DOCSLIB.ORG

Investigator Marine Park Report Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investigator Marine Park Report Impact Statement Investigator Marine Park Report Impact Statement A report prepared for Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Prepared by e c o n s e a r c h In association with the Australian Workplace Innovation and Social Research Centre, Dr Hugh Kirkman, Dr Simon Bryars and James Brook 20 August 2012 EconSearch Pty Ltd 214 Kensington Road Marryatville SA 5068 Tel: (08) 8431 5533 Fax: (08) 8431 7710 www.econsearch.com.au DEWNR Investigator Marine Park Regional Impact Statement Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................ i List of Tables .................................................................................................................ii List of Appendix Tables ..................................................................................................ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................... iii List of Appendix Figures ............................................................................................... iii Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ iv Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... v Document History and Status ....................................................................................... v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... vi 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Marine Park Planning Process .................................................................... 1 1.2 Policy Commitments ................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Displaced Commercial Fishing Policy Framework .......................... 4 2. Method of Assessment ........................................................................................ 5 2.1 Ecological ................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Economic .................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Social ......................................................................................................... 7 3. Investigator Marine Park Description ................................................................. 10 3.1 Ecological Description .............................................................................. 10 3.2 Socio-economic Profile ............................................................................. 11 4. Summary of Impacts .......................................................................................... 14 4.1 Ecological ................................................................................................. 14 4.1.1 Habitats ....................................................................................... 14 4.1.2 Species ........................................................................................ 14 4.1.3 Ecosystems ................................................................................. 21 4.1.4 Case study - Reef fish at offshore islands .................................... 22 4.2 Economic .................................................................................................. 23 4.2.1 Commercial Fishing ..................................................................... 23 4.2.2 Aquaculture .................................................................................. 31 4.2.3 Property Prices ............................................................................ 31 4.2.4 Tourism ........................................................................................ 31 4.2.5 Port, Harbour and Shipping Operations ....................................... 32 4.2.6 Mining .......................................................................................... 32 4.2.7 Coastal Development ................................................................... 32 4.3 Social ....................................................................................................... 33 4.3.1 Summary of method ..................................................................... 33 4.3.2 Expected social impacts – at a glance ......................................... 34 4.3.3 Education and Wellbeing ............................................................. 35 4.3.4 Culture and Heritage .................................................................... 35 4.3.5 Recreation and Fishing ................................................................ 36 4.3.6 Local Government, Population and Housing ................................ 38 4.3.7 Community................................................................................... 38 4.3.8 SEIFA based analysis of impacts ................................................. 39 Page: i e c o n s e a r c h DEWNR Investigator Marine Park Regional Impact Statement 4.3.9 Next Steps in Social Impact Assessment ..................................... 40 References ................................................................................................................. 42 Appendix 1 Socio-economic Profile – West Coast Bays ................................. 45 Appendix 2 Activities and Uses Tables ........................................................... 59 Appendix 3 List of Parties Consulted .............................................................. 72 Appendix 4 MPSIAT feedback ........................................................................ 75 Appendix 5 Map of Marine Park Showing Draft Zoning ................................... 81 List of Tables Table 1-1 Public consultation process to date ............................................................ 3 Table 3-1 Summary of habitats ................................................................................ 11 Table 3-2 Summary of key economic and social indicators for the West Coast Bays region ................................................................................... 13 Table 4-1 Potential first-order responses of some indicator species a ....................... 19 Table 4-2 Other species which may respond to or benefit from protection ............... 20 Table 4-3 Regional economic impact of marine park zoning based on SARDI estimates of displaced effort .................................................................... 