DOCSLIB.ORG

Psychopathic Personality Traits and Somatization: Sex Differences and the Mediating Role of Negative Emotionality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Psychopathic Personality Traits and Somatization: Sex Differences and the Mediating Role of Negative Emotionality P1: MRM/SPH P2: MRM/RKP QC: MRM Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (JOBA) PP099-298982-03 March 13, 2001 10:23 Style file version Nov. 07, 2000 Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2001 Psychopathic Personality Traits and Somatization: Sex Differences and the Mediating Role of Negative Emotionality Scott O. Lilienfeld1,2 and Tanya H. Hess1 Although a number of investigations have provided evidence for an association between antisocial per- sonality disorder and somatization disorder, the variables underlying this association remain unknown. We examined the relations among measures of primary and secondary psychopathy, somatization, and negative emotionality (NE) in 150 undergraduates. Somatization was positively and significantly cor- related with measures of secondary, but not primary, psychopathy, and the relations between secondary psychopathy indices and somatization tended to be significantly stronger in females than in males. Some support was found for the hypothesis that the association between secondary psychopathy and somatization is mediated by NE, but not for the hypothesis that low levels of behavioral inhibition lead to somatization. Although the present findings are consistent with the possibility that somatization is a sex-differentiated manifestation of secondary psychopathic traits, replication of these findings in clinical samples will be necessary. KEY WORDS: psychopathy; antisocial personality disorder; somatization disorder; sex differences; negative emotionality. The phenomenon of “comorbidity,” or diagnostic mer syndrome is characterized by a chronic history of covariation, represents one of the foremost challenges antisocial and criminal behavior, whereas the latter is to contemporary psychopathology researchers (Caron & characterized by a chronic history of unexplained physi- Rutter, 1991; Frances et al., 1992). Such covariation is cal complaints (American Psychiatric Association, 1994; particularly rampant among Axis II disorders (Grove & Kirmayer, Robbins, & Paris, 1994). The covariation be- Tellegen, 1991) and is also prevalent between Axis I and tween ASPD and SD is superficially puzzling because Axis II disorders (Lilienfeld, Waldman, & Israel, 1994). these conditions share few, if any, overt diagnostic fea- Although the application of the term and concept of co- tures. A sizeable body of evidence suggests that ASPD morbidity to psychopathological syndromes is contro- and SD covary within both individuals and families (see versial (Lilienfeld et al., 1994; Spitzer, 1994), there is Cloninger, 1978; Lilienfeld, 1992, for reviews). a general consensus that a better understanding of the In a sample of 250 psychiatric patients, for example, covariation among diagnostic syndromes can provide Lilienfeld, VanValkenberg, Akiskal, and Larntz (1986) valuable leads for research on shared etiological factors found that ASPD and SD were significantly associated 3 (Maser & Cloninger, 1990). within individuals (rq = .55). Moreover, a significantly Of the comorbidities consistently reported in the psy- higher proportion of probands with SD than without chopathological literature, one of the most enigmatic has SD reported having a first-degree relative with ASPD been the association between antisocial personality dis- (rq = .63). More recently, Frick, Kuper, Silverthorn, and order (ASPD) and somatization disorder (SD). The for- Cotter (1995) found moderate and statistically significant 1Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 3 2To whom correspondence should be addressed at Department of Yule’s Q (rq) is an index of the magnitude of the association between Psychology, Room 206, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322; categories that is unaffected by the base rates of the disorders in question e-mail: [email protected]. (Fienberg, 1980). 