EU Mediation of the Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue

CEU eTD Collection

Mediation of the Belgrade of the Mediation In partialIn fulfillment ofthe requirements fo Department ofInternational Relations and European Studies Conditionality or Cooperation? EU Cooperation? or Conditionality Supervised by Prof.ErinKristin Jenne Central European University Budapest, Hungary Shannon O’Toole Submitted to 2015

r the degree Mastersof of Arts

- Pristina Dialogue Pristina

Word 16,560 Count:

CEU eTD Collection Brussels of normalization relations Agreement onthe and the EuropeanUnion encouraging of thedevelopment international interrupt conflict can in 1991byBrian and Tomlin, Brian Mandell argues W. S. it of thatmediators breakthrough why are occasionally stalemates b This Abstract

Kosovo demonstrates howsuch thesis

looks tothe criticallooks governing explain to role conflict normsplay in systems

Drawing on a constructivist approachDrawing on developed tointernational mediation - backedBelgrade mediation of the

shared roken at times when thereatroken when times isno

the self

normative change precipitated thelandmark2013

norms between casenorms disputing A of parties. study - reinforcing byconflict natureof systems i

between thetwo. - Pri stina dialogue between Serbia obvious

catalyst

for afor CEU eTD Collection Popovic, Milos Balkans. Western the FileOn Controversies and Zimmerman Sam husband, my of Zimmerman support and love unfailing the acknowledge to wish also I and encouragement were thoughtfu whose Jenne, Kristin Erin supervisor, my to gratitude sincere offer I Acknowledgements

. parents, my as well as , Thanks to my to Thanks

and Sasikumar Shanmugasundaram

Advice

ess , who encouragedoften who (and ,

colleagues from colleagues ential

from to the completion ofproject this Zlatko Filipović Zlatko aei OToe Jh O’ John O’Toole, Valerie ii Facts On File Wor File On Facts

, is John Harbord John

also ,

patiently tolerated) myin patientlyinterest tolerated)

appreciated ld News Digest News ld . , Natalia Andrea Peral, Andrea Natalia ,

Toole ,

n Ellen and l guidance l and Issues Issues uel

CEU eTD Collection Chapter 8: Brussels The Agreement Chapter 7: Interregnum Chapter 6: The First Breakthrough Chapter 5: Dispute Escalation Chapter 4: Early Technical Agreements Chapter 3: Background to Serbia the Chapter 2: Norms ConflictGovern Systems Chapter 1: How CanMediators Break a Stalemate? Int ofList Figures ofList Abbreviations Acknowledgements Abstract Table of Contents What Triggered Brusselsthe Agreement? BelgradeThe BelgradeThe What Trigge Interruption the Belgradeof Why did theDispute Escalate? BelgradeThe What Prompted theEarly Technical Agreements? Bringing Parties the to Table DecisionICJ The and Serbia’s Turning Point Failed Negotiations Precede Indepen An Inconclusive War Research Design Norms Define O Argument:The A New Normative Order Can Break Stalemates Ratio Justification for Research Thesis Outline roduction: Unlikely An Agreement Normative Evolution Normative Evolution Normative Evolution Effects of theDialogue’s Postponement Normative Evolution FifthThe Round One Data Sources Methodo The Case: The Serbia Indicators ofNormative Evolution nalist Explanations for the Brussels Agreement

logy - red Firstthe Breakthrough? Round Breakthrough

- - -

Pristina dialogue: March 8 Pristina dialogue: December 2011 Pristina dialogue: September ptions and Construct Conflicts

Kosovo Dispute

Pristina dialogue: July 20

dence Declaration -

Kosovo Dispute

–

July 4, 2011 iii –

December, 2011

–

March 2012

–

September 2011

12 55 50 44 36 29 19 16 14 53 48 41 40 34 32 31 17 16 16 12 55 51 45 44 38 37 31 29 26 24 22 19 vi ii 5 1 v 9 7 5 3 i

CEU eTD Collection Bibliography Appendix 1: Text of the Brussels Agreement Conclusion A Norms Policy Implications for the EU BelgradeThe Normative Evolution BrusselsThe Agreement - Based Approach Mediation to

- Pristina dialogue: March 2012

iv –

April 2013

71 69 63 61 59 66 65 56

CEU eTD Collection UNMIK SAA RTK OSCE NATO KLA KIPRED KFOR ICJ EU EU List of

LEX

Abbreviations United Nations Mission inUnited Nations Mission Kosovo and Association AgreementStabilization Radio Organization forand Security Cooperation inEurope North Atlantic TreatyOrganization LiberaKosovo InstituteKosovo Policy Development for and Research Kosovo Force International of Court Justice EuropeanLaw of UnionRule M European Union - Television Kosovo

tion Army tion

ission in Kosovo in ission

CEU eTD Collection Fig 1: List ofFigures Kosov o map withethnicdistributions o map

vi , 2008.

CEU eTD Collection idUSBRE93L0IC20130422 accessed May 20,2015, 2 historic accessed May 1,2015, 1 catalyst obvious any afteraccordreached. was the that recommended Commission European the EU; the with negotiations membership begin to Serbia for path the cleared policy official institutions parallel disassembling suggests territorial claims thatSerbia’s toKosovoare now declaration 2008 unilateral independence, Kosovo’s recognize never will Serbia that maintain schools para Serbian backed longstanding of devolution the outlined and relations, normalized for basis a established Agreement Brussels the as known accord 2013 April The them. between Union 1998 the of close inconclusive Introduction

“ Smoilar,Piotr “Serbia KosovoSignAgreement,” and Historic Timeline: Serbia's tro – - The start to move Serbia’s and Agreement, Brussels the of conclusion The — stalemate the broke years two only in sides the between negotiations mediated of years After agreement in

ocuino h rses gemn perdt come to appeared Agreement Brussels the of conclusion ll institutions llel ooos northern, Kosovo’s — th the Kosovar government’s sovereignty over all of the territory it claimed it territory the of all over sovereignty government’s Kosovar the Srin gemn t devolve to agreement Serbian e : An Unlikely Agreement Unlikely : An - brussels

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/apr/30/serbia bitter ubled path talks EU to accession ubled http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/22/us n pi 21 ta pope te accord the prompted that 2013 April in

. . —

rdok ewe Sri ad ooo ht ucee the succeeded that Kosovo and Serbia between gridlock

- nldn mncpl oenet, euiy ocs and forces, security governments, municipal including 99 Kosovo War, it is remarkable that a series of European European of series a that remarkable is it War, Kosovo 99

accession negotiations negotiations accession majority n ot oooadt accept to and Kosovo north in - Serb Serb 1

provinces

h nrh ooo aall institutions parallel Kosovo north the with Serbia with ,”

. primarily Reuters 1

While Serbian officials officials Serbian While Guardian , April 22, 2013, , April 22, —

begin just three days days three just begin symbolic. symbolic. n prac in - serbia R . suddenly , 30 April 2013, , at iei o in not if tice - ional eu - kosovo

- , without without , - choice - still

of - CEU eTD Collection normative this without that holds and transformation, ones, cooperative into norms adversarial Belgrade the the result ofa rational Serbian historic the within leveraged 2013, April and 2011 March between place taking rounds negotiation of series a during mediators, the this Tomlin, W. Brian and Mandell S. thatprecipitatedposition theBrussels Agreement? on migration forced of waves and killed people 10,000 least at saw that war fought bitterly another for frozen completely been had Kosovo pressingSe commence could Serbia and EU the between Kosovo with relations normalize and institutions parallel of Serbian take it did why them, oppose to than demands EU with comply to beneficial more was it that deciding Serbia of matter a simply were it If timing. its explain cannot explanations

a massive scale. What was the catalyst for the sudden, fundamental change in Serbia’s Serbia’s in changefundamental sudden, the forcatalyst the was What scale. massive a Through a longitudinal analysis of the E the of analysis longitudinal a Through a on Drawing agreement ficials to make that calculation? The EU’s position EU’s The calculation? that make to ficials dispute betweenthem dispute rbia to rbia o h rses Agreement Brussels the for - rsia ilge ti thesis this dialogue, Pristina the Brussels Agreement wouldnot the meet thosecriteriameet . Accordingly, it rejects the notion that the Serbian reversal was solely solely was reversal Serbian the that notion the rejects it Accordingly, . lesser h da o E membership EU of draw the - known - choicecalculation inEU conditionality. rooted

new, cooperativnew,

theory proposed in 1991 by mediation scholars Brian scholars mediation by 1991 in proposed theory

for at least four least atfor

that i ofr a osrciit ruet ht EU that argument constructivist a offers sis 2

describes hinge on hinge was not new in 2013. The EU had been been had EU The 2013. in new not was U e norms e -

mediated negotiation rounds known as as known rounds negotiation mediated have decade

years.R

o Sri ad Kosovo and Serbia for been possible. been

the power of EU conditionality conditionality EU of power the that created a foundation for the for foundation acreated that

h tasomto o certain of transformation the before that, in the wake of a a of wake the in that, before eoe ceso negotiations accession before elations between Serbia and and Serbiabetween elations

that Serbia that

must dismantle must

o embed to years

for for

CEU eTD Collection with aseries for ofpolicy recommendations theEU. negotiation norms cooperative of concluded. w survey methodology ones cooperative into norms adversarial of capable are mediators a with begins latter best explain the that prove to ones normative against theories rationalist test will I how of description methodology mediation systems, conflict in norms Agreement Brussels the of conclusion unlikely and Thesis Outline e E mdae tls ea, and began, talks mediated EU hen os nt argue to on goes hpe 3 eiw te itr o te Kosovo the of history the reviews 3 Chapter 2 Chapter The sre of series a

ht cons o tee om; a norms; these for accounts that

T first chapter of this thesis this of chapter first outcome

hese empirical chapters argue chapters empirical hese for for n

xlnto of explanation measuring

explains the theoretical framework for the Serbia the for framework theoreticalthe explains how esrn nraie evolution normative measuring itnt hss f h Serbia the of phases distinct s .

that that the Serbia cnlso summ conclusion A ihn h Serbia the within rational

raig sta breaking I mediator

ae cs fr cntutvs apoc t international to approach constructivist a for case a make

- o nrs oen ofit systems conflict govern norms how Kosovo stalemate was broken.Kosovo stalemate - choice theories choice - induced normative change a system.within conflict induced normative

explains pi 2013, April . eae by lemates It subsequently explains Mandell and T and Mandell explains subsequently It

- that 3 rzs h cs suys findings study’s case the arizes ooo ofit system conflict Kosovo

brief overview of of overview brief .

the After After the establishment (or non (or establishment the - ooo conflict Kosovo

research question and question research

cannot explain what precipitated the the precipitated what explain cannot foll when the Brussels Agreement was was Agreement Brussels the when norgn te rnfrain of transformation the encouraging introducing ows - Serbia . The chapter closes with a a with closes chapter The .

tlmt. hpes 4 Chapters stalemate. the

Mandell and Tomlin’s Tomlin’s and Mandell - between Kosovo c Kosovo

fundamental , produced

and and

- its importance, its establishment)

ac 2011, March ad closes and , ase study. It study. ase argues

omlin’s

certain certain role of role

that that - 8

CEU eTD Collection dangers 22, 1999,accessed20, 2015, May 4 release_PRES Declaration 3 inevitable the propagate which Balkans, further Balkan the of future “the that Declaration Thessaloniki

Michael Kaufman,“ European Commission

t t cr, hs hss eset te historic the reasserts thesis this core, its At - ek t ued ogtnig rps bu “nin htes i the in hatreds” “ancient about tropes longstanding upend to seeks of . 4 -

letting

, June 21,2003 , June - 03 - - 163_en.htm a - president The Dangers of Letting Dangers Reada of The President ,

EU ,

accessed - Western Thessaloniki, 21June 2003 Summit: Balkans -

. read.html

erroneous http://www.nytimes.com/1999/05/22/books/

May 20,2015 .

otnin ht conflict that contention 4

http://europa.eu/rapid/press

s is in the European Un European the in is s otnin n the in contention ,” New York New York Times n srf tee are there strife and

EU’s the - , May Western Western - ion.

2003 ” 3

CEU eTD Collection ABCCA: 5 to led Research for Justification thebreakthrough.explain Afinal section and 2013, in broken was Kosovo argues mediation. and negotiations, conflict, international of Balkans, studies Western to the contribution in expand to seeks it as EU the for implication Kosovo budge. to the characteri of unlikelihood. deal’s the to testament a is media international the of attention the caught people 66,000 only to home land of plot That Hashim Minister 2013 1: Chapter

Fred M,Shelley,

post

post , a somewhat somewhat a

ocuin between conclusion - h Busl Agreement’s Brussels the first chapter This ? 19, April the breakthrough historic a as trumpeted world the around outlets Media ht ainls tere cno epan h te tlmt bten eba and Serbia between stalemate the why explain cannot theories rationalist that - conflict stalemate between two ethnically defined sides whose relationship was relationship whose sides defined ethnically two between stalemate conflict International war dispute over Kosovo’s status had failed completely, with both sides both with completely, failed had status Kosovo’s over dispute war

zed by bitterness and mistrust. and bitterness by zed - How did How CLIO, 2013) 74. How Can Mediators Break aSta Break Mediators Can How Thaçi nebulous

Nation Shapes: TheStory B Nation the

relations relations

EU mediation EU

of the 15 the of

argues that an answer to this question holds holds question this to answer an that argues

framework

eba Pie iitr Ivica Minister Prime Serbian

scholars

that the critical role of norms must b must norms of role critical the that point deal that became known as Brussels Agreement. Brussels as known became that deal point civmn. I achievement.

effort 5 agreement involving a 1,300 a involving agreement

Indeed, the Brussels Agreement capped Agreement Brussels the Indeed, aent xesvl tde h cniin that conditions the studied extensively not have

offers an overviewoffers an of Two p Two

break the bitter stalemate between Serbia and and Serbiabetween stalemate bitter the break 5

ehind the World's the ehind Borders revious sed ms ltrtr adesn the addressing literature most nstead, attempts lemate? Dačić

researchdesign.

by the U.N. the by

- kilometer (500 kilometer n Ksv Prime Kosovo and

e accounted for to for accounted e

important (Santa Barbara,(Santa

and offers a a offers and

to mediate to

14 year 14

refusing refusing It then then It policy - mile) mile) s

CEU eTD Collection 1986 7 implementation oft candidatePh.D. over2015 paperUniversity the ina atofPristina, assesseddisputes the (KIPRED New Policy 6 for create cost to new ability mediator’s disputants a or conflict, a of ripeness the on hinges mediation hav which mediation, thesis this efforts, mediation resolved. is it until anddecades, two lingered hasfor that Republi the and Federation Croat useful be might strategy o within disputes other resolve norms reproducible, a for blueprint Balkans. is Yugoslavia former the of reconstruction the on literature to contributes agreement Moreover, Agreement. Brussels the of a Serbia toward policy EU successful guide briefs policy and reports Belgrade

Peter These suchby, as includethose produced the by reports among Belgrade others,

becoming ) 41

Carnevale, n diin o feig oiy eomnain t te U eadn future regarding EU the to recommendations policy offering to addition In

- - utemr, a Furthermore, 56 Pristina dialogue and the Brussels Agreement is Agreement Brussels the and dialogue Pristina ; and the International Group,aand Crisis the Brussels ;

. Center; Center;

nraigy eeat s the as relevant increasingly

“Strategic Choice inMediation

he Brussels Agreement. the Kosovar InstituteKosovar the for Policy Development and Research - eei cluain b apyn cros n sticks. and carrots applying by calculations benefit be ngetd n ao o approaches of favor in neglected been e .

6 to an to study

A survey

al fr coas o eii cntutvs apoce to approaches constructivist revisit to scholars for calls

EU attempt to mediate the dispute dispute the mediate to attempt EU of the conditions that led to the agreement agreement the to led that conditions the of aog p among r ka Srpska in Bosnia in Srpska ka

of the conditions that led to the agreement can help can agreement the to led that conditions the of -

ae srtg te U ih epo i odr to order in employ might EU the strategy based which n xmnto o the of examination an

U continues EU

tnil ebr tts I states. member otential nd Kosovo as it oversees the implementation the oversees it as Kosovo nd 6 will keep Bosniakeep will

, ” Negotiation JournalNegotiation - Herzegovina - fot t itgae h Western the integrate to efforts based NGO. Adem Beha,abased Adem NGO. comprised of implementation of comprised - Herzegovina run ta successful that arguing dialogue preceding the the preceding dialogue — between priua, uh a such particular, n a political stalemate stalemate political a

2, no.1

out of the EUthe of out the 7 can offer a a offer can

Ripeness,

Bosniak ( - January based based , which , -

CEU eTD Collection Zartman, 172 Resolution, Conflict InRichard Jackson, and “Constructivism Conflict Resolution,” Rienner, 1996) 11 Theory and TheoreticalIn Uses andEvidence,” Empirical 8 Zartman, 7 International Mediation Theory in andPractice I.Saadia Zartman, Touval William “Introduction: Mediation inTheory,”In and the north, and by Kosovo to claims maintaining in was there than agenda conditionality, took reversal Serbian r A a employ conflict successful to roadmap management methodological a reveal might process mediation act or certainposition, disputant and Ratio stalemates. more history. and sticks and carrots,

Jacob Bercovitch and Allison Houston, “The Study of International BercovitchJacob Houston,“The Studyand Allison of Mediation: ational cost nalist nalist aal o adesn fundamental addressing of capable Rationalist - benefit calculations calculations benefit s ot ad eeis ca benefits and costs ’s

particular ist -

17 (Boulder: Westview Press, Inc., WestviewPress, 17 (Boulder: 1985). 8 Practice of MediationPractice of Explanations ;

explanation a 189 (Los Angeles; London: 2009).Angeles;189 (Los SAGE, But a constructivist approach to mediation prioritizing normative views is views normative prioritizing mediation to approach constructivist a But by

hr ws rae bnft in benefit greater was there mediator refusi - 35. approaches to to approaches ma

lever to lever edited by I.Kremenyuk,Wi Bercovitch,and Victor Jacob

tter, of course, of tter, in a in ng authorities.Kosovar toacknowledge place

might o te ocuin f h Busl Areet hold Agreement Brussels the of conclusion the for

particular for the Brussels Agreement the Brussels for change that calculatio that change are attractive are after

s tudy poue snil epaain o why for explanation sensible a produce n , edited byBercovitchLondon:Lynne (Boulder; Jacob conflict

eba officials Serbian manner. For manner.

as do conflict conditions, conflict do as disputants’ cost disputants’ -

resolution resolution for their logical nature. logical their for 7

Resolving International Conflicts: the Resolving iareet, n utmtl, breaking ultimately, and disagreements, opyn wt te Us normalization EU’s the with complying , eds.

mediators, rationalist approaches to the the to approaches rationalistmediators, n

in a manner that produces that manner a in

Saadia TouvalI.William and

that prioritize prioritize that - benefit calculat benefit calculated

funding The SAGE HandbookThe SAGE of

negotiator

An assessment of each of assessment An that

utility maximization maximization utility parallel structures in structures parallel ions, and decide decide and ions, n ih o EU of light in

personalities, they hold a a hold they lliam lliam an accord. accord. an s

ht the that to

CEU eTD Collection EU Enlargement 10 http://www.economist.com/blogs/easternapproaches/2011/09/serbia 2011, accessed2015, May 12, 9 calculation. 2008 during sticks Kosovo 2013 and 2008 between static 2013 before Serbia pronouncement, basic benefitoffered tothem conditions enough strong is Enlargement” Vachudova Anna to order conditionality, operate. to continued Kosovo in institutions indicated

“SerbiaKosovo: ABreak and Customary From Hostilities,”

Andrew oee, i However, A precluded access

fter Kosovo’s Kosovo’s fter that Germany would block Serbian EU membership as long as Serbian parallel Serbian as long as membership EU Serbian block would Germany that

. Moravcsik

“A , For example, p example, For according to rationalist accounts rationalist to according offer support for this explanation, noting that the that noting explanation, this for support offer pplicants are forced into concess into forced are pplicants

Serbia benefits

,” that it allows the allows it that

in their 2003 working paper “Nation paper working 2003 their in

- Serbian EU membership. Moreover, Moreover, membership. EU Serbian C 13 that would have made a significant impact on Serbia’s cost Serbia’s on impact significant a made have would that 13 f enter forenter

Serbia’s an subsequently

associated with EU membership EU with associated ol hv are t dismant to agreed have would d Milada Annad Vachudova,

2008 re — - E

accession membership uropean te rsne f Serbian of presence the : cost independence declaration, declaration, independence EU

- eei cluain bcm cer pn Merkel’ upon clear became calculations benefit calculated that that it was in its interest to interest its in was it that that calculated to

S funding

tudies enforc — 9 8

Under a ration a Under

is of such greatis ofsuch value.” .

