Introduction to Managing Blackdown Hills
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sediment Yields in the Exe Basin: a Longer-Term Perspective
Sediment Dynamics and the Hydromorphology of Fluvial Systems (Proceedings of a symposium held in 12 Dundee, UK, July 2006). IAHS Publ. 306, 2006. Sediment yields in the Exe Basin: a longer-term perspective ANNA HARLOW, BRUCE WEBB & DES WALLING School of Geography, Archaeology and Earth Resources, Department of Geography, Amory Building, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK [email protected] Abstract In the UK, fine sediment is viewed increasingly as a diffuse pollu- tant due to its role as a vector for the transport of potential contaminants, and in causing siltation, which may have adverse effects on river and estuarine habitats. There is a need, therefore, for river managers to have reliable information on sediment budgets in order to plan measures that will achieve “good” status under the EU Water Framework Directive. As part of a wider sediment-budget investigation in the EU-funded Cycleau Project, detailed records of fine sediment yield over the 10-year period from 1994–2003 have been analysed for the Exe Basin (1500 km2), a principal river system of southwest England. The longer-term average yields in the three major tributaries of the Exe Basin are discussed and results of monitoring of sediment loads at a site near the tidal limit over a one-year period confirm the importance of the River Exe in contributing sediment to the Estuary. Key words diffuse pollution; Exe Basin and estuary; longer-term behaviour; suspended sediment yields INTRODUCTION River systems provide a key pathway along which fine sediment (silt and clay particles of <63 µm in diameter) is transferred from the terrestrial to the estuarine environment. -
SOMERSET OPEN STUDIOS 2016 17 SEPTEMBER - 2 OCTOBER SOS GUIDE 2016 COVER Half Page (Wide) Ads 11/07/2016 09:56 Page 2
SOS_GUIDE_2016_COVER_Half Page (Wide) Ads 11/07/2016 09:56 Page 1 SOMERSET OPEN STUDIOS 2016 17 SEPTEMBER - 2 OCTOBER SOS_GUIDE_2016_COVER_Half Page (Wide) Ads 11/07/2016 09:56 Page 2 Somerset Open Studios is a much-loved and thriving event and I’m proud to support it. It plays an invaluable role in identifying and celebrating a huge variety of creative activities and projects in this county, finding emerging artists and raising awareness of them. I urge you to go out and enjoy these glorious weeks of cultural exploration. Kevin McCloud Photo: Glenn Dearing “What a fantastic creative county we all live in!” Michael Eavis www.somersetartworks.org.uk SOMERSET OPEN STUDIOS #SomersetOpenStudios16 SOS_GUIDE_2016_SB[2]_saw_guide 11/07/2016 09:58 Page 1 WELCOME TO OUR FESTIVAL! About Somerset Art Works Somerset Open Studios is back again! This year we have 208 venues and nearly 300 artists participating, Placing art at the heart of Somerset, showing a huge variety of work. Artists from every investing in the arts community, enriching lives. background and discipline will open up their studios - places that are usually private working environments, SAW is an artist-led organisation and what a privilege to be allowed in! Somerset’s only countywide agency dedicated to developing visual arts, Each year, Somerset Open Studios also works with weaving together communities and individuals, organisations and schools to develop the supporting the artists who enrich our event. We are delighted to work with King’s School lives. We want Somerset to be a Bruton and Bruton School for Girls to offer new and place where people expect to exciting work from a growing generation of artistic engage with excellent visual art that talent. -
Somerset Parish Map CC
