October 22, 2012 the Honorable Tom Vilsack Secretary, U.S. Department

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

October 22, 2012 the Honorable Tom Vilsack Secretary, U.S. Department October 22, 2012 The Honorable Tom Vilsack The Honorable Lisa Jackson Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The Honorable Steven Chu Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy The Honorable Ray LaHood Secretary, U.S. Department of The Honorable Leon Panetta Transportation Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense Dear Secretary Vilsack, Secretary Chu, Secretary Panetta, Administrator Jackson, and Secretary LaHood, As scientists in the fields of ecology, wildlife biology, forestry, and natural resources, we are writing to bring your attention to the importance of working proactively to prevent potential ecological and economic damages associated with the potential spread of invasive bioenergy feedstocks. While we appreciate the steps that federal agencies have made to identify and promote renewable energy sources and to invest in second and third generation sources of bioenergy, we strongly encourage you to consider the invasive potential of all novel feedstock species, cultivars, and hybrids before providing incentives leading to their cultivation. Studies have shown that some of the plants considered most promising in terms of bioenergy capacity may actually be highly invasive and potentially harmful to native species and ecosystems.1,2,3,4 In fact, many of the characteristics that make a plant appealing as an ideal source of biomass such as ease of establishment, rapid growth, resistance to pests and diseases, and low input requirements, are the same characteristics that make a plant more likely to become invasive.5,6 According to the non-federal members of Invasive Species Advisory Committee that provide independent advice to the National Invasive Species Council, “Absent strategic mitigation efforts, there is substantial risk that some biofuels crops will escape cultivation and cause socio-economic and/or ecological harm.”7 Many of today’s most problematic invasive plants – from kudzu to purple loosestrife – were intentionally imported and released into the environment for horticultural, agricultural, conservation, and forestry purposes. These invasive species already cost billions of dollars a year in the United States8 and are one of the primary threats to North America’s native species and ecosystems. It is imperative that we learn from our past mistakes by preventing intentional introduction of energy crops that may create the next invasive species catastrophe – particularly when introductions are funded by taxpayer dollars. Under Executive Order 13112, a federal agency cannot “authorize, fund, or carry out actions that it believes are likely to cause or promote the introduction or spread of invasive species in the United States or elsewhere unless, pursuant to guidelines that it has prescribed, the agency has determined and made public its determination that the benefits of such actions clearly outweigh the potential harm caused by invasive species; and that all feasible and prudent measures to minimize risk of harm will be taken in conjunction with the actions.” To ensure ongoing compliance with the Executive Order and to prevent unintended consequences from the promotion of non-native and modified plants, algae, and microorganisms, we therefore request that federal agencies clearly assess the invasion risk of bioenergy feedstocks (including hybrids, varieties, genetically modified organisms, and cultivars) before these feedstocks can be eligible for federal incentives leading to their cultivation (through mandates, purchases, research grants, loans, and other means). Those species that may become invasive in the United States should be ineligible for incentives, unless the risk is low and, at a minimum, prudent measures are available and mandated to reduce the invasion risk and potential for harm. Tools for assessing the invasiveness of plant species and cultivars are widely available, including USDA APHIS’s newly