DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix-11: Detailed Critical Habitat Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix-11: Detailed Critical Habitat Assessment Morava Corridor Motorway Project Appendix-11: Detailed Critical Habitat Assessment APPENDIX - 11 Detailed Critical Habitat Assessment ESIA Final Report November 2020 SE102-000-ES-REP-00002 1 / 50 Morava Corridor Motorway Project Appendix-11: Detailed Critical Habitat Assessment 1. SCOPE This report relates to the identification and approximate delineation of critical habitat. In accordance with IFC Guidance Note, it identifies which areas are considered as critical habitat regardless of whether or not the project may affect them. This report focuses on the Proposed Motorway route, River Regulation and project facilities. 2. METHODOLOGY Critical habitat is an area which contains features that are essential for the conservation of a species or habitat of conservation concern and may require targeted management and protection. Critical habitat may include an area that is not currently occupied by a species but is necessary for its recovery. The critical habitat definition presented in paragraph 16 of Performance Standard 6 is in line with criteria captured from a range of definitions of priority habitat for biodiversity conservation in use by the conservation community and incorporated in related governmental legislation and regulations. Critical habitats are areas of high biodiversity value that include at least one or more of the five values specified in paragraph 16 of Performance Standard 6 and/or other recognized high biodiversity values. There is no one criterion that is more important than any other for making critical habitat designations or for determining compliance with Performance Standard 6. For ease of reference, these values are referred to as “critical habitat criteria” for the remainder of this document. Each criterion is described in detail in paragraphs GN70–GN83. Critical habitat criteria are as follows and should form the basis of any critical habitat assessment: (GN53) • Criterion 1: Critically Endangered (CR) and/or Endangered (EN) species • Criterion 2: Endemic or restricted-range species • Criterion 3: Migratory or congregatory species • Criterion 4: Highly threatened and/or unique ecosystems • Criterion 5: Key evolutionary processes Projects that are located within internationally and/or nationally recognized areas of high biodiversity value may require a critical habitat assessment. Examples include the following: (GN54) • Areas that meet the criteria of the IUCN’s Protected Area Categories Ia, Ib and II. GN9 • Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs), GN10 which encompass Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs). ESIA Final Report November 2020 SE102-000-ES-REP-00002 2 / 50 Morava Corridor Motorway Project Appendix-11: Detailed Critical Habitat Assessment To facilitate decision-making, numerical thresholds have been defined for the first four critical habitat criteria (i.e., CR/EN species; endemic/restricted-range species; migratory/congregatory species; threatened and unique ecosystems). The thresholds presented in this Guidance Note were obtained from globally standardized numerical thresholds published in the IUCN’s A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas and Red List Categories and Criteria. The thresholds are indicative and serve as a guideline for decision-making only. There is no universally accepted or automatic formula for making determinations on critical habitat. The involvement of external experts and project-specific assessments is of utmost importance, especially when data are limited (as will often be the case). (GN56) For Criterion 5, there are no numerical thresholds. Best available scientific information and expert opinion should be used to guide decision-making with respect to the relative “criticality” of a habitat in these cases. (GN57) 132 terrestrial or aquatic biodiversity features were assessed for critical habitat under the IFC criteria and given in Table 1. ESIA Final Report November 2020 SE102-000-ES-REP-00002 3 / 50 Morava Corridor Motorway Project Appendix-11: Detailed Critical Habitat Assessment Table 1. Critical Habitat Assessment Species / Global feature and population Distribution Assessment status (global trend and regional) Criterion 1: Critically Endangered / Endangered Species (The species included in the assessment consist of the strictly protected species according to the National Legislation.) a) Areas that support globally important concentrations of an IUCN Red-listed EN or CR species (≥ 0.5% of the global population AND ≥ 5 reproductive unitsGN16 of a CR or EN species). b) Areas that support globally important concentrations of an IUCN Red-listed Vulnerable (VU) species, the