DOCSLIB.ORG

The Human Rights Watch the Human Rights Watch Global Report On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH GLOBAL REPORT ON PRISONS PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED REPORTS FROM THE HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH PRISON PROJECT Prison Conditions in Brazil Prison Conditions in Czechoslovakia Prison Conditions in Czechoslovakia: An Update Prison Conditions in Egypt Prison Conditions in India Prison Conditions in Indonesia Prison Conditions in Israel & the Israeli-Occupied West Bank & Gaza Strip Prison Conditions in Jamaica Prison Conditions in Mexico Prison Conditions in Poland Prison Conditions in Poland: An Update Prison Conditions in Puerto Rico Prison Conditions in Romania Prison Conditions in Spain Prison Conditions in Turkey Prison Conditions in the United Kingdom Prison Conditions in the United States Prison Conditions in the Soviet Union THE HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH GLOBAL REPORT ON PRISONS Human Rights Watch New York !!! Washington !!! Los Angeles !!! London Copyright 8 June 1993 by Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card No.: 93 78608 ISBN 1-56432-101-0 Cover design by Robert Kimzey. The Prison Project The Prison Project, established in 1988, cuts across the five regional divisions of Human Rights Watch to focus on a single issue: prison conditions worldwide. The Prison Project has investigated conditions for sentenced prisoners, pre-trial detainees and those held in police lockups. It examines prison conditions for all prisoners, not just political prisoners. The work of the Prison Project is guided by the Prison Advisory Committee, whose chairman is Herman Schwartz. Other members are Nan Aron, Vivian Berger, Haywood Burns, Alejandro Garro, William Hellerstein, Edward Koren, Sheldon Krantz, Benjamin Malcolm, Diane Orentlicher, Norman Rosenberg, David Rothman and Clarence Sundram. The director of the Project is Joanna Weschler. Anthony Levintow is the associate. For a catalog of publications, please call (212) 986-1980. HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Human Rights Watch conducts regular, systematic investigations of human rights abuses in some sixty countries around the world. It addresses the human rights practices of governments of all political stripes, of all geopolitical alignments, and of all ethnic and religious persuasions. In internal wars it documents violations by both governments and rebel groups. Human Rights Watch defends freedom of thought and expression, due process of law and equal protection of the law; it documents and denounces murders, disappearances, torture, arbitrary imprisonment, exile, censorship and other abuses of internationally recognized human rights. Human Rights Watch began in 1978 with the founding of Helsinki Watch by a group of publishers, lawyers and other activists and now maintains offices in New York, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, London, Moscow, Belgrade, Bucharest and Hong Kong. Today, it includes Africa Watch, Americas Watch, Asia Watch, Helsinki Watch, Middle East Watch, the Fund for Free Expression and three collaborative projects, the Arms Project, Prison Project and Women's Rights Project. Human Rights Watch is an independent, nongovernmental organization, supported by contributions from private individuals and foundations. It accepts no government funds, directly or indirectly. The executive committee includes Robert L. Bernstein, chair; Adrian W. DeWind, vice chair; Roland Algrant, Lisa Anderson, Peter D. Bell, Alice Brown, William Carmichael, Dorothy Cullman, Irene Diamond, Jonathan Fanton, Jack Greenberg, Alice H. Henkin, Stephen L. Kass, Marina Pinto Kaufman, Alexander MacGregor, Bruce Rabb, Orville Schell, Gary Sick, Malcolm Smith and Robert Wedgeworth. The staff includes Kenneth Roth, acting executive director; Holly J. Burkhalter, Washington director; Gara LaMarche, associate director; Ellen Lutz, California director; Susan Osnos, press director; Jemera Rone, counsel; Michal Longfelder, Development director; Allyson Collins, research associate; Joanna Weschler, Prison Project director; Kenneth Anderson, Arms Project director; and Dorothy Q. Thomas, Women's Rights Project director. The executive directors of the divisions of Human Rights Watch are Abdullahi An-Na'im, Africa Watch; Juan E. Méndez, Americas Watch; Sidney Jones, Asia Watch; Jeri Laber, Helsinki Watch; Andrew Whitley, Middle East Watch; and Gara LaMarche, the Fund for Free Expression. Addresses for Human Rights Watch 485 Fifth Avenue 1522 K Street, N.W., #910 New York, NY 10017-6104 Washington, DC 20005 Tel: (212) 972-8400 Tel: (202) 371-6592 Fax: (212) 972-0905 Fax: (202) 371-0124 10951 West Pico Blvd., #203 90 Borough High Street Los Angeles, CA 90064 London, UK SE1 1LL Tel: (310) 475-3070 Tel: (071) 378-8008 Fax: (310) 475-5613 Fax: (071) 378-8029 CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix Preface xi Introduction xv Summary of Findings and Recommendations