DOCSLIB.ORG

AR TICLE ,Ghqwlfifdwlrq RI D QHZ RUGHU RI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AR TICLE ,Ghqwlfifdwlrq RI D QHZ RUGHU RI IMA FUNGUS · 6(1): 129–133 (2015) [!644"E\ 56!46F6!6# #"$"%"' ARTICLE Entorrhizomycota: Talbotiomycetales ord. nov. on eudicotyledons 2 !, + !2 5U 2 3U ; = 72X4 < + F !Z % V N S% S; S% S/ U !#56#FV ] K . [ ^ . 5V@ * > ; > >7#Z9Z2 3W / + N Z % ; G * Z % 9 [66E_; @ / 7@O N + ; / @ < U* O7F;*._!.4!52 ; 4] .+ .@ %4#56#FV ] FZ % +/]] Z % %!4677#E6+] Abstract: V Entorrhizomycota Key words: Entorrhiza . Cyperaceae JuncaceaeTalbotiomyces calosporus Entorrhiza incertae sedis Entorrhiza % % [ T. calosporus Entorrhizomycota <>/?Talbotiomyces %Entorrhiza $ + Talbotiomyces $ Entorrhiza Talbotiomyces within the Entorrhizomycota Entorrhiza Talbotiomyces V $ Entorrhizomycota Poales 9 $ Talbotiomycetales % Talbotiomycetaceae % Talbotiomyces Article info:@ [FU 56!4K/ [!FU 56!4K; [5FU 56!4 INTRODUCTION 56!556!_<%I<%56!5< Entorrhizomycota versus Entorrhiza + et al. 56!4 O Cyperaceae O % Juncaceae V \ % % % % @ Entorrhiza Fungi V % [ Tilletiaceae !"4_ N < [ . Entorrhiza W !"E6<IQ !"E! Entorrhizaceae, + et al.56!4Talbotiomyces Entorrhizales, Entorrhizomycetidae Entorrhizomycetes, Entorrhiza within the Ustilaginomycotina+ et al.!""#+ Entorrhiza calospora et al. !""E 566# + et al. 56!4 @ / that Entorrhiza CaryophyllalesXet al.566#] % ? % Talbotiomyces calosporus Entorrhizomycota 9% Entorrhiza Talbotiomyces Entorrhizomycota Dikarya, O Entorrhizomycota Ascomycota Basidiomycota, V <>/ + et al.56!4 T. calosporus !"7_ [% Entorrhizomycota Entorrhiza % Dikarya Entorrhiza !7 Glomeromycota Cyperaceae Juncaceae W !"#E X !""7 © 2015 International Mycological Association You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the following conditions: Attribution: [ Non-commercial: No derivative works: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work, which can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights. VOLUME 6 · NO. 1 129 Riess et al. MATERIALS AND METHODS [ ] % 6"! G 5666 % Material $ [Q Specimen examined[ Talbotiomyces calosporus[ South RV[ @@Z Africa: ] [ ; + U W !7"E *@Z 4!7 W ARTICLE Limeum viscosum L. glomeratum _6 ` !"7_ J.J.O. Pazzi+N;[ 9ZX 4E#M ;SU __##6 U $ M U* !666 ]VG/V DNA isolation, PCR, and sequencing /$U* % E6!# @ 56!7 / V <>/ $ N;S; ; <>/ 2 / ` ` + UGUG U + % R V @@Z <>/ _55? et al.56!5 ]V]S [ % 4&!6F >@! >@E et al. !""6 >@!# ; % >@57] IV !""5;G !66 [ 54&!6F ; 9 .W <>/ ; W O Q . V % X W . Talbotiomyces Entorrhiza were $ . ? 4G % _6 U? %5#4U IU 56!! V4a *@Z <>/ [ *6 X * [\\ \ \ \ RESULTS *F X I 9 !""6 ;G $ 4 )* ;G !6$ Phylogenetic placement of Talbotiomyces 6#4UUG546U!74)* !)*>V; V $4U646)* 54\)*654)* <>/?Talbotiomyces calosporus[% U Taq <>/ + * 5 Entorrhiza, % Z\)* 54 )* <>/ ;G Glomeromycota W ! N [[!6_6 % @@Z *@Z "7G74 F6G.!G #4 #5 W ! Entorrhiza G 5F_6 "7G74 46G Talbotiomyces #4 #5G [ $ # #5G;G V T. calosporus [ S$@/;.NVZ@+G ## 46z `[ G% Q9 ![56 G !E@ 4# "6z E. aschersoniana*@ZN ? @@Z *@Z <>/ % ![F + <V %_!G@? 2 Entorrhiza\Talbotiomyces / + W G G/ [ Dikarya ""zU* !66+ @? /+N ; W ! _!_6xl ] / / + W % ? @? % 7! ] TAXONOMY G G // UN V <>/ ? Talbotiomyces calosporus % Q Talbotiomyces calosporus ]+ EntorrhizomycotaU % 2`FFF!5"@@Z 2;7!_64F*@Z Entorrhiza Talbotiomyces Molecular phylogenetic analyses [ [ $ % V Talbotiomyces, % Talbotiomyces, <>/ @@Z *@Z Talbotiomyces ? + ? Entorrhizomycetes[ T. calosporus Entorrhiza? % ]+ % Talbotiomycetales 2 + 2 Glomeromycota W ! 2 ; = XI+ ord. nov. V Gromochytrium mamkaevae Olpidium U+ U+E!6#"# brassicae $ W ]+ V +/@S Diagnosis: U Entorrhizomycetes+ et al N< !#F67 / 566# % U/WWV % #!7# 2 I @ 56!_ S.N>@. 2 et al. 5664. N Type[TalbotiomycesXet al.566# 130 IMA FUNGUS Talbotiomycetales ord. nov. (Entorrhizomycota) ARTICLE ½½¾ *$" ½¾ ½½¾ !" ½½¾ ¿ ¿ ~ ½½¾ $) ½½¾ ½½¾ !" ¡~ ½½¾ ½¾ +0''12 À¾À ~ ½¾ ½½¾ ½½¾ !" ½¾ !"