Working Paper, e ions The —

upon potential upon perhaps the most the perhaps

,” they claim, they ,” “ EU position position EU National Interests,National State Power, and e paralle le al Interests, State Power, and EU EU and Power, State Interests, al the EU did not emplo not did EU the . - Andrew Moravcsik and Milada and Moravcsik Andrew akd aall ntttos in institutions parallel backed alist explanation emphasizing explanation alist Chancellor Angela Merkel Merkel Angela Chancellor Economist,

97, (August 2002) 97, (August draw of EU membership EU of draw members institutio l on the matter remained matter the on

“ -

precisely because the the because precisely powerful EU powerful and 10

- kosovo

September

non ns y carrots or or carrots y - n Kosovo in negotiable . do so do

- tool

benefit benefit 10.

for for

in s

CEU eTD Collection https://euobserver.com/enlargement/127187 EUobserver 11 neg the to sides two the brought EU The of bedrock the as served Serbia and Kosovo between mistrust likely not will an deeply is sides two between relationship normative th could break not thestalemate. While mediator Brussel the concluded only negotiators Kosovar and Serbian deal. landmark a for foundation a as served that norms cooperative new, dispute Serbia Kosovo the within embed to membership EU of draw the leveraged Belgium, 2011 Brussels, the of sessions over Ashton, Catherine and the intensiveEU mediation effort that immediatelypreceded thedeal. e to rationalistfail approaches behavior. puzzling for explanation methodical straightforward, a offer they that annually million conditionality imposing

cnlc, hy lo moe iiain o otos vial t te cos I the If actors. the to available options on limitations impose also they conflict, e Nikolaj N EU conditionality was critical in bringing the parties to the table, but on its own its on but table, the to parties the bringing in critical was conditionality EU Existing normative views among parties to a conflict not only define the nature of of nature the onlydefine not conflict a to parties among views normative Existing The Argument: Cooper Robert mediators EU after only achieved was Agreement Brussels The r sum, In - induced establishment of cooperative norms created a created norms cooperative of establishment induced , January 13, 2015, accessed2015, , January May 13, 13, ielson, “EU Funding for Well Serbia

exist within the normative arenanormative the within exist

ationalist explanations for explanations ationalist between 2007and 2013. between — ANew

a nvr ikd o h ise and issue, the to linked never was

xplain why the stalemate was broken, and ignore the role of role of and the why ignore was stalemate xplain broken, the

Nor mative Order Order mative 11 otiating table with EU carrots EU with table otiating

Serbia’s

. 9

where - Spent, SaysBudget Watchdog,” EU

Can Break Break Stalemates Can sudden reversal sudden

- the dispute plays out. playsout. dispute the 3 B 13 tagonistic, the option to cooperate cooperate to option the tagonistic, elgrade an

remained foundation adversarial relationship. adversarial s Agreement after the the after Agreement s - Pristina dialogue in in dialogue Pristina may be appealing in appealing be may

— tay at steady for Serbia, the Serbia, for

for an accord. an for In

2011, €170 €170 deep But But - CEU eTD Collection Manage Kissinger Conflict: inthe East,” Middle 12 reorder to ones transformat normative behavior, conflict govern East Middle the in “Media paper, system conflict greatwas enough tounblock the transformation they gains, small of series a upon incrementally Building behavior. cooperative reinforced and induced and incapable ofchanging this 1998 the of end the since negotiation cooperative a for necessary other each trust not did sides two the that perception negotiati However, future. distant more the in membership perhaps and liberalization visa of pledge a Kosovo, for and membership, of possibility

Mandell, BrianBrian W and S., is more likely to produce durable resolutions than is simply using carrots and sticks and carrots using simply is than resolutions durable produce to likely more is T Ashton, and Cooper However, n rcs a a zero a as process on he theory that mediators that theory he iptns cost disputants’ tion in the Development of N of Development the in tion

of an adversarial norm into into norm adversarial an of cooperative was developed by developed was wt ngtaos rm eba n Kosovo, and Serbia from negotiators with , . ” 12 ion

o ol d te cam ht eitr cn hne om that norms change can mediators that claim they do only Not

, -

99 war demonstrated demonstrated war 99 - because

eei calculations. benefit hy ru ta mediators that argue they engagement with the other side was impossible. M impossible. was side other the with engagement

adversarial u game; sum

path to EU membership forpath EU both. to membership

. Tomlin, . Tomlin, can Brian S. S. Brian elcn avrail xettos ih cooperative with expectations adversarial replacing help root new cooperative norms cooperative new root help enough to participate in the sort of give of sort the in participate to enough . hog ter eito efrs i efforts mediation their through norm on their own. norm on A continued lack of of lack continued A d 10 one that allowed a degree of coo of degree a allowed that one orms and How to Manage Conflict: Kissinger Conflict: Manage to How and orms “Mediation theDevelopm in Mandell and Mandell as were eals

Journal ofPeace Research

that the sides were both uninterested i uninterested both were sides the that E ry omtv transformation normative arly n ac 2011 March in

precluded by a shared normative normative shared a by precluded should Brian W. W. Brian

cooperative ultimately dp ti strategy this adopt

Tomlin Tomlin both sides saw the the saw sides both ent of Norms to ent of in an adversar an in , 28:1,43

in their 1991 their in achieved the the achieved peration th peration engagement engagement Brussels n - and oreover , they s, - - take take 55. ial ial of of at n , ,

CEU eTD Collection p. 43. 13 and Kosovowithou demonstra a in based cost disputants’ changing by disputes resolve to directly previously. existed had none where behavior, cooperative accommodate to space new created it manner, a encourage Agreement subsequent the and Kosovo, and Serbia between to inc Tomlin and Mandell time, over change precipitated ultimately a of prompted deals years few a of the followed 1973 Kissinger’s resolutions creat argue,

Mandell and Tomlin, vrail ns Ti iceetl rcs o “omtv eouin” hy argue, they evolution,” “normative of process incremental This ones. dversarial reasedcooperation among onlimitingandconflict disputants managing This thesis applies Mandell and Tomlin’s Tomlin’s and Mandell applies thesis This look Tomlin and Mandell theory, their test To confront . , 13 transformation of transformation igd n t on hinged e

end of the 1973 Arab 1973 the of end

helped facilitate agree facilitate helped fudto fr oe xasv futu expansive more for foundation a both

- non 76 mediation of the negotiations between Israel and Egypt, which which Egypt, and Israel between negotiations the of mediation 76 t altering theexisting It the establishment of cooperative norms, and norms, cooperative of establishment the - tion cooperative norms are superior to rationalist approaches that seek seek that approaches rationalist to superior are norms cooperative

furth “Mediation in the Developm in “Mediation the the

e Us blt to ability EU’s he

that the EU was able to negotiate a settlement between Serbia Serbia between settlement a negotiate to able was EU the that er ap ai Accords. David Camp

the rus that argues norms - Israeli War. War. Israeli ments between the two sides, and sides, two the between ments they identified three patterns of behavior that led led that behavior of patterns three identified they

incentives forincentives cooperation. that

11 constructivist constructivist

leverage egulated They argue that that argue They model - eei calculations benefit conclusion of the the of conclusion ent ofNorms toManage Conflict o hw h poes f normative of process the show To ed

the h da o E membership EU of draw the

to argue that argue to to U.S. Secretary of State Henry State of Secretary U.S. to approaches Serbia re agreements, and lasting lasting and agreements, re

- Kissinger over a period period a over Kissinger the Kosovo

simultaneous a 14 a

. This argument is is argument This . landmark landmark o mediation to

that this series of series this that

- dispute year stalemate stalemate year .

Brussels . In this .

decay

,” ,” that

CEU eTD Collection to efforts EU’s the to Europe in peace lasting credited Nobel they when the 2012, declared in Laureates unthinkable,” is France and Germany between war “today, But pe a over wars three fought which France, and Germany between relationship fraught historically the instance for take decay: also can norms Antagonistic previously prohibited been b acceptable of varieties new for room making time, over intensify can cooperation will between them normat a hold groups two If in. engage may sides opposing the behavior acceptable of range a define norms constructed socially system, conflict any In belongs. party a which to group a within permissible of identities the identity, own one’s Conflicts Construct and Options Norms Define howmediatorsection explains which and Kosovo, and the as served beliefs norms of set particular a of transformation the stalemat breakcan mediators that explains section second The systems. c in norms of role the establishing foundation theoretical a lays first chapter This systems. conflict governing in play norms role critical the understand to necessary is it 2: Chapter om ae ady ttc hwvr te eeg ad ea. naoitc norms Antagonistic decay. and emerge they however; static, hardly are Norms of aspects things, other among define, that beliefs constructed socially are Norms confli intractable of systems disrupt can mediators how understand to order In

Norms Govern Norms

mechanism

permitted — such as acts of violence that signal the outbreak of a war. a of outbreak the signal that violence of acts as such -

induced normative induced normative not

that both allowed the 14 the allowed both that

v preto o ec ohr s enemies, as other each of perception ive

be Conflict Systems Conflict an EU mediator to break it. it. break to mediator EU an others, and the scope of behavior that is considered is that behavior of scope the and others,

an available option. 12

A hr section third A . changes are

year stalemate between Serbia Serbia between stalemate year

measured. Fina

argues that that argues riod of seventy years. seventy of riod l, methodology a lly, es by encouraging encouraging byes

ehavior that had that ehavior normative normative extensive onflict onflict ct, CEU eTD Collection 44 16 International Organization 15 http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/201 Nobelprize.org. Nobel Me 14 dominant their using By visible. previously new not revealing were that thus cooperation norms, for adversarial windows of decay the encouraging by cycle vicious adversarial between relationship disputants. the reinforces turn in conflict of system this and operate, they which in system conflict codetermined. and constituted mutuallyas viewed systemsmaybe conflict that mannerthis in It unreasonable.is as side opposing the of perceptions reinforces turn, in conflict, continued of system established becom cooperation with, reasoned claim. they disputes,” reinforce, and of, out grow that those be to likely subsystems…are conflict in con and hand, one the on norms, adversarial adversarial normsthat block cooperation inabilateral conflict. as structures “‘codetermined and agents of concept constructivist Wendt’s Alexander apply Tomlin that remainproduceand constantstalemates. conflicts frozen can “ advance

Mandell and Tomlin, “Mediation in theDevelopmentMandell of in Norms and Manage “Mediation Tomlin, to Conflict,” Alexander,Wendt, “The Agent T - 45. he Nobel 201 Peace Prize

Mandell and Tomlin argue, however, that powerful mediators can can mediators powerful that however, argue, Tomlin and Mandell mutually are structures and agents as Just and Mandell processes, mediation in norms of development the of study their In peace and reconciliation, democracy and human right human and democracy reconciliation, and peace 16

In other words, words, other In ,’ or ‘mutually constituted,’ entities” to explain the persistence of of persistence the explain to entities” constituted,’ ‘mutually or ,’

dia AB2014. Retrieved14Mayfrom 2015, , 41:3(August335 1987): 2 tothe European (EU) Union when disputing parties believe the opposing side cannot be cannot side opposing the believe parties disputing when

In other words, disputants’ normative beliefs create the the create beliefs normative disputants’ words, other In - Structure Problem in International Structure in Problem Relations,” es impossible and the conflict continues. An An continues. conflict the and impossible es 13 flict systems, on the other. “Dominant norms “Dominant other. the on systems, flict

- 370. osiue, hy ru, o are so argue, they constituted,

- 2/press.html

Press Release". Release". Press 15

s.”

Anta .

gonistic norms gonistic nerp the interrupt CEU eTD Collection 45. 17 of mediation Kissinger’s of study Tomlin’s and Mandell from borrow ofIndicatorsNormative Evolution offered. mediator the of departure the survive to likely more solutions durable produce can cooperation normative encouraging of strategy a Thus been. had ones antagonistic the as manner constituted” cooperat Moreover, conflict. a fuels that antagonism reciprocal of system the disrupts disputants between norms cooperative fosters who mediator a contrast, In trust. mutual of establishment col to vulnerable offering of strategy cost disputants’ change to rationalist penalties applying and incentives A views. normative disputants’ for account to fails ha ones cooperative with replaced, only even by cooperation.” if partially, time in and this modified are behavior conflict In of “expectations argue, agreements. Tomlin and Mandell substantial more to on move may parties established, technical smaller, with starts that agreements process This up. bottom the from changes normative c mediators change,” incremental promote to “lever a as disputants over position

Mandell and To

o esr te vlto o coeaie norms cooperative of evolution the measure To conflict A

, or the expiration of any temporary guarantees the mediator might have have might mediator the guarantees temporary any of expiration the or , establish a degree of degreea establish - mlin, “Mediation in theDevelopment of in Norms Manage “Mediation to mlin, Conflict,” as bcue t rae ls sae o coeain n a gradual a and cooperation for space less creates it because lapse resolution strategy that specifically seeks to replace adversarial norms adversarial replace to seeks specifically that strategy resolution v nrs r self are norms ive

s greater potential to produce durable agreements than one that one than agreements durable produce to potential greater s

mutual trust between sides. Once a degree of trust is trust of degreea Once betweensides. trust mutual - utiig n h sm “oeemnd mutually “codetermined, same the in sustaining 14

n mediated a in - benefit calculations is more is calculations benefit

h Israel the negotiation

an foster foster an manner, - Egypt I ,

CEU eTD Collection Kissnger inthe 19 p. 53. 18 acceptance and thedegre ofa mediator, the is transformation norm relationship.” co [can] cooperation limited that learned [have] door the at politics their check to ability disputants’ The conflict. the driving is dispute political divisive whatever from issues ability willingnessand describeasTomlin disputants’ more a ofthetest theintentions other.” “to leads expectation This obligations. accommodativ defined certain meet to is opponent willing their that disputants of the among forms expectation routine associated an both and exchange create disputants between exchange of patterns observable relationship adversarial cooperative an of evolution normative that argue They dispute.

