DOCSLIB.ORG

Half-Yearly Human Rights Monitoring Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Half-Yearly Human Rights Monitoring Report Half-yearly Human Rights Monitoring Report January - June 2018 Date of Release: 1 July 2018 1 Foreword Odhikar has been monitoring the human rights situation in Bangladesh in order to promote and protect civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights of Bangladeshi citizens and to report on violations and defend the victims since 1994. Odhikar does not believe that the human rights movement merely endeavours to protect the „individual‟ from violations perpetrated by the state; rather, it believes that the movement to establish the rights and dignity of every individual is part of the struggle to constitute Bangladesh as a democratic state. Odhikar has always been consistent in creating mass awareness of human rights issues using several means, including reporting violations perpetrated by the State and advocacy and campaign to ensure internationally recognised civil and political rights of citizens. The Organisation unconditionally stands by the victims of oppression and maintains no prejudice with regard to political leanings or ideological orientation, race, religion or sex. Odhikar has been facing extreme repression and harassment by the incumbent government while working on human rights since 2013. Despite facing persecution, harassment and threats to its existence, the Organisation has prepared monthly human rights monitoring reports based on information gathered by grassroots human rights defenders associated with Odhikar and also collected from the national dailies. This report is a brief analysis of the Odhikar‟s monthly reports published in the first six months of 2018. Although many incidents of human rights violations occur every month, only a few significant incidents have been highlighted in this report. 2 Contents Statistics of Human Rights Violations: January-June 2018 ............................................................. 4 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 5 Main Report .................................................................................................................................... 9 A. State Repression and Impunity ................................................................................................... 9 Extrajudicial killings ..................................................................................................................... 9 Enforced disappearances .......................................................................................................... 10 Torture and lack of accountability of law enforcement agencies ............................................. 13 Prison conditions ....................................................................................................................... 14 Political repression and hindrance to freedom of assembly ..................................................... 15 Criminalisation of ruling party .................................................................................................. 18 B. Public Lynching ......................................................................................................................... 20 C. ‘Extremism’ and Human Rights ................................................................................................. 20 D. Dysfunctional State Institutions ............................................................................................... 21 Anti Corruption Commission ..................................................................................................... 21 Election Commission .................................................................................................................. 23 Local government and by-elections .......................................................................................... 24 Khulna and Gazipur City Corporation elections ........................................................................ 24 E. Freedom of Expression and Freedom of the Media ................................................................. 28 Repressive laws ......................................................................................................................... 28 Freedom of the media ............................................................................................................... 29 F. Workers’ Rights ......................................................................................................................... 31 Situation of workers in the formal sector .................................................................................. 31 Situation of workers in the informal sector ............................................................................... 32 Situation of women migrant workers ....................................................................................... 32 G. Relation with Neighbouring Countries: India and Myanmar ................................................... 33 Aggressive policy of India towards Bangladesh ........................................................................ 33 Acts of genocide against Rohingyas in Myanmar ..................................................................... 35 H. Violence against Women .......................................................................................................... 38 I. Child Marriage Restraint Act, 2017 promotes child marriage ................................................... 40 J. Hindrance to human rights activities of Odhikar ...................................................................... 