DOCSLIB.ORG

Holocene Archaeology and Ngarrindjeri Ruwe/Ruwar (Land, Body, Spirit): a Critical Indigenous Approach to Understanding the Lower Murray River, South Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Holocene Archaeology and Ngarrindjeri Ruwe/Ruwar (Land, Body, Spirit): a Critical Indigenous Approach to Understanding the Lower Murray River, South Australia Holocene Archaeology and Ngarrindjeri Ruwe/Ruwar (Land, Body, Spirit): A Critical Indigenous Approach to Understanding the Lower Murray River, South Australia Christopher John Wilson, B.A. (Hons) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Archaeology, School of Humanities, Faculty of Education, Humanities and Law at Flinders University, Adelaide April 2017 “For all Ngarrindjeri people… … past, present and future” This thesis is dedicated to my daughters Mikayla and Rylee In memory of a dear friend and colleague Naomi (Jane) Anderson-Sibsado & for Ngarrindjeri Elders who have passed during candidature i Inset Page (From left to right): Mikayla Durkin-Wilson and Rylee Durkin-Wilson on the mosaic tail of Kondoli (whale) at Victor Harbor, 2012 (Picture taken by Chris Wilson) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................... III LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ VII LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................................... X ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................ XI CANDIDATE DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................. XIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................................................... XIV PUBLICATIONS INFORMING THIS DOCTORATE ............................................................................................ XVII NGARRINDJERI ELDERS (KORNIS) ............................................................................................................... XVIII NGARRINDJERI ELDERS (KORNIS) (CONTD) ................................................................................................ XIX NGARRINDJERI ELDERS (MEMENIS) ............................................................................................................... XX NGARRINDJERI COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND LEADERS (MEMINIS AND KORNIS) ............................... XXI NGARRINDJERI HERITAGE SPECIALISTS AND ADVISERS (NON-INDIGENOUS) .................................. XXII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................. XXIII GLOSSARY OF NGARRINDJERI WORDS AND PLACE NAMES .............................................................. XXVII 1 EXPERIENCES OF BEING NGARRINDJERI AND THE RESEARCH CONTEXT ...................................... 29 1.1 From the Beginning: Experiences of Being Ngarrindjeri .......................................................................... 29 1.1.1 Experiences in ‘Suburbia’ ................................................................................................................ 37 1.1.2 ‘Becoming’ a Ngarrindjeri Archaeologist? ........................................................................................ 39 1.2 Ngarrindjeri Regional Governance and Nation Philosophy ..................................................................... 42 1.3 Contextualising the Research Environment ............................................................................................ 42 1.4 Community Based Archaeology .............................................................................................................. 46 1.5 Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 47 2 ‘ARCHAEOLOGICAL’ INVESTIGATIONS OF THE LOWER MURRAY ...................................................... 50 2.1 An Archaeological History of Shell Midden Research ............................................................................. 50 2.2 Mid- to Late Holocene Chronologies and Debates in Australia ............................................................... 52 2.3 ‘Ethnography’ and Challanges with Archaeological Interpretations ......................................................... 54 2.4 Research Significance and Aims ............................................................................................................. 56 2.5 Research Questions ................................................................................................................................ 56 2.6 Overview of Thesis .................................................................................................................................. 59 3 NGARRINDJERI KNOWLEDGES, COLONIALISM & THE LOWER MURRAY .......................................... 61 3.1 Ngurunderi: Creation Ancestor of the Lower Murray ............................................................................... 61 3.2 Overview of European Colonisation ........................................................................................................ 68 3.3 Colonial (Mis)Representations of Ngarrindjeri Life Ways ........................................................................ 74 3.4 Ngarrindjeri Agency and Social Justice ................................................................................................... 76 iii 3.5 Regional Governance and Self-Determination ........................................................................................ 