Economic Impact Study Technical Report 2019 Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Economic Impact Study Technical Report 2019 Table of Contents NEBRASKA AVIATION COUNTS! Economic Impact Study Technical Report 2019 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Objective of Study 1 1.2 Statewide Economic Impact Results 2 1.3 Overview of Approach 3 1.4 Summary of Findings 3 2. Overview of Nebraska Economy 4 2.1 General Economic Indicators 4 2.2 Heartland Floods and a “Particularly Harsh Winter” 4 2.3 Unemployment 5 2.4 Nebraska Economy Conclusion 6 3. Analysis and Summary Outcomes 6 3.1 Data Elements for Economic Modeling 7 3.1.1 Methods 8 3.2 Economic Modeling Process 8 3.2.1 Approach and Methods Used to Calculate Omaha Airport Authority Impacts 9 3.2.2 Approach, Methods, and Totals Used to Incorporate Military Aviation 10 Impacts 3.2.3 Margining for Retail 17 3.2.4 Rounding to Account for False Precision 17 3.3 Economic Impacts for Employment, Payroll, and Revenues 17 3.3.1 On-Airport Employment Activities 18 3.3.2 Commercial Service Visitor Spending Employment Impacts 21 3.3.3 General Aviation Visitor Spending Employment Impacts 22 3.4 Capital Expenditures on Construction 25 3.5 Overall Economic Impact by Airport 28 3.6 Summary of Economic Impacts 31 Table of Contents | i Table of Contents 4. Surveys and Data Collection Methods 33 4.1 Airport Manager Surveys 33 4.1.1 Approach 34 4.1.2 Key Data 34 4.2 Airport Tenant Surveys 35 4.2.1 Approach 35 4.2.2 Key Data 35 4.3 Commercial Passenger Surveys 36 4.3.1 Approach 36 4.3.2 Key Data 36 4.4 General Aviation Passenger Surveys 37 4.4.1 Approach 37 4.4.2 Key Data 37 5. Aerial Wildland Firefighting 38 5.1 Benefits 39 6. Value of Aircraft Assets in Nebraska 40 7. Air Cargo 41 8. Aerial Application 43 9. Regional Airline Service Challenges and the Impacts on Nebraska Airports 45 9.1 Nationwide Pilot Shortage 45 9.2 The Impact of the Pilot Shortage on Nebraska Airports 46 9.3 Fewer Carriers Available to Serve Small Communities 47 9.4 The Continuing Rising Cost of Essential Air Service 49 9.5 Nebraska Historic Regional Air Service Overview 50 9.6 Summary 61 Table of Contents | ii Table of Contents 10. Business/Industry Reliance on Aviation 62 10.1 Application of Survey Results, Energy Sector 67 10.2 Application of Survey Results, Finance Sector 68 11. Drones 69 Figures Figure 2.1 Unemployment Rates 5 Figure 2.2 Nebraska Farm Income 6 Figure 3.1 Flow of Direct Impacts and Spin-Off Effects 9 Figure 3.2 Economic Impacts of Military Assets in Nebraska Methodology 14 Figure 5.1 Nebraska Aerial Wildland Firefighting Bases 38 Figure 9.1 Historic Annual Scheduled Flight Departures by EAS Carriers in Nebraska 47 Figure 9.2 Historic EAS Subsidies and Enplanements at Nebraska Airports 49 Figure 9.3 Nebraska Commercial Service Airports 51 Figure 9.4 Historic Enplanements and Scheduled Departing Seats (2003-2018), 51 Nebraska Commercial Service Airports, Excluding OMA Figure 9.5 Historic Enplanements, Alliance Municipal Airport (2003-2018) 52 Figure 9.6 Historic Enplanements, Chadron Municipal Airport (2003-2018) 54 Figure 9.7 Historic Enplanements, Central Nebraska Regional Airport (2003-2018) 55 Figure 9.8 Historic Enplanements, Kearney Regional Airport (2003-2018) 57 Figure 9.9 Historic Enplanements, Lincoln Airport (2003-2018) 58 Figure 9.10 Historic Enplanements, North Platte Regional Airport (2003-2018) 59 Figure 9.11 Historic Enplanements, Western Nebraska Regional Airport (2003-2018) 60 Figure 10.1 Response by Industry - Air Usage 63 Table of Contents | iii Figures (cont.) Figure 10.2 Importance of Air Travel by Industry Sector 64 Figure 10.3 General Aviation Travel Usage by Industry 66 Figure 10.4 Nebraska Energy Production Estimates 2017 67 Figure 11.1 Nebraska Annual Employment 