Analysis of Wave Force Data
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
., 1 Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/jpt/article-pdf/22/03/347/2228075/spe-2711-pa.pdf by guest on 23 September 2021 Introduction The design of a structure for the marine environment data were obtained for 4 years during Wave Force is primarily dependent on the prediction of the forces Project I (1954 to 1958). Then in 1960, newer instm- generated by waves in most coastal areas. Morison ments were located in 100 ft of water where additional da?~ ~ew fihtai.nrl frm ‘4 mrwe veatw dmino wave et ai.~ reiated these forces to the kineinatk ‘wavepop- 1!, ““WAA.”W .“. “ . ..”.- J -- . ---= ~ ..-. erties, the water particle velocity and acceleration. The Force Project II (1960 to 1963). These projects were equation is composed of two parts — a drag term and supported by the California Research Co., Shell Oil an inertial term — that are related to the total force Co., and Humble OiI and Refining Co. Pure Oil Co. by means of the drag and inertial force coefficient, and the U. S. Navy entered the program at a later CD and Clf, respectively. Two primary limitations date. A complete description of the installation ap- associated with the Monson equation are: (1) the pears in Ref. 3. poorly defined values of these hydrodynamic force The theoretical determination of the wave particle coefficients for large waves and (2) the dependency velocity and acceleration and the fitting of the meas- on wave theory or theories to describe the kinematic ured data by means of the correlation coefficients water particle velocity and local acceleration. A sec- (CD and C.) in Morison’s equation was done inde- Qndarv, comideration.- —.—-.—— is the change of these wave force pendently by the participants. Shell has analyzed coefficients with changes of the kinematic flow field the measured wave force data differently for each and changes of the pile dimensions. The drag coe5- of the two wave force projects. The same wave cient has been shown to be a function of the Reynolds theories were used to determine the velocity and number for steady fluid flow.2 However, correlation acceleration terms from the measured wave profile of CD with the Reynolds number in an oscillating data; however, the force coefficients were analyzed by n-— 1-=-l-. - ---. --.11.. L,.,....-.l...:.,a q-ha _ _.ahl -e t--hnimux aQ deccrihecl in t&.e noW nds rxeu gfam WY UHUMUMVG. ~ 11=* ~Luu&eaA,. d~erent . ---.--.-l--”, -“ --”------ -_ section Wave clearly show the need for prototype field measure- Force Coefficient Analysis. With these calibrated co- ments of these wave properties in the high Reynolds efficients, Morison’s equation was used to predict the number range. individual wave forces from various large hurricane m. ..=.*7fm. *,,..,- m..-+ll. nrl Wn”$l fmw.p dfifa ~ 11= ~Gb&Da, Ly ~ul “~.” ~1 “Auw a,,= .._.” .V._ __ waves. The relative agreement of the predcted and for large waves to establish the desired correlation observed forces is used as a measure of the degree resulted, in 1954, in the instrumentation of an off- of correctness of the Morison equation and as a meas- ure of the confidence for the prediction of wave forces shore oii piatform in Xi ft of ‘Waki. lX’--”-Vv avG ‘-Jtulu “-”lul&c on a structure. The ctilbrated Morison equation is ●Presently with Ocean Science and Engineering, Inc. then used to determine the design forces for a struc- 1 I Wave profile and wave force data acquired in the Gulf of Mexico from several hurricanes have been analyzed to provide the drag and inertial coeflcients of Morison’s wave force equation. These coefficients are required to help determine design loads for o#shore structures. MARCH, 1970 ~—fl~ 347 ture using the kinematic flow field determined for a as a function of time, thus providing the parameters design hurricane. By using the same technique for of wave height H and period T for a given water the prediction of the design force as for the analysis depth d. Assuming the waves are unidirectional and of the observed force, the chances for error are steady, the kinematic flow field cart then be computed greatly reduced. from the appropriate wave theories and this surface =__nrnfile.