Pdf (Accessed 3 March 2014)

Notes

Introduction

1. In this book I use the term ‘psychosis’ consistent with Lacanian nosology. In Lacanian theory, psychosis refers to a clinical structure and form of subjectivity distinct from both neurosis and perversion. Moreover, the clinical structure of psychosis is inclusive of various subtypes of psychosis, such as paranoia, schizophrenia and melancholia. In contrast, other nosological approaches, such as the DSM, utilise different terminology to refer to the same clinical entity. 2. Miller is a central figure in the French psychoanalytic tradition, and the World Association of Psychoanalysis provides seminars and courses for training ana- lysts with a particular focus on the clinical and theoretical significance of Lacan’s later teachings. The phrase ‘Lacan’s later teachings’ does not refer to a specific time period or set of ideas; however, it may roughly be situ- ated in the 1970s, and, as Voruz and Wolf (2007) state, it is characterised by the reorganisation of fundamental psychoanlaytic concepts and the creation of new ones to theorise impasses and paradoxes inherent to psychoanalytic praxis. My book affirms this line of reasoning by examining the continu- ity and discontinuity in his theory of psychosis through investigating body phenomena in ordinary psychosis. 3. Theorists argue that an ordinary psychosis is difficult to diagnose, in part because it is a ‘milder’ expression of psychosis with an atypical symptomatology. Thus, an ordinary psychosis does not constitute a new syndrome of psychosis; rather, it examines how classical forms of psychosis, i.e. paranoia, schizophrenia and mania, may emerge in relatively sta- ble forms, such as when delusions and hallucinations are absent (Svolos, 2009). 4. I use the term onset when referring to the notion of the first psychotic episode and when discussing the idea of untriggered psychosis. In contrast, I use the phrase triggering events when referring to post-onset psychotic episodes—I discuss these issues in detail in Chapters 4 and 5. 5. See issue 19 of Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psycho- analysis for a collection of papers dedicated to the theme of ordinary psychosis. 6. Here Freud states ‘the elucidation of the various mechanisms which are designed, in the psychoses, to turn the subject away from reality and to recon- struct reality—this is a task for specialised psychiatric study which has not yet been taken in hand’ (1924 [1957], p. 186). 7. Lacan’s classical theory of psychosis refers to the essays and seminars in the 1950s where the foreclosure of the Name-of-the-Father was first introduced (1958 [2006], 1993).

147 148 Notes

1 Mild Psychosis, the Body and Ordinary Psychosis

1. The neurosis/psychosis distinction provides a template for approaching clinical phenomena and, historically, formed the basis of classical psychiatry nosology (Beer, 1996). It remains central to Lacanian nosology and is a point I return to throughout this chapter. 2. See Maleval (2000) for a comprehensive Lacanian-oriented critique of BPD. 3. The severity dimension is a spectrum used to assess a range of factors such as suitability for psychoanalytic treatment and the form of which any psychoanalytic treatment may take. My focus on the severity dimension will outline the developmental assumptions underlying the deficit notion of psychopathology. 4. I use the term ‘classical psychiatry’ to refer to the field of psychiatry that emerged in the nineteenth century around the ideas of Kraepelin, Bleuler and others (Cutting and Shepherd, 1987). 5. A third clinical structure, perversion, is also utilised in Lacanian theory (Dor, 1997), but will not be discussed here owing to its marginal status in the clinical field (Fink, 1997) and ongoing doubt over its nosological status (Miller, 2009). 6. Freud, like Jung, claims that hallucinations are attempts at recovery in schizophrenia. Despite this, I focus on Freud’s text on Schreber, as this thesis has clearer import to my latter discussion of symptom formation in psychosis. For a discussion of the reparative function of hallucinations in psychosis see Vanheule (2011a, 2011b). 7. See Vanheule (2011b) for a slightly different reading on the status of the neurosis/psychosis distinction in Lacan’s later teachings. 8. Sauvagnat, F. (2009) ‘Elementary Phenomena and Ordinary Psychosis’ (unpublished manuscript). 9. Sauvagnat, F. (2009) ‘Elementary Phenomena and Ordinary Psychosis’ (unpublished manuscript). 10. See also Sauvagnat, F. (2009) ‘Elementary Phenomena and Ordinary Psy- chosis’ (unpublished manuscript).

2 Case Studies on Ordinary Psychosis and the Body

1. I analyse the three functions of the Name-of-the-Father operative in neurosis—castration, identiﬁcation and naming (Stevens, 2007)—in Chapter 6. 2. Lacan makes this point throughout his teachings; for example, in ‘L’Etourdit’ he states that the schizophrenic’s ‘body is not without other organs, and that their function for each, is a problem for it—by which the so-called schizophrenic is speciﬁed as being taken beyond the help of any established discourse’ (1972, p. 18). 3. Lacan’s theory of the ‘A-father’ is an important feature of his classical theory psychosis and its onset. In Chapter 5, I discuss the limitations of these ideas in cases of ordinary psychosis with reference to both the hole in the symbolic wrought by the foreclosure of the Name-of-the-Father and Lacan’s idea of the ‘real’ father derived from Freud’s Totem and Taboo. Notes 149

4. Phallic signification and, more broadly, the phallic function, refers to the subject’s regulation and organisation of jouissance under castration. Phallic signification structures the neurotic subject’s relations with others, the imaginary body, sex, jouissance, symptoms and language. In Chapter 5, I explore disturbances to phallic signification and the imaginary in cases of ordinary psychosis by examining its relevance to the onset of psychosis. 5. These symbols are derived from Lacan’s schema in ‘On a Question Prior to

any Possible Treatment of Psychosis’ (1958 [2006]). F0 refers to the absence of phallic signiﬁcation in the imaginary and is usually referred to as a