11 0882-2689/01/0300-0011$19.50/0 C 2001 Plenum Publishing Corporation P1: MRM/SPH P2: MRM/RKP QC: MRM Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (JOBA) PP099-298982-03 March 13, 2001 10:23 Style file version Nov. 07, 2000 12 Lilienfeld and Hess correlations between dimensional measures of ASPD and Several authors (e.g., Goodwin & Guze, 1996; SD in a sample of 90 mothers of clinically referred chil- Lilienfeld, 1992) have further conjectured that ASPD dren. Although Boyd et al. (1984) found no covariation and SD are sex-differentiated manifestations of a shared between ASPD and SD in their analyses of the Epi- personality diathesis, although the precise nature of this demiological Catchment Area data, the low rates of SD diathesis remains to be determined. According to this in these data (approximately .1%) render these nega- hypothesis, males possessing this diathesis are likely to tive results difficult to interpret (see Cloninger & Guze, exhibit ASPD features, whereas females possessing this 1975; Cloninger, Reich, & Guze, 1975; Guze, Woodruff, diathesis are likely to exhibit SD features. This “sex dif- & Clayton, 1971, Liskow, Othmer, Penick, DeSouza, & ferentiation hypothesis” is consistent with data indicating Gabrielli, 1986, Robins, 1966; Spalt, 1980; Zoccolillo & that ASPD is more common in males than in females, Cloninger, 1986, for further data suggesting significant whereas SD is more common in females than in males levels of covariation between SD and ASPD, antisocial (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). This hypoth- behavior, or both, across individuals). In addition, both esis is also consistent with findings demonstrating that ASPD and SD are associated with an early age of on- males tend to exhibit higher levels of overt aggression set, chronic course, substance abuse, marital and famil- than females do (Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974), although ial discord, high rates of abuse and neglect of children, sex differences in “relational” (i.e., interpersonal) aggres- and poor response to psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy sion are less pronounced and perhaps even reversed in (Cloninger, 1978; Goodwin & Guze, 1996; Zoccolillo & direction (Eagly & Steffen, 1985; Werner & Crick, 1999). Cloninger, 1986). These similarities provide suggestive, Thus, one potential interpretation of this literature is that but by no means conclusive, evidence of shared etiologi- the personality diathesis underlying ASPD and SD tends cal origins for ASPD and SD. to be channeled into different phenotypes in males and Several authors (e.g., Carothers, 1975; Gorenstein females depending partly on levels of overt aggression. & Newman, 1980; Lilienfeld, 1992) have posited that Nevertheless, there is at present little direct evidence in the psychopathological correlates of SD extend beyond support of the sex differentiation hypothesis of ASPD and ASPD to psychopathic personality (psychopathy). Al- SD (but see Hamburger, Lilienfeld, & Hogben, 1996, for though measures of psychopathy tend to correlate mod- data suggesting that histrionic personality disorder and erately with measures of ASPD (Lilienfeld, 1994), the ASPD may represent sex-differentiated manifestations of former syndrome, unlike ASPD, is traditionally concep- psychopathic personality traits). The sex differentiation tualized as a constellation of covarying personality traits. hypothesis is not inconsistent with the previously noted These traits, which were first delineated systematically covariation between ASPD and SD (e.g., Lilienfeld et al., by Cleckley (1941/1982; see also Lykken, 1957; McCord 1986), because biological sex may serve primarily to shift & McCord, 1964), include guiltlessness, callousness, dis- slightly the phenotypic manifestation of the diathesis un- honesty, egocentricity, risk taking, poor impulse control, derlying ASPD and SD. As a consequence, males possess- and superficial charm. ing high levels of this diathesis may be somewhat more A number of authors have argued that ASPD is con- likely to exhibit ASPD features than SD features, and vice- siderably more etiologically heterogeneous than is psy- versa for females possessing high levels of this diathesis. chopathy and incorporates both “primary” (Cleckley) psy- The mechanisms underlying the association between chopathy as well as a m´elange of other conditions (e.g., ASPD and SD remain largely or entirely unknown. “neurotic psychopathy,” “dyssocial psychopathy”) that Lilienfeld (1992) reviewed several theoretical models that place individuals at heightened risk for antisocial behavior have been invoked to account for the ASPD–SD link. (Hare, Hart, & Harpur, 1991; Lykken, 1995). These latter Among these explanations are the behavioral disinhibition antisocial conditions are sometimes collectively referred model and the negative emotionality (NE) model. Accord- to as “secondary” psychopathy. Indeed, factor analyses of ing to the behavioral disinhibition model, both primary psychopathy measures have typically revealed two sepa- psychopaths (including some individuals with ASPD) and rable dimensions, one corresponding to the core affective individuals with SD are characterized by an underac- and personality deficits described by Cleckley, and the tive behavioral inhibition system (BIS) (Gorenstein & other corresponding to overt antisocial behavior (Harpur, Newman, 1980). Gray (1982) proposed that the BIS, a psy- Hare, & Hakstian, 1989). There is little evidence, however, chobiological system coursing through the septum, hip- bearing on the association between primary psychopathy pocampus, and orbitofrontal cortex, mediates sensitivity and SD, because virtually all controlled studies of the di- to conditioned signals of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Treating Somatization
    TREATING SOMATIZATION TREATING SOMATIZATION A Cognitive-Behavioral Approach Robert L. Woolfolk Lesley A. Allen THE GUILFORD PRESS New York London © 2007 The Guilford Press A Division of Guilford Publications, Inc. 72 Spring Street, New York, NY 10012 www.guilford.com All rights reserved Except as indicated, no part of this book may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher. Printed in the United States of America This book is printed on acid-free paper. Last digit is print number:987654321 LIMITED PHOTOCOPY LICENSE These materials are intended for use only by qualified mental health profes- sionals. The Publisher grants to individual purchasers of this book nonassignable permission to reproduce all materials for which photocopying permission is specifically granted in a footnote. This license is limited to you, the individ- ual purchaser, for use with your own clients and patients. It does not extend to additional clinicians or practice settings, nor does purchase by an institu- tion constitute a site license. This license does not grant the right to reproduce these materials for resale, redistribution, or any other purposes (including but not limited to books, pamphlets, articles, video- or audiotapes, and hand- outs or slides for lectures or workshops). Permission to reproduce these materials for these and any other purposes must be obtained in writing from the Permissions Department of Guilford Publications. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Woolfolk, Robert L. Treating somatization : a cognitive-behavioral approach / by Robert L.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Correlations Between Defence Mechanisms and Pathological Personality Characteristics
    rev colomb psiquiat. 2019;48(4):232–243 www.elsevier.es/rcp Artículo original Investigating Correlations Between Defence Mechanisms and Pathological Personality Characteristics Lucas de Francisco Carvalho ∗, Ana Maria Reis, Giselle Pianowski Department of Psicology, Universidade São Francisco, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil article info abstract Article history: Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between defence Received 4 October 2017 mechanisms and pathological personality traits. Accepted 10 January 2018 Material and methods: We analysed 320 participants aged from 18 to 64 years (70.6% women, Available online 10 February 2018 87.5% university students) who completed the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory (IDCP) and the Defence Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40). We conducted comparisons and cor- Keywords: relations and a regression analysis. Personality disorders Results: The results showed expressive differences (d>1.0) between mature, neurotic and Defence mechanisms immature defence mechanism groups, and it was observed that pathological personality Self-assessment traits are more typical in people who use less mature defence mechanisms (i.e., neurotic and immature), which comprises marked personality