DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories Edited by Nigel Dudley Including IUCN WCPA Best Practice Guidance on Recognising Protected Areas and Assigning Management Categories and Governance Types by Sue Stolton, Peter Shadie and Nigel Dudley Developing capacity for a protected planet Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 21 IUCN WCPA’s BEST PRACTICE PROTECTED AREA GUIDELINES SERIES IUCN-WCPA’s Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines are the world’s authoritative resource for protected area managers. Involving collaboration among specialist practitioners dedicated to supporting better implementation in the field, they distil learning and advice drawn from across IUCN. Applied in the field, they are building institutional and individual capacity to manage protected area systems effectively, equitably and sustainably, and to cope with the myriad of challenges faced in practice. They also assist national governments, protected area agencies, non- governmental organisations, communities and private sector partners to meet their commitments and goals, and especially the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Programme of Work on Protected Areas. A full set of guidelines is available at: www.iucn.org/pa_guidelines Complementary resources are available at: www.cbd.int/protected/tools/ Contribute to developing capacity for a Protected Planet at: www.protectedplanet.net/ IUCN PROTECTED AREA DEFINITION, MANAGEMENT CATEGORIES AND GOVERNANCE TYPES IUCN defines a protected area as: A clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values. The definition is expanded by six management categories (one with a sub-division), summarized below. Ia Strict nature reserve: Strictly protected for biodiversity and also possibly geological/ geomorphological features, where human visitation, use and impacts are controlled and limited to ensure protection of the conservation values Ib Wilderness area: Usually large unmodified or slightly modified areas, retaining their natural character and influence, without permanent or significant human habitation, protected and managed to preserve their natural condition II National park: Large natural or near-natural areas protecting large-scale ecological processes with characteristic species and ecosystems, which also have environmentally and culturally compatible spiritual, scientific, educational, recreational and visitor opportunities III Natural monument or feature: Areas set aside to protect a specific natural monument, which can be a landform, sea mount, marine cavern, geological feature such as a cave, or a living feature such as an ancient grove IV Habitat/species management area: Areas to protect particular species or habitats, where management reflects this priority. Many will need regular, active interventions to meet the needs of particular species or habitats, but this is not a requirement of the category V Protected landscape or seascape: Where the interaction of people and nature over time has produced a distinct character with significant ecological, biological, cultural and scenic value: and where safeguarding the integrity of this interaction is vital to protecting and sustaining the area and its associated nature conservation and other values VI Protected areas with sustainable use of natural resources: Areas which conserve ecosystems, together with associated cultural values and traditional natural resource management systems. Generally large, mainly in a natural condition, with a proportion under sustainable natural resource management and where low-level non-industrial natural resource use compatible with nature conservation is seen as one of the main aims The category should be based around the primary management objective(s), which should apply to at least three-quarters of the protected area – the 75 per cent rule. The management categories are applied with a typology of governance types – a description of who holds authority and responsibility for the protected area. IUCN defines four governance types. Governance by government: Federal or national ministry/agency in charge; sub-national ministry/agency in charge; government-delegated management (e.g. to NGO) Shared governance: Collaborative management (various degrees of influence); joint management (pluralist management board; transboundary management (various levels across international borders) Private governance: By individual owner; by non-profit organisations (NGOs, universities, cooperatives); by for-profit organsations (individuals or corporate) Governance by indigenous peoples and local communities: Indigenous peoples’ conserved areas and territories; community conserved areas – declared and run by local communities For more information on the IUCN definition, categories and governance type see the 2008 Guidelines for applying protected area management categories which can be downloaded at: www.iucn.org/pa_categories Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories Edited by Nigel Dudley IUCN (International Union for Convention on Biological Diversity Conservation of Nature) The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), which entered IUCN helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most into force in December 1993, is an international treaty for pressing environment and development challenges. the conservation of biodiversity, the sustainable use of the IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, components of biodiversity and the equitable sharing of the ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and benefits derived from the use of genetic resources. With deploying nature-based solutions to global