consequence of P0 or symbolic foreclosure. 6. Lacan states that in psychosis, feminisation of the male subject may occur owing to the foreclosure of the signifier the Name-of-the-Father. More specifi- cally, the subject’s feminine identification is attributed by assuming a passive position with an imaginary father: this relation is characterised by aggression, rivalry and erotic tension (Fink, 1997). Moreover, feminine identification occurs as a result of the absence of a phallic signifier. Sexual difference is not inscribed in the phallic function; as such, sexual identity is not assumed via the ‘normative’ neurotic pathway. 7. In this article, Lacadée implies that there has been no clear onset of psychosis. He maintains that the emergence of invasive anxiety and the subsequent modulation of this experience via the hairdryer functions to deter the onset of psychosis. 8. As the ‘Trésor de la langue française’ indicates, the term frigore is not, strictly speaking, a neologism; rather, it is a Latin medical term designating, among other things, forms of facial paralysis that may be caused by the common cold virus (‘A frigore: Définition,’ n.d.). However, despite this, the emergence of perplexity that accompanied its verbalisation supports the notion that this signifier appeared in the real, as opposed to the symbolic. In addition, for Virginie, the signifier’s facial paralysis and cold are significant, as she discov- ered the dead body of her infant brother; her description of this event is centred on stillness on the deceased’s face (Lacadée, 2006). 9. In this case, although there was no unequivocal evidence of the onset of psychosis, it is highly probable that it occurred in Adam’s history prior to engaging in psychotherapy. 10. The case material featuring Adam is taken from my own clinical practice. 11. The history of a head injury raises the question concerning the existence of a traumatic brain injury; unfortunately, Adam refused to seek any additional medical treatment, despite repeated encouragement to do so. This issue of organic brain injury is, of course, an important consideration, as there may be an organic basis to his ‘psychiatric’ signs and symptoms. However, despite the absence of medical assessments, as all of his signs and symptoms existed prior to the head trauma—except for the involuntary watery eye—the assumption of a non-organic psychosis remains plausible.

3 Modern Psychiatry and Lacan’s Theory of Psychosis

1. From a diagnostic perspective, it is important to note that not all automatisms reﬂect an underlying psychosis: automatisms are a necessary condition for a 150 Notes

psychosis, although not a sufﬁcient condition. In de Clérambault’s theory of psychosis, multiple types of automatisms, which emerge across different func- tional modalities (motor, sensory, mental), are required to make a diagnosis of psychosis (Hriso, 2002a). In contemporary psychiatry, the idea of automatism is used in a narrow sense, referring to automatic acts with an unconscious motivation (Sadock and Sadock, 2003). 2. See also Sauvagnat, F. (2009) ‘Elementary Phenomena and Ordinary Psychosis’ (unpublished manuscript). 3. It is important to differentiate the concept of foreclosure from the foreclosure of the Name-of-the-Father; in Lacan’s later teachings, the concept of foreclosure becomes more important and is not necessarily associated with psychosis. I explore the theoretical importance of the term foreclosure in Chapter 5 in the broader context of triggering events. 4. See Vanheule (2011b) for an in-depth discussion of the delusional metaphor in the Schreber case. 5. Lacan’s theory of psychosis does not provide a clear aetiology of how a psychotic structure emerges. This is owing primarily to the supposition that the subject will take an active stance in relation to the Other; thus, it is not possible to say what events predict psychosis as doing so effectively discounts the stance the subject takes in response to such events. Furthermore, while severe traumatic experience, particularly attachment trauma in earlier childhood, is often linked to severe disturbances, including psychosis, it has no necessary link to it. This position differs from other approaches (Hammersley et al., 2008) in which an unequivocal link is made between severe trauma/abuse and psychosis emerging later in life. 6. In these papers, Miller refers to incomplete triggering events, as opposed to the onset of psychosis, when referring to triggering events on the imaginary plane. I return to this issue in Chapter 5. 7. See also Sauvagnat, F. (2009) ‘Elementary Phenomena and Ordinary Psychosis’ (unpublished manuscript).

4 Competing Lacanian Views of Psychosis and the Body

1. Freud identified five distinct formations of the unconscious: symptoms, dreams, jokes, bungled actions and the lapsus. 2. Freud’s use of the term ‘actual neurosis’ traverses the neurosis/psychosis distinction as it is inclusive of three distinct clinical syndromes: anxiety neurosis, neurasthenia and hypochondriasis (1916–17 [1957]). For a description of how Freud uses the term ‘actual neurosis’ throughout his psychoanalytic writings see Laplanche and Pontalis (1973), The Language of Psycho-analysis. 3. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition, Text Revision (2002) generalized anxiety disorder has its nosological antecedents in Freud’s theory of the actual neuroses (Tyrer and Baldwin, 2006). 4. Freud’s theory of the actual neuroses has been particularly influential in the area of ‘psychosomatic’ theories of illness; see McDougall and Cohen (2000), Aisemberg and Aisenstein (2004), Taylor (2003) Verhaeghe (2004) and Verhaeghe et al. (2007) for a discussion of these issues. Notes 151

5. It is important to note that in Freud’s early work in particular, the term psychoneurotic included psychotic phenomena. 6. Verhaeghe (2004) uses the term ‘the actualpathological position of the subject’ when referring to the clinical phenomena outlined by Freud’s idea of the actual neuroses; moreover, like Freud, his approach to actualpathological states moves across the diagnostic spectrum: neurosis, psychosis and perversion. Although my discussion focuses on actualpathological states in psychosis, the mechanism underlying actualpathology—the failure of the Other to adequately mirror and hence modulate the subject’s endogenous drive tension—is applicable to neurosis, psychosis and perversion. 7. See Vanheule (2011b) for a good discussion of Lacan’s idea of the object a in psychosis. 8. Verhaeghe (2004) uses the term ‘the psychopathological position of the subject’ when referring to what Freud (1894a [1957]) called the ‘neuro-psychoses of defense’; this includes hysterical neurosis, obsessional neurosis, anxiety hysteria and paranoia. What these entities have in common is that primary process mechanisms are active determinants in symptom formation. 9. References to infant/mother mirroring theories in the work of Winnicott (mother’s holding function), Kohut (maternal mirroring function) and Bion (maternal containment) are an important part in Fonagy’s work; in essence, Fonagy et al. (2002) state that their infant–mother research provides an empirical basis in support of other psychoanalytic developmental theories derived from clinical experience. 10. An array of different mentalisation theories abound in Anglo-American psychoanalysis (Bouchard and Lecours, 2004; Godbout, 2005; Lecours, 2007; Mitrani, 1995); for a recent historical survey of how this term is used see Bouchard and Lecours (2008) ‘Contemporary Approaches to Mentalisation in the Light of Freud’s Project’. 11. Disturbances to phallic signiﬁcation in the imaginary are discussed in Chapter 5.