xxi Conditions 1. Pre-Trial Detention 3 2. Physical Circumstances 9 3. Food 18 4. A Note on Medical Care 21 Inmates 5. Classification 27 6. Women 34 7. Master/Servant Relationships 41 8. Death Row 47 Daily Routine 9. Activities 53 10. Work 57 Rule and Misrule 11. Rules 65 12. Discipline 69 13. Beatings and Restraints 85 14. After a Riot 93 Isolation and Transparency 15. Contacts with Outsiders 101 16. Nongovernmental Monitors 109 17. The United Nations 115 The Numbers 125 Country Sections Brazil 131 China 137 Cuba 151 Egypt 161 India 167 Indonesia 173 Israel and the Occupied Territories 180 Jamaica 188 Mexico 193 Peru 198 Poland 208 Romania 212 Russia and Azerbaijan 217 South Africa 226 Spain 232 Turkey 237 United Kingdom 241 United States 247 Zaire 253 Appendices A. The Prison Project Advisory Committee 263 B. The International Covenant on Civil 264 and Political Rights (Articles 7 and 10) C. The Standard Minimum Rules for the 265 Treatment of Prisoners D. The Human Rights Watch Questionnaire 291 for Prison Visits Bibliography 299 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Joanna Weschler, the director of the Prison Project of Human Rights Watch is the principal author of this report, and Aryeh Neier, the former executive director of Human Rights Watch, its editor. The introduction and preface were written by Herman Schwartz, the chair of the Prison Project's Advisory Committee; sections were also contributed by David Rosenberg, a lawyer and consultant with Human Rights Watch. The following staff members and consultants for Human Rights Watch wrote or researched the country chapters: Mary Jane Camejo, Holly Cartner, Allyson Collins, Erika Dailey, Rachel Denber, Timothy Gellat, Eric Goldstein, Patricia Gossman, Sidney Jones, Robin Kirk, Lydia Lobenthal, Ellen Lutz, Bronwen Manby, Anne Manuel, Juan Méndez, Aryeh Neier, Benjamin Penglase, Alexander Petrov, Luis Felipe Polo, David Rosenberg, Peter Rosenblum, Virginia Sherry, Mickey Spiegel, Joanna Weschler, and Lois Whitman. The authors were assisted and guided in their work by a group of advisers comprising staff and board members of Human Rights Watch and prison specialists. They were: Alice Brown, Eric Goldstein, William Hellerstein, Gara La Marche, Judge Morris Lasker, Kenneth Roth, David Rothman, Kenneth Schoen, Herman Schwartz, Andrew Whitley and Lois Whitman. Dr. Herbert F. Spirer and Dr. Marilyn Duecker of the American Statistical Association's Committee on Scientific Feedom and Human Rights helped with interpreting statistical data. The report was copyedited and designed by Robert Kimzey. Anthony Levintow provided production assistance. ix x PREFACE The Human Rights Watch Global Report on Prisons summarizes six years of work by the Prison Project and divisions of Human Rights Watch in investigating prison conditions in some twenty countries worldwide. The project was established in 1987 to focus attention on the circumstances in which all prisonersCnot only those accused of politically- motivated offensesCare incarcerated; and to put these problems on the world's human rights agenda. At the request of Human Rights Watch Executive Director Aryeh Neier, Professor Herman Schwartz of the American University in Washington, D.C., a pioneer in litigation securing rights for prisoners in the United States, undertook investigations of prison conditions in Poland and Czechoslovakia in 1987 and 1988 respectively. At the time, neither country permitted access to its prisons. Nevertheless, we were able to gather sufficient information to publish detailed, comprehensive and, we believe, reliable reports. In an attempt to extend our efforts to other parts of the world, Human Rights Watch assembled an advisory committee of prison experts whose names appear in an appendix to this report. Working with the staff of the regional divisions of Human Rights WatchCAfrica Watch, Americas Watch, Asia Watch, Helsinki Watch and Middle East WatchCthe project launched investigations of prisons and jails in selected countries around the world. An indispensable three- year grant from the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation supported the work of the project. In 1990, Joanna Weschler of the staff of Human Rights Watch, succeeded Professor Schwartz as director of the Prison Project and Professor Schwartz became Chairman of the Advisory Committee. Ms. Weschler is the principal author of this report. Our investigations covered North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa and the six largest countries in the world, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Russia, and the United States. The other prison systems we investigated were those of Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Egypt, Israel and the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip, Mexico, Jamaica, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and
Recommended publications
  • The Human Factor in Prison Design: Contrasting Prison Architecture in the United States and Scandinavia