revamped weed risk assessment.9 The National Invasive Species Council is best suited to coordinate this assessment process. A thoughtful, consistent, proactive approach to sustainable bioenergy production that avoids potentially invasive feedstocks, while encouraging the development and implementation of new energy crops to meet U.S. renewable energy goals, would demonstrate wise stewardship of federal funds and serve to benefit the agencies in the long run. By assessing and reducing risks up front, we can minimize the potential for bioenergy crops that are promoted with taxpayer dollars to become invasive and cause harm to natural ecosystems. It is much cheaper and easier to take the steps to prevent an invasive escape than it is to deal with it after it has occurred. Signed, Richard N. Mack, Ph.D. Bruce Robertson, Ph.D. Washington State University Bard College Pullman, WA Annandale-on-Hudson, NY Dale Gawlik, Ph.D., Wildlife Sciences James Miller, Ph.D. President, FL Chapter of the Wildlife Society Professor Emeritus Florida Atlantic University Mississippi State University Boca Raton, FL Starkville, MS Joseph M. DiTomaso, Ph.D. Scott L. Collins, Ph.D. University of California President, Ecological Society of America Davis, CA Washington, DC S. Raghu, Ph.D. Rakesh S. Chandran, Ph.D. Stuttgart, AR Extension Weed Specialist & Professor West Virginia University Lee Van Wychen, Ph.D. Morgantown, WV Weed Science Society of America Alexandria, VA Joseph Sirotnak, Ph.D., Ecology Big Bend National Park Dean Urban, Ph.D. Big Bend, Texas Duke University Durham, NC Loretta Battaglia, Ph.D., Ecology Southern Illinois University Adam M. Lambert, Ph.D. Carbondale, IL Santa Barbara, CA Dawn Lawson, Ph.D., Ecology Elizabeth L. Middleton, Ph.D. San Diego, California Missouri Department of Conservation Clinton, MO Matthew Olson, Ph.D., Forest Resources West Plains, MO Kenneth Langeland, Ph.D. Professor, University of Florida IFAS, F. Bryan Pickett, Ph.D., Genetics Agronomy Department and Center for Aquatic Chicago, IL and Invasive Plants Gainesville, FL Lizbeth Seebacher, Ph.D., Invasive Species Biology Catherine A. McGlynn, Ph.D. Washington State Department of Ecology Northeast Illinois Invasive Plant Partnership Lacey, WA Chicago, IL Lowell Pritchard Jr., Ph.D., Natural Resource Donald C. Jackson, Ph.D., Fisheries Economics Mississippi State University Creation Care Inc. Mississippi State, MS Decatur, GA Douglas B. Inkley, Ph.D. Jo Anna Hebberger, Ph.D., Plant Ecology National Wildlife Federation Des Moines, IA Reston, VA Alton Kinlaw, Ph.D., R.Ph. Doria R Gordon, Ph.D. Indiana University Health The Nature Conservancy Indianapolis, IN Gainesville, FL Thomas Eubank, Ph.D., Weed Science Emma Hampton, Ph.D., Zoology Mississippi State University University of Texas at Austin Stoneville, MS Austin, TX William Faber, Ph.D., Wildlife Ecology Vicky Meretsky, Ph.D. Central Lakes College Indiana University Brainerd, MN Bloomington, IN Daniel C. Abel, Ph.D. Angie Shelton, Ph.D. Coastal Carolina University Indiana University Conway, SC Bloomington, IN Sarah Ward, Ph.D. Chris Habeck, Ph.D. Colorado State University Kutztown University Fort Collins, CO Kutztown, PA Leonard Bull, Ph.D. Reuben Keller, Ph.D. Cornell University Loyola University, Chicago New Haven, VT Chicago, IL Antonio DiTommaso, Ph.D. Victor Maddox, Ph.D. Cornell University Mississippi Cooperative Weed Management Ithaca, NY Area Mississippi State, MS John J. Jachetta, Ph.D. Dow AgroSciences LLC David R. Shaw, Ph.D. Indianapolis, IN Mississippi State University Miss. State, MS Sam Pearsall, Ph.D. Environmental Defense Fund John D. Byrd, Jr., Ph.D. Raleigh, NC Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS Margaret K. Thayer, Ph.D. Field Museum of Natural History Bruce A. Stein, Ph.D. Chicago, IL National Wildlife Federation Washington, DC Frank Powell, Ph.D. Furman University James T. Green, Jr., Ph.D. Seneca, SC North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC Daniel R. Ludwig, Ph.D. Illinois Department of Natural Resources Kirk Howatt, Ph.D. Bartlett, IL North Dakota State University Fargo, ND Heather L