40 K. Recommendations .................................................................................................................... 42 3 Statistics of Human Rights Violations: January-June 2018 Statistics: January-June 2018* Type of Human Rights Violation January February March April May June Total Crossfire 18 6 17 28 149 50 268 Extrajudici Shot to death 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 al killings Torture to death 0 0 1 1 2 0 4 Total 19 7 18 29 151 50 274 Enforced Disappearances 6 1 5 2 1 1 16 Death in Jail 6 5 9 7 8 5 40 Bangladeshis Killed 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 Human Bangladeshis 3 5 1 2 0 1 12 rights Injured violations Bangladeshis by Indian 2 0 0 3 4 0 9 BSF Abducted Total 7 6 1 5 4 1 24 Injured 12 6 1 2 3 1 25 Attack on Assaulted 1 3 3 0 0 0 7 journalists Threatened 2 1 3 0 1 1 8 Total 15 10 7 2 4 2 40 Political Killed 9 5 9 11 13 2 49 violence Injured 619 424 335 428 297 153 2256 Dowry related violence against 12 16 15 21 11 6 81 women Rape 46 78 67 69 58 45 363 Sexual harassment /Stalking of 15 14 25 24 19 5 102 females Acid violence 2 1 3 4 2 0 12 Public lynching 5 6 8 2 5 2 28 RMG Killed 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 workers Injured 20 0 40 0 35 27 122 Situation of workers Workers Killed 9 11 7 8 18 7 60 in other sectors Injured 8 4 0 3 4 3 22 Arrest under Information and Communication Technology Act 2 1 0 0 3 0 6 2006 (amended 2009 and 2013)** *Odhikar's documentation ** The cases of arrests under the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Act that are documented are those where the presentations/statements in question are considered critical against high officials of the government and their families. 4 Executive Summary 1. The human rights situation of the first six months of 2018 has been analyzed through this report. The said report contains issues relating to right to freedom of expression, deprivation of right to life and personal liberty and infringement of democracy. The human rights situation of the country was found to be deteriorating alarmingly in the last six months due to the aggressive attitude and repressive acts of the government. The Awami League led Alliance government remains in power since 2009, thus the human rights violations of 2018 are a continuation of the trend that commenced in 2009. After assuming power Awami League was involved in massive human rights violations and is continuously doing so. In the last 10 years the incumbent government has politicized various important government and independent institutions and made them subservient to it. The government unilaterally removed the Caretaker Government system in 2011, ignoring protests from the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), civil society and other political parties, without any referendum, through the 15th Amendment to the Constitution, which created a deep political crisis. Almost all political parties, including BNP (except Awami League and its alliance) boycotted elections in protest of the removal of the caretaker government system. As a result, the Awami League reassumed power for a second term through controversial and farcical Parliamentary Elections1 on 5 January 2014 and it has created a fearful environment in the country by severely violating civil and political rights of the citizens. During the tenure of the present government, many people, including leaders and activists of opposition political parties and dissenting voices became victims of persecution, enforced disappearance, torture, extrajudicial killing and kneecapping. Furthermore, rights to freedom of opinion and expression; and assembly and association were violated and several repressive laws were enacted and amended by the government during its reign. In the first six months of the current year, the government was involved in massive extrajudicial killings on the pretext of „anti- 1 The Caretaker Government system was incorporated in the Constitution through the 13th amendment to the Constitution,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BANGABANDHU SHEIKH MUJIB SHILPANAGAR Mirsarai-Sitakundu-Sonagazi Chattogram-Feni
    BANGABANDHU SHEIKH MUJIB SHILPANAGAR Mirsarai-Sitakundu-Sonagazi Chattogram-Feni Bangladesh Economic Zones Authority (BEZA) BANGABANDHU SHEIKH MUJIB SHILPANAGAR EDITORIAL BOARD Paban Chowdhury, Executive Chairman, BEZA Md. Harunur Rashid, Executive Member, BEZA Mohammad Hasan Arif, General Manager, BEZA Shenjuti Barua, Deputy Manager, BEZA Md. Abdul Quader Khan, Social Consultant, BEZA PUBLISHED IN May 2020 PUBLISHER Bangladesh Economic Zones Authority (BEZA) Prime Minister’s Office DESIGN AND PRINTING Nymphea Publication © Bangladesh Economic Zones Authority (BEZA) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying recording or otherwise without prior permission of the publisher. The book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover, other than that in which it is published. 4 Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Shilpanagar gyw³i msMªv‡gi †P‡qI †`k Movi msMÖvg KwVb, ZvB †`k Movi Kv‡R Avgv‡`i me©kw³ wb‡qvM Ki‡Z n‡e - e½eÜz †kL gywReyi ingvb PRIME MINISTER Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh 10 Falgun 1426 MESSAGE 23 February 2020 I am happy to know that Bangladesh Economic Zones Authority (BEZA) is the establishment of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Shilpanagar (BSMSN) publishing a book on the development scenario of Bangabandhu Shekih comprising Mirsarai, Feni and Sitakunda Economic Zones, on 30,000 Mujib Shilpanagar (BSMSN) covering some excellent accomplishments acres of land has created a hilarious prospect among the local and experienced so far.