Shipham Norton St. TellisfordPhilip Brean Compton Lympsham Bishop Stome Rode Priddy Litton Hemington Axbridge Easton Badgworth Cheddar Berrow Brent East Kilmersdon Lullington Brent Beckington Knoll Weare Chewton Mendip Buckland Dinham Burnham-on-Sea Chilcompton Chapel Coleford Great Berkley Allerton Holcombe Elm EmboroughBinegar Stratton on the Fosse Mells Burnham Rodney Stoke without Minehead without Ashwick Leigh Westbury -on- Frome Stoke Mendip Selworthy Mark Wedmore St Michael Whately West Wookey Wells Downhead Nunney Oare Porlock Huntspill Selwood MINEHEAD East Huntspill Trudoxhill Crosscombe Shepton Doulting Stringston Stogursey Godney St. Cuthberts Out Mallet Cranmore Burtle Wanstrow Wootton East Kilve Pawlett Woolavington Quantoxhead Otterhampton Luccombe Courtenay Dunster Watchet Stockland Bristol Puriton Meare North Wootton Carhampton Old Williton Pilton Cleeve West Fiddington Witham Friary Cossington Timberscombe Quantoxhead Nether Cannington Batcombe Withycombe Holford Stowey Bawdrip Chilton Polden Edington Bridgwater without West Pylle Samford Brett Chitton Catcott Shapwick Glastonbury Evercreech Exmoor Cutcombe Trinity Pennard Upton Noble Exford Bicknoller Sharpham Wembdon East Luxborough Over Stawell Pennard Milton Clevedon Monksilver Stowey Chedzoy West Bradley Nethercombe Spaxton Durleigh Bridgwater Ashcott Street Stogumber Crowcombe Moorlinch Brewham Treborough Baltonsborough Ditcheat Lamyatt Bruton Enmore Walton Bagborough Greinton West West Winsford Goathurst Westonzoyland Butleigh Exton Elworthy Bradley Withypool -
First Annual Review of The
FIRST ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE RIVER EXE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (1997) Key Sites Relating to Issues in the River Exc Annual Review Bridgwater : a ay i: -: WheddotV:Ctoss:3&i Information corrcct as of Oct 1997 River lixc Calchmcnl Management I’lan O Crown Copyright ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 1‘nvtronmcfU Agcncy South West kcpron II II lllllll II 125080 SOUTHWEST REGION RIVER EXE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN - ACTION PLAN - FIRST ANNUAL REVIEW Con ten ts: ..................................................................................................................................................... Y.........................................Page N o O ur V ision O f The Ca tc h m en t....................................................................................................................................................................2 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................3 1.1 The Environm ent Ag en c y ....................................................................................................................................................................3 1.2 The Environm ent Planning Pr o c e ss..............................................................................................................................................4 1.3 T he Catchm ent steerin g G r o u p.......................................................................................................................................................4 -
WM WAMBROOK 1881 Census.Cwk (WP)
PARISH OF WAMBROOK 1881 CENSUS RG11/2385 The census was carried out on the night of 3rd April 1881 and closely followed the format of the previous censuses taken between 1851 and 1871. The head of the family had to be defined as did the relationship to the head of each person staying in the house that night. The gender of each person was also recorded. Accurate ages were required throughout and were taken from the person’s last birthday. For infants under one year, the age was recorded either in months (m), weeks (w) or days (d). The rank, profession or occupation of each person was recorded and “Where Born” had to be completed by giving the county and town or parish of birth. An analysis of the recordings for Wambrook is tabled below: Age Group Under 10 68 25.8% 10 to 19 61 23.2% 20 to 29 26 9.9% 30 to 39 41 15.6% 40 to 49 19 7.2% 50 to 59 17 6.5% 60 to 69 22 8.4% 70 to 79 6 2.3% Over 80 3 1.1% Total 263 The census recorded 140 males (53.2% of total) and 123 females (46.8%) There were 48 occupied dwellings, which produced an average of 5.5 persons per dwelling. One uninhabited dwelling was recorded at Higher Wambrook. The transcript was made by members of CHRG from copies of the original documents. When extracting information from this transcript, the following points should be noted: * In 1881 Wambrook formed part of the County of Dorset, as the transfer to Somerset did not occur until 1896. -