#$%"$&'($ ½½¾ 3#'!" ~ }~ ¾À ½½¾ Fig. 1. ; Talbotiomyces calosporus+ U* % @@Z *@Z <>/ ?Talbotiomyces, Entorrhiza %Ascomycota, Basidiomycota Glomeromycota+ % U* 1#6\+ 16"6V Gromochytrium mamkaevae Olpidium brassicae Talbotiomycetaceae 2 + 2 V Talbotiomyces 2 ; = XI+ fam. nov. Entorrhiza U+ U+E!6#"E + % Diagnosis: U Talbotiomycetales % Entorrhiza Talbotiomyces % Type[TalbotiomycesXet al.566# . V !"4F W !"E6 < IQ !"E!+ et al.!""#566!56!4X et al.566#9% DISCUSSION Entorrhiza TalbotiomycesEntorrhiza is O Entorrhiza/Talbotiomyces relationship Cyperaceae Juncaceae+ et al.!""#566!N Talbotiomyces calosporus % T. calosporus Entorrhiza @@Z *@Z <>/ W ! CaryophyllalesXet al.566#V VOLUME 6 · NO. 1 131 Riess et al. % Entorrhizomycota Talbotiomyces calosporus 9ZX 2 [ Entorrhizales Talbotiomycetales X +N; @ ] V V Z % / UV W/+N ]@ % Talbotiomyces Entorrhiza % V % Entorrhizomycota V ] W <W]+/#4\_.!K+S556!\#.! ARTICLE Talbotiomyces Entorrhizomycota, % % + et al.56!4. REFERENCES Coevolution and presumed host spectrum + + < Q W ; U + U* @ Entorrhiza Talbotiomyces 566! Ustilaginomycetes N[ The Mycota. X # ; + % Systematics and Evolution. U* <` U* S] Entorrhiza *;/[4#ME_+ [@ Cyperaceae Juncaceae + ] @Q W 2 %Uet al.56!4 X Entorrhizomycota[ % % 56!5 Talbotiomyces calosporus % FungiPLoS ONE[ @ / Limeum viscosum + * OU+ <; = UX2et al.566E/ Molluginaceae Trianthema pentandraAizoaceae Mycological Research 112[!5"#M!_6F V !"4F W X et al. 566# + Q WX2!""#Z Portulaca oleraceaPortulacaceae $ Canadian Journal of % 9ZX 5!_"# Botany 75[!5#_M!_!7 V 2X[ON [ + * @ + 56!5 Annonaceae Entorrhiza calospora P V T. calosporus\ NN[ Dasyspora + I U/ G Mycologia 104[ P. oleracea\ [ N F4"MFE! T. calosporus + < + Q W !""E O!""#P~ ; *@Z <>/ ? . $ Canadian Journal of Botany 75[5674M564F + < @ U + 566# O566FP~ / + et al.566E* Oet al. Ustilaginomycotina 566E] et al.566";et al.56!!+et al.56!5 Mycologia 98["6FM"!F * 9 56!_; = et al.56!556!_X O G ` 5666 @ % et al.56!7X et al.56!7UV et al.56!4< Molecular Entorrhizomycota Biology and Evolution 17[476M445 + et al. 56!4 O <]Q W!"E!@ ; % \ 7N% Entorrhiza casparyana % V Talbotiomyces in Mycologia 73[_"5M_"E Entorrhizomycota$ <% GU <% VV 56!5 > F Cyperaceae\JuncaceaePoales / Mycotaxon 121[5!4M55_ Entorrhizomycota W `U!"#E/ $ % EntorrhizaG F66U K+ et al.56!4 UstilaginalesNova Hedwigia 30[!MFE !46 U K et al. 566! V W `U !"E6 V Entorrhiza Entorrhizomycota % G Ustilaginales Cyperaceae . % < JuncaceaeNova Hedwigia 32[5F4M5E7 %. ] / V ` !""5 ; ;G Entorrhizomycota [ ? !E@ <>/ % % O Mycologia 84[4E"M4"5 % / Entorrhiza\ ] @ 2 + Q W % U 56!_ Talbotiomyces ; % V$ % [ Entorrhizomycota FEMS Microbiology Ecology 83[5F4M5#E . O ] UX 9+O?O]]Q W566"@ Sebacinales %et [ Hyaloperonospora al.56!!] et al.56!_ NV@ *@Z ? Mycological Research 113[_6EM_54 2 2 2 2 V 9 U V 5664 U/WWV % 4[ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS %.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Soil Fungal Community of Native Woodland in Andean Patagonian
    Forest Ecology and Management 461 (2020) 117955 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco The soil fungal community of native woodland in Andean Patagonian forest: T A case study considering experimental forest management and seasonal effects ⁎ Ayelen Inés Carrona,b, , Lucas Alejandro Garibaldic, Sebastian Marquezd, Sonia Fontenlaa,b a Laboratorio de Microbiología Aplicada y Biotecnología Vegetal y del Suelo, Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue (UNComahue), Argentina b Instituto Andino Patagónico de Tecnologías Biológicas y Geoambientales (IPATEC) UNComahue – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina c Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural (IRNAD), Sede Andina, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN) and CONICET, Argentina d Instituto de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Medio Ambiente (INIBIOMA) UNComahue – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Forest management can alter soil fungal communities which are important in the regulation of biogeochemical Soil fungal classification cycles and other ecosystem services. The current challenge of sustainable management is that management be Diversity analysis carried out while preserving the bioecological aspects of ecosystems. Mixed Patagonian woodlands are subject to Shrubland management continuous disturbance (fire, wood