78 3.6 The Lower Murray Cultural and Archaeological Landscape .................................................................... 80 3.7 Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 84 4 ENVIRONMENTAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXT ......................................................................... 85 4.1 Geographic Setting.................................................................................................................................. 85 4.2 Geology and Geomorphology ................................................................................................................. 87 4.3 Palaeoenvironmental Context ................................................................................................................. 88 4.4 Climate .................................................................................................................................................... 89 4.5 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................ 89 4.6 Flora ........................................................................................................................................................ 92 4.7 Fauna ...................................................................................................................................................... 92 4.8 The Regional Archaeological Record ...................................................................................................... 95 4.8.1 Roonka ............................................................................................................................................ 97 4.8.2 Kangerunk ....................................................................................................................................... 98 4.8.3 Ngaut Ngaut (Devon Downs) and Tartanga .................................................................................... 99 4.8.4 Fromms Landing ........................................................................................................................... 100 4.8.5 Coorong and Wyrie Swamp .......................................................................................................... 100 4.8.6 Swan Reach .................................................................................................................................. 101 4.9 Previous Cultural Heritage and Archaeological Surveys ....................................................................... 102 4.9.1 Community Negotiations and Protocols ........................................................................................ 106 4.9.2 Liaising with Government and Heritage Agencies ......................................................................... 106 4.10 Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 107 5 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................. 108 5.1 Profiling Indigenous People and Archaeological Training in Australia ................................................... 109 5.2 Indigenous Archaeologies and the Australian Context .......................................................................... 111 5.3 Indigenous Research and Academic Discourse .................................................................................... 117 5.4 Standpoint Theory and Indigenous Research ....................................................................................... 119 5.5 Post-Processual and Interpretative Archaeologies ...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Can’T Be What You Can’T See’: the Transition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Students Into Higher Education
    ‘Can’t be what you can’t see’: The Transition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Students into higher education Literature Review 2014 Fremantle Broome Sydney Cover Artwork: ‘Seeing Country’ by Yangkana Laurel Yangkana Laurel is a Walmajarri artist and educator from the Kadjina Community in the Kimberley region of Western Australia on the edge of the Great Sandy Desert - part of Millijidee Station. Along with her sisters, brothers and mothers, Yangkana advocated to set up the remote Wulungarra Community School. Yangkana’s commitment to education in this small community is replicated across the many universities we visited and encapsulated in the innovative models that support more Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students to transition to higher education. ‘Can’t be what you can’t see’: The Transition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Students into higher education Literature Review 2014 The University of Notre Dame Australia (UNDA) Southern Cross University (SCU) Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education (BIITE) Project Leaders: Professor Lyn Henderson-Yates (UNDA), Professor Patrick Dodson (UNDA), Professor Marguerite Maher (UNDA), Project Management: Bruce Gorring (UNDA), Sue Thomas (UNDA) Project Team Members: Stephen Kinnane (UNDA), Dr Judith Wilks (SCU), Katie Wilson (SCU), Terri Hughes (BIITE), Sue Thomas (UNDA), Professor Neil Drew (UNDA), Dr Keith McNaught (UNDA), Dr Kevin Watson (UNDA) Report Authors: Dr Judith Wilks (SCU), Katie Wilson (SCU) “Can’t be what you can’t see”: The Transition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students into higher education: Literature Review: 20/12/13 OLT ID SI11-2138 (UNDA; SCU; BIITE) Support for the production of this report/publication has been provided by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern & Hills Local Government
