DOCSLIB.ORG

Questions to the Mayor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Questions to the Mayor Appendix 5 Questions to the Mayor 24 February, 2020 WRITTEN ANSWER REPORT Subject: MQT on 24 February, 2020 Report of: Executive Director of Secretariat Safeguarding Wharves Question No: 2020/0347 Caroline Pidgeon Please set out the evidence in relation to each of the eight wharves that have seen their safeguarding directions removed in Mayoral Decision 2569 and set out how this decision fully complies with Policy S1 15 of the draft London and 7.26 of the current London Plan, which requires safeguarded wharves to be used for the purposes of waterborne freight handling, with any redevelopment for other land only being acceptable when the wharf is no long viable or capable of being made viable for waterborne freight handling. Answer for Safeguarding Wharves The Mayor Last updated: 27 February, 2020 Officers are drafting a response London Living Wage Question No: 2020/0348 Caroline Pidgeon Further to data provided in response to Question 2019/4021 please provide the most recent data for both the total number and proportion of jobs in Greater London paying less than the London Living Wage. London Living Wage The Mayor Last updated: 27 February, 2020 In 2019 the ONS Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings reported that 839,000 or 19.8 per cent of employee jobs pay below the London Living Wage. The Mayor urges businesses to voluntarily sign up to paying the London Living Wage. It is the right thing to do to ensure that hardworking Londoners are rewarded with fair pay. It can also make business sense as London Living Wage employers can see improvements in productivity, staff morale and retention as a result of employees feeling valued. Please see the attached table which sets out the number and proportion of employee jobs paid held by those working in London aged 18 or over that are paid below the London Living Wage between 2005 and 2019 using the ONS Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings. Number of employee jobs below Percentage of employee jobs below Year the London Living Wage the London Living Wage 2019 839000 19.8 2018 871000 20.5 2017 814000 19.4 2016 802000 19.5 2015 798000 20.0 2014 755000 19.1 2013 669000 17.4 2012 611000 16.7 2011 542000 14.8 2010 471000 13.0 2009 454000 12.8 2008 469000 12.8 2007 446000 12.7 2006 406000 12.0 2005 446000 13.3 Please note that these estimates cover only employee jobs i.e. self-employed jobs are not covered. The estimates are produced using the methodology recommended for living wage estimates, as explained here: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworking hours/methodologies/calculatingtheproportionofemployeejobsunderthelivingwageamethod ologyarticle Bus usage (1) Question No: 2020/0349 Caroline Pidgeon What is TfL’s estimate of the required increase in bus usage that would be required to ensure that your Transport Strategy objective is met of 80 per cent of journeys being made by active transport or public transport by 2041? Answer for Bus usage (1) The Mayor Last updated: 27 February, 2020 Officers are drafting a response Bus usage (2) Question No: 2020/0350 Caroline Pidgeon According to Department for Transport statistics published on the 22 January 2020 the number of local bus passenger journeys in England was 4.30 billion in the year ending September 2019, a 0.4% decrease when compared with a year earlier. However, in London bus use decreased by 0.8% in the latest year. What are the reasons for the fall in bus usage being faster in London than the rest of England? Bus usage (2) The Mayor Last updated: 27 February, 2020 In 2018/19, 2.2 billion bus journeys were made in London, half the national total. Although year on year demand declined by 0.8 per cent, bus use per head of population remained at over five times the level of use in the rest of England. Figures on bus use should be considered alongside travel data on other active, efficient and sustainable modes including Underground, rail, walking and cycling, usage of which increased in 2018.. Bus use is driven by a number of factors including economic growth, service levels, fares, operational performance and the availability of alternative travel options. We believe that some of the factors that accounted for the decline in bus use include people transferring from buses to walking, cycling and rail modes as enhancements such as line upgrades and Night Tube have come on stream. Traffic speeds in London have declined from 9.7mph in 2012/13 to 9.3mph. This aligns to an increase in the number of private hire vehicles and delivery vans; recent data suggests that private hire vehicles could account for 15 per cent of car traffic in London and 40 per cent of car traffic at certain times in central London, while light goods vehicle kilometres have increased by 16 per cent in the last four years. Since July 2019, seven new bus routes have been introduced in addition to a large number of outer London enhancements. It will take some time for these service changes to build demand from new routes and enhancements and be reflected in bus passenger journeys. Fatigue and Bus Driver Working Hours Question No: 2020/0351 Caroline Pidgeon A year ago in response to Question 2019/2084 you stated “London’s bus network is the most heavily