Mandell and Tomlin, “Mediation in theDevelopmentMandell of in Norms and Manage “Mediation Tomlin, to Conflict: theDevelopmentMandell of in Norms and Manage “Mediation Tomlin, to Conflict,”

The third pattern of cooperative behavior Mandell and Tomlin deem important to important deem Tomlin and Mandell behavior cooperative of pattern third The the is pattern second The the is indicators these of first The one are seen in the are seen one 19 e relationship between the parties, as each has had sufficient opportunityto sufficienthad each has as parties,betweenthe relationship e

Middle East,”Middle p.52.

om f eitd negotiation mediated of norm 18 developmentcooperative of three key norms.

om f ucinl cooperation functional of norm

e to which theye towhich onthemediator. rely

“at minimum,” they argue, shows that “parties that shows argue, they minimum,” “at 15 om f reciprocity of norm

- ex ist with competition in an adversarial an in competition with ist to

separate , explained as disputants’ disputants’ as explained , Te uhr age tha argue authors The .

technical and functional technical , which Mandell and and Mandell which ,

in o a to t

CEU eTD Collection and created were norms cooperative which in process incremental the describes Kosovo, and Serbia between Methodology culminated inthe Brussels Agreement. coo establish incrementally to sides Kosovar the and encouraged Serbian it which with method a as conditionality used 2013, April and 2011 bot March between of conflict the of mediation intense its during EU, the However, impossible. views normative by reinforced and both stalemate, caused of decade a than more ensued Thus exist. could ground common no whom with enemy an as other the of perception normative a held side Each impossible. the on other, the on government Serbian the and hand, one on governmentAlbanian ethnic betweenKosovo’s cooperation meaningful and stalemate, the precipita ensured that system conflict the interrupted evolution normative 2011 pro norms adversarial of system a how demonstrates Kosovo of status the over counterparts Case The Design Research duced an extended stalemate between the sides. Moreover, an assessment of the EU’s the of assessment an Moreover, sides. the between stalemate extended an duced - 3 eito o te ofit uprs h cneto ta mediator that contention the supports conflict the of mediation 13 hs hss truh ogtdnl nlss f h EU the of analysis longitudinal through thesis, This 1998 war the With Albanian Kosovo their and officials Serbian between dispute the of review A ted unprecedented cooperation amongted unprecedented adversaries. : : The

Serbia

- Kosovo

built upon using indicators developed by Mandell and Tomlin. Tomlin. and Mandell by developed indicators using upon built - 99 war having left some 10,000 people dead, the prospect of prospect the dead, people 10,000 some left having war 99

Dispute

16 issue of Kosovo’s status was for many years many for was status Kosovo’s of issue

sds ht ae cooperation made that sides h

eaie om. h effort The norms. perative - eitd negotiations mediated - induced induced CEU eTD Collection Serbia the of history and nature the both assessing documents Brussels the and Center NGO from extracted primarily is Kosovo and DataSources upon EU mediators. system. Kosovo of status the on positions rigid maintaining still while agreements make to ability disputants’ the concessions. mutual made disputants phase. that for outcome negotiation the produced evolution) normative of absence the (or norms of negotiation. o indicators Tomlin’s and Mandell vi normative phase’s each explain to insufficient exa period time the during Agreement. Brussels the and interregnum, breakthrough, first the escalation, dispute agreements, was Agreement Brussels the Serbia Belgrade the when the 2011, March between of phases distinct five examine chapters following The aa eosrtn te vlto o sae coeaie om bten Serbi between norms cooperative shared of evolution the demonstrating Data place took that events of overview brief a with begin chapters empirical These Mediated negotiation Mediated

Reciprocity

Each closes of withanoverview chapter w ms b acutd o. E for. accounted be must ews

—

h contro the

s mea is - based International Crisis Group produced particularly useful useful particularly produced Group Crisis International based ie. hn ec epan ta rtoait theories rationalist that explains each Then, mined.

is observed in the disputants’ willingness to accept and relyand accept to disputants’willingnessthe observedin is es ta le a te er o te Serbia the of heart the at lies that versy ue b osrig h peec o das n hc the which in deals of presence the observing by sured ocue. n re, h pae ae ery technical early are: phases the order, In concluded. f

reciprocity, functional cooperation, cooperation, functional reciprocity, ucinl cooperation Functional outcome, and makes a case that the disputants’ disputants’ the that case a makes and outcome, - Pristina dialogue began, and April 2013, when 2013, April and began, dialogue Pristina 17 vents are then examined in detail against against detail in examined then are vents

and news reports. Belgrade’s New Policy Policy New Belgrade’s reports. news and how the mediator

is observed by looking at looking by observed is - Kosovo conflict, and on and conflict, Kosovo - induced evolution induced - - ooo conflict Kosovo ooo conflict Kosovo and mediated mediated

are a

CEU eTD Collection chapters to dispute Serbia the of history recent a explains chapter following the parties, disputing th by produced documents various from extracted been also has Data frequently. referenced International Adnkronos C Broadcasting British the by English into translated been have that reports news Kosovar language Belgrade the of meetings orporation’s European monitoring service. monitoring European orporation’s e EU. With norms now established as a critical factor that defines options available to available options defines that factor critical a as established now norms With

demonstrating

outlets like Britain’s like outlets explain

how adversarial norms created the stalemate between them. Emp them. between stalemate the created norms adversarial how

normative change during the Belgrade changenormative during the

- produced detailed reports about the negotiations, and is is and negotiations, the about reports detailed produced rsia ilge Nw rprs oe rm both from come reports News dialogue. Pristina

Guardian

and the and 18

Additionally, the Italian news o news Italian the Additionally,

New York Times, York New - Pristina dialoguePristina follow.

and from Serbian and Serbian from and rganization

- English Kosovo Kosovo irical irical

CEU eTD Collection http://wnd.infobasel 18, 2015, Press, 2000). 21 http://www.bbc.com/news/world 20 killed were world. the of rest the by ignored largely agitation peaceful of decade a nearly param Albanian ethnic an (KLA), forcesadrivenLiberation separatist uprising by theKosovo down Army toput inKosovo War An Inconclusive powerful theside enough toinduce w conditionality EU table, negotiating the to sides both brought EU the by strategy impossible. them between cooperation made entrenched status its ambiguous. left and administration international under Kosovo placed which Kosovo, 1998 C “Country News World Profile:Digest, Kosovo,”

hapter Tim Judah, Tim Judah, “Kosovo Profile - 9 a bten eba se Serbian between war 99 In March 1998, March In a to end inconclusive the in rooted was Kosovo and Serbia between stalemateThe

3: desra norms adversarial h floig hpe epan te aue f hs stalemate, this of nature the explains chapter following The

and Kosovo: WarKosovo: andRevenge Background to the Serbia to the Background oe hn 0 ecn o t of percent 90 than more – earning.com/recordurl.aspx?wid=10835&nid=477061&umbtype=0

Timeline,” Timeline,” advocacy by Kosovo’s Albanians for Kosovo’s independence, a a independence, Kosovo’s for Albanians Kosovo’s by advocacy

Yugoslav president Slobodan Slobodan president Yugoslav

betwe BBC News - europe curity forces and an ethnic Albanian insurgency in in insurgency Albanian ethnic an and forces curity s to agree on a normalization pact. normalization a s toagree on ltr group. ilitary en -

Serbia 18331273 (New H , November 11, , November 2014, accessedMay 1,2014, 19

Moreover, it argues that while a rationalist a while that argues it Moreover,

he ad ooa officials Kosovar and n

aven, CT; London: CT; aven, University Yale 20 InfobaseLearning, n.d. - province’s Albanian population population Albanian province’s Kosovo Dispute Kosovo .

The violent KLA uprising uprising KLA violent The

Milošević 21

oe hn 000 people 10,000 than More

ordered Serbian security Serbian ordered

o mn years many for Accessed May

arguing followed a s not not s were that that .

CEU eTD Collection http://wnd.infobaselearning.com/recordurl.aspx?wid=10835&nid=473139&umbtype=0 Force; Facts OtherFile, 10,1999,Accessed Developments,” June On “Yugoslavia Troop SignsWithdrawal AuthorizesK Kosovo Agreement...U.N. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kosovo/etc/cron.html 23 http://www.osce.org/odihr/17772?download=true (War theOSCE of KosovoFindings October Verification Mission, 1999 1998 to June and Human Rights, OrganizationInstitutions forand Security Cooperation Office Democratic inEurope for Thousands http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/kosovo/5084374/Kosovo province 22 the upon These institutions UNMIK. parallel of established establishment enclaves northern Kosovo’s in Serbs primarilybankIbar Kosovo, of onthe the northRiver found innorthern enclaves of handful a in clustered remained who Serbs 100,000 roughly The Albanians. fled minority Serb ethnic Koso of Most afterward. soon disarm to agreed KLA refugees. the Albanian pressure, NATO Kosovo Facing of return the supervise and peace maintain to KFOR as Kosovo in Mission the Administration of mandate the under falling protectorate international Council Security forces 1999. inJune 78 a before displaced

“A Frontline, Kosovo Chronology,” PBS, n.d.,Accessed 18,2015, May Neil Tweedie,“ saw: 1999) accessed Maysaw: 1999) accessed 1,2015, ut s ooo lain hd oe rvosy n n fot o eit eb rule, Serb resist to effort an in previously done had Albanians Kosovo as Just the Kosovo, of status the about confusion created that development a In ,” - Telegraph killed -

as Kosovo War: ThousandsWar: as killed SerbforcesKosovo control triedtokeep of n ue 99 asd eouin 24 which 1244, Resolution passed 1999 June in Kosovo/Kosova: As Seen, As Told: anAnalysis As ofthe HumanTold: Seen, Rights Kosovo/Kosova: As 22 - Serb , March 31, 2009, Accessed May , March 31,2009,Accessed 1,2015,

day NATO air campaign by forced the withdrawal of withdrawal the forced by campaign air NATO day

- for Serbia Serbia for forces

- tried

(UNMIK); it further it (UNMIK); in the wake of violent reprisals by returning Kosovo returning by reprisals violent of wake the in

- to Belgrade - keep 20

- control - akd ntttos included institutions backed .

- of

authorized a NATO force known known force NATO a authorized - province.ht Unite elrd ooo an Kosovo declared ml

May . Ntos Interim Nations d

. (see

18, 2015,

fig. 1) Milošević - osovo War

schools, . -

U.N. U.N. vo’s

’s

CEU eTD Collection df http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2011/package/ks_rapport_2011_en.p May 172015, 2011 ProgressBrussels, October Accessed 1207Final, Report,” 12, 2011. SEC(2011) 25 http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/europe/Kosovo%2031.pdf Report 131 No. International Group Crisis Retrieved 18May 2015from Wright, R Robert,“Rugova accessed May 18,2015, Law,of Human of Rights andRule 24 direct to impediment Serbia the of heart the at lay Kosovo northern integra historically a as Serbia in regarded widely region a Kosovo, in foothold a keep to order in structures parallel the maintain to determined officials Serbian and Kosovo; northern a Kosovar and Serbia between contention of point major a became Kosovo in structures parallel backed UNMIK. by accepted not were Serbs Kosovo to belonging w situations address to up sprang that forgery document of industry cottage a and rights; and property of administration the in complications systems; in These Belgrade to reported that another and 1244, Resolution jurisdiction. hospitals “Parallel October Structures inKosovo,” 2003,6

here UNMIK documents were not accepted in Serb enclaves, and Serbian documents documents Serbian and enclaves, Serb in accepted not were documents UNMIK here . European “Commission Staff Working Union:European Commission, Paper: Kosovo* Organization for Kosovo Security in Mission and inEurope Cooperation

l part of the country. The presence of the Belgrade the of presence The country. the of part l h eitne f w sprt st o infrastructure of sets separate two of existence The clude cut, n scrt fre, l o wih prtd usd UNMIK outside operated which of all forces, security and courts, , 24

, among other issues, the potential for double jeopardy under dual court court dual under jeopardy double for potential the issues, other among , uthorities, with Kosovar officials angry that they had no authority in in authority no had they that angry officials Kosovar with uthorities, ( Pristina/Belgrade/Brussels: June 3,2002)Pristina/Belgrade/Brussels: accessed June 2015, May 1, Serbian and Kosovar http://www.osce.org/kosovo/42584?download=true

, UNMIK’s Tackling Albatross: Div eturns toHero’s W http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic

Parallel Structures inKosovo Parallel Structures

integration into theEU. into integration 21 -

elcome Kosovo stalemate, and stalemate, Kosovo - 7.

,” — Financial Times gave rise to practical problems. problems. practical to rise gave - backed parallel institutions in institutions parallel backed ision inMitrovica, Balkansision —

25 the one that operated under under operated that one

, h ex The

October 2003,6

allocation of property property of allocation .

came to represent a a represent to came , 16July 1999. sec o Serb of istence , Department .

- 7, - CEU eTD Collection http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Europe, 2006,accessed 27July May 182015, Produce“Vienna Kosovo NoResult on Talks 27 http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Financial Times Settlement,GreaPolitical Stefan Wagstyl, DueVienna “Talks toStartin Today Way ClearFinal Could the to a http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Financial Times, “Kosovo Endgame: Meeting Vienna Pave Must Final Way Settlement T to october/e1014a.htm October 200 26 officials insistingthey independenc out ruling Serbian officials with concluded it one; previous the than warmer no was and 2005 and 2004 violent of number a followed Kosovo, of status the address prime Kosovo and Sejdiu Boris themselves tospeak toeach other.” table. the to sides two the bring to wrangling diplomatic of weeks after only came OSCE, the summit The year. previous the m place took

inister “Kosovo Profile “First talks direct betweenBelgradeand held Vienna,” Pristina Update, in 15 NATO Tadić Živković A second summit second A officials Kosovar and Serbian between negotiations failed of series a in first The Failed Negotiat Zoran in October in

3, Accessed 18 May 3, Accessed 2015, and Živković

, October 14, , October 2013. Accessed May18, 2015, Serbian prime m prime Serbian

and Rugova, according to the the to according Rugova, and 15 O – .

Timeline,” BBC Timeline,”

ctober18, 2015, 2003,Accessed May would acceptwould 2003, with a one a with 2003, ions Precede Independence Declaration Independence Precede ions , and ,

ter Foreign Investmentter Foreign andEventual EU M

in Vienna took place took Vienna in m inister

Ibrahim — inister Vojislav Vojislav inister e but offering Kosovo broad autonomy, and Kosovar Kosovar and autonomy, broad Kosovo offering but e high by attended

26 Agim independence

News. Rugova, who h who Rugova, http://www.nato.int/docu/update/2003/10 - time mee time Çeku 22

–

. SerbianBBC Agency,” Monitoring

in July in . . . The U.N. The Koštunica

- Financ

ting in Vienna between Serbian prime prime Serbian between Vienna in ting ranking officials from the EU, NATO, NATO, EU, the from officials ranking and nothing less ad been elected Kosovo’s president president Kosovo’s elected been ad

2006, between 2006, a Times ial - mediated summit, designed to designed summit, mediated , and Kosovo p Kosovo and , clashes “ol brl bring barely “could , . 27 embership

in Kosovo during during Kosovo in Serbian p Serbian re alks sident Fatmir Fatmir sident ,” ,” - resident resident CEU eTD Collection Self 31 http://wnd.infobaselearning.com/recordurl.aspx?wid=10835&nid=256993&umbtype=0 accessed May 19,2015, 30 Between Kosovoand Serbia,” 29 2007, accessed2015 from May 19, NeverKosovars, Will Agree Serbian Government onRule,” 28 declaration and blockKosovo’stovariousbodies. soughtto accession international independence Kosovo’s of legality the dispute to continued time same the at EULEX,but is key on Serbian EU The the with issues. worked separate government as status Kosovo’s of issue the and process accession EU the with dealing of policy a adopted subsequently and 2008, April in EU the with Kosovo tothe EUU.N. from the over authority international of transfer the of start the marking officials, customs and declared police, judges, including servants civil of thousands 2008 in Kosovo to deployed mission unilaterally Kosovo opposition, Serbian 2008. vehement 17, February on independence of face the in and sovereignty. of question basic the on yield to willing was Kosovo “i that Moon Ki Ban General Secretary U.N. told and dead negotiations the declared Ahtisaari hea when 2007, March through sporadically continued Kosovo

“Kosovo: Adam Beha, Over “Disputes the 15 Lynch,Colum “U.N Leon Todoricand Vladimir Malazogu - Interest Required ndependence is the only option for a politically stable and economically viable viable economically and stable politically a for option only the is ndependence Serbia, in the meantime, signe meantime, the in Serbia, U.N. .” 28

Ban announced later that the mediation effort had e effort had Ban laterthe mediation that announced - EU Rule of Law Deployed,EU of Rule Mission eitd ak bten eba ad ooa dlgtos n h sau of status the on delegations Kosovar and Serbian between talks mediated ,

. Mediator Calls for Kosovo Independence; for Calls Says. Mediator Kosovo Chief Negotiator report preparedreport Policy New on Ethnic for the Center Project

Nationalities Papers Nationalities 30

http://www.lex 29 - d a Stabilization and Association Agreement (SAA) Agreement Association and Stabilization a d Point Agreement on Normalization of onNormalization Relations Agreement Point

The new European Union Rule Rule Union European new The , Belgrade 23 sues, notably recognizing the authority of of authority the recognizing notably sues,

” Facts OnFi Facts isnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic -

Pristina Dialogue: Transformation Pristina of 43, no.1(January 102 2015): ” With broad Western backing, backing, Western broad With ” Washington Post, le nded because “n because nded , December11, 2008. d U.N. mediator Martti Martti mediator U.N. d of Law (EULEX) Law of

March 21, either side either - 121. 31 .

CEU eTD Collection accessed May 19,2015, 34 Required, 33 http://wnd.infobaselearning.com/recordurl.aspx?wid=10835&nid=267194&umbtype=0 2010, accessed2015, May 10, 32 http://www.cnp.rs/resources/files/dialogue_bg_pr.pdf Relations Kosovo(Pristina/Belgrade:2011) accessed November May 5,2015, and stabilization a on negotiations opening of possibility the While difficult. side EU of development the made Kosovo recognize to states member EU five of reluctance The vulnerable. politically was it when time a at table the to Kosovo bring to ploy a perceived reportedly officials Kosovar dialogue, the up set to coali weak a with it left had election 2010 the EU, EU brought Serbia to “ Kosovo and Serbia between dialogue a propose to motion U.N. its modified Serbia pressure, EU This bid. EU its from effort. separate was policy Kosovo its that the continued it if blocked be developm would EU the into Serbia integrate to moves preliminary further that officials Serbian informed who officials, EU powerful U.N. law. international violated not had it that decided 2010 July in 10 a in which (ICJ), Justice of Court International the from declaration Poi Turning Serbia’s and Decision The ICJ

MacDonald, and “Serbia KosovoHold Neil, Talks,” Malazogu and Todoric, “International News:

resolution seeking to water down the ICJ opinion. The move outraged a number of of number a outraged move The opinion. ICJ the down water to seeking resolution The Kosovar side was initially reluctant to join the dialogue. A messy, fraudulent fraudulent messy, A dialogue. the join to reluctant initially was side Kosovar The Kosovo’s on opinion nonbinding a requested Serbia 2008, September In to improve people’s lives.” The move, combined with continued pressure from from pressure continued with combined move, The lives.” people’s improve to ” ent marked a turning point for Serbia, which was now precluded from arguing from precluded now was which Serbia, for point turning a marked ent

8 - 9.

Kosovo IndependenceLegal, Kosovo Ruled http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic

“ Belgrade - mediated negotiations. - Pristina Dialogue:Pristina of Self Transformation tion government; as government; tion 24 nt

34 .

Having come under considerable under come Having inancial Times carrots to pull in the Kosovar the in pull to carrots ” Facts OnFile Facts Tadić 32

Serbia then proposed a proposed then Serbia

and Ashton worked Ashton and , March 9,2011, - 4 decision issued issued decision 4 .

, July, 22, - Interest .