    [Show full text]
  • A Higher-Level Phylogenetic Classification of the Fungi
    mycological research 111 (2007) 509–547 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi David S. HIBBETTa,*, Manfred BINDERa, Joseph F. BISCHOFFb, Meredith BLACKWELLc, Paul F. CANNONd, Ove E. ERIKSSONe, Sabine HUHNDORFf, Timothy JAMESg, Paul M. KIRKd, Robert LU¨ CKINGf, H. THORSTEN LUMBSCHf, Franc¸ois LUTZONIg, P. Brandon MATHENYa, David J. MCLAUGHLINh, Martha J. POWELLi, Scott REDHEAD j, Conrad L. SCHOCHk, Joseph W. SPATAFORAk, Joost A. STALPERSl, Rytas VILGALYSg, M. Catherine AIMEm, Andre´ APTROOTn, Robert BAUERo, Dominik BEGEROWp, Gerald L. BENNYq, Lisa A. CASTLEBURYm, Pedro W. CROUSl, Yu-Cheng DAIr, Walter GAMSl, David M. GEISERs, Gareth W. GRIFFITHt,Ce´cile GUEIDANg, David L. HAWKSWORTHu, Geir HESTMARKv, Kentaro HOSAKAw, Richard A. HUMBERx, Kevin D. HYDEy, Joseph E. IRONSIDEt, Urmas KO˜ LJALGz, Cletus P. KURTZMANaa, Karl-Henrik LARSSONab, Robert LICHTWARDTac, Joyce LONGCOREad, Jolanta MIA˛ DLIKOWSKAg, Andrew MILLERae, Jean-Marc MONCALVOaf, Sharon MOZLEY-STANDRIDGEag, Franz OBERWINKLERo, Erast PARMASTOah, Vale´rie REEBg, Jack D. ROGERSai, Claude ROUXaj, Leif RYVARDENak, Jose´ Paulo SAMPAIOal, Arthur SCHU¨ ßLERam, Junta SUGIYAMAan, R. Greg THORNao, Leif TIBELLap, Wendy A. UNTEREINERaq, Christopher WALKERar, Zheng WANGa, Alex WEIRas, Michael WEISSo, Merlin M. WHITEat, Katarina WINKAe, Yi-Jian YAOau, Ning ZHANGav aBiology Department, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA bNational Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information,
    [Show full text]
  • Systema Naturae. the Classification of Living Organisms
    Systema Naturae. The classification of living organisms. c Alexey B. Shipunov v. 5.601 (June 26, 2007) Preface Most of researches agree that kingdom-level classification of living things needs the special rules and principles. Two approaches are possible: (a) tree- based, Hennigian approach will look for main dichotomies inside so-called “Tree of Life”; and (b) space-based, Linnaean approach will look for the key differences inside “Natural System” multidimensional “cloud”. Despite of clear advantages of tree-like approach (easy to develop rules and algorithms; trees are self-explaining), in many cases the space-based approach is still prefer- able, because it let us to summarize any kinds of taxonomically related da- ta and to compare different classifications quite easily. This approach also lead us to four-kingdom classification, but with different groups: Monera, Protista, Vegetabilia and Animalia, which represent different steps of in- creased complexity of living things, from simple prokaryotic cell to compound Nature Precedings : doi:10.1038/npre.2007.241.2 Posted 16 Aug 2007 eukaryotic cell and further to tissue/organ cell systems. The classification Only recent taxa. Viruses are not included. Abbreviations: incertae sedis (i.s.); pro parte (p.p.); sensu lato (s.l.); sedis mutabilis (sed.m.); sedis possi- bilis (sed.poss.); sensu stricto (s.str.); status mutabilis (stat.m.); quotes for “environmental” groups; asterisk for paraphyletic* taxa. 1 Regnum Monera Superphylum Archebacteria Phylum 1. Archebacteria Classis 1(1). Euryarcheota 1 2(2). Nanoarchaeota 3(3). Crenarchaeota 2 Superphylum Bacteria 3 Phylum 2. Firmicutes 4 Classis 1(4). Thermotogae sed.m. 2(5).
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Ustilaginomycotina
