DOCSLIB.ORG

Governance of Protected Areas from Understanding to Action

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Governance of Protected Areas from Understanding to Action Governance of Protected Areas From understanding to action Grazia Borrini-Feyerabend, Nigel Dudley, Tilman Jaeger, Barbara Lassen, Neema Pathak Broome, Adrian Phillips and Trevor Sandwith Developing capacity for a protected planet Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No.20 IUCN WCPA’s BEST PRACTICE PROTECTED AREA GUIDELINES SERIES IUCN-WCPA’s Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines are the world’s authoritative resource for protected area managers. Involving collaboration among specialist practitioners dedicated to supporting better implementation in the field, they distil learning and advice drawn from across IUCN. Applied in the field, they are building institutional and individual capacity to manage protected area systems effectively, equitably and sustainably, and to cope with the myriad of challenges faced in practice. They also assist national governments, protected area agencies, non- governmental organisations, communities and private sector partners to meet their commitments and goals, and especially the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Programme of Work on Protected Areas. A full set of guidelines is available at: www.iucn.org/pa_guidelines Complementary resources are available at: www.cbd.int/protected/tools/ Contribute to developing capacity for a Protected Planet at: www.protectedplanet.net/ IUCN PROTECTED AREA DEFINITION, MANAGEMENT CATEGORIES AND GOVERNANCE TYPES IUCN defines a protected area as: A clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values. The definition is expanded by six management categories (one with a sub-division), summarized below. Ia Strict nature reserve: Strictly protected for biodiversity and also possibly geological/ geomorphological features, where human visitation, use and impacts are controlled and limited to ensure protection of the conservation values Ib Wilderness area: Usually large unmodified or slightly modified areas, retaining their natural character and influence, without permanent or significant human habitation, protected and managed to preserve their natural condition II National park: Large natural or near-natural areas protecting large-scale ecological processes with characteristic species and ecosystems, which also have environmentally and culturally compatible spiritual, scientific, educational, recreational and visitor opportunities III Natural monument or feature: Areas set aside to protect a specific natural monument, which can be a landform, sea mount, marine cavern, geological feature such as a cave, or a living feature such as an ancient grove IV Habitat/species management area: Areas to protect particular species or habitats, where management reflects this priority. Many will need regular, active interventions to meet the needs of particular species or habitats, but this is not a requirement of the category V Protected landscape or seascape: Where the interaction of people and nature over time has produced a distinct character with significant ecological, biological, cultural and scenic value: and where safeguarding the integrity of this interaction is vital to protecting and sustaining the area and its associated nature conservation and other values VI Protected areas with sustainable use of natural resources: Areas which conserve ecosystems, together with associated cultural values and traditional natural resource management systems. Generally large, mainly in a natural condition, with a proportion under sustainable natural resource management and where low-level non-industrial natural resource use compatible with nature conservation is seen as one of the main aims The category should be based around the primary management objective(s), which should apply to at least three-quarters of the protected area – the 75 per cent rule. The management categories are applied with a typology of governance types – a description of who holds authority and responsibility for the protected area. IUCN defines four governance types. Governance by government: Federal or national ministry/agency in charge; sub-national ministry/agency in charge; government-delegated management (e.g. to NGO) Shared governance: Collaborative management (various degrees of influence); joint management (pluralist management board; transboundary management (various levels across international borders) Private governance: By individual owner; by non-profit organisations (NGOs, universities, cooperatives); by for-profit organsations (individuals or corporate) Governance by indigenous peoples and local communities: Indigenous peoples’ conserved areas and territories; community conserved areas – declared and run by local communities For more information on the IUCN definition, categories and governance type see the 2008 Guidelines for applying protected area management categories which can be downloaded at: www.iucn.org/pa_categories Governance of Protected Areas From understanding to action Grazia Borrini-Feyerabend, Nigel Dudley, Tilman Jaeger, Barbara Lassen, Neema Pathak Broome, Adrian Phillips and Trevor Sandwith IUCN (International Union for BMZ Conservation of Nature) The Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development IUCN helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most (BMZ) is responsible for Germany’s development policy. Its tasks pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN include developing guidelines, strategies and implementation works on biodiversity, climate change, energy, human livelihoods rules. The focus is on intergovernmental cooperation with selected and greening the world economy by supporting scientific developing countries. The BMZ commissions its implementing research, managing field projects all over the world, and agencies with the implementation of projects and monitors the results bringing governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together of their work. The BMZ also works for a forward-looking design of to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s development cooperation at the European and global levels and oldest and largest global environmental organization, with makes the position of the German government heard in multilateral more than 1,200 government and NGO members and almost institutions and processes. Non-governmental organisations are also 11,000 volunteer experts in some 160 countries. IUCN’s work important partners. Federal Minister Dirk Niebel, Parliamentary State is supported by over 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of Secretary Gudrun Kopp and State Secretary Hans-Jürgen Beerfeltz partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. form the leadership of the BMZ. The Ministry has a total of nearly 800 www.iucn.org employees at its main office in Bonn, its Berlin office and abroad. www.bmz.de Empowered lives. Resilient nations. BIOPAMA The Biodiversity and Protected Area Management (BIOPAMA) UNDP GEF SMALL GRANTS PROGRAMME programme aims to address threats to biodiversity in African, Caribbean Funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) as a flagship and Pacific (ACP) countries, while reducing poverty in communities in programme, the GEF Small Grants Programme (SGP) is and around protected areas. It is financially supported by resources implemented by the United Nations Development Programme from the intra-ACP envelope of the European Commission’s (EC) 10th (UNDP) on behalf of the GEF, and is executed by the United European Development Fund (EDF). BIOPAMA combines improving Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS). Launched in data availability with capacity development to strengthen protected area 1992, the SGP supports activities of non-governmental management. It has two main components: one concerning protected and community-based organizations in developing areas, jointly implemented by the International Union for Conservation countries towards biodiversity conservation, climate change of Nature (IUCN) and the EC’s Joint Research Centre (JRC), and mitigation and adaptation, protection of international waters, another dealing with access and benefit sharing (ABS), implemented reduction of the impact of chemicals and prevention of land by the Multi-Donor ABS Capacity Development Initiative managed by degradation, while generating sustainable livelihoods. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. http://sgp.undp.org www.biopama.org Implemented by An initiative of the ACP Secretariat funded by the European Union CHRISTENSEN FUND Founded by the Christensen family in 1957, The Christensen Fund supports the efforts of people and institutions who believe in a biodiverse world infused with artistic expression, TILCEPA and works to secure ways of life and landscapes that are The Theme on Indigenous Peoples, Local Communities, beautiful, bountiful and resilient. The Christensen Fund Equity and Protected Areas (TILCEPA) is an inter- focuses on backing the efforts of locally-recognized community Commission body of the IUCN dealing with social policy custodians and their alliances with scholars, artists, advocates aspects of Protected Areas. Over 300 global experts and others. It also funds international efforts to build global contribute to TILCEPA’s work to advise the IUCN, UN understanding of the issues around biocultural diversity. These agencies, governments, national agencies and civil society are challenging goals, so they seek out imaginative, thoughtful on issues of indigenous peoples’ rights,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joola Dynamics Between Senegal and Guinea-Bissau Jordi Tomàs (CEA-ISCTE) Paper Presented at ABORNE Fifth Annual Conference, Lisbon, September 22Th, 2011
    THIS IS REALLY A PRELIMINARY DRAFT. NOT FOR CITATION OR CIRCULATION WITHOUT AUTHOR’S PERMISSION, PLEASE An international border or just a territorial limit? Joola dynamics between Senegal and Guinea-Bissau Jordi Tomàs (CEA-ISCTE) Paper presented at ABORNE Fifth Annual Conference, Lisbon, September 22th, 2011. Introduction This paper aims to present an ongoing research about the dynamics of Joola population in the border between Guinea-Bissau and Senegal (more specifically from the Atlantic Ocean to the Niambalang river). We would like to tell you about how Joola Ajamaat (near the main town of Susanna, Guinea-Bissau) and Joola Huluf (near the main town of Oussouye, Senegal) define the border and, especially, how they use this border in their daily lives1. As most borderland regions in the Upper Guinea Coast, this international border separates two areas that have been economically and politically marginalised within their respective national contexts (Senegal and Guinea-Bissau) in colonial and postcolonial times. Moreover, from 1982 –that is, for almost 30 years– this border area has suffered the conflict between the separatist MFDC (Mouvement des Forces Démocratiques de Casamance) and the Senegalese army (and, in the last few years, the Bissau-Guinean army as well). Despite this situation, the links between the population on both sides are still alive, as we will show later on. After a short historical presentation, we would like to focus on three main subjects. First, to show concrete examples of everyday life gathered during our fieldwork. Secondly, to see how the conflict have affected the relationship between the Joola from both sides of 1 This paper has been made possible thanks to a postdoctoral scholarship granted by FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia).