5 Revisiting the Body in the Onset of Psychosis

1. Akhtar’s (1984) paper on identity diffusion provides a contemporary reading of ‘as-if’ personality types, although his account is more expansive in address- ing six core features of identity disturbance: incompatible identity traits, temporal discontinuity in the self, lack of authenticity, feelings of emptiness, gender dysphoria and ethnic/moral relativism. 2. Although this is not Stevens’ case, he provides a detailed description of the patient’s history and symptomatology centred on the ﬁbromyalgia. 3. I address the functions of the Name-of-the-Father in psychosis in Chapter 6. 4. See Sauvagnat, F. (2009) ‘Elementary Phenomena and Ordinary Psychosis’ (unpublished manuscript). 5. To propose, as some clinicians sometimes do, that the psychotic subject is incapable of using or understanding metaphor is patently untrue; Lacan’s theory of paranoid psychosis, which is built around the idea of a ‘delusional metaphor’, refutes this claim. 152 Notes

6. Although Wachsberger contends that there is no theory of unchaining prior to Lacan’s introduction on the term, the focus on the ‘accidental cause’ triggering psychosis is evident in the works of Kraepelin, Bleuler and others in the modern psychiatric tradition. 7. Of course, Lacan (1958 [2006], 1993) leverages this point of difference when developing his theory of foreclosure, as opposed to repression and disavowal. 8. Ruth Mack Brunswick was a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst who underwent training with Freud, and who remained a conﬁdante and colleague until Freud’s death. 9. Castanet and De Georges (2008) also contend that Lacan’s focus on topology and knots provides an alternative model that addresses this impasse

in localising triggering events to either P0 or F0; they claim that a focus on the symptomatic knotting and rupture on the real, symbolic and the imaginary (RSI) addresses this impasse. However, the utility of this position remains to be seen, as this point is not developed in detail. Moreover, although other theorists (Skriabine, 2004) also claim that an unknotting of the RSI correlates with the onset of psychosis, these claims remain undevel- oped. In general, the clinical and theoretical signiﬁcance of Lacan’s research in topology and knot theory remains to be articulated in a comprehensive manner.

6 Ordinary Psychosis, Stabilisation and the Body

1. For example Harari (2002) uses this term in his monograph on Joyce. Here, foreclosure is an unavoidable dimension of psychic reality. The lack of signi- ﬁer is constitutive of subjectivity and this form of foreclosure is normative to the speaking being.

2. S1, the master signifier, and the Name-of-the-Father are central to Lacan’s later teaching; ostensibly, the S1 takes on the function of the Name-of-the- Father. 3. Lacan, J. (1974–75) ‘RSI (trans. T. Chadwick)’, The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, 1974–75, Book XXII (unpublished) and Lacan, J. (1975–76) ‘Joyce and the Sinthome’ (transl. C. Gallagher) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, 1975–76, Book XXIII (unpublished). 4. Lacan, J. (1974–75) ‘RSI (trans. T. Chadwick)’, The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, 1974–75, Book XXII (unpublished). 5. One speculative consequence of this is that neurosis is ‘closer’ to psychosis than previously thought. This also corresponds to the shift from categorical diagnosis (either neurosis or psychosis) to the ‘logic of the set’ where neurosis and psychosis are elements belonging to the same set. Lacan’s statement that ‘we are all mad’ is actually a thesis that reorients clinical and theoretical inquiry to the structure of psychosis. See Miller (2007b, 2009) and the recent publication ‘We’re all Mad Here’ (Brousse and Jaanus, 2013). 6. Although some theorists refer to catatonia in terms of the unknotting of the real, symbolic and the imaginary (Sauvagnat, 2000), I focus on Miller’s (2009) lexicon concerning the hole in the Other and the supplementary function of the signifier, as this corresponds with his line of inquiry in the field of ordinary psychosis. Notes 153

7. Lacan, J. (1975–76) ‘Joyce and the Sinthome’ (transl. C. Gallagher) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, 1975–76, Book XXIII (unpublished). 8. Lacan, J. (1975–76) ‘Joyce and the Sinthome’ (transl. C. Gallagher) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, 1975–76, Book XXIII (unpublished). 9. See Harari (2002) for an exposition of Joyce that critiques the notion of stabilised psychosis and that he was psychotic. 10. Lacan, J. (1975–76) ‘Joyce and the Sinthome’ (transl. C. Gallagher) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, 1975–76, Book XXIII, p. XI 15 (unpublished). 11. Lacan, J. (1975–76) ‘Joyce and the Sinthome’ (transl. C. Gallagher) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, 1975–76, Book XXIII (unpublished). 12. Schatzman’s (1973) analysis of the Schreber case focused extensively on trauma, body discipline and psychotic symptomatology through examination of the sadism shown by the father toward the son. Schatzman uses the term transform to theorise how the father’s pathology and harsh disciplinary methods, especially those involving the body, are transmitted to the son and, in particular, how this manifests in psychotic phenomena. Although his analysis does not constitute a primary focal point in this discussion, the important point to make here is that Schatzman’s discussion of the Schreber case highlights how the subject’s ‘corporeal history’ figures in psychotic symptomatology. 13. In addition, Adam’s conversations with his mother centred on whether his grandmother’s life needed to be ended when it was; although he did not accuse his mother of thoughtlessly making this end-of-life decision, he was preoccupied and anxious about this topic, which highlights the persecutory relation between them. 14. The case material featuring Adam is taken from my own clinical practice. 15. Medical evaluations do not show any organic basis for the painful body phenomena. Although Deffieux (2000) considers the diagnosis of hysterical neurosis and conversion disorder, both he and the treatment team arrive at the diagnosis of paranoia with hypochondriasis owing to the invasive nature of jouissance on the body and the existence of paranoid traits. He concludes that it is a case of hypochondriasis in the paranoid spectrum, an observa- tion that correlates with Freud’s description of actual neurosis in psychosis (Freud, 1916–17 [1957]) and Verhaeghe’s (2004) theory of actual pathology in psychosis. However, unlike these approaches, which emphasise the delusion as a form of recovery in the stabilisation of psychosis, another form of symptomatisation emerges to localise jouissance. 16. Freud’s case history of hysteria, featuring Elizabeth von. R., is of interest here: she experienced leg pain at the spot where her father rested his foot when she was nursing him through his recovery (Freud and Breuer, 1893–95 [1957]). In this vignette, the body phenomenon was considered a conversion symptom due to operation of repression and displacement: Freud argues that a psychical conflict derived from forbidden sexual wishes were the key factors underlying this formation of the unconscious. Moreover, Miller’s notion of body events contrasts with Verhaeghe’s (2004) theory of body phenomena in psychosis—the later stresses the endogenous excitation of the body and the failure of signifiers coming from the Other to regulate the internal drive tension, rather than the jouissance-riddled effects that language has on the subject. 154 Notes

17. See Harari (2002, p. 228) for a discussion of the term ‘parlêtre’. 18. Lacan’s use of the term swarm in conjunction with the master signiﬁer

implies that S1 is a plurality of signiﬁers that can be articulated into knowledge as the ‘S1, the swarm or master signiﬁer, is that which assures the unity, the unity of the subject’s copulation with knowledge’ (1998, p. 143). 19. One might consider autism to be another example of where the symbolic is equivalent to the real. However, as infantile psychosis emerges prior to the acquisition of language then this clinical structure has additional complexity. See Lefort (1980) for a Lacanian approach to autism.