    The Human Factor in Prison Design: Contrasting Prison Architecture in the United States and Scandinavia

    The Human Factor in Prison Design: Contrasting Prison Architecture in the United States and Scandinavia Prison design is a controversial topic in the field of architecture. The “all- seeing” Panopticon prison of the eighteenth century introduced by British social reformer Jeremy Bentham brought academic attention to the issue of prison design. Two centuries later, French philosopher and social theorist Michel Foucault used the Panopticon as a metaphor for society and its power to control beyond the physical. MEGAN FOWLER In the United States, there are two penal and prison systems -- the Pennsylvania Iowa State University System and the Auburn System. The Pennsylvania penitentiary system was influ- enced by the idea of penitence; solitude was thought to serve as punishment as well as giving time for reflection and contrition. The prison designs often recall the Panopticon with centralized configurations. The opposing system is known as the Auburn System, after the eponymous facility in New York, where impris- onment was punishment instead of a chance for reformation. It was at Auburn where the core idea of total surveillance from Bentham’s Panopticon became a reality. The Auburn system and corresponding architecture have been described as “machine-like” where prisoners are kept in tiny cells under total control. Since the 19th century, the Auburn System has predominated prison design and theory in the United States.1 In American society today some resist involving architects in creating prison facilities. “Architecture” for these buildings is discouraged.2 The environments in American prisons create opportunities for violence, tension, and hostility in inmates.3 Even employees in American prisons have been found to have a higher risk of various stress-related health issues.4 In 2013, Pelican Bay super- max prison, with its “8x10-foot, soundproof, poured-concrete cells with remote controlled doors and no windows,” provoked hunger strikes across California in solidarity for the appalling living conditions.
  • Stuart Christie Obituary | Politics | the Guardian

    Stuart Christie Obituary | Politics | the Guardian

    8/29/2020 Stuart Christie obituary | Politics | The Guardian Stuart Christie obituary Anarchist who was jailed in Spain for an attempt to assassinate Franco and later acquitted of being a member of the Angry Brigade Duncan Campbell Mon 17 Aug 2020 10.40 BST In 1964 a dashing, long-haired 18-year-old British anarchist, Stuart Christie, faced the possibility of the death penalty in Madrid for his role in a plot to assassinate General Franco, the Spanish dictator. A man of great charm, warmth and wit, Christie, who has died of cancer aged 74, got away with a 20-year prison sentence and was eventually released after less than four years, only to find himself in prison several years later in Britain after being accused of being a member of the Angry Brigade, a group responsible for a series of explosions in London in the early 1970s. On that occasion he was acquitted, and afterwards he went on to become a leading writer and publisher of anarchist literature, as well as the author of a highly entertaining memoir, Granny Made Me an Anarchist. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/aug/17/stuart-christie-obituary 1/5 8/29/2020 Stuart Christie obituary | Politics | The Guardian Christie’s Franco-related mission was to deliver explosives to Madrid for an attempt to blow up the Spanish leader while he attended a football match at the city’s Bernabéu stadium. Telling his family that he was going grape-picking in France, he went first to Paris, where it turned out that the only French he knew, to the amusement of his anarchist hosts, was “Zut, alors!” There he was given explosives and furnished with instructions on how to make himself known to his contact by wearing a bandage on his hand.
  • Report to the Turkish Government on the Visit to Turkey Carried out by The