CEU eTD Collection Required, 37 http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Monitoring Europe,9,2011, a March 36 Required, Malazogu and Todoric, and Mayfrom 21,2015 the Pr 35 authorities inPristina “ and dismantled, were Kosovo north in structures parallel that ensure criteria: two meet instead to had It Kosovo. recognize to having without process ofway status. regardless question ofthe an interest fo in fores she that added She discuss.” “t that opened newspaper Serbian the told Ashton agenda. the on to resolution permanent a of achievement directly failure talks’ the linked had Ban which to issue join. succeede finally liberalization visa eventual of offer additional an start, the from table the on been had EU the with agreement association

Malazogu and Todoric, “EU’ Mjekiji,“ Shqipe - eu 35 ess: Londoness: ofEconomics accessed and School Science,April Political 17,2013,

Crucially, the EU also indicated that Serbia could continue on wi on continue could Serbia that indicated also EU the Crucially, issue status the to resolution binding a on emphasis U.N.’s the to contrast In s A integration/ ” ”

shton saysshton Kosovo 9. 9.

here is no point broaching topics that one of the pa the of one that topics broaching point no is here r the sake oftheir sake thatSerbia owncouldr the peoples,”and and“f Kosovo . Kosovo http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/eurocrisispress/2013/04/17/kos

. 37

“

Belgrade “ - Belgrade Serbia talksand EU integration -

Serbia Talksfor P Region’s ‘Essential’ EU - aw negotiations on “ on negotiations aw Pristina Dialogue: Transformation of Dialogue: Self Pristina - Pristina Dialogue:Pristina of Self Transformation ccessed19, 2015, May ” 36

the question of Kosovo’s status would not be not would status Kosovo’s of question the 25

Politika Politika d in convincing Kosovar officials to to officials Kosovar convincing in d many topics that both parties have parties both that topics many — ,” Economics Euro Crisis in Crisis ,” Euro Economics the EU had indicated that the that indicated had EU the two days before the dialogue the before days two normalize” relations with relations normalize” rties is not willing to willing not is rties ovo rospects th the accession the th - - serbia Interest - Interest ,” BBC,” - talks ind a a ind — an an - CEU eTD Collection http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/?fa=54403 February May 2,2014,accessed 28,2015, 38 Koso and Serbia brought that werebettthey decidedthat each side which in calculations, Thaçi minister prime Serbian Indeed, each. for integration EU with linked directly not were them between relations of normalization at theirposition expense. zero a as negotiations the pro appear [and] things right the say to Serbia and Kosovo “induced having as dialogue the of stages early described Center Policy e been never had trust Mutual livelihoods. countless of destruction large deaths, war 10,000 than more of by memories recent colored was other the of perception side’s Each down. sat they once negotiations carrot applied. was liberalization visa the Kosovo, For membership. of prospect the with table negotiating leveraged successfully EU the Serbia, For cond sticks. and carrots of use the through priorities disputants’ the rearranging of strategy rationalist a through table negotiating the Table tothe Parties Bringing

Judy “How Dempsey, the itionality to get Serbia to drop efforts to dispute the ICJ opinion, and drew it to the to it drew and opinion, ICJ the dispute to efforts drop to Serbia get to itionality

have both affirmed that this was the case. the was this that affirmed both have Insum, partici to sides the induce to enough not was effort this Yet EU The , in its capacity as a mediator, drew both the Serbian and Kosovar sides to sides Kosovar and Serbian the both drew mediator, a as capacity its in , Serbia and Kosovo would never have agreed to any mediation effort if theif effort anymediation to neveragreedhave would Kosovo andSerbia

- sum game in which cooperation streng cooperation which in game sum

EU brought Serbia and Kosovo toadeal,”EUand brought Serbia Carnegie Europe, vo to the negotiating table in Brussels. in table negotiating the to vo

Ivica 26 Dačić

- dialogue,” but in which both sides viewed sides both which in but dialogue,” 38

It was undeniably parallel cost parallel undeniably was It

. n Ksv pie iitr Hashim minister prime Kosovo and

- scale forced migration, and the and migration, forced scale er with the EU than without it, than without EU the with er thened the opponent’s the thened

stablished. The New New The stablished. Yet, their normative their Yet, ae n good in pate - benefit - faith faith CEU eTD Collection relations. set to which upon Belgrade the of start the at intact was 1999 in began that stalemate the and cooperation, prohibited still views

tle the political matters of the parallel institutions, or normalization of normalization or institutions, parallel the of matters political the tle - rsiadaou n ac 01 hr a nt e a foundation a yet not was There 2011. March in dialogue Pristina

CEU eTD Collection 2015, AlbaniansMay and BBCFebruary Serbs News, inKosovo,” 17,2008,accessed 29, 39 Fig of ethnic distribution Albanians inKosovo 1:The and Serbs

Organization for Securityand Coop http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7249034.stm

eration (OSCE), inEurope “Distribution of ethnic 28

, 2008 . 39

CEU eTD Collection EU alter approach would tomediation disputants’ rearrange have would were membership EU of pull the rational not was it However, t with off better were they that calculation rationalist a of result events be the to essential th and deal, the permitted Kosovo and Serbia between norms adversarial techni issues thatwere impeding a with emerged delegations Kosovar and Serbian between there held were days, two or one over of negotiations of round first the approached Chapter longtime EU diplomat Robert Cooper Robert diplomat EU longtime plcns dp teE’ rfre oiin “ positions preferred EU’s the adopt applicants

potential members’ cost members’ potential a agreement cal In a working paper working a In the as table negotiating the to drawn were governments Kosovo’s and Serbia Agreements? Technical the Early Prompted What I chapter, this In Serbian that culture adversarial this within was It tween March 8, 2011,and demonstrate July Marchtween 8, 4,2011,to

4: en tuk sooner struck been Early Early process were s Technical Agreements Technical cost

first explain why rationalist theories theories rationalist why explain first f omtv transformation normative of

the normalization of relations. the normalization

arguing that arguing - eei cluain b applying by calculations benefit achieved. - - have been drasticallydifferent. choice calculations that produced the July 4 agreement. 4 July the produced that calculations choice benefit calculations, benefit .

oevr i Moreover, solely I then propose that a gradual transformation of of transformation gradual a that propose then I

t responsible, the responsible, . he power of EU conditionality can conditionality EU of power he Five rounds of talks, each of which took place took which of each talks, of rounds Five

on March 8, 2011 8, March on 29 Coe’ role Cooper’s f

ac 8 and 8 March

Moravcsik and Vachudo and Moravcsik el ht addressed that deal because the basic benefit offered to offered benefit basic the because

The subsequent section surveys surveys section subsequent The n the n

, held in held ,

s mdao hd en to been had mediator a as early technical agreements agreements technical early and Kosovar delegations delegations Kosovar and cannot

this claim.this art ad tcs his sticks, and carrots July he EU than without it. without than EU he

4 the Brussels office office Brussels the explain how the how explain

2011 , eea technical several at Cooper was was Cooper at

va claim va dramatically , when

that the the se If

CEU eTD Collection KissingerEast,” 43 inthe Middle 41 10. 40 4 July agreements first the of conclusion possible. decayed simultaneously norms adversarial cooperation functional see would perceptions stick incentives,Cooper didnotemploy because them. Coop from penalties or sweeteners cooperate to incentive the case; the threats and offers In sticks. and carrots of application deal 4 July because produced immediately favor calculation wou EU Kosovo and extended, Serbia between powerful, that were conditionality EU if Yet outweigh them

Mandell and Tomlin, Moravcsik

— n xlnto prioritizing explanation An assume Letus me

it took it 41

the costs the much mbership

, A —

Cooper prodded the sides into making technical agreements through the the through agreements technical making into sides the prodded Cooper an

or at least very quickly very least at or uvy f vns ewe te tr o ngtain Mrh a 8 March negotiations of start the between events of survey five n d Vachudova, faster. n te Us terms EU’s the ing to cooperation on basic technical agreements. This, however, was not was however, This, agreements. technical basic on cooperation to — — that applicants make concessions when no coercion is threatened.” is coercion no when concessions make applicants that egotiation rounds beforeegotiation , then, that then, , s f uh ra value. great such of is

The July 4 agreement cannot be the be cannot agreement 4 July The or ,

“Mediation in the Developm in “Mediation

evidence eitd negotiation mediated

“ National Interests, Power, EnlargementNational and State EU because - 55. d o hv be ncsay A osdd cost lopsided A necessary. been have not ld er — ugsig ht new, that suggesting .

future hs case, this — The deal cannot have been the result of carrot of result the been have cannot deal The the ol hv bcm apparent become have would and

conditionality alone was insufficientwas alone conditionality demonstrates that this was indeed the case, and and case, the indeed was this that demonstrates seta rl o te iptns normative disputants’ the of role essential to the extent that basic technical deals became deals technical basic that extent the to 30 EU integration EU basic basic

”

the sides the

hy add They we

technical agreements would have been have would agreements technical

ee einn t eeg, n that and emerge, to beginning were ol epc t se Cooper see to expect would ent ofNorms toManage Conflict:

came

shared norms of of norms shared that that —

product of EU conditionality conditionality EU of product

together. remained the same the remained ebrhp benefits membership - eitd negotiations mediated

o h disputants the to

re to close the close to ciprocity , without ,

- linking benefit d the nd - .” and

“ so 40 - ,

CEU eTD Collection officials However, agreements. part, its for reflecting our and independence our “[strengthening] to amounted Tahiri Edita negotiator, atte to Cooper with agreed had because flimsy, was matter that on them between “cooperation” Even will a was sides the between existed that ground Round One prevented. previously had sides the between animosity deep that agreements technical modest of set a for allowed year that of July by which norms, cooperative of establishment incremental meeti five first the of mediation Cooper’s However, Belgrade the of start the at norms cooperative shared no The Belgrade normative new a of creation the environment to essential was effort mediation Cooper’s that fe te ls o te fir the of close the After with sides the left Kosovo and Serbia between antagonism and mistrust of Years ; instead, Ser instead, ; a disinterest disinterest a

that permitted theearly agreements. technical niae a enes o nae ih h Ksvr ie n technical on side Kosovar the with engage to keenness a indicated - Pristin bian negotiators were transparent in their desire to desire their in transparent were negotiators bian a dialogue:a in engaging with her Serbian counterparts. Serbian her with engaging in this position came not fro not came position this ,

March 9 remarked remarked 9 March nd the meetings, the nd t on o talks of round st

March 8 8 March 31 – ht her that

July 4, 2011 July and and m any desire to work alongside work to desire any m ingness to attend mediated negotiations mediated attend to ingness

n ac 9 2011 9, March on not with one another. one with not delegation’s goals at the dialogue dialogue the at goals delegation’s g ewe te rsle i the in resulted them between ng -

Pristina dialogue in March 2011. March in dialogue Pristina relations with the U.S. and EU, and U.S. the with relations

The Serbian delegationSerbian The , the only common common only the , Serbia and Kosovo and Serbia strike technical strike Kosovo’s lead lead Kosovo’s

Kosovar Kosovar ” , .

CEU eTD Collection 44 accessed May 21,2015, “ MacDonald, “ Neil, 25, 2011,accessedfrom 21May 43 Requir Malazogu and Todoric 27, 2011,accessed21, 2015, May 42 set oftechnical agreements meetings. on accords outlining 17 May and Fifth The cooperativewindows. negotiation mediated c dispute; position. national Kosovo to desire a indicated part, his for that declared neither that indicating statements on Kosovo’s status anddeals Kosovo, with Serbia and Kosovo meet in BrusselsSerbia in meet and for Kosovo EU

MacDonal Valmir Klaiqi, “Final Preparations,” “Negotiations start to inBrussels,” ed, Three Borislav negotiator lead Serbian and Tahiri

n eaf f h pol wo ie there live who people the of behalf on -

” learly, RoundBreakthrough T

12. he fifth round of round fifth he - d, Neil, “Serbia and “Serbia Kosovo holdtalks.”d, Neil, 18

inconclusive atr o Kosovo’ of matters

there existed there In ”

. 44 42 Serbia andSerbia Kosovoholdtalks.” early June 2011, Cooper 2011, June early

, which Mandell and Tomlin argue are necessary for the opening of of opening the for necessary are argue Tomlin and Mandell which ,

ah ie ulcy hrceie te ak i trs f h status the of terms in talks the characterized publicly side Each

hnfl f ehia issu technical of handful a , “

then to then http://www.bbc.com/news/world

Belgrade . negotiation rounds negotiation

the Belgrade the

no shared no

use them as a stepping as a use them http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic “start re “start

- s http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic would Pristina Dialogue: Transformation of Dialogue: Self Pristina

oeegt wr “reoal sett “irrevocably were sovereignty Danas, Express

norms of norms solving the many piled many the solving budge on the matter of Kosovo’s of matter the on budge - Pristina dialogue Pristina 32

- circulate trans backed talks backed

were , trans. BBC, trans. February Europe, Monitoring .

es reciprocity ,” BBC Monit held in Brussels in held

Stefanović d - that had been been had that ihu “ without stone to

among the delegations delegations the among - ,” BBCMarch News, 8,2011, europe , held July 4, July held , , oring Europe open open functional cooperation functional

iig p u [Serbian] our up giving - fe the after - up problems we have in have we problems up 12672846 political negotiations March 28, A 28, March discussed led

p . meeting ” roduced . 43 ,

- status. Tahiri status.

Interest February

Stefanović

a proposal proposal a in earlier earlier in . pril 15, pril

. issued

first first , or , ,

CEU eTD Collection wants July 4,2011,accessedMay 23,2015, 46 2013): 4, New Policy Center, Deda,Ilir,and Qosaj Implementationthe oftheBetween Technical 2/13,” Agreements Kosovoand Serbia, 45 Kosovo of recognition Serbian issues important resolving EU.” the basi good o all principle “in accepted delegation specifics. offer not did but agreement the said meetings. Kosovo. in universities provision agreed sides the Finally, Kosovo authorities Kosovar Kosovar issued insurance automobile

George “ Jahn, InstituteKosovo Policy (KIPRED),Development for and Research “The Analysis of - kosovo In an interview with the Associat the with interview an In plates, license cards, identification accept to agreed Serbia deal, the Under officials officials

Stefanović ouet fe mvmn it Serbia into movement free documents 45 accessed 2015, May 6, s to ensure a lasting agreement lasting a ensure to s a ciia for critical was

- pr ogress AP Interview: Se AP needed in order to conclude a visa liberalization agreement with the EU. EU. the with agreement liberalization visa a conclude to order in needed was , in the deal’s wake, deal’sthe in , (IsWay There) Serbia Kosovo? for and AForward - n t EULEX to and Mustafa, Ariana,(J Mustafa, Prishtina: -

193611589.html

reached after the Kosovar side had “moderated their demands,” their “moderated had side Kosovar the after reached

Most Most eonz diploma recognize

.” ethnic

46 Stefanović y ooa isiuin, effectively institutions, Kosovar by , while Tahiri characterized the deal the characterized Tahiri while , eal o te el’ mlmnain ee et o future to left were implementation deals’ the of details

Tahiri http://www.cnp.rs/en/articles/view/94 rb diplomat wants Kosovoprogress lain from Albanians fiil ois f ii rgsr books registry civil of copies official http://news.yahoo.com/ap f the f od h Pristina the told . called the accords “ accords calledthe

” ed Press, Serbia Press, ed

lo ttd that stated also

that would “take Kosovo and Serbia closer to to closer Serbia and Kosovo “take would that 33 proposals Cooper presented” Cooper proposals ise by issued s

. Serbia also agreed to provide provide to agreed also Serbia une 2013): 5.

oten Serbia southern

- n ah te’ universities other’s each ae daily based

accords foreign minister Vuk minister foreign a major positive step towards towards step positive major a -

interview i nt mut o a to amount not did

as a sign that Serbia Serbia that sign a as allowing

,” Associated,” Press, . h had who

(Belgrade: March Express - calling them “a “a them calling serb — documents - holders of of holders diplomat

attended ht her that Jeremić Jeremić both .

That and and to -

CEU eTD Collection reach 2011, accessed201 May 23, Lawrence Serbia, “Kosovo, ReachBreakthroughInsight, Marzouk, Balkan July Deal,” 4, 2011. Accessed2015, May 23, Valmir Klaiqi, “Here istheAgreement,” May 23,2015, “ http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic/ 47 within reached be can agreements that disputants that had notbeen before possible thesides met u “moderated” side Kosovo the word. their keeping of capable future the in fulfillment of norm a of establishment early the reflects and sides, two the between exchange mutual first the marked diplomas cooperative begantoreplace norms them. that Kosovo and Serbia agreements first N signalancan the beginningsexpectationachieved of that deals beat the negotiating table. in reflected n characterizedthe still declaration. independence Kosovo’s of recognition toward moving was Kosovo, Serbia agree on issues toeaseKosovo, Serbia on agree ormative Evolutionormative

“ConflictingInterpretations.” - breakthrough Begin university another’s one recognizing begin to pledge Kosovo’s and Serbia Events the public remarks issued after the fifth round, in which the sides begin to begin sides the which in round, fifth the after issued remarks public the n ns f nr of norm a of ings

http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic between the start of start the between July 4 July - deal

egotiations in terms of the status dispute, a slight change in tone is tone in change slighta dispute, status the of terms in egotiations

had prevented previous prevented had would . elc the reflect

5, reciproci

http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/kosovo demonstrate to both Serbia and Kosovo and Serbia both to demonstrate http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic

nspecified demands also suggests a degree of reciprocity reciprocity of degree a suggests also demands nspecified Danas Jeremic’s assertion that Serbia’s concessions came after came concessions Serbia’s that assertion Jeremic’s roots mediated ucinl c functional ty. , Julyaccessed May 7,2011, 28,2015,

strain

While not immediately implemented, the implemented, immediately not While Express

of a process a of 34 ,” Associated2011, accessed,” Press, 3July

talks in Cooper’s office in

cooperation bega cooperation ,

. ooperation

an adversarial relationship adversarial an trans. BBCEurope, Monitoring Jul

on March 8 March on where — adversarial norms between norms adversarial r n cetne y the by acceptance an or

. and the concl the and

n to n

in Brussels. de that the other was was other the that 47 cay, and in which in and cay,

While the sides the While —

usion of the of usion are - serbia .

evident evident

deal’s deal’s y 1, -

CEU eTD Collection http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2011&mm=07&dd=14&nav_id=75433 May 23,2015, 48 July in later begin to set round, sixth the of ahead wide remained sides the between chasm founda which to enough significant these While normati adversarialdecayof ones. simultaneous the and Kosovo, and Serbia between norms cooperative of establishment Kosovo and Serbia tal mediated July, by to beginning, openness expressed had side Serbian the While round. trust shared Moreover, faith. good in it consider to Cooper for respect enough had side each that suggests deal 4 July the proposal June Cooper’s of consideration disputants’ negotiation status Kosovo’s agree reach to ability side’s each in

“ Team chief, EU official discuss next Kosovoround Team discuss next EU official chief,

2011

had not been visible previously.had notbeen visible tion The conclusion The Thus, five rounds ofEU . 48

— to build upon build to

disputants in statements to the media the to statements in as Tahiri was publicly praising publicly was Tahiri

a basis fora “b basis open a window to cooperation cooperation to window a open

of the early technical agreements agreements technical early the of ’

in future rounds of the Belgradethe of roundsfuture in cetne and acceptance

- mediated negotiations ringing Serbia andringing Serbia KosovocloserEU.” tothe in Cooper is more evident after the close of the f the of close the after evident more is Cooper in ments

eine n h mediator the on reliance while also maintaining a maintaining also while 35 .