Reynolds, Ph.D. Indiana University Daniel A. Ball, Ph.D. Bloomington, IN Oregon State University Pendleton, OR Carol Mallory-Smith, Ph.D. Betsy Von Holle, Ph.D. Oregon State University University of Central Florida Corvallis, OR Orlando, FL Thomas Wassmer, Ph.D. Vicki Jackson, Ph.D. Siena Heights University University of Central Missouri Adrian, MI Warrensburg, MO William R. Eddleman, Ph.D. Sarah Bois, Ph.D. Southeast Missouri State University University of Connecticut Cape Girardeau, MO Storrs, CT Christopher E. Comer, Ph.D. Mark VanGessel, Ph.D. Stephen F. Austin State University University of Delaware Nacogdoches, TX Georgetown, DE Li Kui, Ph.D. William A Overholt, Ph.D. SUNY-ESF University of Florida Syracuse, NY Fort Pierce, FL Brian D. Carver, Ph.D. Lyn Gettys, Ph.D. Tennessee Technological University University of Florida Cookeville, TN Davie, FL James R. Manhart, Ph.D. Jason Evans, Ph.D. Texas A&M University University of Georgia College Station, TX Athens, GA Scott Senseman, Ph.D. Donn Shilling, Ph.D. Texas A&M University University of Georgia College Station, TX Athens, GA Peter Kareiva, Ph.D. Lauren Quinn, Ph.D. The Nature Conservancy University of Illinois Seattle, WA Urbana, IL Kelly Lyons, Ph.D. Peter Alpert, Ph.D. Trinity University University of Massachusetts, Amherst San Antonio, TX Amherst, MA Jodie S Holt, Ph.D. Catherine Badgley, Ph.D. University of California University of Michigan Riverside, CA Ann Arbor, MI L. Jack Lyon, Ph.D. John Fike, Ph.D. University of Michigan Virginia Tech Missoula, MT Blacksburg, VA Larry G. Visser, Ph.D. Paul E. Bartelt, Ph.D. University of Michigan Waldorf College Ann Arbor, MI Forest City, IA Johannes Foufopoulos, Ph.D. M. Jahi Chappell, Ph.D. University of Michigan Washington State University, Vancouver Ann Arbor, MI Vancouver, WA Michael R. Moore, Ph.D. Kashka Kubzdela, Ph.D. University of Michigan Oakton, VA Ann Arbor, MI Charles P. Nicholson, Ph.D. Ivette Perfecto, Ph.D. Norris, TN University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI Jeff Levengood, Ph.D. Champaign, IL William S. Currie, Ph.D. University of Michigan Jean O'Neil, Ph.D. Ann Arbor, MI W. Hatfield, MA Daniel Tufford, Ph.D. Ron Carroll, Ph.D. University of South Carolina Athens, GA Columbia, SC Ruth Douglas, Ph.D.
Recommended publications
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE March 29, 2001
    March 29, 2001 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE 4995 Hoeffel, Peter Hoekstra, Tim Holden, Rush Thomas G. Tancredo, John S. Tanner, Ellen transmitting a copy of the annual report in D. Holt, Michael M. Honda, Darlene Hooley, O. Tauscher, W. J. (Billy) Tauzin, Charles H. compliance with the Government in the Sun- Stephen Horn, John N. Hostettler, Amo Taylor, Gene Taylor, Lee Terry, William M. shine Act during the calendar year 2000, pur- Houghton, Steny H. Hoyer, Kenny C. Thomas, Bennie G. Thompson, Mike Thomp- suant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(j); to the Committee Hulshof, Duncan Hunter, Asa Hutchinson, son, Mac Thornberry, John R. Thune, Karen on Government Reform. Henry J. Hyde, Jay Inslee, Johnny Isakson, L. Thurman, Todd Tiahrt, Patrick J. Tiberi, f Steve Israel, Darrell E. Issa, Ernest J. John F. Tierney, Patrick J. Toomey, James Istook, Jr., Jesse L. Jackson, Jr., Sheila A. Traficant, Jr., Jim Turner, Mark Udall, PUBLIC BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS Jackson-Lee, William J. Jefferson, William Robert A. Underwood, Fred Upton, Nydia M. Under clause 2 of rule XII, public ´ L. Jenkins, Christopher John, Eddie Bernice Velazquez, Peter J. Visclosky, David Vitter, bills and resolutions of the following Johnson, Nancy L. Johnson, Sam Johnson, Greg Walden, James T. Walsh, Zach Wamp, Timothy V. Johnson, Stephanie Tubbs Maxine Waters, Wes Watkins, Melvin L. titles were introduced and severally re- Jones, Walter B. Jones, Paul E. Kanjorski, Watt, J.C. Watts, Jr., Henry A. Waxman, An- ferred, as follows: Marcy Kaptur, Ric Keller, Sue W. Kelly, thony D. Weiner, Curt Weldon, Dave Weldon, By Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma (for him- Mark R.