24 Table 4-4 Regional economic impact of marine park zoning on the Abalone fishery based on SARDI estimates of displaced effort .............................. 26 Table 4-5 Regional economic impact of marine park zoning on the Northern Zone Rock Lobster fishery based on SARDI estimates of displaced effort ........................................................................................ 27 Table 4-6 Average annual Marine Scalefish effort in draft sanctuary zones by sector .................................................................................................. 29 Table 4-7 Average annual Marine Scalefish catch in draft sanctuary zones by main species ....................................................................................... 29 Table 4-8 Social Impact for West Coast Bays Impact Region .................................. 39 List of Appendix Tables Appendix Table 1-1 Summary of key economic and social indicators for the West Coast Bays region .......................................................................... 46 Appendix Table 1-2 Age distribution of the population for the West Coast Bays region and SA, 2000/01 to 2009/10 ................................................. 47 Appendix Table 1-3 Highest level of qualifications for persons aged 15 and over in the West Coast Bays region and SA, 2001 and 2006 a ................. 49 Appendix Table 1-4 School enrolments in the West Coast Bays region and SA, 2001, 2006 and 2011 ........................................................................ 50 Appendix Table 1-5 Employment, household income and household expenditure, West Coast Bays region, 2009/10 a ..................................... 54 Appendix Table 1-6 Components of gross regional product in the West Coast Bays region by industry, 2009/10 a ................................................ 55 Page: ii e c o n s e a r c h DEWNR Investigator Marine Park Regional Impact Statement Appendix Table 1-7 Value of imports and exports by industry, West Coast Bays region, 2009/10 a ............................................................................. 56 Appendix Table 4-1 General views about the Investigator Marine Park .................... 75 Appendix Table 4-2 Tourism, education & wellbeing impacts for Investigator Marine Park ............................................................................................. 76 Appendix Table 4-3 Culture and heritage impacts for Investigator Marine Park 77 Appendix Table 4-4 Recreation & fishing impacts for Investigator Marine Park 78 Appendix Table 4-5 Population & housing impacts for Investigator Marine Park 79 Appendix Table 4-6 Community response impacts for Investigator Marine Park 80 List of Figures Figure 1–1 Marine Park Zones .................................................................................... 2 Figure 4–1 Simplified conceptual
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Advisory Committee Annual Report 2011-12
    Wilderness Advisory Committee and Wilderness Protection Act 1992 ANNUAL REPORTS 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 Wilderness Advisory Committee Annual Report 2011-12 Wilderness Protection Act 1992 Annual Report 2011-12 For further information please contact: Executive Officer Wilderness Advisory Committee C/- Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE SA 5001 Telephone: (08) 8124 4786 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.environment.sa.gov.au ABN: 36 702 093 234 ISSN: 1832-9357 September 2012 _______________________________________________________________________________ Wilderness Advisory Committee Annual Report 2011-12 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ....................................................................4 WILDERNESS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT .................................5 PLANS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................5 OPERATIONS AND INITIATIVES ...............................................................5 ACHIEVEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES .........................................................5 WILDERNESS PROTECTION AREA MANAGEMENT PLANS .............................6 REQUESTS FOR ASSESSMENT TO THE WILDERNESS ADVISORY COMMITTEE .....7 ROLE, LEGISLATION AND STRUCTURE......................................................7 OBJECT OF THE WILDERNESS PROTECTION ACT .....................................7 ROLE OF THE COMMITTEE.................................................................7 FUNCTIONS OF THE WILDERNESS ADVISORY
    [Show full text]
  • Rodondo Island
    BIODIVERSITY & OIL SPILL RESPONSE SURVEY January 2015 NATURE CONSERVATION REPORT SERIES 15/04 RODONDO ISLAND BASS STRAIT NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES, PARKS, WATER AND ENVIRONMENT RODONDO ISLAND – Oil Spill & Biodiversity Survey, January 2015 RODONDO ISLAND BASS STRAIT Biodiversity & Oil Spill Response Survey, January 2015 NATURE CONSERVATION REPORT SERIES 15/04 Natural and Cultural Heritage Division, DPIPWE, Tasmania. © Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment ISBN: 978-1-74380-006-5 (Electronic publication only) ISSN: 1838-7403 Cite as: Carlyon, K., Visoiu, M., Hawkins, C., Richards, K. and Alderman, R. (2015) Rodondo Island, Bass Strait: Biodiversity & Oil Spill Response Survey, January 2015. Natural and Cultural Heritage Division, DPIPWE, Hobart. Nature Conservation Report Series 15/04. Main cover photo: Micah Visoiu Inside cover: Clare Hawkins Unless otherwise credited, the copyright of all images remains with the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment. This work is copyright. It may be reproduced for study, research or training purposes subject to an acknowledgement of the source and no commercial use or sale. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Branch Manager, Wildlife Management Branch, DPIPWE. Page | 2 RODONDO ISLAND – Oil Spill & Biodiversity Survey, January 2015 SUMMARY Rodondo Island was surveyed in January 2015 by staff from the Natural and Cultural Heritage Division of the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE) to evaluate potential response and mitigation options should an oil spill occur in the region that had the potential to impact on the island’s natural values. Spatial information relevant to species that may be vulnerable in the event of an oil spill in the area has been added to the Australian Maritime Safety Authority’s Oil Spill Response Atlas and all species records added to the DPIPWE Natural Values Atlas.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status of Western Blue Groper at Selected Locations in South Australia: Results of the 2014 Survey and Comparison with Historical Surveys