    HDS Australia Civil Engineers and Project Managers Southern & Hills Local Government Association 2020 TRANSPORT PLAN – 2015 UPDATE Adelaide Final Report Melbourne Hong Kong HDS Australia Pty Ltd 277 Magill Road Trinity Gardens SA 5068 telephone +61 8 8333 3760 facsimile +61 8 8333 3079 email [email protected] www.hdsaustralia.com.au December 2016 Safe and Sustainable Road Transport Planning Solutions Southern & Hills Local Government Association HDS Australia Pty Ltd Key Regional Transport Infrastructure Initiatives Freight Development of the South Coast Freight Corridor as a primary cross regional gazetted 26m B-Double GML route (ultimately upgraded to a PBS Level 2A route) running from Cape Jervis, via Victor Harbor and Strathalbyn, to the South East Freeway Interchange at Callington, with a branch to Mount Barker. Development of the Southern Vales Wine Freight Corridor as a secondary cross regional gazetted 26m B-Double GML route running from McLaren Vale to the South East Freeway Interchange at Mount Barker. Development of the Kangaroo Island Freight Corridor as a secondary cross regional gazetted 23m B-Double GML route (upgraded to 26m B- Double when the Sealink Ferry capability permits) running from Gosse to Penneshaw, then via the Ferry to Cape Jervis. Tourism Development of the Fleurieu Way as a primary cross regional tourism route, suitably signposted and promoted, from Wellington, via Strathalbyn, Goolwa, Victor Harbor, Delamere / Cape Jervis, Normanville / Yankalilla, Aldinga, Willunga and McLaren Vale, to Adelaide. Development of the Kangaroo Island South Coast Loop and North Coast Loop as primary regional tourism routes, suitably signposted and promoted, and connected via the Sealink Ferry and the Fleurieu Way to Adelaide and Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleurieu Peninsula
    Fleurieu Peninsula Coastal Boundary Reference Map Index 250000 300000 6100000 Strathalbyn Major Roads Fleurieu Map Blocks Fleurieu Coastal Boundary Fleurieu Councils Of Interest Dodd Beach Map Block ALEXANDRINA COUNCIL Myponga Map Block 0 10 Yankalilla Normanville Kms Map Block Rapid Head Port Elliot Map Block Map Block Goolwa THE DC OF YANKALILLA CITY OF VICTOR HARBOR Murray Mouth Wirrina Cove Victor Harbor Map Block Map Block Map Block Goolwa Victor Harbor Map Block Cape Jervis Cape Jervis Tunkalilla Beach Parsons Beach Newland Head Map Block Map Block Map Block Map Block Deep Creek CP Map Block West Island Map Block Produced by Environmental Information 6050000 Department for Environment and Heritage PO Box 550 Marleston SA 5033 Web: www.environment.sa.gov.au/mapland Data Source Coastal Boundary - EI & CPB - DEH Veg Block Data - EI & CPB - DEH Base Data - Topo Data - DEH Projection Lambert Conformal Conic Compiled 11 April 2006 6050000 Datum Geocentric Datum of Australia, 1994 Grid MGA - Zone 54 © Copyright Department for Environment and Heritage 2005. All Rights Reserved. All works and information displayed are subject to Copyright. For the reproduction Or publication beyond that permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth) written permission must be sought from the Department. Although every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information displayed, the Department, its agents, officers and employees make no representations, either express or implied, that the information displayed is accurate or fit for any purpose
    [Show full text]
  • Kungun Ngarrindjeri Yunnan Agreement Listening to Ngarrindjeri People Talking KNYA Taskforce Report 2010-11
    Kungun Ngarrindjeri Yunnan Agreement Listening to Ngarrindjeri People talking KNYA Taskforce Report 2010-11 www.environment.sa.gov.au Acknowledgements The Ngarrindjeri people are the descendents of the original indigenous inhabitants of the lands and waters of the Murray River, Lower Lakes and Coorong and adjacent areas. Ngarrindjeri have occupied, enjoyed, utilised and managed these traditional homelands since time immemorial. The South Australian Government acknowledges Ngarrindjeri are the Traditional Owners of the land and that according to their traditions, customs and spiritual beliefs its lands and waters remain their traditional country. The State also acknowledges and respects the rights, interests and obligations of Ngarrindjeri to speak and care for their traditional country, lands and waters in accordance with their laws, customs, beliefs and traditions. The KNYA Taskforce Planning Workshop was part of the South Australian Government’s Murray Futures program, funded by the Australian Government’s Water for the Future program. Caution when reading this report The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) will always make every effort to respect Ngarrindjeri cultural sensitivities when featuring images or names of people who have recently died. However please be advised that this document may contain images of persons who have died after this Annual Report was finalised in January 2012 and we offer our apologies for any distress caused if this occurs. Younghusband Peninsula in Coorong National Park Contents In Memory of the late Ngarrindjeri Chairs of the KNYA Taskforce . .. 5 Messages from the Co-chairpersons of the Taskforce . 6 KNYA Purpose . 8 Our Performance – KNYA Taskforce Review of 2010-11 .