    Persoonia 33, 2014: 41–47 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158514X682313 Moniliellomycetes and Malasseziomycetes, two new classes in Ustilaginomycotina Q.-M. Wang1, B. Theelen2, M. Groenewald2, F.-Y. Bai1,2, T. Boekhout1,2,3,4 Key words Abstract Ustilaginomycotina (Basidiomycota, Fungi) has been reclassified recently based on multiple gene sequence analyses. However, the phylogenetic placement of two yeast-like genera Malassezia and Moniliella in fungi the subphylum remains unclear. Phylogenetic analyses using different algorithms based on the sequences of six molecular phylogeny genes, including the small subunit (18S) ribosomal DNA (rDNA), the large subunit (26S) rDNA D1/D2 domains, smuts the internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS 1 and 2) including 5.8S rDNA, the two subunits of RNA polymerase II taxonomy (RPB1 and RPB2) and the translation elongation factor 1-α (EF1-α), were performed to address their phylogenetic yeasts positions. Our analyses indicated that Malassezia and Moniliella represented two deeply rooted lineages within Ustilaginomycotina and have a sister relationship to both Ustilaginomycetes and Exobasidiomycetes. Those clades are described here as new classes, namely Moniliellomycetes with order Moniliellales, family Moniliellaceae, and genus Moniliella; and Malasseziomycetes with order Malasseziales, family Malasseziaceae, and genus Malasse- zia. Phenotypic differences support this classification suggesting widely different life styles among the mainly plant pathogenic Ustilaginomycotina. Article info Received: 25 October 2013; Accepted: 12 March 2014; Published: 23 May 2014. INTRODUCTION in the Exobasidiomycetes based on molecular phylogenetic analyses of the nuclear ribosomal RNA genes alone or in Basidiomycota (Dikarya, Fungi) contains three main phyloge- combination with protein genes (Begerow et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms Michael A. Ruggiero1*, Dennis P. Gordon2, Thomas M. Orrell1, Nicolas Bailly3, Thierry Bourgoin4, Richard C. Brusca5, Thomas Cavalier-Smith6, Michael D. Guiry7, Paul M. Kirk8 1 Integrated Taxonomic Information System, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America, 2 National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand, 3 WorldFish—FIN, Los Baños, Philippines, 4 Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), UMR 7205 MNHN-CNRS-UPMC-EPHE, Sorbonne Universités, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 57, rue Cuvier, CP 50, F-75005, Paris, France, 5 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America, 6 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 7 The AlgaeBase Foundation & Irish Seaweed Research Group, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland, 8 Mycology Section, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom * [email protected] Abstract We present a consensus classification of life to embrace the more than 1.6 million species already provided by more than 3,000 taxonomists’ expert opinions in a unified and coherent, OPEN ACCESS hierarchically ranked system known as the Catalogue of Life (CoL). The intent of this collab- orative effort is to provide a hierarchical classification serving not only the needs of the Citation: Ruggiero MA, Gordon DP, Orrell TM, Bailly CoL’s database providers but also the diverse public-domain user community, most of N, Bourgoin T, Brusca RC, et al. (2015) A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms. PLoS whom are familiar with the Linnaean conceptual system of ordering taxon relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Level Classification of the Fungi and a Tool for Evolutionary Ecological Analyses
