SEH European Congress of Herpetology & DGHT Deutscher

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SEH European Congress of Herpetology & DGHT Deutscher Societas Europaea Herpetologica – SEH Deutsche Gesellschaft für Herpetologie und Terrarienkunde – DGHT SEH European Congress of Herpetology & DGHT Deutscher Herpetologentag Luxembourg and Trier, 25th to 29th September 2011 Contents What – where – when – who?............................................................................................ 3 Welcome to the SEH European Congress of Herpetology & DGHT Deutscher Herpetologentag ...................................................................................6 Program .............................................................................................................................. 7 Abstracts of talks by invited speakers in alphabetical order ......................................... 23 Abstracts of talks in alphabetical order by first author .................................................. 25 Abstracts to key notes and related symposiums in alphabetical order by first author ......................................................................................................... 75 Abstracts of posters in alphabetical order by first author .............................................90 List of congress participants with e.mail addresses ......................................................128 2 What – where – when – who? Presenters Societas Europaea Herpetologica, SEH (www.seh-herpetology.org), and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Herpetologie und Terrarienkunde e.V., DGHT (www.dght.de), in collaboration with the National Museum of Natural History, Vertebrate Department, Luxembourg (www.mnhn.lu) and Trier University, Biogeographie Department, Trier, Germany (www.biogeographie.uni-trier.de/index.php?id=2528). Venue Neumünster Abbey, 28, rue Münster, L-2160 Luxembourg (Salle Robert Krieps and Salle Edmond Dune), and the National Museum of Natural History, 25 rue Münster, L-2160 Luxembourg, (cafeteria, ground floor), all time, except 28th September (whole day): Trier University, Campus II, Behringstraße 21, D-54296 Trier-Petrisberg (Audimax HS 11-13). See program for details. Conference office Sunday (25th September): National Museum of Natural History, 25, rue Münster, L-2160 Luxembourg, (foyer), 15:00-19:00 hrs. Monday, Tuesday and Thursday (26th, 27th, 29th September): Neumünster Abbey, 28, rue Münster, L-2160 Luxembourg; Salle Robert Krieps (foyer), during the conference. Wednesday (28th September): Trier University, Campus II, Behringstraße 21, D-54296 Trier-Petrisberg (old chapel, room K101), during the conference. Emergency? In case you feel it is necessary please contact us via mobile phone: Luxembourg: +352 – 691 554 346 (Edmée Engel). Trier: +49 - 151 - 284 069 43 (Stefan Lötters). Poster session National Museum of Natural History, 25, rue Münster, L-2160 Luxembourg (ground floor), Monday, 26th September, 17:45-19:00 hrs. 3 What – where – when – who? SEH OGM Neumünster Abbey, 28, rue Münster, L-2160 Luxembourg (Salle Robert Krieps), Tuesday, 27th September, 16:45-18:45 hrs. SEH Intern council meeting National Museum of Natural History, 25, rue Münster, L-2160 Luxembourg (Salle Découverte), Sunday, 25th September, 17:00-19:00 hrs. SEH Internal meeting of Conservation Committee National Museum of Natural History, 25, rue Münster, L-2160 Luxembourg (cafeteria), Monday, 26th September, 19:00-21:00 hrs. SEH Internal meeting of Mapping Committee National Museum of Natural History, 25, rue Münster, L-2160 Luxembourg (Salle Découverte), Monday, 26th September, 19:00-21:00 hrs. Welcome party, get-together and others See program or contact conference office. Bus leave (Trier day) Please note that on the day at Trier University (Wednesday, 28th September), there will be a transfer leaving at 08:00 hrs from: 9, place de la Gare, L-1616 Luxembourg (front to the local post office). Please be on time! Local Organizing Committee Edmée Engel, National Museum of Natural History Luxembourg; Franz Gassert, National Museum of Natural History Luxembourg; Stefan Lötters, Trier University & DGHT; Silvia Macina, DGHT; Myriam Simon, National Museum of Natural History Luxembourg; Michael Veith, Trier University. 