DOCSLIB.ORG

Ocean Governance: the Ewn Zealand Dimension Full Report Michael Vincent Mcginnis Victoria University of Wellington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ocean Governance: the Ewn Zealand Dimension Full Report Michael Vincent Mcginnis Victoria University of Wellington Center for the Blue Economy Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy Working Papers Center for the Blue Economy Summer 8-15-2012 Ocean Governance: The ewN Zealand Dimension Full Report Michael Vincent McGinnis Victoria University of Wellington Follow this and additional works at: https://cbe.miis.edu/cbe_working_papers Part of the Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Growth and Development Commons, Leadership Studies Commons, Marine Biology Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Public Policy Commons, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation McGinnis, M.V. (2012). Ocean Governance: The eN w Zealand Dimension. A Full Report. Emerging Issues Programme. School of Government. Victoria University of Wellington. 153 p. August. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for the Blue Economy at Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy. It has been accepted for inclusion in Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ocean Governance: The ewN Zealand Dimension Full Report Abstract The primary goal of this report is to provide interested members of the public and policymakers with a general overview and a description of the types of principles, planning tools, and policy instruments that can be used to strengthen and improve marine governance in New Zealand. As extractive uses (hydrocarbons and minerals, in particular) ramp up and others are explored and brought on line in the marine areas of New Zealand, the need will increase for a more integrative, ecosystem-based approach to marine governance. This study is based on the following types of analysis: • a review of the literature on the existing governance framework in New Zealand • a comprehensive review of the scientific literature on integrative, ecosystem-based marine governance • an evaluation of case study materials on offshore oil and gas development, marine aquaculture, marine life protection, and marine minerals exploration • a examination of New Zealand’s marine policies and legislation • a synthesis of materials and input from participants in the project’s four workshops on the subjects of marine farming, aquaculture, marine science and technology, and marine governance • an assessment of the information and materials gained from a series of confidential, one-on-one and group interviews, conducted in person or by telephone during 2010 and 2011, with a selection of ocean stakeholders including academics, members of non-government organizations, regional and national resource managers, members of the public service, and representatives of major ocean industries, such as offshore oil, commercial fishing, and mining interests. The am jor findings of this study are that the existing marine governance framework in New Zealand emphasises a traditional sector-by-sector approach to management and planning, and that this fragmented governance framework contributes to a number of institutional challenges, such as: • a spatial and temporal overlap of human activities and their objectives, causing conflicts (user–user and user–ecosystem conflicts) • a lack of connection between the various authorities responsible for individual activities • a lack of connection between offshore activities and resource use and onshore communities that are dependent on them • a lack of protection of culturally and ecologically sensitive marine areas. In addition, the study identifies a number of factors that influence marine planning and decision-making in the country, including but not limited to: • a lack of institutional capacity and capability to govern marine resources and address ecosystem issues across administrative jurisdictions and management sectors This article is available at Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy: https://cbe.miis.edu/cbe_working_papers/1 • general scientific uncertainty and a paucity of information with respect to the resources and the more general ecological features of the marine area • the relationships between economic use of marine resources and the maintenance of marine ecosystem services and goods • Māori interests, perspectives and treaty obligations • increasing pressures from the use of marine areas, including the impacts of terrestrial inputs from coastal waterways on nearshore marine ecosystems and resources • the role of international treaties and conventions • the synergistic and cumulative impacts of multiple use and climate disturbance on marine ecosystems • the role of scientists and science in marine planning and decision-making. This report describes two general recommendations. First, with respect to the territorial sea (which includes the marine area