DOCSLIB.ORG

In-Situ Measurement and Numerical Simulation of Linear

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In-Situ Measurement and Numerical Simulation of Linear IN-SITU MEASUREMENT AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF LINEAR FRICTION WELDING OF Ti-6Al-4V Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kaiwen Zhang Graduate Program in Welding Engineering The Ohio State University 2020 Dissertation Committee Dr. Wei Zhang, advisor Dr. David H. Phillips Dr. Avraham Benatar Dr. Vadim Utkin Copyrighted by Kaiwen Zhang 2020 1 Abstract Traditional fusion welding of advanced structural alloys typically involves several concerns associated with melting and solidification. For example, defects from molten metal solidification may act as crack initiation sites. Segregation of alloying elements during solidification may change weld metal’s local chemistry, making it prone to corrosion. Moreover, the high heat input required to generate the molten weld pool can introduce distortion on cooling. Linear friction welding (LFW) is a solid-state joining process which can produce high-integrity welds between either similar or dissimilar materials, while eliminating solidification defects and reducing distortion. Currently the linear friction welding process is most widely used in the aerospace industry for the fabrication of integrated compressor blades to disks (BLISKs) made of titanium alloys. In addition, there is an interest in applying LFW to manufacture low-cost titanium alloy hardware in other applications. In particular, LFW has been shown capable of producing net-shape titanium pre-forms, which could lead to significant cost reduction in machining and raw material usage. Applications of LFW beyond manufacturing of BLISKs are still limited as developing and quantifying robust processing parameters for high-quality joints can be costly and time consuming. LFW is a highly dynamic process involving rapid heating and deformation at high strain rate (of the order of 10 s-1). Currently, there is a limited ii fundamental understanding of the temperature and deformation transients during LFW which are critical parameters to study the joint quality. This dissertation research aimed to (1) develop and valid a physics-based process model and (2) apply it to study the effect of processing parameters and work-piece geometry on temperature and deformation transients during LFW. Given the broad scope, the research was performed in collaboration with Boeing Research & Technology (Berkeley, MO), EWI (Columbus, OH), and OSU’s CEMAS (Columbus, OH). The key innovations generated from this dissertation include: Optimized sample geometries for high-temperature, high-strain-rate mechanical tests based on thermal-electrical-mechanical numerical simulations Measured temperature and deformation transients in-situ during LFW Developed a computationally efficient 2.5-D model considering heat conduction, stress, and severe plastic deformation that was validated for different heat inputs and work-piece geometries Highlights of the research approaches and outcomes are described in the following. Numerical models based on thermal-electrical-mechanical simulation in ABAQUS®, a commercially-available finite element code, were developed to correct true stress-strain data for high-temperature compression test, and to design a new specimen geometry for hot torsion test. The modeling results increased the accuracy of the Ti-6Al-4V flow stress data tested at different temperatures and strain rates in Gleeble® at Boeing Research & Technology. Initial welding of sub-scaled Ti-6Al-4V coupons with one square inch weld area was performed on a 20-ton mechanically driven LFW machine in EWI. Three heat inputs iii designated as low, medium and high energy were tested. A high-speed camera was utilized to monitor the entire welding process for each weld. Type-K thermocouples were instrumented through drilled holes at four different offset distances from the weld interface for temperature measurement. Full-scaled Ti-6Al-4V welding coupons and net-shape pre-forms with weld area of five and nine square inches respectively were performed on an MTI LF 35-75 hydraulic LFW welder at Lightweight Innovations for Tomorrow (LIFT). Same welding parameters described previously were employed to produce full-scaled LFW joints. Black and white speckle patterns were painted onto the coupon side surfaces to map the surface deformation in-situ by digital image correlation (DIC) via a high-speed camera. An infrared camera was also utilized to measure the surface thermal profiles near the interface during heating and cooling of the LFW process. Machine recorded experimental data such as oscillator positions, applied forging force and resultant shear force were used to calculate the effective interface friction