Introduction 1
Notes Introduction 1. Nancy Mitford, Christmas Pudding (1932; New York: Carroll & Graf, 1998), 60, 124. 2. William J. Parker, The Detective and Mr. Dickens (New York: St. Martin’s, 1990). 3. In 2001, the Call for Papers for a conference on diaries announced that “diaries and journals have tended to be neglected by research” (Jonathan Hughes, “CFP: The Diary Genre,” 26 June 2001, Literary Call for Papers Mailing List, 22 November 2004, http://cfp.english.upenn.edu/archive/2001-06/0107.html). Searching for the keywords “diary” and “diaries” in the MLA Online Index in 2007 brought up 3,413 articles. 4. For an excellent overview of diary criticism through the mid-1990s, see Stuart Sherman, Telling Time: Clocks, Diaries, and English Diurnal Form 1660–1785 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), 13–14, 283–84. Landmark texts in the fi eld include Arthur Ponsonby, English Diaries (London: Methuen, 1923); Robert Fothergill, Private Chronicles: A Study of English Diaries (London: Oxford University Press, 1974); Thomas Mallon, A Book of One’s Own: People and Their Diaries (New York: Ticknor & Fields, 1984); Lawrence Rosenwald, Emerson and the Art of the Diary (New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988); and Felicity Nussbaum, The Autobiographical Subject: Gender and Ideology in Eighteenth-Century England (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989). Feminist diary scholarship has its own landmarks, including, besides Nussbaum, Elizabeth Hampsten, Read This Only to Yourself: The Private Writings of Midwestern Women: 1880–1910 (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1982); Lillian Schlissel, Women’s Diaries of the Westward Journey (New York: Schocken Books, 1982); Harriet Blodgett, Centuries of Female Days: Englishwomen’s Private Diaries (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1988); and Suzanne L.
[Show full text]