    Current status of western blue groper at selected locations in South Australia: results of the 2014 survey and comparison with historical surveys Report to the Conservation Council of South Australia James Brook 2014 Brook (2014) Status of western blue groper in South Australia This publication should be cited as: Brook, J. (2014). Current status of western blue groper at selected locations in South Australia: results of the 2014 survey and comparison with historical surveys. Report to the Conservation Council of South Australia. J Diversity Pty Ltd, Adelaide. Cover photo: Male western blue groper (Achoerodus gouldii) at the Investigator Group, 2006. Photo credit: James Brook. Disclaimer The findings and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Conservation Council of South Australia. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this report are factually correct, the Conservation Council of South Australia and the author do not accept responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the contents. The author does not accept liability for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this report. 2 Brook (2014) Status of western blue groper in South Australia Acknowledgements The current report was funded by an Australian Government Community Environment Grant through the Conservation Council of South Australia (CCSA). Thanks are due to: • Alex Gaut (CCSA), Steve Leske (CCSA/Reef Watch), and all of the volunteers who collected the data • Dr Simon Bryars, who was a sounding board for discussion and reviewed a draft of the report • Dr Scoresby Shepherd AO (SARDI) for providing historical data and reviewing a draft of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue3.7 MB
    Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
    [Show full text]
  • Ceduna 3D Marine Seismic Survey, Great Australian Bight
    Referral of proposed action Project title: Ceduna 3D Marine Seismic Survey, Great Australian Bight 1 Summary of proposed action 1.1 Short description BP Exploration (Alpha) Limited (BP) proposes to undertake the Ceduna three-dimensional (3D) marine seismic survey across petroleum exploration permits EPP 37, EPP 38, EPP 39 and EPP 40 located in the Great Australian Bight (GAB). The proposed survey area is located in Commonwealth marine waters of the Ceduna sub-basin, between 1000 m and 3000 m deep, and is about 400 km west of Port Lincoln and 300 km southwest of Ceduna in South Australia. The proposed seismic survey is scheduled to commence no earlier than October 2011 and to conclude no later than end of May 2012. The survey is expected to take approximately six months to complete allowing for typical weather downtime. Outside this time window, metocean conditions become unsuitable for 3D seismic operations. The survey will be conducted by a specialist seismic survey vessel towing a dual seismic source array and 12 streamers, each 8,100 m long. 1.2 Latitude and longitude The proposed survey area is shown in Figure 1 with boundary coordinates provided in Table 1. Table 1. Boundary coordinates for the proposed survey area (GDA94) Point Latitude Longitude 1 35°22'15.815"S 130°48'50.107"E 2 35°11'50.810"S 131°02'16.061"E 3 35°02'37.061"S 131°02'15.972"E 4 35°24'55.520"S 131°30'41.981"E 5 35°14'38.653"S 131°42'16.982"E 6 35°00'47.460"S 131°41'40.052"E 7 34°30'09.196"S 131°02'44.991"E 8 34°06'27.572"S 131°02'11.557"E 9 33°41'24.007"S 130°31'04.931"E 10 33°41'25.575"S 130°15'22.936"E 11 34°08'47.552"S 130°12'34.972"E 12 34°09'16.169"S 129°41'03.591"E 13 34°18'22.970"S 129°29'32.951"E BP Ceduna 3D MSS Referral Page 1 of 48 1.3 Locality and property description The proposed seismic survey will take place in the permit areas for EPP 37, EPP 38, EPP 39 and EPP 40.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudojanira Investigatoris, New Species, from Southern
    JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, 10(3): 520-527, 1990 PSEUDOJANIRA INVESTIGATORIS, NEW SPECIES, FROM SOUTHERN AUSTRALIA: SECOND SPECIES IN THE PSEUDOJANIRIDAE (ISOPODA: ASELLOTA) WITH NEW MORPHOLOGICAL INFORMATION AND INTERPRETATIONS Gary C. B. Poore and Jean Just ABSTRACT Pseudojanira investigatoris, new species, differs from P. stenetrioides, the only other species in the Pseudojaniroidea, in proportions and setation of the body, mouthparts, pereiopods, and pleopods. The interaction of the penes and male pleopods 1 and 2 in sperm transfer is deduced. The spermatheca opens through a short cuticular organ into a furrow which it shares with the prospective oopore and stylet receptacle on the anteroventral surface of pereionite 5 of the preparatory female. The spermatheca attaches at a single point to the ovary. The spermatheca, cuticular organ, and stylet receptacle are lost in the molt to ovigerous female and only the enlarged oopore remains. Pseudojanira stenetrioides from South including fully mature males and females. Africa was originally placed in the Janiridae This study confirms the main findings of by Barnard (1925) on the basis of one fe­ Wilson (1986a). It allows us to clarify or male. Kensley (1977) retained the genus in correct previous descriptions, and adds new the Janiridae when describing a single male. information on several characteristics which Wilson (1986a) redescribed P. stenetrioides bear on the relationships of the Pseudoja- from the same two specimens. Based on new niridae to Janiroidea and Stenetrioidea. information about male pleopods 1 and 2, The second species of Pseudojanira ne­ the female cuticular organ, and the sper­ cessitates the removal of certain characters matheca, he concluded that Pseudojanira is included in Wilson's (1986a) diagnosis of so different from other janirids that not only Pseudojaniridae and, by implication Pseu­ does it not belong in that family, but does dojanira, as they are of significance only at not belong in the asellotan superfamily Jani­ the species level.
