Catalogue Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Catalogue Introduction Catalogue Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 RBGE work on Phytophthora ..................................................................... 1 Overview of Oomycetes .............................................................................................. 1 Molecular Evidence of the Evolution of Oomycetes .................................. 3 Taxonomy within Oomycetes ..................................................................... 3 Species discovery ........................................................................................................ 7 Taxonomy of Phytophthora ........................................................................ 7 Morphological taxonomy review of Phytophthora ............................. 7 Molecular taxonomy and phylogeny of Phytophthora ....................... 8 DNA Barcoding analysis........................................................................... 10 Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) ...................................................... 10 Mitochondrial DNA .......................................................................... 12 Aim and Purpose ........................................................................................................... 19 Material and Methods.................................................................................................... 20 Polymorphism Evaluation of ITS, Cox2 and Cox spacer as DNA Barcodes ............ 20 Sequence editing, alignment and analysis ................................................ 21 Identification of Phytophthora Species in RBGE ...................................................... 21 Culture of Isolates ..................................................................................... 24 Sub-culturing..................................................................................... 25 Single-spore Isolation ....................................................................... 25 DNA extraction ......................................................................................... 25 PCR recipe and program ........................................................................... 26 Cox spacer ......................................................................................... 26 ITS..................................................................................................... 26 Purification ................................................................................................ 27 Sequencing Reaction ................................................................................. 27 Sequence editing, alignment and analysis ................................................ 28 Results ........................................................................................................................... 28 PCR recipe performance ............................................................................................ 28 Barcode Evaluation .................................................................................................... 30 Intraspecific and Interspecific Distance Calculation ................................ 30 Best Match and Best Close Match ............................................................ 35 Species Identification with ITS and Cox spacer ........................................................ 37 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 40 Intra- and Interspecific Variabilities .......................................................................... 40 Barcode Evaluation, Consistency and Incongruence of Different Testing Methods..................................................................................................... 40 Species identification using different DNA barcode ................................................. 43 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 45 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... 46 Reference ....................................................................................................................... 46 Evaluation and Application of Different DNA Barcodes for Phytophthora spp. Xueyang Huang Oct. 2018 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the MSc in the Biodiversity and Taxonomy of Plants. Abstract Phytophthora is a fungal genus of Oomycetes with historical and economical importance. As an expanding genus with more than 150 species currently, accuracy of species identification is necessary for diagnosis, disease control and ecology research. Therefore, the discrimination power, usability and consistency are highly required for DNA barcodes. The purpose of the project is to evaluate ITS1, ITS2, ITS and Cox 2, Cox spacer as well as their combination based on the distribution of intra- and interspecific variation and the test on identification success. By building the phylogenetic tree using sequences with species identity and those from unknown samples collected in RBGE, the identity of these unknown samples may be settled. The probability density plot, comparison of mean variation and BM/BCM test was carried out and suggested the insufficiency of using a single locus to identify species, the incongruence of different evaluating methods was revealed. The identity of unknown samples was determined with Neighbor-joining and Parsimony tree based on ITS and Cox spacer. Incongruence of sequence identity and clustering was revealed in trees based on two barcodes, which also indicated that unreliable results of barcoding could be carried with a single locus. List of Figures and Tables Figure1. Schematic illustration of flagellar apparatus in many Oomycetes…………2 Figure2. The transitional zone found in most Oomycetes…………………………...3 Figure3. Phylograms and distance histograms for ITS and COI…………………….5 Figure4. Parsimony supertree of 37 oomycete species and 6 SAR species………….6 Figure5. Matrix spreadsheet in Lucid Builder……………………………………….8 Figure6. DNA sequence search query in Lucid Builder……………………………..8 Figure7. Phylogenetic relationships for Phytophthora isolates……………………...9 