The Battle of the River Plate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Battle of the River Plate THE BATTLE OF THE RIVER PLATE THE NEW ZEALAND STORY hen the cruiser The 82-minute engagement between the HMS Achilles Graf Spee and its three smaller British opened fire on opponents –Achilles, Ajax and Exeter – the German was inconclusive. All four were damaged, ‘pocket with the British ships suffering 72 Wbattleship’ Admiral Graf Spee in the fatalities (two of them New Zealanders) South Atlantic, at 6.21 a.m. on 13 to the Graf Spee’s 36. But the German December 1939, it became the first warship’s subsequent withdrawal to the New Zealand unit to strike a blow at neutral Uruguayan port of Montevideo, the enemy in the Second World War. and its dramatic scuttling by its own With the New Zealand ensign flying crew on 17 December, turned the Battle proudly from her mainmast – as battle of the River Plate into a major British loomed, a signalman had run aft with victory – and a welcome morale boost BY IAN MCGIBBON the ensign shouting ‘Make way for the for the Allied cause. Achilles’ role in the History Group, Digger flag!’ – Achilles also became the battle was a special source of pride for Ministry for Culture and Heritage first New Zealand warship to take part New Zealanders, who welcomed the in a naval battle. ship’s crew home at huge parades in PAINTINGS Auckland and Wellington in early 1940. (Cover) Edward S. Annison, The “Achilles” opening the attack on the “Graf Spee”, 1939, oil, Ref: AAAC 898 NCWA 384, National Collection of War Art, Archives New Zealand Frank Norton, HMS “Achilles” in the Battle of the River Plate, 1940, gouache, Ref: AAAC 898 NCWA Q223, National Collection of War Art, Archives New Zealand PHOTOGRAPHY SOURCE S.D. Waters, Achilles at the River Plate, War History Branch, Wellington, 1948 1 NEW ZEALANd’S NAVAL FORCES and personnel. Senior officers, including Britain depended (for Britain’s survival as a In December 1939 the New Zealand naval Achilles’ captain Edward (later Rear-Admiral market and source of military support was forces were a quarter of a century old. Sir Edward) Parry, were seconded British vital to New Zealand). The Royal Navy They had come into being with the arrival officers. In 1939 the New Zealand Division and the many strategically located bases of the decrepit training cruiser HMS comprised 82 officers and 1257 ratings, of it controlled gave Britain the means of Philomel at Wellington in July 1914. Almost whom eight officers and 716 ratings were protecting its vital sea lanes. Although the immediately, however, the outbreak of the New Zealanders; supporting them was a approaches to the British Isles obviously First World War interrupted New Zealand’s 670-strong New Zealand Volunteer Naval needed the most protection, given the naval development plans. Philomel was Reserve. New Zealand sent its personnel to proximity of powerful potential enemies, returned to Admiralty control and headed off Britain for training, relied on British logistic trade protection was a worldwide effort – to the Middle East. For the next three years support, and looked to the Royal Navy coordinated by the Admiralty in London. it was used in a gunboat role, mainly in the for traditions, advice and example. New Zealand’s role was to assist this effort by Persian Gulf, occasionally carrying out shore A small element of the wider British fleet, making available the resources it could spare bombardments and landing shore parties. this force would be placed under the to bolster the collective effort. In 1917, no longer fit for service, it returned operational control of the Admiralty on to New Zealand and was de-commissioned, the outbreak of war, in accordance with The Royal Navy and New Zealand’s defence strategy. THE THREAT TO NEW ZEALAND becoming a depot ship at Devonport. the many strategically Physical protection posed a greater problem. Following the war New Zealand resumed its The biggest threat in the interwar period located bases it naval programme, forming a New Zealand NAVAL STRATEGY seemed to be posed by the Empire’s former controlled gave Britain Between the world wars New Zealand’s ally Japan. With the scuttling of the German Division of the Royal Navy in 1921 and the means of protecting taking control of the cruiser HMS Chatham. defence was conceived as part of an imperial fleet at Scapa Flow in 1919, the Japanese Three years later a more modern cruiser, system based on the power of the Royal Navy. Navy had emerged as the world’s third largest; its vital sea lanes. HMS Dunedin, arrived to replace Chatham. This system provided New Zealand’s physical only the United States and British fleets were Dunedin was joined by its sister ship HMS security from invasion or attack and also larger. Despite a visit by the US battlefleet in Diomede in 1926. Leander-class light cruisers protected the trade routes upon