Kauhajoki School Shooting Official Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kauhajoki School Shooting Official Report 39/2010 Kauhajoki School Shooting on 23 September 2008 Report of the Investigation Commission REPORTS AND GUIDELINES 39/2010 Kauhajoki School Shooting on 23 September 2008 Report of the Investigation Commission Translation of the Finnish original report Multiprint Oy VANTAA, FINLAND 2010 17.2.2010 Name of Kauhajoki School Shooting on 23 September 2008 – Report of the Investigation the Publication Commission Author Investigation Commission of the Kauhajoki School Shooting Publication of the Reports and guidelines Serial number 39/2010 Ministry of Justice OSKARI number OM 11/021/2008 ISSN-L 1798-7059 ISSN (bound) 1798-7059 ISSN (PDF) 1759-7067 ISBN (bound) 978-952-466-514-8 ISBN (PDF) 978-952-466-515-5 Keywords school shooting, Kauhajoki, guns, security recommendations Abstract On 23 September 2008, a school shooting took place in Kauhajoki when a student in the local polytechnic entered his school, shot nine students in his study group, a teacher, and finally himself. The perpetrator carried fuel with him which he used to start several fires in the building. Of the students who were in the classroom when the incident took place, three survived, one of whom received a gunshot wound in the head. The psychosocial damage caused by the incident was considerable. An investigation commission was appointed to look into the incident and its back- ground, as well as the activities of the authorities, other operators involved in the inci- dent, and the media. The main results of the investigation are presented in the 28 conclusions and 9 recommendations included in the report. The purpose of the rec- ommendations and the entire investigation process was to enhance general security by learning from the incident. The fact that the perpetrator ended up committing this act was the result of a long process involving many factors. He had been suffering from mental health problems for approximately ten years and his condition had taken a turn for the worse. Several factors were involved during the course of the perpetrator’s life which contributed to his problems. With hindsight, it seems probable that the perpetrator would have bene- fited from being examined by a specialist in psychiatry. In the light of the information currently available, it is impossible to establish beyond any doubt why the young man’s mental health problems were channelled into an admiration for school shoot- ings and, eventually, led to him committing the deed, which was clearly modelled on earlier school shootings. The perpetrator used a self-loading or semi-automatic firearm, which was small-calibre but still capable of inflicting serious damage. The investigation commission recom- mends that firearms capable of firing multiple shots in a very short period of time be made illegal, and that only guns that do not allow the easy infliction of such carnage be available for hobby purposes. With respect to other types of firearms, the investiga- tion commission recommends that a stricter licensing policy be implemented. A dis- senting opinion on firearm recommendations has been recorded, however. To enhance the mental health care services available for young people, the committee also recommends that antidepressants not be prescribed for persons younger than 23 years of age without a thorough examination by a specialist doctor. Other recommen- dations presented in the report concern the enhancement of student health care, par- ticularly mental health care; the enhancement of interaction between generations in educational institutions; comprehensive security planning in educational institutions; shared command responsibility between authorities in operational situations; coopera- tion between authorities in preventive work; and the coordination of psychosocial sup- port. FOREWORD On 23 September 2008, a school shooting took place in Kauhajoki, with a student shooting 10 others and then himself in a school building. In this investigation report, the incident will be referred to by the everyday-language term ‘school shooting’ regardless of the definition of that phrase in criminal law. The crimes investigated by the police were 10 murders, 12 attempted murders, and an aggravated act of destruction. On the basis of the Act on the Investigation of Certain Fatal Incidents (662/2008), the Government appointed on 27 November 2008 an investigation commission to investi- gate the incident. The composition of the investigation commission was as follows: Chairman Pekka Sauri, chairman of the Finnish Central Association for Mental Health Members Pekka Aho, Inspector General of the Police, Ministry of the Interior, Se- curity Sector Supervision Unit (currently Chief Inspector for the Central Finland Police Department) Mirjam Kalland, Secretary General of the Mannerheim League for Child Welfare Esko Kaukonen, Special Research Officer of the Emergency Services College Ullamaija Kivikuru, Professor, University of Helsinki Pauli Niemelä, Professor, University of Kuopio (now the University of Eastern Finland) Leena Suurpää, Research Director at the Finnish Youth Research Society Kai Valonen, Chief Accident Investigator, Accident Investigation Board Secretary Sini Järvi, Assistant, Accident Investigation Board The expert for the investigation commission in structural fire safety and management of rescue activities was Rescue Director Jorma Westerholm of the Rescue Department of Northern Savonia. The psychiatry expert was Jari Sinkkonen, MD, Docent. On the basis