4 What – where – when – who? Additional staff Pascal Aachen, National Museum of Natural History Luxembourg (MNHN); Cindy Anders, Trier University; Kerstin Bidinger, Trier University; Luigi Cipriani, MNHN; Corinne Colles, MNHN; Elsa Duarte, MNHN; Guy Eicher, MNHN; Btissam El Filali, MNHN; Jan O. Engler, Trier University; Geneviève Faber, MNHN; Katharina J. Filz, Trier University; Noël Fischbach, MNHN; Alexandra Geilen, Trier University; Jérôme Herr, MNHN; Ute Herrmann, Trier University; Isabelle Keller, MNHN; Nora Lisa Krutz, Trier University; Alessandro Luziotti, MNHN; Michael Mayer, Trier University; Andreas Mendt, DGHT; Patrick Michaely, MNHN; Bernadette Michel, MNHN; Valentin Mingo, Trier University; Corrado Modica, Trier University; Anibal Nogueira, MNHN; Kamila Nowak, Trier University; Michel Possing, MNHN; Julia Rautenberg, Trier University; Daniela Rössler, Trier University; Elena Rudolf, Trier University; Frank Schmoetten, MNHN; Lisa M. Schulte, Trier, University; Ulrich Schulte, Trier University; Norman Wagner, Trier University; Philine Werner, Trier University; Katharina C. Wollenberg, Trier University; and the whole staff of the MNHN building. Scientific board members Salvador Carranza, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Barcelona, Spain; Ylenia Chiari, University of Montpellier 2, France; Mathieu Denoel, University of Liège, Belgium; Edmée Engel, National Museum of Natural History Luxembourg; Trenton W.J. Garner, Zoological Society of London; Franz Gassert, National Museum of Natural History Luxembourg; Richard Griffiths, University of Kent, UK; Spartak Litvinchuk, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia; Stefan Lötters, DGHT & Trier University, Germany; Russell Mittermeier, Conservation International; Andrew Storfer, University of Washington State, Pullman, USA; Simon Stuart, IUCN SSC; Zoltan T. Nagy, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels; Miguel Vences, University of Braunschweig, Germany; Michael Veith, Trier University, Germany. DGHT-Nachzuchttagung Immediately after the international scientific herp congress, from Friday to Sunday (30th September to 2nd October), the DGHT-Nachzuchttagung will take place at Trier, a herpetocultural conference with focus on keeping/breeding herps in captivity and watching them in the wild (conference language is German). Visitors of the SEH European Congress of Herpetology/DGHT Deutscher Herpetologentag are welcome to attending this meeting. Please contact the conference office. 5 Welcome Welcome to the SEH European Congress of Herpetology & DGHT Deutscher Herpetologentag From 25th to 29th September 2011, the National Museum of Natural History Luxembourg (MNHN) and Trier University will host this special international meeting uniting two leading conferences in European Herpetology. The SEH European Congress of Herpetology is held every two years in different European countries since 1979; this will be the 16th meeting. Deutscher Herpetologentag is equivalent to the annual meeting of the German herpetological society DGHT, taking place the 47th time this year. This will be the first joint meeting of these two important societies, an extraordinary milestone meeting in European Herpetology. Not only two societies but also two congress venues! Most of the meeting will take place at Neumünster Abbey cultural centre next to the National Museum of Natural History in Luxembourg. Key note lectures and symposiums will take place during one day at Trier University at Trier-Petrisberg. Transfer on the Trier day is provided of course. However, please make sure to be on time! For bus leave see “What – where – when – who?”. Scientific presentations include three lectures on topics of general interest by invited speakers and three key notes on current topics by invited speakers to which each a minisymposium is dedicated. Apart from these special lectures and key notes, a wide array of scientific talks (more than 60) will be given in parallel sessions. eW have tried to group them and know that this is not absolutely satisfying in all cases. Also the scientific program does include more than 60 poster presentations – do not miss the poster session, as there will be no parallel program. Besides scientific presentations, some social events will take place including the welcome party, opening ceremony and get-together. The last mentioned is dedicated to introduce you to some local culture. Other occasions