisdiction over 57% of all terrestrial conserved areas Parks Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada are responsible for 30% and 11% of Canada's terrestrial conserved areas, respectively
E-94 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Biodiversity & Conservation
Figure 4. Terrestrial conserved areas, by jurisdiction, Canada, 2018 niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Data for Figure 4 Note: Terrestrial areas include land and freshwater. Protected areas include only areas recognized under the international definition. Data are current as of December 31, 2018. Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Canadian Protected and Conserved Areas Database.
Marine conserved areas, by jurisdiction Key results The largest proportion of conserved area is within marine refuges. As of 2018, marine refuges covered about 275 000 km2 of Canada's marine territory Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Parks Canada are responsible for 65% and 27% of Canada's marine conserved areas, respectively In 2018, Scott Islands Marine National Wildlife Area added 11 455 km2 of protected area under Environment and Climate Change Canada's jurisdiction
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-95 Biodiversity & Conservation
Figure 5. Marine conserved areas, by jurisdiction, Canada, 2018
Data for Figure 5 Note: Marine refuges are geographic areas that conserve biodiversity, but do not meet the formal definition of protected areas. Data are current as of December 31, 2018. Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Canadian Protected and Conserved Areas Database. Conserved areas include both protected areas and areas conserved with other measures. Other conservation measures conserve biodiversity but are not recognized under the internationally accepted definition of a protected area. Marine refuges are long-term fisheries area closures that have been identified as areas conserved with other measures. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Parks Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada each have specific but complementary mandates for establishing marine protected areas: Oceans Act marine protected areas (Fisheries and Oceans Canada) are established to conserve marine species and their habitats, including for species that are fished, endangered or threatened marine species, as well as unique habitats and areas of high biological productivity or biodiversity National marine conservation areas (Parks Canada) are established to conserve representative examples of Canada's natural and cultural marine heritage and provide opportunities for public education and enjoyment National wildlife areas and migratory bird sanctuaries (Environment and Climate Change Canada) are established to conserve habitat for a variety of wildlife including migratory birds and endangered species Areas established by these departments, along with provincially established areas contribute to a conservation network. The primary goal of this network is to provide long-term protection of marine biodiversity, ecosystem function and special natural features. The different jurisdictions protect areas for different purposes (see the Role of the Canadian Government in the Oceans Sector and the Role of the Provincial and Territorial Governments in the Oceans Sector), and control the amount of human activity (such as transportation, fishing or recreation) that is allowed. Marine conservation efforts include a wide range of management and stewardship activities. Examples include support for the recovery of species at risk, prevention and
E-96 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Biodiversity & Conservation
mitigation of the impact of aquatic invasive species, and strengthening of Canada's response to ship- source marine pollution. 2020 Up-Date Environmental Conserved areas, by ecological region Ecozones are regions with distinct or characteristic ecological features, such as climate and vegetation. A representative conserved areas network will conserve biodiversity across all of Canada's ecozones. Key results Three (3) terrestrial ecozones, the Tundra Cordillera, the Pacific Maritime and the Arctic Cordillera, have more than 20% of their area protected The Offshore Pacific and the Eastern Arctic both have more than 20% of their area conserved 13% of the Canadian area of the Great Lakes is protected
Figure 6. Proportion of ecozones conserved, Canada, 2018
Data for Figure 6 Note: Conserved areas include protected areas as well as areas conserved with other measures. Data are current as of December 31, 2018. Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Canadian Protected and Conserved Areas Database.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2019. Reprinted with permission. This and other Environmental Indicators can be found at no cost online at https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-indicators.html.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-97 Biodiversity & Conservation
Canada’s National Parks
OVERVIEW:
Parks Canada, an arm of the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, has remained the federal agency responsible for managing and maintaining the National Parks of Canada since its establishment in 1911. Today, the agency enforces and follows the Canada National Parks Act, enacted in 1930 and amended in 2000, and manages a total of 47 National Parks and National Park Reserves, at least one of which can be found in every province; the agency’s oldest and still most popular park, for instance, is located in Banff, Alberta, while its most recent addition was made in 2015 with the creation of the Qausuittuq National Park in Nunavut. The most recent Reserve was created in 2019 with Thaidene Nëné in the Northwest Territories. Together, Canada’s National Parks comprise over 303,000 km2 and service an average of almost 16,000,000 visitors annually. The Parks’ intent remains threefold: to ensure environmental protection, promote tourism/recreation opportunities, and cultivate a shared Canadian natural heritage.