challenges in 193 Parties, the Convention has near universal participation climate, food and development. IUCN supports scientific among countries. The Convention seeks to address all threats research, manages field projects all over the world, and to biodiversity and ecosystem services through scientific brings governments, NGOs, the UN and companies assessments, the development of tools, incentives and together to develop policy, laws and best practice. processes, the transfer of technologies and good practices, IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental and the full and active involvement of relevant stakeholders organization, with more than 1,200 government and including indigenous and local communities, youth, NGOs, NGO Members and almost 11,000 volunteer experts in women and the business community. The tenth meeting of the some 160 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by over Conference of the Parties to the CBD, held in 2010, adopted 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in a revised and updated Strategic Plan for Biodiversity for 2011- public, NGO and private sectors around the world. 2020, comprising five strategic goals and 20 Aichi Biodiversity www.iucn.org Targets. The Plan is the overarching framework on biodiversity, not only for the biodiversity-related conventions, but for the entire United Nations system. www.cbd.int IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) IUCN WCPA is the world’s premier network of protected area expertise. It is administered by IUCN’s Programme on Protected Areas and has over 1,400 members, spanning 140 countries. IUCN WCPA works by helping governments and others plan protected areas and integrate them into all Protected Planet sectors; by providing strategic advice to policy makers; by Protected Planet is a partnership between IUCN, IUCN-WCPA strengthening capacity and investment in protected areas; and UNEP-WCMC that envisages a world that recognizes the and by convening the diverse constituency of protected area value of protected areas and is empowered to take positive stakeholders to address challenging issues. For more than 50 action to maintain and improve their integrity in the face of years, IUCN and WCPA have been at the forefront of global global change. The partnership includes the development of action on protected areas. a global platform for the acquisition, analysis, exchange and www.iucn.org/wcpa communication of data and knowledge on the status and trends of protected areas that engages the full spectrum of stakeholders, and is instrumental in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, the CBD Strategic Plan for Biodiversity, informed decision-making and enhanced action. The Protected Planet report, IUCN WCPA’s Best Practice Guidelines and PARKS journal are all part of empowering this action. www.protectedplanet.net Regional Council for the Environment of Equilibrium Research Junta de Andalucía Equilibrium Research promotes positive environmental and The Regional Council for the Environment of Junta de social change by linking targeted research to field application. Andalucía is the agency of the regional government of Sue Stolton and Nigel Dudley established Equilibrium in 1991. Andalucía responsible for the conservation of nature, the Equilibrium work with groups ranging from local communities application of environmental regulations and policies on the to United Nations agencies. Major issues include protected use and management of natural resources, the declaration areas and broadscale approaches to conservation. Equilibrium and management of protected areas, as well as the definition, offers a consultancy service and also runs its own portfolio development and implementation of climate change mitigation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yosemite National Park Visitor Study: Winter 2008
    Social Science Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Visitor Services Project Yosemite National Park Visitor Study Winter 2008 Park Studies Unit Visitor Services Project Report 198 Social Science Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Visitor Services Project Yosemite National Park Visitor Study Winter 2008 Park Studies Unit Visitor Services Project Report 198 October 2008 Yen Le Eleonora Papadogiannaki Nancy Holmes Steven J. Hollenhorst Dr. Yen Le is VSP Assistant Director, Eleonora Papadogiannaki and Nancy Holmes are Research Assistants with the Visitor Services Project and Dr. Steven Hollenhorst is the Director of the Park Studies Unit, Department of Conservation Social Sciences, University of Idaho. We thank Jennifer Morse, Paul Reyes, Pixie Siebe, and the staff of Yosemite National Park for assisting with the survey, and David Vollmer for his technical assistance. Yosemite National Park – VSP Visitor Study February 2–10, 2008 Visitor Services Project Yosemite National Park Report Summary • This report describes the results of a visitor study at Yosemite National Park during February 2-10, 2008. A total of 938 questionnaires were distributed to visitor groups. Of those, 563 questionnaires were returned, resulting in a 60% response rate. • This report profiles a systematic random sample of Yosemite National Park. Most results are presented in graphs and frequency tables. Summaries of visitor comments are included in the report and complete comments are included in the Visitor Comments Appendix. • Fifty percent of visitor groups were in groups of two and 25% were in groups of three or four. Sixty percent of visitor groups were in family groups.
    [Show full text]
  • We've Broken Ground on the New Babcock Nature Center at Buffalo Creek Nature Park!