Figure8. Phylogram of 47 Phytophthora taxa and 1 Peronospora species………….11 Figure9. Parsimony tree based on the Cox1 for Phytophthora species……………..13 Figure10. Maximum parsimony tree of Phytophthora species using Cox1………...14 Figure11. Maximum parsimony tree of Phytophthora species using Cox2………...17 Figure12. Phylogenetic of Pythium and Phytophthora based on partial Cox2……..18 Figure13. Diagram of ITS and Cox spacer regions in Phytophthora……………...27 Figure14. Gel electropherograms for the amplification of Cox spacer regions…….29 Figure15. Gel electropherograms for the gradient amplification of Cox spacer……29 Figure16. Gel electropherograms for the amplification of ITS……………………..29 Figure17. Probability density distribution of the intra- and interspecific variation...31 Figure18. Mean intraspecific and interspecific variation…………………………...32 Figure19. Percentage of identification success……………………………………..36 Figure20. Comparison of ITS and Cox spacer phylograms by clade………………38 Figure21. Position of P. gonapodydes in NJ tree built with ITS and Cox spacer…..42 Figure22. Comparison of the Parsimony tree built with ITS and Cox spacer……...44 Table1. Comparison of the Parsimony tree built with ITS and Cox spacer………...21 Table2. DNA regions and PCR primers…………………………………………….27 Table3. Original PCR recipe tested adjustment on forward primer.………………..28 Table4. Original PCR program based tested Annealing time and temperature…….29 Table5. Minimum, Maximum, Mean and Std of intra/interspecific variation……...33 Table6. Mean intraspecific distance and the rank of variation of different species...35 Table7. Identification success percentage of barcodes……………………………..36 Table8. Tree-based identification of samples collected from RBGE……………….40 Evaluation and Application of Different DNA Barcodes for Phytophthora spp. Introduction As one of the most important plant pathogens, the genus Phytophthora has had profound impacts on horticulture, agriculture, forestry and conservation. Since the first description in the late 1800s by Heinrich Anton de Bary, the number of species known in the genus has doubled during the past decade due to extensive surveys in previously unexplored ecosystems and made Phytophthora a genus with high-speed expansion, containing more than 150 species for now (Yang et al. 2017), costing billions of economic lost each year. RBGE work on Phytophthora Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh has contributed to taxonomy and pathogen control basing on the systematic research in the main garden and subordinate unit. The diversity of plant species and complexity of community has also provided a great range of host for Phytophthora. In 2017, GIS map of Phytophthora species in Botanic Garden Edinburgh was accomplished by Malcolm Gibson (Gibson, 2017), combining the historic distribution and identification on both morphology and molecular (ITS2) level. The Phytophthora Database of RBGE has also been established, exporting sampling method, origin and phenotypic records which could provide considerable material for further study. Pathological research on P. kernoviae and P. ramorum based on Benmore Botanic Garden, a satellite unit of RBGE has suggested that P. ramorum was detected in spore
Recommended publications
  • Uloga Gljiva I Gljivama Sličnih Organizama U Odumiranju Poljskoga Jasena (Fraxinus Angustifolia Vahl) U Posavskim Nizinskim Šumama U Republici Hrvatskoj
    Uloga gljiva i gljivama sličnih organizama u odumiranju poljskoga jasena (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl) u posavskim nizinskim šumama u Republici Hrvatskoj Kranjec, Jelena Doctoral thesis / Disertacija 2017 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Forestry / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Šumarski fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:108:239470 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-10-07 Repository / Repozitorij: University of Zagreb Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology ŠUMARSKI FAKULTET Jelena Kranjec ULOGA GLJIVA I GLJIVAMA SLIČNIH ORGANIZAMA U ODUMIRANJU POLJSKOGA JASENA (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl) U POSAVSKIM NIZINSKIM ŠUMAMA U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ DOKTORSKI RAD Zagreb, 2017. FACULTY OF FORESTRY Jelena Kranjec THE ROLE OF FUNGI AND FUNGUS-LIKE ORGANISMS IN DIEBACK OF NARROW- LEAVED ASH (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl) IN POSAVINA LOWLAND FORESTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA DOCTORAL THESIS Zagreb, 2017 ŠUMARSKI FAKULTET Jelena Kranjec ULOGA GLJIVA I GLJIVAMA SLIČNIH ORGANIZAMA U ODUMIRANJU POLJSKOGA JASENA (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl) U POSAVSKIM NIZINSKIM ŠUMAMA U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ DOKTORSKI RAD Mentor: prof.dr.sc. Danko Diminić Zagreb, 2017. FACULTY OF FORESTRY Jelena Kranjec THE ROLE OF FUNGI AND FUNGUS-LIKE ORGANISMS IN DIEBACK OF NARROW- LEAVED ASH (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl) IN POSAVINA LOWLAND FORESTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA DOCTORAL THESIS Supervisor: prof. Danko Diminić, Ph.D. Zagreb, 2017 KLJUČNA DOKUMENTACIJSKA KARTICA Uloga gljiva i gljivama sličnih organizama u odumiranju poljskoga jasena TI (naslov) (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl) u posavskim nizinskim šumama u Republici Hrvatskoj AU (autor) Jelena Kranjec Vladimira Nazora 59b, Sveti Ivan Zelina, Hrvatska, email: AD (adresa) [email protected] Šumarska knjižnica, Šumarski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu SO (izvor) Svetošimunska 25, 10002 Zagreb PY (godina objave) 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Species of Phytophthora Associated with a Native Ecosystem in Gauteng