loss of which would result in the change of the IUCN Red List status to EN or CR and meet the thresholds in GN72(a). c) As appropriate, areas containing important concentrations of a nationally or regionally listed EN or CR species According to the studies conducted during the ESIA process and according to the EIAs prepared for the Morava Motorway Project, based on the decision of the Institute for Nature Protection of Serbia, It was determined that the area foreseen for the Motorway, is not located in "protected areas for which protection procedure has been carried out or initiated”, “Ecological Network of the Republic of Serbia ”, and “recorded natural assets”. It is also the habitat of several species of strictly protected and protected species of fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. No endemic or relict species were found. The animal and plant species that inhabit this area are relatively widespread in the territory of Serbia, so the area does not represent a vital part of the habitat for their survival or overall conservation status. *Potentially Affected Landscape in this project is determined as West Morava region (from Pojate to Preljina) is approximately 1000 km2 Flora Nuphar lutea Population status Widely distribute in Albania; Austria; Belarus; Belgium; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; Widely distributed species in Eurasia and of this species is Croatia; Czechia; Denmark; Estonia; Finland; France (France (mainland)); Germany; Serbia. Stable and “LC Greece (Greece (mainland)); Hungary; Iran, Islamic Republic of; Ireland; Isle of Man; Italy These species are not concentrated in the (Sardegna, Italy (mainland)); Kazakhstan; Latvia; Liechtenstein; Lithuania; Luxembourg; West Morava Region. Moldova; Montenegro; Netherlands; North Macedonia; Norway; Palestine, State of; Poland; Portugal (Portugal (mainland)); Romania; Russian Federation (Northwest Due to the wide geographic extent of the European Russia, North European Russia, Central European Russia, East European species, landscape unlikely to support ≥ 0.5% Russia, Kaliningrad); Serbia; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain (Spain (mainland)); Sweden; of the global population. Not triggering Switzerland; Syrian Arab Republic; Turkey (Turkey-in-Europe, Turkey-in-Asia); Ukraine; Criterion 1 United Kingdom (Great Britain, Northern Ireland). ESIA Final Report November 2020 SE102-000-ES-REP-00002 4 / 50 Morava Corridor Motorway Project Appendix-11: Detailed Critical Habitat Assessment Species / Global feature and population Distribution Assessment status (global trend and regional) Invertebrates Papilio Population status Widely distribute in Albania; Andorra; Austria; Belarus; Belgium; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Widely distributed species in Europe and machaon of this species is Bulgaria; Croatia; Cyprus; Czechia; Estonia; Finland; France; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Serbia. Stable and “LC” Italy; Latvia; Liechtenstein; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Malta; Moldova; Montenegro; These species are not concentrated in the Netherlands; North Macedonia; Norway; Poland; Portugal; Romania; Russian Federation; West Morava Region. Serbia; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; Turkey; Ukraine; United Kingdom. Due to the wide geographic extent of the species, landscape unlikely to support ≥ 0.5% of the global population. Not triggering Criterion 1 Pieris brassicae Population status Widely distribute in Albania; Andorra; Austria; Belarus; Belgium; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Widely distributed species in Europe and of this species is Bulgaria; Croatia; Cyprus; Czechia; Denmark; Estonia; Finland; France; Germany; Greece; Serbia. Stable and “LC” Hungary; Ireland; Italy; Latvia; Liechtenstein; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Malta; Moldova; These species are not concentrated in the Montenegro; Netherlands; North Macedonia; Norway; Poland; Portugal; Romania; Russian West Morava Region. Federation; Serbia; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; Turkey; Ukraine; United Kingdom. Due to the wide geographic extent of the species, landscape unlikely to support ≥ 0.5% of the global population. Not triggering Criterion 1 Amphibians Salamandra Population status Widely distribute in Albania; Andorra; Austria; Belgium; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; Widely distributed species in Europe and salamandra of this species Croatia; Czechia; France; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Italy; Liechtenstein; Luxembourg; Serbia. Decreasing and Montenegro; Netherlands; North Macedonia; Poland; Portugal; Romania; San Marino; These species are not concentrated in the “LC” Serbia; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; Switzerland; Ukraine. West Morava Region. Due to the wide geographic extent of the species, landscape unlikely to support ≥ 0.5% of the global population. Not triggering Criterion 1 ESIA Final Report November 2020 SE102-000-ES-REP-00002 5 / 50 Morava Corridor Motorway Project Appendix-11: Detailed Critical Habitat Assessment Species / Global feature and population