coefficient as a function of processing time via Coulomb’s friction law. This effective friction coefficient was then inputted into the LFW process model to describe the interface heat generation based on frictional-sliding behavior. The computational efficient 2.5-D models considered a transverse cross section that was perpendicular to the oscillation direction. The simulation procedure consisted of two stages: the conditioning stage and the merged stage. Modeling of the conditioning stage involved frictional heating while modeling of the subsequent merged stage involved only plastic deformation heating. The models were used to predict the temperature, stress and iv deformation for the three different heat inputs as well as the different coupon geometries. The modeling results were consistent with the experimental data including thermocouple and infrared camera measured thermal profiles, machine recorded axial shortening (or upset), surface strains measured by DIC, and the final flash shapes. The results presented in this dissertation, taken as a whole, represented a significant step toward establishing a predictive simulation of LFW process. Such a predictive simulation tool is essential to ensure sound joints and parts in current and future generations of energy-efficient structures. v Dedication Dedicated to my parents and Heting Li Their love and support make me strive to be a better person vi Acknowledgments As an undergraduate laboratory assistant and later a graduate research associate in the last six years at The Ohio State University Welding Engineering Program, I would like to acknowledge a lot of people who helped me to make this study possible. First of all, I want to express deep appreciation to my academic advisor Dr. Wei Zhang for his selfless guidance over years. His support, patience, professional expertise, encouragement, kindly reminders, and demand for excellence always inspired and motivated me for striding forward. He also gave me many opportunities to advance my research as well as my professional development, and these experiences have all became invaluable life lessons and unforgettable memories so far in my life. I feel truly blessed, fortunate, and honored to have had the chance to work with him, and this research would not have been possible without his devotion. I would also like to thank Dr. Boian Alexandrov and Dr. John Lippold for bringing me into the Welding and Metallurgy Group when I was an undergraduate. Without their teaching and guidance, I could never make myself this far. Gratitude must also be extended to Dr. David Phillips and Dr. Avraham Benatar for serving in my dissertation committee and providing many guidance as well as teaching welding-related courses in the past a few years. I would also like to acknowledge the project team that made this research possible. First, many thanks to Mr. Austin Mann from Boeing Research & Technology for vii collaborating and leading the project (TMP R4-6). He provided materials and process parameters into this project and also involved in Gleeble® testing and analyses, machining of materials and welds, and post-weld heat treatment with his colleague Mr. Sean Thuston. Second, I would like to acknowledge Dr. Samuel Kuhr and Prof. Hamish Fraser at OSU for doing the material characterizations at CEMAS and providing adequate guidance and comments. Many thanks to Dr. Mike Eff at EWI and Mr. Zachary Danko at MTI for making linear friction welds and generating welding-related experimental data. Last but not least, I wish to acknowledge the support and guidance from the LIFT program management office, in particular Bhavi Shah (TMP R4-6 project manager) for the overall project management and arrangement of welding in LIFT at Detroit. I would also like to extend thanks to many former and present faculty, staff, graduate and undergraduate students in the Welding Engineering Program for their support and help over years and to this study. Especially Dr. Xun Liu for providing in-situ monitoring tools, Dr. Carolin Fink, Dr. Ying Lu, Dr. Daniel Tung, Dr. Tyler Borchers, Dr. Yousub Lee, Dr. Hyeyun Song, Dr. Adam Hope, Dr. Jim Rule, Dr. Collin Whitt, Dr. Xuesong Gao, Mr. Alexey Kuprienko, Mr. Ed Pfeifer, Mr. Marc Ruggeri (DSI), Mr. Tyler High, Mr. Grant Pfeifer, and Mr. Menachem Kimchi for their generous help and shared wisdom both mentally and technically on academic and in life. Finally, my family and my girlfriend Heting Li deserve recognition for their support, love, faith, patience, and sacrifice while I worked on this research and dissertation. I love you all. viii Vita May 31, 1992………………………………………….... Born-Xi’an, China 2010-2014……………………………………………......B.S. Welding Engineering, The Ohio State University 2014-2016………………………………………………. M.S. Welding Engineering, The Ohio State University 2016-present…………………………………………….