A team of scientists determines the locations of parks in accordance with Parks Canada’s National Parks Systems Plan, enacted in the early 1970s. This plan has established a systematic program that identifies Canada’s 39 distinct natural areas and ensures that each area is represented by at least one national park. Once a natural area is set apart from others—based on features like vegetation, landforms, climate, wildlife, and geology—the federal government determines the exact boundaries of the park itself by considering how well a proposed location represents the area as a whole and to what degree of human impact the area is already subject. Studies and consultations reveal the extent to which a sustained visitor presence will affect the habitat requirements of the area’s wildlife species; the level of protection that a park may offer to exceptional natural phenomena and to vulnerable ecosystems and wildlife; and the implications of a park for existing Aboriginal land claims and treaties with Aboriginal peoples.
The 2000 amendment to the Canada National Parks Act introduced new priorities for the National Parks, foremost among which were a series of management regulations designed to preserve the parks’ “ecological integrity.” Due to this legislation, Parks Canada undertook a series of new conservation strategies and strengthened its ties with a number of public and government partners in regions across Canada. New initiatives include the development of recovery strategies to assist Canada’s vulnerable, threatened, and endangered animals; the reduction of environmental “stressors,” such as natural resource development along park borders, that may negatively affect biodiversity; and education, training, and research development programs designed to facilitate both scientific study within the park and its public consumption. In its pursuit of these aims, Parks Canada adheres to the World Heritage Convention and to the Convention on Biological Diversity.
E-98 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Biodiversity & Conservation
Sources: niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental Parks Canada. “National Park System Plan.” Last modified August 1, 2019. www.pc.gc.ca/en/pn-np/plan. Accessed July 3, 2020.
Parks Canada. “Guiding Principles and Operational Policies.” Last modified March 26, 2018. www.pc.gc.ca/en/docs/pc/poli/princip. Accessed July 3, 2020.
Parks Canada. “National Parks of Canada: Creating New National Parks.” Last modified February 14, 2020. www.pc.gc.ca/en/pn-np/cnpn-cnnp. Accessed July 3, 2020.
Parks Canada. “Ecological Integrity.” Last modified October 8, 2019. www.pc.gc.ca/en/nature/science/conservation/ie-ei. Accessed July 3, 2020.
Natural Resources Canada. “Canada’s National Parks”. Atlas of Canada, 6 th Edition. Date published Jan. 1, 2007. http://ftp.geogratis.gc.ca/pub/nrcan_rncan/raster/atlas_6_ed/reference/eng/natpks_e.pdf. Accessed July 3, 2020.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-99 Biodiversity & Conservation
2020 BIODIVERSITY GOALS & TARGETS FOR CANADA
E-100 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Biodiversity & Conservation niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Preamble
In order to achieve their long-term biodiversity outcomes, federal, provincial and territorial governments endorsed the following set of new medium-term goals and targets. These aspirational goals and targets describe results to be achieved through the collective efforts of a diversity of players both public and private whose actions and decisions have an impact on biodiversity. Governments need to do their part but cannot act alone.
Implementation of the goals and targets will rely on meaningful, full and effective participation of Aboriginal peoples, including First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples. In this respect, while Aboriginal traditional knowledge and customary use of biological UHVRXUFHVDUHVSHFLͤFDOO\KLJKOLJKWHGXQGHUWDUJHWVDQGWKHWUDGLWLRQDONQRZOHGJH innovations and practices of Aboriginal communities are relevant for implementing all of Canada’s biodiversity goals and targets, as is protecting and encouraging customary use of biological resources compatible with their conservation and sustainable use.
Local communities, urban and regional governments, business and industry, conservation DQGVWHZDUGVKLSJURXSVHGXFDWLRQDODQGVFLHQWLͤFLQVWLWXWLRQVDQGFLWL]HQVDUHDOVRDOODEOH to contribute. Canadians are invited to commit to doing their part and to share the results of their efforts.