of the police investigation, the investigation commission drew up this investi- gation report, wherein the approach is similar to that of an accident investigation. The in- vestigation report is divided into three main sections. The first, referred to as the factual section, recounts the events and their background. In the analysis section, the investigation commission analyses the facts that emerged in the investigation and discusses their signifi- cance. On the basis of the preceding analysis, the last section of the investigation report presents the conclusions and recommendations of the investigation commission. The investigation was aimed at the prevention of similar incidents and the improvement of safety, so no consideration was given to questions of guilt or compensation. The in- vestigation report was not written to be used in a court of law; therefore, its content and style do not correspond to legal practice. The draft investigation report was circulated for comments in the Prime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Transport and Communications, and the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Addi- tionally, interested parties and persons and organisations closely involved in the incident were invited to submit their comments on the report. The comments were taken into ac- count when the finishing touches were being put to the report. The investigation report is available for download on the Ministry of Justice Web site, www.om.fi. The investigation material is held by the Accident Investigation Board of Finland. INDEX 1. THE INCIDENT .................................................................................................................. 13 1.1. General description....................................................................................................... 13 1.2. The locale...................................................................................................................... 13 1.3. The course of events ..................................................................................................... 14 1.4. Police and rescue operations......................................................................................... 18 1.4.1. Alerts .................................................................................................................. 18 1.4.2. Police operations ................................................................................................ 21 1.4.3. Rescue operations............................................................................................... 23 1.4.4. Emergency Medical Services............................................................................. 24 1.4.5. Activities at medical institutions........................................................................ 27 1.4.6. Other immediate action taken by the authorities................................................ 28 1.4.7. Operational command involving multiple authorities........................................ 29 1.4.8. Communications................................................................................................. 30 1.4.9. Action taken by central administration authorities ............................................ 31 1.5. Identifying the victims and informing the families ...................................................... 34 1.6. Psychosocial support..................................................................................................... 37 1.6.1. Acute crisis relief ............................................................................................... 37 1.6.2. Psychosocial support in the following months and years .................................. 41 1.7. Damage ......................................................................................................................... 43 1.7.1. Personal injury.................................................................................................... 43 1.7.2. Damage to property...........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Ilmajoki Seinäjoki Lapua Kurikka Kuortane Kauhava Jalasjärvi
    YRITYSTUKIOPAS2015 Ilmajoki Jalasjärvi Kauhava Kuortane Kurikka Lapua Seinäjoki 2 Sisällys 1 ALKUSANAT 4 2 YLEISTÄ YRITYSTUISTA 6 3 TUENMYÖNTÄJÄTAHOT 9 • Leader-ryhmät 9 • Etelä-Pohjanmaan ELY-keskus 10 ° Yrityscase: Domretor Oy 13 • Etelä-Pohjanmaan TE-toimisto 14 • Finnvera 17 • Tekes 17 • Oppisopimustoimisto 19 • ARA 20 • Finnfund 20 • Finnpartnership 21 • Finpro 21 • Nefco 22 • NIB 23 • Nopef 23 • Pohjois-Pohjanmaan ELY-keskus 24 • Suomen Teollisuussijoitus 24 • TEM (sis. Hämeen ELY-keskus ja Varsinais-Suomen ELY-keskus) 25 • Työeläkeyhtiöt 26 • Työsuojelurahasto 26 4 LISÄNÄKÖKULMA 27 Lisänäkökulma 1: EU:n erityisohjelmat pk-yrityksille 27 • Horizon2020 27 • Cosme 28 • Eurostars2 28 Lisänäkökulma 2: välillisesti tarjolla olevia EU:n hankerahoja 29 3 1 Alkusanat Tämä yritystukiopas on tehty seitsemän eteläpohjalaisen kunnan – Ilmajoki, Jalasjärvi, Kauhava, Kuortane, Kurikka, Lapua ja Seinäjoki – toimeksiannosta ja LX Com Oy:n toteuttamana. Projektin ohjausryhmän ovat muodostaneet Pekka Hunnakko (Seinäjoki), Juha-Martti Kuoppala (Kauhava) ja Jouko Vuolle (Lapua). Oppaan käsikirjoituksen ovat laatineet Tapio Eräheimo ja Taimo Stenman, jotka vastaavat seuraa- vassa opasta koskeviin kysymyksiin. Mitä opas sisältää? Oppaassa käsitellään yrityksille suoraan tarjottavia avustuksia, julkisten organisaatioiden yri- tyksille tarjoamia rahoituksellisia ratkaisuja sekä edellisiin rinnastettavia kansallisia yritystukia. Lisäksi kuvataan EU:n rakennerahastot ja kuinka yksittäinen yritys voi – välillisesti – päästä osalliseksi niiden kautta jaettavasta
