DOCSLIB.ORG

North London Line & Thameside

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North London Line & Thameside This Route Plan is part of a set. 2009 Plans Route Route Plans 2009 To view or download the others Route 6 visit www.networkrail.co.uk North London Line and Thameside Note Other documents in the Delivery Plan This Route Plan forms part of the Control Period 4 6 Route (CP4) Delivery Plan and supersedes the version can be found on the Network Rail website published in April 2008. www.networkrail.co.uk North Key to route diagrams London 03 KEY Junction Station name Station Station 01 STATION Station name name name name 02 Junction KEY STATION Junction name Line A A name 1 B 04 KEY STATION KEY STATION and Thameside Capacity and operational constraints Track descriptions A Location: capacity or operational constraint The colour of the line denotes the route classification Issues on the route 1 Primary Location: issue on the route London and South East commuter Secondary Key planned projects A Rural Location: planned project on the route Freight only Strategic route sections 01 The line shading indicates strategic route sections Listed in the appendix of the route plan which are numbered on the map The width of the line denotes the number of tracks Other symbols Multiple track Key station location Double track KEY STATION Key station on this route Single track KEY STATION Key station on another route Connecting local Other station location Other lines are shown as follows: Station name Other station on this route Line on other route Junction name Junction / other landmark Non Network Rail infrastructure Non operational line communities GRIP stages 1 Output definition 2 Pre-feasibility 3 Option selection 4 Single option selection 5 Detailed design 6 Construction, test and commission 7 Scheme hand back 8 Project close out Cover printed on box board which is both FSC and TCF. Text pages printed on Greencoat Velvet which is produced Network Rail from pulp containing 80% recycled fibre. The remaining Kings Place 20% virgin pulp is 10% totally chlorine free and 10% elemental chlorine free. Greencoat has been awarded both the National 90 York Way Association of Paper Merchants and the Eugropa recycled London N1 9AG marks, two of the most prestigious and recognisable recycled certificates available. Tel: 020 3356 9595 2009 CDS008/March Network Rail helps bring Britain together. We own, operate and maintain the rail network, delivering improved standards of safety, reliability and efficiency. Our investment programme to enhance and modernise the network is the most ambitious it has ever been. Delivering a 21st century railway for our customers and society at large. Every day. Everywhere. NET01 59_Route Plan fold outs.qxd:405 x 297 25/3/09 17:59 Page 11 Route 6 North London Line Rail Regulation on 18 February 2008. The GA Today’s route RUS covers the period to 2021, but also includes The two principal elements of the NLL and and Thameside a longer term view of the strategy for meeting Thameside route are described below. The continued growth. relevant Strategic Route Section is shown in brackets: The Eastern Regional Planning Assessment (RPA), covering the period from 2011 to 2021, • the NLL which comprises the Richmond to was published by the Department for Transport Stratford route (06.01, 06.06, 06.07 and (DfT) on 16 February 2006. The RPA sets out 06.09), the Gospel Oak to Barking route scenarios of continuing growth in commuting to (06.03 and 06.05), the Dudding Hill lines (the the centre of London and Docklands. However freight route between Cricklewood, on the parts of the current NLL and Thameside route Midland Main Line (MML), and Acton Wells Jn are already operating at or close to capacity in – 06.10) and associated connections to all of terms of train paths. London’s main radial routes • the Thameside route comprises the main line The CL RUS looked at options and between Fenchurch Street and Shoeburyness recommendations for accommodating future (06.02), and the Tilbury Loop together with a growth, and options proposed by the CL RUS line connecting Chafford Hundred station have been further developed for implementation (adjacent to the Lakeside shopping complex) under the North London Route Improvement with Upminster and Grays (06.04). There is Project (NLRIP). The GA RUS has looked at also a freight only branch line to Thames options and recommendations for Haven (part of 06.08). accommodating future growth on the Thameside part of the route and these recommendations are being taken forward in Control Period 4 (CP4) to meet the capacity metrics set by the Department for Transport in their High Level Output Specification (HLOS) published in July 2007. Section 1: Today’s railway The main markets are commuter and leisure journeys into and around London, in particular Route context to the City, Docklands and North London from The North London Line (NLL) is a vital part of Essex and the Thames gateway (as well as the London’s transport infrastructure and a major link London boroughs). between key arterial routes to and from the capital. It is a nationally important freight route The NLL part of the route is included in the Cross and provides a key urban passenger service London Route Utilisation Strategy (CL RUS), around London with connections to/from every which was published by Network Rail in August arterial route north, east and west of London. 