69 Figure 11.2 Nebraska Spending and Economic Impact 69 Figure 11.3 In Collaboration with the University of Nebraska - Lincoln’s Nebraska 70 Intelligent Mobile Unmanned Systems Laboratory, Homestead National Monument Launched a Prescribed Burn Program with a Drone (Courtesy: National Park Service) Tables Table 1.1 Total Annual Economic Contribution of Nebraska’s Aviation System 4 Table 3.1 Offutt AFB Military and Civilian Personnel and Payroll 11 Table 3.2 Offutt AFB Expenditures 12 Table 3.3 Overall Economic Impact of Nebraska Military Assets 15 Table 3.4 Aviation-Related Economic Impact of Nebraska Military Assets 16 Table 3.5 Economic Contribution of On-Airport Tenants, Airport Operations, and 18 Employees Table 3.6 Direct On-Airport Tenant and Management Impacts 19 Table 3.7 Annual Commercial Service Visitors in 2018 21 Table 3.8 Economic Contribution of Commercial Service Visitors 21 Table 3.9 General Aviation Visitor Spending by Airport 22 Table 3.10 Economic Contribution of Capital Expenditures on Construction 25 Table 3.11 Economic Contribution of Capital Expenditures on Construction by Airport 26 Table 3.12 Total Airport Economic Impact 28 Table 3.13 Airport Tenant Summary 31 Table 3.14 Construction Summary 31 Table of Contents | iv Tables (Cont.) Table 3.15 General Aviation Visitor Summary 31 Table 3.16 Commercial Service Visitor Summary 31 Table 3.17 Military Summary 32 Table 7.1 2017 Air Cargo Tonnage at Nebraska Airports 41 Table 9.1 Carriers Providing Service at EAS-Subsidized Communities 48 Table 9.2 Scheduled Air Service Summary, Nebraska Commercial Service Airports, 52 Excluding OMA Table 9.3 Air Service Summary, Alliance Municipal Airport (2003-2018) 53 Table 9.4 Air Service Summary, Chadron Municipal Airport (2003-2018) 54 Table 9.5 Air Service Summary, Central Nebraska Regional Airport (2003-2018) 56 Table 9.6 Air Service Summary, Kearney Regional Airport (2003-2018) 57 Table 9.7 Air Service Summary, Lincoln Airport (2003-2018) 58 Table 9.8 Air Service Summary, North Platte Regional Airport (2003-2018) 59 Table 9.9 Air Service Summary, Western Nebraska Regional Airport (2003-2018) 61 Table 10.1 Response by Location and Industry 62 Table 10.2 Response by Industry - Air Usage 63 Table 10.3 Importance of Air Travel by Industry Sector 63 Table 10.4 Average Client Trips Response by Industry 64 Table 10.5 Average Annual Visits by Industry 65 Table 10.6 Business Reduction Without Air Travel 65 Table 10.7 General Aviation Travel Usage by Industry 66 Table 11.1 Economic Impact of Drones 2015-2025 69 Appendixes Appendix A Studied Airports Appendix B Individual Airport Brochures Appendix C Case Studies Table of Contents | v Preface — A Snapshot in Time, Jargon, Terminology, and Intended Use Economic impact reports are a snapshot in time. Data collection methods, including surveys, interviews and reviews of available financial data, create a snapshot view of the economic impact of aviation in a State at the time the study was conducted. As discussed in Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Synthesis 7, the interdependent nature of applying spending patterns determined by survey to utilization of airport facilities from FAA and airport records can result in the study quickly becoming outdated. When considering the collection dates of survey data and application of utilization data, this study is a snapshot of economic impact of airports in Nebraska during the summer of 2019. The economic and social implication of the the Covid 19 pandemic and financial crisis are not known at the time of final publication and may not be known for year. Supplemental to this written document, a web-based calculator was developed in an attempt to overcome the snapshot criticism discussed in ACRP Synthesis 7. The calculator does attempt