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Market Areas Final Technical Report of the Finnish Project September 2017
    Eurostat – Labour Market Areas – Final Technical report – Finland 1(37) Labour Market Areas Final Technical report of the Finnish project September 2017 Data collection for sub-national statistics (Labour Market Areas) Grant Agreement No. 08141.2015.001-2015.499 Yrjö Palttila, Statistics Finland, 22 September 2017 Postal address: 3rd floor, FI-00022 Statistics Finland E-mail: [email protected] Yrjö Palttila, Statistics Finland, 22 September 2017 Eurostat – Labour Market Areas – Final Technical report – Finland 2(37) Contents: 1. Overview 1.1 Objective of the work 1.2 Finland’s national travel-to-work areas 1.3 Tasks of the project 2. Results of the Finnish project 2.1 Improving IT tools to facilitate the implementation of the method (Task 2) 2.2 The finished SAS IML module (Task 2) 2.3 Define Finland’s LMAs based on the EU method (Task 4) 3. Assessing the feasibility of implementation of the EU method 3.1 Feasibility of implementation of the EU method (Task 3) 3.2 Assessing the feasibility of the adaptation of the current method of Finland’s national travel-to-work areas to the proposed method (Task 3) 4. The use and the future of the LMAs Appendix 1. Visualization of the test results (November 2016) Appendix 2. The lists of the LAU2s (test 12) (November 2016) Appendix 3. The finished SAS IML module LMAwSAS.1409 (September 2017) 1. Overview 1.1 Objective of the work In the background of the action was the need for comparable functional areas in EU-wide territorial policy analyses. The NUTS cross-national regions cover the whole EU territory, but they are usually regional administrative areas, which are the re- sult of historical circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dispersal and Acclimatization of the Muskrat, Ondatra Zibethicus (L.), in Finland
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Other Publications in Wildlife Management for 1960 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland Atso Artimo Suomen Riistanhoito-Saatio (Finnish Game Foundation) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Artimo, Atso, "The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland" (1960). Other Publications in Wildlife Management. 65. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother/65 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Other Publications in Wildlife Management by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. R I 1ST A TIE T L .~1 U ( K A I S U J A ,>""'liSt I " e'e 'I >~ ~··21' \. • ; I .. '. .' . .,~., . <)/ ." , ., Thedi$perscdQnd.a~C:li"'dti~otlin. of ,the , , :n~skret, Ond~trq ~ib.t~i~',{(.h in. Firtland , 8y: ATSO ARTIMO . RllSTATIETEELLISljX JULKAISUJA PAPERS ON GAME RESEARCH 21 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (l.), in Finland By ATSO ARTIMO Helsinki 1960 SUOMEN FIN LANDS R I 1ST A N HOI T O-S A A T I b ] AK TV ARDSSTI FTELSE Riistantutkimuslaitos Viltforskningsinstitutet Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsingfors, Unionsg. 45 B FINNISH GAME FOUNDATION Game Research Institute Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsinki 1960 . K. F. Puromichen Kirjapaino O.-Y. The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland By Atso Artimo CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • In Adobe Portable Document Format (.Pdf)
    Journal of the Western Society of Criminology Volume 14, Issue 3 November 2013 Western Criminology Review Official Journal of the Western Society of Criminology http://wcr.sonoma.edu The Western Criminology Review (WCR) is a forum for the publication and discussion of theory, research, policy, and practice in the rapidly changing and interdisciplinary fields of criminology and criminal justice. The Journal is intended to reflect local (Western), national, and international concerns. Historical and contemporary perspectives are encouraged, as are diverse methodological approaches. Although manuscripts that rely upon text and tables are invited, authors who use other resources permitted on the Internet — e.g., graphics, hypertext links, etc., are also welcome. The publication and distribution of articles will also be accompanied by electronic commentary and discussion. The Journal is made available exclusively on the Internet at the Western Criminology Review website (http://wcr.sonoma.edu/). The goal of WCR is to provide an attractive and meaningful outlet for academic and policy related publication and dialogue in a wide variety of substantive areas in criminology and criminal justice. Please direct any inquiries to one of the co‐editors listed below. Co‐Editors Stuart Henry, Christine Curtis, and Nicole L. Bracy San Diego State University Managing Editor, Nicole L. Bracy Assistant Editor, Nicole Sherman [email protected] Editorial Staff Name Position Affiliation Email Andre Rosay Consulting Editor University of Alaska Anchorage [email protected] Sharon Chamard Consulting Editor University of Alaska Anchorage [email protected] Stephen Tibbetts Consulting Editor California State University, San [email protected] Bernardino Gisela Bichler Consulting Editor California State University, San [email protected] Bernardino Patrick Jackson Consulting Information Sonoma State University [email protected] Technology Specialist Paula Hammett Consulting Librarian Sonoma State University [email protected] Editorial Advisory Board M.