    Fungal Diversity (2018) 90:135–159 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0401-0 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) High-level classification of the Fungi and a tool for evolutionary ecological analyses 1,2,3 4 1,2 3,5 Leho Tedersoo • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • Urmas Ko˜ ljalg • Mohammad Bahram • 6 6,7 8 5 1 Markus Do¨ ring • Dmitry Schigel • Tom May • Martin Ryberg • Kessy Abarenkov Received: 22 February 2018 / Accepted: 1 May 2018 / Published online: 16 May 2018 Ó The Author(s) 2018 Abstract High-throughput sequencing studies generate vast amounts of taxonomic data. Evolutionary ecological hypotheses of the recovered taxa and Species Hypotheses are difficult to test due to problems with alignments and the lack of a phylogenetic backbone. We propose an updated phylum- and class-level fungal classification accounting for monophyly and divergence time so that the main taxonomic ranks are more informative. Based on phylogenies and divergence time estimates, we adopt phylum rank to Aphelidiomycota, Basidiobolomycota, Calcarisporiellomycota, Glomeromycota, Entomoph- thoromycota, Entorrhizomycota, Kickxellomycota, Monoblepharomycota, Mortierellomycota and Olpidiomycota. We accept nine subkingdoms to accommodate these 18 phyla. We consider the kingdom Nucleariae (phyla Nuclearida and Fonticulida) as a sister group to the Fungi. We also introduce a perl script and a newick-formatted classification backbone for assigning Species Hypotheses into a hierarchical taxonomic framework, using this or any other classification system. We provide an example
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Major Clades - Subphyla - of the Basidiomycota
    3 Major Clades - Subphyla - of the Basidiomycota Agaricomycotina mushrooms, polypores, jelly fungi, corals, chanterelles, crusts, puffballs, stinkhorns Ustilaginomycotina smuts, Exobasidium, Malassezia Pucciniomycotina rusts, Septobasidium Ustilaginomycotina (Ustilaginomycetes) Ustilaginomycetes Urocystales Ustilaginales Exobasidiomycetes Exobasidiales Malasseziales Tilletiales Entorrhizomycetes simple septum with septal pore cap, not like the dolipore septum with parenthosome of Agaricomycotina Subphylum Ustilaginomycotina- smuts and relatives Ustilaginomycetes About 1500 species, 50 genera Parasitic on about 4000 spp of angiosperms, 75 families Economically important pathogens of cereals Corn smut Ustilago maydis Oat smut U. avenae Tilletia spp. “smuts and bunts” General life cycle of Ustilaginomycetes Alternate between saprobic, monokaryotic yeast and phytoparasitic, dikaryotic filamentous phases Ustilaginales-smuts • mating between monokaryotic spores • no specialized mating structures • unifactorial and bifactorial mating systems • monokaryons nonparasitic, saprobic • dikaryon phytoparasitic • heterothallic- mating of compatible spores • dimorphic- yeast and filamentous phases • teliospores teliospores germinate, give rise to a short germ tube of determinate growth called the promycelium. Promycelium: site of meiosis formation of sporidia Corn smut, Ustilago maydis Life cycle of Ustilago maydis Yeast stage, monokaryon persists in soil as saprobe Teliospores germinate to produce monokaryotic sporidia, equivalent to basidiospores Monokaryotic
    [Show full text]
  • Elsevier Editorial System(Tm) for Mycological Research
    Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Mycological Research Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: MYCRES-D-07-00031R2 Title: A Higher-Level Phylogenetic Classification of the Fungi Article Type: Original Research Keywords: AFTOL, Eumycota, Lichens, Molecular phylogenetics, Mycota, Nomenclature, Systematics Corresponding Author: David S. Hibbett, Corresponding Author's Institution: Clark University First Author: David S Hibbett, PhD Order of Authors: David S Hibbett, PhD; David S. Hibbett Manuscript Region of Origin: UNITED STATES Abstract: A comprehensive phylogenetic classification of the kingdom Fungi is proposed, with reference to recent molecular phylogenetic analyses, and with input from diverse members of the fungal taxonomic community. The classification includes 195 taxa, down to the level of order, of which 19 are described or validated here: Dikarya subkingdom