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite National Park Visitor Study: Winter 2008
    Social Science Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Visitor Services Project Yosemite National Park Visitor Study Winter 2008 Park Studies Unit Visitor Services Project Report 198 Social Science Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Visitor Services Project Yosemite National Park Visitor Study Winter 2008 Park Studies Unit Visitor Services Project Report 198 October 2008 Yen Le Eleonora Papadogiannaki Nancy Holmes Steven J. Hollenhorst Dr. Yen Le is VSP Assistant Director, Eleonora Papadogiannaki and Nancy Holmes are Research Assistants with the Visitor Services Project and Dr. Steven Hollenhorst is the Director of the Park Studies Unit, Department of Conservation Social Sciences, University of Idaho. We thank Jennifer Morse, Paul Reyes, Pixie Siebe, and the staff of Yosemite National Park for assisting with the survey, and David Vollmer for his technical assistance. Yosemite National Park – VSP Visitor Study February 2–10, 2008 Visitor Services Project Yosemite National Park Report Summary • This report describes the results of a visitor study at Yosemite National Park during February 2-10, 2008. A total of 938 questionnaires were distributed to visitor groups. Of those, 563 questionnaires were returned, resulting in a 60% response rate. • This report profiles a systematic random sample of Yosemite National Park. Most results are presented in graphs and frequency tables. Summaries of visitor comments are included in the report and complete comments are included in the Visitor Comments Appendix. • Fifty percent of visitor groups were in groups of two and 25% were in groups of three or four. Sixty percent of visitor groups were in family groups.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NILGIRIS Kms from Ooty and Kotagiri 31 Kms from Ooty, Are the Three Hill Stations of This District
    THE NILGIRIS kms from Ooty and Kotagiri 31 kms from Ooty, are the three hill stations of this district. Geographical Location • The Nilgiris is situated at an elevation of 900 to 2636 meters above MSL. • The Nilgiris is bounded on North by Karnataka State on the East by Coimbatore District, Erode District, South by Coimbatore District and Kerala State and as the West by Kerala State. Important places District Collector: Tmt. J. Innocent Divya • Doddabetta - 2,623 mts above MSL - I.A.S highest Peak in the Tamil Nadu. • The Nilgiri Mountain Train-One among the three Mountain Railways of India designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Three railways, the Darjeeling Himalayan Railway, the Nilgiri Mountain Railway, and the Kalka– Shimla Railway, are collectively designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site under the name Mountain Railways of India. The fourth railway, the Matheran Hill Railway, is on the tentative list of UNESCO World Heritage Sites. REVENUE DIVISIONS: • Mudumalai National Park UDHAGAI • Pykara Waterfalls and the Ooty Lake COONOOR • Botanical Garden – Ooty GUDALUR • Rose Garden - Ooty HISTORY: • Ooty Lake and Boat House • The Name ‘Nilgiris’ means Blue hills the first mention of this name has been found • Raj Bhavan - Ooty in the Silappadikaram. • Dolphin's Nose - Coonoor • One of the oldest mountain ranges, located at the tri-junction of Tamil Nadu, Kerala • Lamb's rock - Coonoor and Karnataka. • Glenmorgan - Ooty • Nilgiris is a part of the Western Ghats. Ooty the “Queen of Hill Stations”, Coonoor 19 • Avalanche - Ooty For any queries mail to: [email protected] Forest • South Western ghats - Nilgiri tahrs are found only in the montane grasslands of the Southwestern Ghats.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks and Iccas in the High Himalayan Region of Nepal: Challenges and Opportunities