    [Show full text]
  • Fascist Lapua Movement in the 1930S SAMI
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery 1 Christ vs. Communism: Communism as a Religious Social Problem in Finland’s Proto- Fascist Lapua Movement in the 1930s SAMI KOSKELAINEN AND TITUS HJELM1 Abstract This article traces the emergence of religious anti-communist discourse in Finland’s proto-fascist Lapua Movement in the 1930s. Applying constructionist social problems theory, it discusses the constructions of communism as a religious social problem, Christian piety as a solution to the problem of godless communism, and the religious legitimation of violence. The article argues that by identifying Christianity with the Finnish nation the construction of communism as a religious problem—itself an outcome of the influence of revivalist Lutheran ministers in the leadership of the movement—resonated with the broader audience, but that this indigenous religious nationalism lost support with the increasing belligerence of the movement. At the end of the 1920s Finland was a divided country. The Civil War of 1918, fought between the socialist “Reds” and the bourgeois and agrarian “Whites” in the aftermath of independence from (now Bolshevik) Russia, was a cultural trauma on par with the Spanish Civil War.1 The proportional death toll in the repression of the defeated Reds exceeded that of all other European civil conflicts in the inter-war era.2 Yet, despite the victory and the official banning of the Communist Party, some factions on the White side saw the re-emergence and 1 Sami Koskelainen has a Bachelor of Arts from University College London, School of Slavonic and East European Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • PÄÄSIÄIS KOKKOJA Hyvän Satovuoden
    Pääsiäsikokkoja eli pääsiäisvalkeita Luoto on perinteisesti sytytelty Etelä-, Keski- ja Pohjois-Pohjanmaalla. Pietarsaari 71. Uskottiin, että tuona päivänä, jolloin Jeesus oli kuolleena, Jumalan suojeleva vaikutus oli Pohjalaisia Pedersöre pienimmillään. Kokkojen polttamisella pyrittiin 80. noitien ja pahojen henkien karkottamiseen. 67. Uusikaarlepyy Suurten olkimäärien polton 6. uskottiin lakeuksilla tuovan PÄÄSIÄIS KOKKOJA hyvän satovuoden. Evijärvi 7. 4. 36. 38. Mustasaari 52. Vöyri 37. 51. 84. 82. 5. Lappa- Vaasa 81. 85. järvi Vimpeli 32. 83. Vähäkyrö Kauhava 30.33.31. 15. 92. 94. 59. 63. 87. 3. 61. 49. Isokyrö 88. 54. 55. 2. 1. Laihia 93. 48. 89. Lapua Alajärvi 35. 62. 60. 53. 50. 86. Maalahti 57. Soini 34. 42. 8. 64. 58. Korsnäs 41. 56. 25. 10. 11. 73. 40. 9. 72. Kuortane 75. Ilmajoki 12. 74. 43. 24. 13. Seinäjoki Töysä Närpiö Kurikka 46. 66. 65. Teuva 44. 79. 47.45. 69. Alavus 78. 90. 77. 17. 1) ALAJÄRVI Levijoen ns, klo 20 Kaskinen 76. 22. 19. 68. Ähtäri 2) ALAJÄRVI Myllykankaan koulu, Lapuantie 842, klo 19 32) KAUHAVA Mäenpään kylä, Mäenpääntie 433, klo 20 91. 27. 20. 70. 3) ALAJÄRVI Hoiskon kyläyhd. ja maa.seura, Levijoentie 78, klo 19 33) KAUHAVA Oravankylä, Hatuntie 42, klo 19.30 18. 21. (Alajärven kokkoja myös nrot 91-93) 34) KORSNÄS Bjurbäckin kyläseura, kylätalo, klo 19.30 Karijoki Kauhajoki 4) Lahdenkylä, Yrttitie, klo 19 35) KORSNÄS Molpen paviljonki, klo 18.30 28. 16. GRAFIIKKA: HANNELE NORJA ALAHÄRMÄ 26. 23. 5) ALAHÄRMÄ Hakolan kyläyhdistys, klo 20 36) KORTESJÄRVI Kortesjärven ns, Kukkolantie 29, klo 19 Kristiinan- 6) EVIJÄRVI Sillankorvan leirintäalue, Kirkkotie 295, klo 20 37) KORTESJÄRVI Ylikylän ns, Rintalantie 37, klo 20 kaupunki Jalasjärvi Särkikylä, Ritalanpelto, klo 19.30 38) KORTESJÄRVI 7) EVIJÄRVI Pirttisen ns, Pirttisentie 311, klo 19.30 29.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Tax Revenues in Finland Tallinn 13.11.2018