    614 DORSEYVILLE ROAD PITTSBURGH, PA 15238 BULLETIN WINTER 2 0 2 1 NATURE STORE It’s Bird Feeding Season! Visit Audubon Nature Store to shop our expanded line of feeders and accessories—and seeds—for the birds. We offer curbside pick up— or you may also purchase Beechwood Blend bird seed at your local Giant Eagle! WE CAN HELP YOU TO: • Customize a feeding station, and keep away deer and squirrels. • Choose the right seed—including our Beechwood Blend, formulated for the birds in our area! Call (412) 963-6100 with questions! BEECHWOOD FARMS NATURE RESERVE Store Hours: Tuesday–Saturday, 9am–5pm 614 Dorseyville Road in Fox Chapel We’ve broken ground on the new SUCCOP NATURE PARK In this issue: Store Hours: Tuesday–Saturday, 12–5pm Babcock Nature Center at Buffalo Creek Nature Park! 185 W. Airport Road in Butler STAFF OurJim Bonner, Executive Director Brian Shema, Operations Director BULLETIN Construction has begun on the Babcock Nature Center. After years of planning and Rachel Handel, Communications Director WINTER 2021 fundraising, numerous design and permitting challenges, higher than expected initial Sarah Koenig, Conservation Director construction bids, and yes—even a pandemic—construction on our new center in Sarver Chris Kubiak, Education Director has finally begun! Table of Contents Audubon Society of Western Pennsylvania is creating a new Environmental Education and BEECHWOOD STAFF Nature Center to serve as the public hub for our Todd Nature Reserve and our conservation Scott Detwiler, Environmental Educator THIS AUDUBON VIEW 3 work throughout the Buffalo Creek Watershed. This center will continue our commitment to Samantha Ditch, Retail Manager this ecologically diverse region that began in 1942, when ASWP was donated the first parcel Gabrielle Hughes, Environmental Educator DIRECTIONS TO OUR RESERVES 3 of property that became the core of Todd Nature Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication in Medvenica Nature Park (Croatia)
    Charter communication in Nature Park Medvednica Sunčana Završki Dominković, Snježana Malić-Limari Public Institution Nature Park Medvednica Medvednica Nature Park Medvednica Nature Park ID-current state Surface of the Park 17.938 ha Height above mean 120 – 1035 m a. s. l. sea level: Highest point: Sljeme Direction: Southwest-northeast in the length of 42 km Territorial City of Zagreb, Krapina-Zagorje boundaries: County, Zagreb County Number of inhabitants in the Approximately 7.400 Nature Park, 2001, estimate: Accessibility: By foot, car, bicycle, public transportation - bus Specific landscape macro-units: a) forests: 81% of Park´s area b) access area: 19% of Park´s area Medvednica Nature Park -Public Institution „Nature Park Medvednica” - management of the Park -Institution works for 16 years now -16 employees -The Park is of a great importance for the city of Zagreb (800.000 inhabitants) from an ecological, educational, recreational and tourist point of view -exposed to many pressures, but despite this it represents very valuable area worth to protect Tourism in the Park - about 1 mil. visitors - no Park entrance fee, - only tickets for 3 attractions and for educational programs - 99% domestic visitors Tourism in the Park Public institution needs to secure infrastructure and services for visitors in accordance with the conservation of natural and cultural values of protected areas “Visiting system” in protected area - System of visitors´ centers, control stations, network of trails, tourist attractions and other which together represent
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks and Iccas in the High Himalayan Region of Nepal: Challenges and Opportunities
    [Downloaded free from http://www.conservationandsociety.org on Tuesday, June 11, 2013, IP: 129.79.203.216] || Click here to download free Android application for this journal Conservation and Society 11(1): 29-45, 2013 Special Section: Article National Parks and ICCAs in the High Himalayan Region of Nepal: Challenges and Opportunities Stan Stevens Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In Nepal, as in many states worldwide, national parks and other protected areas have often been established in the customary territories of indigenous peoples by superimposing state-declared and governed protected areas on pre-existing systems of land use and management which are now internationally considered to be Indigenous Peoples’ and Community Conserved Territories and Areas (ICCAs, also referred to Community Conserved Areas, CCAs). State intervention often ignores or suppresses ICCAs, inadvertently or deliberately undermining and destroying them along with other aspects of indigenous peoples’ cultures, livelihoods, self-governance, and self-determination. Nepal’s high Himalayan national parks, however, provide examples of how some indigenous peoples such as the Sharwa (Sherpa) of Sagarmatha (Mount Everest/Chomolungma) National Park (SNP) have continued to maintain customary ICCAs and even to develop new ones despite lack of state recognition, respect, and coordination. The survival of these ICCAs offers Nepal an opportunity to reform existing laws, policies, and practices, both to honour UN-recognised human and indigenous rights that support ICCAs and to meet International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) standards and guidelines for ICCA recognition and for the governance and management of protected areas established in indigenous peoples’ territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada Dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks - 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (Archived)
    IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks - 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (archived) IUCN Conservation Outlook Assessment 2017 (archived) Finalised on 12 November 2017 Please note: this is an archived Conservation Outlook Assessment for Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks. To access the most up-to-date Conservation Outlook Assessment for this site, please visit https://www.worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org. Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks SITE INFORMATION Country: Brazil Inscribed in: 2001 Criteria: (ix) (x) Site description: The two sites included in the designation contain flora and fauna and key habitats that characterize the Cerrado – one of the world’s oldest and most diverse tropical ecosystems. For millennia, these sites have served as refuge for several species during periods of climate change and will be vital for maintaining the biodiversity of the Cerrado region during future climate fluctuations. © UNESCO IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks - 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (archived) SUMMARY 2017 Conservation Outlook Good with some concerns The current state of conservation of the site is relatively good. Existing threats to ecological processes, biodiversity, threatened species, and other species of particular conservation concern are minor, and management programs are relatively effective. However, conservation of the site was seriously impacted when 72% of the CdVNP was excised from the Park until June 2017. Efforts have been undertaken to restore protection regime for most parts of the site, adding otherwise new areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Versus Development at the Iguacu National Park, Brazil1
    CONSERVATION VERSUS DEVELOPMENT AT THE IGUACU NATIONAL PARK, BRAZIL1 Ramon Arigoni Ortiz a a Research Professor at BC3 – Basque Centre for Climate Change – Bilbao – Spain Alameda Urquijo, 4 Piso 4 – 48009 – [email protected] Abstract The Iguacu National Park is a conservation unit that protects the largest remnant area of the Atlantic Rainforest in Brazil. The Colono Road is 17.6 km long road crossing the Iguacu National Park that has been the motive of dispute between environmentalists, government bodies and NGOs defending the closure of the Colono Road; and organised civil institutions representing the population of the surrounding cities defending its opening. In October 2003, 300 people invaded the Park in an attempt to remove the vegetation and reopen the road, which was prevented by members of the Brazilian Army and Federal Police. Those who advocate the reopening of the Colono Road claim significant economic losses imposed on the surrounding cities. This paper investigates this claim and concludes that a possible reopening of the Colono Road cannot be justified from an economic perspective. Keywords: Iguacu Park; Brazil; Colono Road; economic development; environmental degradation; valuation; cost-benefit analysis 1 WWF-Brazil provided the financial support to this work, which I am grateful. However, WWF-Brazil is not responsible for the results and opinions in this study. I am also grateful to two anonymous referees for their constructive comments, corrections and suggestions. The remaining errors and omissions are responsibility of the author solely. Ambientalia vol. 1 (2009-2010) 141-160 1 Arigoni, R. 1. INTRODUCTION sentence. The Colono Road remained closed until The Iguacu National Park is a conservation May 1997 when an entity named ´Friends of the unit located in Parana State, south region of Brazil Park´ (Movimento de Amigos do Parque) (Figure 1), comprising an area of 185,000 ha.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance of Protected Areas from Understanding to Action