Black's Guide to Devonshire
$PI|c>y » ^ EXETt R : STOI Lundrvl.^ I y. fCamelford x Ho Town 24j Tfe<n i/ lisbeard-- 9 5 =553 v 'Suuiland,ntjuUffl " < t,,, w;, #j A~ 15 g -- - •$3*^:y&« . Pui l,i<fkl-W>«? uoi- "'"/;< errtland I . V. ',,, {BabburomheBay 109 f ^Torquaylll • 4 TorBa,, x L > \ * Vj I N DEX MAP TO ACCOMPANY BLACKS GriDE T'i c Q V\ kk&et, ii £FC Sote . 77f/? numbers after the names refer to the page in GuidcBook where die- description is to be found.. Hack Edinburgh. BEQUEST OF REV. CANON SCADDING. D. D. TORONTO. 1901. BLACK'S GUIDE TO DEVONSHIRE. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/blacksguidetodevOOedin *&,* BLACK'S GUIDE TO DEVONSHIRE TENTH EDITION miti) fffaps an* Hlustrations ^ . P, EDINBURGH ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK 1879 CLUE INDEX TO THE CHIEF PLACES IN DEVONSHIRE. For General Index see Page 285. Axniinster, 160. Hfracombe, 152. Babbicombe, 109. Kent Hole, 113. Barnstaple, 209. Kingswear, 119. Berry Pomeroy, 269. Lydford, 226. Bideford, 147. Lynmouth, 155. Bridge-water, 277. Lynton, 156. Brixham, 115. Moreton Hampstead, 250. Buckfastleigh, 263. Xewton Abbot, 270. Bude Haven, 223. Okehampton, 203. Budleigh-Salterton, 170. Paignton, 114. Chudleigh, 268. Plymouth, 121. Cock's Tor, 248. Plympton, 143. Dartmoor, 242. Saltash, 142. Dartmouth, 117. Sidmouth, 99. Dart River, 116. Tamar, River, 273. ' Dawlish, 106. Taunton, 277. Devonport, 133. Tavistock, 230. Eddystone Lighthouse, 138. Tavy, 238. Exe, The, 190. Teignmouth, 107. Exeter, 173. Tiverton, 195. Exmoor Forest, 159. Torquay, 111. Exmouth, 101. Totnes, 260. Harewood House, 233. Ugbrooke, 10P. -
East Midlands Derbyshire
Archaeological Investigations Project 2004 Geophysical Investigations East Midlands Derbyshire South Derbyshire 7 /1 (H.17.S002) SK 21031756 DE12 8LZ LAND AT WALTON-ON-TRENT A Geophysical Survey on Land at Walton-upon-Trent, Derbyshire Butler, A & Fisher, I Northampton : Northamptonshire Archaeology, 2004, 10pp, figs, refs Work undertaken by: Northamptonshire Archaeology Geophysical prospection was carried out comprising a detailed earth resistance survey and a magnetometer survey of c. 2 ha of land on earthworks. The resistance survey confirmed the earthwork banks and ditches that were apparent on the ground and in addition showed some anomalies that were not visible on the surface. A detailed magnetometer survey was carried out over the same area and provided little new information, possibly due to peculiarities of the local geofluvial substrate. [Au(adp)] Archaeological periods represented: UD 7 /2 (H.17.S001) SK 28302790 DE65 6BW WILLINGTON Geophysical Survey Report. Willington, Derbyshire Donaldson, K Upton-upon-Severn : Stratascan, 2004, 36pp, figs Work undertaken by: Stratascan A detailed magnetic survey was conducted over 12.5 ha of agricultural land and detected a number of geophysical anomalies within the site. Positive linear anomalies within the south-west corner of the site may have represented an extension to archaeological features previously identified during excavations. Several linear and curvilinear anomalies within the eastern half of the site may also have indicated the presence of a subcircular enclosure with internal and external ring ditch features. A positive linear anomaly extending across the centre of the site from north to south corresponded to the location of a parish boundary. Several other positive anomalies also corresponded to the location of drains and ditches and indicated former land divisions. -
The GESP Draft Policies and Site Options Consultation Document