which its 1925 (much larger than any naval visit ever replaced these D-class cruisers in the mid- economy depended. These routes were made by the Royal Navy), New Zealand did 1930s. Achilles joined the New Zealand comparatively restricted in scope because of not count on US support in the event of war The long sea route to Britain – essentially across Division in 1936 and HMS Leander in the the narrow basis of New Zealand’s economy, with Japan. Isolationism was strong there, the Pacific to the Panama Canal and thence following year. which was almost exclusively devoted to and Japan was expected to avoid attacking producing meat, wool and other primary US interests if it went to war with the across the Atlantic – was all-important. As their formal title indicated, the products for the British market. The long sea British Empire. New Zealand naval forces developed within route to Britain – essentially across the Pacific a Royal Navy framework. The cruisers were to the Panama Canal and thence across the But was the Royal Navy strong enough to loaned to New Zealand, which merely paid Atlantic – was all-important. assert its power in the Pacific? The admirals in their running costs – a major advantage for London insisted that it was: they developed a cash-strapped government. New Zealand Both countries had an interest in keeping a strategy centred on a major naval base at also depended upon British expertise open this sea route and the others on which Singapore. In the event of trouble with Japan 2 3 the British battlefleet would concentrate Navy’s America and West Indies Squadron, THE BATTLE OF THE AtLANTIC which guarded an area through which Of all the battles waged during the Second New Zealand trade passed. The other would World War, arguably the most important was ADMIRAL GRAF SPEE remain in the South Pacific to guard shipping the Battle of the Atlantic, the struggle to keep Initially Germany’s interwar Although nominally 10,000 from enemy raiders. open the sea routes to the British Isles. naval development had been tons, Admiral Graf Spee probably The outcome of this battle was vital to the constrained by the 1919 Treaty displaced 14,000 tons (the As the international situation darkened in survival of Britain and, later, to the eventual of Versailles, which imposed Germans having cheated on the the last week of August 1939, the likelihood liberation of Europe by providing a staging strict limits on the size and Versailles limits). It was much of these plans being implemented suddenly point for the intervention of American power. number of warships that it could larger than the British heavy became very real. Both New Zealand This battle, fought by naval and air forces commission. Restricted to a cruisers (about 8000 tons) and cruisers were hurriedly readied for sea. and the civilian seafarers of the Merchant tonnage limit of 10,000 tons, the outgunned them too. Whereas a Ships’ bottoms were cleaned, supplies were Navy, began on the first day of the war and Germans responded by creating British heavy cruiser had 8-inch loaded, and crews were brought up to their continued to the last. a class of armoured cruisers guns, Graf Spee boasted six 11- war complements. In HMS Achilles’ case, this (Panzerschiffe). Although cruisers inch guns in two triple turrets, amounted to 31 officers and 536 ratings – At the outset, the battle also involved denying by tonnage, they carried heavier capable of throwing 294-kilogram of whom five officers and 316 ratings were the Atlantic and other sea routes to Germany. guns than existing cruisers. As a shells 27,000 metres. As secondary New Zealanders. An immediate task for the Royal Navy was result the British dubbed them armament, it had eight 5.9 inch to track down and destroy the estimated 237 ‘pocket battleships’. Three were guns and eight 21-inch torpedo Early on 29 August, with Germany preparing German merchant ships at sea or in foreign launched between 1931 and tubes, and it carried two seaplanes. to invade Poland, the Admiralty requested ports. As well as cutting off German trade, 1934: Deutschland, Admiral It was capable of 28 knots at full that the ships move to their war stations. this action would prevent these vessels being Scheer and Admiral Graf Spee. power of its diesel engines. Seven hours later Achilles put to sea, bound armed and used to prey on Allied trade. for Balboa in Panama’s Canal Zone. there, threatening the flank of any Japanese Soon afterwards HMS Leander was For six weeks Achilles played its part in this drive towards the South Pacific. Accepting dispatched to Fanning Island with a 32-man worldwide effort, moving along the coasts of these assurances, New Zealand contributed detachment to guard the cable station there Chile, Peru, Ecuador and Colombia in order a million pounds towards the construction and prevent a raid such as the German East to deter German ship movements.