Finally, beginnings of a norm of norm a of beginnings Finally,

ve transformations were modest, they werewere modest, transformations ve a deal Cooper had negotiated negotiated had Cooper deal a ; that the proposal was the basis of basis the was proposal the that ; ,” the on allowed allowed Beta - also Pristina dialogue. However,dialogue. Pristina , JulyRetr 14,2011.

early technical agreements technical early created a created for the gradual visible for and the — hard is reflected in the the in reflected is small - line position position line ks from the the from ks cooperative

mediated mediated

between ieved ifth the on . ,

CEU eTD Collection stalemates. break can conditionality EU that idea r a adopted Cooper because escalated Kosovo Moravcsik checkpoints customs the movementa andserved symbolic as local reminder for peopleongoing ofthe dispute. Serbs near lived who Serbs Kosovo and officers two seize to the of postponement meeting the announced issue, trade the on impasse an sensing Cooper, declaration independence goods Kosovar on embargo trade was on and on cooperate to willing included agenda the on 2011 20, July on Brussels in office Cooper’s in talks of round sixth the to return 5 Chapter

open.

the rce briae otie f eea o te checkpoints the of several of outside barricades erected

In this chapter, Iwill chapter, In this announced, was delay the after immediately Almost ha in agreements modest of slate a With deals to normalize communications infrastructure. communications normalize to deals

thorny issue of free trade free of issue thorny to September. His announcement came announcement His September. to

utm pos customs an : d Vachudova Vachudova d Dispute Escalation Dispute

s in ts —

ones demonstrates that EU conditionality is not as powerful a force as as forcepowerfula as not conditionalityEU is that demonstrates ,

uh s n creating on as such and had resulted in an alarming trade imbalance for Kosovo. Kosovo. for imbalance trade alarming an in resulted had and suggest.

first arguethat first northern that Serbian and Kosovar officials had indicated they were they indicated had officials Kosovar and Serbian that , a topic that required that topic a , I will then argue that argue then will I

ht wa that Kosovo

by 36 the impa the . s

ationalist mediation strategy mediation ationalist stig off setting , logistical frameworks for for frameworks logistical In th In

hours hours enacted

A section surveying events in July2011 in events surveying section A nd, e aftermath of the violence, Kosovo violence, the of aftermath e sse Stefanović before the sixth round sixth the before

between Serbia and Kosovo Kosovo and between Serbia the parties to address a Serbian Serbian a address to parties the in the aftermath of the 2008 2008 the of aftermath the in the conflict between Serbia and and Serbia between conflict the

However, also on the agenda the on also However,

iln cahs between clashes violent Kosov

ht oh mee free impeded both that n Thr wr st to set were Tahiri and ar police police ar previous

rooted in in rooted attempt had been set set been had . Issues .

deals ed over

the the the

to to ,

CEU eTD Collection acti 2011 July in Kosovo and Serbia between norms. cooperative of cost on Kosovo’s and Serbia change they to that so calculations Cooper by attempt an represented to directive EU an with meeting checkpoints customs the on deal the agreementearlier onthe matter process inthe negotiation a their aside set have i membership EU of draw sides two the between impasse an over Serbia andcaused Kosovo,and the argues the checkpoints on powerful

suddenly became visible suddenly became that Cooper’s strategy Cooper’s that However, the However, delayin of strategy Cooper’s Belgrade the of round 20 July the delay to decision Cooper’s Dispute Escalate? the Why did

was a stick, in effect, in stick, a was draw of draw

was the most beneficial most was the option. meeting’s postponement meeting’s EU EU vrail eainhp ad held and relationship, dversarial opr lce off blocked Cooper would return to talks in September with a view that that view a with September in talks to return would s not all not s membership drs te issue the address

interrupted the establishment of cooperative norms between norms cooperativeof establishment the interrupted , leading to with

- dispute to dispute n h asne f eitd talks mediated of absence the in g the meeting was rooted in the in rooted was meeting the g power which could convince the antagonistic sides antagonistic the convince could over customs checkpoints customs over ; subsequently, ;

ful. If it were, then Serbia and Kosovo would Kosovo and Serbia then were, it If ful.

the dispute’s escalation. the dispute’s Cooper 37

escalate.

h one the instead interrupted instead ol rsl i E disengagement EU in result would

demonstrate

avenue new, non new,

their noses noses their

d that

that a fa a that the -

cooperative courses of of courses cooperative

demonstrates erro allowed continued evolution continued .

o conclude to - The delay of the the of delay The neous notion that notion neous Pristina dialogue dialogue Pristina ilure to comply to ilure

cooperation coopera

to - t make a make hat the hat benefit benefit

some some tion tion I . t

CEU eTD Collection amounted 3 than o embargo border. agre negotiation. of norm developing a indicating Brussels, in solved be could matters the that issues of norm a reflect issues the approach to willingness public sides’ The concessions. agree Belgradeagree. could customs and energy, telecommunications, Thaçi newspaper Kosovar The telecommunication.” cadaster the of issues the reportedJ agreements further the of ahead just media of Interruption mn on ement et bten h sds ol poal ivle oe ere of degree some involve probably would sides the between ments

00 million euros’ worth of products annually. products of worth euros’ million 00 “ from the fundamental political dispute between them; it also suggests confidence suggests also it them; between dispute political fundamental the from spoke a spoke These cooperative norms were not not were norms cooperative These Any norms. cooperative shared of development a reflect statements These Stefanović After functional cooperation functional uly 14 that uly14 n Kosovar goods. In the meantime, it it meantime, the In goods. Kosovar n to

about 4 million euros per year, and and year, per euros million 4 about

bout the next meetingbetwe next the bout political Kosovo’s 2008 independence declaration, declaration, independence 2008 Kosovo’s the the Belgrade

and on on Stefanović ” certain y charged ly

Hashim planned

issues

in which they were capable of detaching certain technical certain detaching of capable were theywhich in cvl registry] [civil Pristina d Pristina said he and Tahiri “agreed that we should… we “agreedthat Tahiri and he said Thaçi

uy 20 July issu

migh , Kosovo’s prime minister, minister, prime Kosovo’s , o cnrl f utm pss near posts customs of control of e t ialogue: en the Kosova and Serbia teams,” saying “ saying teams,” Serbiaand Kosova the en meeting had had meeting 38 soon be achieved be soon yet el wr pit o wih [Pris which on points were seals

uiest dpoa, el diplomas, university , tog nuh hwvr t ahee any achieve to however, enough, strong Express had continued to export to Kosovo more Kosovo to export to continued had they

July 2011 July 2011 Kosovo’s exports to Serbia, in turn, turn, in Serbia, to exports Kosovo’s

arrived in arrived

niae some indicated had reported days earlier that that earlier days reported had eba ea enforcing began Serbia .

Serbia’s Beta news agency news Beta Serbia’s –

September 2011 September

Serbia via Serbia n ttmns o the to statements in

xetto that expectation crct and ectricity

try and solve solve and try

the Serbian Serbian the a developing developing reciprocal circuitous tina mediated

]

that and an

CEU eTD Collection International “ International 51 http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic trans. BBC Monitoring May Julyaccessed Europe, 23,2015, 20,2011, “ 23, 2015, International “ International 50 Required, Malazogu and Todoric, http://www.rferl.org/content/security_council_meeting_kosovo_urgen Violence “ 23, 2015, International 49 Cooper’s decision tocancel the meeting. side’s other the that claiming agreement “ said Cooper rec to tantamount was stamps the that claiming stamps, customs Kosovo’s of design the rejected had Serbia six the can abruptly Cooper Brussels, in arrived already having politically charged dispute institutions. manner: expensive and Kosovo: Talks with Serbia postponed, blame bothsides theKosovo: Talks Serbia other with roundofNext tal postponed, bothside Kosovo: Talks Serbia with EUUN For Calls Security Calm As Counci

“ “ “ Balkans: SerbianBalkans: tit Kosovobars goodsin SerbianBalkans: tit Kosovobars goodsin h etn to meeting th Hours before the before Hours ,” RFE/RL, July 27,2011,accessed23, 2015, ,” May RFE/RL, July ” http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic .

” 18. The 50 , dist. by, dist. McClatchy . . by, dist. McClatchy . Kosovo bars SerbianKosovo bars tit goodsin

t ae n sne o od meig nes e r al t rah an reach to able are we unless meeting a hold to sense no makes it oh t Both

discrepancy ks between deferred Kosovo,Serbia September until e eba ad ooa delegations Kosovar and Serbian he September.

“ e

Belgrade July 20 20 July ither via smuggling routes or by documents by or routes smuggling via ither . 49

had

refusal - - talks were set to open, and with the Kosovar delegation delegation Kosovar the with and open, to set were talks Tribune Business News,Business Julyaccessed May Tribune 20,2011. News,Business Julyaccessed MayTribune 21,2011, resulted i resulted - His Pristina Dialogue: Transformation of Dialogue: Self Pristina giig ooos indep Kosovo’s ognizing

decision

51 to

n a serious serious a n 39 opy with comply l Holds Emergencyl Holds OnKosovo Meeting - - -

for for for

was . s blame the other - - -

tat tradetat spat tradetat spat tradetat spat

rmtd by prompted trade imbalance for imbalance trade celed the session and postponed and session the celed

U rd rules trade EU . .

endence.

,” ,” ,” ,” ucl ise statements issued quickly Adnkronos Adnkronos Adnkronos Adnkronos ,” ,”

n mas i which in impasse an Adnkronos Adnkronos Adnkronos t/24279185.html ,” RTV Kosovo, ,” n ulc remarks, public In issued by parallel by issued

Kosovo had prompted prompted had recognition of of recognition - Interest , and a and , .

CEU eTD Collection Required, Malazogu and Todoric, 26, 2011,accessed24, 2015, May 53 “ International 52 http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Euro “ Bogdanović Goran T border the cross to traffic of control took KFOR structures. the for support tacit offering Belgrade firebombed angry clashwas with KosovoSerbs, ina killed were S 25, July measure “reciprocal” a was Pri repercussions immediate Dialogue’s ofthe Effects Postponement Serbian bu Serbian businessmen decry ban Kosovo's import rin odr i odr o noc te ban. the enforce to order in border, erbian hey also turned away turned alsohey

“ “ stina Kosovo policeby blocked conflict atnorthern locals border, looming SerbianBalkans: tit Kosovobars goodsin

pe, 24,2011.Retrieved July May 23,2015, operated by operated The move prompted a furious reaction in north Kosovo. One Kosovar policeman policeman Kosovar One Kosovo. north in reaction furious a prompted move The T

announced he Kosovar police police Kosovar ”

Ksv Srs ul svrl arcds o lc tafc wt ofcas in officials with traffic, block to barricades several built Serbs Kosovo . 19 sinessmen decry ban Kosovo's import . otoeet f h sxh etn between meeting sixth the of postponement

- 21.

Kosovo

a In response, response, In ban

from the crossingthe from both “

Belgrade attempted to attempted

in Kosovo in

Serbs.) , effectively enforc effectively , on the entry of Serbian goods into Kosovo into goods Serbian of entry the on

against the Serbian ban on Kosovar goods Kosovar on ban Serbian the against checkpoints 53 - http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Pristina Dialogue: Transformation of Dialogue: Self Pristina

eba ofcas rud ht ooos a hd the had ban Kosovo’s that argued officials Serbian

A day after day A seize two two seize

. KFOR subsequentl KFOR . Stefanović 40 -

ing Kosovar officials’ officials’ Kosovar ing

for Te EULEX (The and one ofthe and . -

,” ,” ,” customs posts in north Kosovo, on the on Kosovo, north in posts customs

tat tradetat spat Cooper’s announcement, Cooper’s Kosovar police retreated July 31 and and 31 July retreated police Kosovar Politika Politika

and the and . , trans. BBC Monitoring

- Serbian minister for Kosovo for minister Serbian diitrd utm posts customs administered Stefanović

y permitted y d ,” ,” isputed Adnkronos Adnkronos reciprocal , indicating that it it that indicating , . customs customs 52

,” July HINA,

and Tahiri Tahiri and

On On only passenger passenger only

authorities in authorities - Interest the night of night the posts posts embargo. embargo. .

was had ,

CEU eTD Collection 56 2015, 55 24, 2015, International “ http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Tensions 54 maintaining rigid desired certain achieve internalize to begin had parties the that suggests This concluded. openly had round Belgrade the of meeting sixth the when 2011, 20, July on case the not was on This matters. difficult cooperate”certain to parties the enable to sufficiently evolved not “had and disputants,” negoti earlier in fostered norms cooperative 13 a allowed Kissinger that argue they dispute, EvolutionNormative between Stefanović checkpoint dispute in thecustoms aftermath ofthe partition of Kosovo. in posts border the seize to moved had denied officials EU claim a EU, the of support effective Kosovo: NATO reopens borderKosovo: NATO officials crossings, reopens turned back Serb

Prelec,Meltdown.” Kosovo “North “ Judy and Dempsey NATO withKosovo Serbs inshootout http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic In Mandell and Tomlin’s case study on Kissinger’s mediation of the Israel the of mediation Kissinger’s on study case Tomlin’s and Mandell In S mall ,” http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic New York TimesNew York , dist. by, dist. McC - scale clashes between Kosovo Serbs and Albanians took place almost daily almost place took Albanians and Serbs Kosovo between clashes scale - rsia a set was Pristina

political

55 and Tahiri Brusselsand in indicated indicated

Neil MacFarquharNeil

outcomes

positions onthe statusofpositions Kosovo. latchy ,

Julyaccessed May 24,2015, 28,2011,

an - Tribune Business News, August 1, 2011, accessed News,Business August May 2011, 1, Tribune

o open. to y atcptn n technical in participating by xetto that expectation

, “ ,” .

Kosovo Firebombing New EthnicKosovo Underscores 56 h Srin n Ksvr s Kosovar and Serbian The 41 re t bok eba pas o te ethnic the for plans Serbian block to order ation rounds were not yet “internalized by the by yet“internalized not were rounds ation Australian

- , duringthelead month pause in negotiations because because negotiations in pause month

certain , July 29,2011,accessed .

. 54 .

Meanwhile,

technical deals would be be would deals technical

negotiations, even while while even negotiations, the idea that they could they that idea the - up to the up tothe ,” Adnkronos Adnkronos ides ahead of the the of ahead ides Thaçi next next

said police said May 24, meeting - Egypt CEU eTD Collection prompted also move government’s Kosovo The Serbs. Kosovo by operated force by actions of courses highlighted, antagonism of cause a and available longer no was cooperate backfired. move the However, positions. cooperative more adopt dra the that surmising evidently meeting, the postponing by the customs disputemight have been addressed. later deal a which upon foundation cooperative a strengthened have would deals of norm shared a of development credibility own accords his new to of contributed conclusion the overseen or with assisted Cooper They cooperationestablished, and had permitted been that deals customs on not if deals, previous of implementation likely ones. cooperative of establishment the and norms, adversarial of decay the was changed what cost rationalist cooperatio of expectations stated publicly new, these Moreover,

If the July 20 meeting gone forward as planned, planned, as forward gone meeting 20 July the If probably would have have would probably ece some reached The dispute between Serbia and Kosovo escalated in June 2011 because Cooper, because 2011 June in escalated Kosovo and Serbia between dispute The words, other In Such accords would have strengthened have would accords Such rslig n ilne and violence in resulting , - benefit calculations. The material costs and benefits remained the same; same; the remained benefits and costs material The calculations. benefit became technical

a visibl developing novd dge of degree a involved lce the blocked w of EU membership would convince the disputants to disputants the convince would membership EU of w e . mediated negotiation. mediated agreement

Kosovo’s government tried to se to tried government Kosovo’s

a takeover by KFOR of infrastructure previously previously infrastructure of KFOR by takeover a mn te disputants the among norm of of norm ongoing 42 s pras n eeomnctos r on or telecommunications on perhaps ,

the

ucinl cooperation functional functional cooperation functional cooperative salsmn o coeaie norms cooperative of establishment . A normative expectation for modest modest for expectation normative A .

The conclusion of such technical such of conclusion The tefanović

were previously impossible. were previously , thus strengthening the the strengthening thus ,

n had nothing to do with with do to nothing had n reciprocity

and Tahiri would Tahiri and Because the option to option the Because ize the customs posts customs the ize , it would have have would it ,

norm, at least. at norm, uncooperative uncooperative . Finally, had had Finally, . was

the erection the addressing evident ha

ve , .