to apply general rules to changes in airport circumstances, including capital investment and changes in utilization. The calculator is intended to assist in understanding the general nature of economic changes. It is not intended as an exacting tool. An intentional effort is made in this document to avoid jargon and simplify terminology. For instance, all economic impacts that require the use of multiplies are simplified as “spin-off” impacts in the Executive Summary, Individual Airport Reports, and explanatory videos. It is understood that the intended use of this study is to quantify the value of airports in the State of Nebraska. The products of the report are directed at non-academic users and the general public. 1. Introduction Nebraska’s airports are vital to daily life and trade because airports connect people and businesses for personal travel, air cargo, or business activity. The state’s aviation system keeps Nebraska connected to the global marketplace and drives the local economy. To better understand the aviation industry’s value to the state economy, the Nebraska Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics (NDOT DOA) teamed with George Butler Associates (GBA), Olsson Associates, Marr-Arnold Planning, Kimley-Horn, Inc., and Dr. Christopher Decker of the University of Omaha to conduct an economic impact study titled Nebraska Aviation Counts! The study demonstrates the benefits that airports provide in Nebraska that are quantitative and qualitative in nature. Beyond the A mile of numbers such as jobs and payroll that an airport contributes to the highway will economy, airports play an integral role in the state’s transportation take you a system. The airport, however, serves a much larger role in a mile, a mile community or region. As an example, a mile of road between a of runway rural hospital and an air ambulance-capable airport may be the most important mile to saving a life. During this study, Nebraska can take you experienced devastating flooding that resulted in communities anywhere losing highway access. Local airports served as primary depots for relief efforts and served as the only access when supplies could not be delivered by ground transportation methods.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes
    March 2021 APPENDIX 25 BOX 31/3 AIRLINE CODES The information in this document is provided as a guide only and is not professional advice, including legal advice. It should not be assumed that the guidance is comprehensive or that it provides a definitive answer in every case. Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 000 ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU 001 AMERICAN AIRLINES 005 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 006 DELTA AIR LINES 012 NORTHWEST AIRLINES 014 AIR CANADA 015 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES 016 UNITED AIRLINES 018 CANADIAN AIRLINES INT 020 LUFTHANSA 023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (CARGO) 027 ALASKA AIRLINES 029 LINEAS AER DEL CARIBE (CARGO) 034 MILLON AIR (CARGO) 037 USAIR 042 VARIG BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 043 DRAGONAIR 044 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 045 LAN-CHILE 046 LAV LINEA AERO VENEZOLANA 047 TAP AIR PORTUGAL 048 CYPRUS AIRWAYS 049 CRUZEIRO DO SUL 050 OLYMPIC AIRWAYS 051 LLOYD AEREO BOLIVIANO 053 AER LINGUS 055 ALITALIA 056 CYPRUS TURKISH AIRLINES 057 AIR FRANCE 058 INDIAN AIRLINES 060 FLIGHT WEST AIRLINES 061 AIR SEYCHELLES 062 DAN-AIR SERVICES 063 AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 064 CSA CZECHOSLOVAK AIRLINES 065 SAUDI ARABIAN 066 NORONTAIR 067 AIR MOOREA 068 LAM-LINHAS AEREAS MOCAMBIQUE Page 2 of 19 Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 069 LAPA 070 SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES 071 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 072 GULF AIR 073 IRAQI AIRWAYS 074 KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 075 IBERIA 076 MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES 077 EGYPTAIR 078 AERO CALIFORNIA 079 PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 080 LOT POLISH AIRLINES 081 QANTAS AIRWAYS