    Report to the Turkish Government on the Visit to Turkey Carried out by The

    CPT/Inf (2015) 6 Report to the Turkish Government on the visit to Turkey carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 9 to 21 June 2013 The Turkish Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2015) 7. Strasbourg, 15 January 2015 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report............................................................................4 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................5 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................5 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................6 C. Consultations held by the delegation and co-operation encountered...................................7 D. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .........................7 E. Monitoring of places of deprivation of liberty and complaints bodies.................................8 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ................................9 A. Police custody ............................................................................................................................9 1. Preliminary remarks ..........................................................................................................9
  • “An Open Prison Without End” WATCH Myanmar’S Mass Detention of Rohingya in Rakhine State

    “An Open Prison Without End” WATCH Myanmar’S Mass Detention of Rohingya in Rakhine State

    HUMAN RIGHTS “An Open Prison without End” WATCH Myanmar’s Mass Detention of Rohingya in Rakhine State “An Open Prison without End” Myanmar’s Mass Detention of Rohingya in Rakhine State Copyright © 2020 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-8646 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org OCTOBER 2020 ISBN: 978-1-62313-8646 “An Open Prison without End” Myanmar’s Mass Detention of Rohingya in Rakhine State Maps ................................................................................................................................ i Table .............................................................................................................................. iii Summary ........................................................................................................................
  • Guidelines on Human Rights Education for Health Workers Published by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) Ul

    Guidelines on Human Rights Education for Health Workers Published by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) Ul

    guidelines on human rights education for health workers Published by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) Ul. Miodowa 10 00–251 Warsaw Poland www.osce.org/odihr © OSCE/ODIHR 2013 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for educational and other non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE/ ODIHR as the source. ISBN 978-92-9234-870-0 Designed by Homework, Warsaw, Poland Cover photograph by iStockphoto Printed in Poland by Sungraf Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................ 5 FOreworD ................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ............................................................................................11 Rationale for human rights education for health workers............................. 11 Key definitions for the guidelines .............................................................................14 Process for elaborating the guidelines ................................................................... 15 Anticipated users of the guidelines .......................................................................... 17 Purposes of the guidelines ........................................................................................... 17 Application of the guidelines ......................................................................................18
  • Human Rights International Ngos: a Critical Evaluation

    Human Rights International Ngos: a Critical Evaluation

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Contributions to Books Faculty Scholarship 2001 Human Rights International NGOs: A Critical Evaluation Makau Mutua University at Buffalo School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/book_sections Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Makau Mutua, Human Rights International NGOs: A Critical Evaluation in NGOs and Human Rights: Promise and Performance 151 (Claude E. Welch, Jr., ed., University of Pennsylvania Press 2001) Copyright © 2001 University of pennsylvania Press. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations used for purposes of scholarly citation, none of this work may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission from the publisher. For information address the University of Pennsylvania Press, 3905 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4112. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Contributions to Books by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Chapter 7 Human Rights International NGOs A Critical Evaluation Makau Mutua The human rights movement can be seen in variety of guises. It can be seen as a move­ ment for international justice or as a cultural project for "civilizing savage" cultures.
  • Human Rights Organisations on 5 Continents

    Human Rights Organisations on 5 Continents

    FIDH represents 164 human rights organisations on 5 continents FIDH - International Federation for Human Rights 17, passage de la Main-d’Or - 75011 Paris - France CCP Paris: 76 76 Z Tel: (33-1) 43 55 25 18 / Fax: (33-1) 43 55 18 80 www.fi dh.org ANNUAL REPORT 2011 ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Cover: © AFP/MOHAMMED ABED Egypt, 16 December 2011. 04 Our Fundamentals 06 164 member organisations 07 International Board 08 International Secretariat 10 Priority 1 Protect and support human rights defenders 15 Priority 2 Promote and protect women’s rights 19 Priority 3 Promote and protect migrants’ rights 24 Priority 4 Promote the administration of justice and the i ght against impunity 33 Priority 5 Strengthening respect for human rights in the context of globalisation 38 Priority 6 Mobilising the community of States 43 Priority 7 Support the respect for human rights and the rule of law in conl ict and emergency situations, or during political transition 44 > Asia 49 > Eastern Europe and Central Asia 54 > North Africa and Middle East 59 > Sub-Saharan Africa 64 > The Americas 68 Internal challenges 78 Financial report 2011 79 They support us Our Fundamentals Our mandate: Protect all rights Interaction: Local presence - global action The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) is an As a federal movement, FIDH operates on the basis of interac- international NGO. It defends all human rights - civil, political, tion with its member organisations. It ensures that FIDH merges economic, social and cultural - as contained in the Universal on-the-ground experience and knowledge with expertise in inter- Declaration of Human Rights.
  • The Culture of Democratic Spain and the Issue of Torture