to learn more about the region and its history include sightseeing tours in both Luxembourg and Trier; for those who are interested more in science, we offer a guided tour through the museum and a bat trip, as for herps it may be too late in the year. If you have any further need of information, please contact the conference office or do not hesitate to contact any of the staff members (indicated by colored name tags). At the point of writing these lines, we counted 251 registrations from 37 countries. We welcome all of you and hope that you will enjoy this extraordinary meeting! Luxembourg and Trier, September 2011 Local Organizing Committee 6 Sunday – Monday – Program Sunday, 25th September 2011 15:00-19:00 Registration (MNHN, Foyer) 17:00-19:00 Intern council meeting SEH (MNHN, Salle Découverte) 19:00-21:00 Welcome party (MNHN, cafeteria) Monday, 26th September 2011 08:00-09:30 Registration (MNHN, Foyer) Luxembourg, Neumünster Abbey Salle Robert Krieps 09:30-10:15 Opening ceremony C. Corti,
Recommended publications
  • Rare Species of Shield-Head Vipers in the Caucasus
    Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука 2016. 1 (3): 11–25 RARE SPECIES OF SHIELD-HEAD VIPERS IN THE CAUCASUS Boris S. Tuniyev Sochi National Park, Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received: 03.10.2016 An overview is presented on shield-head vipers of the genus Pelias distributed in the post-Soviet countries of the Caucasian Ecoregion. The assessment presents the current conservation status and recommendations to vipers’ ter- ritorial protection. Key words: Caucasian Ecoregion, shield-head vipers, current status, protection. Introduction The Caucasian Ecoregion (the territory south- to-landscape descriptions (Tunieyv B.S. et al., 2009; ward from the Kuma-Manych depression to north- Tuniyev S.B. et al., 2012, 2014). The stationary works eastern Turkey and northwestern Iran) is the centre (mostly on the territory of the Caucasian State Nature of taxonomic diversity of shield-head vipers within Biosphere reserve and Sochi National Park) conducted the genus Pelias Merrem, 1820, of which 13–18 a study of the microclimatic features of vipers’ habitats species are found here. Without exception, all spe- including temperature and humidity modes of air and cies have a status of the different categories of rare- the upper soil horizon. The results were compared with ness, they are included on the IUCN Red list, or in thermobiological characteristics of the animals (Tuni- the current and upcoming publication of National yev B.S. & Unanian, 1986; Tuniyev B.S. & Volčik, and Regional Red Data Books. Besides the shield- 1995). In a number of cases difficult to determine the head vipers the Caucasian Ecoregion inhabit three taxonomic affiliation, in addition to the classical meth- representatives of mountain vipers of the genus ods of animal morphology and statistics, biochemistry Montivipera Nilson, Tuniyev, Andren, Orlov, Joger and molecular-genetic analysis methods have been ap- & Herrman, 1999 (M.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO Guidance on Management of Snakebites
    GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SNAKEBITES 2nd Edition GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SNAKEBITES 2nd Edition 1. 2. 3. 4. ISBN 978-92-9022- © World Health Organization 2016 2nd Edition All rights reserved. Requests for publications, or for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications, whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution, can be obtained from Publishing and Sales, World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, Indraprastha Estate, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110 002, India (fax: +91-11-23370197; e-mail: publications@ searo.who.int). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade in Live Reptiles, Its Impact on Wild Populations, and the Role of the European Market