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment F – Participants in the Agreement
    Revenue Accounting Manual B16 ATTACHMENT F – PARTICIPANTS IN THE AGREEMENT 1. TABULATION OF PARTICIPANTS 0B 475 BLUE AIR AIRLINE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS S.R.L. 1A A79 AMADEUS IT GROUP SA 1B A76 SABRE ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD. 1G A73 Travelport International Operations Limited 1S A01 SABRE INC. 2D 54 EASTERN AIRLINES, LLC 2I 156 STAR UP S.A. 2I 681 21 AIR LLC 2J 226 AIR BURKINA 2K 547 AEROLINEAS GALAPAGOS S.A. AEROGAL 2T 212 TIMBIS AIR SERVICES 2V 554 AMTRAK 3B 383 Transportes Interilhas de Cabo Verde, Sociedade Unipessoal, SA 3E 122 MULTI-AERO, INC. DBA AIR CHOICE ONE 3J 535 Jubba Airways Limited 3K 375 JETSTAR ASIA AIRWAYS PTE LTD 3L 049 AIR ARABIA ABDU DHABI 3M 449 SILVER AIRWAYS CORP. 3S 875 CAIRE DBA AIR ANTILLES EXPRESS 3U 876 SICHUAN AIRLINES CO. LTD. 3V 756 TNT AIRWAYS S.A. 3X 435 PREMIER TRANS AIRE INC. 4B 184 BOUTIQUE AIR, INC. 4C 035 AEROVIAS DE INTEGRACION REGIONAL 4L 174 LINEAS AEREAS SURAMERICANAS S.A. 4M 469 LAN ARGENTINA S.A. 4N 287 AIR NORTH CHARTER AND TRAINING LTD. 4O 837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. 4S 644 SOLAR CARGO, C.A. 4U 051 GERMANWINGS GMBH 4X 805 MERCURY AIR CARGO, INC. 4Z 749 SA AIRLINK 5C 700 C.A.L. CARGO AIRLINES LTD. 5J 203 CEBU PACIFIC AIR 5N 316 JOINT-STOCK COMPANY NORDAVIA - REGIONAL AIRLINES 5O 558 ASL AIRLINES FRANCE 5T 518 CANADIAN NORTH INC. 5U 911 TRANSPORTES AEREOS GUATEMALTECOS S.A. 5X 406 UPS 5Y 369 ATLAS AIR, INC. 50 Standard Agreement For SIS Participation – B16 5Z 225 CEMAIR (PTY) LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbus Regional Airport Authority
    COLUMBUS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY - PORT COLUMBUS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TRAFFIC REPORT June 2014 7/22/2014 Airline Enplaned Passengers Deplaned Passengers Enplaned Air Mail Deplaned Air Mail Enplaned Air Freight Deplaned Air Freight Landings Landed Weight Air Canada Express - Regional 2,377 2,278 - - - - 81 2,745,900 Air Canada Express Totals 2,377 2,278 - - - - 81 2,745,900 AirTran 5,506 4,759 - - - - 59 6,136,000 AirTran Totals 5,506 4,759 - - - - 59 6,136,000 American 21,754 22,200 - - - 306 174 22,210,000 Envoy Air** 22,559 22,530 - - 2 ,027 2 ,873 527 27,043,010 American Totals 44,313 44,730 - - 2,027 3,179 701 49,253,010 Delta 38,216 36,970 29,594 34,196 25,984 36,845 278 38,899,500 Delta Connection - ExpressJet 2,888 2,292 - - - - 55 3,709,300 Delta Connection - Chautauqua 15,614 14,959 - - 640 - 374 15,913,326 Delta Connection - Endeavor 4 ,777 4,943 - - - - 96 5,776,500 Delta Connection - GoJet 874 748 - - 33 - 21 1,407,000 Delta Connection - Shuttle America 6,440 7,877 - - 367 - 143 10,536,277 Delta Connection - SkyWest 198 142 - - - - 4 188,000 Delta Totals 69,007 67,931 29,594 34,196 27,024 36,845 971 76,429,903 Southwest 97,554 96,784 218,777 315,938 830 103,146,000 Southwest Totals 97,554 96,784 - - 218,777 315,938 830 103,146,000 United 3 ,411 3,370 13,718 6 ,423 1 ,294 8 ,738 30 3,990,274 United Express - ExpressJet 13,185 13,319 - - - - 303 13,256,765 United Express - Mesa 27 32 - - - - 1 67,000 United Express - Republic 4,790 5,133 - - - - 88 5,456,000 United Express - Shuttle America 9,825 9,076 - - - - 151 10,919,112
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Flight Statistics Report For
    DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TOTAL OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC March 2014 March YEAR TO DATE % of % of % Grand % Grand Incr./ Incr./ Total Incr./ Incr./ Total 2014 2013 Decr. Decr. 2014 2014 2013 Decr. Decr. 2014 OPERATIONS (1) Air Carrier 36,129 35,883 246 0.7% 74.2% 99,808 101,345 (1,537) -1.5% 73.5% Air Taxi 12,187 13,754 (1,567) -11.4% 25.0% 34,884 38,400 (3,516) -9.2% 25.7% General Aviation 340 318 22 6.9% 0.7% 997 993 4 0.4% 0.7% Military 15 1 14 1400.0% 0.0% 18 23 (5) -21.7% 0.0% TOTAL 48,671 49,956 (1,285) -2.6% 100.0% 135,707 140,761 (5,054) -3.6% 100.0% PASSENGERS (2) International (3) Inbound 68,615 58,114 10,501 18.1% 176,572 144,140 32,432 22.5% Outbound 70,381 56,433 13,948 24.7% 174,705 137,789 36,916 26.8% TOTAL 138,996 114,547 24,449 21.3% 3.1% 351,277 281,929 69,348 24.6% 2.8% International/Pre-cleared Inbound 42,848 36,668 6,180 16.9% 121,892 102,711 19,181 18.7% Outbound 48,016 39,505 8,511 21.5% 132,548 108,136 24,412 22.6% TOTAL 90,864 76,173 14,691 19.3% 2.0% 254,440 210,847 43,593 20.7% 2.1% Majors (4) Inbound 1,698,200 1,685,003 13,197 0.8% 4,675,948 4,662,021 13,927 0.3% Outbound 1,743,844 1,713,061 30,783 1.8% 4,724,572 4,700,122 24,450 0.5% TOTAL 3,442,044 3,398,064 43,980 1.3% 75.7% 9,400,520 9,362,143 38,377 0.4% 75.9% National (5) Inbound 50,888 52,095 (1,207) -2.3% 139,237 127,899 11,338 8.9% Outbound 52,409 52,888 (479) -0.9% 139,959 127,940 12,019 9.4% TOTAL 103,297 104,983 (1,686) -1.6% 2.3% 279,196 255,839 23,357 9.1% 2.3% Regionals (6) Inbound 382,759 380,328 2,431 0.6% 1,046,306 1,028,865 17,441 1.7% Outbound
    [Show full text]
  • Columbus Regional Airport Authority
    COLUMBUS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY - PORT COLUMBUS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TRAFFIC REPORT October, 2009 11/24/2009 Airline Enplaned Passengers Deplaned Passengers Enplaned Air Mail Deplaned Air Mail Enplaned Air Freight Deplaned Air Freight Landings Landed Weight Air Canada Jazz - Regional 1,385 1,432 0 0 0 0 75 2,548,600 Air Canada Jazz Totals 1,385 1,432 0 0 0 0 75 2,548,600 AirTran 16,896 16,563 0 0 0 0 186 20,832,000 AirTran Totals 16,896 16,563 0 0 0 0 186 20,832,000 American 13,482 13,047 10,256 13,744 0 75 120 14,950,000 American Connection - Chautauqua 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Eagle 22,258 22,818 0 0 2,497 3,373 550 24,434,872 American Totals 35,740 35,865 10,256 13,744 2,497 3,448 670 39,384,872 Continental 5,584 5,527 24,724 17,058 6,085 12,750 57 6,292,000 Continental Express - Chautauqua 4,469 4,675 0 0 477 0 110 4,679,500 Continental Express - Colgan 2,684 3,157 0 0 0 0 69 4,278,000 Continental Express - CommutAir 1,689 1,630 0 0 0 0 64 2,208,000 Continental Express - ExpressJet 3,821 3,334 0 0 459 1,550 100 4,122,600 Continental Totals 18,247 18,323 24,724 17,058 7,021 14,300 400 21,580,100 Delta 14,640 13,970 0 0 9,692 38,742 119 17,896,000 Delta Connection - Atlantic SE 2,088 2,557 0 1 369 2 37 2,685,800 Delta Connection - Chautauqua 13,857 13,820 0 0 0 0 359 15,275,091 Delta Connection - Comair 1,890 1,802 0 0 0 0 52 2,444,000 Delta Connection - Mesa/Freedom 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Delta Connection - Pinnacle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Delta Connection - Shuttle America 4,267 4,013 0 0 0 0 73 5,471,861 Delta Connection - SkyWest 0 0 0 0
    [Show full text]
  • Pilots Jump to Each Section Below Contents by Clicking on the Title Or Photo