    Species of Phytophthora associated with a native ecosystem in Gauteng by Jan Hendrik Nagel BSc Genetics (Hons) Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae In the Faculty of Natural & Agricultural Sciences, Department of Genetics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria September 2012 Supervisor: Dr. Marieka Gryzenhout Co-supervisors: Prof. Bernard Slippers Prof. Michael J. Wingfield i Declaration I, Jan Hendrik Nagel, declare that the thesis/dissertation, which I hereby submit for the degree Magister Scientiae at the University of Pretoria, is my own work and has not previously been submitted by me for a degree at this or any other tertiary institution. SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE: ________________________________ ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 PREFACE 2 CHAPTER 1 4 DIVERSITY , SPECIES RECOGNITION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETECTION OF Phytophthora spp. 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. THE OOMYCETES 7 2.1. OOMYCETES VERSUS FUNGI 7 2.2. TAXONOMY OF OOMYCETES 7 2.3. DIVERSITY AND IMPACT OF OOMYCETES 9 2.4. IMPACT OF Phytophthora 11 3. SPECIES RECOGNITION IN Phytophthora 13 3.1. MORPHOLOGICAL SPECIES CONCEPT 14 3.2. BIOLOGICAL SPECIES CONCEPT 14 3.3. PHYLOGENETIC SPECIES CONCEPT 15 4. STUDYING Phytophthora IN NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS 17 4.1. ISOLATION AND CULTURE OF Phytophthora 17 4.2. MOLECULAR DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUES FOR Phytophthora 19 4.3. RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM (RFLP) 19 4.4. SINGLE -STRAND CONFORMATION POLYMORPHISM (SSCP) 20 4.5. PCR DETECTION WITH SPECIES -SPECIFIC PRIMERS 21 4.6. QUANTATIVE PCR 22 4.7. DNA HYBRIDIZATION BASED TECHNIQUES 23 4.8. SEROLOGICAL TECHNIQUES 24 4.9. PCR AMPLIFICATION WITH GENUS SPECIFIC PRIMERS 25 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Wetland Plants for Susceptibility To
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2013 Evaluation of wetland plants for susceptibility to species of Phytophthora present in runoff water at ornamental plant nurseries Garrett Ridge Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Plant Pathology Commons Recommended Citation Ridge, Garrett, "Evaluation of wetland plants for susceptibility to species of Phytophthora present in runoff aw ter at ornamental plant nurseries" (2013). All Theses. 1671. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1671 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EVALUATION OF WETLAND PLANTS FOR SUSCEPTIBILITY TO SPECIES OF PHYTOPHTHORA PRESENT IN RUNOFF WATER AT ORNAMENTAL PLANT NURSERIES A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Plant and Environmental Sciences by Garrett A. Ridge May 2013 Accepted by: Dr. Sarah A. White, Committee Chair Dr. Steven N. Jeffers Dr. Christina E. Wells Dr. William C. Bridges, Jr. ABSTRACT Competition between agricultural producers and urban communities for high quality water is increasing; therefore, growers need to adopt water conservation and reuse practices to ensure an adequate supply of irrigation water. One concern with recycled irrigation water is the potential to recirculate propagules of oomycete pathogens. Constructed wetlands are a biologically-based treatment option for nutrient and chemical remediation that potentially also could filter pathogen propagules.
    [Show full text]
  • New Pest Response Guidelines Phytophthora Species in the Environment and Nursery Settings
    United States Department of New Pest Response Agriculture Marketing and Guidelines Regulatory Programs Animal and Phytophthora species in the Environment and Nursery Plant Health Settings Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine Cooperating State Departments of Agriculture July 09, 2010 i Phytophthora spp. New Pest Response Guidelines Phytophthora species in the Environment and Nursery Settings The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of any individuals income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication o program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720- 6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. This document is not intended to be complete and exhaustive. It provides a foundation based upon available literature to assist in the development of appropriate and relevant regulatory activities. Some key publications were not available at the time of writing, and not all specialists and members of the research community were consulted in the preparation of this document. References to commercial suppliers or products should not be construed as an endorsement of the company or product by the USDA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Phytophthora; Phylogeny, Speciation and Host Specificity
    The genus Phytophthora; phylogeny, speciation and host specificity Laurens P.N.M. Kroon Thesis committee Thesis supervisors Prof. dr. ir. F.P.M. Govers Personal chair at the Laboratory of Phytopathology Wageningen University Prof. dr. ir. P.J.G.M. de Wit Professor of Phytopathology Wageningen University Thesis co-supervisor Dr. ir. W.G. Flier Technical Manager Benelux DuPont, Dordrecht Other members Prof. dr. P.W. Crous, CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht Prof. dr. R.F. Hoekstra, Wageningen University Dr. D.E.L. Cooke, SCRI, Invergowrie, Scotland Dr. ir. J. Helder, Wageningen University This research was conducted under the auspices of the Graduate School of Experimental Plant Sciences The genus Phytophthora; phylogeny, speciation and host specificity Laurens P.N.M. Kroon Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Wednesday 16 June 2010 at 1.30 p.m. in the Aula Laurens P.N.M. Kroon The genus Phytophthora; phylogeny, speciation and host specificity 184 pages. Thesis Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2010) With references, with summaries in Dutch and English ISBN 978-90-8585-668-9 Table of contents 1 General introduction 7 2 The Phytophthora phylogeny 2.1 Introduction 24 2.2 Phylogenetic analysis of Phytophthora species based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences 29 2.3 The Phytophthora genus anno 2010 53 2.4 References 65 3 Phytophthora clade 1c: hybrids and new species 3.1 Inheritance of host specificity in hybrid progeny of the oomycete pathogens Phytophthora infestans and Phytophthora mirabilis 74 3.2 Genetic diversity of Phytophthora infestans sensu lato in Ecuador provides new insight into the origin of this important plant pathogen 90 3.3 Phytophthora andina sp.
    [Show full text]