    [Show full text]
  • PB Washington Update - January 29, 2013 - Interim Update
    PB Washington Update - January 29, 2013 - Interim Update This is a follow-up to the earlier email transmitting the US DOT press release announcing that after months of speculation, US DOT Secretary Ray LaHood will be stepping down. LaHood has indicated he will serve until his replacement is nominated and confirmed, so he could remain in office for several months. There are currently a number of Cabinet vacancies – State (soon to be filled by Senator John Kerry), Defense (former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel has been nominated), Treasury, Interior, Commerce (currently has an Acting Secretary) and Labor, as well as EPA Administrator. It is unclear if the Administration will announce nominees for these positions individually over time or in one or more groups. A number of people rumored to be under consideration for the US DOT spot may also be potential candidates for other agency leaders. It may be a process of plugging in various names for various vacancies until an acceptable across-the-board team develops. Given the outcry over the lack of diversity in the President’s nominations for the national security posts, it is presumed that diversity will be a key criteria when naming additional nominees. As we know from past presidential nomination efforts, being a subject expert is not always a key criteria. Listed below are a variety of names that have been rumored to be potential replacements for Secretary LaHood. They are grouped by background, not by likelihood of being nominated – some seem very unlikely. However, the nominee could just as easily be someone not currently on the radar screen as was the case when Ray LaHood was nominated at the start of the Obama Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover: a New Spirit
    hange was in the air on “It was fabulous,” said Joe January 20, 2009. Flanders, Directing Business Shortly after the stroke Representative of IAM District Lodge of noon – while under 4, who traveled from Brunswick, the watchful gaze of Maine to Washington, DC, with his Cmillions on the National Mall and family and several other IAM mem- billions more in front of television bers to witness the historic event. and computer screens here and “For me and all the people around across the globe – the United States us, it felt like anything is possible. It’s of America officially inaugurated its never been that way. Never have I 44th chief executive: President seen a president come into office Barack Obama. with the amount of excitement he’s Many in attendance – buried in generated.” several layers of clothing while “My fellow citizens,” said braving the bone-chilling cold and Obama in his first address as U.S. engulfed in a sea of people – said it President. “I stand here today hum- was like nothing they’ve ever expe- bled by the task before us, grateful rienced before. for the trust you have bestowed, AP/ World Wide Photo Wide AP/ World 10 IAM JOURNAL Winter 2009 ”The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.” President Barack Obama AP/ World Wide Photo Wide AP/ World Winter 2009 IAM JOURNAL 11 mindful of the sacrifices African-American president.
    [Show full text]
  • Building and Restoring Civic Capacity: (2011-2016)
    BUILDING AND RESTORING CIVIC CAPACITY: THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S FEDERAL-LOCAL PARTNERSHIP WITH DETROIT (2011-2016) December 3, 2016 The Executive Office of the President Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 I. The Evolution of the Detroit Federal Working Group: From Crisis Response to Building Capacity ..... 8 II. Neighborhood Stabilization ................................................................................................................ 11 III. Resilience & Sustainability .................................................................................................................. 17 IV. Workforce Development & Training ................................................................................................... 21 V. Transportation .................................................................................................................................... 25 VI. Economic Development ...................................................................................................................... 29 VII. International Affairs ............................................................................................................................ 33 VIII. Policing & Public Safety ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks on Signing the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: a Legacy for Users in Montgomery, Illin