    November 2018 Aero Crew News Your Source for Pilot Hiring and More... ExpressJet is taking off with a new Pilot Contract Top-Tier Compensation and Work Rules $40/hour first-year pay $10,000 annual override for First Officers, $8,000 for Captains New-hire bonus 100% cancellation and deadhead pay $1.95/hour per-diem Generous 401(k) match Friendly commuter and reserve programs ARE YOU READY FOR EXPRESSJET? FLEET DOMICILES UNITED CPP 126 - Embraer ERJ145 Chicago • Cleveland Spend your ExpressJet career 20 - Bombardier CRJ200 Houston • Knoxville knowing United is in Newark your future with the United Pilot Career Path Program Apply today at expressjet.com/apply. Questions? [email protected] expressjet.com /ExpressJetPilotRecruiting @expressjetpilots Jump to each section Below contents by clicking on the title or photo. November 2018 20 36 24 50 32 Also Featuring: Letter from the Publisher 8 Aviator Bulletins 10 Self Defense for Flight Crews 16 Trans States Airlines 42 4 | Aero Crew News BACK TO CONTENTS the grid New Airline Updated Flight Attendant Legacy Regional Alaska Airlines Air Wisconsin The Mainline Grid 56 American Airlines Cape Air Delta Air Lines Compass Airlines Legacy, Major, Cargo & International Airlines Hawaiian Airlines Corvus Airways United Airlines CommutAir General Information Endeavor Air Work Rules Envoy Additional Compensation Details Major ExpressJet Airlines Allegiant Air GoJet Airlines Airline Base Map Frontier Airlines Horizon Air JetBlue Airways Island Air Southwest Airlines Mesa Airlines Spirit Airlines
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Advisory Meeting MINUTES 1/7/2020 3:00 PM AIRPORT CONFERENCE ROOM
    Airport Advisory Meeting MINUTES 1/7/2020 3:00 PM AIRPORT CONFERENCE ROOM MEETING CALLED BY Scott Wardwell TYPE OF MEETING Monthly CHAIRPERSON Charles Namur NOTE TAKER Scott Wardwell Nate Grass, Granville Lamb, Bob Clark, Larry Clark, Scott Wardwell, Earl Twiggs, Tom Powers, ATTENDEES James Quinn, Martin Puckett, Ryan Pelletier and members of the public SILVER AIRWAY PRESENTATION KATIE LOUGHLIN & STEVEN ROSSUM DISCUSSION They indicated that they would source parts from C&L. They went to Delta to request codeshare. They have not received a response. Delta is growing Boston. They indicated that they might do maintenance in PQI. Right now the plan will be for them to operate out of Terminal E. The gate that Silver has used for Bar Harbor in summer is being returned to JetBlue. They indicated they want to be involved in the community and want to do what is right for the community. They indicated that the schedule is open. They will set down and look at the schedule and add more flights if it is warranted. They will honor tickets in Bangor. Mr. Rossum said he put his name on the application and is committed to winter operations. The can operated in the winter at PQI. Examples of their winter operations experience is Cleveland and Dulles. They wouldn’t do the ATR until 2021 if they do it at all. The cost of operating the SAAB is lower and makes it more attractive to operate. Mr. Rossum said that USDOT said that their operation stunk and asked them to not bid any EAS markets for a while.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE Contact: Melissa (Missy) Roberts Vice President of Sales and Marketing 907-771-2510 or 907-230-2913 [email protected] Or Kristin Folmar Director Sales & Marketing 907-771-2599 or 907-301-8871 [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 18, 2016 PENAIR STARTS NEW FLIGHTS FROM PORTLAND, OR TO REDDING, CA AND ARCATA/EUREKA, CA ANCHORAGE, ALASKA – PenAir, one of Alaska’s largest regional airlines, expands their flight schedule out of Portland, with two new destinations on April 21, 2016. PenAir will start twice daily service between both Redding, CA and Arcata/Eureka, CA and Portland, OR. The addition of these two destinations expands PenAir’s offerings from Portland to four communities. In addition to Redding and Arcata/Eureka, PenAir also serves Crescent City, CA and North Bend, OR from their Portland hub. According to Danny