2006 and established by the Office of Rail Regulation on 30 October 2006. The CL RUS The Thameside route runs from London proposed a range of measures for meeting Fenchurch Street to Shoeburyness, with a loop growth on London’s orbital routes up to 2016. line between Barking and Pitsea via Tilbury and a branch between Upminster and Grays, which The Thameside part of the route is included in carries a mixture of commuter and leisure traffic, the Greater Anglia Route Utilisation Strategy (GA and substantial freight movements to and from RUS), which was published by Network Rail in North Thameside. December 2007 and established by the Office of NET01 59_Route Plan fold outs.qxd:405 x 297 25/3/09 17:59 Page 11 Route 6 North London Line Rail Regulation on 18 February 2008. The GA Today’s route RUS covers the period to 2021, but also includes The two principal elements of the NLL and and Thameside a longer term view of the strategy for meeting Thameside route are described below. The continued growth. relevant Strategic Route Section is shown in brackets: The Eastern Regional Planning Assessment (RPA), covering the period from 2011 to 2021, • the NLL which comprises the Richmond to was published by the Department for Transport Stratford route (06.01, 06.06, 06.07 and (DfT) on 16 February 2006. The RPA sets out 06.09), the Gospel Oak to Barking route scenarios of continuing growth in commuting to (06.03 and 06.05), the Dudding Hill lines (the the centre of London and Docklands. However freight route between Cricklewood, on the parts of the current NLL and Thameside route Midland Main Line (MML), and Acton Wells Jn are already operating at or close to capacity in – 06.10) and associated connections to all of terms of train paths. London’s main radial routes • the Thameside route comprises the main line The CL RUS looked at options and between Fenchurch Street and Shoeburyness recommendations for accommodating future (06.02), and the Tilbury Loop together with a growth, and options proposed by the CL RUS line connecting Chafford Hundred station have been further developed for implementation (adjacent to the Lakeside shopping complex) under the North London Route Improvement with Upminster and Grays (06.04). There is Project (NLRIP). The GA RUS has looked at also a freight only branch line to Thames options and recommendations for Haven (part of 06.08). accommodating future growth on the Thameside part of the route and these recommendations are being taken forward in Control Period 4 (CP4) to meet the capacity metrics set by the Department for Transport in their High Level Output Specification (HLOS) published in July 2007. Section 1: Today’s railway The main markets are commuter and leisure journeys into and around London, in particular Route context to the City, Docklands and North London from The North London Line (NLL) is a vital part of Essex and the Thames gateway (as well as the London’s transport infrastructure and a major link London boroughs). between key arterial routes to and from the capital. It is a nationally important freight route The NLL part of the route is included in the Cross and provides a key urban passenger service London Route Utilisation Strategy (CL RUS), around London with connections to/from every which was published by Network Rail in August arterial route north, east and west of London. 2006 and established by the Office of Rail Regulation on 30 October 2006. The CL RUS The Thameside route runs from London proposed a range of measures for meeting Fenchurch Street to Shoeburyness, with a loop growth on London’s orbital routes up to 2016. line between Barking and Pitsea via Tilbury and a branch between Upminster and Grays, which The Thameside part of the route is included in carries a mixture of commuter and leisure traffic, the Greater Anglia Route Utilisation Strategy (GA and substantial freight movements to and from RUS), which was published by Network Rail in North Thameside. December 2007 and established by the Office of NET01 59_Route Plan fold outs.qxd:405 x 297 25/3/09 17:59 Page 12 Route 6 North London Line and Thameside Route 8 Route 5 Route 5 Route 5 2 O Harringay Jcn N Harringay Seven South Harringay 08 Green Lanes Sisters Jcn Park Jcn Tottenham Blackhorse
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of the East London Line
