DOCSLIB.ORG

Southeastern Europe: Dimensions, Challenges, Perspectives”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Scientific-Technical Union of Mechanical Engineering "Industry-4.0" BULGARIAN HUB FOR UNITED BALKANS BULLETIN “SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE: DIMENSIONS, CHALLENGES, PERSPECTIVES” ISSN 2683-0574 1 / 2020, Sofia, Bulgaria Partners: Center for International and Development Studies (Republic of North Macedonia) Civil Development Organization (Republic of Kosovo) EUROBALKAN, Association for Research and Development (Republic of Serbia) Group for Legal and Political Studies (Republic of Kosovo) Institute for Development and International Relations (Republic of Croatia) Pilot4Dev (Kingdom of Belgium) The Balkan Forum (Republic of Kosovo) Youth Alliance – Krusevo (Republic of North Macedonia) Scientific Reviewers: Prof. Plamen Pantev, PhD (Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski", ISIS, BHUB) Prof. Hristo Bondzolov, PhD (Rector of "St. Cyril and St. Methodious" University of Veliko Turnovo) Prof. Sead Turcalo, PhD (University of Sarajevo) Prof. Slavenko Grgurevic, PhD (EUROBALKAN) Prof. Jana Kukeska, PhD (University of Tourism and Management) Prof. Dr. Sc. Kiril Topalov (Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski") Prof. Dr. Sc. Georgi Bahchevanov (New Bulgarian University) Prof. Ilin Savov, PhD (Higher School of Security and Economics) Assoc. Prof. Blagoj Conev, PhD (Center for International and Development Studies) Dr. Sandro Knezovic (Institute for Development and International Relations) Dr. Petyo Valkov (Counsellor at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Bulgaria, BHUB) Compilation and editing of the bulletin: Asst. Prof. Dr. Michael Dimitrov (Special Coordinator of Bulgarian Hub for United Balkans) Petya Vladimirova (Member of the Management board of Bulgarian Hub for United Balkans) BULGARIAN HUB FOR UNITED BALKANS 33B, “Bratya Buxton” Str., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria Website: https://bhub-ngo.org/ Email: [email protected] Publisher: Scientific Technical Union of Mechanical Engineering "Industry 4.0" Contents Post-Independence Identity, Politics and Society in North Macedonia 3 CONEV Blagoj, Assoc. Prof. PhD Geopolitical implications of Small-Scale LNG: Fiction or Reality? 11 DIMITROV Michael, Asst. Prof. PhD The EU and the Western Balkans: Visions and Horizons 21 GABORIT Pascaline, PhD The Problem of Democratic Transition and Consolidation of SEE Countries 28 GUSHEV Tome, PhD Candidate #Dīvide Et Īmpera 43 ILIEV Svetlin The Contemporary Doctrinal Basis of the Albanian National Question 59 NINOV Marian, Assoc. Prof. PhD The History and Historical Committees in the Context of the Restart of the 74 European Atlantic Perspective of Skopje STANEV Stanislav, PhD The Euro-Atlantic Aspiration of the “Albanian Factor” 85 VALKOV Petyo, PhD POST-INDEPENDENCE IDENTITY, POLITICS AND SOCIETY IN NORTH MACEDONIA Assoc. Prof. Blagoj CONEV, PhD (Image source: https://plusinfo.mk/помирувањето-за-крвавиот-четврток/) Summary: With (North) Macedonia's independence in 19911, there was no alternative for the name of the new state and the nation. Namely, although in Greece at that time the politicians and the policy makers developed a very complex political situation to affirm and prove the Hellenistic identity of ancient Macedonia, nevertheless, the name ―Macedonia‖ was engraved as an indissoluble element of the nation's identity that in 1991 stepped on the path of creation of its own nation-state - Macedonia. In fact, Macedonia from 1991 at that time, does not implied any kind of identity conflict with Hellenistic Macedonia, because in the way of defining of the historical identities, and especially the myths which were defining the nation, the Macedonians themselves chose to determine themselves as Slavs, or nation with South Slavic origins i.e. they did not identified the primordiality of their existence with the ancient Macedon, but with the medieval Slavic tribes that inhabit the Balkans, and later begin to identify with territory of Macedonia. Keywords: identity, nation-state, society, politics, history, memory, myths. 1 The official name of the state from 2019 is Republic of North Macedonia or simply North Macedonia. 3 The impact of the national identity on politics and society in North Macedonia ―Today, the culture is accepted, even emphasized, as a political instrument‖2. Frckoski‘s definition of culture as a political instrument has been normal since the post-Great French Revolution era, because culture, as Frckoski defines, it is: ―The most general definition of culture was: norms and rules, customs, and patterns of behavior common to one particular group of people. Therefore, culture was something that homogenized...