British Columbia Geological Survey Geological Fieldwork 1989
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Proquest Dissertations
The Distribution of Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tar and us caribou) and Moose (Alces alces) in the Fort St. James Region of Northern British Columbia, 1800-1950 Domenico Santomauro B.A., University of Bologna, Italy, 2003 Thesis Submitted In Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirements For The Degree Of Master in Natural Resources and Environmental Studies The University of Northern British Columbia September 2009 © Domenico Santomauro, 2009 Library and Archives Bibliothgque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'6dition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre r6f£rence ISBN: 978-0-494-60853-1 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-60853-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. -
Paper 08 (Colour).Vp
Toodoggone Geoscience Partnership: Preliminary Bedrock Mapping Results from the Swannell Range: Finlay River – Toodoggone River Area (NTS 94E/2 and 7), North-Central British Columbia1 By L. Diakow, G. Nixon, B. Lane and R. Rhodes KEYWORDS: P3, public-private partnership, Targeted Toodoggone River in the north and east (Fig. 1). The new Geoscience Initiative II (TGI-II), bedrock mapping, result s reporte d below em phasiz e changes in the Early Ju- stratigraphy, Finlay River, Toodoggone River airborne ras sic stra tig ra phy of the Toodoggone from west to east. gamma-ray spectrometric and magnetic survey, Toodoggone River, Finlay River, Toodoggone formation, Black Lake Intrusive Suite, Cu-Au porphyry, epithermal LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC UNITS Au-Ag Over the past two field seasons, nearly 600 km2 of the INTRODUCTION Swannell Ranges, situ ated be tween the major drainages of the Toodoggone and Finlay rivers and their conflu ence , The Toodoggone Geoscience Part ner ship was ini tiated have been mapped in detai l, thereby refin ing Juras sic stra - in 2003 to gener ate detai led geoscience infor m ati on, in- tig raphy that was, for the most part, pre viously assigne d to clud ing air borne geo phys ics and bed rock ge ol ogy maps, an un di vided Hazelton Group map unit (Diakow et al., that would sup port min ing ex plo ra tion in pre vi ously ex- 1985, 1993). As a conse quence of mapping in 2004, a re - plored and more re mote ter rain in the east-cen tral gion of pre viously un divided Ju rassic rocks is now iden ti - Toodoggone River and McConnell Creek map ar eas, which fied as part of the Toodoggone form ati on. -
GEOLOGY of the EARLY JURASSIC TOODOGGONE FORMATION and GOLD-SILVER DEPOSITS in the TOODOGGONE RIVER MAP AREA, NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA by Larry J
Province of British Columbia MINERAL RESOURCES DIVISION Ministry oi Energy, Mines and Geological Survey Branch Petroleum Resources Hon. Anne Edwards, Minister GEOLOGY OF THE EARLY JURASSIC TOODOGGONE FORMATION AND GOLD-SILVER DEPOSITS IN THE TOODOGGONE RIVER MAP AREA, NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA By Larry J. Diakow, Andrejs Panteleyev, and Tom G. Schroeter BULLETIN 86 MINERAL RESOURCES DIVISION Geological Survey Branch Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Diakow, Larry, I. Geology of the early Jurassic Toodoggone Formation and gold-silvei depositsin the Toodoggone River map area, northern British Columbia VICTORIA BRITISH COLUMBIA (Bulletin, ISSN 0226-7497; 86) CANADA Issued by Geological Survey Branch. Includes bibliographical references: p January 1993 ISBNO-7718-9277-2 1. Geology - Stratigraphic - Jurassic. 2. Gold ores Geological researchfor this -Geology - British Columbia - Toodoggone River Region. 3. Silver ores - British Columbia - Toodoggone River publication was completed during Region. 4. Geology - British Columbia - Toodoggone the period 1981 to 1984. River Region. 5. Toodoggone Formation (B.C.) I. Fanteleyev, Andrejs, 1942- 11. Schroeter, T. G. In. British Columbia. Geological Survey Branch. IV. British Columbia. V. Title. VI. Series: Bulletin (British Columbia. Minisrry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources); 86. TN414C32B731992 551.7'66'0971185 C92-092349.6 Lawyers gold-silver deposit looking northwesterly with Amethyst Gold Breccia (AGB) and Cliff Creek (CC) zones indicated. Cheni Gold Mines camp is in the lower centre and the mill site at the left of the photograph. Flat-lying ash-flow tuffs of the Saunders Member (Unit 6) form the dissected plateauand scarps in the foreground. Silica-clay-alunite capping Alberts Hump, similar to nearby precious metal bearing advanced argillic altered rocks of the A1 deposit (AI), are barely visible to the north of Toodoggone River and 5 kilometres beyond Metsantan Mountain. -
Toodoggone/Kemess