    BIOC-06813; No of Pages 17 Biological Conservation xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bioc Review Trade in live reptiles, its impact on wild populations, and the role of the European market Mark Auliya a,⁎,SandraAltherrb, Daniel Ariano-Sanchez c, Ernst H. Baard d,CarlBrownd,RafeM.Browne, Juan-Carlos Cantu f,GabrieleGentileg, Paul Gildenhuys d, Evert Henningheim h, Jürgen Hintzmann i, Kahoru Kanari j, Milivoje Krvavac k, Marieke Lettink l, Jörg Lippert m, Luca Luiselli n,o, Göran Nilson p, Truong Quang Nguyen q, Vincent Nijman r, James F. Parham s, Stesha A. Pasachnik t,MiguelPedronou, Anna Rauhaus v,DannyRuedaCórdovaw, Maria-Elena Sanchez x,UlrichScheppy, Mona van Schingen z,v, Norbert Schneeweiss aa, Gabriel H. Segniagbeto ab, Ruchira Somaweera ac, Emerson Y. Sy ad,OguzTürkozanae, Sabine Vinke af, Thomas Vinke af,RajuVyasag, Stuart Williamson ah,1,ThomasZieglerai,aj a Department Conservation Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Conservation (UFZ), Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany b Pro Wildlife, Kidlerstrasse 2, 81371 Munich, Germany c Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle de, Guatemala d Western Cape Nature Conservation Board, South Africa e Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA f Bosques de Cerezos 112, C.P. 11700 México D.F., Mexico g Dipartimento di Biologia, Universitá Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy h Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    [Show full text]
  • Hidupan Liar Putrajaya 2019 Jabatan Perlindungan Hidupan Liar Dan Taman Negara Semenanjung Malaysia Mac-Mei 2019
    UNTUK KAJIAN BIODIVERSITI BANDAR DI PUTRAJAYA LAPORAN INVENTORI HIDUPAN LIAR PUTRAJAYA 2019 JABATAN PERLINDUNGAN HIDUPAN LIAR DAN TAMAN NEGARA SEMENANJUNG MALAYSIA MAC-MEI 2019 RUMUSAN Pengenalan satu siri program inventori hidupan liar telah dijalankan di Putrajaya pada Mac- Mei 2019 dengan bertujuan mengemaskini profil hidupan liar untuk perancangan dan pengurusan hidupan liar di Putrajaya demi kesejahteraan dan konservasi biodiversiti bandar Putrajaya dan penduduk setempatnya. Methodologi Cara pencerapan mengikut SOP dan Manual Inventori PERHILITAN: i. pemerhatian secara langsung dan tidak langsung (sounds, signs & footprints); ii. aktiviti pencarian aktif; iii. pemasangan perangkap mengikut sasaran kumpulan; iv. pengumpulan data sekunder melalui perbualan dengan warga setempat. Perangkap mamalia yang digunakan termasuklah harp trap, mist net, sangkar perangkap dan perangkap kamera; perangkap jaring dan sangkar perangkap bagi reptilia dan pitfall untuk amfibia. Hasil Sebanyak 23 spesies mamalia, 99 spesies burung, 8 spesies reptilia dan 7 spesies katak telah direkod untuk kajian ini, di mana 12 spesies mamalia, 39 spesies burung dan 2 spesies reptilia adalah rekod baru untuk Putrajaya. Penemuan ini menjadikan senarai semak hidupan liar Putrajaya telah meningkat kepada 37 spesies untuk mamalia; 142 spesies untuk burung; 19 spesies untuk reptilia dan 14 spesies untuk katak. Perbincangan Belukar di tepi jalan merupakan habitat utama bagi mamalia (55% - non-volan dan 31% - volan). Bulan April adalah musim pembiakan untuk spesies kelawar buah (Pteropodidae) di Putrajaya (mengandung – 19.0%; menyusu – 21.4%). Pemakanan hidupan liar yang mengamalkan frugivorous atau omnivorous di Putrajaya amat bergantung kepada kelapa sawit termasuk kelawar buah, burung residen dan burung hijrah pada waktu bukan musim berbuah. Penemuan kesan kelongsong peluru, jerat dan aktiviti memburu di bahagian selatan Putrajaya (Presint 5 dan 20) menunjukkan bahawa kawasan ini telah menjadi ‘hot spot’ pemburuan haram bagi spesies ayam hutan.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles of Phetchaburi Province, Western Thailand: a List of Species, with Natural History Notes, and a Discussion on the Biogeography at the Isthmus of Kra
    The Natural History Journal of Chulalongkorn University 3(1): 23-53, April 2003 ©2003 by Chulalongkorn University Reptiles of Phetchaburi Province, Western Thailand: a list of species, with natural history notes, and a discussion on the biogeography at the Isthmus of Kra OLIVIER S.G. PAUWELS 1*, PATRICK DAVID 2, CHUCHEEP CHIMSUNCHART 3 AND KUMTHORN THIRAKHUPT 4 1 Department of Recent Vertebrates, Institut Royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, 29 rue Vautier, 1000 Brussels, BELGIUM 2 UMS 602 Taxinomie-collection – Reptiles & Amphibiens, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 25 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, FRANCE 3 65 Moo 1, Tumbon Tumlu, Amphoe Ban Lat, Phetchaburi 76150, THAILAND 4 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, THAILAND ABSTRACT.