out to 12 nautical miles) the report recommends that regional councils develop integrative marine plans where conflict between users and users-ecosystems is likely to develop in the future. Second, the report recommends the adoption of a new role for central government to support an ecosystem-based approach to integrative marine planning and decision-making. Within central government, stronger interagency coordination and new public policy are needed to address future marine resource conflicts and to support an ecosystem-based approach to integrative marine planning and collaborative decision- making for the EEZ. There is also a new role for place-based collaborative decision-making and planning to address conflicts in marine areas that are likely to be developed in the future. A range of new principles of marine governance, planning tools and policy instruments are described that support a marine ecosystem-based approach to integrative planning across management sectors for the EEZ. This article is available at Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy: https://cbe.miis.edu/cbe_working_papers/1 Ocean Governance: The New Zealand Dimension Full Report Michael Vincent McGinnis, PhD Emerging Issues Programme Institute of Policy Studies School of Government Victoria University of Wellington Cover Design by James Binaski Cover photographs by Lou Hunt, Mike McGinnis and Trevor Penfold 2 Acknowledgments This project was funded by the Emerging Issues Programme (2010–2012), overseen by the Institute of Policy Studies at Victoria University of Wellington. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author. The author would like to thank the members of this project’s advisory committee who provided valuable input and direction in the development of this study: Dr. Jonathan Boston, School of Government, Victoria University of Wellington Daniel Brown, Senior Policy Analyst, Ministry for the Environment Dr. Jonathan Gardner, Reader in Marine Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington Dr. Alison MacDiarmid, Group Manager, Marine Ecology, NIWA John Marshall, Manager, Environmental Research and Analysis, Maritime New Zealand Jim Nicolson, Policy Manager, Department of Conservation John Pfalert, Executive Officer, Petroleum Exploration and Production Association Cathy Scott, Deputy CE Fisheries Management, Ministry of Fisheries (now MAF) Dr. Charlotte Severne, Chief Scientist, Ocean Science and Māori Development, NIWA Bob Zuur, Marine biologist in WWF - New Zealand’s marine protection team Meghan Collins, Ministry for the Environment. This Full Report was revised to incorporate comments and recommendations from a peer review of the Summary Report that was provided in March 2012 by Dr. Randall Bess (MAF); Dr. Jonathan Boston (VUW); Meghan Collins (MfE); Sean Cooper (and other staff members at the DOC); Dr. Chris Cornelisen (Cawthron Institute); Raewyn Peart (EDS); and Cristine Stevenson (and other staff members with the Marine and Environmental Governance Team at the MfE). The author would also like to thank Vic Lipski for the copyediting and proof reading of the Report. About the author Dr Michael Vincent McGinnis received a PhD in Political Science in 1993. He is an Associate Professor of International Marine Science and Policy at the Graduate School of International Policy and Management, Monterey Institute of International Studies and the Center for the Blue Economy in California, USA. He was Director of the Ocean and Coastal Policy Center at the University of California Santa Barbara from 1995-2010. He has published over 100 journal articles, essays, books, government reports and technical documents on the subject of biodiversity conservation and ecosystem-based planning. Citation: McGinnis, M.V. (2012). Ocean Governance: The New Zealand Dimension. A Full Report. Emerging Issues Programme. School of Government. Victoria University of Wellington. 153 p. August. © Victoria University of Wellington 2012 3 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 7 1. BEYOND THE BLUE HORIZON ................................................................................... 13 1.1 The Islands of Aotearoa ................................................................................................ 14 1.2 The Nomos of the Earth ................................................................................................ 18 1.3 The Themes of this Report ........................................................................................... 21 1.4 Approach
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Oceans Governance: New and Emerging Issues