GOAL A
BY 2020, CANADA’S LANDS AND WATERS ARE PLANNED AND MANAGED USING AN ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO SUPPORT BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION OUTCOMES AT LOCAL, REGIONAL AND NATIONAL SCALES.
Target 1 Target 3 By 2020, at least 17 percent of terrestrial areas and inland By 2020, Canada’s wetlands are conserved or enhanced water, and 10 percent of coastal and marine areas, are to sustain their ecosystem services through retention, conserved through networks of protected areas and other restoration and management activities. effective area-based conservation measures. Target 4 Target 2 By 2020, biodiversity considerations are integrated into By 2020, species that are secure remain secure, and municipal planning and activities of major municipalities population of species at risk listed under federal law exhibit across Canada. trends that are consistent with recovery strategies and management plans. Target 5 By 2020, the ability of Canadian ecological systems to adapt to climate change is better understood, and priority adaptation measures are underway.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-101 Biodiversity & Conservation
GOAL B
BY 2020, DIRECT AND INDIRECT PRESSURES AS WELL AS CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ON BIODIVERSITY ARE REDUCED, AND PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION OF CANADA’S BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ARE MORE SUSTAINABLE.
Target 6 Target 10 By 2020, continued progress is made on the sustainable By 2020, pollution levels in Canadian waters, including management of Canada’s forests. pollution from excess nutrients, arereduced or maintained at levels that support healthy aquatic ecosystems. Target 7 Target 11 By 2020, agricultural working landscapes provide a stable or improved level of biodiversity and habitat capacity. By 2020, pathways of invasive alien species introductions DUHLGHQWLͤHGDQGULVNEDVHGLQWHUYHQWLRQRUPDQDJHPHQW Target 8 plans are in place for priority pathways and species. By 2020, all aquaculture in Canada is managed under a Target 12 science-based regime that promotes the sustainable use of aquatic resources (including marine, freshwater and land By 2020, customary use by Aboriginal peoples of biological based) in ways that conserve biodiversity. resources is maintained, compatible with their conservation and sustainable use. Target 9 Target 13 %\DOOͤVKDQGLQYHUWHEUDWHVWRFNVDQGDTXDWLF plants are managed and harvested sustainably, legally and By 2020, innovative mechanisms for fostering the applying ecosystem-based approaches. conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity are developed and applied.
GOAL C
BYBY 2020,20 CANADIANS HAVE ADEQUATE AND RELEVANT INFORMATION ABOUT BIODIVERSITY AND EECOSYSTEM SERVICES TO SUPPORT CONSERVATION PLANNING AND DECISION-MAKING.
Target 14 Target 16 By 2020, the science base for biodiversity is enhanced By 2020, Canada has a comprehensive inventory of and knowledge of biodiversity is better integrated and protected spaces that includes private conservation areas. more accessible. Target 17 Target 15 By 2020, measures of natural capital related to biodiversity By 2020, Aboriginal traditional knowledge is respected, and ecosystem services are developed on a national scale, promoted and, where made available by Aboriginal peoples, and progress is made in integrating them into Canada’s regularly, meaningfully and effectively informing biodiversity national statistical system. conservation and management decision-making.
GOAL D
BY 2020, CANADIANS ARE INFORMED ABOUT THE VALUE OF NATURE AND MORE ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN ITS STEWARDSHIP.
Target 18 Target 19 By 2020, biodiversity is integrated into the elementary and By 2020, more Canadians get out into nature and participate secondary school curricula. in biodiversity conservation activities.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2016. Reprinted with the permission of the Minister of the Environment, 2020. The full text of the 2020 Biodiversity Goals and Targets for Canada are available for free at www.biodivcanada.ca.
E-102 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Natural Resource Management 2020 Up-Date Environmental
Report on Energy Supply and Demand in Canada
Highlights
Primary energy production in Canada increased 5.0% in 2017 to 20,741 petajoules. This followed a 3.1% increase in 2016.