    HISTORY OF THE EAST LONDON LINE – FROM BRUNEL’S THAMES TUNNEL TO THE LONDON OVERGROUND by Oliver Green A report of the LURS meeting at All Souls Club House on 11 October 2011 Oliver worked at the London Transport Museum for many years and was one of the team who set up the Covent Garden museum in 1980. He left in 1989 to continue his museum career in Colchester, Poole and Buckinghamshire before returning to LTM in 2001 to work on its recent major refurbishment and redisplay in the role of Head Curator. He retired from this post in 2009 but has been granted an honorary Research Fellowship and continues to assist the museum in various projects. He is currently working with LTM colleagues on a new history of the Underground which will be published by Penguin in October 2012 as part of LU’s 150th anniversary celebrations for the opening of the Met [Bishops Road to Farringdon Street 10 January 1863.] The early 1800s saw various schemes to tunnel under the River Thames, including one begun in 1807 by Richard Trevithick which was abandoned two years later when the workings were flooded. This was started at Rotherhithe, close to the site later chosen by Marc Isambard Brunel for his Thames Tunnel. In 1818, inspired by the boring technique of shipworms he had studied while working at Chatham Dockyard, Brunel patented a revolutionary method of digging through soft ground using a rectangular shield. His giant iron shield was divided into 12 independently moveable protective frames, each large enough for a miner to work in.
    [Show full text]
  • London Connections OFF-PEAK RAIL SERVICES
    Hertford East St Margarets Interchange Station Aylesbury, Banbury Aylesbury Milton Keynes, Luton Bedford, Stevenage, Letchworth, Welwyn Stevenage Harlow, Bishops Stortford, and Birmingham Northampton, Cambridge, Kings Lynn, Hertford Stansted Airport Limited services (in line colours) Wellingborough, Garden City Ware Rugby, Coventry, Kettering, Leicester, Huntingdon, Peterborough North and Cambridge and The North East Rye Limited service station (in colours) Birmingham and Nottingham, Derby Hatfield Bayford The North West House Escalator link and Sheffield Broxbourne Welham Green Cuffley Airport link Chesham Watford Bricket St Albans ST ALBANS HIGH WYCOMBE Amersham North Wood Abbey Brookmans Park Crews Hill Enfield Town Cheshunt Docklands Light Railway Watford WATFORD Cockfosters Theobalds Tramlink Garston How Park Potters Bar Gordon Hill Wagn Epping Beaconsfield JUNCTION Wood Street Radlett Grove Bus link Hadley Wood Oakwood Enfield Chase Railway Chalfont & Latimer Watford Bush Theydon Bois Croxley Hill UNDERGROUND LINES Seer Green Croxley High Street Silverlink County New Barnet Waltham Cross Green Watford Elstree & Borehamwood Southgate Grange Park Park Debden West Turkey Bakerloo Line Chorleywood Enfield Lock Gerrards Cross Oakleigh Park Arnos Grove Winchmore Hill Street Loughton Central Line Bus Link Stanmore Edgware High Barnet Bushey Southbury Brimsdown Buckhurst Hill Circle Line Denham Golf Club Rickmansworth Mill Hill Broadway Bounds Chiltern Moor Park Carpenders Park Totteridge & Whetstone Chingford Canons Park Burnt New Green
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Focus' Response to C2c's Proposed Franchise Extension July
    Passenger Focus’ response to c2c’s proposed franchise extension July 2008 Passenger Focus – who we are and what we do Passenger Focus is the independent national rail consumer watchdog. It is an executive non- departmental public body sponsored by the Department for Transport. Our mission is to get the best deal for Britain's rail passengers. We have two main aims: to influence both long and short term decisions and issues that affect passengers and to help passengers through advice, advocacy and empowerment. With a strong emphasis on evidence-based campaigning and research, we ensure that we know what is happening on the ground. We use our knowledge to influence decisions on behalf of rail passengers and we work with the rail industry, other passenger groups and Government to secure journey improvements. Our vision is to ensure that the rail industry and Government are always ‘putting rail passengers first’ This will be achieved through our mission of ‘getting the best deal for passengers’ 1 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Executive summary 3 3. Response to DfT consultation document 4 4. Appendix A: summary of consultation responses 10 5. Contact details 12 2 1. Introduction Passenger Focus welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Department for Transport’s (DfT) consultation on the proposal to extend c2c’s franchise by two years. Although the consultation process has not been formally set out we were aware of informal discussions for an extension since last year. We view the extension proposal as a very good opportunity for the c2c franchise to be revitalised with a fresh mandate to develop and improve operational performance as well as customer services.