profiles for each group, according to the IDCP. We also found correlations between some of the 40 specific mechanisms of the DSQ-40 and the 12 dimensions of pathological personality traits from the IDCP (r ≥ 0.30 to r ≤ 0.43), partially supported by the literature. In addition, we used regression analysis to verify the potential of the IDCP dimension clusters (related to personality disorders) to predict defence mechanisms, revealing some minimally expressive predictive values (between 20% and 35%). Discussion: The results indicate that those who tend to use immature defence mechanisms are also those most likely to present pathological personality traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Mechanisms.Pdf
    Defense Mechanisms According to Sigmund Freud, who originated the Defense Mechanism theory, Defense Mechanisms occur when our ego cannot meet the demands of reality. They are psychological strategies brought into play by the unconscious mind to manipulate, deny or distort reality so as to maintain a socially acceptable self-image. Healthy people normally use these mechanisms throughout life. it becomes pathological only when its persistent use leads to maladaptive behavior such that the physical and/or mental health of the individual is adversely affected. The purpose of ego defense mechanisms is to protect the mind/self/ego from anxiety and/or social sanctions and/or to provide a refuge from a situation with which one cannot currently cope. Defense mechanisms are unconscious coping mechanisms that reduce anxiety generated by threats from unacceptable impulses In 1977, psychologist George Vaillant took Freud’s theory and built upon it by categorizing them, placing Freud’s mechanisms on a continuum related to their psychoanalytical developmental level. Level 1: Pathological Defenses The mechanisms on this level, when predominating, almost always are severely pathological. These six defense’s, in conjunction, permit one to effectively rearrange external experiences to eliminate the need to cope with reality. The pathological users of these mechanisms frequently appear irrational or insane to others. These are the "psychotic" defense’s, common in overt psychosis. However, they are found in dreams and throughout childhood as well. They include: Delusional Projection: Delusions about external reality, usually of a persecutory nature. Conversion: the expression of an intra-psychic conflict as a physical symptom; some examples include blindness, deafness, paralysis, or numbness.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypochondriasis and Somatization Disorder
    Ch14.qxd 28/6/07 1:36 PM Page 152 14 Hypochondriasis and Somatization Disorder Don R. Lipsitt CONTENTS 14.1 The Concept of Somatization . 153 14.2 Classification . 154 14.2.1 From DSM-I to DSM-III . 154 14.2.2 Case History (Part 1). 155 14.3 Diagnosis . 156 14.3.1 Hypochondriasis . 156 14.3.2 Somatization Disorder . 160 14.3.3 Case History (Part 2). 163 14.4 The Consultation-Liaison Psychiatrist’s Role in Somatization . 163 14.5 Conclusion . 164 On a busy day in a general physician’s office, perhaps 50% or more of the patients with physical complaints will have no definitive explanation for their ailment (Kroenke and Mangelsdorff, 1989). The patients present with distress from fatigue, chest pain, cough, back pain, shortness of breath, and a host of other painful or worrisome bodily concerns. For most, the physician’s expressing interest, taking a thorough history, doing a physical examination, and offering reassurance, a mod- est intervention, or a pharmacologic prescription suffices to assuage the patient’s pain, anxiety, and physical distress. But for some, these simple measures fall short of their expected result, marking the beginning of what may become a chronic search for relief, including frequent anxiety-filled visits to more than one physician, and in extreme cases even multiple hospitalizations and possibly surgery. The longer and more persistently this pattern appears, the more likely it will generate referrals to specialists for expert consultation, greater frustration in both the primary physician and the patient, and ultimately dysfunctional patient–physician relationships with inappropriate labeling of the patient as a “problem” or “difficult” patient, and perhaps even worse (Lipsitt, 1970).