Analysis Energy supply and demand, 2017 Primary energy production in Canada increased 5.0% in 2017 to 20,741 petajoules. This followed a 3.1% increase in 2016. Crude oil accounted for the largest proportion of primary energy production in Canada in 2017 at 46.4%, followed by natural gas (34.4%), primary electricity (9.0%), total coal (6.4%) and gas plant natural gas liquids (3.8%). It was the eighth consecutive year in which crude oil accounted for the largest share of primary energy production.
Exports and imports increase Exports of Canadian energy and energy products increased 5.6% in 2017 to 13,253 petajoules. Canada exported 79.0% of its crude oil production in 2017, and 46.3% of its marketable natural gas. Imports of energy increased 3.7% in 2017 to 3,784 petajoules. Crude oil accounted for 49.7% of imports, followed by natural gas (24.7%).
Energy consumption increased Canada’s energy consumption increased 2.2% in 2017 to 8,231 petajoules, following a 1.8% decrease in 2016. Energy use increased in four of six sectors: industrial (+4.0%), residential (+3.4%), commercial and other institutional (+3.0%), and agriculture experienced a slight increase. Transportation and public administration saw a small decrease in energy use. Within the industrial sector, energy consumption increased in mining and oil and gas extraction (+8.3%), construction (+4.2%), forestry and logging and support activities (+1.9%), and manufacturing (+1.2%). Retail pump sales continued to represent the largest proportion of energy consumption in the transportation sector (63.4%), followed by road transport and urban transit (13.9%), airlines (9.9%), pipelines (6.7%), railways (3.1%), and marine (2.9%). Refined petroleum products (38.7%) were the main source of energy consumed in Canada in 2017, followed by natural gas (35.2%) and electricity (22.3%).
Energy consumption trends across the country Ontario, Alberta and Quebec continued to account for the majority of energy consumed in Canada. In 2017, their combined share of total energy consumption was 73.7%.
Seven provinces recorded increases in energy consumption in 2017 compared with 2016. Alberta (+6.9%) saw the greatest increase, followed by Manitoba (+3.5%), British Columbia (+2.8%), Saskatchewan (+2.5%), Nova Scotia (+1.7%), Prince Edward Island (+1.0%), and Ontario (+0.5%).
Energy consumption decreased in 3 regions in 2017 compared to 2016. The largest decrease was in the Territories (-13.6%), followed by New Brunswick (-5.5%), and Newfoundland and Labrador (-2.6%).
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-103 Natural Resource Management
Table 3-1 Refined petroleum products, natural units — Canada Refinery liquefied Total petroleum Kerosene refined gases and Light Heavy Petroleum Aviation Aviation Non-energy petroleum (LPG’s), Still gas, Motor Gas, stove oil, Diesel fuel, fuel oil, fuel oil, coke, gasoline, turbo fuel, products, products, secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary energy energy energy energy energy energy energy energy energy energy energy energy megalitres Supply and demand characteristics Production 2,752.4 9,340.7 45,209.3 x 30,894.5 x 4,972.2 2,466.6 93.4 6,975.9 11,763.7 122,131.1 Exports .. .. 11,080.8 x x x x x x 1,362.0 x 28,447.2 Imports .. .. 8,640.6 68.3 x 286.3 x x .. 2,437.8 1,474.8 16,965.8 Inter-regional transfers .. .. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stock variation .. .. x -12.5 76.2 x 45.7 -25.5 x 34.8 x x Inter-product transfers -2,675.4 .. -1,576.0 x -266.8 x x .. x x x -11,100.5 Other adjustments .. 234.4 x 54.5 x -45.6 316.6 3.6 3.8 x 6,703.5 x Availability 77.0 9,575.0 46,055.0 517.5 30,258.7 1,918.1 2,820.2 4,113.7 68.4 7,848.8 11,099.8 114,352.4 Stock change, utilities and industry ...... Transformed to other fuels Transformed to electricity by utilities .. .. 34.5 .. 