    The Culture of Democratic Spain and the Issue of Torture

    © 8 The Culture of Democratic Spain and the Issue of Torture Luis Martín-Estudillo The issue of torture has been both a problem in terms of human rights and one closely tied to international prestige and cultural polemics for the last four decades in Spain. While denunciations of tortures inflicted on enemies of the Franco regime were an important part of the opposition’s public opinion campaigns during the dictatorship, after the general’s death in 1975 the persistence of tortures practiced by the various police forces became a delicate political question for the newly established parliamentary monarchy. The transition to democracy during the 1970s coincided with two major developments that affected the social perception of torture. One was very visible; it could be summarized as the coming of age of international human rights monitoring. The other went explicably unnoticed, as it had to do with certain “reasons of state” and practices that must remain secret in order to function within their own logic: I am referring to the change in torture practices from “scarring” (those that leave traces on the victim’s body) to “clean” (those which do not) techniques at a global level, as Darius Rejali has documented. In that context, accusations of torture undermined officials’ efforts to promote a “normalized” image of Spain as a “wholly European” (i.e., “civilized”) nation that sought full integration into the group of advanced democracies by leaving behind the repressive policies of the Francoist dictatorship.1 The presence of torture as one of the hot topics in public debate, as it was during the 1970s thanks to the struggle of a minority of opposition politicians and intellectuals, was not compatible with the image that needed to be constructed to achieve identification with the targeted European ideal.
  • REPORTING HUMAN RIGHTS in the PHILIPPINES a Field Guide for Journalists and Media Workers

    REPORTING HUMAN RIGHTS in the PHILIPPINES a Field Guide for Journalists and Media Workers

    REPORTING HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE PHILIPPINES A Field Guide for Journalists and Media Workers Red Batario Main Author and Editor Yvonne T. Chua Luz Rimban Ibarra C. Mateo Writers Rorie Fajardo Project Coordinator Alan Davis Foreword The publication of this guide was made possible with the support of the US Department of State through the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL) Copyright 2009 PHILIPPINE HUMAN RIGHTS REPORTING PROJECT Published by the Philippine Human Rights Reporting Project 4th Floor, FSS Bldg., 89 Scout Castor St., Barangay Laging Handa Quezon City 1103 Philippines All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher. Printed in Quezon City, Philippines National Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Batario, Red Reporting Human Rights in the Philippines: A Field Guide for Journalists and Media Workers TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword .......................................................................8 REPORTING HUMAN RIGHTS AS NEWS .............. 10 Covering and reporting human rights are often reduced to simplistic narratives of the struggle between good and evil that is then set on a stage where dramatic depictions of human despair become a sensational representation of the day’s headlines HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE NEWS MEDIA ............ 19 Why do journalists and the news media need to know human rights? What are human rights? What are ordinary rights? THE NEWS PROCESS............................................ 31 How to explore other ways of covering, developing and reporting human rights for newspapers, television, radio and on-line publications.
  • Dynamics of Collective Action in Turkish Prisons