CEU eTD Collection 58 57 escalation. de norm cooperative of interruption non undertake to side Kosovar the for feasible became suddenly it limited, cooperation for operations with norms; cooperative of development pos customs the address to Kosovo and woul there that signaling by cooperation force highest d ofviolence risk and “the presenting as summer the over escalation conflict’s the described 2011 September in agreements technical some of implementation the with roadblocks the of

Prelec, Kosov “North NewThere) Policy Serbia 8. A Way “(IsForwardfor and Center. Kosovo?” to attempted instead and 2011, July in norms of importance the neglected Cooper

— which, which, o Meltdown.” o

according eathBalkans have the Western since faced 2008.”

velopment resulted in the the in resulted velopment

to Belgrade’s New Policy Center, later interfered later Center, Policy New Belgrade’s to s su. h srtg itrutd h visible the interrupted strategy The issue. ts 43

d be consequences for a failure by Serbia Serbia by failure a for consequences be d . 57 - cooperative activities. Cooper’s activities. cooperative

The International Crisis Group Crisis International The Serbia - Kosovo Kosovo

58 dispute’s

CEU eTD Collection time a that meet major a make to Serbia concession. for feasible became it which by cooperation normative of a recall happened breakthrough the that instead argues then Belgrade early for set summit a at December. status candidacy EU Serbia grant to Council European deal latest the Serbia, to candidacy membership Kosovo customs of control to related problems resolve Kosovo and insignia Kosovar bear posts chec breakthrough Belg the of of round series a concluded Kosovo and consequentincreasingly Serbia reopened, avenues cooperative With 6 Chapter kpoints in northern Kosovo northern in kpoints an EU an ih h da o draw the With the Triggered What chapt This Belgrade the of round sixth The floig n coe rcmedto b te uoen omsin o grant to Commission European the by recommendation October an following ; shared history of cooperation, and built upon it to achieve an unprecedented rate unprecedented an achieve to it upon built and cooperation, of history shared - Pristina dialogue precipitated the breakthrough on the customs checkpoints. It checkpoints. customs the on breakthrough the precipitated dialogue Pristina

out would prompt the sides to reconsider their priorities. If this strategy had had strategy this If priorities. their reconsider to sides the prompt would out

priority of of priority : wherein The First First The er first rejects the notion that Cooper’s move t move Cooper’s that notion the rejects first rade

Serbia agreed to permit the presence of Kosovar police at customs at police Kosovar of presence the permit to agreed Serbia ial deals in dialogue rounds over the following weeks. The eighth The weeks. following the over rounds dialogue in deals ial resolving the custom the resolving E mmesi inadequat membership EU f - rsia ilge hl i ery December, early in held dialogue, Pristina Breakthrough . The . First First , and Kosovo agreed to drop demands that the customs the that demands drop to agreed Kosovo and , deal Breakthrough?

directly addressed Cooper’s insistence that Serbia Serbia that insistence Cooper’s addressed directly - rsia ilge eue i Spebr 2011. September in resumed dialogue Pristina 44 s

dispute

perd o la te a fr the for way the clear to appeared because the disputants were able to able were disputants the because t induce to e , Cooper Cooper ,

appears to have gambled have to appears hcpit i northern in checkpoints o impose a delay in the the in delay a impose o eba n Ksv to Kosovo and Serbia produced

a CEU eTD Collection https://www.consilium.europa. January 2012:4 59 independence. Kosovo’s recognized” fact in “has Serbia that media Kosovar way neutral status a in harmonized been now has insignia. documentation further contain not allowed would label compromise the that agreed side Kosovar the checkpoints the allow would that label customs Kosovar a on deal 2011, The Belgrade cooperatewas onthematter not posts. allowed that extent cooperativethe to evolved 2011, had norms December By issues. technical of number a on deals incremental EU the to returning upon Kosovo, and no pressure onKosovo meeting. the 9 December for theCouncil’sagendaEU integration on not was the timing meeting’s While either. agreement, December the for catalyst the not was meeting Council come have of mater the resolving deal a effective, been

European “ Council.

for the sixth round of the dialogue. Cooper managed to extract from them a them from extract to managed Cooper dialogue. the of round sixth the for eoe hn te omtv arena normative the then, Before With tensions high, tensions With be events of survey A :

right as the dialogue reopened reopened dialogue the as right the Serbian side agreed to honor labels labels honor to agreed side Serbian the - Pristina dialogue Pristina - 5. Accessed May5. Accessed 29,2015. likely Conclusions Conclusions to make a deal to contributed to a sense of urgenc of sense a to contributed Stefanović

Stefanović

tween September and December 201 December and September tween eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/126714.pdf available : September September :

–

9 December 2011 o eun o eba liig ht “ that claiming Serbia to return to ahead of

and Tahiri returned to Brussels to returned Tahiri and .

a be to desra, n te pin to option the and adversarial, too been had - 45 eitd negotiations, mediated

n September. in a breakthrough on control of the customs the of control on breakthrough a who controlled the customs posts would would posts customs the controlled who the C the –

December ouncil meeting. that read “Kosovo Custom “Kosovo read that ,” free y on the Serbian side, Kosovo’s Kosovo’s side, Serbian the on y EUCO 1. 25 139/1/11REV passage of goods through the the through goods of passage ,

The impending European European impending The 2011 1 suggest that Se that suggest 1

” n Thr t tell to Tahiri and ,”

continued to make make to continued

on September on 59

Stefanović T s,” herewas customs

modest

while

rbia rbia The The

2, 2,

CEU eTD Collection http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Union “ “Serbia talks boosting resume on and relations,”Associated Kosovo Press 62 http://www.lexisnexis.c bydist. McClatchy 61 http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic trans. BBC Monitoring accessed September Europe, from 7,2011, May 24,2015, “ NewThere) Policy Kosovo,”A Way “(IsForwardfor Center, 4. http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic BBC Moni “ Kosovo and 7. Serbia, 2/13,” 60 awa customs sides the However, involving registries. issues on civil stuck remained and deal recognition diploma on deals earlier mightagain once September checkpoint previous deals andfree on movement separa a concluded also Tahiriand Kosovo crossing opened; Move designed to help Serbia in its bid to join tojoin Serbia Movedesigned bid European inits Kosovo crossing tohelp opened; Serbian negotiator denies Kosovo, Serbiaremoving stamps, oncustoms deal reach trade barriers

NewThere) Policy Serbia 6. A Way “(IsForwardfor and Center. Kosovo?” “ KIPRED,Implementation“The ofthe theTechnical Analysis Between of Agreements Kosovo: Serbs resort to roadKosovo: Serbsresort again blocksas rise to tensions wt a rpsl ht ol se oh ooa ad eba fre working forces Serbian and Kosovar both see would that proposal a with y ,” The The

Gazette rsig, hc wr sil diitrd by administered still were which crossings,

wud e diitrd Wt te su unresolved, issue the With administered. be would s toring Europe, September 6,2011. Retrieved Maytoring Europe, 24, 2015, set up additional roadblocks in north Kosovo north in roadblocks additional up set seventh deals, (Montreal

try to seize try toseize

- oee, ald to failed however, Tribune Business 8,2011,accessedMayTribune September News, 24,2015, meeting om/hottopics/lnacademic

), K Decemberaccessed 26,2015, May 8,2011, ‘attribute sealosovo customs ofstate’,” constitutes Belgrade ,

ed oebr 21 November held te agreement that finalized some matters matters some finalized that agreement te telecommunications, energy, and the integration of of integration the and energy, telecommunications, civil registries. - supported supported drs te rcir su of issue trickier the address 46

. . . .

infrastructure - 22 60

KFOR rdcd oe eeomn of development some produced , reflecting ,” .

62 Adnkronos International Adnkronos in the region

opr et h parties the sent Cooper Kosovo concern concern ,” RTK, trans.,” RTK, o te customs the how .

Serbs left over from from over left .

61 that Pristina Pristina that

Politika

later in in later

at the the , ,

CEU eTD Collection http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Europe. accessed 5,2011, May December 29 2015. 66 http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Balkans,” 65 NewThere) Policy Serbia 5. A Way “(IsForwardfor and Center. Kosovo?” NATO soldiers w http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Novemberaccessed May 25,2011, 25,2015, “NATO Mayfrom 26,2015, International 64 2011, accessed2015, May 25, InternationalAdnkronos 63 an at stationed checkpoints display be would who “observers” crossing.” “administrative as officials such described sides north the in checkpoints customs the at work to officers customs and police Britain’s to described dialogue necessary status. towin candidate shor fallen had Serbia that remark to Merkel Angela Chancellor German incident the roadblocks; their of one dismantle to tried KFOR when erupted that Serbs Kosovo the that insistence Kosovo’s on checkpoints state display Kosovar insignia. stuck reportedly was matter the but checkpoints,

“ “ “ Ian Traynor,“Serbia’ Kosovo Kosovo: Serbsremoveba forKosovo: SlightSerbia, intalkswith border progress nosolution cro It w It o Meanwhile,

peacekeepers injured in clashes with local inclashes inKosovo Serbs peacekeepers injured ae as ha o te lne Erpa Cucl etn, and meeting, Council European planned the of ahead days came opened on November 30 November on opened Guardian - as in this fraught this in as Serbian border deal gets deal receptionsSerbian border mixed , dist. by, dist. McClatchy ounded bygunfireounded inKosovoclash , December 5, 2011. Accessed May, December 5,2011.Accessed 26,2015 Kosovar Kosovar http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnaca Nvme 2, 1 FR fies were officers KFOR 21 28, November n s road to EU may be blocked as toEUmayches road be blocked Guardian , dist. by, dist. McClatchy

rricades membershipponders bid as EU insignia environment that t that environment

http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic

h Ksvr ie aban side Kosovar The - 64 Tribune Business News, December 5, 2011, accessed News,Business 5,2011, December Tribune . s “p as

Amid discussions an unidentified an discussions Amid . 66

et afl” eba ged o emt Kosovar permit to agreed Serbia awful,” retty 63 47 -

Tribune Business 22, Tribune September News,

he eighth ro eighth he . . .

,” Reuters. .” RTK. trans. BBC Monitoring oe is ead ta the that demands its doned ckpoints return to the to ckpoints return und demic , of the Belgrade the of nue i a ls with clash a in injured ,” ,” . Irish Times Irish

Adnkronos Adnkronos senior ssings t of conditions of t

EU official official EU . Serb the ;

prompted prompted ,” - , Pristina CEU eTD Collection Internationa %20A%20Little%20Goodwill%20Could%20Go%20a%20Long%20Way.pdf d%20Serbia%20 http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/europe/balkans/kosovo/215%20Kosovo%20an Europe Report 215 International Group, Crisis Kosovo’s declare Brussels, 2,2011. December to continued 67 officials Kosovar and Kosovo, of recognition as even sides, the between deals consequential al norm this of development continued The movement a that thecu insistence its dropped return, in side, Kosovo The Kosovo. northern in officials customs its customs deals, with Reciprocal of norms developing in the of was that posts customs administration joint the on deal a for way the cleared ones adversarial certain EvolutionNormative integrated, single and secure Kosovo and Serbia which under “

Kosovo: Serbsremovebarricades membership ponders bid as EU “EU

most significant concession up to that point, permitting the presence of Kosovar Kosovar of presence the permitting point, that to up concession significant most - h csos el, s el s h dvlpet f rvos el o free on deals previous of development the as well as deals, customs The norms cooperative of evolution The framework a on agreed had sides the that announced EU the 2, December On facilitated dialogue: agreement on IBM,” agreementfacilitated dialogue: release, European press Council on stoms stamps andcheckpointsstoms insignia. Kosovar bear exchanges between the disputants are seen in the September and November November and September the in seen are disputants the between exchanges l nd civil registries, alsond civil registries, speak .

- , the Serbian side first agreeing to honorK first agreeing sidethe Serbian 11

- previously unavailable. previously 12

reciprocity , February May 7,2015, 2,2012,accessed Li Kosovo andSerbia: A

posts atposts a

, with EULEX assistance, EULEX with , , ucinl cooperation functional ll their common crossing theirll common points.

to a developing normofto adeveloping 48 between Serbia and Kosovo, and Serbia between

oe fr h cnlso o increasingly of conclusion the for lowed

This normative transformation normative This

ttle Goodwillttle Way. Go Could ALong eba ofcas anand non maintained officials Serbian

“will gradually set up the joint, joint, the up set gradually “will and , osovo’s stamps, and then, in and then,in osovo’s stamps,

functional cooperation functional ,” eitd negotiation. mediated Adnkronos Adnkronos ” 67 and the decay of of decay the and

is reflected is - .

CEU eTD Collection norms ledto checkpoints. customs the of operation on proposal sweeping Cooper’s modify, to together work and review, to willingness of norm evolving An independence. the

unprecedented

breakthrough on the customsissue. breakthrough onthe

oehr te otne dvlpet f these of development continued the Together, eitd negotiation mediated 49

s se is

n n h parties the in en joint joint ’

CEU eTD Collection breakthrough Serbian EUrepresenteda the candidacy failure thesignificance to recognize of moved quickly, poli foreign EU by but Cooper, by not mediated Ivica which in phase political Belgrade the of end gran UNMIK. by represented the at and meetings regional in participate to officials Kosovo expa final the be to was pause inthe Belgrade prompted a March Council European the Yet pr normalization the to commitment leaders’ Serbian meeting Council 9 December to importance significant attached had EU the 7 Chapter ted Serbia EU candidacy status at a March 1 summit. candidacyted Serbiasummit. EU statusata March 1 nsions to December’s accord on customs posts, and a separate accord that allowed that accord separate a and posts, customs on accord December’s to nsions Dačić This chapter argues chapter This the in resulted that Serbia in events of series a motion into set decision EU’s The Stefanović issue customs the on Kosovo and Serbia between breakthrough The

a furious reaction from reaction furiousa scheduled scheduled

n Ksvr rm mnse Hashim minister prime Kosovar and

: in the customs disp customs the in In ultimately terregnum

and Tahiri met in Cooper’s office in Brussels on February 22, for what for 22, February on Brussels in office Cooper’s in met Tahiri and round of technical talks technical of round - - eiin n wheth on decision Pristina dialogue’s technical phase, and the beginning of a new new a of beginning the and phase, technical dialogue’s Pristina Pristina dialogue.Pristina Stefanović

EU officials hailed the deal as a historic breakthrough, and and breakthrough, historic a as deal the hailed officials EU p i a upiig eeomn, otoe utl h following the until postponed development, surprising a in ,

that the European Council’s Council’s European the that roducing the Brussels Agreement theBrussels roducing injust

Serbian PresidentSerbian ute. Consequently, ute.

and Tahiri were replaced by Serbian prime minister minister prime Serbian by replaced were Tahiri and

r o rn Sri E cniay Te move The candidacy. EU Serbia grant to er . Three days later they emerged with emerged they later days Three . 50

cy chief Catherine Ashton. The Ashton. Catherine chief cy — Thaçi Tadić

inld o h E aed f the of ahead EU the to signaled the Belgrade the move . These political meetings were were meetings political These . , and gave way to agave andto way,

to postpone its decision on decision its postpone to U.N. - Pristina dialogue dialogue Pristina seven months. seven , rather than being being than rather , three — December December a dispute dispute a logistical

- rounds rounds

month month ocess. was was

CEU eTD Collection May 26,2015, International 69 Guardian Ian Traynor,“Serbia’ priznanje http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/nasl 2011., accessed2015, May 26, 68 that accord separate the be to was public about in it us had Serbia that adding eventually, EU the join would reacted posts, customs the on demonstrate tothe normalizationgreater a commitment process. commissioner enlargement post n to willingness Serbia’s checkpoints The Belgrade conflict needlessly

… “Serbia:‘won't recognize Tadić ever Kosovo’ “Füle: recognition donotaskfor We ofKosovo,” y poned

I em could ask my European colleagues whether they kept their promise, but Italk won't but promise, their theykept whether colleagues myEuropean ask could Stefanović Tadić Kos and Serbia between breakthrough the Despite

erged with erged were - . Kosova

h fnl ehia rud f h Belgrade the of round technical final the delayed dcso o wehr o grant to whether on decision a , , dist.

, who had risked his credibi his risked had who , rapidly emn, Britain, Germany, - http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Pristina dialogue: dialogue: Pristina .”

69 and Tahiri met Tahiri and by McClatchy

at a time when time a at technical expansions to December’s accord on customs posts, and a and posts, customs on accord December’s to expansions technical

allowed Kosovo officials Kosovo allowed s road to EU may be blocked as toEUmayches road be blocked dec aying,and cooperative were being ones established.

raie eain wt Ksv, and Kosovo, with relations ormalize Štefan

bitterly to the Council’s Council’s the to bitterly ovna/aktuelno.289.html:358426 -

Tribune Business News, December 12, 2011, accessed News,Business 12, December 2011, Tribune in Austria Decembe antagonistic norms antagonistic

Cooper’s office in office Cooper’s Füle ad h Netherlands the and , lity at home by authorizing by home at lity

stated stated 51 it

r 2011 r 2011

to participate in regional meetings and at and meetings regional in participate to

addt sau utl ac 2012 March until status candidate after EU delay after the decision that that decision the after Vecernje Novisti, - – Pristina

that Brussels on February 22, for what for 22, February on Brussels “ March 2012 March decision fulfilled all that was asked fr asked was that all fulfilled ckpoints return to the Balkans,” to ckpoints return governing

dialogue. Three days later later days Three dialogue. ,” - . 68 the Council Council the

FileNe . He . Adnkronos Adnkronos

v o te customs the on ovo

remained remained

December 19, December insisted earlier concessions earlier the Serbia the - trazimo

eba must Serbia December 9 9 December kpia of skeptical

that Serbia Serbia that - - Kosovo .

EU EU om om CEU eTD Collection MarchMay 2,2012,accessed 26,2015, 70 remarkablein the dialogue a achievement, by efforts result both sides ofthe demonstrated president Council European taken considerationat into thesummit. Council time the at Brussels Serbia for signal encouraging appearancealongside meeting officialsand assert to independence, the during agreed deals supersede Kosov declared 1244, Resolution Council Security that footnote a to attachedbe not Times York New the United Nations

Stephen Castle, “ On March 1, 2012, the European Council granted Serbia EU candidacy status. candidacy EU Serbia granted Council European the 2012, 1, March On With , d top

ooos needne elrto un declaration independence Kosovo’s upcoming the for agenda the on candidacy EU Serbian European

o an international protectorate; Serbian officials argued that the resolution the that argued officials Serbian protectorate; international an o to Kosovo’s name in such fora. I fora.such in name Kosovo’s to

as “diplomatically complex,” stipulated that stipulated complex,” “diplomatically as , ratherthan Serbia, Once Outcast, Is E.U. OnceSerbia, To Join Outcast, Candidate — eerd o oh ooos i Kosovo’s both to referred Füle said the deal was “ was deal the said

diplom ehia ngtain, h Fbur accord February the negotiations, technical , Ashton called the developments “a major step forward.” In forward.” step major“a developments calledthe Ashton , emn a Ro Van Herman

Gra frin minister foreign German , being represented by represented being t imdaey rie te deal the praised immediately ats

Serbian officials to reject to Serbian officials it.

h 1999 the http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic a bi a 52 g step in the right direction” and would be be would and direction” right the in step g

mpuy

nstead, other attendees would be directedbe would attendeesother nstead, .. euiy oni rslto that resolution Council Security U.N. ndependence e itrainl law. international der

UN ht a cle te eeomn “ development the called day that MIK

ud West Guido . The deal, referred to by the the toby The referred deal, . the word “republic” would “republic” word the declaration

,” I a high a In . New York Times Europea

erwelle allowed Kosovo Kosovo allowed

ie l other all Like n to and n Council n — - also profile profile U.N. , an an in 70 a .