156.6 73.7 662.3 556.0 ...... 1,483.2 Transformed to electricity by industry .. 234.4 .. .. 108.9 9.9 64.1 50.8 ...... 468.1 Transformed to coke and manufactured gases ...... Transformed to refined petroleum products ...... Transformed to steam generation ...... 0.0 .. .. 2.6 ...... 2.6 Net supply 77.0 9,340.7 46,020.5 517.5 29,993.2 1,834.6 2,091.2 3,506.9 68.4 7,848.8 11,099.8 112,398.5 Producer consumption 77.1 9,340.7 0.7 1.7 x 4.7 x 1,964.2 0.8 x 1,514.3 13,734.4 Non-energy use ...... 4.0 1,094.0 .. .. 8,991.0 10,089.1 Energy use, final demand .. .. 45,486.2 530.8 29,045.7 1,833.7 1,725.9 594.2 67.2 7,721.8 .. 87,005.4 Total industrial .. .. 1,017.2 13.7 5,520.5 148.7 471.5 594.2 0.0 23.6 .. 7,789.3 Total mining and oil and gas extraction .. .. 567.0 7.9 2,393.0 16.2 x 0.1 .. 5.0 .. 3,198.4 Total manufacturing .. .. 54.9 4.3 256.2 86.1 218.5 594.1 0.0 9.5 .. 1,223.4 Pulp and paper manufacturing .. .. 0.9 0.0 x 3.8 x ...... x Iron and steel manufacturing .. .. 1.2 x x x x x ...... 29.6 Aluminum and non-ferrous metal manufacturing ...... 0.0 x x x x ...... x Cement manufacturing ...... 0.0 7.3 0.1 x x ...... 495.7 Refined petroleum products manufacturing ...... 0.0 0.3 .. 0.3 Chemicals and fertilizers manufacturing ...... x x 4.6 x x ...... 59.2 All other manufacturing .. .. 52.8 4.0 x x x x .. 9.3 .. 397.9 Forestry and logging and support activities for forestry .. .. 70.7 0.3 600.5 9.3 x .. .. 9.1 .. x Construction .. .. 324.6 1.3 2,270.9 37.1 x ...... x Total transportation .. .. 42,196.1 0.4 18,040.8 x x .. 58.5 7,110.3 .. 68,447.8 Railways .. .. 12.5 .. 2,187.5 ...... x .. 2,200.2 Total airlines .. .. 1.6 .. 0.5 ...... 58.5 7,048.9 .. 7,109.6 Canadian airlines .. .. 1.6 .. 0.5 ...... 58.5 6,303.2 .. 6,363.9 Foreign airlines ...... 745.7 .. 745.7 Total marine .. .. 16.6 0.4 845.3 x x .. .. x .. 1,931.7 Domestic marine .. .. 16.6 0.4 744.5 x x .. .. x .. 1,542.3 Foreign marine ...... 100.8 .. x ...... 389.3 Pipelines .. .. 4.7 .. 9.4 ...... 14.0 Road transport and urban transit .. .. 1,918.0 .. 7,483.6 ...... x .. 9,412.4 Retail pump sales .. .. 40,242.6 .. 7,514.4 x ...... 47,779.9 Agriculture .. .. 1,580.3 14.6 3,918.5 x x ...... 5,786.8 Residential ...... 66.4 .. x x ...... 1,413.2 Public administration .. .. 300.2 4.9 781.0 110.3 x .. 0.8 177.3 .. x Commercial and other institutional .. .. 392.3 430.7 784.9 143.6 14.1 .. 7.8 410.7 .. 2,184.0 Statistical difference .. .. x x x x x x x x .. x Note: See “Data quality, concepts and methodology — Explanatory notes for tables” section.
E-104 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Natural Resource Management
Table 5-1
Non-energy refined petroleum products — Canada 2020 Up-Date Environmental Petrochemical Naphtha Lubricating oils Other non-energy Total non-energy use of feedstocks specialties Asphalt and greases products refined petroleum products megalitres Supply and demand characteristics Production 2,366.6 x x x 3,022.8 11,763.7 Exports x .. x x x x Imports .. .. x x x 1,474.8 Inter-regional transfers .. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stock variation x x 101.5 20.7 33.7 x Inter-product transfers x -44.6 x -724.8 x x Other adjustments x x x x 4,497.6 6,703.5 Availability 3,104.0 x 3,269.6 1,074.9 x 11,099.8 Producer consumption x .. .. x x 1,514.3 Total non-energy use, final demand 2,904.3 146.5 3,032.3 739.2 2,168.6 8,991.0 Mining and oil and gas extraction .. .. 0.0 95.0 .. 95.0 Manufacturing 2,904.3 .. 333.3 272.7 .. 3,510.3 Forestry and logging and support activities for forestry ...... 7.5 .. 7.5 Construction .. .. x x .. x Transportation ...... 68.3 .. 68.3 Agriculture ...... x .. x Public administration ...... x .. x Commercial and other institutional .. 146.5 766.9 256.2 2,168.6 3,338.3 Statistical difference x x x x x 594.5 Note: See “Data quality, concepts and methodology — Explanatory notes for tables” section.