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Residual Compressive Stress Strengthens Brittle Materials
    Residual Compressive Stress Strengthens Brittle Materials Effect of retained residual compressive stress on the ductility of the still hot and ductile subsurface the surface layer of brittle materials in reducing applied surface glass. As cooling continues, the sub­ tensile stress. Spring test data demonstrate the beneficial effect surface glass contracts against the rela­ tively cool and rigid surfaces, resulting of residual compressive stress in· the surface of hard steel. in residual tensile stress in the core and corresponding resiqual compres­ sive stress in the surface.' JOHN 0. ALMEN with glass specimens. Among the · ad­ The relative static strength of a Research Consultant vantages of glass for evaluating resid­ specimen of normal glass, which was ual stresses is that at ordinary tem­ carefully annealed to avoid residual UNDER CONDITIONS of br:ttlc fracture, peratures glass is completely brittle. stresses, and that of a similar glass specimen surfaces are weaker than For this reason, the residual stress pat­ specimen_that had been quenched on sound subsurface material. When such tern remains unaltered by plastic flow both surfaces as described in the pre­ relatively weak surfaces are residually to the instant of fracture. Also, any c:!ding paragraph is shown in Fig. 1. stressed in compression, the specimens apparent unorthodox behavior of glass As shown by the insert in Fig. 1, these will support greater tensile loads and will not mistakenly be attributed to specimens were ordinary -! in. plate will exhibit greater ductility because cold work or altered structure. glass, 3 in. wide and 18 in. long. Each the applied surface tensile stress is re­ Residual compressive stress in glass was placed on supports spaced 12 in.
    [Show full text]
  • MTI Friction Welding Technology Brochure
    Friction Welding Manufacturing Technology, Inc. All of us at MTI… would like to extend our thanks for your interest in our company. Manufacturing Technology, Inc. has been a leading manufacturer of inertia, direct drive and hybrid friction welders since 1976. We hope that the following pages will further spark your interest by detailing a number of our products, services and capabilities. We at MTI share a common goal…to help you solve your manufacturing problems in the most Table of Contents efficient way possible. Combining friction welding Introduction to Friction Welding 2 with custom designed automation, we have Advantages of MTI’s Process 3 demonstrated dramatic savings in labor and Inertia Friction Welding 4 material with no sacrifice to quality. Contact us Direct Drive & Hybrid Friction Welding 5 today to find out what we can do for you. Machine Monitors & Controllers 6 Safety Features 7 Flash Removal 7 MTI Welding Services 8 Weldable Combinations 9 Applications Aircraft/Aerospace 10 Oil Field Pieces 14 Military 16 Bimetallic & Special 20 Agricultural & Trucking 22 Automotive 28 General 38 Special Welders & Automated Machines 46 Machine Models & Capabilities 48 Friction Welding 4 What It Is Friction welding is a solid-state joining process that produces coalescence in materials, using the heat developed between surfaces through a combination of mechanically induced rubbing motion and Information applied load. The resulting joint is of forged quality. Under normal conditions, the faying surfaces do not melt. Filler metal, flux and shielding gas are not required with this process. Dissimilar Materials Even metal combinations not normally considered compatible can be joined by friction welding, such as aluminum to steel, copper to aluminum, titanium to copper and nickel alloys to steel.