‖3. And if Frckoski's definition would be compared to Anthony D. Smith‘s definition in the first chapter of the book National Identity, that nations are ―named community possessing an historic territory, shared myths and memories, a common public culture and common laws and customs‖4, then one come to the conclusion that mass or group culture is one of the pillars of the nation. Namely, if common myths and collective memory, mass culture and customs are the basis of a nation‘s identity, according to ethno-symbolic theory, and identity is a political instrument for determining the nation‘s individuality, then it is most natural for culture to be understood as a political instrument. The young Macedonian nation, its historical development from the Revival Period (late 19th and the beginning of the 20th century) to independence, or the establishment of a nation-state in 1991, has its identity core in the ideological layout of the nation's Slavic past. As a revival period organization, Macedonian Scientific- Literary Society, whose president is one of the ideological fathers of the Macedonian nation, Krste Misirkov, in a Memorandum sent to the Council of St. Petersburg Slavic Benevolent Society, he points out that there is another Slavic nation that wants and needs to form its own state, and that, ―in Macedonia the majority of the entire population are Slavs‖5. Such a determination that the Slavic self-consciousness is embedded in the collective memory of the Macedonian population, i.e. the Macedonian nation connects with the other Slavic nations, signifies that the culture which is a mass of that Macedonian population is Slavic and closely related to the other South Slavic cultures. The very problem of identification or cultural determination in Macedonia started when political elites ―... began to develop activities and invest great energy in proving the connection of today's Macedonians with the ancient tradition of Philip II and Alexander the Great ...‖6. 2 Фрчкоски, Љ.Д. (2012). Преговарање во конфликти на идентитети. Скопје: Магор. 3 Ibid, pp. 57 4 Smith, A. (1991). National Identity. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 5 Ристовски, Б. (1978). Димитрија Чуповски (1878-1940) и Македонското научно-литературно другарство. Скопје: Култура. pp. 180-189 6 Габер, В. (2009). Името Македонија. Историја, право, политика. Скопје: Југореклам. pp. 131 4 This was an attempt to link the modern Macedonian nation directly with the historical state form named as Macedon(ia), to secure the prenatality of the present- day Macedonian nation and its primordial existence. Namely, every connection of the nation with its past indicates a desire to prove the nation‘s eternity, but also its permanence, i.e. its existence since the time of history. But what is interesting is that the link to the historical past, that is, the change in the collective memory of the population in terms of understanding the ―eternity‖ of the nation, is to be shown as the fruit of mutatis mutandis in the historical cycle of some of the ancient nations in the region. Thus, as Steven Grosby determines, ethnic groups and nationalities justify their existence through traditional beliefs in the biological relevance of the group and its association with the territory it inhabits7. The biggest problem that arises with this perennial interpretation of the nation is its connection to the ancient past in order to engrave this past as an inalienable part of the collective memory of the group. This inalienable part of the nation‘s identity then becomes a threat to the neighboring nation (in this case the Greek) which already exists with its perennial relations to the cultural heritage of the antiquity, and has defined that cultural heritage as one of the basic elements of its cultural distinctiveness, i.e. as part of its own national identity. This situation leads into a process of conflict between identities and represented one of the biggest political problems in Macedonia before 2019 and in North Macedonia after 2019, as this conflict enables a slow democratic development of the state and the development of the specific and extreme ―Balkan‖ kind of nationalism in Macedonian society, but also in Greece. The inability of political elites to overcome the nation‘s identity conflict with neighboring nations, however, leads to conflict within a multi-ethnic Macedonian society itself, i.e. the Macedonian nation is not formed as a result of the homogenization of a group and its culture, but rather created as a mix of multiple culturally distinct identities. Victor Gaber says for the London Economist (22.11.2007) that: ―They share the unmistakable but absurd assumption that the achievements of an entity known as Macedonia in ancient history should be of decisive importance in modern ethnography or political geography - the fact that an ancient kingdom called Macedonia, only one entity could be entitled to that name. The region is still waiting for a statesman to reject that assumption‖8. Determining
Recommended publications
  • The Diary of Bogdan Filov Bogdan Dimitrov Filov