    Onnistuva Suomi tehdään lähellä Finlands framgång skapas lokalt Local government tax revenues in Finland Tallinn 13.11.2018 Henrik Rainio, Director, Municipal Finances The Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities Municipalities in Finland • The responsibility of municipalities for social services, healthcare, educational and cultural services, public infrastructure as well as the organisation of other welfare services is extremely significant by international and also European standards. • Local government accounts for two-thirds of public consumption in Finland. • The ratio of the total expenditure of local government to GDP has been about 20% in recent years. • Local government employs about one fifth of the total Finnish labour force. • Municipalities have the right to tax the earned income of their inhabitants (municipal income taxation) and municipalities are paid tax on the basis of the value of real property (tax on real property). Municipalities are also entitled to a share of corporate income tax. 2 Onnistuva Suomi tehdään lähellä Finlands framgång skapas lokalt 14.11.2018 Total municipal sector expenditure and income for 2017 Salaries and Social welfare Tax revenues 51 % wages 36 % and health care 22,6 billion € 15,9 billion € 48 % 21,1 billion € Income tax 43 % Corporate tax 4 % Social security funds Real estate tax 4 % and pensions 10 % Purchase of goods 8 % Education and State grants 19 % Purcahse of Culture 31 % 8,5 billion € services 22 % 13,6 billion € Sales of goods and Subsidies 5 % services 21 % Loan costs 5 % Other 15 % 9,2 billion € Investments 11 % 6,6 billion € Borrowing 5 %, 2,4 mrd. € Financing 6 %, 2,7 billion € Other 3 % Other revenues 4 %, 1,8 mrd.
    [Show full text]
  • District 107 F.Pdf
    Club Health Assessment for District 107 F through December 2020 Status Membership Reports Finance LCIF Current YTD YTD YTD YTD Member Avg. length Months Yrs. Since Months Donations Member Members Members Net Net Count 12 of service Since Last President Vice Since Last for current Club Club Charter Count Added Dropped Growth Growth% Months for dropped Last Officer Rotation President Activity Account Fiscal Number Name Date Ago members MMR *** Report Reported Report *** Balance Year **** Number of times If below If net loss If no When Number Notes the If no report on status quo 15 is greater report in 3 more than of officers thatin 12 months within last members than 20% months one year repeat do not haveappears in two years appears appears appears in appears in terms an active red Clubs more than two years old M,MC,SC 20649 ÄHTÄRI 03/31/1965 Active 10 0 0 0 0.00% 10 1 IP 0 32745 ÄHTÄRI/OULUVESI 09/22/1976 Active 24 0 0 0 0.00% 25 1 N 0 20599 ALAHÄRMÄ 10/11/1961 Active 31 0 0 0 0.00% 31 1 N 6 MC,SC 20650 ALAJÄRVI/JÄRVISEUTU 02/26/1960 Active 34 0 0 0 0.00% 34 0 N 0 VP,MC,SC 20651 ALAVUS 03/06/1964 Active 16 0 0 0 0.00% 17 0 2 9 104719 ALAVUS/KUULATTARET 02/11/2009 Active 16 1 2 -1 -5.88% 20 5 1 N 3 M,MC,SC 36146 ALAVUS/SALMI 10/16/1978 Active 20 0 0 0 0.00% 21 1 N 19 MC,SC 20597 EVIJÄRVI 10/17/1963 Active 35 0 0 0 0.00% 38 0 N 0 MC,SC 20600 ILMAJOKI 02/25/1964 Active 26 1 0 1 4.00% 27 1 N 3 44303 ILMAJOKI/ILKKA 10/31/1984 Active 35 1 0 1 2.94% 34 0 N 0 $96.15 M,MC,SC 67723 ILMAJOKI/VILJAT 04/11/2003 Active 23 1 1 0 0.00% 21 13 1 N 2 MC 20601
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki in Early Twentieth-Century Literature Urban Experiences in Finnish Prose Fiction 1890–1940