monitored in the UK with respect to driver hours and I am satisfied that London bus drivers are not working excessively long hours.” Given the findings of the Loughborough University Report published in August 2019 and Unite the Union’s Consultative Ballot about Fatigue held on 7 Feb 2020, are you “still satisfied that London Bus Drivers are not working excessively long hours”? If so, please provide evidence to support your statement. Fatigue and Bus Driver Working Hours The Mayor Last updated: 27 February, 2020 As mentioned in my response toMayor’s Question 2019/2084, bus drivers’ hours are subject to legislation which helps avoid the risk of long continuous shifts and ensure suitable breaks. All bus operators must comply with these requirements as part of their operator licences. The Traffic Commissioner can investigate any concerns and revoke or restrict their licences if significant breaches are evident. Further monitoring by Transport for London (TfL) helps support this legislative compliance framework. The Loughborough University research published on TfL’s website detailed factors that may contribute to driver fatigue. TfL is now working with operators to take forward a programme to tackle the root causes and reduce fatigue as much as possible. First Group’s Failure to Approve TfL Fatigue Management Audit IA 17780 Question No: 2020/0352 Caroline Pidgeon In the documents contained in your delayed response to Question 2019/8811 there is a minute (page 83) which indicates Fatigue Audit IA 17780 was never approved by Tram Operations Limited. How is it possible that a TfL contractor which has been involved a catastrophic incident involving fatigued driving can refuse to approve a TfL Internal Audit which found that improvements on fatigue management were urgent and necessary? Answer for First Group’s Failure to Approve TfL Fatigue Management Audit IA 17780 The Mayor Last updated: 27 February, 2020 Officers are drafting a response 2019 Quarterly Bus Safety Data Question No: 2020/0353 Caroline Pidgeon In response to Question 2020/0012 TfL has published bus safety data for Quarter 2 and Quarter 3, but the new data is in an entirely different format and lacks the granularity of the previous 21 Quarters of published data. How is removing the name of the bus operator involved, the Borough in which it took place, the bus route and a host of important details about the victim and the mode of transport an “upgrade” that improves ”timeliness and accuracy in the long term”? When will TfL replace the Q2 and Q3 Quarterly data with data with the same format and granularity of the previous 21 Quarterly reports? Answer for 2019 Quarterly Bus Safety Data The Mayor Last updated: 27 February, 2020 Officers are drafting a response 2014 Data Missing from Bus Safety Data Release Question No: 2020/0354 Caroline Pidgeon On TfL’s bus data page why does the bus safety data release only include data from Quarter 1 in 2015? When will 2014’s Quarterly data be added to this data set? Answer for 2014 Data Missing from Bus Safety Data Release The Mayor Last updated: 27 February, 2020 Officers are drafting a response Overseas car drivers facing fines for entering the Low Emission Zone (1) Question No: 2020/0355 Caroline Pidgeon The LEZ is mostly aimed at lorries and vans which, if not compliant with the rules, are charged £100 a day. If the vehicle is from outside the UK and not registered with TfL beforehand I understand the fee is £200 a day. If it is not paid, it jumps to £500, then escalates to £750. On top of that, there are extra fees for the debt collectors. Will you investigate whether information about escalating fines is correctly communicated by TfL on its website and whether consideration is given to providing information in different languages? Will you also investigate whether accurate information is provided relating to cars which on some occasions are included? Answer for Overseas car drivers facing fines for entering the Low Emission Zone (1) The Mayor Last updated: 27 February, 2020 Officers are drafting a response Overseas car drivers facing fines for entering the Low Emission Zone (2) Question No: 2020/0356 Caroline Pidgeon To ensure the highest level of compliance with the LEZ and to avoid overseas visitors to London not mistakenly facing excessive fines and harming the reputation of London,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consultation Report March 2016
    Park Lane coach parking Consultation report March 2016 Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 2 1 Background ................................................................................................................ 3 2 The consultation ......................................................................................................... 4 3 Overview of consultation responses ............................................................................ 6 4 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders ........................................... 7 5 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 8 Appendix A – Copy of the consultation material .................................................................... 9 Appendix B – letter distribution area .................................................................................... 11 Appendix C – List of stakeholders consulted ....................................................................... 12 Appendix D – List of themes raised during consultation ....................................................... 18 Appendix E – response to issues raised .............................................................................. 19 Executive Summary About the consultation: In November 2015 we consulted on proposals to introduce an additional 45 metres of coach parking on the north side of Park