nov.; Chytridiomycota, Neocallimastigomycota phyla nov.; Agaricomycetes, Dacrymycetes, Monoblepharidomycetes, Neocallimastigomycetes, Tremellomycetes class. nov.; Eurotiomycetidae, Lecanoromycetidae, Mycocaliciomycetidae subclass. nov.; Acarosporales, Corticiales, Baeomycetales, Candelariales, Gloeophyllales, Melanosporales, Trechisporales, Umbilicariales ords. nov. The clade containing Ascomycota and Basidiomycota is classified as subkingdom Dikarya, reflecting the putative synapomorphy of dikaryotic hyphae. The most dramatic shifts in the classification relative to previous works concern the groups that have traditionally been included in the Chytridiomycota and Zygomycota.
    [Show full text]
  • Rewiring of Transcriptional Networks As a Major Event Leading to The
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/627414; this version posted May 7, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Rewiring of transcriptional networks as a major event leading to the diversity of asexual multicellularity in fungi. ≠ Oier Etxebeste1, , Ainara Otamendi1, Aitor Garzia3, Eduardo A. Espeso2, Marc S. Cortese1. Running title: Evolution of asexual developmental regulators. One-sentence summary: A study of the evolution of regulators that control the production of asexual spores in fungi. 1Laboratory of Biology, Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of The Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 20018 San Sebastian, Spain. 2Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas (CSIC), Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040 Madrid, Spain. 3Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Laboratory for RNA Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, Box 186, New York, NY 10065, USA ≠ Corresponding author: Oier Etxebeste; E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: (+34) 943 018517; Fax: (+34) 943 015270; Laboratory of Biology, Dept. of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of the Basque Country, Manuel de Lardizabal, 3, 20018, San Sebastian. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/627414; this version posted May 7, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fungi: an Advance Treatise
    Biologia dos Fungos Olga Fischman Gompertz Walderez Gambale Claudete Rodrigues Paula Benedito Correa Parede. E uma estrutura rfgida que protege a celula de choques osm6ticos (possui ate oito camadas e mede de 200 Durante muito tempo, os fungos foram considerados a 350nm). E composta, de modo geral, por glucanas, mananas coma vegetais e, somente a partir de 1969, passaram a ser e, em menor quantidade, por quitina, protefnas e lipfdios. As c1assificados em urn reino a parte denominado Fungi. glucanas e as mananas estao combinadas corn protefnas, for- Os fungos apresentam urn conjunto de caracterfsticas mando as glicoprotefnas, manoprotefnas e glicomanoprotef- que permitem sua diferenciac;:ao das plantas: nao sintetizam nas. Estudos citoqufmicos demonstraram que cada camada c1orofila nem qualquer pigmento fotossintetico; nao tern ce- possui urn polissacarfdeo dominante: as camadas mais inter- lulose na parede celular, exceto alguns fungos aquaticos, e nas (8~ e 5~) contem beta-1-3, beta-I-3-g1ucanas e mananas, nao armazenarn amide coma substancia de reserva. A presen- enquanto as mais extern as contem mananas e beta-I-6- c;:ade substancias quitinosas na parede da maior parte das glucanas (Fig. 64.2). A primeira e a terceira camadas sac as especies fungicas e a capacidade de armazenar glicogenio os mms ncas em mananas. assemelharn as celulas animais. As ~lucan~ nas ceIulas fUngicas sac normalmente po- Os fungos sac ubfquos, encontrando-se em vegetais, em lfmeros de b-glicose, ligados por pontes betaglicosfdicas. animais, no homem, em detritos e em abundancia no solo, As mananas, polfmeros de manose, representam 0 mate- participando ativamente do cicIo dos elementos na natureza.
