DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:0712.0004V1 [Astro-Ph] 30 Nov 2007 Erhcuclo Aaa H Etentoa El Ehrh Sc Recherche La De National Centre Hawaii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:0712.0004V1 [Astro-Ph] 30 Nov 2007 Erhcuclo Aaa H Etentoa El Ehrh Sc Recherche La De National Centre Hawaii The On/Off Nature of Star-Planet Interactions1 Evgenya Shkolnik NASA Astrobiology Institute, University of Hawaii at Manoa 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822 [email protected] David A. Bohlender Herzberg Institute for Astrophysics, National Research Council of Canada Victoria BC, Canada V9E 2E7 [email protected] Gordon A.H. Walker 1234 Hewlett Place, Victoria, BC, V8S 4P7 [email protected] and Andrew Collier Cameron School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS [email protected] arXiv:0712.0004v1 [astro-ph] 30 Nov 2007 ABSTRACT Evidence suggesting an observable magnetic interaction between a star and its hot Jupiter (Porb < 7 days, a< 0.1 AU, Mpsini> 0.2 MJ ) appears as a cyclic variation of stellar activity synchronized to the planet’s orbit. In this study, we monitored the chromospheric activity of 7 stars with hot Jupiters using new high-resolution ´echelle spectra collected with ESPaDOnS over a few nights in 1Based on observations collected at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope operated by the National Re- search Council of Canada, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique of France, and the University of Hawaii. –2– 2005 and 2006 from the CFHT. We searched for variability in several stellar activity indicators (Ca II H λ3968, K λ3933, the Ca II infrared triplet (IRT) λ8662 line, Hα λ6563 and He I λ5876). HD 179949 has been observed almost every year since 2001. Synchronicity of the Ca II H & K emission with the orbit is clearly seen in four out of six epochs, while rotational modulation with Prot=7 days is apparent in the other two seasons. We observe a similar phenomenon on υ And, which displays rotational modulation (Prot=12 days) in September 2005, in 2002 and 2003 variations appear to correlate with the planet’s orbital period. This on/off nature of star-planet interaction (SPI) in the two systems is likely a function of the changing stellar magnetic field structure throughout its activity cycle. Variability in the transiting system HD 189733 is likely associated with an active region rotating with the star, however, the flaring in excess of the rotational modulation may be associated with its hot Jupiter. As for HD 179949, the peak variability as measured by the mean absolute deviation (MAD) for both HD 189733 and τ Boo leads the sub-planetary longitude by ∼ 70◦. The tentative correlation between this activity and the ratio of Mpsini to the planet’s rotation period, a quantity proportional to the hot Jupiter’s magnetic moment, first presented in Shkolnik et al. 2005 remains viable. This work furthers the characterization of SPI, improving its potential as a probe of extrasolar planetary magnetic fields. Subject headings: stars: late-type, activity, chromospheres, planetary systems, radiation mechanism: non-thermal, stars: individual: τ Boo, HD 179949, HD 209458, HD 189733, HD 217107, HD 149143 1. Introduction Observations and theory demonstrate that star-planet interaction (SPI) is a complex, yet potentially very informative probe of extrasolar planetary magnetic fields. In Shkolnik et al. (2003, 2005a), we reported on planet-induced chromospheric activity on two stars, HD 179949 and υ And apparent from the night-to-night modulation of the Ca II H & K chromospheric emission phased with the hot Jupiter’s orbit. The modulation was indicative of a magnetic rather than tidal interaction (Cuntz et al. 2000), such that the period of the observed stellar activity correlated with the planet’s orbital period Porb, rather than Porb/2. Ample observational evidence of tidal and magnetic interactions exists in the exaggerated case of the RS Canum Venaticorum (RS CVn) stars, which are tightly-orbiting binary sys- tems consisting of two chromospherically active late-type stars (e.g. Glebocki et al. 1986, –3– Catalano et al. 1996, Shkolnik et al. 