    [Show full text]
  • Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE
    ITEM 1 TRANSPORT COMMITTEE NEWS 07 MARCH 2000 This report may be of interest to: All Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE Accountable Officer: John Inman Author: Stephen Mortimer 1. Purpose 1.1 To advise the Committee of developments relating to Milton Keynes’ rail services. 2. Summary 2.1 West Coast Main Line Modernisation and Upgrade is now in the active planning stage. It will result in faster and more frequent train services between Milton Keynes Central and London, and between Milton Keynes Central and points north. Bletchley and Wolverton will also have improved services to London. 2.2 Funding for East-West Rail is now being sought from the Shadow Strategic Rail Authority (SSRA) for the western end of the line (Oxford-Bedford). Though the SSRA have permitted a bid only for a 60 m.p.h. single-track railway, excluding the Aylesbury branch and upgrade of the Marston Vale (Bedford-Bletchley) line, other Railtrack investment and possible developer contributions (yet to be investigated) may allow these elements to be included, as well as perhaps a 90 m.p.h. double- track railway. As this part of East-West Rail already exists, no form of planning permission is required; however, Transport and Works Act procedures are to be started to build the missing parts of the eastern end of the line. 2.3 New trains were introduced on the Marston Vale line, Autumn 1999. A study of the passenger accessibility of Marston Vale stations identified various desirable improvements, for which a contribution of £10,000 is required from this Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The Environmental Statement
    The Environmental Statement The Environmental Statement and this Non-Technical Summary have been prepared by Environmental Resources Management (ERM), on behalf of DLRL. ERM is an independent environmental consultancy with extensive experience of undertaking Environmental Impact Assessments of transport infrastructure schemes. Copies of the Environmental Statement are available for inspection at the following locations: Docklands Light Railway Ltd Canning Town Library PO Box 154, Castor Lane, Poplar, Barking Road, Canning Town, London E14 0DX London E16 4HQ (Opening Hours: 9.00am-5.00pm Mondays to Fridays) (Opening Hours: Monday 9.30am-5.30pm, Tuesday 9.30am- 5.30pm, Wednesday Closed, Thursday 1.00-8.00pm, Friday London Borough of Newham 9.30am-5.30pm, Saturday 9.30am-5.30pm, Sunday Closed) Environmental Department, 25 Nelson Street, East Ham, London E6 2RP Custom House Library (Opening Hours: 9.00am-5.00pm Mondays to Fridays) Prince Regent Lane, Custom House, London E16 3JJ Bircham Dyson Bell (Opening Hours: Monday 9.30am-5.30pm, Tuesday 9.30am- Solicitors and Parliamentary Agents, 5.30pm, Wednesday Closed, Thursday 1.00-8.00pm, Friday 50 Broadway, Westminster, London SW1H 0BL Closed, Saturday 9.30am-5.30pm, Sunday Closed) (Opening Hours: 9.30am-5.30pm Mondays to Fridays) North Woolwich Library Hackney Central Library Storey School, Woodman Street¸ Technology and Learning Centre, North Woolwich, London E16 2LS 1 Reading Lane, London E8 1GQ (Opening Hours: Monday 9.30am-1.30pm and 2.30pm-5.30pm, (Opening Hours: Monday 9.00am-8.00pm, Tuesday
    [Show full text]
  • Commissioning and Managing the West Midlands Railway West Midlands Rail Proposition and Business Case October 2014
    Commissioning and Managing the West Midlands Railway West Midlands Rail Proposition and Business case October 2014 West Midlands Raiaill The WMR Proposition Contents Preface 1. Why Local? 