Consociational democracy: what was driving Lebanon's sectarian strife between 2006 and early 2016? Master’s Thesis Photo: alexis84/123rf, http://www.thetower.org/article/do-syria-iraq-and-lebanon-still-exist/ Name: Agne Sileikaite (s1755978) E-mail address:
[email protected] Instructor: Dr. M.S. Spirova Second reader: Dr. F. de Zwart Course: Thesis seminar Date: January 12, 2016 Total word count: 10,801 1 Introduction The current Lebanese political system is based on confessionalism, a form of consociationalism, which refers to power-sharing arrangements between various confessional sects within a state (Salamey, 2009:83). Such power-sharing arrangements are to guarantee political representation of all segmented groups and democratic practises, as well as to prevent internal conflicts and establish political stability in deeply divided societies. However since the end of the Lebanese civil war and the signing of the 1990 Ta’if agreement Lebanon has not established a stable fully- functioning consociational democracy but instead had many sectarian conflicts, made worse by the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah war and intensified by the Syrian crisis in 2011 and Hezbollah’s official involvement in 2013 (Bahout, 2016:14). Similarly, after president Michel Suleiman finished his presidential term in 2014, parliament has been unable to elect a new president and has continually failed to address various political and societal problems (Samaha, 2015). These failings have exacerbated sectarian tensions within the country, which have triggered waves of protests. From 2006 to early 2016 Lebanon was suffering from sectarian conflicts that led to deep Sunni-Shi’a-Christian polarisation as well as creating a paralysed political system and domestic instability (Majed, 2010:9).