Afterword

1. Vanheule’s (2011b) recent book on Lacan’s theories of psychosis provides a useful discussion of topology, the real, symbolic and imaginary (RSI), and psychotic structure. His claim that Lacan viewed knot theory as a formal language, similar to other branches of mathematics and logic, is a useful starting point for orientating oneself to the knotting of the RSI in terms of onset, triggering events and stabilisation in a psychotic structure. References

Aisemberg, P., and Aisenstein, M. (2004) ‘Theoretical Approaches to Somatic Con- ditions: Work at the Frontiers or Psychoanalytic Work?’, International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 85, 977–81. Akhtar, S. (1984) ‘The Syndrome of Identity Diffusion’. American Journal of Pyschiatry, 141, 1381–15. American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Men- tal Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association). American Psychiatric Association (2010) ‘DSM-5: The Future of Psychiatric Diag- nosis’, available at: http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Default.aspx (accessed 3 March 2014). American Psychiatric Association (2013a) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Men- tal Disorders, Fifth Edition (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association). American Psychiatric Association (2013b) ‘Schizophrenia – DSM-5’, available at: http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/Schizophrenia%20Fact%20Sheet. pdf (accessed 3 March 2014). Ansermet, F. and Magistretti, P. (2007) Biology of Freedom: Neural Plasticity, Experience, and the Unconscious (New York: Other Press). Bateman, A. (2007) ‘What is Mentalization Based Therapy?’, available at: http:// www.ucl.ac.uk/psychoanalysis/unit-staff/gothenburg.pdf (accessed 3 March 2014). Bateman, A. and Fonagy, P. (2004) ‘Mentalization-based Treatment of BPD’, Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 36–51. Bateman, A. and Fonagy, P. (2006) ‘Treatment of Borderline Personality Disor- der With Psychoanalytically Oriented Partial Hospitalization: An 18-month Follow-up’, American Journal of Psychiatry, 4, 244–52. Beer, M. (1996) ‘The Dichotomies: Psychosis/Neurosis and the Fucntional/Organic: A Historical Perspective’, History of Psychiatry, 7, 231–55. Belluck, P. and Benedict, C. (2013) ‘Psychiatry’s New Guide Falls Short, Experts Say’, available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/07/health/psychiatrys- new-guide-falls-short-experts-say.html (accessed 3 March 2014). Berrios, G. and Beer, D. (1994) ‘The Notion of Unitary Psychosis: A Conceptual History’, History of Psychiatry, 5, 13–36. Bleuler, E. (1987) ‘The Prognosis of Dementia Praecox: The Group of Schizophrenias’, in Cutting, J. and Shepard M. (eds) The Clinical Roots of the Schizophrenia Concept, pp. 59–74 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Boorstein, M. and Tenety, E. (2013) ‘Conservative Catholics Question Pope Francis’s Approach’, available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ on-faith/conservative-catholics-question-pope-franciss-approach/2013/10/12/ 21d7f484-2cf4-11e3-8ade-a1f23cda135e_story.html (accessed 3 March 2014). Bouchard, M.-A. and Lecours, S. (2004) ‘Analyzing Forms of Superego Function- ing as Mentalizations’, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 85, 879–96.

155 156 References

Bouchard, M.-A. and Lecours, S. (2008) ‘Contemporary Approaches to Mentalization in the Light of Freud’s Project’,inBusch,F.(ed.)Mentalization: Theoretical Considerations, Research Findings, and Clinical Implications, pp. 103–29 (Hoboken, NJ: The Analytic Press). Brousse, M. H. (1997) ‘Hysteria and Sinthome’, in Voruz, V. and Wolf, B. (eds) The Later Lacan: An Introduction, pp. 83–94 (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press). Brousse, M.-H. (2009) ‘Ordinary Psychoses in the Light of Lacan’s Theory of Dis- course’. Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 19, 7–20. Brousse, M.-H. and Jaanus, M. (2013) ‘Editorial’, in Miller J and Jaanus M (eds) Culture/Clinic, pp. 2–6 (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesta Press). Campbell, R. (2009) Campbell’s Psychiatric Dictionary (New York: Oxford Univer- sity Press). Carroll, L. (1998) ‘Through the Looking-glass, and What Alice Found There’, in Haughton, H. (ed.) Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking- Glass and What Alice Found There, pp. 119–242 (London: Penguin Books). Cassin, R. (2008) ‘Victor, the Erect Man’ (transl. V. Woollard), presented at the Paris English seminar ‘Ordinary Psychosis’. Castanet, H. and De Georges, P. (2008) ‘Plugging-in, Plugging-out, Plugging back in Again’ (transl. A. Price), presented at the Paris English seminar ‘Ordinary Psychosis’. Chiesa, L. (2007) Subjectivity and Otherness: A Philosophical Reading of Lacan (Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Cottet, S. (2000) ‘Four Preliminary Questions to a Renewal of the Clinic’ (transl. R. Klein), Psychoanalytical Notebooks,4. Cutting, J. and Shepherd, M. (1987) ‘Introduction’, in Cutting, J. and Shepherd,M.(eds)The Clinical Roots of the Schizophrenia Concept: Transla- tions of Seminal European Contributions on Schizophrenia, pp. 1–11 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). de Clérambault, G. G. (1925) ‘Psychoses with base of automatism, Pt. I.’, in Hriso, P. (ed. and transl.) Mental Automatisms: A Conceptual Journey Into Psychosis, pp. 203–37 (Bayonne, NJ: Hermes Whispers Press). de Clérambault, G. G. (1926) ‘Psychoses with Base of Automatism, Pt. II’, in Hriso, P. (ed. and transl.) Mental Automatisms: A Conceptual Journey Into Psychosis, pp. 231–70 (Bayonne, NJ: Hermes Whispers Press). Declerq, F. (2002) ‘The Real of the Body in Lacanian Theory’, Analysis, 11, 98–114. Declerq, F. (2004) ‘Lacan’s Concept of the Real of Jouissance: Clinical Illustrations and Implications’, Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, 9, 237–51. Defﬁeux, J.-P. (2000) ‘The Use of Metonymy in a Case of Psychosis’, Psychoanalytical Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 4, 147–58. Deutsch, H. (1942) ‘Some Forms of Emotional Disturbance and Their Relation- ship to Schizophrenia’, Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 11, 301–21. Dor, J. (1997) The Clinical Lacan (transl. S. Fairﬁeld) (Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson). Fink, B. (1997) A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). Fink, B. (2007) Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique: A Lacanian Approach for Practitioners (New York: W.W. Norton and Company). References 157

Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. and Target, M. (2002) Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self (New York: Other Press). Fonagy, P., Target, M., Gergely, G., Allen, J. G. and Bateman, A. W. (2003) ‘The Developmental Roots of Borderline Personality Disorder in Early Attachment Relationships’, Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 23, 412–59. Freeman, T. (1999) ‘The Delusions of the Non-remitting Schizophrenias: Paral- lels With Childhood Phantasies’, in Wise, I. and Williams, P. (eds) Psychosis, pp. 55–64 (London: The Institute of Psycho-Analysis). Freud, S. (1893 [1957]) ‘Draft B: The Aetiology of the Neuroses’, in: Strachey, J. (ed. and transl.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. I, pp. 179–84 (London: Hogarth Press). Freud, S. (1894a [1957]) ‘The Neuro-psychoses of Defense’, in Strachey, J. (ed. and transl.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. III, pp. 43–70 (London: Hogarth Press). Freud, S. (1894b [1957]) ‘Draft E: How Anxiety Originates’, in Strachey, J. (ed. and transl.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. I, pp. 189–95 (London: Hogarth Press). Freud, S. (1911 [1957]). ‘Psycho-analytic Notes on an Autobiographical Account of a Case of Paranoia’, in Strachey, J. (ed. and transl.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. X, pp. 3–32 (London: Hogarth Press). Freud, S. (1914 [1957]) ‘On Narcissism: An Introduction’, in Strachey, J. (ed. and trans.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, pp. 67–102 (London: Hogarth Press). Freud, S. (1915 [1957]) ‘The Unconscious’, in Strachey, J. (ed. and transl.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud,Vol.XIV, pp. 159–215 (London: Hogarth Press). Freud, S. (1916–17 [1957]) ‘Introductory Lectures on Psycho-analysis (Part III)’, in Strachey, J. (ed. and transl.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psycho- logical Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XVI, pp. 243–483 (London: The Horgarth Press). Freud, S. (1918 [1957]) ‘An Infantile Neurosis and Other Works’ in Strachey, J. (ed. and transl.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol XVII, pp. 7–124 (London: Hogarth Press). Freud, S. (1921 [1957]) ‘Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego’, in Strachey,J.(ed.andtransl.)The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XVIII, pp. 65–144 (London: Hogarth Press). Freud, S. (1924 [1957]) ‘The Loss of Reality in Neurosis and Psychosis’, in Strachey,J.(ed.andtransl.)The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIX, pp. 181–8 (London: Hogarth Press). Freud, S. and Breuer, J. (1893–95 [1957]) ‘Studies on Hysteria’, in Strachey, J. (ed. and transl.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. II, pp. 1–312 (London: Hogarth Press). Gabbard, G. (2000) Psychodynamic Psychiatry in Clinical Practice,3rded. (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press). Gardiner, M. (1991) ‘Introduction’, in Gardiner, M. (ed.) The Wolf-Man, pp. v–vii (New York: Noonday Press). Gault, J.-L. (2004) ‘The Man with a Hundred Thousand Hairs’, Psychoanalytical Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 12, 93–7. 158 References

Gault, J.-L. (2007) ‘Two Statuses of the Symptom: “Let us Turn to Finn Again” ’, in Voruz, V. and Wolf, B. (eds) The Later Lacan: An Introduction, pp. 73–82 (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press). Gault, J.-L. (2008) ‘Corporeal Phenomena in Male Patients’, presented at the Paris English seminar ‘Ordinary Psychosis’. Godbout, C. (2005) ‘The “Economic Problem” of Interpretation’, Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 13, 77–93. Grasser, F. (1998) ‘Stabilizations in Psychosis (transl. J. Stone)’, available at: http:// web.missouri.edu/∼stonej/t67894312xxxv.html (accessed 3 March 2014). Grigg, R. (2008) Lacan, Language, and Philosophy (New York: State University of New York Press). Grigg, R. (2009) ‘Language as Sinthome in Ordinary Psychosis’, Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 19, 33–44. Grigg, R. (2011) ‘Treating the Wolf Man as a Case of Ordinary Psychosis’, Culture/Clinic, 1, 78–88. Grinker, R. (1979) ‘Diagnosis of Borderlines: A Discussion’, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 5, 47–52. Grinker, R., Werble, B. and Drye, R. (1968) The Borderline Syndrome: A Behavioral Study of Ego-functions (New York: Basic Books). Gueguen, P.-G. (2004) ‘Symptomatic Homeostasis in Psychosis (transl. J. Richards)’, Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 12, 65–76. Gueguen, P.-G. (2005) ‘From Anxiety to the Name-of-the-Father’, Lacanian Com- pass,1,3–4. Gueguen, P.-G. (2011) ‘Who is Mad and Who is Not? On Differential Diagnosis in Psychoanalysis’, Culture/Clinic, 1, 61–78. Gunderson, J. (1979) ‘The Relatedness of Borderline and Schizophrenic Disor- ders’, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 5, 17–22. Hammersley, P., Langshaw, B., Bullimore, P., Dillon, J., Romme, M. and Escher, S. (2008) ‘Schizophrenia at the Tipping Point’, Mental Health Practice, 12, 14–19. Harari, R. (2002) How James Joyce Made his Name: A Reading of the Final Lacan (New York: Other Press). Hriso, P. (2002a) ‘The Theory of Automatism: A Conceptual Evolution of Psy- chosis’, in Hriso, P. (ed. and transl.) Mental Automatisms: A Conceptual Journey Into Psychosis, pp. 7–83 (Bayonne, NJ: Hermes Whispers Press). Hriso, P. (2002b) Mental Automatisms: A Conceptual Journey Into Psychosis (Bayonne, NJ: Hermes Whispers Press). Hriso, P. (2002c) ‘Clerambault’s Pathogeny of Psychosis: Neural Networks’, in Hriso, P. (ed. and transl.) Mental Automatisms: A Conceptual Journey Into Psychosis, pp. 65–86 (Bayonne, NJ: Hermes Whispers Press). Hriso, P. (2002d) ‘Conceptual Summary and Symptomatic Catalogue of Automatisms’, in Hriso, P. (ed. and transl.) Mental Automatisms: A Conceptual Journey Into Psychosis, pp. 387–447 (Bayonne, NJ: Hermes Whispers Press). Huber, G. (1992) ‘Cenesthetic Schizophrenia – A Subtype of Schizoprhenia Disease’, Neurology, Psychiatry Brain Research, 1, 54–60. Jenkins, G. and Rohricht, F. (2007) ‘From Cenesthesias to Cenesthopathic Schizophrenia: A Historical and Phenomenological Review’, Psychopathology, 40, 361–8. References 159