    Dynamics of Collective Action in Turkish Prisons

    DYNAMICS OF COLLECTIVE ACTION IN TURKISH PRISONS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MAMAK AND DIYARBAKIR PRISONS BETWEEN 1980 AND 1985 by Basak Gemici Ay Bachelor of Arts, Sabancı University, 2012 Master of Arts, Koc University, 2015 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts & Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Pittsburgh 2016 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS & SCIENCES This thesis was presented by Basak Gemici Ay It was defended on April 14th, 2016 and approved by Suzanne Staggenborg, Professor and Department Chair, Sociology Thesis Director: Jackie Smith, Professor, Sociology John Markoff, Distinguished University Professor, Sociology ii Copyright © by Basak Gemici Ay 2016 iii DYNAMICS OF COLLECTIVE ACTION IN TURKISH PRISONS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MAMAK AND DIYARBAKIR PRISONS BETWEEN 1980 AND 1985 Basak Gemici Ay, M.A. University of Pittsburgh, 2016 Historically, one of the most significant periods in which incarceration was used as a tool to manage political opponents of the regime in Turkey was the 1980s, specifically during and after the 1980 military coup. This study investigates the high-risk environments of the two notorious military prisons: Mamak and Diyarbakir Prisons between 1980 and 1985. These two military prisons: Mamak Prison, where Turkish revolutionaries were incarcerated and Diyarbakir Prison, where Kurdish revolutionaries were incarcerated, were infamous for the torture and level of repression implemented by the military junta. The aim of the military junta was to dissolve revolutionary organizations and military prisons were one of the state institutions that were used to realize this aim.
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE June 24, 1997

    CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE June 24, 1997

    H4234 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE June 24, 1997 divorce decrees or property settlements gentleman from Maryland [Mr. contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act do not affect the life insurance pay- CUMMINGS], for the bipartisan manner of 1974 recommended by the President to the ments of Federal employees if no bene- in which this legislation has been han- Congress on May 29, 1997, with respect to the ficiary has been named. So the net ef- dled. I am pleased that we could par- People's Republic of China. fect of current law can punish children ticipate in this Corrections Day in this The SPEAKER pro tempore [Mr. and family members because of the manner and make a correction to legis- LAHOOD]. Pursuant to the order of the benefactor's failure to designate a new lation in a bipartisan fashion. It shows, House of Monday, June 23, 1997, the beneficiary. first, that the Congress does work; and, gentleman from Illinois [Mr. CRANE], H.R. 1316 could require the Office of second, that the government system and a Member in support of the joint Personnel Management to pay the Fed- does function when we see a problem resolution each will control 1 hour and eral employee's insurance proceeds in that can be corrected, when we are all 45 minutes. accordance with State domestic rela- rowing in the same direction. The Chair recognizes the gentleman tions orders. This would make sure So I am pleased again for the leader- from Illinois [Mr. CRANE]. that, in the event that no beneficiary ship provided by the gentleman from GENERAL LEAVE had been named, the life insurance ben- Georgia [Mr.
  • Port Raritancommissionoffers

    Port Raritancommissionoffers

    VOLUME 46 No 41 South Amboy, N. J., Friday, January 14, 1927 Price Four Cents. PORT RARITAN COMMISSION OFFERS ENTERTAIN PARENT FOURTH CHAUTAUQUA PETITION URGES GIVING COUNTY MAIN TEACHERS ASS'N TUJESDAY, JAN. 25TH PLAN FOR WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT Regular Monthly Meeting Tuesda Engaging Program Planned for Fi- ST. AND PAVING IT AS CONNECTING LINK Enjoys Program by Pupils. nal Event of Series. Would Reclaim Nearly 400 Acres Now Inundated—Urge St. .Mary's Parent-Tciachers Asso The fourth aiwi last of the Chau- Council Asked to Initiate Action—Ordinances Appointing elation held its regular monthly meet tauqua series of entertainments will Full^Cooperation of Property Owners—Ask For Condi ing on Tuesday of this week. be given in the high school auditor- Officials Adopted at Lengthy Session Opened With The attendance was good despit ium on Tuesday, Jan. 25th, both af- tional Options on Riparian Rights and Titles. the cold weather some parents travel ternoon and evening. Prayer. ing all tine way from Keyport to en- At 3:30 P. M. a musical prelude a joy the evening's entertainment. The Port Raxitan Commission pre- ===^^==^= will be given by the Betty Booth The paving of Main street from eented at the City Hall here Monday IMOITD ANf V AP|7rV'I\ The following program as pre Concert ,Co., and a special entertain- Washington avenue to Roses Corner sen ted speaks for itself; ment for the children will be pre- "• night a comprehensive plan for the Overture, "In the Middle of th, POLISH CITIZENS CLUB by (thb Board of Freeholders after (reclamation otf nearly four hundred sented by the famous ventriloquist, taking <yver the road 'by *hat body was Night", Alioe Kennedy, on the violin Frederick C.