Seybert, PenAir’s CEO, “PenAir is thrilled to be expanding our service out of Portland, OR. We have been operating for 60 years throughout Alaska and for the last several years in the Northeast U.S. The expansion of our flights in Portland provides customers with our Alaskan brand of reliable customer service and the benefit of our connectivity to flights with our codeshare partner Alaska Airlines and the other airlines offering service to more than 55 destinations from Portland International Airport.” “PenAir began operating daily service out of Portland, OR, to Crescent City, CA, on September 15, 2015. Since then, we have met with community leaders from each of these three additional communities”, said Dave Hall, PenAir’s Chief Operating Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    Case 1:10-cv-02076-EGS Document 35 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) NORTHERN AIR CARGO, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ) Civil Action No. 10-2076 (EGS) ) Defendant, ) ) and ) ) PENINSULA AIRWAYS, INC., ) ) Defendant-Intervenor. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 3, 2010, the United States Postal Service (the “Postal Service”) granted an equitable tender of nonpriority mainline bypass mail to Peninsula Airways, Inc. (“PenAir”) on five mainline routes in rural Alaska pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 5402(g)(5)(c) (“§ 5402(g)(5)(C)”). This equitable tender is now being challenged by three mainline carriers – Northern Air Cargo (“NAC”), Tatonduk Outfitters Ltd d/b/a Everts Air Cargo (“Everts”), and Lynden Air Cargo LLC (“Lynden”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”). Specifically, plaintiffs challenge the Postal Service’s purportedly ultra vires determination that PenAir had satisfied the “Prior Service and Capacity Requirement” of 39 U.S.C. § 5402(g)(1)(A)(iv)(II) (“§ 5402(g)(1)(A)(iv)(II)”) as of Case 1:10-cv-02076-EGS Document 35 Filed 06/10/11 Page 2 of 25 December 3, 2010.1 Plaintiffs seek both declaratory and injunctive relief. See generally Compl. Pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, as well as the cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant Postal Service and Defendant-Intervenor PenAir (collectively, “defendants”). Upon consideration of the motions, the responses and replies thereto, the applicable law, the entire record, and for the following reasons, the Court hereby DENIES plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and GRANTS defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2
    DCCD Doc No. 28 28/4/09 (English only) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2 May 2009) CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY AIRCRAFT TO THIRD PARTIES AND CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE TO THIRD PARTIES, RESULTING FROM ACTS OF UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE INVOLVING AIRCRAFT (Presented by the Air Crash Victims Families Group) 1. INTRODUCTION – SUPPLEMENTAL AND OTHER COMPENSATIONS 1.1 The apocalyptic terrorist attack by the means of four hi-jacked planes committed against the World Trade Center in New York, NY , the Pentagon in Arlington, VA and the aborted flight ending in a crash in the rural area in Shankville, PA ON September 11th, 2001 is the only real time example that triggered this proposed Convention on Compensation for Damage to Third Parties from Acts of Unlawful Interference Involving Aircraft. 1.2 It is therefore important to look towards the post incident resolution of this tragedy in order to adequately and pro actively complete ONE new General Risk Convention (including compensation for ALL catastrophic damages) for the twenty first century. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Immediately after September 11th, 2001 – the Government and Congress met with all affected and interested parties resulting in the “Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act” (Public Law 107-42-Sept. 22,2001). 2.2 This Law provided the basis for Rules and Regulations for: a) Airline Stabilization; b) Aviation Insurance; c) Tax Provisions; d) Victims Compensation; and e) Air Transportation Safety. DCCD Doc No. 28 - 2 - 2.3 The Airline Stabilization Act created the legislative vehicle needed to reimburse the air transport industry for their losses of income as a result of the flight interruption due to the 911 attack.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Regional Airlines' Response to the Pilot Shortage And
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Honors Program Theses and Projects Undergraduate Honors Program 4-24-2018 An Analysis of Regional Airlines’ Response to the Pilot Shortage and How It Impacts Collegiate Pilots Jared Samost Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj Part of the Management and Operations Commons Recommended Citation Samost, Jared. (2018). An Analysis of Regional Airlines’ Response to the Pilot Shortage and How It Impacts Collegiate Pilots. In BSU Honors Program Theses and Projects. Item 266. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj/266 Copyright © 2018 Jared Samost This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Running head: REGIONAL AIRLINES’ RESPONSE TO THE PILOT SHORTAGE 1 An Analysis of Regional Airlines’ Response to the Pilot Shortage and How It Impacts Collegiate Pilots Jared Samost Submitted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for Commonwealth Honors in Aviation Science Bridgewater State University April 24, 2018 Prof. Michael Welch, Thesis Advisor Prof. Michael Farley, Committee Member Prof. Veronica Cote, Committee Member REGIONAL AIRLINES’ RESPONSE TO THE PILOT SHORTAGE 2 Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Iv Regionals/Commuters
    CHAPTER IV REGIONALS/COMMUTERS For purposes of the Federal Aviation REVIEW OF 20032 Administration (FAA) forecasts, air carriers that are included as part of the regional/commuter airline industry meet three criteria. First, a The results for the regional/commuter industry for regional/commuter carrier flies a majority of their 2003 reflect the continuation of a trend that started available seat miles (ASMs) using aircraft having with the events of September 11th and have been 70 seats or less. Secondly, the service provided by drawn out by the Iraq War and Severe Acute these carriers is primarily regularly scheduled Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). These “shocks” to passenger service. Thirdly, the primary mission of the system have led to the large air carriers posting the carrier is to provide connecting service for its losses in passengers for 3 years running. The code-share partners. losses often reflect diversions in traffic to the regional/commuter carriers. These carriers During 2003, 75 reporting regional/commuter recorded double-digit growth in both capacity and airlines met this definition. Monthly traffic data for traffic for the second time in as many years. History 10 of these carriers was compiled from the has demonstrated that the regional/commuter Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Form 41 industry endures periods of uncertainty better than and T-100 filings. Traffic for the remaining the larger air carriers. During the oil embargo of 65 carriers was compiled solely from T-100 filings. 1 1973, the recession in 1990, and the Gulf War in Prior to fiscal year 2003, 10 regionals/commuters 1991, the regional/commuter industry consistently reported on DOT Form 41 while 65 smaller outperformed the larger air carriers.
    [Show full text]