–A study of herpetological biodiversity was conducted in Phetcha- buri Province, in the upper part of peninsular Thailand. On the basis of a review of available literature, original field observations and examination of museum collections, a preliminary list of 81 species (12 chelonians, 2 crocodiles, 23 lizards, and 44 snakes) is established, of which 52 (64 %) are reported from the province for the first time. The possible presence of additional species is discussed. Some biological data on the new specimens are provided including some range extensions and new size records. The herpetofauna of Phetchaburi shows strong Sundaic affinities, with about 88 % of the recorded species being also found south of the Isthmus of Kra. A biogeographic affinity analysis suggests that the Isthmus of Kra plays the role of a biogeographic filter, due both to the repeated changes in climate during the Quaternary and to the current increase of the dry season duration along the peninsula from south to north.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List of the European Herpetofauna
    Species list of the European herpetofauna – 2020 update by the Taxonomic Committee of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica Jeroen Speybroeck, Wouter Beukema, Christophe Dufresnes, Uwe Fritz, Daniel Jablonski, Petros Lymberakis, Iñigo Martínez-Solano, Edoardo Razzetti, Melita Vamberger, Miguel Vences, et al. To cite this version: Jeroen Speybroeck, Wouter Beukema, Christophe Dufresnes, Uwe Fritz, Daniel Jablonski, et al.. Species list of the European herpetofauna – 2020 update by the Taxonomic Committee of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica. Amphibia-Reptilia, Brill Academic Publishers, 2020, 41 (2), pp.139-189. 10.1163/15685381-bja10010. hal-03098691 HAL Id: hal-03098691 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03098691 Submitted on 5 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Amphibia-Reptilia 41 (2020): 139-189 brill.com/amre Review Species list of the European herpetofauna – 2020 update by the Taxonomic Committee of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica Jeroen Speybroeck1,∗, Wouter Beukema2, Christophe Dufresnes3, Uwe Fritz4, Daniel Jablonski5, Petros Lymberakis6, Iñigo Martínez-Solano7, Edoardo Razzetti8, Melita Vamberger4, Miguel Vences9, Judit Vörös10, Pierre-André Crochet11 Abstract. The last species list of the European herpetofauna was published by Speybroeck, Beukema and Crochet (2010). In the meantime, ongoing research led to numerous taxonomic changes, including the discovery of new species-level lineages as well as reclassifications at genus level, requiring significant changes to this list.
    [Show full text]
  • A Division of the African Tree Viper Genus Atheris Cope, 1860 Into Four Subgenera (Serpentes:Viperidae)
    32 Australasian Journal of Herpetology Australasian Journal of Herpetology 12:32-35. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) Published 30 April 2012. A division of the African Tree Viper genus Atheris Cope, 1860 into four subgenera (Serpentes:Viperidae). Raymond T. Hoser 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3114, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: [email protected] Received 15 February 2012, Accepted 2 April 2012, Published 30 April 2012. ABSTRACT The African Tree Viper genus Atheris has been of interest to taxonomists in recent years. Significant was the removal of the species superciliaris to the newly created monotypic genus Proatheris and the species hindii to the monotypic genus Montatheris both by Broadley in 1996 gaining widespread acceptance. Marx and Rabb (1965), erected a monotypic genus Adenorhinos for the species barbouri, but this designation has not gained widespread support from other herpetologists, with a number of recent classifications continuing to place the taxon within Atheris (e.g. Menegon et. al. 2011). Phylogenetic studies of the genus Atheris senso lato using molecular methods (e.g. Pyron et. al. 2011) have upheld the validity of the creation of the monotypic genera Proatheris and Montatheris by Broadley. These studies have also shown there to be at least four well-defined groups of species within the genus Atheris as recognized in early 2012, though not as divergent as seen for the snakes placed within Proatheris and Montatheris. As a result, the genus is now subdivided into subgenera using available names for three, with the fourth one being named Woolfvipera subgen.