Joyce, J. (1939) Finnegans Wake (New York: The Viking Press). Kernberg, O. (1967) ‘Borderline Personality Organization’, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 15, 641–85. Kernberg, O. (1979) ‘Two Reviews of the Literature on Borderlines: An Assess- ment’, Schizophrenia Bulletin,5,53–8. Klotz, J.-P. (2009) ‘Ordinary Psychosis and Modern Symptoms’, Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 19, 21–32. Kripke, S. (1972) Naming and Necessity (Oxford: Basil Blackwell). Lacadée, P. (2006) ‘The Singularity of Psychic Reality: Psychoanalysis Applied to a Case of Ordinary Psychosis’, Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 15, 169–84. Lacan, J. (1946 [2006]) ‘Presentation on Psychical Causality (transl. B. Fink)’, in Miller, J.-A. (ed.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English, pp. 123–60 (New York: W.W. Norton and Company). Lacan, J. (1953 [2006]) ‘Response to Jean Hyppolite’s Commentary on Freud’s “Verneinung” (transl. B. Fink)’, in Miller, J.-A. (ed.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English, pp. 318–33 (New York: W.W. Norton and Company). Lacan, J. (1957 [2006]) ‘The Instance of the Letter in the Unconscious or Reason Since Freud (transl. B. Fink)’, in Miller, J.-A. (ed.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English, pp. 412–44 (New York: W.W. Norton and Company). Lacan, J. (1958 [2006]) ‘On a Question Prior to any Possible Treatment of Psy- chosis (transl. B. Fink)’, in Miller, J.-A. (ed.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English, pp. 445–88 (New York: W.W. Norton and Company). Lacan, J. (1966 [2006]) ‘The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious (transl. B. Fink)’, in Miller, J.-A. (ed.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English, pp. 671–702 (New York: W.W. Norton and Company). Lacan, J. (1972) ‘L’Etourtdit (transl. J. Stone)’, Scilicet,5–52. Lacan, J. (1979) ‘The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (transl. A. Sheridan)’, in Miller, J.-A. (ed.) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, 1964–65, Book XI (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books). Lacan, J. (1982) ‘Joyce the Symptom’, L’âne,6,1–5. Lacan, J. (1987) ‘The Case of Aimee, or Self Punitive Paranoia’, in Cutting, J. and Shepherd,M.(eds)The Clinical Roots of the Schizophrena Concept, pp. 213–26) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Lacan, J. (1993) ‘The psychoses (transl. R. Grigg,)’, in Miller, J.-A. (ed.) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, 1954–55, Book III (New York: W.W. Norton and Company). Lacan, J. (1998) ‘On Feminine Sexuality: The Limits of Love and Knowledge (transl. B. Fink), in Miller, J.-A. (ed.) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, 1972–73, Book XX (New York,: W.W. Norton and Company). Laplanche, J. and Pontalis, J. B. (1973) The Language of Psycho-analysis (transl. D. Nicholson-Smith) (New York: W.W. Norton and Company). Laurent, E. (2007) ‘Three Enigmas: Meaning, Signiﬁcation, Jouissance’, in Voruz, V. and Brousse, M.-H. (eds) The Later Lacan: An Introduction, pp 116–27 (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press). Laurent, E. (2008) ‘Ordinary psychosis’, presented at the Paris English seminar ‘Ordinary Psychosis’. Laurent, E. (2012) ‘Psychosis, or Radical Belief in the Symptom’, Hurly-Burly,8, 243–52. 160 References

Lecours, S. (2007) ‘Supportive Interventions and Nonsymbolic Mental Function- ing’, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 895–915. Lefort, L. (1980) Birth of the Other (transl. M. D. Ry, L. Watson and L. Rodriguez) (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press). Lety, S. (1985) ‘Schizotypal Personality Disorder: An Operational Deﬁnition of Bleuler’s Latent Schizophrenia?’, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 11, 590–4. Liebowitz, M. (1979) ‘Is Borderline a Distinct Entity?’, Schizophrenia Bulletin,5, 23–38. McDougall, J. and Coen, S. J. (2000) ‘Affect, Somatization and Symbolization’, The International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 81, 159–61. Mack Brunswick, R. (1928) ‘A Supplement to Freud’s “History of an Infantile Neurosis” ’, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 9, 439–76. McWilliams, N. (1994) Psychoanalytic Diagnosis (New York: Guilford Press). Maleval, J.-C. (2000) ‘Why so Many “Bordelines”?’, Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis,4. Meisser, W. W. (1981) ‘The Schizophrenic and the Paranoid Process’, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 7, 611–31. Miller, J.-A. (1997) ‘Joyce Avec Lacan (transl. J. Ayerza and C. Reynolds)’, Lacanian Ink, 11, 7–11. Miller, J.-A. (1998) ‘The Seminar of Barcelona: On Die Wege der Symptombildung’, Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 1, 11–65. Miller, J.-A. (2001) ‘The Symptom and the Body Event (transl. B. Fulks)’, Lacanian Ink, 19, 4–47. Miller, J.-A. (2002) ‘A Contribution of the Schizophrenic to the Psychoanalytic Clinic’, The Symptom,2. Miller, J.-A. (2003) ‘Lacan’s Later Teaching (transl. B. Fulks)’, Lacanian Ink, 21, 4–41. Miller, J.-A. (2004) ‘S(x) (transl. D. Collins)’, The Symptom,5. Miller, J.-A. (2006) ‘The Names-of-the-Father (transl. B. Fulks)’, Lacanian Ink, 27, 64–79. Miller, J.-A. (2007a) ‘The Sinthome, a Mixture of Symptom and Fantasy’, in Wolf, V.andVoruz,B.(ed.)The Later Lacan: An Introduction, pp. 55–104 (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press). Miller, J.-A. (2007b) ‘Interpretation in reverse’, in Voruz, V. and Wolf, B. (eds) The Later Lacan: An Introduction, pp. 3–9 (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press). Miller, J.-A. (2008) ‘The Invention of Delusion’, International Lacanian Review,V, 1–29. Miller, J.-A. (2009) ‘Ordinary Psychosis Revisited’, Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 19, 139–68. Miller, J.-A. (2010a) ‘The Wolf Man’ (transl. A. Alvarez). Lacanian Ink, 35, 7–65. Miller, J.-A. (2010b) ‘The Wolf Man II (transl. A. Alvarez)’, Lacanian Ink, 36, 6–85. Miller, J.-A. (2012) ‘The Real in the 21st Century’, available at: http://www.wapol.org/en/articulos/Template.asp?intTipoPagina=4& intPublicacion=38&intEdicion=13&intIdiomaPublicacion=2&intArticulo= 2493&intIdiomaArticulo=2#notas (accessed 3 March 2014). Mitrani, J. (1995) ‘Towards an Understanding of Unmentalized Experience’, Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 64, 68–112. References 161