    [Show full text]
  • Seebeck and Peltier Effects V
    Seebeck and Peltier Effects Introduction Thermal energy is usually a byproduct of other forms of energy such as chemical energy, mechanical energy, and electrical energy. The process in which electrical energy is transformed into thermal energy is called Joule heating. This is what causes wires to heat up when current runs through them, and is the basis for electric stoves, toasters, etc. Electron diffusion e e T2 e e e e e e T2<T1 e e e e e e e e cold hot I - + V Figure 1: Electrons diffuse from the hot to cold side of the metal (Thompson EMF) or semiconductor leaving holes on the cold side. I. Seebeck Effect (1821) When two ends of a conductor are held at different temperatures electrons at the hot junction at higher thermal velocities diffuse to the cold junction. Seebeck discovered that making one end of a metal bar hotter or colder than the other produced an EMF between the two ends. He experimented with junctions (simple mechanical connections) made between different conducting materials. He found that if he created a temperature difference between two electrically connected junctions (e.g., heating one of the junctions and cooling the other) the wire connecting the two junctions would cause a compass needle to deflect. He thought that he had discovered a way to transform thermal energy into a magnetic field. Later it was shown that a the electron diffusion current produced the magnetic field in the circuit a changing emf V ( Lenz’s Law). The magnitude of the emf V produced between the two junctions depends on the material and on the temperature ΔT12 through the linear relationship defining the Seebeck coefficient S for the material.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Temperature Measurements
    Reference Temperatures We cannot build a temperature divider as we can a Metal A voltage divider, nor can we add temperatures as we + would add lengths to measure distance. We must rely eAB upon temperatures established by physical phenomena – which are easily observed and consistent in nature. The Metal B International Practical Temperature Scale (IPTS) is based on such phenomena. Revised in 1968, it eAB = SEEBECK VOLTAGE establishes eleven reference temperatures. Figure 3 eAB = Seebeck Voltage Since we have only these fixed temperatures to use All dissimilar metalFigures exhibit t3his effect. The most as a reference, we must use instruments to interpolate common combinations of two metals are listed in between them. But accurately interpolating between Appendix B of this application note, along with their these temperatures can require some fairly exotic important characteristics. For small changes in transducers, many of which are too complicated or temperature the Seebeck voltage is linearly proportional expensive to use in a practical situation. We shall limit to temperature: our discussion to the four most common temperature transducers: thermocouples, resistance-temperature ∆eAB = α∆T detector’s (RTD’s), thermistors, and integrated Where α, the Seebeck coefficient, is the constant of circuit sensors. proportionality. Measuring Thermocouple Voltage - We can’t measure the Seebeck voltage directly because we must IPTS-68 REFERENCE TEMPERATURES first connect a voltmeter to the thermocouple, and the 0 EQUILIBRIUM POINT K C voltmeter leads themselves create a new Triple Point of Hydrogen 13.81 -259.34 thermoelectric circuit. Liquid/Vapor Phase of Hydrogen 17.042 -256.108 at 25/76 Std.
    [Show full text]
  • Type T Thermocouple Copper-Constantan Temperature Vs Millivolt Table Degree C
    Technical Information Data Bulletin Type T Thermocouple Copper­Constantan T Extension Grade Temperature vs Millivolt Table Thermocouple Grade E + Copper Reference Junction 32°F + Copper M Temperature Range Maximum Thermocouple Grade Maximum Useful Temperature Range: Temperature Range P Thermocouple Grade: ­328 to 662°F –454 to 752°F ­ Consrantan ­200 to 350°C –270 to 400°C ­ Consrantan E Extension Grade: ­76 to 212°F Accuracy: Standard: 1.0°C or 0.75% ­60 to 100°C Special: 0.5°C or 0.4% R Recommended Applications: A Mild Oxidizing,Reducing Vacuum or Inert Environments. Good Where Moisture Is Present. Low Temperature Applications. T Temp0­1­2­3­4­5­6­7­8­9 U ­450 ­6.2544 ­6.2553 ­6.2562 ­6.2569 ­6.2575 ­440 ­6.2399 ­6.2417 ­6.2434 ­6.2451 ­6.2467 ­6.2482 ­6.2496 ­6.2509 ­6.2522 ­6.2533 R ­430 ­6.2174 ­6.2199 ­6.2225 ­6.2249 ­6.2273 ­6.2296 ­6.2318 ­6.2339 ­6.2360 ­6.2380 ­420 ­6.1873 ­6.1907 ­6.1939 ­6.1971 ­6.2002 ­6.2033 ­6.2062 ­6.2091 ­6.2119 ­6.2147 E ­410 ­6.1498 ­6.1539 ­6.1579 ­6.1619 ­6.1657 ­6.1695 ­6.1732 ­6.1769 ­6.1804 ­6.1839 ­400 ­6.1050 ­6.1098 ­6.1145 ­6.1192 ­6.1238 ­6.1283 ­6.1328 ­6.1372 ­6.1415 ­6.1457 ­390 ­6.0530 ­6.0585 ­6.0640 ­6.0693 ­6.0746 ­6.0799 ­6.0850 ­6.0901 ­6.0951 ­6.1001 & ­380 ­5.9945 ­6.0006 ­6.0067 ­6.0127 ­6.0187 ­6.0245 ­6.0304 ­6.0361 ­6.0418 ­6.0475 ­370 ­5.9299 ­5.9366 ­5.9433 ­5.9499 ­5.9564 ­5.9629 ­5.9694 ­5.9757 ­5.9820 ­5.9883 ­360 ­5.8598 ­5.8671 ­5.8743 ­5.8814 ­5.8885 ­5.8955 ­5.9025 ­5.9094 ­5.9163 ­5.9231 P ­350 ­5.7847 ­5.7924 ­5.8001 ­5.8077 ­5.8153 ­5.8228 ­5.8303 ­5.8378 ­5.8452
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Thermocouples and Thermocouple Assemblies