    EG41CH02-Campbell ARI 22 June 2016 10:35 V I E Review in Advance first posted online E W on July 6, 2016. (Changes may R S still occur before final publication online and in print.) I E N C N A D V A Global Oceans Governance: New and Emerging Issues Lisa M. Campbell,1 Noella J. Gray,2 Luke Fairbanks,1 Jennifer J. Silver,2 Rebecca L. Gruby,3 Bradford A. Dubik,1 and Xavier Basurto1 1Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University Marine Lab, Beaufort, North Carolina 28516; email: [email protected] 2Department of Geography, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario NIG 2W1, Canada 3Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2016. 41:2.1–2.27 Keywords The Annual Review of Environment and Resources is Access provided by Duke University on 08/08/16. For personal use only. food production, industrialization, biodiversity conservation, global online at environ.annualreviews.org environmental change, pollution Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2016.41. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021121 Abstract Copyright c 2016 by Annual Reviews. Increased interest in oceans is leading to new and renewed global governance All rights reserved efforts directed toward ocean issues in areas of food production, biodiversity conservation, industrialization, global environmental change, and pollution. Global oceans governance efforts face challenges and opportunities related to the nature of oceans and to actors involved in, the scale of, and knowl- edge informing their governance. We review these topics generally and in relation to nine new and emerging issues: small-scale fisheries (SSFs), aqua- culture, biodiversity conservation on the high seas, large marine protected areas (LMPAs), tuna fisheries, deep-sea mining, ocean acidification (OA), blue carbon (BC), and plastics pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Governance and Its Implementation, All of Which May Be Applicable in the Context of the Arctic Council’S Work
    O CEA N GOVERNANCE AN D ITS IM PLEM ENTATION: GU IDIN G PRINCIPLES FO R THE ARCTIC REGIO N 1 Dr. François N. Bailet2 TABLE OF CONTENT INTORDUCTION: MANIFESTATIONS OF OCEAN GOVERNANCE............................................... 2 THE GUIDEING PRINCIPLES OF OCEAN GOVERNANCE ........................................................... 3 LEVELS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF OCEAN GOVERNANCE ....................................................... 6 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................. 19 This background paper is intended to serve as an information piece which outlines Ocean Governance Theory, as envisioned by the late Elisabeth Mann Borgese, and as it may be applicable to the Arctic Region in support of the Arctic Council’s (PAME) work in the elaboration of an Arctic Marine Strategic Plan. It is not the intent of this paper to review the current status of legal, political and institutional approaches to the management of Arctic resources and activities. These topics are extensively reviewed in the current literature and numerous relevant subject experts may contribute directly to the work of the Arctic Council.3 It is also not the intent of this paper to provide a prescriptive commentary on an approach to adopt in the Arctic Region. The contents of this paper are thus solely intended to contribute to the relevant discussions by providing an overview of Ocean Governance and its Implementation, all of which may be applicable in the context of the Arctic
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Three Regional
    Effective Governance and Policy Implementation in Governing High Seas Fisheries: A Comparative Study of Three Regional Fisheries Management Organizations By Jia Huey Hsu A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington 2018 Abstract Two-thirds of fish stocks commercially fished on the high seas are either depleted or overexploited. Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs) are key international actors having the legal competence to establish fishery conservation and management measures to improve the optimal and sustainable utilization of high seas fisheries resources. The literature suggests that their effectiveness is varied. While some RFMOs are making progress towards more sustainable fisheries, some are facing fish stock depletion. The literature indicates that organizational governance design and quality of implementation are central to the disparities. Thus far, while most of the discussion has focused on the effectiveness, and how to enhance the transparency of RFMOs, very little research has explored the designs of governance arrangements and implementation of RFMOs. Accordingly, this study contributes to the literature on governance arrangements and policy implementation of the high seas by offering in-depth case studies of the selected RFMOs. It employs qualitative methods to analyze data collected from semi-structured interviews with 24 actors (i.e., officials, delegations, and fisheries experts), as well as a collection of published and unpublished documents regarding three selected RFMOs. The three selected RFMOs are the Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC), and the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organization (SPRFMO).