    [Show full text]
  • O-P 28 Fares Srouji
    psychological factors in noncompliance among hemodialysis patients Srouji Fares Department of Nephrology, The Nazareth Hospital EMMS, Nazareth, Israel Noncompliance among HD patients • None-adherence is universally recognized as one of the major clinical issues in the management of ESRD among Hemodialysis patient. None Adherence Country Fluid Nutrition Medication ↓ intake Germany & U.S.A 72.3% 80.4% (N=456)1 Iran (N=237)2 45.2% 41.1% Turkey (N=154)3 95% 98.3% Italy (N=1238)4 52% India (N=150)5 37% The psychological impact of HD • Hemodialysis heavily violates the bio-psychosocial balance of the patient. • HD patient tend to use neurotic and immature defense mechanisms (i.e. reversal reaction, denial, dissociation, projection, somatization and Splitting)6-8 • Anxiety & Depression are the most common psychological issues among HD patient9 + Change in body image10,11 Low self-esteem12,13 10,14-15 + Dependence on the machine & clinical team Loss Hopelessness10,16 + Numerous restrictions 17-19 + Anxiety & Depression Ineffective psychological6-8 Defense/coping mechanisms Noncompliance20,21 Vaillant’s Levels of Defense Immature defenses Passive aggression, Acting out, Dissociation, Projection Autistic fantasy: Devaluation, Idealization, Splitting Neurotic (intermediate) defenses Intellectualization, Isolation, Repression, Reaction formation, Displacement, Somatization, Undoing, Rationalization Mature defenses Suppression, Altruism, Humor, Sublimation 4 The psychological impact of HD • Hemodialysis heavily violates the bio-psychosocial balance
    [Show full text]
  • Symptomatology and Comorbidity of Somatization Disorder Amongst General Outpatients Attending a Family Medicine Clinic in South West Nigeria
    Ann Ibd. Pg. Med 2014. Vol.12, No.2 96-102 SYMPTOMATOLOGY AND COMORBIDITY OF SOMATIZATION DISORDER AMONGST GENERAL OUTPATIENTS ATTENDING A FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC IN SOUTH WEST NIGERIA. A.M. Obimakinde1, M.M. Ladipo2 and A.E. Irabor3 1. General Outpatients Department, Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ekiti State, Nigeria. 2. General Outpatients Department, University College Hospital, Ibadan. 3. Family Physician Department, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Correspondence: ABSTRACT Dr. Abimbola M. Obimakinde Background: Individuals with somatization may be the most difficult to Family Medicine Department. manage because of the diverse and frequent complaints across many organ Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, systems. They often use impressionistic language to describe circumstantial Ekiti State. symptoms which though bizarre, may resemble genuine diseases. The E-mail: [email protected]. disorder is best understood in the context “illness” behaviour, masking Phone No.: 08028406568. underlying mental disorder, manifesting solely as somatic symptoms or with comorbidity. Objective: To evaluate somatization symptoms and explore its comorbidity in order to improve the management of these patients. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 60 somatizing patients who were part of a case-control study, selected by consecutive sampling of 2668 patients who presented at the Family Medicine Clinic of University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria between May-August 2009. Data was collected using the ICPC-2, WHO- Screener and Diagnostic Schedule and analysed with SPSS 16. Results: There were at least 5 symptoms of somatization in 93.3% of the patients who were mostly females. Majority had crawling sensation, “headache”, unexplained limb ache, pounding heart, lump in the throat and insomnia.
    [Show full text]
  • Altruism in Psychotherapy: Altruistic Acts As an Adjunct to Psychotherapy
    Pepperdine University Pepperdine Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations 2018 Altruism in psychotherapy: altruistic acts as an adjunct to psychotherapy Erin Santos Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd Recommended Citation Santos, Erin, "Altruism in psychotherapy: altruistic acts as an adjunct to psychotherapy" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 982. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd/982 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Pepperdine University Graduate School of Education and Psychology ALTRUISM IN PSYCHOTHERAPY: ALTRUISTIC ACTS AS AN ADJUNCT TO PSYCHOTHERAPY A clinical dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Psychology by Erin Santos August, 2018 Lou Cozolino, Ph.D. – Dissertation Chairperson This clinical dissertation, written by Erin Santos under the guidance of a Faculty Committee and approved by its members, has been submitted to and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY Doctoral Committee: Lou Cozolino, PhD, Chairperson Aaron Aviera, PhD, Elizabeth Laugeson, PsyD, Copyright by Erin Santos 2018 All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES
    [Show full text]
  • Do Spinal Cord-Injured Individuals with Stronger Sense of Coherence Use Different Psychological Defense Styles?