2005b ). Although efforts to observe variable radio emission from the stars with hot Jupiters have not yet been successful (e.g. Lazio & Farrell 2007, George & Stevens 2007), there have been several additional observations that support the existence of SPI. Photometric observations by the MOST space telescope of several hot-Jupiter systems, including HD 179949 and τ Boo, suggest that stellar surface activity in the form of active spots may be induced by the giant planet (Walker et al. 2006, 2007). Also, Saar et al. (2006) recently reported a possible detection of planet-induced X-ray emission from the HD 179949 system corresponding to ∼30% increase in X-ray flux over quiescent levels coincident with the phase of the Ca II enhancements at φorb∼0.8. A statistical analysis by Kashyap et al. (2006) suggests that the X-ray flux from stars with hot Jupiters is on average & 3 times greater than stars with planets at larger orbital distances, presenting further evidence that close-in giant planets have a measurable effect on the activity of the parent star. One scenario of magnetospheric interaction proposes that the planet induces reconnec- tion events as it travels through the large stellar magnetic loops (Cuntz et al. 2000, Ip et al. 2004), implying that the resulting activity should depend on the star’s magnetic field, the planet’s magnetic field and the orbital distance with respect to the Alfv´en radius of the host star (∼10 stellar radii). Novel research of the magnetic field topology of hot Jupiter host stars is underway (Catala et al. 2007, Moutou et al. 2007) using Zeeman Doppler Imaging (ZDI), which hopes to contribute to a more detailed understanding of SPI. A detection of a magnetic field of a hot Jupiter would 1) provide a constraint on the rapid hydrodynamic escape of its atmosphere (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2003, 2004) which could affect the planet’s structure and evolution, 2) present implications for the planet’s internal structure, and 3) shed light on the mass-radius relationship of the known transiting planets (Pont et al. 2005, Bakos et al. 2006). Although the internal magnetic fields of hot Jupiters are expected to be weaker than Jupiter’s due to probable tidal locking and slower spin rates (Sanchez-Lavega 2004, Griessmeier et al. 2004), Olson & Christensen (2006) calculated that the magnetic field of a planet with even a tenth of Jupiter’s rotation rate would still have a strong dipole moment, when reasonably assuming that the convection is not highly modified by the rotation rate. Also, the fact that both hot and very hot Jupiters, such as HD 209458 b and OGLE-TR-56 b, are detected at all means that they must have strong enough magnetic fields to balance the extreme stellar irradiation and CME plasma pressure to prevent destructive atmospheric erosion (Khodachenko et al. 2007). We seek to probe hot Jupiter magnetic fields in order to understand their formation and evolution. SPI potentially offers an indirect way to detect, and with future modeling and observations, measure planetary magnetic fields. –4– It is reasonable to assume that any magnetic interaction would be greatest in the out- ermost layers of the star, namely the chromosphere, transition region and the corona due to their proximity to the planet, low density, and non-radiative heat sources. With the commis- sioning of CFHT’s high-resolution ´echelle spectrograph, ESPaDoNS, we are able to include several stellar activity indicators in our analysis to observe the interaction as a function of atmospheric height in order to model the energy transfer and dissipation mechanisms of this phenomenon. ESPaDOnS’ wavelength coverage allows simultaneous monitoring of the Ca II infrared triplet (IRT, lower chromosphere), Hα, Ca II H, K (middle chromosphere), and He I D3 (upper chromosphere). Our program stars have planets with orbital periods between 2.2 and 7.1 days, eccentric- ities ≈ 0 and semi-major axes < 0.08 AU. These systems offer the best chance of observing upper atmospheric heating. Of the seven systems we observed with ESPaDoNS, τ Boo, HD 179949, υ And and HD 209458 have been observed previously in our CFHT/Gecko campaign. The