    lieven ameel Helsinki in Early Twentieth-Century Literature Urban Experiences in Finnish Prose Fiction 1890–1940 Studia Fennica Litteraria The Finnish Literature Society (SKS) was founded in 1831 and has, from the very beginning, engaged in publishing operations. It nowadays publishes literature in the fields of ethnology and folkloristics, linguistics, literary research and cultural history. The first volume of the Studia Fennica series appeared in 1933. Since 1992, the series has been divided into three thematic subseries: Ethnologica, Folkloristica and Linguistica. Two additional subseries were formed in 2002, Historica and Litteraria. The subseries Anthropologica was formed in 2007. In addition to its publishing activities, the Finnish Literature Society maintains research activities and infrastructures, an archive containing folklore and literary collections, a research library and promotes Finnish literature abroad. Studia fennica editorial board Pasi Ihalainen, Professor, University of Jyväskylä, Finland Timo Kaartinen, Title of Docent, Lecturer, University of Helsinki, Finland Taru Nordlund, Title of Docent, Lecturer, University of Helsinki, Finland Riikka Rossi, Title of Docent, Researcher, University of Helsinki, Finland Katriina Siivonen, Substitute Professor, University of Helsinki, Finland Lotte Tarkka, Professor, University of Helsinki, Finland Tuomas M. S. Lehtonen, Secretary General, Dr. Phil., Finnish Literature Society, Finland Tero Norkola, Publishing Director, Finnish Literature Society Maija Hakala, Secretary of the Board, Finnish Literature Society, Finland Editorial Office SKS P.O. Box 259 FI-00171 Helsinki www.finlit.fi Lieven Ameel Helsinki in Early Twentieth- Century Literature Urban Experiences in Finnish Prose Fiction 1890–1940 Finnish Literature Society · SKS · Helsinki Studia Fennica Litteraria 8 The publication has undergone a peer review. The open access publication of this volume has received part funding via a Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation grant.
    [Show full text]
  • Katikankanjoni 2.0 Km | Kauhajoki
    Updated 9/2018 HIKING TRAIL Katikankanjoni | Kauhajoki, South Ostrobothnia Photo: Elina Järvinen Katikankanjoni 2.0 km | Kauhajoki The Katikankanjoni canyon is located at the upper course of Hyypänjoki River, considered as a landscape area of national value. The exceptional landscape of LEVEL OF DIFFICULTY: Challenging Katikankanjoni surprises and delights the visitor. In the TRAIL TYPE: Circle route middle of an even landscape, there is a deep canyon SUITABILITY: The trail is suitable as a day-trip with narrow ridges. In the middle of a shady spruce for- destination to all hikers in good condition. est, there is a periodically surging brook. DURATION: About 2 h including stops Katikankanjoni is a rugged place of magical beauty to SIGNPOSTING: The trail is marked with red fibre explore. When walking along the bottom of the canyon, bands. The trail track in the terrain is easily distin- you find it difficult to believe you are in South Ostro- guishable. bothnia. The steep slopes descent in some places almost vertically to the bottom of the brook valley. TO THE STARTING POINT OF THE TRAIL Starting point Katikankanjoni parking area Kiviluomantie 461, 61950 Juonikylä (Kauhajoki) A magical place (WGS84) N62° 14.36163' E22° 19.42320' Steep ascents and descents The parking area is signposted. A Lean-to at a lookout spot Part of Kauhaneva-Pohjankangas National Park Services at the beginning of the trail or along it Photo: Jennika Hakola #outdoorsep #katikankanjoni #kauhanevapohjankangas #lauhanvuoriregion #visitsuupohja #hiking Updated 9/2018 HIKING TRAIL Katikankanjoni | Kauhajoki, South Ostrobothnia Photo: Jennika Hakola Photo: Jennika Hakola Photo: Jennika Hakola Photo: Ismo Nousiainen Photo: Ismo Nousiainen TRAIL DESCRIPTION physically challenging trail suits as a day-trip destina- tion to all hikers in good condition.