    Introduction to Thermocouples and Thermocouple Assemblies What is a thermocouple? relatively rugged, they are very often thermocouple junction is detached from A thermocouple is a sensor for used in industry. The following criteria the probe wall. Response time is measuring temperature. It consists of are used in selecting a thermocouple: slower than the grounded style, but the two dissimilar metals, joined together at • Temperature range ungrounded offers electrical isolation of one end, which produce a small unique • Chemical resistance of the 1 GΩ at 500 Vdc for diameters voltage at a given temperature. This thermocouple or sheath material ≥ 0.15 mm and 500 MΩ at 50 Vdc for voltage is measured and interpreted by • Abrasion and vibration resistance < 0.15 mm diameters. The a thermocouple thermometer. • Installation requirements (may thermocouple in the exposed junction need to be compatible with existing style protrudes out of the tip of the What are the different equipment; existing holes may sheath and is exposed to the thermocouple types? determine probe diameter). surrounding environment. This type Thermocouples are available in different offers the best response time, but is combinations of metals or ‘calibrations.’ How do I know which junction type limited in use to dry, noncorrosive and The four most common calibrations are to choose? (also see diagrams) nonpressurized applications. J, K, T and E. There are high temperature Sheathed thermocouple probes are calibrations R, S, C and GB. Each available with one of three junction What is ‘response time’? calibration has a different temperature types: grounded, ungrounded or A time constant has been defined range and environment, although the exposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Friction Stir Welding of Aluminium Alloy AA5754 to Steel DX54
    Aalto University School of Engineering Department of Engineering Design and Production Hao Wang Friction Stir Welding of Aluminium Al- loy AA5754 to Steel DX54: Lap Joints with Conventional and New Solu- tion Thesis submitted as a partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Technology. Espoo, October 27, 2015 Supervisor: Prof. Pedro Vila¸ca Advisors: Tatiana Minav Ph.D. Aalto University School of Engineering ABSTRACT OF Department of Engineering Design and Production MASTER'S THESIS Author: Hao Wang Title: Friction Stir Welding of Aluminium Alloy AA5754 to Steel DX54: Lap Joints with Conventional and New Solution Date: October 27, 2015 Pages: 100 Major: Mechanical Engineering Code: IA3027 Supervisor: Professor Pedro Vila¸ca Advisors: Tatiana Minav Ph.D. The demand for joining of aluminum to steel is increasing in the automotive industry. There are solutions based on Friction Stir Welding (FSW) implemented to join these two dissimilar metals but these have not yet resulted in a reliable joint for the automotive industrial applications. The main reason is the brittle intermetallic compounds (IMCs) that are prone to form in the weld region. The objective of this thesis was to develop and test an innovative overlap joint concept, which may improve the quality of the FSW between aluminum alloy AA5754-H22 (2 mm) and steel DX54 (1.5 mm) for automotive applications. The innovative overlap joint concept consists of an interface with a wave shape produced on the steel side. The protrusion part of the shape will be directly processed by the tip of the probe with the intention of improving the mechanical resistance of the joint due to localized heat generation, extensive chemically active surfaces and extra mechanical interlocking.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermocouple Standards Platinum / Platinum Rhodium
    Thermocouple Standards 0 to 1600°C Platinum / Platinum Rhodium Type R & S Standard Thermocouple, Model 1600, Premium grade wire, gas tight assembly, g Type R and Type S No intermediate junctions. g Gas Tight Assembly g Premium Grade Wire The Isothermal range of Thermocouple Standards are the result of many years development. The type R and S standards will cover the range from 0°C to 1600°C. The measuring assembly comprises a 7mm x 300mm or 600mm gas tight 99.7% recrystallized alumina sheath inside which is a 2.5mm diameter twin bore tube holding the thermocouple. The inner 2.5mm assembly is removable since some calibration laboratories will only accept fine bore tubed thermocouples and some applications require fine bore tubing. The covered noble metal thermocouple wire connects the Also available without the physical cold junction - Specify No Cold Junction (NCJ). measuring sheath to the reference sheath which is a 4.5mm x 250mm stainless steel sheath suitable for Model 1600 referencing in a 0°C reference system. Two thermo electrically free multistrand copper wires (teflon coated) Hot Sheath connect the thermocouple to the voltage measuring device. Temperature Range 0°C to 1600°C (R or S) Emf Vs Temperature According to relevant document The thermocouple material is continuous from the hot or measuring junction to the cold, or referencing junction. Response Time 5 minutes Hot Junction see diagram Calibration Dimensions The 1600 is supplied with a certificate giving the error Connecting Cable see diagram between the ideal value and the actual emf of the thermo- couple at the gold point.