first results from 2001 and 2002 observations, including the first evidence of planet-induced magnetic heating of HD 179949, were published in Shkolnik et al. (2003, 2005a). We later extended the experiment at the Very Large Telescope (VLT) to include five southern targets. The three new systems monitored in this study are HD 217107, HD 149143 and HD 189733. The system parameters for the ESPaDOnS program stars are listed in Table 1 along with our standard 61 Vir. In this paper, we present new ´echelle spectra and compare with those of previous years, bringing to light a broader understanding of stellar activity, its cycles, and SPI. The details of our observations and data reduction are outlined in Section 2. In Section 3 we discuss our analysis and results of the Ca II K measurements including long-term, short-term and rotational modulation. Comparisons with other activity indicators are made in Section 4. –5– Table 1. Stellar and Orbital Parameters a a a b ′ c d Star SpT vsini Prot Porb Mpsini a hKi hK i hMADKi He I EW −1 (km s ) (days) (days) (MJ ) (AU) (A)˚ (A)˚ (A)˚ (mA)˚ τ Boo F7IV 14.8±0.3 3.2e 3.31 4.4 0.046 0.336 0.184 0.0019 27 HD179949 F8V 6.3±0.9 7f 3.09 0.98 0.045 0.369 0.186 0.0022j 17 HD209458 G0V 4.2±0.5 16g 3.53 0.69h 0.045 0.195 0.078 0.0009 .3 υ And F7 V 9.0±0.4 12e,k 4.618 0.71 0.059 0.254 0.091 0.0016 – HD189733 K1V 2.92±0.22 11.7i 2.22 1.15h 0.031 1.337 1.231 0.0044j 35 HD217107 G8IV 9.0±0.4 39k 7.13 1.35 0.075 0.160 0.075 0.0007 <4 HD149143 G0IV 3.9±1 ?? 4.09 1.36 0.052r 0.342 0.144 0.0014 10 61 Vir G5 V 2.2m 33k — — — 0.182 0.083 0.0008 <4 aPublished orbital solutions: τ Boo − Butler et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • The CORALIE Survey for Southern Extra-Solar Planets. X. a Hot Jupiter
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. ms3857 October 30, 2018 (DOI: will be inserted by hand later) The CORALIE survey for southern extra-solar planets. X. A Hot Jupiter orbiting HD73256⋆ S. Udry1, M. Mayor1, J.V. Clausen2, L.M. Freyhammer3, B.E. Helt2, C. Lovis1, D. Naef1, E.H. Olsen2, F. Pepe1, D. Queloz1, and N.C. Santos1,4 1 Observatoire de Gen`eve, 51 ch. des Maillettes, CH-1290 Sauverny, Switzerland 2 Niels Bohr Institute for Astronomy, Physics and Geophysics; Astronomical Observatory, Juliane Maries Vej 30, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark 3 Royal Observatory of Belgium, Ringlaan 3, 1180 Brussel and University of Brussels (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium 4 Centro de Astronomia e Astrof´ısica da Universidade de Lisboa, Observat´orio Astron´omico de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-018 Lisboa, Portugal Received / Accepted Abstract. Recent radial-velocity measurements obtained with the CORALIE spectrograph on the 1.2-m Euler Swiss telescope at La Silla unveil the presence of a new Jovian-mass Hot Jupiter around HD 73256. The 1.85- MJup planet moves on an extremely short-period (P = 2.5486 d), quasi-circular orbit. The best Keplerian orbital solution is presented together with an unsuccessful photometric planetary-transit search performed with the SAT Danish telescope at La Silla. Over the time span of the observations, the photometric follow-up of the candidate has nevertheless revealed a P ≃ 14-d photometric periodicity corresponding to the rotational period of the star. This variation as well as the radial-velocity jitter around the Keplerian solution are shown to be related to the fair activity level known for HD 73256.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet.Eu Catalog Page 1 # Name Mass Star Name