    [Show full text]
  • WCMC NTFP V6
    E R M E H S H o t s s p a o e t S E n c o a s e y p s o t r e u m E f R o e s se in arc rg h on the Ma Deep-sea biodiversity and ecosystems A scoping report on their socio-economy, management and governance Regional Seas E R M E H S H o t s s p a o e t S E n c o a s e y p s o t r e u m E f R o e s se in arc rg h on the Ma Deep-sea biodiversity and ecosystems A scoping report on their socio-economy, management and governance Regional Seas UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 219 Huntingdon Road, The authors are grateful to Salvatore Arico, Claire Armstrong, Antje Cambridge CB3 0DL, Boetius, Miquel Canals, Lionel Carter, Teresa Cunha, Roberto United Kingdom Danovaro, Anthony Grehan, Ahmed Khalil, Thomas Koetz, Nicolas Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Kosoy, Gilles Lericolais, Alex Roger, James Spurgeon, Rob Tinch Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 and Phil Weaver for their insightful comments on earlier versions Email: [email protected] of this report. Thanks also for the additional comments provided Website: www.unep-wcmc.org by UNEP Reginal Seas Programme Focal Points, and to all individuals and institutions who gave permission to use their ©UNEP-WCMC/UNEP December 2007 pictures. Special thanks to Vikki Gunn and Angela Benn for their input and support and to Stefan Hain from UNEP for his significant ISBN: 978-92-807-2892-7 input, dedication and immense enthusiasm.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Governance and the Private Sector
    OCEAN GOVERNANCE AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR White Paper June 2018 World Ocean Council Paul Holthus CEO, World Oceans Council [email protected] Tel: +1 (808) 277-9008 © World Ocean Council 2018 OCEAN GOVERNANCE AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR Executive Summary Ocean Governance (OG) is the foundation of rules, institutions, processes, agreements and arrangements based on which economic activities are undertaken. A stable, predictable governance framework is essential to the responsible use of ocean space and resources and ocean sustainable development. Effective and sustainable governance of the global ocean is essential to achieving a balance between the growth and development of the ocean economy and maintaining the health and productivity of the global, interconnected ocean. For the ocean business community, this is complicated by the range of international and regional agencies and bodies to address high seas governance through legal and regulatory situations. OG efforts must understand and address the opportunities and challenges facing the diverse, extensive set of existing and future ocean industry activities, at a pace commensurate with the growth of the ocean economy. This is especially important in relation to international, transboundary issues, resources and activities and for the areas beyond national jurisdiction. Success in improving OG and ocean sustainable development requires coordinated engagement by the diverse, international ocean business community. It is important for ocean industries to be aware of the major international ocean policy and governance processes that will affect the business operations in the ocean. These processes are often not sector specific but are being undertaken through a variety of intergovernmental arenas with little or no industry involvement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development
    The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development <UN> Elisabeth Mann Borgese, 1918–2002 First Lady of the Oceans remembering Elisabeth Mann Borgese Committed as she was to all the right things, she gave dazzling speeches with a brilliant turn of a phrase, but I remember her best standing on her head and smiling upside down. It was the oceans she loved, those salty seas where life began and over time emerged onto land. She believed a new set of laws would do as life had done: emerge from the seas onto land. She gave her own life to this grand possibility. She lived at the water’s edge and took her dogs for long walks on the sandy shores. In her quiet moments she taught her dogs, proper English setters, to play piano, to type and even to write Columbian school poetry. I learned from her the art of vision, of looking into the depths and finding a future worth fighting for. She was only fifty when I saw her standing on her head, well past youth and on her way to venerability. She grew older with grace, never slowing her tempo or showing the accumulating years. They called her the queen of the seas, the first lady of the oceans. It was the mountains that took her away, the snow covered mountains. david krieger, February 2011 <UN> The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development Essays in Honor of Elisabeth Mann Borgese (1918–2002) Edited by the International Ocean Institute - Canada Dirk Werle – Paul R. Boudreau – Mary R.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief #8 Recommendations on the Ocean and Seas