Morel, G. (2008) ‘Investigations on the Onset of Psychosis: Entries into Psy- chosis (transl. M. Lopez)’, presented at the Paris English seminar: ‘Ordinary Psychosis’. Mullen, P. (2007) ‘A Modest Proposal for Another Phenomenological Approach to Psychopathology’, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33, 113–21. Owen, G. and Harland, R. (2007) ‘Editor’s Introduction: Theme Issue on Phe- nomenology and Psychiatry for the 21st Century. Taking Phenomenology Seriously’, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33, 105–7. PDM Task Force (2006) Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (Silver Spring, MD: Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations). Porcheret, B. (2008) ‘The Man With the Cracking Thumbs’, presented at the Paris English seminar ‘Ordinary Psychosis’. Porcheret, B., Cassin, R., Guéguen, P.-G. and Sauvagnat, F. (2008) ‘Corporeal Phe- nomena in Male Patients’, presented at the Paris English seminar ‘Ordinary Psychosis’. Rajender, G., Kanwal, K., Rathore, D. and Chaudhary, D. (2009) ‘Study of Cenesthesias and Body Image Aberration in Schizophrenia’, Indian Journal Psychiatry, 51, 195–8. Recalcalti, M. (2005) ‘The Empty Subject: Un-triggered Psychoses in the New Forms of the Symptom (transl. J. Jauregui)’, Lacanian Ink, 26. Rieder, R. (1979) ‘Borderline Schizophrenia: Evidence of its Validity’, Schizophre- nia Bulletin, 5, 39–46. Rogers, A. (2006) The Unsayable: The Hidden Language of Trauma (New York, NY: Ballantine Books). Rohricht, F. and Priebe, S. (2002) ‘Do Cenesthesias and Body Image Abberation Characterize a Subgroup in Schizophrenia?’, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 105, 276–82. Sadock, B. and Sadock, V. (2003) Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry (Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins). Sauvagnat, F. (2000) ‘On the Speciﬁcity of Psychotic Elementary Phenomena’, Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 1, 95–110. Sauvagnat, F. (2005) ‘Psychotic Anxiety and its Correlate in Bodily Experience: Some Remarks on “New Symptoms” ’, Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 14, 53–9. Schatzman, M. (1973) Soul Murder: Persecution in the Family (New York: Random House). Schreber, D. P. (2000) Memoirs of my Nervous Illness (New York: New York Review Books). Scorsese, M. (Director) (2004) The Aviator (Warner Bros). Skriabine, P. (2004) ‘The Clinic of the Borromean Knot (transl. E. Ragland and V. Voruz)’, in Ragland, E. and Milovanovic, D. (eds) Lacan: Topologically Speaking, pp. 249–67 (New York: Other Press). Skriabine, P. (2009) ‘Ordinary Psychosis with a Borromean Approach’, Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 19, 45–56. Spitzer, R. and Endicott, J. (1979) ‘Justiﬁcation for Separating Schizotypal and Borderline Personality Disorders’, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 5, 95–104. Stanghellini, G. (1994) ‘Body, Language and Schizophrenia’, available at: http:// www.rivistacomprendre.org/allegati/VII.9.%20Stangh..pdf (accessed 5 March 2014). 162 References

Stanghellini, G. (2009) ‘Embodiment and Schizophrenia’, World Psychiatry,1, 56–9. Stevens, A.-L. (2002) ‘What One Calls Untriggered Psychoses. Courtil Papers’, available at: http://www.ch-freudien-be.org/Papers/ (accessed 3 March 2014). Stevens, A. (2007) ‘Psychosis and the Paternal Function: Can One Choose One’s Father?’, Lacanian Compass,1,4–14. Stevens, A. (2008) ‘Mono-symptoms and Hints of Ordinary Psychosis’, Psychoanalytical Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 19, 57–67. Stone, M. (1979) ‘Assessing Vulnerability to Schizophrenia or Manic-depression in Borderline States’, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 5, 105–10. Svolos, T. (2008a) ‘Psychic Suffering and the Treatment Challenges of the Postmodern World’, presented at the Paris English Seminar ‘Ordinary Psychosis’. Svolos, T. (2008b) ‘Ordinary Psychosis: Note #1’, presented at the Paris English seminar ‘Ordinary Psychosis’. Svolos, T. (2009) ‘Ordinary Psychosis in the Era of the Sinthome and Semblant’, Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 19, 79–84. Taylor, G. (2003) ‘Somatization and Conversion: Distinct or Overlapping Con- structs?’, Journal of American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 31, 487–501. Tyrer, P. and Baldwin, D. (2006) ‘Generalized Anxiety Disorder’, The Lancet, 368, 2156–66. Vanheule, S. (2011a) ‘A Lacanian Perspective on Psychotic Hallucinations’, Theory and Psychology, 21, 86–106. Vanheule, S. (2011b) The Subject of Psychosis: A Lacanian Perspective (London: Palgrave Macmillan). Verhaeghe, P. (2004) On Being Normal and Other Disorders: A Manual for Clinical Psychodiagnostics (New York: Other Press). Verhaeghe, P. (2007) ‘Chronicle of a Death Foretold: The End of Psychotherapy’, available at: http://paulverhaeghe.psychoanalysis.be/artikels.html (accessed 5 March 2014). Verhaeghe, P. and Vanheule, S. (2005) ‘Actual Neurosis and PTSD: The Impact of the Other’, Psychoanalytic Psychology, 22, 493–507. Verhaeghe, P., Vanheule, S. and De Rick, A. (2007) ‘Actual Neurosis as the Under- lying Psychic Structure of Panic Disorder, Somatization, and Somatoform Dis- order: An Integration of Freudian and Attachment Perspectives’, Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 76, 1317–50. Voruz, V. and Wolf, B. (2007) ‘Preface’, in Voruz, V. and Wolf, B. (eds) The later Lacan: An Introduction, pp. vii–xiii (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press). Wachsberger, H. (2007) ‘From the Elementary Phenomenon to the Enigmatic Experience’, in Voruz, V. and Brousse, M.-H. (eds) The Later Lacan: An Introduction, pp. 107–15 (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press). Wachsberger, H. (2008) ‘Investigations on the Onset of Psychosis: Investiga- tions on a Concept (transl. M. Lopez)’, presented at the Paris English seminar ‘Ordinary Psychosis’. References 163