Recommended publications
  • Ex HMAS Adelaide Scuttling
    Project Profile Ex HMAS Adelaide Scuttling Client NSW Land & Property Management Authority Location Glebe Island Wharf No. 2, Sydney Harbour, New South Wales Duration 18 months, 2011 Contract Scuttling of Ex HMAS Adelaide Vessel for use as an Artificial Reef Cost $6.5 Million Project Overview Stripping and preparation of former war ship to a virtual skeleton and scuttling off the NSW mid coast. This ship participated in the 1990/91 Gulf War, peacekeeping operations in East Timor in 1999 and deployed to the Arabian Gulf as part of the International Coalition against Terrorism in 2001 and 2004. She was Australia’s first guided-missile frigate and was home-ported in Western Australia. McMahon Services were contracted by NSW Land & Property Management Authority to prepare the vessel for scuttling off the NSW mid coast. This was an enormous task – stripping a fully operational war ship to make it a virtual skeleton. All environmental hazards required total removal. We had to develop methods to make the vessel do what it was never design to do…sink. The vessel was littered with specially cut holes to let water in and air out when it was scuttled. The main task was to penetrate bulkheads and clearing pathways through the vessel so that divers had enough room to manoeuvre through safe thoroughfares. Ex HMAS Adelaide Scuttling | Page 1 Key Milestones: Milestone 1: Establishment and Vessel Delivery Milestone 2: Initial Preparation and Towage Milestone 3: Design and Ship Preparation Milestone 4: Scuttling Milestone 5: Post Scuttling Activities
    [Show full text]
  • Esps Canarias
    European Union Naval Force - Mediterranean ESPS CANARIAS Frigate Santa Maria class Frigate Santa Maria class Length / Beam / Draft 138 m / 14,3 m / 7,5 m Displacement 3,900 t Speed 29 knots (maximum turbine) Source: Spanish Defense website http://www.armada.mde.es The Ship ESPS CANARIAS is the sixth frigate of the 41st Escorts Squadron; she was built by Navantia in Ferrol, and delivered to the Navy in December 1994. ESPS CANARIAS home port is Rota Naval Base in the south of Spain. ESPS CANARIAS is fitted with a helicopter SH-60 and Marine Boarding Team that completes her capabilities and ensures she is capable of conducting the missions and tasks assigned by EUNAVFOR MED. The Santa Maria Class is a multirole warship able to carry out missions ranging from high intensity warfare integrated into a battle group and conducting offensive and defensive operations, to low intensity scenarios against non-conventional threats. Designed primarily to act in the interests of the State in the maritime areas overseas and participate in the settlement crises outside Europe, this leading warship can also be integrated into a naval air force. It may operate in support of an intervention force or protection of commercial traffic and perform special operations or humanitarian missions. The Santa Maria class frigates, like destroyers and corvettes, are given the generic name of escorts with the main task of protecting other units and maintaining sea lines of communications. However, their versatility allows the F-80 frigates to carry out a wide range of missions, which can be grouped into two broad categories: • Maritime Interdiction Operations: known as 'MIO operations', these consist of shipping control in a given area to ensure the maintenance of safe passage within any given restrictions or regulations as ruled by International Organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2018 Pendennis U-Boats Site Report
    Forgotten Wrecks Pendennis U-boats of the First World War Site Report May 2018 Table of Contents i Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................ 3 ii Copyright Statement ........................................................................................................................ 3 iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Project Background ............................................................................................................................. 5 2. Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Desk Based Research .................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Online Information/Sources .................................................................................................. 5 2.1.2 Records at The National Archives .......................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Other Historical Sources ........................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Associated Artefacts ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Fieldwork ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HMS Tyne - Summary of Service 1941-1972