    exoplanet.eu_catalog # name mass star_name star_distance star_mass OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L b 13.6 OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L 4500.0 0.048 11 Com b 19.4 11 Com 110.6 2.7 11 Oph b 21 11 Oph 145.0 0.0162 11 UMi b 10.5 11 UMi 119.5 1.8 14 And b 5.33 14 And 76.4 2.2 14 Her b 4.64 14 Her 18.1 0.9 16 Cyg B b 1.68 16 Cyg B 21.4 1.01 18 Del b 10.3 18 Del 73.1 2.3 1RXS 1609 b 14 1RXS1609 145.0 0.73 1SWASP J1407 b 20 1SWASP J1407 133.0 0.9 24 Sex b 1.99 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 24 Sex c 0.86 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 2M 0103-55 (AB) b 13 2M 0103-55 (AB) 47.2 0.4 2M 0122-24 b 20 2M 0122-24 36.0 0.4 2M 0219-39 b 13.9 2M 0219-39 39.4 0.11 2M 0441+23 b 7.5 2M 0441+23 140.0 0.02 2M 0746+20 b 30 2M 0746+20 12.2 0.12 2M 1207-39 24 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1207-39 b 4 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1938+46 b 1.9 2M 1938+46 0.6 2M 2140+16 b 20 2M 2140+16 25.0 0.08 2M 2206-20 b 30 2M 2206-20 26.7 0.13 2M 2236+4751 b 12.5 2M 2236+4751 63.0 0.6 2M J2126-81 b 13.3 TYC 9486-927-1 24.8 0.4 2MASS J11193254 AB 3.7 2MASS J11193254 AB 2MASS J1450-7841 A 40 2MASS J1450-7841 A 75.0 0.04 2MASS J1450-7841 B 40 2MASS J1450-7841 B 75.0 0.04 2MASS J2250+2325 b 30 2MASS J2250+2325 41.5 30 Ari B b 9.88 30 Ari B 39.4 1.22 38 Vir b 4.51 38 Vir 1.18 4 Uma b 7.1 4 Uma 78.5 1.234 42 Dra b 3.88 42 Dra 97.3 0.98 47 Uma b 2.53 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma c 0.54 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma d 1.64 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 51 Eri b 9.1 51 Eri 29.4 1.75 51 Peg b 0.47 51 Peg 14.7 1.11 55 Cnc b 0.84 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc c 0.1784 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc d 3.86 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc e 0.02547 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc f 0.1479 55
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet.Eu Catalog Page 1 Star Distance Star Name Star Mass
    exoplanet.eu_catalog star_distance star_name star_mass Planet name mass 1.3 Proxima Centauri 0.120 Proxima Cen b 0.004 1.3 alpha Cen B 0.934 alf Cen B b 0.004 2.3 WISE 0855-0714 WISE 0855-0714 6.000 2.6 Lalande 21185 0.460 Lalande 21185 b 0.012 3.2 eps Eridani 0.830 eps Eridani b 3.090 3.4 Ross 128 0.168 Ross 128 b 0.004 3.6 GJ 15 A 0.375 GJ 15 A b 0.017 3.6 YZ Cet 0.130 YZ Cet d 0.004 3.6 YZ Cet 0.130 YZ Cet c 0.003 3.6 YZ Cet 0.130 YZ Cet b 0.002 3.6 eps Ind A 0.762 eps Ind A b 2.710 3.7 tau Cet 0.783 tau Cet e 0.012 3.7 tau Cet 0.783 tau Cet f 0.012 3.7 tau Cet 0.783 tau Cet h 0.006 3.7 tau Cet 0.783 tau Cet g 0.006 3.8 GJ 273 0.290 GJ 273 b 0.009 3.8 GJ 273 0.290 GJ 273 c 0.004 3.9 Kapteyn's 0.281 Kapteyn's c 0.022 3.9 Kapteyn's 0.281 Kapteyn's b 0.015 4.3 Wolf 1061 0.250 Wolf 1061 d 0.024 4.3 Wolf 1061 0.250 Wolf 1061 c 0.011 4.3 Wolf 1061 0.250 Wolf 1061 b 0.006 4.5 GJ 687 0.413 GJ 687 b 0.058 4.5 GJ 674 0.350 GJ 674 b 0.040 4.7 GJ 876 0.334 GJ 876 b 1.938 4.7 GJ 876 0.334 GJ 876 c 0.856 4.7 GJ 876 0.334 GJ 876 e 0.045 4.7 GJ 876 0.334 GJ 876 d 0.022 4.9 GJ 832 0.450 GJ 832 b 0.689 4.9 GJ 832 0.450 GJ 832 c 0.016 5.9 GJ 570 ABC 0.802 GJ 570 D 42.500 6.0 SIMP0136+0933 SIMP0136+0933 12.700 6.1 HD 20794 0.813 HD 20794 e 0.015 6.1 HD 20794 0.813 HD 20794 d 0.011 6.1 HD 20794 0.813 HD 20794 b 0.009 6.2 GJ 581 0.310 GJ 581 b 0.050 6.2 GJ 581 0.310 GJ 581 c 0.017 6.2 GJ 581 0.310 GJ 581 e 0.006 6.5 GJ 625 0.300 GJ 625 b 0.010 6.6 HD 219134 HD 219134 h 0.280 6.6 HD 219134 HD 219134 e 0.200 6.6 HD 219134 HD 219134 d 0.067 6.6 HD 219134 HD
    [Show full text]
  • • August the 26Th 2004 Detection of the Radial-Velocity Signal Induced by OGLE-TR-111 B Using UVES/FLAMES on the VLT (See Pont Et Al
    2004 • August the 26th 2004 Detection of the radial-velocity signal induced by OGLE-TR-111 b using UVES/FLAMES on the VLT (see Pont et al. 2004, A&A in press, astro-ph/0408499). • August the 25th 2004 TrES-1b: A new transiting exoplanet detected by the Trans-Atlantic Exoplanet Survey (TreS) team . (see Boulder Press release or Alonso et al.) • August the 25th 2004 HD 160691 c : A 14 Earth-mass planet detected with HARPS (see ESO Press Release or Santos et al.) • July the 8th 2004 HD 37605 b: The first extra-solar planet detected with HRS on the Hobby- Eberly Telescope (Cochran et al.) • May the 3rd 2004 HD 219452 Bb withdrawn by Desidera et al. • April the 28th 2004 Orbital solution for OGLE-TR-113 confirmed by Konacki et al • April the 15th 2004 OGLE 2003-BLG-235/MOA 2003-BLG-53: a planetary microlensing event (Bond et al.) • April the 14th 2004 FLAMES-UVES spectroscopic orbits for two OGLE III transiting candidates: OGLE-TR-113 and OGLE-TR-132 (Bouchy et al.) • February 2004 Detection of Carbon and Oxygen in the evaporating atmosphere of HD 209458 b by A. Vidal-Madjar et al. (from HST observations). • January the 5th 2004 Two planets orbiting giant stars announced by Mitchell et al. during the AAS meeting: HD 59686 b and 91 Aqr b (HD 219499 b). Two other more massive companions, Tau Gem b (HD 54719 b) and nu Oph b (HD 163917 b), have also been announced by the same authors. 