    [Show full text]
  • SELF-DETERMINATION OUTSIDE the COLONIAL CONTEXT: the BIRTH of BANGLADESH in Retrospectt
    SELF-DETERMINATION OUTSIDE THE COLONIAL CONTEXT: THE BIRTH OF BANGLADESH IN RETROSPECTt By VedP. Nanda* I. INTRODUCTION In the aftermath of the Indo-Pakistan War in December 1971, the independent nation-state of Bangladesh was born.' Within the next four months, more than fifty countries had formally recognized the new nation.2 As India's military intervention was primarily responsible for the success of the secessionist movement in what was then known as East Pakistan, and for the creation of a new political entity on the inter- national scene,3 many serious questions stemming from this historic event remain unresolved for the international lawyer. For example: (1) What is the continuing validity of Article 2 (4) of the United Nations Charter?4 (2) What is the current status of the doctrine of humanita- rian intervention in international law?5 (3) What action could the United Nations have taken to avert the Bangladesh crisis?6 (4) What measures are necessary to prevent such tragic occurrences in the fu- ture?7 and (5) What relationship exists between the principle of self- "- This paper is an adapted version of a chapter that will appear in Y. ALEXANDER & R. FRIEDLANDER, SELF-DETERMINATION (1979). * Professor of Law and Director of the International Legal Studies Program, Univer- sity of Denver Law Center. 1. See generally BANGLADESH: CRISIS AND CONSEQUENCES (New Delhi: Deen Dayal Research Institute 1972); D. MANKEKAR, PAKISTAN CUT TO SIZE (1972); PAKISTAN POLITI- CAL SYSTEM IN CRISIS: EMERGENCE OF BANGLADESH (S. Varma & V. Narain eds. 1972). 2. Ebb Tide, THE ECONOMIST, April 8, 1972, at 47.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Case List
    FRONT COVER 1 3 PEN INTERNATIONAL CHARTER The PEN Charter is based on resolutions passed at its International Congresses and may be summarised as follows: PEN affirms that: 1. Literature knows no frontiers and must remain common currency among people in spite of political or international upheavals. 2. In all circumstances, and particularly in time of war, works of art, the patrimony of humanity at large, should be left untouched by national or political passion. 3. Members of PEN should at all times use what influence they have in favour of good understanding and mutual respect between nations; they pledge themselves to do their utmost to dispel race, class and national hatreds, and to champion the ideal of one humanity living in peace in one world. 4. PEN stands for the principle of unhampered transmission of thought within each nation and between all nations, and members pledge themselves to oppose any form of suppression of freedom of expression in the country and community to which they belong, as well as throughout the world wherever this is possible. PEN declares for a free press and opposes arbitrary censorship in time of peace. It believes that the necessary advance of the world towards a more highly organised political and economic order renders a free criticism of governments, administrations and institutions imperative. And since freedom implies voluntary restraint, members pledge themselves to oppose such evils of a free press as mendacious publication, deliberate falsehood and distortion of facts for political and personal ends. Membership of PEN is open to all qualified writers, editors and translators who subscribe to these aims, without regard to nationality, ethnic origin, language, colour or religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © and Moral Rights for This Phd Thesis Are Retained by the Author And/Or Other Copyright Owners
    Khan, Adeeba Aziz (2015) Electoral institutions in Bangladesh : a study of conflicts between the formal and the informal. PhD Thesis. SOAS, University of London. http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/id/eprint/23587 Copyright © and Moral Rights for this PhD Thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This PhD Thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this PhD Thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the PhD Thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full PhD Thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD PhD Thesis, pagination. Electoral Institutions in Bangladesh: A Study of Conflicts Between the Formal and the Informal Adeeba Aziz Khan Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD in Law 2015 Department of Law SOAS, University of London I have read and understood regulation 17.9 of the Regulations for students of the SOAS, University of London concerning plagiarism. I undertake that all the material presented for examination is my own work and has not been written for me, in whole or in part, by any other person. I also undertake that any quotation or paraphrase from the published or unpublished work of another person has been duly acknowledged in the work which I present for examination.