    HMS Tyne - Summary of Service 1941-1972 HMS Tyne was laid down on 15 July 1938 as a Destroyer Depot Ship. Launched at the Greenock yard of Scotts Shipbuilding Company on 28 February 1940, she was completed exactly a year later, four months later than the stipulated contract date. Arriving at Scapa Flow on 3 March 1941, the Tyne became the flagship of Rear Admiral (Destroyers), Home Fleet. She remained as flagship until 18 August 1944, when she left Scapa for her first refit since commissioning; previously, she had undergone short docking periods at Sheerness and then on the Clyde. The six-week refit on the Clyde included the installation of equipment required for service in the Far East and also further improvement to her armament. After a work-up at Scapa, HMS Tyne sailed for Ceylon in mid-November 1944 and arrived at Trincomalee on 11 December to join the Fleet Train, as the flagship of Rear Admiral (D), British Pacific Fleet. The BPF left Ceylon in late January 1945 and after a brief stop at Sydney, the Tyne proceeded to the Fleet's advanced base at Manus, Admiralty Islands. The main body of the Fleet was in action off the Sakishima Gunto from 26 March until 25 May 1945, with a short break at San Pedro Bay, Leyte, at the end of April. HMS Tyne arrived at San Pedro Bay at the beginning of April and remained until 24 May, supporting the 18 destroyers and seven sloops and frigates with the Fleet and Fleet Train. The Tyne returned to Sydney, via Manus, to replenish her stocks of spares and to prepare for service at a new advanced base, closer to Japan itself, at Eniwetok, where the US Navy had agreed to make facilities available for the establishment of a British anchorage for replenishment of Fleet oilier.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Naval Wreck Survey Christopher F
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Presentations Maritime Research Division 2012 South Carolina Naval Wreck Survey Christopher F. Amer University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/mrd_prsn Part of the Anthropology Commons Publication Info 2012. http://www.cas.sc.edu/sciaa/ © 2012 by The outhS Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology This Presentation is brought to you by the Maritime Research Division at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CUA LECTURE: SOUTH CAROLINA NAVAL WRECK SURVEY Slide 1 COVER PAGE Slide 2 SC coast 200 miles from NC to Georgia, twice that counting inlets and bays. Only 30 feet deep out to 5 miles, many treacherous and shifting sandbars. Slide3 Since 16th C thousands of ships visit the coast for exploration, colonization, war and commerce. Many went ashore on the treacherous shoals, and sank for various reasons in the more than 3000 square miles of waterways and rivers, eventually becoming state-owned resources. Slide 4 Among the countless wrecked watercraft in State waters lies a body of naval vessels spanning the years from the American Revolution to modern times. These wrecks are still owned by the Department of the Navy, which maintains custody of all US Navy vessels not specifically relinquished by an act of Congress no matter where they are located in the world. Navy has turned to the states as co-stewards to help in developing management plans for these national treasures.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Navy Ships-Of-The-Line
    U.S. Navy – Ships-of-the-line A Frigate vs A Ship-of-the-Line: What’s the difference? FRIGATE: A vessel of war which is: 1) “ship” rigged, i.e. – with at least three masts (fore, main, & mizzen) & each mast carries the horizontal yards from which the principle sails are set; 2) this “ship-rigged vessel of war” is a FRIGATE because it has one covered, principle gun deck – USS Constitution is therefore a FRIGATE by class (illus. left) SHIP-OF-THE-LINE: A vessel of war which is: 1) “ship” rigged (see above); 2) this “ship-rigged vessel of war” is a SHIP-OF-THE-LINE because it has two or more covered gun decks – HMS Victory is therefore a SHIP-OF-THE-LINE by class (illus. right) HMS Victory (1765); 100+ guns; 820 officers Constitution preparing to battle Guerriere, & crew; oldest commissioned warship in the M.F. Corne, 1812 – PEM Coll. world, permanently dry docked in England Pg. 1 NMM Coll. An Act, 2 January 1813 – for the construction of the U.S. Navy’s first Ships-of-the-line USS Independence was the first ship-of-the-line launched for the USN from the Boston (Charlestown) Navy Yard on 22 June 1814: While rated for 74-guns, Independence was armed with 87 guns when she was launched. USS Washington was launched at the Portsmouth Navy Yard, 1 October 1814 USS Pennsylvania – largest sailing warship built for the USN USS Pennsylvania – rated for 136 guns on three covered gun decks + guns on her upper (spar) deck – the largest sailing warship ever built.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Surya Class Frigate