    [Show full text]
  • Margarethe Theseira POTENTIAL
    TRADING PLACES: MAXIMISING LONDON’S EXPORTS Theseira Margarethe POTENTIAL TRADING PLACES: MAXIMISING LONDON’S EXPORTS POTENTIAL Margarethe Theseira Published by Centre for London, November 2014 Open Access. Some rights reserved. As the publisher of this work, Centre for London wants to encourage the circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written permission. This is subject to the terms of the Centre for London licence. Its main conditions are: · Centre for London and the author(s) are credited · This summary and the address www.centreforlondon.org are displayed · The text is not altered and is used in full · The work is not resold · A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to Centre for London. You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other than those covered by the licence. Centre for London gratefully acknowledges the work of Creative Commons in inspiring our approach to copyright. To find out more go to www.creativecommons.org Published by: Centre for London 2014 © Centre for London. Some rights reserved. The Exchange 28 London Bridge Street London, SE1 9SG T: 020 3102 3767 [email protected] www.centreforlondon.org Company Number: 8414909 Charity Number: 1151435 Typeset by Soapbox, www.soapbox.co.uk Centre for London is a politically independent, not‑for‑profit think tank focused on the big challenges facing London.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FUTURE of SMART Harnessing Digital Innovation to Make London the Best City in the World UPDATE REPORT of the SMART LONDON PLAN (2013)
    THE FUTURE OF SMART Harnessing digital innovation to make London the best city in the world UPDATE REPORT OF THE SMART LONDON PLAN (2013) MARCH 2016 THE FUTURE OF SMART: UPDATE REPORT OF THE SMART LONDON PLAN COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority March 2016 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Cover: KPMG Data Observatory © Data Science Institute, Imperial College London 3 railways’ expansion as London doubled MAYOR’S in size in the space of just 30 years. Today, as we plan for over 10 million FOREWORD citizens in 2036, London is again showing how the power of data and technology can help support growth. Our tech industry is renowned for its innovation and entrepreneurial energy. That is why investment in the sector is so high – ten times more than just five years ago. We have been working hard at City Hall to open up London’s data and build new tools to see how to best deal with our growing capital. Working closely with Londoners, industry and the Smart London Board, we are doing all we can to ensure London takes advantage of the opportunities presented London is a digital world leader. For by technology – both now and in the future. some, innovation in technology is about I would like to give a special thanks to the sheer speed and amount of data we the Smart London Board for building and carry with us in our smartphones. Yet it keeping the momentum going.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study City Information Centre Mobile Working
    01 Case Study City Information Centre Mobile Working City Information Centre Street Guides City Information Centre Mobile Working | Case Study | 02 The City Information Centre’s (CIC) outreach activities aligns with VisitEngland’s Strategic Framework Objective 4, to facilitate greater engagement between the visitor and the experience. It also contributes to VisitEngland’s Destination Management Action Plan by helping to ensure the availability of world class, tailored information at every stage of the visitor journey and supporting 5% growth, year-on-year in the England tourism market by 2020. In the run up to the 2012 Games, the City Information Centre The CIC was also aware that as the only official tourist became increasingly aware of the requirement to deliver information centre in central London and the only one visitor information to people where and when they needed it, promoting wider London and national product, it was the rather than expecting them to search out the Centre. In 2012, capital’s expert for visitor information and there was a real this was on-street at the major events the City was hosting. opportunity to shine. A previous local volunteer scheme which provided information The solution lay in the asset that the City of London helpers on-street (the SquareMilers) did not offer a feasible Corporation (CoL) has in its staff. The CIC - which is provided solution at the time, as the City has a low resident population by CoL - has only a small staff, but the wider organisation (9k) and a large Monday to Friday working one (380k). employs some 3,000+ across its departments and functions Potential volunteers from various communities which had (including the City of London Police).