—_. Wave Force Theory This correlation technique calibrates Morison’s equation only in the range of wave heights and Morison’s Force Equation periods and wave forces that have been measured for The basic wave force theory used in design of off- certain pile diameters. Therefore, it is desirable to shore stmctures by Shell Oil Co. is the Morison equa- extend the calibration of the wave force coefficients, tion, which gives the total force on a structural CDand CM,to the wave conditions and pile size other member as the sum of the drag and the inertial forces. * than the experimental values. There have been many The Morison equation, expressed in terms of force attempts to correlate CD with such parameters as the per unit length (lb/ft) on a cylindrical pile, is Reynolds numbers, the Froude number, the Keulegan- Carpenter modulus and several other dimensionless Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/jpt/article-pdf/22/03/347/2228075/spe-2711-pa.pdf by guest on 23 September 2021 zD’ au F~ = + CDIUIU + pcJf— — . (1) parameters’ for an oscillating flow, but generally with 4 at poor success. Several of these relationships were in- where vestigated as well as other parameters such as wave height and period. ;~ mass density of sea water, lb ft-4 sees diameter of the cylindrical pile, ft Composite Wave Theories u= horizontal component of velocity, ft see-’ a24/at= horizontal component of local accelera- The other problem raised by the use of the Monson tion, ft see-z equation is the method of determining the kinematic CD= hydrodynamic drag coefficient flow field. Early investigators of wave force theory’ CM= hydrodynamic inertial coefficient quickly realized that no single theory available would properly describe the kinematic flow field for the many With this equation the measured wave force data can variations of wave conditions. These wave conditions be correlated with theoretically predicted wave force have been described by two parameters, the -~ave----- data, provided the kinematic flow field is known. steepness parameter (H/gT’) and the water depth Ideally this flow field would be measured simul- parameter (d/gT’). Consequently, Shell Development taneously with the wave force field for the most accu- Co. has developed numerical wave theory computer rate analysis of CD and CM.Practically, this has not programs to cover the ranges of wave steepness and been done successfully for very large waves (nor was wave characteristics in various water depths. A selec- it accomplished in the two wave force projects). How- tion graph (Fig. 1) displays the various regions of ever, the sea surface profile at a point can be measured applicability of the several wave theories used by Shell 0.03 r /+ = o C2732 I .< wiiv E t+l Hr, = \ 000 g=32 20 F1/Sec2 CHAP PE LEAR NUMERICAL 002 - / H/Hm, = O 675 . m . z & STOKES– 5~h c . I (JO, -: 0 W OEPTH SOLUTIONS) I I I H, HT, = 005 1 c 002 c C)4 c 06 0 08 . d/gT~ Fig. l—Wave theory selection graph. 348 JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY I , as dictated by the dimensionless parameters, H/gT2 u = wave frequency (2zT-1), see-l and d/gT2. ~s does not imply that other wave k = wave number (27rL-’), ft’ theories are not applicable to similar regions. Fig. 1 shows that two forms of the Stokes (1847) wave Vj = velocity constants in Stokes’ iifth order theories, the first order (Airy) theory and the more wave theory complex tifth order theory, were applicable to most of the ranges of these parameters. The ChappelearO Aj = acceleration constants in Stokes’ fifth numerical wave theory and the McCowan’ solitary order wave theory wave theory were used for the extreme conditions of d = dep@ ft very steep waves in deep and shallow water, respec- tively. With the exception of the Airy and McCmvan When x = O (at the wave crest), sin (kjx) = O, and wave theones, the computations in determining z the inertial force term is likewise O. The velocity single set of water particle velocities and accelerations (hence, drag force) is then a maximum, since cos from the theories in Fig. 1 for a given location were kj(0) = 1 at the wave crest. At x = L/2 (at the wave .... —— -.. -L) .:- l.:tT 19) h -1 - n .~A th- fn~p ic amin nearly prohiiiitive untii they were cornpuwr pru- Uuugu], 3UI #b](&/ 6) la W&) v, -- w“ . ..- .“ -~— grammed for rapid compilation. purely drag. The velocity is a maximum in the nega- Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/jpt/article-pdf/22/03/347/2228075/spe-2711-pa.pdf by guest on 23 September 2021 We cannot begin to delve here into these wave tive direction at the trough but not so strong as at the theories, All appear in the literature in great detail. crest since -m, ~....,. +La ~a.r.in WI..+ .f th. Aim wgy~ Au w a Lue Uw v “.+-S . “. -“ . ——., .- , theory. The Stokes fifth or&r theory is described by ; Vi cosh ki (d + q) cos kj(0) > Skjelbreia et al.,’ and the numerical wave theory ap- j=l crest pears in Chappelear.6 A more recent stream function wave theory by Dean’” is also available as it has ; VJcoshkj(d–q)coskj ~ . (3) specific application for the analysis of the kinematic Ij=l ( )1 flow field of an irregular sea. The continuing effort Trough Of many WLIV-..w.. thenri.