    [Show full text]
  • Rosetta Head Well and Whaling Station Site PLACE NO.: 26454
    South Australian HERITAGE COUNCIL SUMMARY OF STATE HERITAGE PLACE REGISTER ENTRY Entry in the South Australian Heritage Register in accordance with the Heritage Places Act 1993 NAME: Rosetta Head Well and Whaling Station Site PLACE NO.: 26454 ADDRESS: Franklin Parade, Encounter Bay, SA 5211 Uncovered well 23 November 2017 Site works complete June 2019 Source DEW Source DEW Cultural Safety Warning Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples should be aware that this document may contain images or names of people who have since passed away. STATEMENT OF HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE The Rosetta Head Well and Whaling Station Site is on the lands and waters of the Ramindjeri people of the lower Fleurieu Peninsula, who are a part of the Ngarrindjeri Nation. The site represents a once significant early industry that no longer exists in South Australia. Founded by the South Australian Company in 1837 and continually operating until 1851, it was the longest-running whaling station in the State. It played an important role in the establishment of the whaling industry in South Australia as a prototype for other whaling stations and made a notable contribution to the fledgling colony’s economic development. The Rosetta Head Whaling Station is also an important contact site between European colonists and the Ramindjeri people. To Ramindjeri people, the whale is known as Kondli (a spiritual being), and due to their connection and knowledge, a number of Ramindjeri were employed at the station as labourers and boat crews. Therefore, Rosetta Head is one of the first places in South Australia where European and Aboriginal people worked side by side.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Invasive Species in Illinois
    Illinois Needs Heroes: Aquatic Invader Prevention Programs Greg Hitzroth Illinois Lake Management Association Conference 2018 Bloomington Illinois Rambling Presentation Directory • Background • Aquatic Pet Take Back Events and Network • Aquatic Invader Boat Decontamination Zones • Invasive Crayfish Collaborative • Some up and Coming Potential Invasives Combines research, education Guardian and recorder of and outreach to empower Illinois biological resources. southern Lake Michigan Foster an understanding and communities to secure a appreciation of our natural healthy environment and economy. heritage through outreach. Transport -> Introduce -> Establish -> Spread -> Impact Kolar and Lodge 2001 Aquatic Pets and Aquatic Invaders Commercial activity involving organisms in trade is one of the principal ways in which non-native organisms have been introduced into the Laurentian Great Lakes Keller and Lodge 2007 Organisms in Trade Pathway • Species have been established in the Great Lakes through aquarium release(17), planted (23) and bait release (9) (GLANSIS search Oct 6th, 2016) • 9 million households with ornamental fish (Chapman et al 1997) • 7% - 25% hobbyists release ornamentals (Gertzen et al 2008, Seekamp et al 2016) Pet Surrender Events Illinois Organizations and People IISG/INHS University of Illinois Legal Illinois Department of Natural Resources Conservation Police Biologists Regulatory IL Department of Agriculture Animal welfare/State Veterinarian US Fish and Wildlife Animal Control Aquarium Fish Sanctuary Chicago Herpetological
    [Show full text]
  • A Collaborative History of Social Innovation in South Australia
    Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable Societies University of South Australia St Bernards Road Magill South Australia 5072 Australia www.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute © Rob Manwaring and University of South Australia 2008 A COLLABORATIVE HISTORY OF SOCIAL INNOVATION IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA Rob Manwaring∗ Abstract In this paper I outline a collaborative history of social innovation in South Australia, a state that has a striking record of social innovation. What makes this history so intriguing is that on the face of it, South Australia would seem an unlikely location for such experimentation. This paper outlines the main periods of innovation. Appended to it is the first attempt to collate all these social innovations in one document. This paper is unique in that its account of the history of social innovation has been derived after public consultation in South Australia, and is a key output from Geoff Mulgan’s role as an Adelaide Thinker in Residence.1 The paper analyses why, at times, South Australia appears to have punched above its weight as a leader in social innovation. Drawing on Giddens’ ‘structuration’ model, the paper uses South Australian history as a case study to determine how far structure and/or agency can explain the main periods of social innovation. Introduction South Australia has a great and rich (albeit uneven) history of social innovation, and has at times punched above its weight. What makes this history so intriguing is that on the face of it, South Australia is quite an unlikely place for such innovation. South Australia is a relatively new entity; it has a relatively small but highly urbanised population, and is geographically isolated from other Australian urban centres and other developed nations.