    Policy Brief #8 Recommendations on the Ocean and Seas for the UN General Assembly Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals (OWG on SDGs) Additional policy briefs are available at http://bit.ly/OWGpolicybriefs The following recommendations on oceans and seas have been compiled from two civil society consultations conducted by UN-NGLS in 2013-2014: a teleconference-based consultation that resulted in the report Advancing Regional Recommendations on the Post-2015 Agenda, and an online consultation on four post-2015 reports to the Secretary-General. A list of organizations that participated in these consultations is available here. This policy brief also draws on position papers developed for the OWG on SDGs by the Women’s Major Group, the High Seas Alliance and the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition,1 WWF International,2 and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).3 While presenting a wide range of views, this brief does not intend to represent the complete breadth of perspectives and recommendations emerging from civil society regarding the health of the ocean and seas for the post-2015 development agenda. As WWF International identified, the ocean and seas are a vital life support system. They cover more than 70% of the planet’s surface, produce more than half of the world’s oxygen supply, distribute heat, and drive weather. They are home to the majority of Earth’s plant and animal life, providing food for people in every country, and supporting livelihoods. However, destructive human activities have severely
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Governance and Blue Growth Challenges, Opportunities and Policy Responses
    BRIEFING Ocean governance and blue growth Challenges, opportunities and policy responses SUMMARY Oceans cover more than two thirds of the earth and are a vital element of life on our planet. Not only are they a primary source of food, they are also central to the carbon cycle; they regulate the climate and produce most of the oxygen in the air we breathe. They also play an important socio-economic role. The 'blue economy', covering traditional sectors such as fisheries, extraction of oil and gas, maritime transport and coastal tourism, as well as new, fast-growing industries such as offshore wind, ocean energy and blue biotechnology, shows great potential for further economic growth, employment creation and innovation. At the same time, oceans face pressures, mainly associated with the over-exploitation of resources, pollution and the effects of climate change. In recent years, ocean pollution from plastics has received more attention from the public and has been high on policy-makers' agendas. At global level, the European Union is an active player in protecting oceans and shaping ocean governance. It has made progress by taking measures in a series of areas: maritime security, marine pollution, sustainable blue economy, climate change, marine protection, and sustainable fisheries; by working towards the United Nations 2030 Agenda sustainable development goal on oceans; and by taking part in negotiations on a new international legally binding instrument on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. In encouraging the blue economy, the EU also recognises the environmental responsibilities that go along with it.
    [Show full text]
  • A Transition to Sustainable Ocean Governance ✉ Tanya Brodie Rudolph1, Mary Ruckelshaus 2 , Mark Swilling3, Edward H
    PERSPECTIVE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17410-2 OPEN A transition to sustainable ocean governance ✉ Tanya Brodie Rudolph1, Mary Ruckelshaus 2 , Mark Swilling3, Edward H. Allison 4,5, Henrik Österblom 6, Stefan Gelcich 7 & Philile Mbatha8 Human wellbeing relies on the Biosphere, including natural resources provided by ocean ecosystems. As multiple demands and stressors threaten the ocean, transformative change in ocean governance is required to maintain the contributions of the ocean to people. Here we 1234567890():,; illustrate how transition theory can be applied to ocean governance. We demonstrate how current economic and social systems can adapt to existing pressures and shift towards ocean stewardship through incorporation of niche innovations within and across economic sectors and stakeholder communities. These novel approaches support an emergent but purposeful transition and suggest a clear path to a thriving and vibrant relationship between humans and the ocean. Oceans provide important natural resources, but the management and governance of the ocean is complex and the ecosystem is suffering as a result. The authors discuss current barriers to sustainable ocean governance and suggest pathways forward. new relationship between humanity and the ocean is required to secure the continuity of Athe diverse life support roles provided by the sea1,2. Ocean governance faces the challenge of reflecting the multi-dimensional and interconnected role that the ocean plays in environmental health, economic prosperity and human well-being1–4, including justice and equity1,5–7. The ocean, when considered as a whole, cannot be defined solely as either a state-governed public good, nor as a commodity or private good.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Principles for High Seas Governance