    Governance of Protected Areas From understanding to action Grazia Borrini-Feyerabend, Nigel Dudley, Tilman Jaeger, Barbara Lassen, Neema Pathak Broome, Adrian Phillips and Trevor Sandwith Developing capacity for a protected planet Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No.20 IUCN WCPA’s BEST PRACTICE PROTECTED AREA GUIDELINES SERIES IUCN-WCPA’s Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines are the world’s authoritative resource for protected area managers. Involving collaboration among specialist practitioners dedicated to supporting better implementation in the field, they distil learning and advice drawn from across IUCN. Applied in the field, they are building institutional and individual capacity to manage protected area systems effectively, equitably and sustainably, and to cope with the myriad of challenges faced in practice. They also assist national governments, protected area agencies, non- governmental organisations, communities and private sector partners to meet their commitments and goals, and especially the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Programme of Work on Protected Areas. A full set of guidelines is available at: www.iucn.org/pa_guidelines Complementary resources are available at: www.cbd.int/protected/tools/ Contribute to developing capacity for a Protected Planet at: www.protectedplanet.net/ IUCN PROTECTED AREA DEFINITION, MANAGEMENT CATEGORIES AND GOVERNANCE TYPES IUCN defines a protected area as: A clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means,
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation-Development Duality: the Biosphere Reserve Sierra De Grazalema After 40 Years in the Mab Programme
    European Journal of Geography Volume 8, Number 2:35 - 54, February 2017 ©Association of European Geographers CONSERVATION-DEVELOPMENT DUALITY: THE BIOSPHERE RESERVE SIERRA DE GRAZALEMA AFTER 40 YEARS IN THE MAB PROGRAMME Yolanda Jiménez University of Granada, Instituto de Desarrollo Regional, C/ Rector López Argüeta, Granada, Spain http://idr.ugr.es/ [email protected] Andrés Caballero Universidad del Norte, Department of Social Sciences, Barranquilla, Colombia http://www.uninorte.edu.co/ [email protected] Laura Porcel University of Granada, Instituto de Desarrollo Regional, C/ Rector López Argüeta, Granada, Spain http://idr.ugr.es/ [email protected] Abstract Since 1971 the programme Man and the Biosphere (MaB) of UNESCO has been dedicated to promoting Protected Areas in which conservation of nature is closely linked to territorial development that is beneficial to local communities. In Spain the first area declared as a Biosphere Reserve was Sierra de Grazalema (1977). The history of the management of this Protected Area is now significant enough to analyze how the applied initiatives aimed at conservation have harmonized with those most directly committed to social and economic development. This paper provides an extensive review of the conservation and development programmes and associated measures implemented in the last ten years in Sierra de Grazalema. Keywords: Biosphere reserve, conservation, development, protected areas, Grazalema. 1. INTRODUCTION During the last several decades, the role of Protected Areas (PA) has been significantly redefined in relation to the debate on sustainability. These changes have been accompanied by major updates in European and worldwide policies on PA (Antón et al. 2008). Mose and Weixlbaumer (2006) and Gamper (2007) published papers on a genuine paradigm shift from static protection to dynamic and integrated approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Nationally Determined Contributions Through Protected Areas Table of Contents
    ENHANCING NATIONALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTIONS THROUGH PROTECTED AREAS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 BACKGROUND 5 METHODOLOGY 7 RESULTS 13 1. EXPLICIT MENTION OF PROTECTED AREAS 13 2. ESTABLISHING NEW OR EXPANDING EXISTING PROTECTED AREAS 14 3. UTILIZING PROTECTED AREAS TO HELP PEOPLE ADAPT TO CLIMATE CHANGE (ECOSYSTEM-BASED ADAPTATION) 15 4. MITIGATION BENEFITS FROM CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND AUTHORS AVOIDED EMISSIONS 17 Abigail Hehmeyer, Jacqueline Vogel, Shaun Martin, Ryan Bartlett 5. MANAGING PROTECTED AREAS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE RISKS 18 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 20 WWF CONCLUSION 27 GLOSSARY 28 For more than 50 years, WWF has been protecting the future of nature. One APPENDICES 31 of the world’s leading conservation organizations, WWF works in nearly 100 countries and is supported by more than 1.1 million members in the United APPENDIX 1: RESULTS BY COUNTRY 31 States and 5 million supporters globally. WWF’s unique way of working APPENDIX 2: COUNTRIES RANKED BY CREDITS EARNED FOR THE combines global reach with a foundation in science, involves action at every level 5 CRITERIA EXAMINED 39 from local to global, and ensures the delivery of innovative solutions that meet the needs of both people and nature. Visit worldwildlife.org to learn more. APPENDIX 3: COUNTRIES REFERENCED IN THIS REPORT, LISTED BY REGION 41 REFERENCES 43 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this analysis, conducted by WWF US, was made possible by the Support Project for the Implementation of the Paris Agreement (SPA), which is implemented by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) and funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) under its International Climate Initiative (IKI).
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Inclusive Conservation and Why Is It Important to Biodiversity Conservation and Protected Area Management?
