FM 15(1) Pop.Vp
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Vol. 15(1): 25–38 MALACOFAUNA OF TWO HYDROLOGICALLY DIFFERENT HABITATS IN THE NEAR-SHORE ZONE OF THE W£OC£AWEK DAM RESERVOIR (VISTULA RIVER, POLAND) JANUSZ ¯BIKOWSKI1,TOMASZ KAKAREKO1,MA£GORZATA POZNAÑSKA2,JAROS£AW KOBAK2 1Nicolaus Copernicus University, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Department of Hydrobiology, Gagarina 9, 87-100 Toruñ, Poland (e-mail: [email protected]) 2Nicolaus Copernicus University, Institute of General and Molecular Biology, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Gagarina 9, 87-100 Toruñ, Poland ABSTRACT: We studied molluscan fauna at two sites in the W³oc³awek Dam Reservoir, differing with respect to the hydrological conditions: a rheolimnic site with a comparatively strong water flow (Soczewka) and a limnetic site, dominated by wave action (Dobiegniewo). Within each site, we sampled molluscs from three sub- stratum types (sand, a thin layer of mud on sand and mud). Samples were collected monthly, from April to Oc- tober. The taxonomic composition differed between the sites, with Sphaerium corneum (L. 1758), Pisidium sp. C. Pfeiffer, 1821, Bithynia tentaculata (L. 1758) and Viviparus viviparus (L. 1758) being more abundant in Soczewka, while Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Gray, 1843), Marstoniopsis scholtzi (Schmidt, 1856) and Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas 1771) occurred exclusively in Dobiegniewo. S. corneum was a strong dominant in most of the samples, and variation in its abundance was the only cause of the observed differences among the various sub- strata. Strong differences in the total density and biomass were also observed between the two sites, the molluscs from Soczewka being much more abundant. This phenomenon was particularly apparent on the muddy substratum, which was the most suitable in Soczewka and the poorest in Dobiegniewo. Our study re- vealed that moderate water flow in Soczewka affected molluscs by improving conditions for them, especially on the muddy substratum. KEY WORDS: lowland dam reservoir, water flow, water level fluctuations, substratum, Mollusca, hydrological conditions INTRODUCTION Dam reservoirs are comparatively young water (STAÑCZYKOWSKA &JURKIEWICZ-KARNKOWSKA 1983) bodies. Most of them were created in the third quar- or 80 cm (PATERSON &FERNANDO 1969, ARMITAGE ter of the 20th century (G£ODEK 1985). Therefore, 1977). In our opinion, the near-shore zone extends their ecosystems have been much less investigated up to areas with decreased environmental hetero- than those of lakes, rivers and other water bodies. Be- geneity and bottom sediments similar to those found cause of the high diversity of habitats and, in conse- in the central part of a reservoir. Obviously, its range quence, biocoenoses, as well as a strong impact upon strongly depends on local conditions. In the the local environment, dam reservoirs are interesting W³oc³awek Dam Reservoir, the near-shore zone ex- and important objects of scientific research. tends up to ca. 100 m from the shore and reaches a The near-shore zone is the most variable habitat depth of 2 m. within a dam reservoir. Usually, its range is deter- In the near-shore zone of a dam reservoir, one can mined using the depth criterion, although various usually distinguish an area that is temporarily ex- authors assume different border values, such as 2 m posed to air and inhabited primarily by euryoecious 26 Janusz ¯bikowski, Tomasz Kakareko, Ma³gorzata Poznañska, Jaros³aw Kobak species. Their survival depends mainly on their move- (i.e. phytoplankton) from the water column, increas- ment abilities (IZVEKOVA et al. 1997). With respect to ing water transparency, changing its chemical proper- mobility, benthic animals can be divided into two ties (HOLLAND et al. 1995, JOHENGEN et al. 1995, groups: 1) species migrating with the decreasing IDRISI et al. 2001) and stimulating development of water level (mostly predatory and/or epifaunal, in- macrophytes and phytobenthos (LOWE &PILLSBURY cluding some snail species), 2) those remaining in the 1995). Furthermore, they produce large amounts of air-exposed area. The latter survive periodic drying faeces and pseudofaeces that improve food condi- and freezing by burying themselves in sediments, tions for other benthic organisms. Thus, they modify building shelters or undergoing physiological the structure and increase abundance of zoobenthos changes. This group includes bivalves, which respond communities (WOLNOMIEJSKI 1970, STEWART et al. to air exposure by closing their valves, and snails 1998). Substances released by bivalves affect also which can use an operculum or epiphragm to close abundance and metabolic activity of microorganisms their shells. Furthermore, pill clams Pisidium living in bottom sediments (GRIFFITHS 