    [Show full text]
  • Venomous Nonvenomous Snakes of Florida
    Venomous and nonvenomous Snakes of Florida PHOTOGRAPHS BY KEVIN ENGE Top to bottom: Black swamp snake; Eastern garter snake; Eastern mud snake; Eastern kingsnake Florida is home to more snakes than any other state in the Southeast – 44 native species and three nonnative species. Since only six species are venomous, and two of those reside only in the northern part of the state, any snake you encounter will most likely be nonvenomous. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission MyFWC.com Florida has an abundance of wildlife, Snakes flick their forked tongues to “taste” their surroundings. The tongue of this yellow rat snake including a wide variety of reptiles. takes particles from the air into the Jacobson’s This state has more snakes than organs in the roof of its mouth for identification. any other state in the Southeast – 44 native species and three nonnative species. They are found in every Fhabitat from coastal mangroves and salt marshes to freshwater wetlands and dry uplands. Some species even thrive in residential areas. Anyone in Florida might see a snake wherever they live or travel. Many people are frightened of or repulsed by snakes because of super- stition or folklore. In reality, snakes play an interesting and vital role K in Florida’s complex ecology. Many ENNETH L. species help reduce the populations of rodents and other pests. K Since only six of Florida’s resident RYSKO snake species are venomous and two of them reside only in the northern and reflective and are frequently iri- part of the state, any snake you en- descent.
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Change in South East Asian Trawl Fisheries, Fishmeal Supply, And
    Driving change in South East Asian trawl fisheries, fishmeal supply, and aquafeed Report to IFFO, The Marine Ingredients Organisation and the Global Aquaculture Alliance (GAA) by Duncan Leadbitter Director Fish Matter Pty Ltd August, 2019 1 About the Project sponsors IFFO, The Marine Ingredients Organisation IFFO represents the marine ingredients industry worldwide. IFFO’s members reside in more than 50 countries, account for over 50% of world production and 75% of the fishmeal and fish oil traded worldwide. Approximately 5 million tonnes of fishmeal are produced each year globally, together with 1 million tonnes of fish oil. IFFO’s headquarters are located in London in the United Kingdom and it also has offices in Lima, Peru, and in Beijing, China. IFFO is an accredited Observer to the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO). To find out more, visit www.iffo.net. The Global Aquaculture Alliance (GAA) The Global Aquaculture Alliance is an international, non-profit trade association dedicated to advancing environmentally and socially responsible aquaculture. Through the development of its Best Aquaculture Practices certification standards, GAA has become the leading standards-setting organization for aquaculture seafood. To find out more, visit https://www.aquaculturealliance.org/ 2 Executive Summary Information is generally lacking about South East Asian (SEA) fisheries in terms of their biology, fishing practices, and environmental impact, as well as their contributions for social (e.g. employment, food security implications), or economic (e.g. value, trade dynamics) factors. Some social and fisheries management issues are well known and attract criticism right across the fisheries, fishmeal/oil, aquafeed, aquaculture, seafood and retail sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Biolphilately Vol-64 No-3
    Vol. 67 (1) Biophilately March 2018 57 HERPETOLOGY Associate Editor Dick Roman, LM83 New Listings [Ed. Note: Occasionally in this section and also in the Fungi section, we will note a species that is known to be poisonous or venomous by marking it with a () symbol. One should not infer that other species that are not so marked are non-poisonous or non-venomous or safe to handle/eat.] Scott# Denom Common Name/Scientific Name Family/Subfamily Code ANTIGUA 2016 May 25 (Reptiles) (MS/6, MS/4, & SS/1) 3331a $3.15 Royal Python, Python regius Pythonidae A 3331b $3.15 White-lipped Pit Viper, Trimeresurus albolabris () Viperidae, Crotalinae A 3331c $3.15 Leatherback Sea Turtle, Dermochelys coriacea Dermochelyidae A 3331d $3.15 Green Sea Turtle, Chelonia mydas Cheloniidae A 3331e $3.15 Spectacled Caiman, Caiman crocodilus Alligatoridae A 3331f $3.15 American Crocodile. Crocodylus acutus Crocodylidae A 3332a $3.25 Green Anole, Anolis carolinensis Dactyloidae A 3332b $3.25 Yellow-headed Dwarf Gecko, Lygodactylus luteopicturatus Gekkonidae A 3332c $3.25 Little Striped Whiptail, Aspidoscelis inornata Teiidae A 3332d $3.25 Giant Girdled Lizard, Smaug giganteus Cordylidae A 3333 SS $10 Reunion (or Panther) Chameleon, Furcifer pardalis Chamaeleonidae A 2017 August 1 (Hawksbill Sea Turtle) (2ea MS/4) 3381a $7 Hawksbill Sea Turtle, Eretmochelys imbricata (in reef) Cheloniidae A 3381b $7 Same species (on reef facing R & up) A 3381c $7 Same species (facing front) A 3381d $7 Same species (swimming R) A 3381 Margin L: Same species (swimming R & up) Z 3382a $7