7 2. Supporting Devolution 9 3. Our Strategies and Policies 10 4. Supporting Economic Growth 12 5. Re-mapping the Network 14 6. Accountable, Capable Governance 19 7. What We Want to Do 22 8. The Financial Structure 25 9. Renewal and enhancement 27 10. Working with Our Stakeholders 29 11. Procurement and Programme 31 12. Managing the Risks of Change 33 13. Five Stage Business Case Summary 35 The Business Case Contents Appendices 1. OVERVIEW Introduction 38 The West Midlands Devolution Proposition 38 The Strategic Case 39 The Economic Case 40 The Financial Case 40 The Commercial Case 41 The Management Case 41 2. THE STRATEGIC CASE Policy Context 42 Problems and Opportunities 48 Devolution Objectives 51 Measures for Success 51 Scope of Devolution 55 Alternative Strategic Options Considered 62 Conclusion 68 3. THE ECONOMIC CASE Introduction 69 Cost Impacts 69 Benefit Opportunities 70 Value for Money 72 Conclusion 79 4. THE FINANCIAL CASE Cost and Revenue Changes 80 Financial Scale of the Proposition 84 Funding Requirements 87 Financial Risk 88 Conclusion 91 5. THE COMMERCIAL CASE Introduction 92 Contractual Framework 92 Procurement 93 Approach to Developing an Output Specification 94 Conclusion 98 6. THE MANAGEMENT CASE Governance 99 Managing the Franchise 103 Conclusion 106 Appendices A Local Transport Plan Objectives 108 B Devolution Case Studies 115 C
    [Show full text]
  • Trains 27.1 15.0 3.7 1.8 North America - Continuing 22.6 20.6 18.3 17.8 Central Functions (4.7) (4.1) - - 67.3 53.2 6.2 4.6
    Interim Results For the six months ended 30 June 2005 28 July 2005 Phil White Chief Executive HALF YEAR HIGHLIGHTS • Strong financial performance • Growth in earnings and dividend • Delivering premier league performance • Innovation driving passenger growth • Disposal of Public Transit to Connex • Record bid season in North America • Shareholder value enhanced Adam Walker Finance Director FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (1) • Strong financial results ¾ Margin improvement ¾ Costs controlled ¾ Cash flow generation ¾ Shareholder value • IFRS restatement presented in June FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (2) • Turnover £1.1bn (2004*: £1.2bn) • Normalised operating profit up 26.5% to £67.3m (2004*: £53.2m) • Normalised profit before tax of £58.1m up 47.5% (2004*: £39.4m) • Normalised diluted EPS of 31.3p up 44.9% (2004*: 21.6p) • Interim dividend of 10.0p up 7% (2004 : 9.35p) • Net debt of £143.3m (2004 : £136.6m) • Operating cash flow of £105.1m (2004 : £150.0m) * Restated under IFRS GROUP INCOME STATEMENT 2005 2004* £m £m Revenue 1,077.7 1,157.9 Normalised operating profit 67.3 53.2 Loss from associates (4.4) (4.3) Interest (4.8) (9.5) Normalised profit before tax 58.1 39.4 Exceptional items (0.3) (5.3) Goodwill & intangible asset amortisation (18.3) (17.2) Profit before tax 39.5 16.9 Taxation (14.7) (7.2) Profit after tax 24.8 9.7 (Loss)/Profit from discontinued operations (57.5) 4.6 (32.7) 14.3 * Restated under IFRS DIVISIONAL OPERATING PROFIT AND MARGIN Operating profit Operating margin 2005 2004* 2005 2004* £m £m % % Coaches 4.1 2.1 4.5 2.4 Buses 18.2 19.6
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal
    Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal: Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Context This submission constitutes the London Borough of Hounslow’s response to an invitation to provide initial comments on the Crossrail project’s proposal for a new corridor for Crossrail 1: Corridor 6 – Norbiton, via Old Oak Common, Acton, Chiswick, Richmond and Kingston. The submission considers the proposal in terms of service and amenity for the borough’s residents and businesses, and within the context of the Council’s published policies. In addition to the two options that constitute the Corridor 6 proposals, this submission provides two further options for Crossrail’s consideration. While the Council must record its disappointment that an effective period of less than two weeks was offered for preparation of this submission, the Council also wishes to record its appreciation for the assistance given by the Crossrail consultation team during the preparation of the submission. 1.2 Council Policies The London Borough of Hounslow Unitary Development Plan’s objectives relating to transport and land use development are summarised below: • To promote sustainable transport modes (walking, cycling, public and waterborne transport) which improves access for all members of the community and enhances public transport provision in London as a whole, while reducing car traffic and the demand for road space. • To encourage a pattern of land use, and provision of transport which minimises harm to the environment and reduces the need to travel, especially by car, whilst maximising development opportunities in the Borough.