    [Show full text]
  • (Haliaeetus Leucogaster) and the Eastern Osprey (Pandion Cristatus
    SOUTH AUSTRALIAN ORNITHOLOGIST VOLUME 37 - PART 1 - March - 2011 Journal of The South Australian Ornithological Association Inc. In this issue: Osprey and White-bellied Sea-Eagle populations in South Australia Birds of Para Wirra Recreation Park Bird report 2009 March 2011 1 Distribution and status of White-bellied Sea-Eagle, Haliaeetus leucogaster, and Eastern Osprey, Pandion cristatus, populations in South Australia T. E. DENNIS, S. A. DETmAR, A. V. BROOkS AND H. m. DENNIS. Abstract Surveys throughout coastal regions and in the INTRODUCTION Riverland of South Australia over three breeding seasons between May 2008 and October 2010, Top-order predators, such as the White-bellied estimated the population of White-bellied Sea- Sea-Eagle, Haliaeetus leucogaster, and Eastern Eagle, Haliaeetus leucogaster, as 70 to 80 pairs Osprey, Pandion cristatus, are recognised and Eastern Osprey, Pandion cristatus, as 55 to indicator species by which to measure 65 pairs. Compared to former surveys these data wilderness quality and environmental integrity suggest a 21.7% decline in the White-bellied Sea- in a rapidly changing world (Newton 1979). In Eagle population and an 18.3% decline for Eastern South Australia (SA) both species have small Osprey over former mainland habitats. Most (79.2%) populations with evidence of recent declines sea-eagle territories were based on offshore islands linked to increasing human activity in coastal including Kangaroo Island, while most (60.3%) areas (Dennis 2004; Dennis et al. 2011 in press). osprey territories were on the mainland and near- A survey of the sea-eagle population in the shore islets or reefs. The majority of territories were mid 1990s found evidence for a decline in the in the west of the State and on Kangaroo Island, with breeding range since European colonisation three sub-regions identified as retaining significant (Dennis and Lashmar 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • 080058-89.02.017.Pdf
    t9l .Ig6I pup spu?Fr rr"rl?r1mv qnos raq1oaqt dq panqs tou pus 916I uao^\teq sluauennboJ puu surelqord lusue8suuur 1eneds wq sauo8a uc .fu1mpw snorru,r aql uI luar&(oldua ',uq .(tg6l a;oJareqt puuls1oore8ueltr 0t dpo 1u reted lS sr ur saiuzqc aql s,roqs osIB elqeJ srqt usrmoJ 'urpilsny 'V'S) puels tseSrul geu oq; ur 1sa?re1p4ql aql 3o luetugedeq Z alq?J rrr rtr\oqs su padoldua puu prr"lsr aroqsJJorrprJpnsnv qlnos lsJErel aql ruJ ere,u eldoed ZS9 I feqf pa roqs snsseC srllsll?ls dq r ?olp sp qlr^\ puplsl oorp8ue1 Jo neomg u"rl?Jlsnv eql uo{ sorn8g luereJ lsour ,u1 0g€ t Jo eW T86I ul puu 00S € ,{lel?urxorddu sr uoqelndod '(derd ur '8ur,no:8 7r luosaJd eqJ petec pue uoqcnpord ,a uosurqoU) uoqecrJqndro3 peredard Smeq ,{11uermc '(tg6l )potsa^q roJ perualo Suraq puel$ oql Jo qJnu eru sda,r-rnsaseql3o EFSer pa[elop aqJ &usJ qlvrr pedolaaap fuouoce Surqsg puu Surure; e puu pue uosurqo;) pegoder useq aleq pesn spoporu palles-er su,rr prrqsr eql sreo,{ Eurpeet:ns eq1 re,ro prru s{nser druuruqord aqt pue (puep1 ooreSuqtr rnq 698I uI peuopwqs sE^\ elrs lrrrod seaeell eql SumnJcxa) sprrelsl aroqsJJo u"{e4snv qlnos '998I raqueJeo IIl eprelepv Jo tuaruslDesIeuroJ oqt aql Jo lsou uo palelduor ueeq A\ou aaeq s,{e,rrns aro3aq ,(ueduo3 rr"4u4snv qtnos qtgf 'oAE eqt dq ,{nt p:6o1org sree,{009 6 ol 000 L uea r1aq palulosr ur slors8rry1 u,no1paserd 6rll J?eu salaed 'o?e ;o lrrrod ererrirspuulsr Surura sr 3ql Jo dllJolpu aq; sree,{ paqslqplse peuuurad lE s?a\lueurep1os uuedorng y 009 0I spuplsl dpearg pue uosr"ed pup o8e srea,{ 'seruolocuorJ-"3s rel?l puB