2003 • December 2003 First planet detected with HARPS: HD 330075 b (see Mayor et al., in the ESO Messenger No 114) • July the 3rd 2003 A long-period planet on a circular orbit around HD 70642 announced by the AAT team (Carter et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the True Mass of Radial-Velocity Exoplanets with Gaia 9 Planet Candidates in the Brown-Dwarf/Stellar Regime and 27 Confirmed Planets
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. exoplanet_mass_gaia c ESO 2020 September 30, 2020 Determining the true mass of radial-velocity exoplanets with Gaia 9 planet candidates in the brown-dwarf/stellar regime and 27 confirmed planets F. Kiefer1; 2, G. Hébrard1; 3, A. Lecavelier des Etangs1, E. Martioli1; 4, S. Dalal1, and A. Vidal-Madjar1 1 Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, UMR 7095, 98 bis bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France 2 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France? 3 Observatoire de Haute-Provence, CNRS, Universiteé d’Aix-Marseille, 04870 Saint-Michel-l’Observatoire, France 4 Laboratório Nacional de Astrofísica, Rua Estados Unidos 154, 37504-364, Itajubá - MG, Brazil Submitted on 2020/08/20 ; Accepted for publication on 2020/09/24 ABSTRACT Mass is one of the most important parameters for determining the true nature of an astronomical object. Yet, many published exoplan- ets lack a measurement of their true mass, in particular those detected thanks to radial velocity (RV) variations of their host star. For those, only the minimum mass, or m sin i, is known, owing to the insensitivity of RVs to the inclination of the detected orbit compared to the plane-of-the-sky. The mass that is given in database is generally that of an assumed edge-on system (∼90◦), but many other inclinations are possible, even extreme values closer to 0◦ (face-on). In such case, the mass of the published object could be strongly underestimated by up to two orders of magnitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Enhanced Chromospheric Ca II H and K Emission in Stars with Close-In Extrasolar Planets
    A&A 540, A82 (2012) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118247 & c ESO 2012 Astrophysics Evidence for enhanced chromospheric Ca II H and K emission in stars with close-in extrasolar planets T. Krejcovᡠ1 and J. Budaj2 1 Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Masaryk University, Kotlárskᡠ2, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic e-mail: [email protected] 2 Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 05960 Tatranská Lomnica, Slovak Republic e-mail: [email protected] Received 11 October 2011 / Accepted 13 February 2012 ABSTRACT Context. The planet-star interaction is manifested in many ways. It has been found that a close-in exoplanet causes small but mea- surable variability in the cores of a few lines in the spectra of several stars, which corresponds to the orbital period of the exoplanet. Stars with and without exoplanets may have different properties. Aims. The main goal of our study is to search for the influence that exoplanets might have on atmospheres of their host stars. Unlike the previous studies, we do not study changes in the spectrum of a host star or differences between stars with and without exoplanets. We aim to study a large number of stars with exoplanets and the current level of their chromospheric activity and to look for a possible correlation with the exoplanetary properties. Methods. To analyse the chromospheric activity of stars, we exploited our own and publicly available archival spectra, measured the equivalent widths of the cores of Ca II H and K lines, and used them to trace their activity. Subsequently, we searched for their dependence on the orbital parameters and the mass of the exoplanet.