    SURYA CLASS FRIGATE A trailblazing design, the Surya class takes its place with the Constitution, Saladin and Fed- It wasn’t until 2248 that the Surya—along with the Coventry, Loknar, Saladin and Larson eration as one of the most important ship classes of the Class I era. classes—was able to free up the larger heavy cruisers and assume primary responsibility for defensive/offensive operations. It was from this point forward that these ships began to Originally, the Anton class was set to be produced to uprated specifications—the design build an impressive and fearsome reputation. itself being altered to correct a number of flaws. However, the changes compounded what was already a complicated and complex design. After review, the decision was sub- sequently reversed and existing ships were gradually withdrawn from service. In 2249, the Pralaya (FF 1855), Avenger (FF 1860) and Illustrious (FF 1863) were present with the 8th Fleet at the Battle of Thranstor. The introduction of Phaser weaponry that year and Instead, the ASDB revisited an earlier proposal, the Hunt class Light Cruiser. Little more than its presence on the majority of the Starfleet vessels present at the battle helped ensure a a Ptolemy class transport/tug with more comprehensive armament, Hunt was an intriguing swift and overwhelming Federation victory. The Pralaya was lost with all hands not long af- modification of an already proven design, though it was eventually dropped in favor of the ter, being drawn into an ambush outside the Beta Aurigae star system. Kearsarge class. Throughout the war though, a favored tactic of fleet commanders was to disguise these The potential of a fully armed Ptolemy was not lost on designers though and from this point, vessels as Ptolemy class transport/tugs and use them (usually in groups of 2 or more) as they continued to study various proposals based around it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Pangbournian Record Volume 2
    The Old Pangbournian Record Volume 2 Casualties in War 1917-2020 Collected and written by Robin Knight (56-61) The Old Pangbournian Society The Old angbournianP Record Volume 2 Casualties in War 1917-2020 Collected and written by Robin Knight (56-61) The Old Pangbournian Society First published in the UK 2020 The Old Pangbournian Society Copyright © 2020 The moral right of the Old Pangbournian Society to be identified as the compiler of this work is asserted in accordance with Section 77 of the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, “Beloved by many. stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any Death hides but it does not divide.” * means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior consent of the Old Pangbournian Society in writing. All photographs are from personal collections or publicly-available free sources. Back Cover: © Julie Halford – Keeper of Roll of Honour Fleet Air Arm, RNAS Yeovilton ISBN 978-095-6877-031 Papers used in this book are natural, renewable and recyclable products sourced from well-managed forests. Typeset in Adobe Garamond Pro, designed and produced *from a headstone dedication to R.E.F. Howard (30-33) by NP Design & Print Ltd, Wallingford, U.K. Foreword In a global and total war such as 1939-45, one in Both were extremely impressive leaders, soldiers which our national survival was at stake, sacrifice and human beings. became commonplace, almost routine. Today, notwithstanding Covid-19, the scale of losses For anyone associated with Pangbourne, this endured in the World Wars of the 20th century is continued appetite and affinity for service is no almost incomprehensible.
    [Show full text]
  • A Segunda Guerra Mundial
    AA SSEEGGUUNNDDAA GGUUEERRRRAA MMUUNNDDIIAALL Causas, Estrutura, Consequências Osvaldo Coggiola 1 Indice INTRODUÇÃO, 3 1. UM MASSACRE SEM PRECEDENTES, 5 2. ANTECEDENTES E CAUSAS, 11 3. HITLER E O NAZISMO, 27 4. A GUERRA E O STALINISMO, 42 5. ENTRE EUROPA, ORIENTE E AMÉRICA, 51 6. A FASE INICIAL DA GUERRA NA EUROPA, 57 7. CENÁRIO ASIÁTICO E CENÁRIO MUNDIAL, 65 8. ECONOMIA DE GUERRA, 71 9. HOLOCAUSTO: PREPARAÇÃO, 80 10. HOLOCAUSTO: EXECUÇÃO, 89 11. A URSS EM GUERRA, 98 12. O COMEÇO DA DERROTA DO EIXO, 110 13. O FIM DA GUERRA MUNDIAL, 121 14. REVOLUÇÃO E CONTRARREVOLUÇÃO NA EUROPA, 133 15. DA ECONOMIA BÉLICA À “NOVA ORDEM ECONÔMICA”, 148 16. REVOLTA COLONIAL: ORIENTE MÉDIO E SUDESTE ASIÁTICO, 156 17. REVOLUÇÃO COLONIAL: ÍNDIA E CHINA, 165 18. A CONTRARREVOLUÇÃO METROPOLITANA, 174 CRONOLOGIA, 195 DOCUMENTO 1: A LUTA CONTRA O IMPERIALISMO E CONTRA A GUERRA, 200 DOCUMENTO 2: A GUERRA IMPERIALISTA E A REVOLUÇÃO PROLETÁRIA MUNDIAL, 203 BIBLIOGRAFIA, 224 2 INTRODUÇÃO Não seguimos, no texto que segue, uma sequência cronológica (existem inúmeras obras sobre a Segunda Guerra Mundial que assim o fazem, várias incluídas na bibliografia ao final deste trabalho), mas uma sequência de problemas históricos e historiográficos levantados pelo maior conflito bélico de todos os tempos. Diversos autores postularam a hipótese de que o mundo padeceu, no século XX, uma “Segunda Guerra dos Trinta Anos”, entre 1914 e 1945: “Foram 31 anos, de agosto de 1914 a agosto de 1945. Ainda lhes chamamos, tradicionalmente, Primeira Guerra Mundial (1914-1918) e Segunda Guerra Mundial (1939-1945), mas os futuros historiadores irão fundir os dois conflitos num só..