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cobitis Elongata, Heckel & Kner, 1858
    Molekularna ekologija velikog vijuna (Cobitis elongata, Heckel & Kner, 1858) Nemec, Petra Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2019 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:217:053268 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-10-02 Repository / Repozitorij: Repository of Faculty of Science - University of Zagreb Sveuĉilište u Zagrebu Prirodoslovno-matematiĉki fakultet Biološki odsjek Petra Nemec MOLEKULARNA EKOLOGIJA VELIKOG VIJUNA (Cobitis elongata Heckel & Kner, 1858) Diplomski rad Zagreb, 2019. Ovaj rad, izraĊen u Zoologijskom zavodu Biološkog odsjeka Prirodoslovno-matematiĉkog fakulteta Sveuĉilišta u Zagrebu, pod vodstvom doc. dr. sc. Ivane Buj, predan je na ocjenu Biološkom odsjeku Prirodoslovno-matematiĉkog fakulteta Sveuĉilišta u Zagrebu radi stjecanja zvanja magistra ekologije i zaštite prirode. Zahvala Zahvaljujem svojoj mentorici doc. dr. sc. Ivani Buj na stručnom vodstvu i prenesenom znanju, usmjeravanju i pomoći, strpljenju te vremenu koje mi je poklonila tijekom izrade ovog diplomskog rada. Hvala što ste vjerovali da ja to mogu! Hvala mojoj obitelji bez koje ovo sve ne bi bilo moguće. Hvala vam svima na velikoj potpori i brizi što ste me bodrili i bili uz mene tijekom mojih uspona, ali i padova. Najveća hvala mami i tati na bezuvjetnoj ljubavi, podršci, a najviše na svim odricanjima i nesebičnom trudu koji su uložili u moje obrazovanje. Zahvaljujem svim svojim prijateljima i kolegama s kojima sam provela najbolje studentske dane. Hvala vam na svakom zajedničkom trenutku, zabavnim druženjima, razgovorima te učenju do dugo u noć. Hvala što ste mi život u drugom gradu učinili ljepšim.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Position of the Fish Genus Ellopostoma (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) Using Molecular Genetic Data
    157 Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 157-162, 2 figs., June 2009 © 2009 by Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, Germany – ISSN 0936-9902 Phylogenetic position of the fish genus Ellopostoma (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) using molecular genetic data Jörg Bohlen* and Vendula Šlechtová* We investigated the phylogenetic position of Ellopostoma based on nuclear sequence data (RAG-1 gene). Ellopo- stoma is a member of the superfamily Cobitoidea (loaches) of Cypriniformes, but does not belong to any of the currently recognised families. It represents an independent lineage, recognised as a distinct new family Ellopo- stomatidae, characterized by a squarish and oblique snout, a minute protrusible mouth, a single pair of barbels, large eyes and 35-38 pharyngeal teeth. Introduction middle stretches of the Kapuas River in western Borneo. It is only in 1976 that the species was With about 3800 recognised species, the freshwa- collected again, also in the Kapuas (Roberts, 1989). ter fish order Cypriniformes (Osteichthyes: Tele- Kottelat (1989) recorded the presence of an un- ostei) is one of the largest recognised to date named Ellopostoma from the Malay Peninsula among vertebrates. It is divided into two main [Tapi River, Thailand], later described by Tan & lineages, the superfamilies Cyprinoidea (carps, Lim (2002) as E. mystax. Kottelat & Widjanarti minnows and related fishes) and Cobitoidea (2005) provide additional records of E. megalo- (loaches and related fishes) (Nelson, 2006). With- mycter, also in the Kapuas drainage. in Cobitoidea seven lineages are recognizable Because of its unique morphological features, (called families by e. g., Šlechtová et al., 2007; Chen the phylogenetic position of Ellopostoma has been & Mayden, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • CBD First National Report
    FIRST NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY July 2010 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 4 2. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Geographic Profile .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate Profile ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Population Profile ................................................................................................. 7 2.4 Economic Profile .................................................................................................. 7 3 THE BIODIVERSITY OF SERBIA .............................................................................. 8 3.1 Overview......................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Ecosystem and Habitat Diversity .................................................................... 8 3.3 Species Diversity ............................................................................................ 9 3.4 Genetic Diversity ............................................................................................. 9 3.5 Protected Areas .............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe
    Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe Von der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der RWTH Aachen University zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Lara Ibrahim, M.Sc. aus Mazeraat Assaf, Libanon Berichter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Andreas Schäffer Prof. Dr. Christoph Schäfers Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 30. Juli 2015 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Universitätsbibliothek online verfügbar Erklärung Ich versichere, dass ich diese Doktorarbeit selbständig und nur unter Verwendung der angegebenen Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Weiterhin versichere ich, die aus benutzten Quellen wörtlich oder inhaltlich entnommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht zu haben. Lara Ibrahim Aachen, am 18 März 2015 Zusammenfassung Die Zulassung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft verlangt unter anderem eine Abschätzung des Risikos für Organismen in der Umwelt, die nicht Ziel der Anwendung sind. Unvertretbare Auswirkungen auf den Naturhalt sollen vermieden werden. Die ökologische Risikoanalyse stellt die dafür benötigten Informationen durch eine Abschätzung der Exposition der Organismen und der sich daraus ergebenden Effekte bereit. Die Effektabschätzung beruht dabei hauptsächlich auf standardisierten ökotoxikologischen Tests im Labor mit wenigen, oft nicht einheimischen Stellvertreterarten. In diesen Tests werden z. B. Effekte auf das Überleben, das Wachstum und/oder die Reproduktion von Fischen bei verschiedenen Konzentrationen der Testsubstanz gemessen und Endpunkte wie die LC50 (Lethal Concentrations for 50%) oder eine NOEC (No Observed Effect Concentration, z. B. für Wachstum oder Reproduktionsparameter) abgeleitet. Für Fische und Wirbeltiere im Allgemeinen beziehen sich die spezifischen Schutzziele auf das Überleben von Individuen und die Abundanz und Biomasse von Populationen.
    [Show full text]
  • PHYLOGENY and ZOOGEOGRAPHY of the SUPERFAMILY COBITOIDEA (CYPRINOIDEI, Title CYPRINIFORMES)
    PHYLOGENY AND ZOOGEOGRAPHY OF THE SUPERFAMILY COBITOIDEA (CYPRINOIDEI, Title CYPRINIFORMES) Author(s) SAWADA, Yukio Citation MEMOIRS OF THE FACULTY OF FISHERIES HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY, 28(2), 65-223 Issue Date 1982-03 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/21871 Type bulletin (article) File Information 28(2)_P65-223.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP PHYLOGENY AND ZOOGEOGRAPHY OF THE SUPERFAMILY COBITOIDEA (CYPRINOIDEI, CYPRINIFORMES) By Yukio SAWADA Laboratory of Marine Zoology, Faculty of Fisheries, Bokkaido University Contents page I. Introduction .......................................................... 65 II. Materials and Methods ............... • • . • . • . • • . • . 67 m. Acknowledgements...................................................... 70 IV. Methodology ....................................•....•.........•••.... 71 1. Systematic methodology . • • . • • . • • • . 71 1) The determinlttion of polarity in the morphocline . • . 72 2) The elimination of convergence and parallelism from phylogeny ........ 76 2. Zoogeographical methodology . 76 V. Comparative Osteology and Discussion 1. Cranium.............................................................. 78 2. Mandibular arch ...................................................... 101 3. Hyoid arch .......................................................... 108 4. Branchial apparatus ...................................•..••......••.. 113 5. Suspensorium.......................................................... 120 6. Pectoral
    [Show full text]
  • On the Origin of the Balkan Penins8la Salmonids