    [Show full text]
  • Musgrave Subregional Description
    Musgrave Subregional Description Landscape Plan for Eyre Peninsula - Appendix D The Musgrave subregion extends from Mount Camel Beach in the north inland to the Tod Highway, and then south to Lock and then west across to Lake Hamilton in the south. It includes the Southern Ocean including the Investigator Group, Flinders Island and Pearson Isles. QUICK STATS Population: Approximately 1,050 Major towns (population): Elliston (300), Lock (340) Traditional Owners: Nauo and Wirangu nations Local Governments: District Council of Elliston, District Council of Lower Eyre Peninsula and Wudinna District Council Land Area: Approximately 5,600 square kilometres Main land uses (% of land area): Grazing (30% of total land area), conservation (20% of land area), cropping (18% of land area) Main industries: Agriculture, health care, education Annual Rainfall: 380 - 430mm Highest Elevation: Mount Wedge (249 metres AHD) Coastline length: 130 kilometres (excludes islands) Number of Islands: 12 2 Musgrave Subregional Description Musgrave What’s valued in Musgrave Pearson Island is a spectacular The landscapes and natural resources of the Musgrave unspoilt island with abundant and subregion are integral to the community’s livelihoods and curious wildlife. lifestyles. The Musgrave subregion values landscapes include large The coast is enjoyed by locals and visitors for its beautiful patches of remnant bush and big farms. Native vegetation landscapes, open space and clean environment. Many is valued by many in the farming community and many local residents particularly value the solitude, remoteness recognise its contribution to ecosystem services, and and scenic beauty of places including Sheringa Beach, that it provides habitat for birds and reptiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining the Monitoring of Pup Production at Key Australian Sea Lion Colonies in South Australia (2013/14)
    Maintaining the monitoring of pup production at key Australian sea lion colonies in South Australia (2013/14) Simon D Goldsworthy, Alice I Mackay, Peter D Shaughnessy, Fred Bailleul and Clive R McMahon SARDI Publication No. F2010/000665-4 SARDI Research Report Series No. 818 SARDI Aquatics Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 December 2014 Final report to the Australian Marine Mammal Centre Goldsworthy, S.D. et al. Australian sea lion population monitoring Maintaining the monitoring of pup production at key Australian sea lion colonies in South Australia (2013/14) Final report to the Australian Marine Mammal Centre Simon D Goldsworthy, Alice I Mackay, Peter D Shaughnessy, Fred Bailleul and Clive R McMahon SARDI Publication No. F2010/000665-4 SARDI Research Report Series No. 818 December 2014 II Goldsworthy, S.D. et al. Australian sea lion population monitoring This publication may be cited as: Goldsworthy, S.D.1, Mackay, A.I.1, Shaughnessy, P.D. 1, 2, Bailleul, F1 and McMahon, C.R.3 (2014). Maintaining the monitoring of pup production at key Australian sea lion colonies in South Australia (2013/14). Final Report to the Australian Marine Mammal Centre. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2010/000665-4. SARDI Research Report Series No. 818. 66pp. Cover Photo: Alice I. Mackay 1 SARDI Aquatic Sciences, PO Box 120, Henley Beach, SA 5022 2South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000 3 Sydney Institute of Marine Science, 19 Chowder Bay Road, Mosman NSW, 2088 South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • South Australian Ornithologist