    [Show full text]
  • Ajax New Past up For
    NEWSLETTER JUNE 2020 CONTENTS Committee Details Chairman's Report Secretary's Report Membership Secretary's Update Bob Batt HMS Achilles Wreath Laying Ceremony Standard Bearer Report New Association Website Battle of the River Plate Commemorative Shield Update Don Birrell Ajax 1946-47 Gifts for Concepción SMS Scharnhorst Wreck Found Faversham Roll of Honour Daily Mirror Pays Tribute Geoffrey Haylett Follow Up Ajax Bell in Council Chambers 2019 Trip Report Publications Thank You Halifax South Shetland Islands Antarctica Archivist Update HMS Exeter Port Engine Telegraph Wheel 1935 - 48 1963 - 85 Nec Quisquam Nisi Ajax www.hmsajax.org 2. 3. I would like to thank the Committee who have contacted Association members to assure them that CHAIRMAN Nigel Masters we are here to help if they require assistance during this uncertain time. The Lookout Golden Cross Terrace This year sees the 65th Anniversary of the Town of Ajax Ontario and we were invited by the Station Road, Swineshead Town's Mayor, Shaun Collier, to attend the Gala celebration in June and incorporate street Boston, Lincolnshire PE20 3LP dedication ceremonies. Unfortunately, like thousands of other events, this has been cancelled – Tel: 01205 820127 Mobile: 07743 381153 nevertheless, thank you Shaun for the invitation. [email protected] It has been mooted that perhaps we will do something in 2021 as this will be the 45th anniversary SECRETARY of the Frigate visit and the 66th Town anniversary! My Wife Janet and I, along with Mike Fox, Peter Danks intend to make the trip to celebrate this. Still very early days but if you were interested let us 104 Kelsey Avenue Southbourne, Emsworth www.hmsajax.org know.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal New Zealand Navy, 1910-2010 Michael Wynd
    Small Steps from Empire to Independence: The Royal New Zealand Navy, 1910-2010 Michael Wynd Cet article explique le lien intime entre la Marine royale britannique et la la Marine royale néozélandaise dans l’histoire nationale et militaire de la Nouvelle-Zélande, une relation qui a commencé tôt dans l’histoire de la colonie avec l’inclusion de la Nouvelle-Zélande dans le cadre de l’Empire britannique. Jusqu’à dans le courant du vingtième siècle, la Nouvelle-Zélande a maintenu des liens étroits avec la Marine britannique et a embrassé avec enthousiasme son rôle de soutien de l’empire, comme peuvent en témoigner les contributions nationales aux deux guerres mondiales. Pour commencer, l’auteur passera en revue les contributions et le développement d’une marine très distinctement néozélandaise. La dernière partie de l’article examine le développement d’après-guerre de la Marine néozélandaise et les principaux changements qu’elle a subis pour devenir la force qu’elle est en 2010. The history of the Royal New Zealand Navy is a progression of small steps from Empire to independence. The navy in New Zealand has followed a very different path when compared to the experience of Australia and Canada. This paper will explore the influence of such factors as the nation’s manpower and financial capacity to build a fleet, perception of New Zealand’s place within the Empire, a growing self-awareness post- 1945, domestic and party factional politics in the 1970s and 1980s, and finally a shift back to multilateralism and cooperation in the past two decades.
    [Show full text]