    [Show full text]
  • SUTTON"'-'-Paoijio Gull
    54 The S.A. Ornithologist; April 1, 193f>' SUTTON"'-'-Paoijio Gull. Gabianus pacificus, Pacific Gull. By J. Sutton. Th!~ .hird, the largest of the A~straIian Gulls, which ranges from Shark's Bay; 'IN.A., to Rcckhampton, Q., including 'I'as.. mania, is round about the South Australian coasts and adjacent i~lands, its prominent feature being the large lance-shaped bill. The following is J. Gould's description of the adultc->-" Head, neck, upper part of the back, all the under surface, upper and under tail coverts, white; back and wings, dark slaty black, the secondaries largely tipped with white, primaries black, the innermost slightly tipped with white; tail, .white, the inner web of the outer feather and both webs of' the remainder crossed near the tip with a broad band of black; irides, pearl white; eyelid; yellow; bill, orange stained with blood-red at the tip, in the midst of which in some specimens ate til few blotches of black; legs, yellow; claws, bla<lk." . Professor J. B. Cleland, in Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of South Australia; Vol. XLVII, 1925, pp. 119-126, on The Birds df the Pearson Islands, wrote:-" A full­ plumaged female bird, in attempting to steal g, bait, got entangled in a fishing line that had been temporarily left unattended. Iris, white; eyelid, orange; base of bill, chrome; distal third of bill, ted with dark grey along the cutting edge; inside of bill, chrome; tongue and floor of mouth between rami of lower bill, orange: g~pe, .orange, except fot a narrow chrome..coloured outer edge; legs, maize yellow; total length, 58.4 cm.; span across out.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meeting of Matthew Flinders and Nicolas Baudin
    A Cordial Encounter? 53 A Cordial Encounter? The Meeting of Matthew Flinders and Nicolas Baudin (8-9 April, 1802) Jean Fornasiero and John West-Sooby1 The famous encounter between Nicolas Baudin and Matthew Flinders in the waters off Australia’s previously uncharted south coast has now entered the nation’s folklore. At a time when their respective countries were locked in conflict at home and competing for strategic advantage on the world stage, the two captains were able to set aside national rivalries and personal disappointments in order to greet one another with courtesy and mutual respect. Their meeting is thus portrayed as symbolic of the triumph of international co-operation over the troubled geopolitics of the day. What united the two expeditions—the quest for knowledge in the spirit of the Enlightenment—proved to be stronger than what divided them. This enduring—and endearing—image of the encounter between Baudin and Flinders is certainly well supported by the facts as we know them. The two captains did indeed conduct themselves on that occasion in an exemplary manner, readily exchanging information about their respective discoveries and advising one another about the navigational hazards they should avoid or about safe anchorages where water and other supplies could be obtained. Furthermore, the civility of their meeting points to a strong degree of mutual respect, and perhaps also to a recognition of their shared experience as navigators whom fate had thrown together on the lonely and treacherous shores of the “unknown coast” of Australia. And yet, as appealing as it may be, this increasingly idealized image of the encounter runs the risk of masking some of its subtleties and complexities.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Cluttering up the Department'
    Wooden sculpture of a human male collected by Berndt, 1946–7 by Leigerang Dalawongu people, north-east Arnhem Land courtesy Buku-Larrnggay Mulka Centre National Museum of Australia ‘Cluttering up the department’ Ronald Berndt and the distribution of the University of Sydney ethnographic collection by Geoffrey Gray Abstract we should not revisit the issue of how the ANRC collection was made, the way it was The issue of ownership of cultural objects broken up and distributed, the circumstances collected by fieldworkers sponsored by around its distribution and the question of the Australian National Research Council ownership — does it reside with the collector, (ANRC) between 1926 and 1955, when the the institution housing the collection, or ANRC was replaced by the Academy of the funding body? This paper traces Ronald Science, is now in a sense passé, as these Berndt’s attempts to assert ownership collections have been broken up, and now over part of the collection housed at the reside in diverse centres both nationally and University of Sydney, at the two moments of internationally. This does not mean that its redistribution, 1957 and 1980. reCollections: Journal of the National Museum of Australia September 2007, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 153–79 Introduction Scattered among the ethnographic collections of several Australian and overseas museums are a large number of objects originally collected between 1927 and 1956 by anthropologists sponsored by the Australian National Research Council (ANRC). These expeditions covered many parts of northern Australia, particularly the north-west Kimberley in Western Australia, Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory and Cape York Peninsula, North Queensland.