    The Diary of Bogdan Filov Bogdan Dimitrov Filov

    DOCUMENTS FREDERICK B. CHARY, translator and editor (Gary, Ind., U.S.A.) The Diary of Bogdan Filov Bogdan Dimitrov Filov (1883-1945) was prime minister of Bulgaria from 1940 to 1943 and a member of the regency couiicil from September, 1943 to September 9, 1944. One of the most important political leaders of the Kingdom of Bulgaria during the critical years of World War II, he wrote a diary of day-to-day events of that time which has great value for the historian. In it are revealed both the stresses of Balkan politics and the views of Axis leaders and their allies on the war. Before entering upon his political career, Filov was an art historian and an archaeologist. He was at one time a rector of Sofia University and president of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. His scholarly works were so numerous and impressive that even today they form a major contribution to the study of Bulgarian antiquities and medieval art. Filov first entered the Bulgarian government in November, 1938, as minister of education. Although he was a Germanophile (he had attended German universities and belonged to several German scholarly societies), his minor post and academic background kept him from the center of political controversy in 1939. At that time a power struggle between Georgi K'oseivanov, the prime minister, and Ivan Bagrianov, the minister of agriculture in the 1938-1939 cabinet, occupied Bulgarian politics. King Boris III had hand-picked K'oseivanov for the premiership in 1935, after the struggles following the Military League's coup d'etat of the previous year had brought the state under the domination of the throne.
  • Will Bulgaria Become Monarchy Again?

    Will Bulgaria Become Monarchy Again?

    Southeast European Politics Vol. IV, No. 2-3 November 2003 pp. 157-174 Will Bulgaria Become Monarchy Again? ROSSEN VASSILEV The Ohio State University ABSTRACT This article deals with the much debated question of whether post-Communist Bulgaria should restore the monarchy abolished by the 1946 referendum. The prospects for bringing back the monarchy are believed to be negligible, given the existing constitutional hurdles and the population’s pro-republican sentiments. But ex-King Simeon’s triumph in the June 2001 parliamentary election has dramatically changed his standing at home. Any restoration of the monarchy will depend on the perceived success of his coalition government, especially in rebuilding the ailing national economy. It is questionable whether Simeon II will be able to live up to the overoptimistic expectations of Bulgarians who believe that like a Messiah he will save their country from the economic, social, political and institutional turmoil into which it has descended. But with a population distrustful of the politically bankrupt old parties and politicians and despondent enough to grasp at straws, a revival of the monarchy cannot be ruled out. Introduction Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan consider the issue of constitutions and constitutional formulas to be a significant, if neglected, aspect of democratic transitions (Linz and Stepan 1996: 81-83). They offer a classification of six different possible constitution-making environments, ranging from those that present the most confining conditions for democratization to those
  • When Fear Is Substituted for Reason: European and Western Government Policies Regarding National Security 1789-1919

    When Fear Is Substituted for Reason: European and Western Government Policies Regarding National Security 1789-1919