    Administration of George W. Bush, 2005 / Aug. 10 1271 that as interest rates rise now, that could slow machinery here. I want to thank you for your the momentum in the U.S. economy? hard work. I want to thank you for your— The President. I think—first of all, as you for putting out a great product. know, that the Federal Reserve is completely And I’m here to sign the highway bill be- independent from the White House. They cause I believe by signing this bill, when it’s make decisions independent of politics, and fully implemented, there’s going to be more that’s important. Ben used to serve on the demand for the machines you make here. Federal Reserve Board, so he’s—he has had And because there’s more demand for the some insight into the workings of the Federal machines you make here, there’s going to be Reserve. But our job is to deal with fiscal more jobs created around places like this fa- policy, and the Federal Reserve deals with cility. So thanks for letting us come. monetary policy. I was telling some of the fellows I met And as I’ve said all along, I trust the judg- behind the stage that there’s a Cat working ment of Chairman Alan Greenspan. He is— on the ranch right now. [Laughter] And I’m he makes decisions based upon facts, not not driving it. [Laughter] based upon politics. And I think it’s impor- I’m honored to be here with Denny tant for the American people to understand Hastert.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Friday Report
    ITEM IV C SIMON AND COMPANY INCORPORATED Washington Friday Report Volume XV, Issue 11 March 15, 2013 awarding of grants will depend ultimately on the FY13 I N S I D E T H I S W EEK Continuing Resolution, but COPS is likely to go forward with the solicitation in April under any circumstances. Remember 1 FY13 CR, COPS, FY14 House and Senate Budgets that COPS Hiring Grants are for a maximum of $125,000 over a 3-year period with a 25% local match and with the grant 2 VAWA, Gun Bills, Brownfields, WRDA, MAP-21 recipient obligated to pay for the fourth year at 100%. Like last year, the COPS office will be seeking applications which give 2 Transit Ridership Surge, Brookings on Rail preference to hiring veterans. This year, there is also a strong possibility that the COPS office will favor applications which give preference to School Resource Officer activities and other Talk about regular order! This week, Washington was in school safety initiatives in light of the Newtown massacre. overdrive – the House and Senate dealing with FY13 and FY14 More on this as the COPS FY13 solicitation proceeds. budgets, the President in search of the Bipartisan Grand Bargain, and lots more. Here’s the highlights for your review. FY14 House and Senate Budget Resolutions Senate FY13 Continuing Resolution The House and Senate are both at work marking up their respective FY14 budget resolutions, but vast differences Both the House and the Senate have released their respective remain between the two top-line spending measures. House FY13 Continuing Resolutions (CRs) to fund the federal Budget Chairman Paul Ryan released his committee’s plan, th government past March 27 to avoid a shutdown.
    [Show full text]
  • DOT Chief Ray Lahood Leaves Agency at Crossroads
    Portfolio Media. Inc. | 860 Broadway, 6th Floor | New York, NY 10003 | www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 | Fax: +1 646 783 7161 | [email protected] DOT Chief Ray LaHood Leaves Agency At Crossroads By Liz Hoffman Law360, New York (February 04, 2013, 10:34 PM ET) -- U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood is stepping down, and experts say his replacement will need to be equal parts infrastructure wonk and congressional backslapper to steer the agency through a tough debate about how to pay for America's roads, rails and ports. Over his four-year tenure, LaHood led the White House’s efforts to expand high-speed rail lines and bike lanes, cracked down on distracted driving and oversaw an increase in low-cost loans to big capital projects. But experts say he failed to advance a serious discussion over fixing the highway trust fund and oversaw a congressional reauthorization process that mostly kicked the can down an increasingly potholed road. By his own admission, LaHood, a career congressman, wasn't much of a infrastructure buff. He told The New York Times in 2009: “I don’t think they picked me because they thought I’d be that great a transportation person.” Instead, his position as a Republican with tight ties to then-White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel won him the job. He became a key liaison between the president and congressional Republicans, helping to smooth over a ban on earmarks — a key funding mechanism for local infrastructure projects — in the House. “[LaHood] came at the job from a legislative background, and that was certainly an asset,” said Marcus Lemon, counsel at McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP and a former chief counsel to the Federal Highway Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Government Day Moves to Springfield Photo by Ted Schurter Ted Photoby U.S