    [Downloaded free from http://www.conservationandsociety.org on Tuesday, June 11, 2013, IP: 129.79.203.216] || Click here to download free Android application for this journal Conservation and Society 11(1): 29-45, 2013 Special Section: Article National Parks and ICCAs in the High Himalayan Region of Nepal: Challenges and Opportunities Stan Stevens Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In Nepal, as in many states worldwide, national parks and other protected areas have often been established in the customary territories of indigenous peoples by superimposing state-declared and governed protected areas on pre-existing systems of land use and management which are now internationally considered to be Indigenous Peoples’ and Community Conserved Territories and Areas (ICCAs, also referred to Community Conserved Areas, CCAs). State intervention often ignores or suppresses ICCAs, inadvertently or deliberately undermining and destroying them along with other aspects of indigenous peoples’ cultures, livelihoods, self-governance, and self-determination. Nepal’s high Himalayan national parks, however, provide examples of how some indigenous peoples such as the Sharwa (Sherpa) of Sagarmatha (Mount Everest/Chomolungma) National Park (SNP) have continued to maintain customary ICCAs and even to develop new ones despite lack of state recognition, respect, and coordination. The survival of these ICCAs offers Nepal an opportunity to reform existing laws, policies, and practices, both to honour UN-recognised human and indigenous rights that support ICCAs and to meet International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) standards and guidelines for ICCA recognition and for the governance and management of protected areas established in indigenous peoples’ territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Nilgiris District, Tamil Nadu Connie Smith Tamil Nadu Overview
    Nilgiris District, Tamil Nadu Connie Smith Tamil Nadu Overview Tamil Nadu is bordered by Pondicherry, Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. Sri Lanka, which has a significant Tamil minority, lies off the southeast coast. Tamil Nadu, with its traceable history of continuous human habitation since pre-historic times has cultural traditions amongst the oldest in the world. Colonised by the East India Company, Tamil Nadu was eventually incorporated into the Madras Presidency. After the independence of India, the state of Tamil Nadu was created in 1969 based on linguistic boundaries. The politics of Tamil Nadu has been dominated by DMK and AIADMK, which are the products of the Dravidian movement that demanded concessions for the 'Dravidian' population of Tamil Nadu. Lying on a low plain along the southeastern coast of the Indian peninsula, Tamil Nadu is bounded by the Eastern Ghats in the north and Nilgiri, Anai Malai hills and Palakkad (Palghat Gap) on the west. The state has large fertile areas along the Coromandel coast, the Palk strait, and the Gulf of Mannar. The fertile plains of Tamil Nadu are fed by rivers such as Kaveri, Palar and Vaigai and by the northeast monsoon. Traditionally an agricultural state, Tamil Nadu is a leading producer of agricultural products. Tribal Population As per 2001 census, out of the total state population of 62,405,679, the population of Scheduled Castes is 11,857,504 and that of Scheduled Tribes is 651,321. This constitutes 19% and 1.04% of the total population respectively.1 Further, the literacy level of the Adi Dravidar is only 63.19% and that of Tribal is 41.53%.