    [Show full text]
  • West End Commission Final Report April 2013
    West End Commission Final Report April 2013 WEST END COMMISSION Contents Foreword from the Chair 03 Summary of recommendations 04 About the Commission 09 About the West End 15 Governance and Leadership 26 Growth 35 • Transport 36 • Non-transport infrastructure 43 • Business 46 Place 51 • Crime, safety, night-time economy and licensing 52 • Environment 56 • Heritage and culture 59 • Marketing and promotion 61 People 63 • Housing 64 • Employment and skills 68 Annex 1: Primary data sources 71 Annex 2: Acknowledgements 71 Foreword from the Chair I have been a passionate promoter of cities as engines of national growth throughout my career. When I was invited to chair the independent West End Commission, I saw it as an opportunity to learn more myself about what makes successful places tick, but also to create a platform for serious debate to support the long-term success of a key national asset. This report is the culmination of many months of hard work by a number of people who have given up their time freely to listen, learn and discuss how the West End can respond to the challenges it faces, so that the area remains an attractive place to live and work and in addition, achieves world class excellence in corporate, visitor and enterprise activities. Fiscal restraint is a challenge for many places and not just the West End. So is the co-ordination of public services. What is different in the West End is not just the scale of the challenges, but also the need to tackle effectively the externalities which are associated with success.
    [Show full text]
  • London & Partners Evaluation Methodology Study
    Working Paper 61 London & Partners Evaluation Methodology Study Brian Smith and Elisa Conti (London & Partners) July 2014 London & Partners Evaluation Methodology Study Working Paper 61 copyright Greater London Authority July 2014 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queens Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk Tel 020 7983 4922 Minicom 020 7983 4000 ISBN 978-1-84781-577-4 Cover photograph © Daryl Rozario For more information about this publication, please contact: GLA Economics Tel 020 7983 4922 Email [email protected] GLA Economics provides expert advice and analysis on London’s economy and the economic issues facing the capital. Data and analysis from GLA Economics form a basis for the policy and investment decisions facing the Mayor of London and the GLA group. GLA Economics uses a wide range of information and data sourced from third party suppliers within its analysis and reports. GLA Economics cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or timeliness of this information and data. The GLA will not be liable for any losses suffered or liabilities incurred by a party as a result of that party relying in any way on the information contained in this report. London & Partners Evaluation Methodology Study Working Paper 61 Contents Executive summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Destination London: the Expansion of the Visitor Economy
    CHAPTER 1 Destination London: An Expanding Visitor Economy Andrew Smith Introduction No city in the world is better covered by literature – fictional and non-fictional – than London. From Pepys, via Dickens, to Ackroyd, London has benefited from a series of talented historians, novelists and commentators who have provided detailed accounts of the city’s condition. In the past few years a new tranche of books has been published on the contemporary character of the UK capital: with Anna Minton’s Big Capital, Rowan Moore’s Slow Burn City, Ben Judah’s This is London and Iain Sinclair’s The Last London notable examples. One thing that unites these otherwise excellent accounts is the conspicuous absence of discussions about the city’s visitor economy. This is a notable omission, given the scale and significance of tourism in London. Over the years, the city has earned various nicknames that purport to represent its essential nature: ‘the great wen’; ‘the big smoke’; ‘the city of villages’. But the epithet that perhaps best represents contemporary London might be: ‘the city of tourists’ or Destination London. London hosts a very significant visitor economy and overnight visitors contribute approximately £14.9 billion of expenditure to the city every year How to cite this book chapter: Smith, A. 2019. Destination London: An Expanding Visitor Economy. In: Smith, A. and Graham, A. (eds.) Destination London: The Expansion of the Visitor Economy. Pp. 1–13. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/ book35.a. License: CC-BY-NC-ND 2 Destination London (London and Partners 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Jobs & Growth Plan