    Ribarstvo, 61, 2003, (4), 147174 S. B. Georgiev: The Balkan Peninsula Salmonids ISSN 1330061X UDK: 597.553.2(497) CODEN RIBAEG Review article ON THE ORIGIN OF THE BALKAN PENINSULA SALMONIDS S. B. Georgiev 6XPPDU\ This paper puts forward the knowledge of the immigration itineraries of the ancestors of five extant salmonid species on Balkan Peninsula which are the following: Acantholingua ohridana (Steindachner, 1892), Hucho hucho (Lin- naeus, 1758), Salmo trutta Linnaeus, 1758, Salmothymus obtusirostris Heckel, 1851 and Thymallus thymallus (Linnaeus, 1758). The thesis for the migration itineraries is based on the anatomical, molecular and zoogeographical facts recently published. These latest facts complement or reject the previous thesis that considered the origin of separate species, which in this paper are analyzed together. A new position on the origin of some S. trutta populations inhabiting the Mediterranean Sea watershed is proposed. The new thesis is that they did not inhabit it from the west, through the Atlantic Ocean and Gibraltar, but from the North, through the branches of the former Sarmatian Sea, using the continental way. A. ohridana and S. obtusirostris, the only endemic Balkanean salmonids, have developed here from the mutual ancestor with the extant Siberian Brachymystax lenok (Pallas, 1773). This ancestor came first, together with the S. trutta lineage known as -marmorata. Using the same migration way, the T. thymallus population of So~a River, the NorthWest boundary of Balkan Peninsula remained restricted at that corner of Adriatic Sea watershed. In the Black Sea watershed (the Danube River flow extension on Balkan Peninsula) the distribution of T. thymallus coincides with the distribution of H.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Position of the Genus Bibarba As Revealed from Molecular Genetic Data (Teleostei: Cobitidae)
    297 Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 297-304, 5 figs., 1 tab., February 2020 © 2020 by Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, Germany – ISSN 0936-9902 LSID: http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5380FE17-1144-4AD6-A3A1-5762553CC37F DOI: http://doi.org/10.23788/IEF-1099 Published 15 May 2019 Phylogenetic position of the genus Bibarba as revealed from molecular genetic data (Teleostei: Cobitidae) Jörg Bohlen*, Fan Li** and Vendula Šlechtová* Phylogenetically, the family Cobitidae consists of an assemblage of lineages that are referred to as ‘southern line- ages’, out of which stems a monophyletic bunch of lineages that is referred to as ‘Northern clade’. Up to now, 17 of the 21 valid genera have been included into genetic phylogenies. The present phylogenetic study analyses the only two known species of Bibarba using nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Both species together formed a monophyletic lineage that is sister to the Northern clade of Cobitidae, but well-separated from the four other major lineages within the Northern clade. The results support the validity of the genus and show it to represent a major lineage on its own. The morphological synapomorphy of the northern clade is in the sexual dimorphism, with males bearing an ossified structure (lamina circularis or scale of Canestrini) on the second branched pectoral-fin ray in males. Bibarba was reported to have such structure on the third instead of second fin ray, but our observations reveal the presence of two lamina circularis, one on the second and one on the third fin ray (character doubling).
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic List of the Romanian Vertebrate Fauna
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © Décembre Vol. LIII pp. 377–411 «Grigore Antipa» 2010 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-010-0028-1 SYSTEMATIC LIST OF THE ROMANIAN VERTEBRATE FAUNA DUMITRU MURARIU Abstract. Compiling different bibliographical sources, a total of 732 taxa of specific and subspecific order remained. It is about the six large vertebrate classes of Romanian fauna. The first class (Cyclostomata) is represented by only four species, and Pisces (here considered super-class) – by 184 taxa. The rest of 544 taxa belong to Tetrapoda super-class which includes the other four vertebrate classes: Amphibia (20 taxa); Reptilia (31); Aves (382) and Mammalia (110 taxa). Résumé. Cette contribution à la systématique des vertébrés de Roumanie s’adresse à tous ceux qui sont intéressés par la zoologie en général et par la classification de ce groupe en spécial. Elle représente le début d’une thème de confrontation des opinions des spécialistes du domaine, ayant pour but final d’offrir aux élèves, aux étudiants, aux professeurs de biologie ainsi qu’à tous ceux intéressés, une synthèse actualisée de la classification des vertébrés de Roumanie. En compilant différentes sources bibliographiques, on a retenu un total de plus de 732 taxons d’ordre spécifique et sous-spécifique. Il s’agît des six grandes classes de vertébrés. La première classe (Cyclostomata) est représentée dans la faune de Roumanie par quatre espèces, tandis que Pisces (considérée ici au niveau de surclasse) l’est par 184 taxons. Le reste de 544 taxons font partie d’une autre surclasse (Tetrapoda) qui réunit les autres quatre classes de vertébrés: Amphibia (20 taxons); Reptilia (31); Aves (382) et Mammalia (110 taxons).