    [Show full text]
  • This Documents Describes Changes to the January 2006 Draft Classification, Which Were Made in Response to Suggestions Received B
    This documents describes changes to the January 2006 draft classification, which were made in response to suggestions received by e-mail and discussions at Deep Hypha in Baton Rouge, LA, March 2006. Revisions were made in two phases, in July and September/October 2006. The groups that have been affected are highlighted in the file Classification_draft7_10-06.doc. Groups that were modified in July are highlighted in blue, and groups that were modified in September/October 2006 are highlighted in red. Earlier changes are described in the document Prop_changes_basidios_etc.pdf. 1. Include subphylum Zoopagomycotina, with order Zoopagales, in Fungi, incertae sedis. This group was inadvertently excluded from the prior classification. 2. Eliminate the infra-phylum level classification in the Microsporidiomycota. The taxonomy of microsporidia employed in the prior version of this classification followed Vossbrinck and Debrunner-Vossbrinck (2005), who recognized four classes, of which one (Aquasporidia) is diphyletic (see Prop_changes_basidios_etc.pdf item 15). On reflection, we decided that is would be premature to suggest an ordinal level classification of microsporidia without multilocus data for diverse microsporidia, and the input of experts in this group. 3. Elevate subphylum Blastocladiomycotina to phylum Blastocladiomycota, eliminate Blastocladiomycotina as a taxon. This is based on rRNA gene analyses and is being proposed by James et al. in the forthcoming Mycologia Deep Hypha issue. 4. Change name of Uredinomycotina to Pucciniomycotina, with class Pucciniomycetes, and order Pucciniales. This change follows the earlier suggestion of Bauer et al. (see Prop_changes_basidios_etc.pdf first item). 5. Move Entorrhizomycetes, Entorrhizales, from Ustilaginomycotina to Basidiomycota incertae sedis. This is based on recent analyses of Matheny et al (in press), using nuc-lsu and nuc-ssu rRNA sequences, which suggest that Entorrhizomycetes are not in Ustilaginomycotina.
    [Show full text]
  • AR TICLE Identification of a New Order of Root
    IMA FUNGUS · 6(1): 129–133 (2015) doi:10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.01.07 Identification of a new order of root-colonising fungi in the ARTICLE Entorrhizomycota: Talbotiomycetales ord. nov. on eudicotyledons Kai Riess1, Robert Bauer1, Ronny Kellner2, Martin Kemler3, Marcin Piątek4, Kálmán Vánky5, and Dominik Begerow6 1University of Tübingen, Institute of Evolution and Ecology, Plant Evolutionary Ecology, Auf der Morgenstelle 1, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] 2The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK 3Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Cnr Lynnwood and University Road, Hatfield 0083, Pretoria, South Africa 4W. Szafer Institute of Botany of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Mycology, Lubicz 46, PL-31-512 Kraków, Poland 5Gabriel-Biel-Straße 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany 6University of Bochum, AG Geobotanik, Universitätsstraße 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany Abstract: The recently described fungal phylum Entorrhizomycota was established solely for the genus Key words: Entorrhiza, species of which cause root-galls in Cyperaceae and Juncaceae. Talbotiomyces calosporus Entorrhiza (incertae sedis) shares morphological characteristics and an ecological niche with species of Entorrhiza. We fungal evolution investigated the higher classification ofT. calosporus to determine whether it belongs in Entorrhizomycota. molecular phylogeny Ribosomal DNA sequences showed Talbotiomyces to be a close relative of Entorrhiza and both taxa form a root galls highly supported monophyletic group. Based on molecular phylogenetic analyses and in congruence with Talbotiomyces existing morphological and ecological data, Entorrhiza and Talbotiomyces represent a deep dichotomy within the Entorrhizomycota. While species of Entorrhiza are characterised by dolipores and occur on monocotyledons, members of Talbotiomyces are characterised by simple pores and are associated with eudicotyledons.
    [Show full text]