    WHEN FEAR IS SUBSTITUTED FOR REASON: EUROPEAN AND WESTERN GOVERNMENT POLICIES REGARDING NATIONAL SECURITY 1789-1919 Norma Lisa Flores A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2012 Committee: Dr. Beth Griech-Polelle, Advisor Dr. Mark Simon Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Michael Brooks Dr. Geoff Howes Dr. Michael Jakobson © 2012 Norma Lisa Flores All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Beth Griech-Polelle, Advisor Although the twentieth century is perceived as the era of international wars and revolutions, the basis of these proceedings are actually rooted in the events of the nineteenth century. When anything that challenged the authority of the state – concepts based on enlightenment, immigration, or socialism – were deemed to be a threat to the status quo and immediately eliminated by way of legal restrictions. Once the façade of the Old World was completely severed following the Great War, nations in Europe and throughout the West started to revive various nineteenth century laws in an attempt to suppress the outbreak of radicalism that preceded the 1919 revolutions. What this dissertation offers is an extended understanding of how nineteenth century government policies toward radicalism fostered an environment of increased national security during Germany’s 1919 Spartacist Uprising and the 1919/1920 Palmer Raids in the United States. Using the French Revolution as a starting point, this study allows the reader the opportunity to put events like the 1848 revolutions, the rise of the First and Second Internationals, political fallouts, nineteenth century imperialism, nativism, Social Darwinism, and movements for self-government into a broader historical context.
  • Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006

    Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006

    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: BULGARIA October 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Bulgaria (Republika Bŭlgariya). Short Form: Bulgaria. Term for Citizens(s): Bulgarian(s). Capital: Sofia. Click to Enlarge Image Other Major Cities (in order of population): Plovdiv, Varna, Burgas, Ruse, Stara Zagora, Pleven, and Sliven. Independence: Bulgaria recognizes its independence day as September 22, 1908, when the Kingdom of Bulgaria declared its independence from the Ottoman Empire. Public Holidays: Bulgaria celebrates the following national holidays: New Year’s (January 1); National Day (March 3); Orthodox Easter (variable date in April or early May); Labor Day (May 1); St. George’s Day or Army Day (May 6); Education Day (May 24); Unification Day (September 6); Independence Day (September 22); Leaders of the Bulgarian Revival Day (November 1); and Christmas (December 24–26). Flag: The flag of Bulgaria has three equal horizontal stripes of white (top), green, and red. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early Settlement and Empire: According to archaeologists, present-day Bulgaria first attracted human settlement as early as the Neolithic Age, about 5000 B.C. The first known civilization in the region was that of the Thracians, whose culture reached a peak in the sixth century B.C. Because of disunity, in the ensuing centuries Thracian territory was occupied successively by the Greeks, Persians, Macedonians, and Romans. A Thracian kingdom still existed under the Roman Empire until the first century A.D., when Thrace was incorporated into the empire, and Serditsa was established as a trading center on the site of the modern Bulgarian capital, Sofia.
  • AFFAIRE RELATIVE a L'incident AÉRIEN DU 27 JUILLET 1955 (ISRAËL C

    AFFAIRE RELATIVE a L'incident AÉRIEN DU 27 JUILLET 1955 (ISRAËL C

    COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE RECUEIL DES ARRETS, AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES AFFAIRE RELATIVE A L'INCIDENT AÉRIEN DU 27 JUILLET 1955 (ISRAËL c. BULGARIE) EXCEPTIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES ARR~TDU 26 MAI 1959 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF JULY 27th, 1955 (ISRAEL v. BULGARIA) PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS JUDGMENT OF MAY 26th, 1959 Le présent arrêt doit être cité comme suit: (( Agaire relative à l'incident aérien du 27 juillet I955 (Israël c. Bulgarie), Exceptions préliminaires, Arrêt dzt 26 mai 19-59 : C. I. J. Recueil 1959, p. 127. 1) This Judgment should be cited as follows: "Case concerning the Aerial Incident of Jzdy 27th, 1955 (Israel v. Bulgaria) , P~eliminaryObjections, Jzsdgnzent of May 26th, I959: I.C. J. Reports I959, p. 127." No de vente: Sales number 206 / INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE 1959 May 26th General List : No. 35 YEAR 1959 May 26th, 1959 CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF (ISRAEL v. BULGARIA) PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS Com~ulsoryjurisdiction of International Court of Justice.-Declara- tions accepting compulsory jurisdiction of Permanent Court of Inter- national Justice.-Article 36, paragraph 5, of Statute of Court.- Determination of States to which Article 36, paragraph 5, app1ies.- Conditions required for application of Article 36, paragraph 5.-Lapse of a declaration following dissolution of Permanent Court. JUDGMENT Present : President KLAESTAD; Vice-President ZAFRULLAKHAN ; Judges BASDEVANT,HACKWORTH, WINIARSKI, BADAWI, ARMAND-UGON,KO JEVNIKOV, Sir Hersch LAUTERPACHT, MORENOQUINTANA, CORDOVA, WELLINGTON KOO, SPIRO- POULOS,Sir Percy SPENDER;Judges ad hoc GOITEINand ZOUREK;Deputy-Registrar GARNIER-COIGNET. In the case conceming the Aerial Incident of July 27th, 1955, between the State of Israel, represented by Mr.
  • Introduction When the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes – from 1929 Kingdom of Yugoslavia – Was Formed in 1918, One of I