Moosehorn Lake 590000 600000 610000 Swannell620000 Ranges 630000 640000 Claw Mountain (! (! Tseehee Creek Harmon Creek Moosehorn Creek (! (! Harmon Peak Metsantan Range Adoogacho Creek Hiamadam Creek Peak Range Pulpit Lake Midas Creek µ 6380000 6380000 (! Junkers Creek Breccia Peak Finlay Ranch Russel Property (! Park (! Midas Lake (! Moyez Creek (! Lower Belle Lake Dedeeya Creek Belle Creek (! Contact Peak Peak Range Katharine Creek (! Abesti Creek (!(! (! Upper Belle Lake (! McClair Creek Tuff Peak (! (! Oxide Creek (! Mulvaney Creek (! BONANZA (! (! (! Oxide Peak Jack Lee Creek Ç(! (! Gordonia Gulch (! The MacGregors (! Alberts Hump (! (! (! Mount Gordonia Moyez Creek (! (! (! THESIS II/III (! (! Ç (! PORPHYRY PEARL Belle Creek ^_(! (! Ç(! BV(! (! (! 6370000 (! (! 6370000 (! (! Antoine Louis Creek (! (! (! (! (! (! (! Mount Hartley Metsantan Creek Alberts Hump Creek METS JD Toodoggone Peak (! (! ^_(! (!^_ Mount Estabrook Bronlund Peak Metsantan Creek Mount Katharine (! ! (! ( Katharine Creek (! Metsantan Lake (! Mulvaney Creek (! (! (! Spatsizi McClair Creek Toodoggone Lake Jack Lee Creek Plateau Moosehorn Creek Wilderness Park DUKE Metsantan Pass Kadah Lake (! Toodoggone River MCCLAIR CREEK PLACER ^_ (! Kadah Creek Ç(! (! (! (! Bend Mountain Mount Graves(! Bronlund Creek Lawyers Creek (! (! Lawyers (! (! GOLDEN STRANGER (! (! Property Saunders Creek (! (! (! 6360000 (! (! 6360000 ^_ (! NEW LAW Edozadelly Mountain ^_(! Jock Creek (! (! (! (! (! AGB (! Ç(! (! (! (! CLIFF CREEK (! (! (! Ç (! (! DUKE'S RIDGE ^_(! GOLDEN NEIGHBOR 1 Ç (! -
Joint Review Panel Report
Kemess North Copper-Gold Mine Project Joint Review Panel Report September 17, 2007 KEMESS NORTH COPPER-GOLD MINE PROJECT JOINT REVIEW PANEL 160 ELGIN ST., 22ND FLOOR, OTTAWA, ONTARIO K1A 0H3 September 17, 2007 The Honourable John Baird, P.C., M.P. The Honourable Barry Penner, M.L.A. Minister of the Environment Minister of Environment Room 458, Confederation Building PO Box 9047 – Stn Prov Govt Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6 Room 112 – Parliament Buildings Victoria, BC, V8W 9E2 Dear Ministers: In accordance with the mandate issued on May 19, 2005, the Joint Review Panel has completed its environmental assessment of the Kemess North Copper-Gold Mine Project. The Joint Review Panel is please to submit its report for your consideration. Overall, the Panel has concluded that the Project in its current form would not be in the public interest. The Panel is of the view that the economic and social benefits provided by the Project, on balance, are outweighed by the risks of significant adverse environmental, social and cultural effects, some of which may not emerge until many years after mining operations cease. The Panel therefore recommends that the Project not be approved by your respective governments. Yours truly, Carol Jones, Chair Malcolm Scoble Mark Duiven Kemess North Copper-Gold Mine Project Joint Review Panel Report September 17, 2007 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2007 All Rights Reserved Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Panel Report: Kemess North Copper-Gold Mine Project Issued by the Kemess North Mine Joint Review Panel ISBN 978-0-662-46715-1 Catalogue No.: En106-69/2007E-PDF Printed and Bound in Canada Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................ -
Landforms of British Columbia 1976
Landforms of British Columbia A Physiographic Outline bY Bulletin 48 Stuart S. Holland 1976 FOREWORD British Columbia has more variety in its climate and scenery than any other Province of Canada. The mildness and wetness of the southern coast is in sharp contrast with the extreme dryness of the desert areas in the interior and the harshness of subarctic conditions in the northernmost parts. Moreover, in every part, climate and vegetation vary with altitude and to a lesser extent with configuration of the land. Although the Province includes almost a thousand-mile length of one of the world’s greatest mountain chains, that which borders the north Pacitic Ocean, it is not all mountainous but contains a variety of lowlands and intermontane areas. Because of the abundance of mountains, and because of its short history of settlement, a good deal of British Columbia is almost uninhabited and almost unknown. However, the concept of accessibility has changed profoundly in the past 20 years, owing largely to the use of aircraft and particularly the helicopter. There is now complete coverage by air photography, and by far the largest part of the Province has been mapped topographically and geologically. In the same period of time the highways have been very greatly improved, and the secondary roads are much more numerous. The averagecitizen is much more aware of his Province, but, although knowledge has greatly improved with access,many misconceptions remain on the part of the general public as to the precise meaning even of such names as Cascade Mountains, Fraser Plateau, and many others. -
Upper Skeena Fish Passage Culvert Inspection