    [Show full text]
  • LUETTELO Kuntien Ja Seurakuntien Tuloveroprosenteista Vuonna 2021
    Dnro VH/8082/00.01.00/2020 LUETTELO kuntien ja seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista vuonna 2021 Verohallinto on verotusmenettelystä annetun lain (1558/1995) 91 a §:n 3 momentin nojalla, sellaisena kuin se on laissa 520/2010, antanut seuraavan luettelon varainhoitovuodeksi 2021 vahvistetuista kuntien, evankelis-luterilaisen kirkon ja ortodoksisen kirkkokunnan seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista. Kunta Kunnan Ev.lut. Ortodoks. tuloveroprosentti seurakunnan seurakunnan tuloveroprosentti tuloveroprosentti Akaa 22,25 1,70 2,00 Alajärvi 21,75 1,75 2,00 Alavieska 22,00 1,80 2,10 Alavus 21,25 1,75 2,00 Asikkala 20,75 1,75 1,80 Askola 21,50 1,75 1,80 Aura 21,50 1,35 1,75 Brändö 17,75 2,00 1,75 Eckerö 19,00 2,00 1,75 Enonkoski 21,00 1,60 1,95 Enontekiö 21,25 1,75 2,20 Espoo 18,00 1,00 1,80 Eura 21,00 1,50 1,75 Eurajoki 18,00 1,60 2,00 Evijärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Finström 19,50 1,95 1,75 Forssa 20,50 1,40 1,80 Föglö 17,50 2,00 1,75 Geta 18,50 1,95 1,75 Haapajärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Haapavesi 22,00 1,80 2,00 Hailuoto 20,50 1,80 2,10 Halsua 23,50 1,70 2,00 Hamina 21,00 1,60 1,85 Hammarland 18,00 1,80 1,75 Hankasalmi 22,00 1,95 2,00 Hanko 21,75 1,60 1,80 Harjavalta 21,50 1,75 1,75 Hartola 21,50 1,75 1,95 Hattula 20,75 1,50 1,80 Hausjärvi 21,50 1,75 1,80 Heinola 20,50 1,50 1,80 Heinävesi 21,00 1,80 1,95 Helsinki 18,00 1,00 1,80 Hirvensalmi 20,00 1,75 1,95 Hollola 21,00 1,75 1,80 Huittinen 21,00 1,60 1,75 Humppila 22,00 1,90 1,80 Hyrynsalmi 21,75 1,75 1,95 Hyvinkää 20,25 1,25 1,80 Hämeenkyrö 22,00 1,70 2,00 Hämeenlinna 21,00 1,30 1,80 Ii 21,50 1,50 2,10 Iisalmi
    [Show full text]
  • Vapo Oy, Vapon Läntisen Suomen Turvetuotannon Vesistötarkkailu
    RAPORTTI 101010782 19.9.2019 VAPO OY Vapon läntisen Suomen turvetuotannon vesistötarkkailu vuonna 2018 Etelä-Pohjanmaan ELY-keskus 2 Copyright © Pöyry Finland Oy 3 Vapo Oy Läntisen Suomen turvetuotantoalueiden vesistötarkkailu, Etelä-Pohjanmaan ELY-keskus Sisältö 1 JOHDANTO ........................................................................................................................ 7 2 METEOROLOGISET JA HYDROLOGISET OLOSUHTEET ............................................... 7 2.1 Lämpötila ............................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Sadanta ............................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Lumipeite vuonna 2018 ........................................................................................................ 8 3 KÄYTTÖ- JA HOITOTARKKAILU ...................................................................................... 9 3.1 Yleistä .................................................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Vesistötarkkailun näytteenotto ............................................................................................. 9 4 VESISTÖTARKKAILUT 2018 ........................................................................................... 10 4.1 Yleistä ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]