The GESP Draft Policies and Site Options Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal Report Final Report Prepared by LUC June 2020 Project Title: Sustainability Appraisal of the Greater Exeter Strategic Plan Client: East Devon District, Exeter City, Mid Devon District, and Teignbridge District Councils Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 11/05/2020 Draft SA Report for Kieran Moroney Kate Nicholls Taran Greater Exeter Natalie Collins Livingston Strategic Plan: Draft Harry Briggs Policies and Site Kate Nicholls Options Consultation document 2 25/05/2020 Final SA Report for Kieran Moroney Kate Nicholls Taran Greater Exeter Natalie Collins Livingston Strategic Plan: Draft Harry Briggs Policies and Site Kate Nicholls Options Consultation document 3 01/06/2020 Updated Final SA Kieran Moroney Kate Nicholls Taran Report for Greater Natalie Collins Livingston Exeter Strategic Plan: Harry Briggs Draft Policies and Site Kate Nicholls Options Consultation document The GESP Draft Policies and Site Options Consultation document Sustainability Appraisal Report Final Report Prepared by LUC June 2020 Planning & EIA LUC BRISTOL Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd th Registered in England Design 12 Floor Colston Tower London Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning Colston Street Bristol Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management BS1 4XE Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)117 929 1997 London NW1 1JD Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Contents -
Devon Area Report
/vj(V\ SuVfh \°\ % NRA National Rivers Authority South Western Region DEVON AREA REPORT River Culm Fisheries Survey 1994 February 1995 DEV/FRCJ06/95 Author: J Goodwill Senior Fisheries Technician G R Bateman Area Manager (Devon) CONTENTS 1) INTRODUCTION 2) METHODS 2.1 Site Clustering 2.2 Fieldwork 3) RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Salmon 3.2 Trout 3.3 Other Species 4) CONCLUSIONS 5) RECOMMENDATIONS 6) APPENDIX A - RESULTS ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 130095 RIVER CULM FISHERIES SURVEY 1994 1) INTRODUCTION A survey of the populations of freshwater fish at selected sites in the Culm river system was carried out in June and July 1994. The aim of the survey was to assess the distribution and abundance of freshwater fish and to compare with results of previous surveys where possible. Comprehensive surveys of the Culm system have been carried out in 1981 (Hamilton) and 1989. Limited surveys have been carried out in 1977, 1978, 1982, 1984 and 1987. For a brief description of the catchment see Hamilton (1981). 2) METHODS A total of twenty six sites were chosen throughout the catchment. Twenty-four .sites-were- - surveyed quantitatively, the remaining two, semi-quantitatively. Site selection was based upon physical accessibility, geographical distribution and habitat characteristics. Site distribution and locations are shown in Figure 1. Site details are given in Table 1. 2.1 Site Clustering Since 1992, routine sampling has included single-run sites in addition to three-run sites. Sites are clustered on a ' target area' basis r one three-run site is associated with up to four single-run sites. A typical' cluster' will consist of five sites. -
Somerset. Ilminster
DIRECTORY. J SOMERSET. ILMINSTER. 297 25 acres, and is the residence of Herbert Hutchings The whole population of the ecclesiastical parish in Shepherd esq. J.P. The soil is partly sandy loam a.nd rgu was 3,290 (which includes part of llminster With gravelly clay, very fruitful, and comprise! arable, out civil parish); acreage, 3,929. meadow, pasture and orchard land. The hamlets are :-Sea, 1 mile south ; Crock Street, 3 The area of Ilminster civil parish and Urban District west; Peasmarsh, 2 south; Horton, I! west; Winterl>ay, is 531 acres; rateable value, £9,891; the population in half mile north-west; Higher Horton, 3 west ; .Ashwell, I 19n was 2,467. · north; and Dillington, ~~ north-east; divided into the The area of ILMINSTER WITHf'~T is 3·535 acres of following tit.bings :-Church, Town, Winterhay, Horton land and 13 of water; rateable value, £7,920; the popu and Hilcombe. lation in I9II was 823. OFFICI.A.L ESTABLISHMENTS. LOCAL INSTITUTIONS &c. Post, M. 0., T. & Telephonic Express Delivery Office petty sessional division :-Ashill, Barrington, Beercro (letters should have Somerset added).-George Barker, combe, Broadway, Buckland St. Mary, Chard, Chaff sub-postmaster. No sunday delivery or dispatch. combe, Chillington, Combe St. Nicholas, Cudworth, Office open for sale of stamps from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. ; Cricket St. Thomas, Cricket Malherbie, Curry Mallett, Donyatt, Dowlish Wake, Dinnington, Ilminster, Ilmin sun days, 8.30 to 10 a.m. Sale of postal orders, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Money order business, payment of ster (Without), Ilton, Isle Abbotts, Isle Brewers, postal orders & issue of licenses, 9 a.m. -