Upper Skeena Fish Passage Culvert Inspection Ken Rabnett & Tim Wilson Gitksan Watershed Authorities February 2008 Upper Skeena Fish Passage Culvert Inspections 2 Gitksan Watershed Authorities February 2008 Upper Skeena Fish Passage Culvert Inspections Summary The purpose of this report is to present background information and survey results for fish passage inspections along the B.C. Rail grade located in the upper Skeena Watershed. In 2007, Gitksan Watershed Authorities (GWA) was retained by the Pacific Salmon Commission to conduct a Fish Passage and Culvert Inspection (FPCI) on all non-bridged B.C. Rail crossings of fish bearing streams in the upper Skeena Watershed. The upper Skeena Watershed fish passage assessment is the final component of a regional effort to improve fish passage limited by highways, secondary roads, and railway grades throughout high and very high value fish habitat in the Skeena Basin. This fish passage inspection project focused on the BC Rail grade, which enters the Skeena Watershed a few kilometres south of Bear Lake, traverses Bear Lake and River, passes Sustut River on the north bank, and goes upstream on the Skeena River northbank passing into the Stikine drainage. The B.C. Rail grade is 195 km in length within the Skeena Watershed. The primary objective of this project was to focus on increasing the abundance of fish stocks by opening freshwater habitat to salmon spawning and rearing. This project utilized the fish passage culvert inspection procedure developed to evaluate one of the most easily addressed fish habitat constraints: access to existing habitat. The methodology is based on the BC Government fish passage protocol outlined in Fish Passage – Culvert Inspection Procedures. -
Manson Creek Area, British Columbia (94N/9,10,15; 94C/2)
Province of British Columbia MINERAL RESOURCES DIVISION Ministry of Energy, Mines Geological Survey Branch and Petroleum Resources Hon. Anne Edwards, Minister BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF THE GERMANSEN LANDING - MANSON CREEK AREA, BRITISH COLUMBIA (94N/9,10,15; 94C/2) By Filippo Ferri, P.Geo. and David M. Melville, P.Geo. with contributions by M.J. Orchard (GSC) BULLETIN 91 Ferri.Filippo. 1959- . Bedrock geology of !he Germansen Landing-MansonCnek area, British Columbia (94N19. IO. 15: 94CR) (Bulletin. ISSN 02267497 ; 91) Issued by Geological Survey Branch. Ineludes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-77262125-X VICTORIA BRITISH COLUMBIA 1. Geology -British Columbia - Germansen Landing Region. CANADA 2. Geology - British Columbia - Manson Creek Region. 3. Gcology. - British Columbia - Germanscn Landing Economic APRIL 1994 Region. 4. Geology. Economic - British Columbia - Manson Creek Region. I. Melville. David M. 11. BritishColumbia. Ministry of Energy, Mines and Perroleurn Resources. Ill. British Columbia. GeologicalSurvey Branch. IV. TiUc. V. Series:Bulletin (British Columbia. Ministry of Energy. Miner and Peuolcum Resources) ; Fieldwork for this research was 91. carried out during the period I987 to 1989 TN27.B7F47 1994 551.7’00971182C94-960168.3 - ABSTRACT TheGermansen Landing-Manson Creek area is sillimanite grade within the Wolverine Metamorphic Com- located within the southern Omineca Mountains of north- plex. Rocks of the Nina Creek group were imbricated and central British Columbia. This region streddles the Inter- emplaced on top of North American rocks during this time montane-Omineca Belt boundary and encompasses rocks period.Middle to Late(?)Jurassic D2 deformation fromfive tectonostratigraphicterranes and subterrenes. refoldedthese rocks into uprightto northeast and These are: North American siliciclastics and carbonates of southwest(?)-verging structures. -
Stratigraphy, Terminology and Correlation of Upper Proterozoic Rocks in Omineca and Cassiar Mountains, North-Central British Columbia
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA COMMISSION GEOLOGIQUE DU CANADA PAPER 77-19 STRATIGRAPHY, TERMINOLOGY AND CORRELATION OF UPPER PROTEROZOIC ROCKS IN OMINECA AND CASSIAR MOUNTAINS, NORTH-CENTRAL BRITISH COLUMBIA J.L. MANSY H. GABRI ELSE Energy, Mines and Energie, Mines et 1+ Resources Canada Ressources Canada 1978 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PAPER 77-19 STRATIGRAPHY, TERMINOLOGY AND CORRELATION OF UPPER PROTEROZOIC ROCKS IN OMINECA AND CASSIAR MOUNTAINS, NORTH-CENTRAL BRITISH COLUMBIA J.L. MANSY H. GABRIELSE 1978 ©Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1978 available by mail from Printing and Publishing Supply and Services Canada, Hull, Quebec, Canada Kl A OS9, and The Geological Survey of Canada 601 Booth St., Ottawa, KIA OE8 or Through you r bookseller. Catalogue No. M44-77I19 Price: Canada: $3.00 ISBN - 0-660-01518-8 Other Countries: $3.60 Price subject to change without notice CONTENTS Page Abstract/Resume . l Introduction . l Previous terminology . ................................................................ 2 Proposed terminology . 2 Stratigraphy . 2 Swannell Formation . 2 Tsaydiz Formation . 5 Espee Formation . 5 Stelkuz Formation . 9 Conclusions . 16 Acknowledgments.................................................................... 16 References . 17 Illustrations Figure 1. General distribution of the Upper Proterozoic Windermere Supergroup in the Canadian Cordillera .............................................. 2. Current and proposed stratigraphic terminology and correlation of the Windermere Supergroup ............................................. -