    JOBS AND GROWTH PLAN FOR LONDON JOBS AND GROWTH PLAN FOR LONDON APRIL 2013 COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority April 2013 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN Photographs © Copies of this report are available in PDF format from www.london.gov.uk JOBS AND GROWTH PLAN FOR LONDON CONTENTS Foreword by the Co-Chairs of the Panel & the Mayor of London…….….…4 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….…7 Chapter 1 London, A Tale of Two Cities…………….………………………8 Chapter 2 Priorities for the London Enterprise Panel…………………...…12 2.1 Skills and employment…………………………….……….…..14 2.2 Small and medium enterprises……………………………........21 2.3 Sector focus: digital creative, science and technology……..….27 2.4 Infrastructure……………………………………………….....34 Appendices…………………………………………………………......…40 Appendix 1: The role of the Mayor in London Appendix 2: Funding and the LEP Appendix 3: Skills & Employment Devolution, the future? Appendix 4: Members of the London Enterprise Panel Appendix 5: Stakeholders consulted on the LEP’s Jobs & Growth Strategy Appendix 6: Glossary Appendix 7: References JOBS AND GROWTH PLAN FOR LONDON 4 FOREWORD Our task is simple. First we must create opportunities for as many Londoners as possible to become economically active as soon as possible. Second we must start to fit the city for the future, helping it to adapt to a global economy that can shift jobs and capital across time zones in a matter of weeks. These twin objectives require strategic focus, and I hope that is what you will find in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • London & Partners and GLA Present the Mayor of London's
    London & Partners and GLA present the Mayor of London’s “London Is Open” Campaign ICCA Best Marketing Award Campaign Awards Submission 2016 SUMMARY OF CAMPAIGN A major city wide marketing campaign spearheaded by the Mayor of London to show that London is united and open for business to the world following the EU referendum result. #LondonIsOpen shows the world that London remains entrepreneurial, international, and full of creativity and possibility, while reassuring the more than one million foreign nationals who live in London that they will always be welcome, and that any form of discrimination will not be tolerated. - What were the marketing challenges being addressed? BACKGROUND: June 23rd 2016 – the UK referendum results closely voted in favour of the UK leaving the EU. (52%, for 48% against) London voted overwhelmingly in favour of remaining (at 60%) within the EU, and there was a sense of disbelief (even amongst many of the leave voters who didn’t believe they would actually win) around the result. Whilst London & Partners and the GLA were prepared with actions and priorities to tackle whichever way the vote went, we very quickly realised we needed to address immediate negative concerns around London remaining a welcoming city in which to live, work, study, invest and visit. We realised there were global concerns from all areas and we needed to move quickly to start to allay fears for the future, and to start sending positive messages out across a multitude of channels, and it had to be fast. The very real risk we faced were businesses no longer seeing London as a destination for their business events, entrepreneurs and corporations no longer wanting to set up offices here, visitors no longer wanting to visit, and students no longer wanting to study here.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook 2014