    [Show full text]
  • Specifications Overview Compatible Thermocouple Sensors Connecting
    HOBO® U12 J, K, S, T Thermocouple Data Logger (Part # U12-014) Inside this package: Thank you for purchasing a HOBO data logger. With proper care, it will give you years of accurate and reliable • HOBO U12 J, K, S, T measurements. Thermocouple Data Logger The HOBO U12 J, K, S, T Thermocouple data logger has a • Mounting kit with magnet, 12-bit resolution and can record up to 43,000 measurements hook-and-loop tape, tie- or events. The logger accepts J, K, S, and T type wrap mount, tie wrap, and thermocouple sensors, sold separately. The logger uses a two screws. direct USB interface for launching and data readout by a Doc # 13412-B, MAN-U12014 computer. Onset Computer Corporation An Onset software starter kit is required for logger operation. Visit www.onsetcomp.com for compatible software. Specifications Overview J type: 0 to 750 °C (32° to 1382°F) The U12 Thermocouple logger has two temperature channels. K type: 0 to 1250 °C (32° to 2282°F) Channel 1 is for a user-attached thermocouple. Channel 2 is the Measurement S type: -50 to 1760 °C (-58° to 3200°F) logger’s internal temperature, which is used for cold-junction range T type: -200 to 100 °C (-328° to 212°F) compensation of the thermocouple output. The logger can also Internal temperature: 0° to 50°C (32° to record the logger’s battery voltage (Channel 3) if selected. The 122°F) number of channels selected determines the maximum J type: ±2.5°C or 0.5% of reading, deployment time at a given sample interval.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotational Friction Welding Flyer
    ROTATIONAL FRICTION WELDING MANUFACTURINGMANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY,TECHNOLOGY, INC MTI is a world leader in designing and manufacturing friction welders, and offers a full line of all three TOP TEN ADVANTAGES: main types of Rotational Friction Welding machines — . 1 The machine-controlled process Inertia, Direct Drive, and Hybrid. eliminates human error—weld quality is independent of operator skill. 2 Dissimilar metals can be joined— even some considered incompatible WHAT IS ROTATIONAL FRICTION WELDING? or unweldable. Rotational Friction Welding is a solid-state joining process that produces coalescence . 3 Consumables are not required— in metals, or non-metals using the heat developed between two surfaces by a no flux, filler material, or shielding combination of mechanically-induced rotational rubbing motion and applied load. gases are needed. Under normal conditions, the fraying surfaces do not melt. 4 Only creates a narrow heat-affected zone, which results in more uniform There are three basic types of Rotational Friction Welding: Inertia Welding, Direct properties throughout the part, higher joint efficiencies, and stronger welds. Drive Welding, and Hybrid. Other variations include: Radial, Orbital, Linear or Reciprocating Welding and Friction Stir Welding. 5 The 100% bond of the contact area creates joints of forged quality. WHY ROTATIONAL FRICTION WELDING? . 6 Reduces raw material and machining costs when replacing forgings. Rotational Friction Welding does not compromise the integrity of the parent materials during welding – resulting in stronger welds, more uniform part properties, and . 7 Environmentally friendly, producing higher joint efficiencies. Even materials and geometries deemed unweldable are able to no smoke, fumes, or slag. be joined using Rotational Friction Welding.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Friction Welding for Corrosion Control in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry Proserv UK To: Icorr, Aberdeen Branch 27.01.2015