    [Show full text]
  • Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing Aa, Bart J.M
    University of Groningen Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing Aa, Bart J.M. van der IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Aa, B. J. M. V. D. (2005). Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 Appendix 4 World heritage site nominations Listed site in May 2004 (year of rejection, year of listing, possible year of extension of the site) Rejected site and not listed until May 2004 (first year of rejection) Afghanistan Península Valdés (1999) Jam,
    [Show full text]
  • A Shared Identity
    The A SEAN ISSUE 01 | MAY 2020 A Shared Identity Becoming ASEAN ISSN 2721-8058 SHIFTING CURRENTS THE INSIDE VIEW SNAPSHOTS COVID-19: A Collective Unity, Diversity ASEAN Heritage Park Conference Response in ASEAN and ASEAN Identity Highlights Sustainability and Innovation ASEAN CULTURAL HERITAGE Take a Virtual Tour Story on Page 16 Manjusri Sculpture is from a collection of the National Museum of Indonesia. The sculpture carries © Ahttps://heritage.asean.org/ and National Museum of Indonesia great national value for being an iconographic-innovation and the only silver-metal artwork from the Hindu- Buddha period found in the archipelago. Photo Credit: https://heritage.asean.org/ Contents 3 In this issue 22 Secretary-General of ASEAN Dato Lim Jock Hoi Deputy Secretary-General of ASEAN for ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC) Kung Phoak EDITORIAL BOARD Directors of ASCC Directorates Rodora T. Babaran, Ky-Anh Nguyen Assistant Directors of ASCC Divisions Ferdinal Fernando, Jonathan Tan, The Inside View: ASEAN Identity Shifting Currents Mary Anne Therese Manuson, Mega Irena, Ngoc Son Nguyen, Sita Sumrit, Sophearin Chea, Unity, Diversity and the ASEAN Identity 8 Health 30 Vong Sok ASEAN Awareness Poll 10 COVID-19: A Collective Response in ASEAN EDITORIAL TEAM Interview with Indonesian Foreign Minister Editor-in-Chief Opinion: Retno Marsudi 12 Mary Kathleen Quiano-Castro Stop the Prejudice, a Virus Has No Race 36 Fostering ASEAN Identity 14 Associate Editor Fighting Fear and Fake News ASEAN Going Digital 16 Joanne B. Agbisit in a Pandemic 38
    [Show full text]
  • Full Journal Issue 41
    ISSUEISSUE 41,41, PUBLISHEDPUBLISHED 11 AUGUSTAUGUST 20192019 AustralasianAustralasian JournalJournal ofof HerpetologyHerpetology ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) CONTENTS ON PAGE 2 2 Australasian Journal of Herpetology Australasian Journal of Herpetology Issue 41, 1 August 2019. Contents Record clutch sizes and record body sizes for Copperheads (Austrelaps, Worrell, 1963) (Serpentes: Elapidae). ... Raymond T. Hoser, 3-4. Asiatic Waterside Skinks, Tropidophorus Duméril and Bibron, 1839. A long overdue break up of the archaic genus sensu-lato, resulting in a total of eight genera, three resurrected from synonymy, four named for the first time and the additional descriptions of three new species. ... Raymond T. Hoser, 5-17. Further dismemberment of the pan-continental Lizard genus Scincella Mittleman, 1950 with the creation of four new genera to accommodate divergent species and the formal descriptions of six new species. ... Raymond T. Hoser, 18-28. Six new genera of skinks associated with Lipinia Gray, 1845 based on morphological and evolutionary divergence as well as twenty seven previously undiagnosed species within the same assemblage. ... Raymond T. Hoser, 29-61. A new subspecies of Mountain Dragon, Rankinia hoserae Hoser, 2015 from the Brindabella Ranges of south-east Australia. ... Raymond T. Hoser, 62-64. Front cover photo: Raymond Hoser. Adult female Lowlands Copperhead Austrelaps superbus (Günther, 1858) that gave birth to 35 live young on 24 February 2019. Australasian Journal of Herpetology ® Publishes original research in printed form in relation to reptiles, other fauna and related matters, including classification, ecology, public interest, legal, captivity, “academic misconduct”, etc. It is a peer reviewed printed journal published in hard copy for permanent public scientific record in accordance with the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Ride et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Capeverdean Words Derived from Portuguese Non-Infinitive Verbal Forms: a Descriptive and Comparative Study Nicolas Quint
    Capeverdean words derived from Portuguese non-infinitive verbal forms: a descriptive and comparative study Nicolas Quint To cite this version: Nicolas Quint. Capeverdean words derived from Portuguese non-infinitive verbal forms: a descriptive and comparative study. Papia, 2015, 2 (25), pp.189 - 215. halshs-01482124 HAL Id: halshs-01482124 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01482124 Submitted on 8 Mar 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. PAPIA, São Paulo, 25(2), p. 189-215, Jul/Dez 2015. Capeverdean words derived from Portuguese non-infinitive verbal forms: a descriptive and comparative study Palavras do cabo-verdiano derivadas de formas verbais não-infinitivas: um estudo descritivo e comparativo Nicolas Quint1 llacan, Villejuif, France [email protected] Abstract: This article focuses on Santiaguense Capeverdean words derived from Portuguese non-infinitive verbal forms and among these, more specifically on those elements which were not recently borrowed from modern Portuguese and do not compete with Capeverdean more basilectal items. In section 1, the category of Capeverdean words under scrutiny is defined contrastively with other similar types of words. In section 2, all known members of this category are examined in turn and according to the characteristics of their respective Portuguese sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecotourism – Sustainable Tourism in National Parks and Protected Areas