    Introduction When the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes – from 1929 Kingdom of Yugoslavia – Was Formed in 1918, One of I

    Introduction When the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes – from 1929 Kingdom of Yugoslavia – was formed in 1918, one of its most important tasks was to forge a common collective identity. Intellectual elites in the young state with great optimism agreed that education would play a crucial role in this process. It should come as no surprise, then, that a relatively rich tradition of scholarly research into the representation of collective identities in Yugoslav education has originated, precisely to account for the failure of the Yugoslav project in the long term. Recently, a growing body of scholarly research has established textbooks as one of the more rewarding sources for studying collective identity in education, focusing on ‘what knowledge is included and rejected in ... textbooks, and how the transmission of this selected knowledge often attempts to shape a particular form of national memory, national identity and national consciousness’.1 For the Yugoslav case this emerging research field so far has primarily examined textbooks which were used in the period directly preceding, during and following the disintegration of Yugoslavia.2 However, as the present article hopes to illustrate, textbook analysis can also provide the historian with interesting new elements for the study of collective identities in Yugoslavia’s more distant past. With its focus on national identity in Serbian, Croatian and Slovenian textbooks before the First World War, and later also in interwar Yugoslavia, the work of Charles Jelavich still occupies a somewhat
  • Snapshot Report

    Snapshot Report

    SNAPSHOT REPORT OF THE RESEARCH PROJECT: REFUGEELAW.MK “REFUGEES AND MIGRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BALKAN ROUTE – NORTH MACEDONIA’S DISCOURSE DURING 2020 EARLY GENERAL ELECTIONS” Alumni 6 students Mentors 3 Months of historical SNAPSHOT REPORT OF THE RESEARCH REPORT PROJECT: SNAPSHOT 4 overview and context Months research period on daily basis 5 Discourse study areas: 3 public, media and political Focus groups 6 Sources (news, posts, shows, press conferences, events, statements, debates, rallies, articles, columns, 1433 interviews, video records). Comprehensive study to be published in November 2020 1 “REFUGEES AND MIGRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BALKAN ROUTE –NORTH MACEDONIA’S DISCOURSE DURING 2020 EARLY GENERAL ELECTIONS” DISCOURSE DURING 2020 EARLY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BALKAN MACEDONIA’S ROUTE –NORTH “REFUGEES AND MIGRATION SNAPSHOT REPORT of the research project: “Refugees and Migration in the context of the Balkan Route –North Macedonia’s discourse during 2020 early general elections” BACKGROUND The project aimed at identifying and analyzing the public, political and media discourse in North Macedonia on issues related to refugees and migration flows in the context of the Balkan route prior and in the course of the political campaign for early parliamentary elections in 2020. The EU’s non-decision in October 2019 for North Macedonia and Albania has triggered an enormous amount of discon- tent in the country and the setting convoluted by early spring due to COVID-19 outbreak when elections were postponed. The already grave political situation was additionally triggered by the enhanced refugee and migration flows, spurring the public, political and media discourse with nationalism, xenophobia and hate speech.
  • English Bilten 2019