The Evolution of the Rivers of East Devon and South Somerset, UK
R.W. Gallois THE EVOLUTION OF THE RIVERS OF EAST DEVON AND SOUTH SOMERSET , UK R.W.G ALLOIS Gallois, R.W. 2006. The evolution of the rivers of east Devon and south Somerset, UK. Geoscience in south-west England, 11 , 205-213. With the exception of the River Tone, which appears to have been separated at an early stage from its neighbours to the south by a major fault, the rivers of south Somerset and east Devon were initiated on a southward dipping Tertiary planation surface. The evolutionary histories of the present-day catchments of the rivers Exe and Otter are complex and inter-related. Those of the adjacent Axe and Teign appear to be less complex and may have evolved relatively independently from the Exe-Otter system. The differences in the histories of the catchments are most clearly demonstrated by their terrace systems. The Exe-Otter catchment has 10 or more terrace levels at heights of up to 140 m above the modern floodplain. In contrast, the Axe, Teign and Tone catchments contain only one or two terrace levels all of which are less than 20 m above the present-day valley floor. The explanation suggested here for the difference involves a sequence of river captures that changed the forerunner of the present-day Otter from a major river capable of producing a 3-km wide gravelly braidplain into a minor stream. 92 Stoke Valley Road, Exeter, EX4 5ER, U.K. (E-mail: [email protected]). INTRODUCTION The middle and lower reaches of the River Exe and the There are too few age data to determine the period of time adjacent catchments of the Axe, Otter, Teign and Tone drain an during which the terrace sequences in south-west England area with a complex topographical relief that ranges from over evolved, but comparison with the denudation chronology of 300 m above Ordnance Datum (O.D.) in the Blackdown Hills southern England as a whole suggests that all the terraces to a few metres above O.D. -
Display PDF in Separate
N f ^ S olMV> UJjmt 2.18 Environmental Protection Internal Report REGIONAL WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMME FOR 1992 IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF EFFLUENT DISCHARGES ON RECEIVING WATERS January 1992 FWS/92/010 Author: R Broome Freshwater Scientist NRA C.V.M. Davies National Rivers Authority Environmental Protection Manager South Wen Region LIST OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction to the 1992 Inpact Assessment Of Effluent Discharges on Receiving waters Programme. 2. Description of programme. 2.1 Sites monitored 2.2 1993 Programme 3. Programme information 4. Schedule Explanation 5. Endorsement 6. Schedule of Sampling and Analysis A p p e n d i x A environment a g e n c y 110036 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND SURVEILIANCE PROGRAMME FOR 1992 IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF EFFLUENT DISCHARGES ON RECEIVING WATERS TECHNICAL REPORT NUMBER FW5/92/010 SUMMARY The 1992 Impact Assessment of Effluent Discharges on Receiving Waters Programme evolved from a review of the existing 1991 programme, whose primary purpose was to provide data for the review of discharge consents, as result of the newly implemented Water Resources Act Consent register and the Charging for Discharges Scheme. This programme is integrated with the effluent discharge compliance assessment programme, Samples are taken not only of a significant discharge but also of the receiving water immediately upstream of the discharge and at the edge of the mixing zone downstream of the discharge. The 1992 programme has several purposes, such as: - identifying any impact by the discharge on the receiving waters. - characterising upstream water quality. - providing a database against which change can be measured.