    Review PreviewThe newsletter of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute & at Southern Illinois University Carbondale Youth Government Day Moves To Springfield Photo by Ted Schurter Ted Photo by U.S. Congressman Ray LaHood (R-Peoria) addresses high school students in the chamber of the Illinois House of Representatives during the institute’s sixth Youth Government Day and the first to be held in Springfield. ncreased attendance and a great deal of excitement LaHood, Edgar Jump Start Youth for future events resulted from the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute’s decision to move its annual Youth Government Day Endowment Government Day to Springfield, the seat of state gov- Two prominent long-time public officials made major con- ernment in Illinois and home to one of our nation’s greatest tributions to the institute’s Youth Government Day endow- Ipublic servants, Abraham Lincoln. ment. “Unfortunately, young people interested in making a U.S. Congressman Ray LaHood and former Illinois Gov- positive difference in society don’t always get the encour- ernor Jim Edgar each made donations of $25,000 to the newly agement they need. We are delighted to give students this established endowment to assure the annual event aimed at great opportunity to hear from accomplished leaders who motivating young people to enter the public service profession see Youth, Page 11 continues for years to come with a dedicated source of revenue. The gifts were acknowledged during a November 2005 insti- tute fundraiser in Springfield. ISSUE 13 / SPRING 2006 “I’m so proud to be able to support these important programs which do so much to help ensure we will have good public ser- Message from Mike Lawrence........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Inaugural Nominee Announcements: Trump-Clinton
    PRE-INAUGURAL NOMINEE ANNOUNCEMENTS: TRUMP-CLINTON Melanie Geller Drew Flanagan ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT The last four presidents announced 115 nominees for Senate-confirmed positions prior to taking office. Among these, 71, including 49 out of 56 Cabinet nominees, received pre-inauguration hearings.1 Only eight nominations by four presidents were withdrawn. This document contains tables listing each announcement sorted by president, along with key dates and speed of confirmation for each nominee. Secretaries of the 15 Cabinet departments are denoted in boldface. Preceding each table is a supplementary narrative discussing events and influences that affected each transition team and their pre- inaugural nominations. Summary • The Trump transition team announced 29 nominees during the transition period from election to inauguration, and the Senate confirmed 26. Fifteen nominees received pre-inaugural hearings. For a variety of reasons, including vetting, paperwork, controversy and a high number of procedural votes, the Trump nominees took much longer than the nominees of other presidents. The Senate confirmed Trump’s Cabinet secretaries in 23.9 days, on average. • The Obama transition team announced 42 nominees, including Secretary of Defense Gates, who stayed on from the George W. Bush administration. Twenty-five received pre-inaugural hearings. Obama’s Cabinet secretaries were confirmed in an average of 4.9 days. • Even with a truncated transition, the George W. Bush transition team announced 20 nominees during the transition, including Director of the CIA George Tenet, who remained in his position. Fourteen received pre-inaugural hearings. The Senate confirmed all except for one in about 3 days and confirmed Cabinet secretaries in 1.6 days, on average.
    [Show full text]
  • [Table 7-6] CABINET NOMINATIONS, Since 1789 President/ Position