    [Show full text]
  • Bellblue Portfolio
    Bellblue Portfolio A portfolio of mainly income-producing HMOs, and mixed-use retail & residential buildings all situated within affluent North & North West London suburbs including Kensal Rise, Kilburn, Willesden, Stroud Green and Camden. Available as a portfolio or individually. Opportunities to increase the rental income and add value by way of letting of the current vacant units, refurbishment & modernisation, implementing existing planning consents & obtaining new planning consents (STP). Portfolio Schedule Property Description Income PA ERV Guide Price Gross Yield 26 Chamberlayne Retail & 7 studio £91,296 £116,000 £1,450,000 6.30% Road, Kensal Rise, flats above (Reversionary NW10 3JD Yield 8.0%) 76 Chamberlayne Retail with 3 £73,224 £80,000 £1,275,000 5.74% Road, Kensal Rise, studio & 1 x2-bed (Reversionary NW10 3JJ flats above Yield 6.27%) 88 Chamberlayne HMO – 8 studio Vacant £123,000 £1,525,000 *subject to Road, Kensal Rise, flats with PP to refurb/build NW10 3JL extend costs 112 Chamberlayne Retail with 4 £112,360 £136,000 £1,825,000 6.16% Road, Kensal Rise, studio & 4 1-bed (Reversionary NW10 3JP flats above Yield 7.45%) 7 Clifford Gardens, HMO – 5 studio & £72,936 £107,000 £1,500,000 4.86% Kensal Rise, NW10 2 1-bed flats above (1 unit vacant) (Reversionary 5JE Yield 7.13%) 17 St Pauls Avenue, HMO – 6 studio & £96,180 £123,000 £1,550,000 6.21% Willesden, NW2 5SS 2 1-bed flats above (Reversionary Yield 7.94%) 3 Callcott Road, HMO – 8 studio £95,868 £123,000 £1,595,000 6.01% Kilburn, NW6 7EB flats above (Reversionary Yield 7.71%)
    [Show full text]
  • SUGGESTED LAYOUT and SERVICES for OLD OAK
    98 Manor Way, Beckenham, Kent BR3 3LR 07843 234002 www.westlondonlinegroup.org.uk March 2014 SUGGESTED LAYOUT and SERVICES FOR OLD OAK COMMON FOR WEST LONDON LINE, NORTH LONDON LINE, GREAT WESTERN MAIN LINE, CROSSRAIL and HS2 plus WEST COAST MAIN LINE and MIDLAND MAIN LINE There is a lack of detailed and complete information in Network Rail’s London & South East Route Utilisation Strategy regarding demand on the West London Line and others in the area that would arise from an interchange with the Great Western Main Line (GWML), Crossrail and High Speed 2 (HS2) at Old Oak Common that would also be integrated with the regeneration proposals in this area. We have therefore set out below our suggested revisions to TfL’s proposed Option A for the layout for the Old Oak Common interchange. Our suggestions should accommodate anticipated increased rail demand arising generally, from growth on the WLL, WLL and other lines’ connections with Crossrail/GWML and HS2, and the need to produce a Premier Interchange that is ‘future-proofed’ until at least 2080. We believe these suggestions are workable and provide better rail capacities and integration, with lesser impacts on residents and ecological areas, and with no sprawl. Our suggested curves are no tighter than elsewhere in Option A; ideally these should be eased to minimise ‘wheel squeal’ and running times. The feasibility of our suggestions in terms of gradients and height clearances for running tracks would need to be checked. The HS2 and Crossrail/GWML platforms are unchanged, although we would urge that the HS2 platforms are elevated to reduce vertical interchange distances between them and other lines (and presumably the spoil to be removed for the HS2 station box): this elevation should also ease our suggested connections between the HS2 tracks and those of Crossrail and the WLL.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transport Economist the Journal of the Transport Economists’ Group