    [Show full text]
  • Radial Velocities from the N2K Project: 6 New Cold Gas Giant Planets Orbiting HD 55696, HD 98736, HD 148164, HD 203473, and HD 211810 Kristo Ment,1, 2 Debra A
    Draft version September 6, 2018 Typeset using LATEX preprint style in AASTeX62 Radial velocities from the N2K Project: 6 new cold gas giant planets orbiting HD 55696, HD 98736, HD 148164, HD 203473, and HD 211810 Kristo Ment,1, 2 Debra A. Fischer,1 Gaspar Bakos,3 Andrew W. Howard,4 and Howard Isaacson5 1Department of Astronomy, Yale University, 52 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, USA 2Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 3Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, NJ 08544, USA 4Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 5Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA (Received February 15, 2018; Revised August 23, 2018; Accepted August 29, 2018) Submitted to AJ ABSTRACT The N2K planet search program was designed to exploit the planet-metallicity cor- relation by searching for gas giant planets orbiting metal-rich stars. Here, we present the radial velocity measurements for 378 N2K target stars that were observed with the HIRES spectrograph at Keck Observatory between 2004 and 2017. With this data set, we announce the discovery of six new gas giant exoplanets: a double-planet system or- biting HD 148164 (M sin i of 1.23 and 5.16 MJUP) and single planet detections around HD 55696 (M sin i = 3.87 MJUP), HD 98736 (M sin i= 2.33 MJUP), HD 203473 (M sin i = 7.8 MJUP), and HD 211810 (M sin i = 0.67 MJUP). These gas giant companions have orbital semi-major axes between 1.0 and 6.2 AU and eccentricities ranging from 0.13 to 0.71.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar System Analogues Among Exoplanetary Systems
    Solar System analogues among exoplanetary systems Maria Lomaeva Lund Observatory Lund University ´´ 2016-EXA105 Degree project of 15 higher education credits June 2016 Supervisor: Piero Ranalli Lund Observatory Box 43 SE-221 00 Lund Sweden Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning Människans intresse för rymden har alltid varit stort. Man har antagit att andra plan- etsystem, om de existerar, ser ut som vårt: med mindre stenplaneter i banor närmast stjärnan och gas- samt isjättar i de yttre banorna. Idag känner man till drygt 2 000 exoplaneter, d.v.s., planeter som kretsar kring andra stjärnor än solen. Man vet även att vissa av dem saknar motsvarighet i solsystemet, t. ex., heta jupitrar (gasjättar som har migrerat inåt och kretsar väldigt nära stjärnan) och superjordar (stenplaneter större än jorden). Därför blir frågan om hur unikt solsystemet är ännu mer intressant, vilket vi försöker ta reda på i det här projektet. Det finns olika sätt att detektera exoplaneter på men två av dem har gett flest resultat: transitmetoden och dopplerspektroskopin. Med transitmetoden mäter man minsknin- gen av en stjärnas ljus när en planet passerar framför den. Den metoden passar bäst för stora planeter med små omloppsbanor. Dopplerspektroskopin använder sig av Doppler effekten som innebär att ljuset utsänt från en stjärna verkar blåare respektive rödare när en stjärna förflyttar sig fram och tillbaka från observatören. Denna rörelse avslöjar att det finns en planet som kretsar kring stjärnan och påverkar den med sin gravita- tion. Dopplerspektroskopin är lämpligast för massiva planeter med små omloppsbanor. Under projektets gång har vi inte bara letat efter solsystemets motsvarigheter utan även studerat planetsystem som är annorlunda.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1207.6212V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 1 Aug 2012
    Draft: Submitted to ApJ Supp. A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 PRECISE RADIAL VELOCITIES OF 2046 NEARBY FGKM STARS AND 131 STANDARDS1 Carly Chubak2, Geoffrey W. Marcy2, Debra A. Fischer5, Andrew W. Howard2,3, Howard Isaacson2, John Asher Johnson4, Jason T. Wright6,7 (Received; Accepted) Draft: Submitted to ApJ Supp. ABSTRACT We present radial velocities with an accuracy of 0.1 km s−1 for 2046 stars of spectral type F,G,K, and M, based on ∼29000 spectra taken with the Keck I telescope. We also present 131 FGKM standard stars, all of which exhibit constant radial velocity for at least 10 years, with an RMS less than 0.03 km s−1. All velocities are measured relative to the solar system barycenter. Spectra of the Sun and of asteroids pin the zero-point of our velocities, yielding a velocity accuracy of 0.01 km s−1for G2V stars. This velocity zero-point