    English Bilten 2019

    Sponsor of the competition: The mayor of the municipality Of Ohrid General Sponsor: Organizer: OEMUC ”St.Naum Ohridski” – Ohrid Balkan Junior 2019 NEWSLETTER OEMUC” St. Naum Ohridski” NEWSLETTER 7. International competition Ohrid, 2019 Balkan Junior 2019 NEWSLETTER OEMUC” St. Naum Ohridski” REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA Official name Republic of North Macedonia or North Macedonia Capital Skopje Official language Macedonian Government Unitary parliamentary republic Demonym(s) Macedonian History Independence declared from SRFY 8 September 1991 Officialy recognized 8 April 1993 Area 25,713 km2 (148ма) Water (%) 1,9% Currency Macedonian Denar (MKD) Membership in international United Nations1993; European Council; organizations Independence Day 8 September Balkan Junior 2019 NEWSLETTER OEMUC” St. Naum Ohridski” The state's name derives from the Greek Μακεδονία (Makedonía). The name was used for Macedonian Empire, later for the Roman Province, Byzantian theme Macedonia, until today for the region Macedonia and the state Macedonia. The name is believed to have originally meant either highlanders or the tall ones, possibly descriptive of the people. Archaeological findings show that civilization existed on the territory of Macedonia from the period between 9000 BC. and 3500 BC For the first time, the Macedonian Kingdom appears in the 9th century BC, and there is a dilemma about who was the first Macedonian king - Karan (considered to be the mythical ancestor of the Argeades) or Perdiccas I (the first historical king of the Kingdom of Macedonia) . The penetration of the Roman Republic to the east leads to the so-called Macedonian-Roman wars (215 BC - 168 BC) in which the Macedonian Kingdom, led by the Antigonine Dynasty, falls entirely under Roman rule, and the last Macedonian king Perseus was taken as a slave to Rome.
  • LARSON-DISSERTATION-2020.Pdf

    LARSON-DISSERTATION-2020.Pdf

    THE NEW “OLD COUNTRY” THE KINGDOM OF YUGOSLAVIA AND THE CREATION OF A YUGOSLAV DIASPORA 1914-1951 BY ETHAN LARSON DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2020 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Maria Todorova, Chair Professor Peter Fritzsche Professor Diane Koenker Professor Ulf Brunnbauer, University of Regensburg ABSTRACT This dissertation reviews the Kingdom of Yugoslavia’s attempt to instill “Yugoslav” national consciousness in its overseas population of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, as well as resistance to that same project, collectively referred to as a “Yugoslav diaspora.” Diaspora is treated as constructed phenomenon based on a transnational network between individuals and organizations, both emigrant and otherwise. In examining Yugoslav overseas nation-building, this dissertation is interested in the mechanics of diasporic networks—what catalyzes their formation, what are the roles of international organizations, and how are they influenced by the political context in the host country. The life of Louis Adamic, who was a central figure within this emerging network, provides a framework for this monograph, which begins with his arrival in the United States in 1914 and ends with his death in 1951. Each chapter spans roughly five to ten years. Chapter One (1914-1924) deals with the initial encounter between Yugoslav diplomats and emigrants. Chapter Two (1924-1929) covers the beginnings of Yugoslav overseas nation-building. Chapter Three (1929-1934) covers Yugoslavia’s shift into a royal dictatorship and the corresponding effect on its emigration policy.
  • The Republic of Macedonia's 2016 Parliamentary Elections Handbook