1993, NALEPA casertanum (Poli, 1791) and Pisidium personatum et al. 1996, KURBATOVA 1998). Therefore, bivalves, es- Malm, 1855) form protective aggregations ca. 30-40 pecially Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas, 1771), are re- cm below the sediment surface, and a snail Valvata garded as the so-called ecosystem engineers, i.e. or- piscinalis (O.F. Müller, 1774) is able to dehydrate its ganisms which are able to cause considerable changes tissues and thus increase its resistance to freezing in their environment and control the use of resources (STAÑCZYKOWSKA &JURKIEWICZ-KARNKOWSKA 1983). by other species (KARATAYEV et al. 2002). Moreover, Communities developing in this reservoir zone are molluscs are a valuable tool in monitoring and typo- similar to those occurring in periodically dried fish logy of water bodies (KRZY¯ANEK 1991, ROSENBERG & ponds. Two areas can be distinguished within this RESH 1993), and bioindication of toxins, such as zone: bare sand substratum and sand with various ad- heavy metals (OERTEL 1998, JURKIEWICZ-KARNKOW- ditions of fine detritus (SOKOLOVA &SAKHAROVA SKA 1999a, GRUNDACKER 2000). They influence ele- 1991). Benthos abundance at such sites strongly de- ment cycling, e.g. phosphorus (JURKIEWICZ-KARN- pends on the season and duration of air exposure KOWSKA &KRÓLAK 2000) or calcium and are an impor- events, and is highly variable among different water tant item in the diet of fish (MARTYNIAK et al. 1987, bodies (KAJAK 1987). PREJS et al. 1990, TERLECKI et al. 1990), and waterfowl Below the air-exposed zone, zoobenthos biodiver- (STOCZKOWSKI &STAÑCZYKOWSKA 1995). sity and biomass usually reach their maximum values The impact of malacofauna upon an aquatic eco- due to the lower variability of environmental factors, system obviously depends on its taxonomic composi- high habitat heterogeneity (macrophyte presence) tion and abundance, which in turn are influenced by and suitable food and oxygen conditions. Then, with multiple biotic and abiotic factors. In a dam reservoir, further increasing depth, the benthic community be- organisms are affected especially by its hydrological comes less diverse and abundant (BRINKHURST 1974, regime (i.e. water flow, water level fluctuations). The KAJAK 1988). impact of this factor changes with the distance from With regard to biomass, the near-shore benthic the dam, which is particularly apparent in strongly communities of dam reservoirs are usually dominated rheolimnic reservoirs, such as the W³oc³awek Dam by Mollusca (STAÑCZYKOWSKA &JURKIEWICZ-KARN- Reservoir. That is why the relationships between hy- KOWSKA 1983, JURKIEWICZ-KARNKOWSKA 1989, 2004, drological conditions and the quality and quantity of KUKLIÑSKA 1989, DUSOGE 1989, ¯YTKOWICZ et al. the bottom fauna, including Mollusca, should be in- 1990, KRZY¯ANEK 1991, ¯BIKOWSKI 1995, JURKIE- vestigated in detail. Therefore, the aim of the present WICZ-KARNKOWSKA &¯BIKOWSKI 2004). Mollusca study was to compare the taxonomic composition, dominated also on introduced artificial substrata in abundance and biomass of malacofauna from two the W³oc³awek Dam Reservoir (CZARNECKA 2005). hydrologically distinct habitats of the near-shore zone This shows the great importance of this taxon in the of the W³oc³awek Reservoir: a lotic site located in its W³oc³awek Dam Reservoir. Molluscs can greatly affect upper part, and a limnetic site from the lower part of ecosystem functioning. Bivalves remove chlorophyll the reservoir. STUDY AREA AND METHODS STUDY AREA largest Polish reservoir with respect to surface area and the second largest considering volume (with the The W³oc³awek Dam Reservoir (WDR) is located Soliñski Dam Reservoir being the biggest). Thus, it is between 618th and 675th km of the Vistula River one of the greatest midland water bodies in Poland, course (Fig. 1). It is the first and the only component smaller only than lakes Œniardwy and Mamry. of the Cascade of the Lower Vistula. The WDR is the Malacofauna of the W³oc³awek Dam Reservoir 27 Fig. 1. Location of the sampling sites in the W³oc³awek Dam Reservoir The basic morphometric parameters of the WDR the water volume to the reservoir. At a daily time (GRZEŒ 1983) are the following: surface area – 75 scale, it is affected by the activity of the hydropower km2; volume – total: 400 mln m3, usable: 55 mln m3; station, located at the dam. A very important factor, length – 57 km; shoreline length – 130 km; width – influencing the hydrological conditions in the reser- mean: 1,210 m, range: 500–2,500 m; depth – mean: 5 voir, is the small usable volume (14% of the total vol- m, maximum: 15 m; mean water flow – 900 m3.s-1. ume), resulting in low fluctuations of the water level A particular feature of the WDR is its very short (usually below 0.5 m). water retention time (ca. 4–7 days). Thus, it is strongly rheolimnic, with