    [Show full text]
  • A Large Mid-Holocene Estuary Was Not Present in the Lower River Murray
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A large mid‑Holocene estuary MATTERS ARISING was not present in the lower River Murray, Australia J. Tibby 1,2,6*, B. Bourman1,3,4, C. Wilson 5,6, L. M. Mosley7, A. P. Belperio8, D. D. Ryan 9, P. A. Hesp 10, C. V. Murray‑Wallace11, G. Miot da Silva10, S. R. Dillenburg 12 & D. Haynes2,13 arising from: A. M. Helfensdorfer et al.; Scientifc Reports https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​s41598-​019-​39516-4​(2019). arising from: A. M. Helfensdorfer et al.; Scientifc Reports https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​s41598-​020-​61800-x​(2020). Recent research has suggested that during the mid-Holocene (c. 8500 to 5000 cal yr BP) a large estuary occupied the lower River Murray and its terminal lakes (Lakes Alexandrina and Albert: herein the Lower Lakes) in South Australia. Tis research has questioned both reconstructions of past River Murray discharge and contemporary environmental water provisions aimed at maintaining the freshwater state of the Lower Lakes. We show that (1) a large mid-Holocene estuary extending into the lower River Murray was not physically possible, and (2) that the River Murray and Lower Lakes were predominantly fresh during the mid-Holocene. Sea level was well below present at the time of purported initiation of estuarine sedimentation and, therefore, could not have allowed formation of an estuary. Holocene human occupation of the lower River Murray valley, that was reliant on freshwater resources, negates the existence of a large estuary in the valley. A variety of freshwater indicators in sediments from in, and around, the Lower Lakes negate the notion of signifcant marine incursion.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrival of Non-Indigenous Crayfish Species
    Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2016, 417, 37 Knowledge & © G. Kotovska et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2016 Management of Aquatic DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2016024 Ecosystems www.kmae-journal.org Journal fully supported by Onema RESEARCH PAPER East European crayfish stocks at risk: arrival of non-indigenous crayfish species Ganna Kotovska1, Dmytro Khrystenko1,2,*,Jiří Patoka3,a and Antonín Kouba4,a 1 Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Obuhivska 135, Kyiv 03164, Ukraine 2 Cornell University, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, International Programs, B75 Mann Library, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 3 Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Kamycká 129, Prague 6–Suchdol 165 21, Czech Republic 4 University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zátisí 728/II, Vodňany 389 25, Czech Republic Abstract – An increasing number of non-indigenous crayfish species (NICS) of apparently pet trade origin have become established particularly in Europe. Especially alarming are recent confirmation of two distantly separated marbled crayfish Procambarus fallax f. virginalis populations in Ukraine and indications of more North American cambarids present in the local pet market. The present study aimed to investigate crayfish species availability within the Ukrainian pet trade together with the climate match and risk they represent to the freshwater ecosystems generally and indigenous crayfish species in particular. Altogether, 15 NICS belonging to all three crayfish families were detected. Considering their origin, availability, probability of establishment, invasiveness and further aspects, marbled crayfish and red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii appear to be potentially the most troubling.
    [Show full text]