CEU eTD Collection 73 http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic by 72 http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic He 71 limbo in disputants normalization concerns EU assuaged broken been l EU as monumental as only wa became possible inthe and registries, civil and diplomas like topics on deals technical previous than nature cooperation functional posi longstanding maintain to parties the R on position e note a permit to decision Kosovo’s and fora regional in participation of those norms cooperative of evolution continued the reflected bodies international eventually Pristina.” and Belgrade between

NewThere) Policy Serbia 9 A Way “(IsForwardfor and Center. Kosovo?” “ Stephen Castle, “

rald Tribune, McClatchy Serbia: President The i However, in representation Kosovo’s on accord February the it, before deals the Like EvolutionNormative reciprocity

led tothe

Council’s Council’s n eebr ih t with December in

esolution 1244 was a was 1244 esolution - process, prompted a and decision positive on Tribune Business News, March 13, 2012,accessed News,Business 2015, Tribune MarchMay 13, 26,

March 2012.Retrieved 2015, 3, May 26, t is difficult to argue that the February deal represented a represented deal February the that argue to difficult is t Serbia hails its clearhails its joiningSerbia paththeE.U. toward Wt the With . political phase ofthe Tadić and and . — oe to move The February deal and the December deal were more political in in political more were deal December the and deal February The eaders

atclry Germany’s particularly

sets 6May elections for date ucinl coope functional

ke of anke of had described had eosrbe salsmn o coeaie om since norms cooperative of establishment demonstrable

e utm agreement. customs he otoe dcso o Srin c Serbian on decision a postpone 71 reciprocal reciprocal

Tadić increasingly normative cultureincreasinglycooperation.normative of

tions on Kosovo’ on tions B 53 elgrade

ration hn called then eas apltcl tlmt a already had stalemate political a because ,

exchange. . .

— . Serbia’s move to permit Kosovar Kosovar permit to move Serbia’s . - Pristina Pristina bu Sri’ cmimn t the to commitment Serbia’s about ,”

73 hs development This Adnkronos InternationalAdnkronos snap

s status, indicating a norm of of norm a indicating status, s its its O dialogue nce again, the deal allowed deal the again, nce candidacy. elections, , . 72 International International

xplaining Serbia’s Serbia’s xplaining andidacy

mv that move a breakthrough breakthrough , particularly , hud have should - 10.

left the the left , dist. , dist.

they they

CEU eTD Collection intransigence act. to willing announcement resume late February until of outside negotiate to willing were they that strong to ever talk oee i Mrh 01 Sri ad Kosovo and Serbia 2011, March in opened s hs te technical the Thus, address politically charged issues. However, However, issues. charged politically address

at the Belgrade

, when it it when , T he

delay must be attr be must delay could have ended the previous the ended have could .

hs o ngtain edd ih the with ended negotiations of phase - Pristina dialogue Pristina

ibuted to the EU’s uncertainty EU’s the to ibuted 54

as as

Füle in December were more willing than than willing more were December in

EU hs oprtv nor cooperative this

December if the Council had been had Council the if December suggested. - mediated talks mediated

March — and not to not and , which did not did which ,

was m 2012

Council Council Serbian

o so not CEU eTD Collection normalizing of criteria EU the meet to interest best Serbia’s elections in was 2012 it May that calculated the following power to came that government Serbian the that Agreemen the Brussels Triggered What demonstrate theevolution ofcooperative continued norms factor landmark the facilitated was then It Agreement. Brussels the allowed that concessions Serbian Kosovo alone membership EU green to Council, claims toKosovo to decision government’s aff to continue officials wide Pr under paral the of control status, relinquish Kosovo’s of matter the sidestepped carefully which deal, of start the Agreement Brussels 8: The Chapter

instead - ranging autonomy. ranging .

A A r A Wh The . This final chapterfinal This . istina’s laws. In exchange, In laws. istina’s

subsequent section surveys events between May 2012 through July 2013 July through 2012 May between events surveys section subsequent ationalist explanation ationalist l te el ae te a fr the for way the paved deal the ile political

Brussels Agreement Agreement Brussels the gradual transformation of adversarial norms into cooperative cooperative into norms adversarial of transformation gradual the - were from that point forwardwere that point from light EU membership negotiations with Serbia, with negotiations membership EU light

negotiations between negotiations

that

Brussels Agree Brussels irm that all of Kosovo remains a part of Serbia, Serbia, of part a remains Kosovo of all that irm The sides agreed not to block the other’s EU bid. EU other’s the block to not agreed sides The

first prompt devolve lel structures in north Kosovo north in structures lel explains why explains

for the conclusion of the Brussels Agreement BrusselsAgreement the of conclusion the for was ed

major the parallel institutions institutions parallel the

Serbia to giveup to Serbia concluded in April 2013, April in concluded ment senior Serbian and Kosovar officials. officials. Kosovar and Serbian senior ity 55 t?

, and that Ashton’s mediation was a critical a was mediation Ashton’s that and , - cond

Serb northern provinces would be would provinces northern Serb primarily

Europe itionality was insufficient to induce theinduce to itionalityinsufficient was the parallel institutions in parallel institutions the symbolic. symbolic. n omsin ad ae the later and Commission, an

betweenand Serbia Kosovo

and permit them to operate to them permit and eosrts ht Serbian that demonstrates

only

it was not the draw of draw the not was it

argue

seven months after months seven Serbia Serbia s that instead it it instead that s While Serbian While the pledged might Undert ones that that ones northern

Serbian Serbian granted , which ,

hold . he he to to

CEU eTD Collection 2015, Serbian Progressive Party, “CoalitionAgreement,”Julyaccessed May 10,2012, 30, 74 inv September, that Assembly General U.N. the at government new the approached deals technical honor Serbia. in government elections general triggered that development the by decision The Belgrade perception with Ko dispute of the happened cooperation, functional reciprocity, of norms shared new, of presence the in reflected was that cooperation, proven past, of EU remained because membership, EU achieving rational of result direct the been have not could Kosovo calculations. maximization proces mediation duringthe officials Kosovar with deals reciprocal meetings of series another took it as however, case, the not was calculation.This re

lations with Kosovo, and then took steps to do so based on that utility that on based so do to steps took then and Kosovo, with lations NewThere) Policy Serbia 12 A Way “(IsForwardfor and Center. Kosovo?” - mediated negotiations had negotiations mediated http://www.sns.org.rs/images/pdf/Sporazum h Belgrade The Agr Brussels the Instead, exactly uh ale than earlier much , headed by Prime Minister Prime by headed , - Pristina dialogue Pristina the same the same uoen oni decision Council European - Prist

h peiu gvrmn hd authorized had government previous the

since the Belgradesince the n d ina The Serbian move to give up parallel institutions in northern in institutions parallel up give to move Serbian The s, offer carrots or sticks that sticks or carrotsoffer s,

pi 21, eas bfr ta pit Sri’ normative Serbia’s point, that before because 2013, April

successfully ialogue was was ialogue sovo did notpermitsovo did the agreement’s eet a cnldd eas a two a because concluded was eement : March March : Serbian motivations for cooperating with the EU the with cooperating for motivations Serbian and —

Ivic mediated negotiation. negotiation. mediated before the before 2012 56 fostered between Serbia and Kosovo a Kosovo betweenandSerbia fostered a -

Pristina dialoguePristina opened Dačić u o hold on put to grant Serbia EU candidacy status, a a status, candidacy EU Serbia grant to – -

sns April 2013 April

, affirmed in July that that July in affirmed , deal was achieved. was deal - sps influenced - pups -

hie calc choice followin

- h resulting The The deal The js - urs . t he disputants’ disputants’ he 74 the g provisions. -

10.07.2012.pdf U fiil then officials EU in March 2011. in ltos ie at aimed ulations

- Nor did Ash did Nor

year could not have not could - maximization Serbia would would Serbia March

p 13. oes of rocess — coalition coalition

history utility

and of of and 2012 iting ton, had .

CEU eTD Collection http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Monitoring 22, October Europe,2012, accessedMay 27,2015. 77 http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnaca TV, trans. BBC accessed Monitoring 21, October May Europe, 2012, 27,2015. “ 27, 2015. issues 76 the http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/europe/balkans/kosovo/223 Report No.Accessed 233.” FebruaryMay 19,2013. 6,2015. 75 would be relations of normalization the to lead would that process a in NATO, and EU USA, the of support held. be will talks dialogue“stat that stated dialogue, the continue to readyare Pristina in institutions provisional “ been had meeting the with forward level between 2012, 19, October meeting the for mandate negotiating a of completion the rejected entreaty the Kosovo with sign to them Serbia

“ Besnik “ Krasniqi, International “SerbiaKosovo: The Europe Group. Normalization. Path andto Crisis - EU facilitates meeting betweenEU premiers facilitatesmeeting Kosovo,Serbian path phase in the inthe phase ,” n premier viewsofmeetingn premier results counterpart withEU's Ashton,Kosovo n coe 21, el elected newly 2012, October In - Koha Ditore Koha an ” to

“ http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic

entirely coordinatedBaronessentirely withthe office of Ashton. - “ normalisation.pdf Serbia was ready to do so do to ready was Serbia ipeetto o peiu areet. H a He agreements.” previous of implementation d us negotiations; - neutral, talks ” 76 . New Kosovo New 75 , trans. BBC, trans. October Europe, 21, 2012,accessed Monitoring May

Thaçi

. Following the meeting, both sides indicated a willingness to press topress willingness a sidesindicated meeting,Following both the aime ”

Dačić

, for his part, his for , Dačić ht ih hv be a h a been have might what d at establishing whether we and the representatives of the the of representatives the and we whether establishing at d .

concluded, “ concluded, , -

Serb i n an interview with Serbia’s public broadcaster, said said broadcaster, public Serbia’s with interview an n

Dačić .” W .” ia talks agenda saidcover to ia talks technical open agenda

Serbian indicated a willingness to “w to willingness a indicated demic hile noting that the government consider government the that noting hile 57 , All in all the most important thing is that thethat thingis important most the all in All Thaçi

. . Belgrade

rsdn Tmsa Nklc announced Nikolic Tomislav president , and Ashton heralded a new, new, a heralded Ashton and , soi nraiain deal. normalization istoric - . Pristina Pristina

,” RTK, trans. BBC,” RTK, trans. dd ht h dialogue the that dded ” dialogue. 77 ” adding that he had he that adding ” -

serbia

ork hard, with the with hard, ork - and A n informal n - .” RTS kosovo senior Serbia ed the ed - -

CEU eTD Collection Report No. 233.” 3. 80 79 http://www.lexisnexi facilitated dialogue.” 78 http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic BBC Octoberaccessed May 27,2015. Europe, 20,2012, Monitoring Palokaj, Augustin. “ implemented. slowly were agreements technical previous of aspects 2013 Offices customs officials each housing side’s goods of crossing the facilitate to there stationed Servi Police [Kosovo Serbia, (EULEX, officers police three the of their one show to card would ID personal citizens crossings, “during Center, Policy New the to According offic “ambass representatives the calling as well as technical heritage. religious and cultural Serbian protecting for responsible comprisedSerbs, largely Kosovo unit, special of a form would police Kosovo Ashton, but Kosovo, and Serbia

NewThere) Policy Serbia 21. A Way “(IsForwardfor and Center. Kosovo?” D’Ime International “SerbiaKosovo: The Europe Group. Normalization. Path andto Crisis ers.” bt etns between meetings but , ce]) depending on who addressed them first.” Veterinary and sanitary officers were were officers sanitary and Veterinary first.” them addressed who on depending ce]) I posts. customs disputed two at enacted were policies new 2012, 10, December On Belgrade the of phase political new, The nstances court Dačić 78 issues related to the customs checkpoints checkpoints customs the to related issues

deal a , Lenaic. Belgrade, and EU/Serbia/Kosovo: agree Pristina steps inEU new and ,

of politically motivated violence erupted in northern Kosovo in January in Kosovo northern in erupted violence motivated politically of

o send to

Kosovo, Serbian Brussels in premiersKosovo, meet s.com/hottopics/lnacademic Thaçi Europolitics Monthly, Europolitics

continued

ed oebr prod 7 November held ilmtc representatives diplomatic Dačić dr, wie egae referred Belgrade while adors,” , ne Thaçi vertheless 58

December 12,2012,accessedMay 27,2015. n Aho cniud n h meantime the in continued Ashton and “were moved closer together.” movedcloser “were

. . . An informal working dinner between between dinner working informal An . -

Pristi cd n gemn udr hc the which under agreement an uced at No .

meetings in ea in meetings n Dačić o ah te’ capitals other’s each to a dialogue drew protests in b in protests drew dialogue a

state symbols were displayed. displayed. were symbols state

and .” Koha Ditore Koha Thaçi 80

rly December 2012, December rly o hm s “liaison as them to

However, o However,

agreed

, trans.

Kosovo . on some on n

April as , oth -

CEU eTD Collection separates accessed May 27,2015. “ 27, 2015. be 82 http://www.economist.com/blogs/easternapproaches/2013/04/serbia “Serbia NoDeal.” and Kosovo: 2013, accessed2015, May 26, 81 Normaliz the day following the mara After meeting. Commission European Brussels The Agreement “ remained he agreement can re be that and Ashton, by circulated proposal a full in accepted talks. long these after thoughts our gather to end,” EU. it which then Pristina and Belgrade that “grim Appearing talks. Economist, further no organize would she Belgrade between talks of round eighth the after 3, Serbia

Besnik “ Krasniqi, McLaughlin, Daniel, “

reached 81

adjourned the adjourned

Dačić - Dačić Dačić EU accessEU was expected to expected was - - Pristina Pristina serbia http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic ,” ,”

Ashton called Ashton said in a press appearance, “w appearance, press a in said Koha Ditore,Koha

to o Relations of ation and and - news dialogue Thaçi ion talks face‘narrowion talks but deep’ Thaçi having initialed initialed having talks ached.” Kosovo PM: Meeting PM: counterpart likelyKosovo Serbian difficult, accord to - 518851 , however, insisted that the dialogue was not over. over. not was dialogue the that insisted however, ,

http://www.euractiv.com/enlargement/narrow Kosovo and Serbia to Kosovo fail

two weeks ahead of a meeting of the European Commission European the of meeting a of ahead weeks two returned to Brussels on April 18, 2013, four days ahead of the of ahead days four 2013, 18, April on Brussels to returned issue recommendations on Serbia and Kosovo’s future with the the with future Kosovo’s and Serbia on recommendations issue

differences between the sides “ sides the between differences

trans. BBC Europe,trans. April 4,2013.Accessed Monitoring May could contact her if they wished to return to the dialogue. S dialogue. the to return to wished they if her contact could had 82

. http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic

reached an reached Economist ” The .” a

15 - point point accord Dačić

, April 3,2013,accessed 2015. May 27, e have some more time to reach a solution and solution a reach to time more some have e impasse 59 thon talks, the ministers and Ashton emerged Ashton and ministers the talks, thon ”

“ First Agreement of P of Agreement First which , Thaçi

and and

agree pact Kos

over the parallel institutions parallel the over Thaçi

insisted that the Kosovar side h side Kosovar the that insisted ovo gap i nt drs the address not did very narrow, but deep, but narrow, very . , Ashton told the press that the that press the told Ashton ,

,” - faced,” according to the the to according faced,” .” Euractiv, April 3, 2013, .” Euractiv, Irish Times - and rinciples Governing rinciples - deep - kosovo , April 4, , - “The isn’t the the isn’t “The gap

oeu an hopeful . matter of of matter

- . ,

”

and

adding adding

that ,

he he ad ad at CEU eTD Collection remains MacDowell, Andrew.“ information/serbia/index_en.htm http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/countries/detailed Negotiations: Serbia.” accessed May n.d., 27,2015, 85 remains Andrew “ MacDowell, 84 http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic remains Andrew “ MacDowell, http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Times, 83 in enacted was which EU, the with Agreement Association and Stabilization a to path a The follo the matter the begin. approved European Council Serbia with negotiations accession formal that recommendation a issued W entire the Europe to closer “ it calling Ashton with landmark, Kosovo police. U.N. the at Kosovo to continue to Serbia allowed This accession. could sides the that indicate to changed was institutions” blocking from Serbia barring language Kosovo, autonomy. maintaining significant while laws Pristina’s under operate would institutions Kosovo northern status, Kosovo’s

European “European Policy Neighborhood Commission. and Enlargement Dan Bilefsky, “ Dan Bilefsky, “

April 20,2013,accessed May 27,2015. The deal was immediately hailed by European diplomats and media outlets as a as outlets media and diplomats European by hailed immediately was deal The .” .” ,”

Christian ScienceChristian Monitor

sen akn rgo ad o te EU the for and region Balkans estern

83 ,” and ,”

S Serbia an Serbia ulnd plan a outlined erbia and KosovoReacherbiaand onPower Agreement

A second Kosovar concession permi concession Kosovar second A Serbia Serbia Serbia Füle n last a In

d KosovoReach onPower Agreement

- - deeming it “a it deeming -

Kosovo deal clears path EU to accession, Kosovo dealclears butlong road Kosovo deal Kosovo deal clears path E to Kosovo dealclears . -

minute wording change reflecting a concession by by concession a reflecting change wording minute o devolve to step away from the past and, for both of them, a step step a them, of both for and, past the from away step , April 25, 2013, accessed , AprilMay 25,2013, 27,2015. clears path EU to accession,clears butlong road

60 historic day for Serbia for day historic

h prle institutio parallel the wing June. wing otne working continue . .

- country

.”