    The Transport Economist The Journal of the Transport Economists’ Group 3 Tube 2.5 Tube after 22:00 Bus Night Bus 2 1.5 1 0.5 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Editor Peter Gordon Volume 44 Number 2 Summer 2017 The Transport Economist Volume 44, Number 2 Summer 2017 Contents Pages Implementing London’s Night Tube Mark Curran 1-10 Econometric evidence on vertical Andrew Smith 11-23 integration and the size and & Phil Wheat structure of rail franchises: what can we learn? Land value capture Julian Ware 24-41 TEG Committee 2017-2018 Details of meetings are provided on our website at http://www.transecongroup.org/meetings.htm Implementing London’s Night Tube Mark Curran, Transport for London Arup 26 April 2017 Overview The speaker began by saying that in late 2007 the then Major Ken Livingstone had wished to run trains 30 minutes later, to 01:00 on Friday and Saturday nights, offset with a later start at 06:30 on Saturdays, but that it was not possible to secure the agreement of the infrastructure providers which were then separate companies. It also ran afoul of the contract with train operators. During the 2012 Olympics, however, the system operated for longer hours, and the network coped well, so it was realised that night running might well be feasible. The Access Transformation Programme, which began around 2012, examined reducing the times allowed for engineering. It was felt that these were allowed because they always had been allowed, and were years out of date.
    [Show full text]
  • Class 313 User Manual
    OPERATIONAL NOTICE Temporary Working for Silverlink Class 313 EMUs on the North and West London Lines Issued on: 12/06/2006 Valid until: UFN Issued by: John Maninsuit Page 1 of 12 The Route The North London Line and West London Line for BVE is an early beta. This route will eventually continue on to North Woolwich with the addition of other features planned in the future. It is modelled as it would have looked during 2004 – 2006 in the height of the Silverlink Metro era just before the closure of the section to North Woolwich. In 2007 it became part of TFL as part of their London Overground network and was extensively modernised beyond recognition shortly thereafter. The Train Our train is a class 313 EMU built by British Rail Engineering Limited (BREL) at the Holgate Road Carriage Works between 1976 and 1977. Originally designed for the Great Northern lines, they were used on various routes during their many years of service. Some were transferred to the North London Line during the 1980s and were inherited by Silverlink Trains after privatisation. In addition, these trains are used on the West London and Watford DC Lines as well as the St Albans Abbey – Watford Junction service. Controls (default keys) In addition to the default keys within BVE there are additional features on this train. Most of these are similar to standard BR stock within BVE. The specific details are as follows: Key Function 2 Pan Down 3 AC Mode Select/Dual Voltage Alarm Cancel 4 Tail lights On/Off 5 Headlamp/Marker lights On/Off 6 Driver/Guard Bell 7 Wind Destination Blind Forward 9 Pan Up/Set Reset End Instrument Lights On/Off Insert Acknowledge AWS & TPWS Page up TPWS Temporary Override/Tripcock Reset Page Down Key Out/Set Cut Out (DC Mode only) Space DRA On/Off This guide assumes you are using the default keys assigned by BVE.
    [Show full text]