    [Show full text]
  • CPD-CMI Working Paper Series Finance for Local Government in Bangladesh an Elusive Agenda 6
    CPD-CMI Working Paper Series 6 Finance for Local Government in Bangladesh An Elusive Agenda Debapriya Bhattacharya Mobasser Monem Umme Shefa Rezbana CENTRE FOR POLICY DIALOGUE (CPD) B A N G L A D E S H a c i v i l s o c i e t y t h i n k t a n k Absorbing Innovative Financial Flows: Looking at Asia FINANCE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN BANGLADESH An Elusive Agenda CPD-CMI Working Paper 6 Debapriya Bhattacharya Mobasser Monem Umme Shefa Rezbana Dr Debapriya Bhattacharya is a Distinguished Fellow at the Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD); Dr Mobasser Monem is Professor, Department of Public Administration, University of Dhaka and Ms Umme Shefa Rezbana is Research Associate, CPD. i CPD Working Paper 000 Publishers Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD) House 40C, Road 32, Dhanmondi R/A Dhaka 1209, Bangladesh Telephone: (+88 02) 8124770, 9126402, 9141703, 9141734 Fax: (+88 02) 8130951; E-mail: [email protected] Website: cpd.org.bd Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) Jekteviksbakken 31, 5006 Bergen, Norway P.O. Box 6033 Bedriftssenteret, N-5892 Bergen, Norway Telephone: (+47 47) 93 80 00; Fax: (+47 47) 93 80 01 E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.cmi.no First Published November 2013 © Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD) Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of CPD or CMI. Tk. 90 USD 6 ISSN 2225-8175 (Online) ISSN 2225-8035 (Print) Cover Design Avra Bhattacharjee CCM42013_3WP6_DGP ii Absorbing Innovative Financial Flows: Looking at Asia The present Working Paper Series emerged from a joint collaborative programme being implemented by the Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD), Dhaka, Bangladesh and the Chr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bangladesh – Hindus – Awami League – Bengali Language
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: BGD30821 Country: Bangladesh Date: 8 November 2006 Keywords: Bangladesh – Hindus – Awami League – Bengali language This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Questions 1. Are Hindus a minority religion in Bangladesh? 2. How are religious minorities, notably Hindus, treated in Bangladesh? 3. Is the Awami League traditionally supported by the Hindus in Bangladesh? 4. Are Hindu supporters of the Awami League discriminated against and if so, by whom? 5. Are there parts of Bangladesh where Hindus enjoy more safety? 6. Is Bengali the language of Bangladeshis? RESPONSE 1. Are Hindus a minority religion in Bangladesh? Hindus constitute approximately 10 percent of the population in Bangladesh making them a religious minority. Sunni Muslims constitute around 88 percent of the population and Buddhists and Christians make up the remainder of the religious minorities. The Hindu minority in Bangladesh has progressively diminished since partition in 1947 from approximately 25 percent of the population to its current 10 percent (US Department of State 2006, International Religious Freedom Report for 2006 – Bangladesh, 15 September – Attachment 1). 2. How are religious minorities, notably Hindus, treated in Bangladesh? In general, minorities in Bangladesh have been consistently mistreated by the government and Islamist extremists. Specific discrimination against the Hindu minority intensified immediately following the 2001 national elections when the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) gained victory with its four-party coalition government, including two Islamic parties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Threat of Student Movements in Bangladesh: Injustice, Infiltrators and Regime Change
    ESID Working Paper No. 125 The threat of student movements in Bangladesh: Injustice, infiltrators and regime change David Jackman1 August 2019 1 SOAS Email correspondence: [email protected] ISBN: 978-1-912593-28-6 email: [email protected] Effective States and Inclusive Development Research Centre (ESID) Global Development Institute, School of Environment, Education and Development, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK www.effective-states.org The threat of student movements in Bangladesh: Injustice, infiltrators and regime change Abstract For decades, large-scale political mobilisation in Bangladesh has been monopolised by deep-rooted and often violent political parties. Over the past decade, however, the opposition has been suppressed, leaving them unable to wage the strikes and protests typical of the country’s politics. Alongside their decline has been a resurgence of street movement beyond conventional political boundaries. These movements are unpredictable, coalesce around issues of injustice, and emerge in particular from urban students. This article examines the movements for reform to civil service quotas, and for improved road safety, seen primarily in Dhaka in 2018. Such movements pose two principal threats to the ruling party: first, they have the potential to undermine their legitimacy and create a moment of crisis on which the opposition could capitalise; second, they can exacerbate tensions between interest groups on whom the ruling party rely to maintain power. The state response of concessions and repression reflects these threats and the delicate balance of maintaining legitimacy while using coercion. With a rich history of political movements and a lack of alternative channels for political expression, responding to grievances that can motivate such movements will be an important challenge for the ruling party to maintain their grip on power.