    The Republic of Macedonia's 2016 Parliamentary Elections Handbook

    THE REPUBLIC OF Macedonia’s 2016 THE REPUBLIC OF PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS MacedOnia’s HANDBOOK 2016 ParliaMentary SECOND UPDATED EDITION electiOns HandbOOk Konrad Adenauer secOnd uPdated editiOn Stiftung Office in Macedonia Risto Ravanovski 8 1000 Skopje http://www.kas.de/mazedonien/mk www.idscs.org.mk Tel: +389 (2) 3217 075 Fax: +389 (2) 3217 076 POLITICS Е-mail: [email protected] Impressum Title: The Republic of Macedonia’s 2016 Parliamentary Elections THE REPUBLIC OF Handbook Macedonia’s 2016 Publisher: The Konrad Adenauer Stiftung in the Republic of Macedonia PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS Institute for Democracy “Societas Civilis” – Skopje HANDBOOK Author: Hristina Veljanova Hristina Veljanova Coordination: Davor Pasoski Johannes D. Rey Translation: Perica Sardzoski Proofreading: Haven Hightower Design and preparation: Vinsent Grafika The publication can be downloaded for free at: http://www.kas.de/mazedonien/mk http://www.idscs.org.mk Note: The stances exposed in this publication do not necessarily represent the positions of the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung and the Institute for Democracy “Societas Civilis” – Skopje, but are personal views of the author. Contents: Democratic Union for Integration 68 1. Introduction to the 2016 Parliamentary Elections 6 Social Democratic Union of Macedonia 71 Preparations for snap parliamentary elections 12 Recent changes to the electoral legislation 14 Coalition for CHANGES and JUSTICE - THIRD BLOCK (Democratic Union, FRODEM, DEMOS and MORO-RP) 76 Party for Democratic Prosperity 77 2. History of the Parliamentary Elections in Macedonia (1990 - 2014) 18 Coalition “Alliance for the Albanians” 1990 parliamentary elections 19 (DR-DPA, Uniteti, NDP) 78 1994 parliamentary elections 21 Liberal Party 79 1998 parliamentary elections 23 Coalition VMRO for Macedonia 80 2002 parliamentary elections 24 Movement BESA 81 2006 parliamentary elections 26 Levica 82 2008 parliamentary elections 28 6.
  • North Macedonia

    North Macedonia

    BTI 2020 Country Report North Macedonia This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2020. It covers the period from February 1, 2017 to January 31, 2019. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of governance in 137 countries. More on the BTI at https://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2020 Country Report — North Macedonia. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2020. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2020 | North Macedonia 3 Key Indicators Population M 2.1 HDI 0.759 GDP p.c., PPP $ 16359 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 0.0 HDI rank of 189 82 Gini Index 35.6 Life expectancy years 75.6 UN Education Index 0.697 Poverty3 % 9.7 Urban population % 58.0 Gender inequality2 0.145 Aid per capita $ 72.0 Sources (as of December 2019): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2019 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2019. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary North Macedonia has a new government after 11 years of absolute political control by the right- wing conservative party, the Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization – Democratic Party for Macedonian National Unity (VMRO-DPMNE) and its junior coalition partner, the ethnic Albanian Democratic Union for Integration (DUI).
  • Heraldry in Macedonia with Special Regard to the People's/Socialist

    Heraldry in Macedonia with Special Regard to the People's/Socialist

    genealogy Article Heraldry in Macedonia with Special Regard to the People’s/Socialist Republic of Macedonia until 1991 Jovan Jonovski Macedonian Heraldic Society, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia; [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +389-70-252-989 Abstract: Every European region and country has some specific heraldry. In this paper, we will consider heraldry in the People’s/Socialist Republic of Macedonia, understood by the multitude of coats of arms, and armorial knowledge and art. Due to historical, as well as geographical factors, there is only a small number of coats of arms and a developing knowledge of art, which make this paper’s aim feasible. This paper covers the earliest preserved heraldic motifs and coats of arms found in Macedonia, as well as the attributed arms in European culture and armorials of Macedonia, the кing of Macedonia, and Alexander the Great of Macedonia. It also covers the land arms of Macedonia from the so-called Illyrian Heraldry, as well as the state and municipal heraldry of P/SR Macedonia. The paper covers the development of heraldry as both a discipline and science, and the development of heraldic thought in SR Macedonia until its independence in 1991. Keywords: heraldry of Macedonia; coats of arms of Macedonia; socialist heraldry; Macedonian municipal heraldry 1. Introduction Macedonia, as a region, is situated on the south of Balkan Peninsula in Southeast Citation: Jonovski, Jovan. 2021. Europe. The traditional boundaries of the geographical region of Macedonia are the lower Heraldry in Macedonia with Special Néstos (Mesta in Bulgaria) River and the Rhodope Mountains to the east; the Skopska Crna Regard to the People’s/Socialist Gora and Shar mountains, bordering Southern Serbia, in the north; the Korab range and Republic of Macedonia until 1991.