heenanblaikie.com
55
Suite
T
F
Michel
1866411
613.236.3488
Metcalfe
300
Bastarache
2699
Street
public
‘Canadian
Parliament,
the
mandates
Bill
the
(i.e.,
the
the
On
Division
Bill
likely
taxation
Freedoms
be
under
In
Re:
Dear
Attention:
Ottawa,
Mr.
June
1
Rideau
this
Minister
legislation,
analysis
a
constitutional
upheld
C-377
C-377
either
Terrance
division
Mr.
Constitutionality
02,
be
accountability
the
opinion,
ofpowers
justified
under
ON Western
and
2013
Oakey:
Street,
(“Charter”).
the
is
Constitution
adds
by
it
is
of
consistent
regulates
KIN
of
appears
to
Oakey federal
that
National
the
Mr.
section
Bank
I
powers
determine
a
Suite
as
heads
consider
is,
8S7
new
courts
Terrance
a
v.
with
or
the
reasonable
that
Alberta,
700
the 9
I
with
of
Revenue
analysis,
of
the
Act,
section
1(3)
conclude
“matter”
as
Bill
the
filing
the
power
respect
whether
provincial
the
of
2007
1867,
a
Oakey
validity
purpose
C-377
valid
the
to
Charter
of
limit
the
for
that,
assigned
SCC
to
to
the
financial
what
Constitution
as
first
which
public
under enactment
tax government).’
22
of
if
Income
well
of
at and
the
Bill
step
Bill
benefits
Bill
para
to
the
disclosure.
section
law
information as
that,
Paris C-377
Vancouver
Lawyers
Heenan
is
the
C-377
André
The
Peter
The
26.
Pierre The
DonaM The
The
Of
law
C-377
Tax
the
Heenan
to
Singapore
Counsel
Act,
is
Honourabte
Honourable
of Honourable
Right
Right
M.
Blaikie
level
in Bureau,
Marc
Patent
identify
R.
Victoria
essentially
essentially
afforded
BlaMe,
1
Act,
is
Honourable
Canadian
Honourable
Munroe,
Federal
any
Johnson,
in
of
1867.
and
LIP,
is
enacted
CC.,
According
Calgary
René
Michel
CC. Donald
Trade-mark of
light
the
an
to
case,
Q.C.
by
section
0.0.
Alberta
0.0.0.,
Jean
Dussault,
Pierre
government
the
Bastarache,
J.
Charter.
Montreal
provide
Moreover,
labour
Johnston,
to
Parliament’s
of
Agents
Chréhen,
Limited
relates.
Elliott
about
any
into FRSC
“pith
Charter
CC.,
the
labour
Blaikie
Toronto
Trudeau,
Liability
149.01.
CC.
to
P.C.
P.C.,
infringement
0.0.,
law,
organizations
division
transparency
falls
and
testimony
Ottawa
O.C.,
CC.,
Partnership
The
FRSC,
P.C.,
I
that
organizations.
it
of
Q.C.
O.M.,
substance”
Oudbec
conclude
under
CC.,
The
Ad.
would
objective
power
Rights
O.C.,
E.
enacted
C.H.,
of
Sherbrooke
section
Ad.
Q.C., before
powers
one
would
likely
E.
with
and
over
FRSC
that
and
Trois-Rivikres
of
of
of
it (1984-2000)
6
aras
at
Montreal
D.L.R. 2
information
rights
in presumptive
As
valid
seriousness
a
section
end
Even
Canadian
provisions
obligations
Further,
Quebec
Tessier
Kitkatla
Constitution 3 taxation,
labour
undertakings. 2
cases,
under Tessier
on
relation
Constitution they
Van
Insofar
section
income
and
Labour
15-11.
valid
the
noted,
labour
58-59.
of
Buren
(3d)
enactment
can the
if
under
Ltée
Ltée
provincial
the
area. 6 the
(Attorney
relations
Band Trust
149.01
section
would legislative
as
organizations
while
to
under
405
properly
the dues
Bridge
amateur
v.
Income
constitutional
v.
organizations,
labour
“the the
of
of
by
section
Co
v. interest
Quebec
on
Quebec (Que.
Act,
law
Moreover,
supports
the
British
the
labour not
is
make
[1943]
new
General)
section
As
received
149.01
Co.
raising
of
are
specific
sufficiently
laws
encroachment
C.A.).
is
1867.
athletic
determinative
be
relations Income
Tax
long
v. federal
(Commission
(Commission 92(13)
scheme.
not
provisions
in
a
Columbia
public
A.C.
Madawaska
organizations;
characterized
valid
are
were
the
was
v.
labour
Act,
8
of
See
a
as
The
analysis.
Lacombe,
by
section
of
536;
as
head
organizations,
exempt
money
organizations.
view
of
powers. 4
Peter
the
Tax
found
certain
upheld
the
does
enactment
opposed
labour
is
According
integrated
fact
the
(Minister
Société
relations
de
de
of
pith
address
(1958)
Hogg,
not
that
Act.