    The Use of Friction Welding for Corrosion Control in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry Proserv UK To: Icorr, Aberdeen Branch 27.01.2015 Dave Gibson - Technical Authority, Friction Welding [email protected] Our Evolution What We Do: Life of Field Services Business Division What We Offer Solutions & Services • BOP Services Drilling Control Products and services • Drilling Control Systems Assurance & Performance Systems (DCS) focussed on operational • After-market & Lifecycle Management assurance Production Equipment Products and services • Flow Assurance & Sampling Solutions Systems (PES) focussed on production • Production Control & Safety Solutions optimisation • Asset Performance & Operational Integrity Products, services and • Subsea Marginal Field Development Subsea Production system design focused on • Subsea Brownfield Extension, Upgrade & Optimisation Systems (SPS) production enhancement • Obsolescence Management • Subsea Life of Field Services & Support • Subsea Infrastructure, Repair & Maintenance Products and services • Emergency Pipeline Repair Marine Technology focused on intervention and • Diverless Intervention Services (MTS) remediation to assure asset • Wellhead Abandonment & Decommissioning integrity • Friction Welding Summary 1. Why use Friction Welding Chosen for Corrosion Control ? 2. The Portable Friction Welding Process 3. Fatigue Strength of Friction Welds 4. Subsea Friction Welding Tooling 5. Subsea applications of Friction Welding for Cathodic Protection 6. Topside friction welding tooling 7. Topside applications of Friction welding for corrosion control 8. Corrosion Sensor Attachment Why is Friction Welding Chosen for Corrosion Control? Subsea • Welded, low electrical resistance, low maintenance connection • Suitable for large flat surfaces where clamps can’t be used (e.g. FPSO hulls, large diameter jacket legs and wind farm piles) • Better fatigue strength than arc welds in the “as welded” condition • When used with an ROV lower vessel costs and rapid installation.
    [Show full text]
  • 11283: Engineered Residual Stress to Mitigate Stress Corrosion Cracking
    Paper No. 2011 11283 Engineered Residual Stress to Mitigate Stress Corrosion Cracking of Stainless Steel Weldments Jeremy E. Scheel, N. Jayaraman, Douglas J. Hornbach Lambda Technologies 5521 Fair Lane Cincinnati, OH, 45227-3401 USA ABSTRACT Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) is the result of the combined influence of tensile stress and a corrosive environment on a susceptible material. Austenitic stainless steels including types 304L and 316L are susceptible alloys commonly used in nuclear weldments. An engineered residual stress field can be introduced into the surface of components that can reliably produce thermo-mechanically stable, deep compressive residual stresses to mitigate SCC. The stability of the residual stresses is dependant on the amount of cold working produced during surface enhancement processing. Three different symmetrical geometries of weld mockups were processed using low plasticity burnishing (LPB) to produce the desired compressive residual stress field on half of each specimen. SCC testing in boiling MgCl2 was performed to compare the LPB treated and un-treated 304L and 316L stainless steel weldments. X-ray diffraction residual stress analyses were used to document the respective residual stress fields and percent cold working of each condition. Testing was performed to quantify the thermo-mechanical stability of the residual stresses. The un-treated weldments suffered severe SCC damage due to the residual tension from the welding operation. The results show conclusively that LPB completely mitigated SCC in the tested weldments and provided thermo-mechanically stable, deep residual compression. KEYWORDS: Stress Corrosion Cracking, Low Plasticity Burnishing, Residual Stress, Weldments, Nuclear Reactor, Stainless Steel. ©2011 by NACE International. Requests for permission to publish this manuscript in any form, in part or in whole, must be in writing to NACE International, Publications Division, 1440 South Creek Drive, Houston, Texas 77084.
    [Show full text]