    [Show full text]
  • Urgent Appeal - the Observatory
    1 URGENT APPEAL - THE OBSERVATORY BGD 001 / 0517 / OBS 051 Arbitrary detention / Judicial harassment Bangladesh May 12, 2017 The Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders, a partnership of the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) and FIDH, requests your urgent intervention in the following situation in Bangladesh. Brief description of the information: The Observatory has been informed by reliable sources about the arbitrary detention of two journalists associated with the human rights non-governmental organisation (NGO) Odhikar, Messrs. Hasan Ali, a Kushtia District correspondent for Bangla Vision TV, and Aslam Ali, a staff reporter for Dainik Kushtia Dorpan. According to the information received, on May 9, 2017, Messrs. Hasan Ali and Aslam Ali were taken into custody after surrendering before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate at Kushtia District under Section 57(2) of the Information and Communication Technology Act 2006 (ICT ACT - amended in 2009 and 2013)1. At the time of publication of this Urgent Appeal, both remained detained in Kushtia District Jail. On March 30, 2017, Mr. Hasibur Rahman Riju, a police informer, filed a complaint at Kushtia Model Police Station against Messrs. Hasan Ali and Aslam Ali. He accused them of publishing an offensive post under the Facebook name ‘Sultan Eslam’ by using the cell phone of a worker at a tea stall at Thana Mor of Kushtia town. Mr. Hasibur Rahman Riju alleged that the post defamed him and violated Section 57(2) of ICT Act. On the same day, police Sub-Inspector Azizur Rahman arrested Messrs. Hasan Ali and Aslam Ali, along with Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • RRTA 410 (7 May 2009)
    0901219 [2009] RRTA 410 (7 May 2009) DECISION RECORD RRT CASE NUMBER: 0901219 DIAC REFERENCE: CLF2008/147994 COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Bangladesh TRIBUNAL MEMBER: Ms Philippa McIntosh DATE: 7 May 2009 PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney DECISION: The Tribunal remits the matter for reconsideration with the direction that the applicant satisfies s.36(2)(a) of the Migration Act, being a person to whom Australia has protection obligations under the Refugees Convention. STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS APPLICATION FOR REVIEW 1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship to refuse to grant the applicant a Protection (Class XA) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). 2. The applicant, who claims to be a citizen of Bangladesh, arrived in Australia and applied to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship for a Protection (Class XA) visa. The delegate decided to refuse to grant the visa and notified the applicant of the decision and his review rights by letter. 3. The delegate refused the visa application on the basis that the applicant is not a person to whom Australia has protection obligations under the Refugees Convention. 4. The applicant applied to the Tribunal for review of the delegate’s decision. 5. The Tribunal finds that the delegate’s decision is an RRT-reviewable decision under s.411(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal finds that the applicant has made a valid application for review under s.412 of the Act. RELEVANT LAW 6. Under s.65(1) a visa may be granted only if the decision maker is satisfied that the prescribed criteria for the visa have been satisfied.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Food and Disaster Management
    Situation Report Disaster Management Information Centre Disaster Management Bureau (DMB) Ministry of Food and Disaster Management Disaster Management and Relief Bhaban (6th Floor) 92-93 Mohakhali C/A, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh Phone: +88-02-9890937, Fax: +88-02-9890854 Email: [email protected] ,H [email protected] Web: http://www.cdmp.org.bdH ,H www.dmb.gov.bd Emergency Flood Situation Title: Emergency Bangladesh Location: 20°22'N-26°36'N, 87°48'E-92°41'E, Covering From: TUE-02-SEP-2008:1200 Period: To: WED-03-SEP-2008:1200 Transmission Date/Time: WED-03-SEP-2008:1500 Prepared by: DMIC, DMB Flood, Rainfall, River Situation and Summary of Water Levels Current Situation: Flood situation in the north and north-eastern part of the country is