    Ecotourism – Sustainable Tourism in National Parks and Protected Areas Banff National Park in Canada and Nationalpark Gesäuse in Austria – a Comparison TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction...................................................................................................... - 6 - Executive Summary................................................................................................ - 7 - 2 Tourism ........................................................................................................... - 9 - 2.1 Definition and Evolution of Tourism.......................................................... - 9 - 2.2 Trends in Tourism .................................................................................. - 10 - 2.2.1 Growth of Mass Tourism................................................................. - 12 - 2.2.2 Contemporary and Alternative Tourism........................................... - 12 - 2.3 Growing Environmental Consciousness in Tourism ............................... - 13 - 3 Sustainable Development.............................................................................. - 14 - 3.1 Sustainable Development – Development for Future Generations ........ - 15 - 3.2 Sustainability as a Key Element............................................................. - 15 - 3.3 Sustainability in Tourism ........................................................................ - 16 - 3.4 Sustainable Tourism and its Role in Sustainable Development ............. - 17 - 4 Ecotourism ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The National Park System
    January 2009 Parks and Recreation in the United States The National Park System Margaret Walls BACKGROUNDER 1616 P St. NW Washington, DC 20036 202-328-5000 www.rff.org Resources for the Future Walls Parks and Recreation in the United States: The National Park System Margaret Walls∗ Introduction The National Park Service, a bureau within the U.S. Department of the Interior, is responsible for managing 391 sites—including national monuments, national recreation areas, national rivers, national parks, various types of historic sites, and other categories of protected lands—that cover 84 million acres. Some of the sites, such as Yellowstone National Park and the Grand Canyon, are viewed as iconic symbols of America. But the National Park Service also manages a number of small historical sites, military parks, scenic parkways, the National Mall in Washington, DC, and a variety of other protected locations. In this backgrounder, we provide a brief history of the Park Service, show trends in land acreage managed by the bureau and visitation at National Park Service sites over time, show funding trends, and present the challenges and issues facing the Park Service today. History National parks were created before there was a National Park Service. President Ulysses S. Grant first set aside land for a “public park” in 1872 with the founding of Yellowstone. Yosemite, General Grant (now part of Kings Canyon), and Sequoia National Parks in California were created in 1890, and nine years later Mount Rainier National Park was set aside in Washington. With passage of the Antiquities Act in 1906, the President was granted authority to declare historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and sites of scientific interest as national monuments.
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Text (PDF)
    Vol. 16(2), pp. 52-67, April-June, 2021 DOI: 10.5897/IJPS2020.4918 Article Number: F75C6AB66527 ISSN 1992-1950 Copyright©2021 International Journal of Physical Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS Sciences Full Length Research Paper Analysis of wind distribution and potential wind energy in Senegal with a focus on Basse Casamance Hamady N. Sabaly1, Jules Basse1, Ibrahima Diba1, Alioune B. Sarr1 and Moctar Camara1* Laboratoire d'Océanographie des Sciences de l'Environment et du Climat (LOSEC), Université Assane Seck, 523, Ziguinchor, Sénégal. Received 20 September, 2020; Accepted 11 March, 2021 This work uses the Weibull distribution for assessing the wind potential in Senegal; a country located in West Africa. In this study, data from the ERA5 reanalysis and the Ziguinchor station were used to characterize the spatio-temporal variability of wind and its available power density at 10 m and 100 m of altitude. The results showed that the wind potential was stronger on the coast and the north-western part of the country. A case study was carried out in the Basse Casamance on five (5) different sites located on the coast and inland (Kafountine, Diembering, Kabrousse, Bignona, and Ziguinhor). The results show good wind potentials in the coastal areas: Kabrousse, Kafountine, and Diembering. The most favourable period for wind power production is the winter. The ERA5 data and those of the Ziguinchor weather station were also compared. The results showed that the annual average wind power density calculated with the ERA5 reanalysis was slightly higher than that of the data from the station.
    [Show full text]