    Spinal Cord (2016) 54, 843–848 & 2016 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved 1362-4393/16 www.nature.com/sc ORIGINAL ARTICLE Do spinal cord-injured individuals with stronger sense of coherence use different psychological defense styles? J Shakeri1, M Yazdanshenas Ghazwin2, E Rakizadeh3, A Moshari4, H Sharbatdaralaei5, S Latifi2 and SAH Tavakoli6 Objectives: Although the importance of sense of coherence (SOC) and psychological defense mechanisms (PDMs) in the process of coping has been demonstrated, it has not yet been clarified whether individuals with stronger SOC use specificPDMs. Study design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Iran. Methods: Demographic and injury-related variables including injury level, time since injury, American Spinal Cord Association (ASIA) Scale and Spinal cord independence measure-III were collected among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). SOC was assessed by the Short-form Sense of Coherence Scale. PDMs were identified using 40-version of the Defense Style Questionnaire. Results: Neurotic defense style was the most commonly used style especially. The overall most commonly used PDM was ‘rationalization’, which was used by 95%. Individuals with stronger SOC used more mature style (P = 0.001, r = 0.52), particularly ‘humor’ and ‘suppression’ mechanisms (Po0.0001 and 0.024, respectively). There was a negative correlation between stronger SOC and the use of immature defenses including passive aggression (P = 0.001, r = − 0.51), acting out (P = 0.001, r = − 0.48), isolation (P = 0.009, r = − 0.50), autistic fantasy (P = 0.010, r = − 0.30) and somatization (Po0.0001, r = − 0.62). Married individuals had significantly stronger SOC (P = 0.01).
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Aspects of Hypochondriasis and the Somatization Syndrome
    Journal of Abnormal Psychology Copyright 1998 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 1998, Vol. 107, No. 4, 587-595 0021-843X/98/$3.00 Cognitive Aspects of Hypochondriasis and the Somatization Syndrome W i n f r i e d R i e f and W o l f g a n g Hiller Juergen M a r g r a f Roseneck Center for Behavioral Medicine University of Dresden The aim of this study was to evaluate whether specific cognitive aspects are present in patients suffering from somatoform disorders. With a sample of 493 patients from a center for behavioral medicine, the authors evaluated a questionnaire assessing typical cognitions concerning body percep- tion, illness behavior, and health. The authors further examined 225 participants, including patients with a somatization syndrome, patients with somatization syndrome and additional hypochondriasis, patients with hypochondriasis, patients with other mental disorders (clinical control group), and nonclinical controls. The results showed that not only patients with hypochondriasisbut also patients with somatization syndrome had cognitive concerns and assumptions that were specific for the disorder. These patients had a self-conceptof being weak and unable to tolerate stress. A catastrophiz- ing interpretation of minor bodily complaints found in hypochondriacal patients in earlier studies was also found for patients with multiple somatization symptoms. Somatization and somatoform disorders are one of the most somatoform symptoms out of the list of 35 symptoms proposed common problems in primary care. Following the results of for DSM-III-R somatization disorder. In the present article, Escobar, Rubio-Stipec, Canino, and Karno (1989), 4% of the we use the term somatization syndrome for these patients with participants in that study suffered from a somatization syndrome multiple somatic symptoms not due to a physical condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Somatic Symptoms and Depression
    Somatic Symptoms and Depression Wayne Katon, MD, and Joan Russo, PhC Seattle, Washington Patients with psychiatric illness frequently visit their medical physicians with somatic complaints or amplification of complaints about chronic medical illness, yet few of these patients meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Third Edi­ tion (DSM-III) criteria for a somatoform disorder. In a sample of 197 medical patients interviewed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, only 7.1% met DSM-III criteria for somatization disorder, but nearly one third of these patients met criteria for an abridged notion of somatization. Patients with current and lifetime major depression had significantly higher mean totals of positive somatic symptoms compared with controls who had no psychiatric disorder. Nearly one half of these patients with one or more depressive episodes in the course of their lifetime met the abridged criteria for somatization. This association of major depression with somatization is quite sim­ itar to findings from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area study suggesting that major depression, not the somatoform disorders, may be associated with most of the somatization seen in medical clinics. he use of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule1 (DIS) in and six or more medically unexplained symptoms for T the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study2 has women on the 37-item somatization disorder section of the enabled researchers to study the phenomenon of DIS). When this construct was applied to a community somatization in the general