    2014 Handbook genesis 2014 INNOVATE DEVELOP EXPAND IN FLANDERS Meet us at the session on ‘The role and impact of nano-electronics in healthcare and life science research’ by Dr. Liesbet Lagae, Associate Professor at K.U. Leuven and Head of R&D at IMEC. IMEC is Flanders’ world-leading independent research centre for nano-electronics applied in future healthcare needs. Visit us at stand no. 31 and find out what Flanders Investment and Trade can do for you and your company! INVESTINFLANDERS.COM Sponsors 3 Genesis 2014 Sponsors Platinum Sponsors Contents Welcome 6 Plenary Speakers 7 - 8 Speakers 8 - 21 Gold Sponsors Programme 22 - 23 Floor Plan and Exhibitor List 24 - 25 The Source Lounge 29 - 32 Silver Sponsors Exhibitors 33 - 45 Corporate Patron Corporate Sponsors Bronze Sponsors INNOVATE Partners DEVELOP EXPAND IN FLANDERS Supporters Meet us at the session on ‘The role and impact of nano-electronics in healthcare and life science research’ by Dr. Liesbet Lagae, Associate Professor at K.U. Leuven and Head of R&D at IMEC. IMEC is Flanders’ world-leading independent research centre for nano-electronics applied in future healthcare needs. Media Partners Visit us at stand no. 31 and find out what Flanders Investment and Trade can do for you and your company! INVESTINFLANDERS.COM EDINBURGH BIOQUARTER Scotland. The home of INSPIRING Whisky and the Bionic Hand. LOCATION We’re the toast of the Edinburgh BioQuarter is an academic medical centre scientifi c community. with a focus on interdisciplinary research and translational medicine, with particular strengths in regenerative medicine and connected health.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the London and Partners Process of Selection of Trade Mission Delegates and Decisions About Sponsorship
    A Review of the London and Partners Process of Selection of Trade Mission Delegates and decisions about Sponsorship A. Context 1. There have been two previous substantive reviews of London and Partners' governance arrangements since 2016, one instigated by the GLA, the other by London and Partners, with resulting action plans and the implementation of recommended changes. Following various allegations in the media in September 2019 regarding past matters, the Mayor of London has commissioned this independent review of current practices at London and Partners in relation to two specific areas, namely the selection of delegates for Trade Missions and decisions about commercial sponsorship. This review has taken place with the agreement of London and Partners. B. Terms of the Review as set by the Mayor of London 2. The terms of this independent review were set by the Mayor of London on 15th October 2019; A. To review the current processes in place at London and Partners (and any GLA involvement in them) in relation to i) determining delegates on Trade Missions ii) deciding commercial sponsorship of external events and organisations B. To review a sample of the application of those processes in practice in the last 12 months C. To make recommendations as appropriate 1 C. Review process 3. This is a review of the processes in place at the current time and it is based on information available at the time of writing. This report is provided following a review of documents attached as appendices to this report (or referred to in the report by web link), a review of the London and Partners website, and having had sight of various on line case management tools and electronic spread sheets.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Government Expenditure Cuts Are Necessary
    Working Paper 61 London & Partners Evaluation Methodology Study Brian Smith and Elisa Conti (London & Partners) July 2014 London & Partners Evaluation Methodology Study Working Paper 61 copyright Greater London Authority July 2014 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queens Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk Tel 020 7983 4922 Minicom 020 7983 4000 ISBN 978-1-84781-577-4 Cover photograph © Daryl Rozario For more information about this publication, please contact: GLA Economics Tel 020 7983 4922 Email [email protected] GLA Economics provides expert advice and analysis on London’s economy and the economic issues facing the capital. Data and analysis from GLA Economics form a basis for the policy and investment decisions facing the Mayor of London and the GLA group. GLA Economics uses a wide range of information and data sourced from third party suppliers within its analysis and reports. GLA Economics cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or timeliness of this information and data. The GLA will not be liable for any losses suffered or liabilities incurred by a party as a result of that party relying in any way on the information contained in this report. London & Partners Evaluation Methodology Study Working Paper 61 Contents Executive summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3 2.
    [Show full text]