    Fact Sheet What is inclusive conservation and why is it important to biodiversity conservation and protected area management? October 2019 ‘Inclusive Conservation’ is a trans-disciplinary approach to balancing stakeholder visions, and promoting shared agreements for the future management of protected areas through the development and application of multiple tools and processes. - 2 - Protecting our natural areas Global context Protected areas are clearly defined geographical spaces, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated Figure 1: Growth in ecosystem services and cultural values.1 Protected areas are critical for protected area coverage conserving local to regional biodiversity, particularly the characteristic on land and in the ocean (Exclusive Economic Zones of threatened species, habitats and ecosystems.2,3 (EEZ) and Areas Beyond At a global level, Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) National Jurisdiction (ABNJ)) between 1990 agreed in 2010 to a target of protecting at least 17% of terrestrial and and 2018 and projected inland water areas, and 10% of coastal and marine areas (Aichi Target growth to 2020 according 11), by 2020. Currently, protected areas cover almost 15% of land and to commitments from countries and territories.5 inland waters and 8% of the world’s oceans.4 (Figure 1). Area (Million km2) 40 2 30 3 20 10 1 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 1 ABNJ 2 EEZ 3 Land - 3 - Despite this expansion, protected areas only partly cover important sites for biodiversity, and there are issues associated with their ecological representativeness and equitable management6.
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Technical Evaluation Jaú
    WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION - IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION JAÚ NATIONAL PARK (EXTENSION TO FORM THE CENTRAL AMAZON PROTECTED AREAS) (BRAZIL) ID Nº 998 Bis 1. DOCUMENTATION (i) IUCN/WCMC Data Sheet: (10 references) (ii) Additional literature consulted: IUCN, 2000. IUCN Technical Evaluation, Jaú National Park (Brazil). SCM/CNPQ/MCT/IPAAM. 1996. Mamirauá: Plano de Manejo. Manaus: IPAAM. Queiroz, H., and M. E. B. Fernandes. 2001. A Regional Analysis of Geographic Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC; Davis, S. D. et. al. Centres of Plant Diversity. Vol. 3. IUCN; Thorsell, J. and T. Sigaty, 1997. A global overview of forest protected areas on the World Heritage List (Draft). IUCN; Gillet, H. et. al., 1998. A global overview of protected areas on the World Heritage List of particular importance for biodiversity. UNESCO/WCMC/IUCN; Rylands, A. B., 1991. The status of conservation areas in the Brazilian Amazon. WWF, Washington DC; Rojas, M. and C. Castaño, 1990. Areas protegidas de la cuenca del Amazonas. Bogotá, Colombia ; Castaño. C., 1993. Situación general de la conservación de la biodiversidad en la región Amazónica: Evaluación de las áreas protegidas propuestas y estrategias. FAO/CEE/IUCN, Ecuador; Henrique Borges. S and Carvalhes, A., 2000. Bird species of black water inundation forest in the Jaú National Park: their contribution to regional species richness. In Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp 201-214. (iii) Consultations: 5 external reviewers, representatives from the Ministry of Environment, Brazilian Institute of the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA), environmental authorities, from the States of Brasilia and Manaus, local staff of the protected areas from IBAMA and the Mamirauá Institute, and researchers from the University of Florida and the Amazon Research Institute (INPE).
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Highlights Marine Protected Areas Economics, Management and Effective Policy Mixes
    Marine Protected Areas Economics, Management and Effective Policy Mixes Policy HIGHLIGHTS Marine Protected Areas Economics, Management and Effective Policy Mixes Progress in expanding the coverage of marine protected areas is underway. With a push from the Sustainable Development Goals their global coverage is expected to increase even further. But their effectiveness is uneven. It is one thing to draw a line on a map – it is another to effectively design, site, monitor and enforce them. We are starting to understand what works and what doesn’t. Adaptive management and improvements over time will be essential if marine conservation and sustainable use objectives are to be met. Simon Upton – OECD Environment Director POLICY HI G HLI G H T Pressures on marine ecosystems from human activities are already severe and the often S competing demands for marine space and resources are projected to rise. Costs of poor ocean management practices include environmental and social costs that are often not factored into decision-making processes. This undermines the resilience of the ecosystems upon which we depend, for food, for income, but also other less visible life-support functions such as coastal protection, habitat provisioning and carbon sequestration. Marine protected areas are one of the policy instruments available to help ensure the conservation and sustainable use of our vast yet vulnerable ecosystems. While progress is being made towards increasing the global coverage of marine protected areas, significantly greater efforts are needed to ensure these are also being located in areas that are under threat and can therefore yield greatest environmental benefits, and that they are effectively managed.
    [Show full text]