agrees within 0.01 km s−1 with the zero-points carefully determined by Nidever et al. (2002) and Latham et al. (2002). For reference we compute the differences in velocity zero-points between our velocities and standard stars of the IAU, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and l’Observatoire de Geneve, finding agreement with all of them at the level of 0.1 km s−1. But our radial velocities (and those of all other groups) contain no corrections for convective blueshift or gravitational redshifts (except for G2V stars), leaving them vulnerable to systematic errors of ∼0.2 km s−1 for K dwarfs and ∼0.3 km s−1 for M dwarfs due to subphotospheric convection, for which we offer velocity corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Age Consistency Between Exoplanet Hosts and Field Stars
    A&A 585, A5 (2016) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527297 & c ESO 2015 Astrophysics Age consistency between exoplanet hosts and field stars A. Bonfanti1;2, S. Ortolani1;2, and V. Nascimbeni2 1 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università degli Studi di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 3, 35122 Padova, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 2 Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, INAF, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy Received 2 September 2015 / Accepted 3 November 2015 ABSTRACT Context. Transiting planets around stars are discovered mostly through photometric surveys. Unlike radial velocity surveys, photo- metric surveys do not tend to target slow rotators, inactive or metal-rich stars. Nevertheless, we suspect that observational biases could also impact transiting-planet hosts. Aims. This paper aims to evaluate how selection effects reflect on the evolutionary stage of both a limited sample of transiting-planet host stars (TPH) and a wider sample of planet-hosting stars detected through radial velocity analysis. Then, thanks to uniform deriva- tion of stellar ages, a homogeneous comparison between exoplanet hosts and field star age distributions is developed. Methods. Stellar parameters have been computed through our custom-developed isochrone placement algorithm, according to Padova evolutionary models. The notable aspects of our algorithm include the treatment of element diffusion, activity checks in terms of 0 log RHK and v sin i, and the evaluation of the stellar evolutionary speed in the Hertzsprung-Russel diagram in order to better constrain age. Working with TPH, the observational stellar mean density ρ? allows us to compute stellar luminosity even if the distance is not available, by combining ρ? with the spectroscopic log g.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Environment Surrounding Close-In Exoplanets
    MNRAS 449, 4117–4130 (2015) doi:10.1093/mnras/stv618 On the environment surrounding close-in exoplanets A. A. Vidotto,1‹ R. Fares,2 M. Jardine,2 C. Moutou3,4 and J.-F. Donati5 1Observatoire de Geneve,` UniversitedeGen´ eve,` Chemin des Maillettes 51, CH-1290 Versoix, Switzerland 2SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9SS, UK 3Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Corporation, CNRS, 65-1238 Mamalahoa Hwy, Kamuela, HI 96743, USA 4Aix Marseille Universite,´ CNRS, LAM (Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille) UMR 7326, F-13388 Marseille, France 5LATT-UMR 5572, CNRS and Univ. P. Sabatier, 14 Av. E. Belin, F-31400 Toulouse, France Accepted 2015 March 17. Received 2015 February 18; in original form 2014 November 28 Downloaded from ABSTRACT Exoplanets in extremely close-in orbits are immersed in a local interplanetary medium (i.e. the stellar wind) much denser than the local conditions encountered around the Solar system plan- ets. The environment surrounding these exoplanets also differs in terms of dynamics (slower stellar winds, but higher Keplerian velocities) and ambient magnetic fields (likely higher for http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/ host stars more active than the Sun). Here, we quantitatively investigate the nature of the interplanetary media surrounding the hot Jupiters HD 46375b, HD 73256b, HD 102195b, HD 130322b and HD 179949b. We simulate the three-dimensional winds of their host stars, in which we directly incorporate their observed surface magnetic fields. With that, we derive mass-loss rates (1.9–8.0 × 10−13 M yr−1) and the wind properties at the position of the hot Jupiters’ orbits (temperature, velocity, magnetic field intensity and pressure).
    [Show full text]