    - THE: South Australian Ornithologist. VOL. XIV.] AFIUL 1, 1938. [Part 6. Notes on some Birds seen on Flinders and other islands off the Eyre Peninsula coasts, February­ March, 1937. By H. H. Finlayson. The birds noted below wereseen during 11 stay of some three weeks in February of the year 1937 on Flinders. Island and during shorter visits to some other islands of neighbouring coasts and waters. The observations are of a random and desultory kind, being made incidentally to enquiry into the mammal fauna of the places named, and do not relate to more than a small part of the total avifauna, nor include even all the prominent forms. With the exception of Prof. J. B. Cleland's paper on the birds of Pearson's Island (Trans. Roy. Soc. S.A., Vol. XLVII, 119/ 126, 1923), little seems to have been published on the birds of the smaller islands of the South Australian coasts, and even such fragmentary records as the following, provided they are made at first hand, may have value as contributions to the completed lists of the future. Flinders Island has an. area of about 9,000 acres, and lies about 18 miles west of Elliston on the Eyre Peninsula mainland. It has the structure, usual hereabouts, of a limestone platform resting on granite base, which is exposed at the waterline. The coastline is varied and is occupied by cliffs, boulder-shingle, and sand beach in about equal proportion. The soil is in general a shallow light sandy .loam, although firmer red soils occur on the south-west side.
    [Show full text]
  • Eyre Peninsula OCEAN 7
    Mount F G To Coober Pedy (See Flinders H I Olympic Dam J Christie Ranges and Outback Region) Village Andamooka Wynbring Roxby Downs To Maralinga Lyons Tarcoola WOOMERA PROHIBITED AREA (Restricted Entry) Malbooma 87 Lake Lake Younghusband Ferguson Patricia 1 1 Glendambo Kingoonya Lake Hanson Lake Torrens 'Coondambo' Lake Yellabinna Regional Kultanaby Lake Hart National Park Lake Harris Wirramn na Woomera Reserve Lake Torre Lake Lake Gairdner Pimba Windabout ns Everard National Park Pernatty Lagoon Island Wirrappa See map on opposite Lake page for continuation Lagoon Dog Fence 'Oakden Hill' Gairdner 'Mahanewo' 2 Yumbarra Conservation Stuart 2 Park 'Lake Everard' Lake Finnis 'Kangaroo To Nundroo (See OTC Earth Wells' 'Yalymboo' Lake Dutton map opposite) Station Bookaloo Pureba Conservation 'Moonaree' Lake Highway Penong 57 1 'Kondoolka' Lake MacFarlane Park 16 Acraman 'Yadlamalka' 59 Nunnyah Con. Res Ceduna 'Yudnapinna' Mudlamuckla 'Hiltaba' Jumpuppy Hesso To Hawker (See Bay Hill Flinders and Koolgera Cooria Hill Outback Region) Point Bell 41 Con. Res 87 Murat Smoky Mt. Gairdner 51 Goat Is. Bay 93 33 Unalla Hill 'Low Hill' St. Peter Smoky Bay Horseshoe Evans Is. Gawler Tent Hill Quorn Island 29 27 Barkers Hill 'Cariewerloo' Hill Eyre Wirrulla 67 'Yardea' 'Mount Ive' Nuyts Archipelago Is. Conservation Haslam 'Thurlga' 50 'Nonning' Park Flinders Port Augusta St. Francis Point Brown 76 Paney Hill Red Hill Streaky 46 25 3 Island 75 61 3 Bay Eyre 'Paney' Ranges Highway Army 27 Harris Bluff 'Corunna' Training Cape Bauer 39 28 43 Poochera Lake Area Olive Island 61 Iron Knob 33 45 Gilles Corvisart Highway 'Buckleboo' Streaky Bay Lake Gilles 47 Bay Minnipa Pinkawillinie Conservation Park 1 56 17 31 Point Westall 21 Highway Conservation Buckleboo 21 35 43 Eyre Sceale Bay 17 Park Iron Baron 88 Cape Blanche 43 13 27 23 Wudinna 24 24 Port Germein Searcy Bay Kulliparu Kyancutta 18 Whyalla Point Labatt Port Kenny 22 Con.
    [Show full text]