    [Show full text]
  • Loaches of the Genus Cobitis and Related Genera Biology, Systematics, Genetics, Distribution, Ecology and Conservation
    3rd International Conference Loaches of the Genus Cobitis and Related Genera Biology, Systematics, Genetics, Distribution, Ecology and Conservation Šibenik, Croatia 24–29 September 2006 Organized by Croatia Ichtythyological Society and Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb Edited by Stanislav LUSK, Ivana BUJ and Milorad MRAKOVČIĆ 1 PREFACE The biology of loaches (in the broader sense of the term) has already been discussed at three international conferences. After two previous meetings (the first in Brno in 1999 and second in Olsztyn in 2002), the third conference took place in Šibenik, Croatia, in 2006. The continuing interest of the some 50 participants from Europe and Asia suggests that the problem of loaches of the genus Cobitis and related genera is still interesting and attractive. At each Cobitis conference, alongside more experienced scientists that have already accomplished a great deal in revealing the biology of loaches, new, younger researchers were amazed with this group of fish and continue to investigate them. Certainly, one could ask why similar topical activities, such as those pertaining to Chondrostoma, Barbus, or Gobio, ended after one or two meetings. The answer is that the scientific importance of the problem of loaches is distinctly wider, more complex, and far from being exhausted. In Europe, intense investigations into this topic have been underway for not longer than ten years or so, and the application of genetical and karyological methods has induced substantial changes into the previous taxonomy and systematics of the loaches. The polyploidy of some taxa, the atypical reproduction and the ensuing presence of hybrid complexes within the ranges of ‘pure’ species present an interesting and important ‘natural experimental base’.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1: Field Protocol
    Annex 1: Field protocol Annex 1-Table 1: Fish data Fish data Date (dd/mm/yyyy) Site code Sampling method Site name Sampling location Name of watercourse Main river region XY co-ordinates GPS co-ordinates Longitude Transect length [m] Latitude Fished area [m2] Altitude[m] Wetted width [m] Fish data Fish species number of specimen number of specimen length ≤150 mm length >150 mm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Annex 1-Table 2: Abiotic and method data Reference fields Site code Date dd/mm/yyyy Site name Name of watercourse or River name River region XY co-ordinates or longitude, latitude GPS co-ordinates Altitude m Sampling location Main channel/Backwaters/Mixed Sampling method Boat/Wading Fished area m2 Wetted width m Abiotic variables Altitude m Lakes upstream affecting Yes / No the site Distance from source km Flow regime Permanent / Summer dry/Winter dry/Intermittent Geomophology Naturally constrained no modification/ Braided/Sinuous/Meand regular/Meand tortuous Former floodplain No/Small/Medium/Large/Some waterbodies remaining/ Water source type Glacial/Nival/Pluvial/Groundwater Former sediment size Organic/Silt/Sand/ Gravel-Pebble-Cobble/Boulder-Rock Upstream drainage area km2 Distance from source km River slope m/km (‰) Mean air temperature Celsius (°C) Annex 1-Table 3: Human impact data (optional) Site code hChemical data Name watercourse Oxygen (mg/l or % saturation) XYZ co-ordinates or X:……………………(N) Conductivity (mS/cm) longitude latitude altitude Y:……………………(E) Z :…………………….m
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography and an Index List on Parasites and Parasitic Diseases of Fish in Northern Europe
    A bibliography and an index list on parasites and parasitic diseases of fish in Northern Europe OLEG PUGACHEV Zoological Institute Russian Academy of Scienses St.Petersburg, Russia HANS-PETER FAGERHOLM Institute of Parasitology Department of Biology Åbo Akademi University Åbo, Finland & Parasitology Laboratory Department of Pathology National Veterinary and Food Research Institutue, Helsinki, Finland ISBN 951-650-506-6 1 INTRODUCTION In 1988 a symposium on "Parasites of freshwater fishes of North-West Europe" was arranged in Petrozavodsk in connection with a co-operation project between Russian (then Soviet) and Finnish scientists. During the meeting it was stated that it would be of importance to compile literature data from the northern Europe on parasites and parasitic diseases of fish. One reason for this is the fact that in countries outside Russia, the Russian literature, due to the language, is usually not well known. Also some early, especially Scandinavian, investigations have remained unnoticed as they were published in a Nordic language only. A bibliography on fish parasites and diseases, covering the geographical area in question, is likely to be useful today as the interest in fish parasitology has increased substantially in recent years. It is, in addition, feasible to produce such a work now because of the new efficient means to deal with bibliographic information given by present day computers. We hope that the bibliography will be of use to scientists and students alike. As the titles of publications originally given in Russian or Nordic languages have been translated into English we hope that this will promote the availability of this literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Fishery and Aquaculture Sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Analysis of the Fishery and Aquaculture Sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina EU funded project “Preparation of IPARD Forest and Fisheries Sector Reviews in Bosnia and Herzegovina” Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO, 2015 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.
    [Show full text]