likely to improve further. The mighty Brahmaputra – Jamuna started falling. More low lying areas in some districts are likely to inundate by next 24-48 hours. FLOOD, RAINFALL AND RIVER SITUATION SUMMARY (as on September 3, 2008) Flood Outlook • Flood situation in the north and north-eastern part of the country is likely to improve further in the next 24- 48 hrs. • The mighty Brahmaputra –Jamuna started falling at all the monitoring stations and is likely to improve further in the next 24-48 hrs. • The confluence of both the rivers (the Padma at Goalundo & Bhagyakul) will continue rising at moderate rate for next 2-3 days. • More low lying areas in the districts of Chandpur, Serajganj, Tangail, Munshiganj, Manikganj, Faridpur, Madaripur, Shariatpur, Dohar & Nawabganj of Dhaka district, Shibganj & Sadar of Chapai-Nawabganj district is likely to inundate by next 24-48 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • AATA 3541 (14 March 2016)
    5KIPGFD[#WUV.++ 1418185 (Refugee) [2016] AATA 3541 (14 March 2016) DECISION RECORD DIVISION: Migration & Refugee Division CASE NUMBER: 1418185 COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Bangladesh MEMBER: Tania Flood DATE: 14 March 2016 PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney DECISION: The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Protection visa. Statement made on 14 March 2016 at 9:38am Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant. 4GVTKGXGFHTQO#WUV.++QP,WN[CV 8GTKH[XGTUKQP 5KIPGFD[#WUV.++ STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS APPLICATION FOR REVIEW 1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Protection visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). 2. The applicant, who claims to be a citizen of Bangladesh, applied for the visa [in] September 2013 and the delegate refused to grant the visa [in] October 2014. 3. The applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 2 March 2016 to give evidence and present arguments. The Tribunal hearing was conducted with the assistance of an interpreter in the Bengali and English languages. 4. The applicant was represented in relation to the review by his registered migration agent. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE 5. The criteria for a protection visa are set out in s.36 of the Act and Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
    [Show full text]
  • A Second Coming: the Specular and the Spectacular 50 Years On1
    Südasien-Chronik - South Asia Chronicle 10/2020, pp. 31-58 © Südasien- Seminar der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin ISBN: 978-3-86004-346-2 A Second Coming: The Specular and the Spectacular 50 Years On1 NUSRAT SABINA CHOWDHURY [email protected] KEYWORDS: BIRTH, DEATH, MIMESIS, MONUMENTALITY, POLITICAL AESTHETICS, BANGLADESH 31 The clocks were ticking away, the countdown had begun. Digital clocks high and bright enough for maximum visibility hung from office buildings, schools, and shops. Dhaka was one of twelve city corporations spread over fifty districts where they had been installed since early 2020. The clocks would go on until 17 March, the birth centennial of jatir pita, "The Father of the Nation", Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. They stopped at the precise mom- ent when all values—day, hour, minute, and second—turned zero. There it was, the moment of origin; of Mujib, for sure, but also of Bangladesh. A birth foretold, as it were. Birth (and death, too, as we shall see) has been a powerful motif in politics in Bangladesh in the second decade of the twenty-first century. Chronologies collided in felicitous ways; the country geared up for unforeseen pomp and circumstance. Bangabandhu (Friend of Bengal), an epithet once popularly mandated and decades later officially dictated, was the centre of the celebrations in a polity inching towards another significant temporal marker—the fiftieth year of its independence. 2020 was (officially) Mujib Borsho, the Mujib Year; 2021 marked the historic half century of Bangladesh that still considered itself young around its bigger, older, venerable neighbours. With international guests invited, shows, concerts, FOCUS and fireworks scheduled, and Mujib’s return to the newly liberated country re-staged in real time, the anniversary was to be a no-holds-barred performance.
    [Show full text]