    10 Principles for High Seas Governance The ocean is a unique, extraordinary and vital element of our planet, covering more than 70 per cent of its surface. It sustains life on Earth by generating oxygen, absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, regulating climate and temperature and providing a substantial portion of the global population with food and livelihood. It provides medicine, energy, transport routes amongst many other services and has been a nexus for various cultures. National jurisdiction over resources has recently been extended to 200 nautical miles in the sea, leaving about 60 per cent of the ocean as “high seas” and deep seabed beyond national jurisdiction. Long treated as though empty of life other than some fishes, we are now discovering that these areas of the oceans contain some of the richest biodiversity on the planet. This High seas biodiversity is under increasing threat from many sources, including irresponsible fishing and shipping activities, pollution and climate change. Yet, there is no comprehensive policy or management framework to govern the high seas, and the patchy laws that exist are largely based on 17th century principles of open access, ignoring many of the environmental principles that have been long applied for land and atmosphere and even for outer space. Beyond national jurisdiction, many human activities remain unregulated, ecosystem considerations are seldom taken into account and scientific information is often ignored. Experience in managing ocean resources has provided many lessons that need to be put into practice. Critical policy issues to improve high seas governance are ready to be addressed and practical steps can be taken to improve biodiversity conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Document Template
    UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME PROJECT DOCUMENT Global Project Project Title: Global Water and Ocean Governance Support Programme Project Number: Project 00115482 / Output 00113069 / Output 00117778 Implementing Partner: UNDP (DIM) Start Date: 1 January 2019 End Date: 31 December 2023 PAC Meeting date: original PAC: 21 Dec 2018 (original ProDoc signed 16 Jan 2019) Amendments endorsed 7 August 2019 Brief Description – Substantive Project Amendment By way of supporting partners to improve water and ocean governance at local, national, regional and global levels, this project addresses matters of increasing stress on freshwater and marine resources and related ecosystems, its repercussions on food systems and the sustainability of water and sanitation services. The problems are rooted in poverty, exclusion, market failures and the lack of governance systems to protect livelihoods and fragile resources. Solutions are found in the support to innovation and the implementation of reforms towards sustainable, inclusive and integrated freshwater and marine resources management. This includes enhancing the application and complementarity of ecosystem-based, gender-transformative and human rights-based approaches. This project is to contribute meaningfully to Sustainable Development Goals 6 on water management and sanitation; Goal 14 on conservation and sustainable use of marine resources; and related SDG targets of the 2030 Agenda, including 1.4 on equal rights to resources and services, 1.5 on reducing vulnerability, and 2.3 on increased productivity and income of small-scale food producers. Built on UNDP’s Water and Ocean Governance theory of change, the Global Water and Ocean Governance Support Programme assists partners in formulating, coordinating and implementing water/ocean governance reforms by providing necessary policy advice and technical assistance, knowledge and capacity development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Environmental and Socioeconomic Effects of Overfishing Due to the Globalization of the Seafood Industry
    The Environmental and Socioeconomic Effects of Overfishing Due to the Globalization of the Seafood Industry Elizabeth Jones COLLST-499: Contemporary Perspectives Philip J. Gibbon, Adjunct Professor of History College of Science, Health, and the Liberal Arts Environmental Sustainability Thailand 2 Section I: Overfishing as a Consequence of the Globalization of the Fishing Industry Historically, humans have utilized fishing and the extraction of marine resources as a source of food, for cultural significance, and as a means of livelihood. The first documented cases of overfishing occurred in the 1800s when whale populations were decimated for their blubber, which was used primarily for lamp oil. By the 1950s Atlantic cod and herring as well as California sardines were harvested to the brink of extinction for human consumption (“Overfishing”). Today, overfishing is a global issue that plagues roughly 85 percent of global fisheries (“Overfishing Ocean”). The commercial exploitation of global fisheries has resulted in the unequal distribution of marine resources, especially for poor people in developing nations who rely on seafood as a primary source of protein and livelihood. As affluent nations increasingly demand high- value fish, fisheries have become privatized, making it difficult for people in developing nations to compete with global commercial fishing fleets (Greenberg). As a result, issues of food scarcity and loss of employment will continue to affect the 2.6 billion people that live in coastal communities and developing nations that greatly depend on fish to survive (Hauge, et al. 1). With the globalization of the fishing industry, overfishing has become a prominent food security issue that affects people on every continent, and requires multilateral cooperation and compliance in order to secure the livelihood of millions and prevent the collapse of the fishing industry.
    [Show full text]