    [Table 7-6] CABINET NOMINATIONS, Since 1789 President/ Position Date of Confirmation Nominee Nomination 1 or Other Action 2 WASHINGTON_________________________________________________________________________ Edmund Randolph Attorney General Sept. 25, 1789 Sept. 26, 1789 William Bradford Attorney General Jan. 24, 1794 Jan. 27, 1794 Charles Lee Attorney General Dec. 9, 1795 Dec. 10, 1795 Samuel Osgood Postmaster General Sept. 25, 1789 Sept. 26, 1789 Timothy Pickering Postmaster General Nov. 1, 1789 Nov. 7, 1789 Joseph Habersham Postmaster General Feb. 24, 1795 Feb. 25, 1795 Thomas Jefferson State Sept. 25, 1789 Sept. 26, 1789 Edmund Randolph State Jan. 1, 1794 Jan. 2, 1794 Timothy Pickering State Dec. 9, 1795 Dec. 10, 1795 Alexander Hamilton Treasury Sept. 11, 1789 Sept. 11, 1789 Oliver Wolcott, Jr. Treasury Feb. 2, 1795 Feb. 3, 1795 Henry Knox War Sept. 11, 1789 Sept. 12, 1789 Timothy Pickering War Jan. 2, 1795 Jan. 2, 1795 James McHenry War Jan. 26, 1796 Jan. 27, 1796 Total Cabinet nominations = 14 ADAMS________________________________________________________________________________ Charles Lee Attorney General continued * [Theophilus Parsons Attorney General Feb. 18, 1801 Feb. 20, 1801 D] Benjamin Stoddert Navy May 18, 1798 May 21, 1798 Joseph Habersham Postmaster General continued * Timothy Pickering State continued * John Marshall State May 12, 1800 May 13, 1800 Oliver Wolcott, Jr. Treasury continued * Samuel Dexter Treasury Dec. 30, 1800 Dec. 31, 1800 James McHenry War continued * Samuel Dexter War May 12, 1800 May 13, 1800 [Lucius Stockton War Jan. 15, 1801 Jan. 29, 1801 W] Roger Griswold War Jan. 29, 1801 Feb. 3, 1801 25-5 Total Cabinet nominations =7 JEFFERSON____________________________________________________________________________ Levi Lincoln Attorney General Mar. 5, 1801 Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • OPEN SEATS Announced They Will Not Be Running for Reelection, Compared with Only Four House Democrats
    ELECTION ’O8 The biggest challenge facing congressional Republicans this election cycle is dealing with the exodus of their colleagues from Capitol Hill — 17 House Republicans (and four GOP senators) have OPEN SEATS announced they will not be running for reelection, compared with only four House Democrats. Politico Rating: Toss-Up Arizona’s 1st District New Mexico’s 1st District Ohio’s 15th District Ohio’s 16th District New Jersey’s 7th District Rick Renzi (R) Heather Wilson (R) Deborah Pryce (R) Ralph Regula (R) Mike Ferguson (R) Running for Senate Seat Major city in district: Major city in district: Major city in district: Major city in district: Flagstaff Major city in district: Columbus Canton Hunterdon and Somer- Albuquerque set Counties Republican contend- Republican contender: Republican contend- ers: Bill Konopnicki, Republican contender: 2006 2006 2006 Steve Stivers 2006 ers: Matt Miller, Kirk 2006 Republican contenders: Sydney Hay Darren White Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Schuring Percentage None declared Democratic contend- Democratic contenders: Democratic contender: 52% ers: Ann Kirkpatrick, 50% Martin Heinrich, Mi- 50% Mary Jo Kilroy 58% Democratic contender: 49% Democratic contender: Mary Kim Titla chelle Lujan Grisham John Boccieri Linda Stender 2004 Presidential 2004 Presidential 2004 Presidential 2004 Presidential 2004 Presidential Bush 54% Bush 48% Bush 50% Bush 54% Bush 53% Kerry 46% Kerry 51% Kerry 50% Kerry 46% Kerry 47% Politico Rating: Likely Republican Illinois’ 18th District Colorado’s 6th District
    [Show full text]
  • UNIT 4: the EXECUTIVE BRANCH Presidential Powers
    UNIT 4: THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH p. 24A-B Presidential Powers The Constitution says surprisingly little about presidential powers 1. Military Powers: Commander and Chief of the Armed Forces 2. Executive Powers: appoints heads of executive departments (Especially his cabinet and other top officials) 3. Foreign Policy Powers: the president makes treaties, meets with heads of state, hosts foreign officials, and appoint ambassadors to represent the U.S. in foreign nations 1 Presidential Powers 4. Judicial powers: appoints federal court judges and pardons people convicted of federal crimes 5. Legislative Powers: Most important job as the president is to ensure that the laws are “faithfully executed” Delivers annual State of the Union message to Congress Proposes legislation Presidential Terms Originally, the Constitution did not specify term limits, but Washington set a precedent of two terms After FDR broke that tradition and was elected for four terms, that changed nd 22 Amendment (1951)- two terms/10 years 2 It’s Good to be Chief! $400,000 a year plus $100,000 for expenses Air Force One, planes, helicopters, and limou sines Free medical, dental and health care Live in the White House Have a staff to cook, clean, and do whatever they need or want Lifet ime pension Air Force One Facts There are two planes in this fleet “While on the aircraft, the PresidentPresident and staffstaff have access to a full range of services, including communications systems, secure and non-secure voice, fax and data communications, along with access to photocopying, printing, and word processing.” 85 telephones, 19 televisions, in-flight refueling, freezer holds about 2,000 meals, ready to operate medical facility and an on- board doctor 3 4 Qualifications 1.
    [Show full text]