Act,
on
of
la
Constitution
la
2010
by
not
power
that
149.01
to
from
Section
sante
financial
the
as
sante
the
as
and
Asbestos
organizations
Bill
it
The
a
intrude
any
In
such
Constitutional
to
change
of
15
valid
does
the
SCC
falling
federal powers
constitutional
by
of
matters
within
taxation
exchange
Small
et
other
D.L.R.
et
substance
C-377 to
assigned
mode
degree
such
merely
de
section
Parliament’s
de
virtue 149.01
38
as
not
notwithstanding
the
v.
on
operations Heenan
la
Ia
at
Business,
the
under
Société
Act,
organizations
subsection
(2d)
the
sécuritJ
of
sécurité
power.
or para
attempt
does
provinces
of
as
ancillary
under
of
of
the
characterization
Law
provides
would
exclusively
system
for
only
federal
763;
fiscal
1867, may
or
registered 42.
integration
their
Parliament’s
nationale
not
other
analysis,
du
these
Tourism
in
matter
du
Abitibi
section
Blaikie
to
imposes
Though
of
powers.
Canada,
be
travail),
intrude
travail),
transparency
there
be
power
of
powers,
regulate
scheme,
powers
149.1(15),
these
head
for
deducted
benefits,
part
that
taxation”
associated
de
Power
of
and
to
149
is
charities
it
required
I
5th
2012
disclosure
2012
organizations.
on
‘amiante
of
over Bill
disclosure
Moreover,
the
the
of
they
still
is
Culture),
power
of
this
doctrine,
the
of
it
Edition
and
government. 5
provincial
instructive
the
provinces
SCC
SCC
will
C-377
provinces
the
a
property it
the
impose
singled
from
under
activities
or
Paper
would
federal
Income
with
appears,
(1981)
depends
to
23
and
Income
23
2002
law.
fiscal
be
Supplemented
make
of
requirements at
at
the
a Co.
is
upheld
as
tax
91(3)
para
out
para
not
disclosure
128
powers.
SCC
registered
taxpayer’s In
that
presence
fmancial
and
related
under
Tax
v.
integrity,
fact
long
of
have
benefits
the
Tax
on
laws several
federal
be
11.
Page
11.
31
of
such
other
civil
Act,
as
that
the
new
the
the
at
Act
the
as
to
a
a
in 2
8 R
under
accountability
Moreover,
court
of
Finally,
generalized
any
constitutionality, political
such
requiring
and
“reasonable
directors
Bill
the
to
capable
raise
Quebec
While
Bill
I
Conformity connection
in
increasing
be
law
order
head
According
opinion
organizations
v.
end
labour
require
construction
other Ruzic,
upheld
lobbying
C-377
interference
C-377
is
would
section
concerns
activities.
this
of
to
(Attorney
requiring
rationally
in
of
activities
Bill
be
government
organizations
2001
and
sections
my either
such
opinion
because
an
and
disclosure.
transparency
as
as
find
valid to
provides
with
estimate”
1
C-377
activities
opinion,
with
SCC
interpretation
sufficient trustees
a of
related
the or
General)
the
information.
that
that
valid
a disclosure
generalized
Charter
the
and
In
affect
is
or
with
24
reviewing
with
Supreme
of
Charter. respect
the
the
does
particularized
conforms
at
it
Charter.
my
functionally
is
for
to
the of
because
enactment
para
v.
limits
(149.01
or to
“rational
how
privacy
minor,
a
to legislation
privacy
Lacombe,
and
the
not
the
few
determine
opinion,
Income
employees
26.
validate
to
of
that
Court, It
their
constitute
percentage
public
freedom
court
disclosure
tax
disclosure
with
comments
individuals’
(3)(b)(vii)(vii. is
section
the
is
interests
functional
interests
important
2010
of
benefits,
money
connected
disclosure
constitutional
Tax
test
the
would
the
where
serves
accountability
according
federal how
SCC
of
with
149.01
section
a
Charter. 8
the
Act.
of
serious
association of
of
is
regarding
under
they
interpret
38
the
and,
any
political
test”.
impugned time
the
to
spent.
compensation
Heenan aggregate
statements
powers. 7
to
at
1)).
In
of
does
remember
under
encroachment
paras
spend
a
infringement
the
the important
to
my
encroachment
dedicated
notably,
and
The
As
valid
In
with
not
time
Charter,
this
any
41-45.
the
beliefs
under
long
opinion,
the
light
one
their
provision
portion
Here,
attempt
federal
Blaikie
amounts
provision
respect
possible
of
ancillary
spent
that,
interpretive
that
as
of
would
goals
section
money,
by
over
disbursements
and
the
Bill
section
both
would
on
of
if
is
a
such
by
legislative
to
on
to
could impugned
political
a
not,
court
the
the
C-3
of
inconsistency
100000$”
regulate
of
individual
powers
of
provincial
in
statutory
likely
tax
2(d)
it
persons
time
likely
these
77
law
transparency
149.01
power
a
courts
is
be
presumption
benefits
would
way
of
does
unlikely
must
activities
scheme,
interpreted
doctrine.
only
the
the dedicated
portion factors,
to
be
provision
that
will
as
of
to
persons
is
powers.
not
activities
“officers,
justified
Charter.
view
political
satisfy
the
provided
aimed
between
well
require
avoids
choose
appear
that
Page
it
of
in
and
other
may
will
this
on
of
as
the to
as
my
a
is
in
at 3 Page 4
Yours very truly
Heenan Blaikie LLP Aa4gAAj
Michel Bastarache
HBdocs - 14894410v1
Heenan Blaikie