Wolf, B. (2005) ‘Joy Joys Joyce ...How to Work with the Sinthome?’, Psychoanalytical Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 13, 55–63. World Health Organization (1992) International Statistical Classiﬁcation of Diseases and Health Related Problems (Geneva: World Health Organization). Wulfring, N. (2009) ‘Editorial’, Psychoanalytic Notebooks of the European School of Psychoanalysis, 19. Index

actual neurosis, 74, 78–9, 81–2, 150, enigma, 35, 37–8, 45, 50, 65, 68, 70, 153, 162 109, 111, 113, 127–31, 135–6 actual pathology, 153 see also perplexity A-father, 37, 41, 45, 68–9, 95, 102–4, 106, 108–9, 110–12, 114 formations of the unconscious, 21–2, anxiety, 36–7, 44, 45–8, 73–4, 78–82, 72–4, 76–8, 82, 86, 92, 124–7, 150 86–9, 105, 109, 120, 133, 149–51 Freud, 4, 5, 11–12, 14, 21–4, 28, 59, ‘as-if’ phenomena, 10–12, 90, 96, 61, 66–7, 69, 72–5, 75–6, 79, 80–1, 151, 144 91–2, 96, 102, 104–6, 121, 124, attachment theory, 73, 80, 82–3 139–40, 147–8, 150–1, 153 automatisms, 2, 52, 56–9, 61, 70, 149 hole, 33, 36, 62–5, 69, 73, 88, 94, 96, athematic, 53–4, 58–60, 64 100–3, 108, 118–19, 129–32, affective, 56–7 142, 152 mental, 56–8, 63–4, 107 hypochondriasis, 15, 17, 26, 34, 39, motor, 56–7 42, 62, 69, 79–80, 86–8, 105–6, sensory, 56–7 108, 133, 137, 144, 150, 153 volitional, 56–7 imaginary identiﬁcation, 5, 11–12, 31, 38–9, 42, 45, 48, 51–2, 72, Bleuler, 2, 14–15, 55–7, 148, 151, 95–7, 99, 102–3, 121, 135, body events, 37, 116, 135–6, 141–2, 144 138–40, 153 interpretation, 48, 88, 89, 131, 137 Borromean knot, 44 jouissance code phenomena, 132–3 localisation, 24, 37, 39, 42–3, 50, 75, conversion symptoms, 34, 73–9, 133, 139 92 144 Others, 37, 49–50 see also neo-conversions Joyce, 98, 116, 120–2, 125–8, 138, 152

Kripke, 122–5 de Clérambault, 52–4, 56–61, 63–4, 70, 149 language disturbance, 19, 33, 63–5, delusional metaphor, 34–5, 43–4, 60, 94, 103, 107–8, 133 65, 80, 89, 91, 125, 131, 150–1 drives, 22, 81–2, 86–7 Mack-Brunswick, 69, 104–6, 151 DSM, 1–3, 6-9, 13–17, 54–5, 147 madness, 1, 3, 63 matheme, 103, 131, 140 elementary phenomena, 29, 32–3, 42, message phenomena, 131, 133–4 49–50, 52–4, 61, 63–8, 70–3, 77, metaphor, 19, 22, 51, 65, 87, 101, 103, 92, 125–31, 133–4, 137, 140, 142, 124, 126, 129, 151 144–5, 148 paternal, 115, 120

165 166 Index metonymy, 42–3, 65, 126, 129, 136 negative symptoms, 14, 16, 57, 96 mirroring, 56, 73, 81–7, 89–90, 92, 151 positive symptoms, 16, 26

Name-of-the-Father, reality testing, 9–10 functions, 115, 117–19, 121–2, 125, repression, 7, 11, 21, 32, 61, 74–7, 79, 130, 142, 148, 149, 151 96, 104, 118, 120, 151, 153 as supplementary device, 118 rigid designator, 122–5 narcissism, 10–11, 45, 69, 96, 106, 111 negative symptoms, 14, 16, 57, 96 Schreber, 23, 61–2, 65, 108, 132, 148, neo-conversions, 28, 72, 77, 79, 150, 153 91, 100 sexuality, 39–41, 69, 94, 101, 108–9, neologism, 43, 63–4, 127, 132, 149 112–13, 131 neurosis, signiﬁer in the real, 33, 43, 45, 53, 64, obsessional, 21, 69, 76, 104–5, 151 66, 70, 72–3, 77, 116, 121, 122–3, hysteria, 21, 74–6, 79, 151, 153 128–36, 138–40, 142 signifying chain, 33, 45, 60, 63–5, 87, object a, 81, 86, 121, 124, 151 101–3, 107–8, 125–6, 128–34, 140–2 perplexity, 18–19, 44, 63–4, 68, 70–1, sinthome, 5, 29, 43–5, 52, 73, 95, 98, 87–8, 92, 126–7, 131–3, 149 116, 120–2, 124–30, 132–5, 142, perversion, 12, 147–8, 150 144–6 phallic function, 38, 69, 94–5, 100–1, 106–8, 110–13, 149 psychiatry, transference, 8, 32, 39, 41, 86, contemporary, 1–2, 6, 8–9, 11–17, 88–9, 144 20–1, 29, 54–5, 57, 59, 90, 149 topology, 145, 151–2, 154 modern, 1–2, 53–5, 59–60, 63, 67, 69–71, 149, 152 unary trait, 121 psychoanalytic diagnostic manual untriggered psychosis, 4, 11–12, 25, [PDM], 9–10, 96 95–100, 113, 133–4, 147 psychosis schizophrenia/paranoia dichotomy, Verwerfung, 61 23, 31–2, 34, 88, 91, 93, 115, 148 Wolf man, 61, 68–9, 104–7, 111–12