Muskwa-Kechika Management Area Biodiversity Conservation & Climate
MK Muskwa-Kechika Management Area Biodiversity Conservation & Climate Change Assessment Prepared by the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative for the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area Advisory Board April, 2012 1 MK FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Table of Contents Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................8 1240 Railway Avenue, Unit 200 Canmore, AB T1W 1P4 Canada I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................18 Telephone: (403)609-2666 1. Purpose and Scope of the Conservation Assessment ................................................................................... 18 Fax: (403)609-2667 2. Project Objectives ............................................................................................................................................... 19 Available for download from: http://www.y2y.net 3. Muskwa-Kechika Management Area: Summary of Conservation and Heritage Values ........................ 19 4. Management Context for the Conservation Assessment ............................................................................ 20 SUGGESTED CITATION: 5. Facing the Challenge .......................................................................................................................................... 21 Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative. 2012. Muskwa-Kechika -
Takla Lake First Nation Climate Change Vulnerability & Risk Assessment
JUNE 2016 Takla Lake First Nation Climate Change Vulnerability & Risk Assessment Prepared by: Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the Takla Lake First Nation and CPAWS-BC. First, we would like to thank the people of Takla Lake First Nation who participated in this project. Thank you also to community member Margo French for conducting the community survey interviews for this project. A special thanks to the Takla Lake First Nation Chief and Council for their support and the Takla Lake community for their assistance and support throughout this project. We would also like to acknowledge Michelle Sinclair (Lochhead), project lead for Takla Lake First Nation, Gregory Kehm (Principal, Gregory Kehm & Associates) and Elyse Curley (CPAWS-BC) for their dedication to this project. Further acknowl- edgements go to Dr. Jim Pojar (co-creator of Projected Degree of Ecological Up- heaval data), Trevor Murdock (Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium, University of Victoria) for assistance with climate models, and to Peter Wood (CPAWS-BC) for guiding us to the finish line. The funding for this project was provided by AANDC through the Climate Change Adaptation Program. CPAWS-BC’s participation was supported by the Real Estate Foundation of B.C. and the Wilburforce Foundation. 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Project Background 1.1 Project Significance 1.2 Project Summary and Purpose 1.3 Best Practices Research 1.4 Our Approach 2.0 Summary of Community Information 2.1 Existing Socio-Economic, Health, and Community Infrastructure Information -
An Introduction to the Ecoregions of British Columbia
An Introduction to the Ecoregions of British Columbia Dennis A. Demarchi Third Edition March, 2011 Ecosystem Information Section Ministry of Environment Victoria, British Columbia An Introduction to the Ecoregions of British Columbia 2 Table of Contents Overview ............................................................................................................................... 4 Ecoregions Classification Order .......................................................................................................5 PART I: Ecoregion Classification Background ........................................................................ 15 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 15 British Columbia's Environment – The Setting ............................................................................... 16 The British Columbia Ecoregion Classification ................................................................................ 18 Uses of the British Columbia Ecosystem Classification ....................................................................... 20 PART II: Ecoregion Unit Descriptions .................................................................................... 22 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 22 Cool Oceanic Ecodomain ....................................................................................................................