Table 6-1 Details of natural gas liquids, natural units — Canada Gas plant natural gas Propane Butane Ethane liquids (NGLs) megalitres Supply and demand characteristics Production 12,738.2 7,773.3 14,120.9 34,632.4 Exports 8,021.9 1,718.6 .. 9,740.5 Imports 405.0 655.2 3,527.5 4,587.6 Inter-regional transfers 0.0 0.0 .. 0.0 Stock variation 130.9 -55.1 .. 75.8 Inter-product transfers 1,122.8 1,552.6 .. 2,675.4 Other adjustments 100.5 -801.1 .. -700.65 Availability 6,212.7 7,516.5 17,648.4 31,378.6 Transformed to other fuels Refined petroleum products .. x .. x Net refinery produced liquefied petroleum gases (LPGs) ...... Net supply x x 17,648.4 28,051.5 Producer consumption x 27.1 .. x Non-energy use x x 17,648.4 x Energy use, final demand 5,554.3 .. .. 5,554.3 Total industrial 2,368.5 .. .. 2,368.5 Total mining and oil and gas extraction 1,970.6 .. .. 1,970.6 Total manufacturing x.... x Pulp and paper manufacturing 12.2 .. .. 12.2 Iron and steel manufacturing x .. .. x Aluminum and non-ferrous metal manufacturing x .. .. x Cement manufacturing x.... x Refined petroleum products manufacturing ...... Chemicals and fertilizers manufacturing 4.7 .. .. 4.7 All other manufacturing x.... x Construction x.... x Total transportation 483.0 .. .. 483.0 Road transport and urban transit 483.0 .. .. 483.0 Retail pump sales ...... Agriculture x.... x Residential x.... x Public administration ...... Commercial and other institutional 1,595.6 .. .. 1,595.6 Statistical difference 0.1 .. .. 0.1 Note: See “Data quality, concepts and methodology — Explanatory notes for tables” section.
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-105 Natural Resource Management
Table 12 Oilsands processing operations Thousands of tonnes Megalitres Oilsands mined 652,234 … Bitumen processed1 73,833 … Products produced2 from processed bitumen Synthetic crude oil3 … 59,654 Diesel … 382 Still gas … 4,985 Sulphur 2,000 … Petroleum coke … 10,166 … not applicable 1. Represents bitumen processed into specific products from oil sands mined. 2. Differences between products produced and bitumen processed are accounted for in plant uses, processing losses, etc. 3. Included in the crude oil column in Alberta.
Statistics Canada. Report on Energy Supply and Demand in Canada, 2017 Preliminary (Analysis and Tables 3-1, 5-1, 6-1 and 12). Catalogue no. 57-003-X. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/57-003-x/57-003-x2018002-eng.htm. Accessed July 3, 2020. Please also see the Climate Change & Energy Efficiency section.
E-106 GUIDE DES RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES CANADIENNES 2020-2021 Natural Resource Management niomna pDt 2020 Up-Date Environmental INDUSTRY CANADIAN ELECTRICITY Industry Overview !!! . " # Electricity
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GUIDE 2020-2021 E-107 Natural Resource Management DUf ~ $7530$81 DUf 3 0 }} TDYf _ 7'$5 f
` D ]] ! 785 0 { f f ~ ~ TD TD
$37'$51 0
# __ f ~ UD (31 5 f f
^ D } 30 5 (Y United States, 2018 States, United $) f ` D ^ (2# )()*$& DYf f z ^ B#53 D ( 8"0$ 5 z $) { & ( Z &
( Y Y 7(32 _ $ 85!(2$ f & z