    [Show full text]
  • Calibrating the Tree of Vipers Under the Fossilized Birth-Death Model Jiří Šmíd 1,2,3,4 & Krystal A
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Calibrating the tree of vipers under the fossilized birth-death model Jiří Šmíd 1,2,3,4 & Krystal A. Tolley 1,5 Scaling evolutionary trees to time is essential for understanding the origins of clades. Recently Received: 18 September 2018 developed methods allow including the entire fossil record known for the group of interest and Accepted: 15 February 2019 eliminated the need for specifying prior distributions for node ages. Here we apply the fossilized birth- Published: xx xx xxxx death (FBD) approach to reconstruct the diversifcation timeline of the viperines (subfamily Viperinae). Viperinae are an Old World snake subfamily comprising 102 species from 13 genera. The fossil record of vipers is fairly rich and well assignable to clades due to the unique vertebral and fang morphology. We use an unprecedented sampling of 83 modern species and 13 genetic markers in combination with 197 fossils representing 28 extinct taxa to reconstruct a time-calibrated phylogeny of the Viperinae. Our results suggest a late Eocene-early Oligocene origin with several diversifcation events following soon after the group’s establishment. The age estimates inferred with the FBD model correspond to those from previous studies that were based on node dating but FBD provides notably narrower credible intervals around the node ages. Viperines comprise two African and an Eurasian clade, but the ancestral origin of the subfamily is ambiguous. The most parsimonious scenarios require two transoceanic dispersals over the Tethys Sea during the Oligocene. Scaling phylogenetic trees to time is one of the major challenges in evolutionary biology. Reliable estimates for the age of evolutionary events are essential for addressing a wide array of questions, such as deciphering micro- and macroevolutionary processes, identifying drivers of biodiversity patterns, or understanding the origins of life1.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics, Distribution and Ecology of the Snakes of Jordan
    Vertebrate Zoology 61 (2) 2011 179 179 – 266 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, ISSN 1864-5755, 25.10.2011 Systematics, distribution and ecology of the snakes of Jordan ZUHAIR S. AMR 1 & AHMAD M. DISI 2 1 Department of Biology, Jordan University of Science & Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, 11112, Jordan. amrz(at)just.edu.jo 2 Department of Biology, the University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan. ahmadmdisi(at)yahoo.com Accepted on June 18, 2011. Published online at www.vertebrate-zoology.de on June 22, 2011. > Abstract The present study consists of both locality records and of literary data for 37 species and subspecies of snakes reported from Jordan. Within the past decade snake taxonomy was re-evaluated employing molecular techniques that resulted in reconsideration of several taxa. Thus, it is imperative now to revise the taxonomic status of snakes in Jordan to update workers in Jordan and the surrounding countries with these nomenclatural changes. The snake fauna of Jordan consists of 37 species and subspecies belonging to seven families (Typhlopidae, Leptotyphlopidae, Boidae, Colubridae, Atractaspididae, Elapidae and Viperidae). Families Leptotyphlopidae, Boidae and Elapidae are represented by a single species each, Leptotyphlops macrorhynchus, Eryx jaculus and Walterinnesia aegyptia respectively. The families Typhlopidae and Atractaspididae are represented by two and three species respectively. Species of the former genus Coluber were updated and the newly adopted names are included. Family Colubridae is represented by twelve genera (Dolichophis, Eirenis, Hemorrhois, Lytorhynchus, Malpolon, Natrix, Platyceps, Psammophis, Rhagerhis, Rhynchocalamus, Spalerosophis and Telescopus) and includes 24 species. Family Viperidae includes fi ve genera (Cerastes, Daboia, Echis, Macrovipera and Pseudocerastes), each of which is represented by a single species, except the genus Cerastes which is represented by two subspecies.
    [Show full text]