    [Show full text]
  • Trends Psychiatry Psychother
    Tin Psychiatryrends and Psychotherapy Original Article Acute stress disorder and defense mechanisms: a study of physical trauma patients admitted to an emergency hospital Transtorno de estresse agudo e mecanismos de defesa: pesquisa com pacientes que sofreram trauma físico atendidos em um hospital de emergência Márcia Rosane Moreira Santana,1 Cleonice Zatti,1 Mariana Lunardi Spader,2 Bibiana Godoi Malgarim,1 Emílio Salle,3 Renato Piltcher,3 Keila Maria Mendes Ceresér,4 Andre Goettems Bastos,5 Lúcia Helena Freitas6,7 Abstract Resumo Introduction: Acute stress disorder (ASD) encompasses a set Introdução: O transtorno de estresse agudo (TEA) reúne um of symptoms that can arise in individuals after exposure to a conjunto de sintomas que pode surgir nos indivíduos após exposição traumatic event. This study assessed the defense mechanisms a um evento traumático. Este estudo verificou a relação entre o used by victims of physical trauma who developed ASD. estilo defensivo e o desenvolvimento de TEA e seus sintomas em Method: This was a controlled cross-sectional study of uma amostra de pacientes que sofreram trauma físico. 146 patients who suffered physical trauma and required Métodos: Este estudo transversal controlado envolveu hospitalization. A structured questionnaire was used to evaluate 146 pacientes que sofreram trauma físico e necessitaram ASD symptoms based on DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, in addition to hospitalização. Um questionário estruturado foi utilizado para the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ). avaliar sintomas de TEA, baseado nos critérios diagnósticos do Results: Ten participants (6.85%) received a positive diagnosis DSM-5, além do Questionário de Estilo Defensivo (Defense Style of ASD, and 136, (93.15%) a negative diagnosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Somatization in Primary Care
    Michael Kennedy, MFT – Division Director Somatization in Primary Care Michael Kozart, MD, PhD • Setting the Stage • In the most general sense, somatization refers to the presence of medical complaints that appear to be driven by psychological processes more than physical processes. • In a dynamic sense, somatization represents experiential avoidance: turning away from painful thoughts or feelings, and redirecting focus onto physical complaints. • Setting the Stage • PCPs encounter ‘perplexing complaints’ in up to 40% of their patients (McCarron 2006). • There is a huge overlap in symptoms between patients who are primary depressed, anxious, and somatic. • There has been a common misconception that the diagnosis requires somatic symptoms without a known medical cause. In actuality, what matters is not the absence of a medical disorder, but rather the presence of overwhelming and/or disproportionately intense medical complaints—there can be a root medical cause. • Setting the Stage—continued. • Identification is important not only to minimize patient distress, but to prevent exposure to unnecessary and/or dangerous health care interventions. • The DSM 5 Drastically changed the layout for Somatic disorders: • Elimination of antiquated and confusing labels under the heading, Somatiform Disorders: somatization d/o, hypochondriasis, somatic pain disorder, body dysmorphic disorder. Substitution of the simpler, Somatic Symptom Disorder. • Aforementioned emphasis on positive symptoms. • The Categorical View: • DSM 5: Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders • Somatic Symptom Disorder (F45.1) • One or more somatic symptoms that are distressing or result in significant disruption of daily life, usually 6 mnths. • Excessive thoughts, feelings, behaviors related to these symptoms as manifested by: • Preoccupation with medical complaints • Anxiety • Excessive time/energy devoted to medical symptoms • The priority is not the absence of a medical explanation for physical symptoms, but rather the presence of overwhelming physical symptoms—a departure from DSM-IV.
    [Show full text]