84 ooo ety o “international to entry Kosovo’

tted more autonomy for northern northern for autonomy more tted h Cmiso Arl 2 then 22 April Commission The - 85 U accession, butlong road

For Kosovo, the deal cleareddeal the ForKosovo, o bok ah ot each block not - -

Sharing Sharing gis rcgiin of recognition against - s y tpltn that stipulating by ns Ko sovo relations, for for relations, sovo .” .” ,” New York h e rs’ EU EU rs’ CEU eTD Collection information/kosovo/index_en.htm http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/countries/detailed Negotiations: Kosovo.” n.d.,accessed May 27,2015, 86 Belgrade the in invested was side past of implementation continuing but slow p the where up pick and Brussels, in table negotiating the approach to government Serbian elected newly the possible. Brus the that process decayed negotiation the of had course the Kosovo over enough and Serbia between relationship the governed had that norms cooperation, functional summit. U.N. EU’s the of refusal Serbia’s in evident institutions parallel the relinquishing considered officials much it conclusion;deal’s the to essential was norms cooperative p between negotiations EvolutionNormative and Kosovothathad 2014. July ermitted

European “European Policy Neighborhood Commission. and Enlargement earlier because cooperative norms had not developed to the point point the to developed not had norms cooperative because earlier First, during norms cooperative shared of development continued The

86 h cnlso o te rses gemn i Arl 2013. April in Agreement Brussels the of conclusion the

T it was a previously est previously a was it he normalization normalization he

Instead, revious government had left off. left had government revious hindered each side’s

Dačić and

h da ws ocue atr hrd om of norms shared after concluded was deal the

eitd negotiation mediated and

agreement . Thaçi

- ablished culture of cooperati of culture ablished rsia dialogue Pristina , combined with the draw of EU membership, membership, EU of draw the with combined ,

normalization normalization inte marked an end to end an marked 61 reciprocal gration the EU. into

country ece a critic a reached ad a cpbe f epn past keeping of capable was and , The sides were able to look to the the to look to able were sides The

rpsl t h Septemb the at proposal d - other the that evidence as eals

could not have beenhave not could an a

stalemate between Serbia between stalemate on available sels Agreement became became Agreement sels

that paved the way for for way the paved that l mass al

h eouin of evolution The option where Serbian Serbian where Antagonistic . reciprocity, Ti is This . achieved political political er 2012 2012 er

CEU eTD Collection producedBrussels Agreement. the calling sides the with meeting upcomingCommission the toward a with that and existed, alreadycooperate to will the that for insufficient were norms when time a at cooperation force to designed evidently was move Cooper’s strategy indicatingmake aauspices ofEU theirunder deal mediation. to desire the process; thepresence normsprompted ofthese c EU the successful of mediation of history a with combined disputants, the between established been negotiating. keep to willingness a indicated B the that April in announcement Ashton’s after table negotiating the to back sides the bringing in essential was mediator, the upon cooperation. maintain to sides po the allowing while relations of normalization the blocking reciprocal oftheir deals own. agreements iin o te tts f ooo dmntaig dvlpn nr of norm developing a demonstrating Kosovo, of status the on sitions stns oe o pause to move Ashton’s of An established norm deals new The from Cooper’s decision to postpone meetings during the summer of 2011. While 2011. of summer the duringmeetings postpone to decision Cooper’s from .

ne Aho’ mediation, Ashton’s Under

elgrade onflict,

ocue b concluded evident in negotiators’ statements to the media. Moreover, it was it Moreover, media. the to statements negotiators’ in evident for another meeting that that meeting another for - Pristina dialogue Pristina

eutd n hg dge of degree high a in resulted a d a

eal on the customs posts, Ashton appears to have gambled gambled have to appears Ashton posts, customs the on eal me

the dialogue in this manner was was manner this in dialogue the diated negotiation, It worked have wouldnot y Dačić Dačić , a deal could be reached. The gamble worked,gamble reached.Thebe could deal a , 62

would only continue if Belgrade and Pristina Pristina and Belgrade if continue only would and

Demonstrable cooperative norms that had had that norms cooperative Demonstrable both sides toimmediately both issue

Thaçi and took place on April 19, 2013, and and 2013, 19, April on place took

in which the sides trusted and relied relied and which thesides trusted in Thaçi lk ps ones past like , push

ofdne n h negotiation the in confidence

12 then concluded a series of of series a concluded then

and a not a and

months previously.months based in a different different a in based a , - so desd issues ddressed

- subtle gesture subtle cooperative cooperative statements functional functional

their

CEU eTD Collection Organization 87 deals technical early The relationship. data registry civil on deals political less These fifth. the at deals officials, Kosovar and Serbian between allowed talks mediated of rounds process negotiation the was them between norms adversarial cooperation which in situation This option. viable a not had began, talks mediated when 2011, March encouraging of increasinglyconclusion deals theconsequential maintaining shared of development the inducing T mediators 2013 April than earlier deal normalization a on agreed have would Kosovo and Serbia were, integration. EU toward paths respective their unblock would that two the between membershi EU of prospect Conclusion e rmr rl o te EU the of role primary he

Wendt, “TheWendt, Agent . nta, the Instead, Adversarial norms that governed the relationship b relationship the governed that norms Adversarial table, negotiating the to Kosovo and Serbia brought conditionality EU While

induced the incremental evolution of adversarial norms into cooperative ones. ones. cooperative into norms adversarial of evolution incremental the induced the dialogue, helping to identify areas where cooperation was was cooperation where areas identify to helping dialogue, the , 335

setal cagd h chem the changed essentially 370. mutually constituted and codetermined and constituted mutually ht oend h relationship the governed that rses Ag Brussels - Structure Problem in International Relations,” ProblemStructure in

started as started

a nt srn eog da t pop a agreement an prompt to draw enough strong a not was n aiiaig h da bten eba n Kosovo and Serbia between deal the facilitating in reement a competitive, zero competitive, a

, cooperative norms; mediators norms; cooperative , ilge n the and dialogue

created a a created

olwd a followed and 63

allowed allowed

created created issues like diplomas and the the and diplomas like issues sr o te self the of istry . modest

n thi In two - sum game for both. for game sum a situation where coope where situation a the salsmn o a relationship a of establishment - year process during which EU EU which during process year mne, h cnlc system conflict the manner, s , and created a situation situation a created and , was oprtv foundation cooperative etween Serbia and Kosovo in Kosovo and Serbia etween conclusion of of conclusion

. mosbe enocd the reinforced impossible

- enocn, adversarial reinforcing,

did this primarily by by primarily this did International 87 early technical technical early

The first four first The possible exchange of of exchange ration was was ration

where under under , and and ,

If it it If was was the

CEU eTD Collection 10. 88 the path EU to membership. Kosovo mediators, EU by and posts customs on impasse an break developed to conditionality on lean been anwithout extended negotiation achieved process. value, concessions concluded. table negotiating the to Kosovo and expec an with a adversaryone’s of as sensenew a of combination time over strengthened norms mediator trustworthy them between dispute the characterized concluded deals resulting the implement side each which

Moravcsik

stale ”

If EU If ; the stalemate that blocked Serbia and Kosovo from EU integration would have have would integration EU from Kosovo and Serbia blocked that stalemate the

mate i t was this this was t —

hl ec sil anand rgd oiin n h pltcl ipt that dispute political the on position rigid a maintained still each while ” uh s hn opr otoe te uy 01 meeting 2011 July the postponed Cooper when as such

because “ because conditionality were conditionality tation that beneficial deals coul deals beneficial that tation rekindled d Vachudova, could observe could

disrupted a self a disrupted mechanism that broke the stalemate between stalemate the broke that mechanism could the basic benef basic the .

The force

incremental ep facili help “ as EU mediators worked to move the process forward process the move to worked mediators EU as National Interests,National

first, that first, cooper ( -

reciprocity reinforcing truly powerful truly — again and again until the Brussels Agreement was was Agreement Brussels the until again and again it offered to them to offered it h rcs of process the ation ae suc tate

estab

the other the 64 (

ucinl cooperation functional ) before before ; relationship adversarial d lishment of cooperative norms cooperative of lishment

eod that second, be reached at negotiations, at reached be deals h enough that “a that enough State Power, Enlargement andState EU more reasonablemoreadversary cooperative norms were sufficiently sufficiently were norms cooperative would make concessions and concessions make would normative evolution normative 88 —

Moreover, EU tried to whenthe ( eitd negotiation mediated me

mbership reciprocal pplicants them and put both on both put and them ; and );

between Serbia and Serbia between

—

n n tep to attempt an in deals could be be could deals

is of such great such of is are forced into forced are

a impede was

third, third, drew Serbia Serbia drew , facilitated , , combined , ).

ht a that would The . ,” The The

se se d, CEU eTD Collection http://www.b92.net/eng/news/region.php?yyyy=2015&mm=01&dd=14&nav_id=92857 2015, accessed 1,2015, June 90 herzegovina http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2014/20141008 accessed May 31,2015, 89 ad at aimed sides two the between Moreover resolution. a prompt somehow tha hope apparent the in applied stick a issue, receptivity integration. toBosnian EU cooperation preclude Srpska Republika defining characteristic con Bosniak the entities, Bosnia mechanism a as Balkans. Western the in expand to seeks it as EU the for implications policy important has finding co into norms adversarial transform to seeks that process mediation a can conflicts intractable seemingly that demonstrates Agreement Policy Impl

“Vucic, Dodik discuss‘ European “Bosniaand Herzegovina Commission, Progress 2014, October 4, Report,” stitutional reforms the EU had deemed had EU the reforms stitutional - The EU The a particular, In Brussels the in resulted that Kosovo and Serbia between dialogue mediated The Herzegovina

h rltosi bten fiil i te Bosniak the in officials between relationship the - ications for the the EU for ications progress s

f h dsue ewe Sri ad Kosovo: and Serbia between dispute the of in 2013 cut off millions of dollars in pre in dollars of millions off cut 2013 in o drs a address to Bosnia . - - report_en.pdf

ra Fdrto ad h Rpbia Srpska, Republika the and Federation Croat mediation process mediation

Bosnia'sre EUpath, ’s

EU integration is is integration EU ipt bten h adve the between dispute

90 rsig h cnttto issue. constitution the dressing

like the Belgrade the like ; ,

necessary 65 Füle and

lations in region’,” in B92.com,Januarylations 14,

n al 21 edd mdain effort mediation a ended 2014 early in second, te rw f U ebrhp would membership EU of draw the t precluded . 89

The disp The -

accession aid accession both - sra ette tha entities rsarial Pristina dialogue could serve could dialogue Pristina - pri Croat Federation and the the and Federation Croat

sides ute in Bosnia shares Bosnia in ute first, marily because the two two the because marily be disentangled through through disentangled be - bosnia operative ones. This ones. operative

desra norms adversarial to Bosnia to ha sre o the of survey A on agree cannot ve indicated a a indicated ve - and comprise t -

over the the over

key .

CEU eTD Collection herzegovina#.VWxJcksVpuY 31, 2015, 2014:BosniaFreedom theWorld in House, “Freedom new accessed May 31,2015, 91 norms cooperative new, of power staying for Egypt the within their In limited moment.” more the the of beyondsuccess well extend potential and importance whose but years, of o kinds new system conflict a within embed It disputants. of structure preference the of reordering a than more ANorms issues have achi not,andwill not, results. the inducing at aimed Bosniak other addressing cooperative mediation pausing and sticks applying that suggests Kosovo and Serbia between Agreement Brussels the to leading conditions

Elvira Jukic, “AshtonElvira switches toeconomy,” Jukic, 13, 2014, EUfocusonBosnia March the 1979 Camp David Accords.the 1979Camp David - focus

Unfortunately, the case of Serbia and Kosovo lacks such a hard test for the the for test hard a such lacks Kosovo and Serbia of case the Unfortunately, norms a arguethat Tomlin and Mandell I EU demands that the disputants to immediately resolve fundamentally divisive divisive fundamentally resolve immediately to disputants the that demands EU - nstead, the EU should begin setting up a Brussels a up setting begin should EU the nstead, Croat Croat - https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom - Based Approach to to Mediation Approach Based on results. - bosnia eeain n t and Federation smaller , - Israeli conflict system a s a system conflict Israeli 91 .

http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/eu

vlto o coeaie norms cooperative of evolution

ehia polm that problems technical .

e eulk Srpska Republika he eve much.

td, hy argue they study,

in the relationship between them between relationship the in for 66

et of cooperative norms norms cooperative of et

f behavior that are not realized for a number number a for realized not are that behavior f

og eid o tm de nt produce not does time of periods long - based approach to mediation “ mediation to approachbased -

world/2014/bosnia tm rm t from stem .

Herzegovina,” n.d., accesseHerzegovina,” n.d., that Kissinger’s ability to embed embed to ability Kissinger’s that cnitn EU consistent A - could based mediation effort mediation based e iiin ewe the between division he

rdc consequential produce may - s created - - ashton and well promote and promote well eito effort mediation - . Yet w Yet .

- a foundation a presents accomplish hile the hile d May aimed - CEU eTD Collection 312047 http://www.euractiv.com/sections/enlargement/belgrade 92 effort mediation similar a undertake norms a with Th cooperationamongfacilitate adversarial sides. unprecedented cooperation normative 2013 in BrusselsAgreement the of that Balkans Western the Belgrade 2015 S cooperation, cooperative between Mitrovica do to including ofthecomposition judici normalization backsliding significant implementatio

“Belgrade meet about . is difficult of example one only is Kosovo and Serbia between dispute The still Kosovo and Serbia

- Pristina dialogue. Pristina on practical issues such as the composition of the the of composition the as such issues practical on i ng - eainhp ewe Serbia between relationship Pristina dialoguePristina resumes,” Eura - h msie odlc that roadblock massive the

n of the Brussels Agreement has has Agreement Brussels the of n based erbian prime minister Aleksandar Vučić noted Vučić Aleksandar minister prime erbian otne, with continues, tha sc ise wud ae o e addressed be to have would issues such t

its mediation —

eb n Abna sides. Albanian and Serb

ary innorthKosovo.

combined have since its its since 92

hamper

the sides in February 2015 2015 February in sides the taey for strategy

ean a aat on apart far remain demonstrates ih h da o E membership EU of draw the with to break the stalemate the break to conclusion ed

EU integration in the region. Yet the conclusion the Yet region. the in integration EU and Kosovo, Kosovo, and 67

still still h Belgrade the ctiv, February 1, June 2,2015,accessed

that consistent EU mediation that fosters mediationthat EU thatconsistent iie te northern the divides en rocky been h Belgrade The u i But ay oiial charged politically many - n te Us oe n facilitating in role EU’s the and pristina n - rsia ilge and dialogue, Pristina

tsaet o h evolving the to testament a civil defense civil in Bosnia in

agreeing there , at the close of close the at

- e EU must press forward press forward must e EU t uue ons f the of rounds future at dialogue - Pristina dialogue on on dialogue Pristina

- also

Herz — o deal a to ooo on of town Kosovo

- force resumes s suffic is

a nt been not has egovina. It is It egovina. a ,

and February

t must it - sues in sues on the the on et to ient topics what ,

CEU eTD Collection Declaration 93 Declaration that efforts such through

European Commission , .

that “t he future of the Balkans is within the EuropeanBalkanshe ofthe future iswithin Union.

EU h EU the -

Western Thessaloniki, 21June 2003 Summit: Balkans

a fulfill can 68

h poie f the of promise the

03 Thessaloniki 2003 ” 93

CEU eTD Collection agreement accessed May 30,2015, 94 majorityLeposavic).Zubin (NorthernZvecan, municipalities and Mitrovica, Potok The equivalent Kosovostructures. onlyKP. from the bein northern integrated Kosovo Police framework. shall intheKosovo Salaries be will aInenvisaged. monitoring roleis ofthis function thepursuit authorities anda have will seat thecommunities' in purpose.councilthis consultativefor be delegated by thecent development, health, education, urbanrural and planning. The Association/Communityhave will of fulloverview ofeconomic theareas cooperateCommunity/Associa inexercising powers their through the lawSelf Governmentthe participatingentitledKosovo to shall be municipalities and vice Pre basis as theexistingstatute ofthee.g.Kosovo municipalities Association of President, provide Legalonly ofa takemunicipalities. theparticipating decision place by guarantees be will agreement. Kosovo. Membership wi years EU of Ivica Appendix 1: Text of the Agreement of Brussels 1: Text Appendix

“ Text Of Leaked Of Text Of Serbia Copy Dačić 9. There Regionala the Police shallbefourfor Serb Commander northern bewill 8. Memberssecurity offered Serbian ofother a structures place 7. T 6. The Community/Association have shall rolerepresentative tothecentral a 5. The Association/Community exerciseadditional aswill competences may other In4. accordance competences given withthe by theEuropeanLocal Charter of 3. The beestablished the structures Association/Community onthesame will of 2. TheIts Community/Association becreated statute. will shall by dissolution 1. Therean Association/Community be majority will Serb in municipalities of --- dealwas The following initialed on d by applicable law andd by applicable constitutionallaw (including law the2/3majority rule). sident, Assembly, Council. sident, Assembly,

- brussels/24963542.html here policecalledtheKosovo shallbe Police. one forceAllpolice inKosovo

- and Kosovar prime Hashim minister and Kosovar mediated negotiation rounds that began roundsthat onMarch negotiation mediated 8,2011.

ral authorities. ral http://www.rferl.org/content/text ll bell open toany other provided municipality the are in members

. - Kosovo Recognition DealKosovo Recognition

April 19,2013,April by Serbian prime minister 69

Thaçi . It is the product of just over. Itisthe productjust of two -

leaked

,” RFE/RL, April 20,2013, ,” RFE/RL, April - copy tion collectively. tion - serbia 94

- kosovo in

- CEU eTD Collection facilitation of theEU. side's theirEU progressin respective path. completed 15. by June standards. with the facilitation ofKosovolaw inaccordance theOSCE and international with dependant sit will onthe naturecase ofthe involved. of the above be composed will ofK/Sjudges.Appropriate division judges by a majority ju of K/Sjudges all KosovoSerb with majority todeal municipalities. establish will framework. inPristina Court The a panel Appellate ofa composed majority the four cooperate municipalities northern will other regional with commanders. ofmunicipalities Mitrovica Skenderaj South, Vushtrri). The and commanderof regional of the (There be fourwill anotherRegional municipalities. ofthenorthcomposition reflect KPin will ethnic ofthe composition population the from provided by alist thefourof the mayorsThe Community/Association. onbehalf Commander shallbe of region anominated by this KosovoSerb th dges permanently sit will in northernDistrict (Mitrovica Mitrovica Court).Each panel 15. Animplementation committee be will established by twosides, withthe the 14 13. DiscussionsonEnergy byand be twosides Telecomsand intensified will the 12. Municipal elections s Appellate ofthis both by11. Adivision Court,composed administrative and staff 10. The judicialoperate authorities willbeintegratedand within the . It. agreed side block,ortothe is thatneither will other encourage others

hall be organized municipalities inthe2013 northern

Commander for the for Commander e Ministry of Interioreof Ministry

Kosovo legal Kosovo

CEU eTD Collection Castle, Stephen. Castle, Stephen. “SerbiaClearHails Pathtoward its J Carnevale, “Strategic Choice Peter. inMediation.” B Brunwasser, “ Matthew. “Better Prospects “TBercovitch, Houston. and Jacob, Allison Beha,Adam. Over “Disputes the 15 Beesley,“SerbianI Deal Arthur. Kosovo with “Balkans: KosovoBarsSerbian B Ajeti, Blerton. it. “Sign “A Kos aliqi, Bekim. aliqi, Bekim. ytyci,Robinson. andMatt Fatos, 2012. http://www.lex Tribune, 41 25, 2015. Name 75533 2015. Rienner, 1996. Practice ofMediation UsesIn and Empirical Evidence.” Kosovo and Serbia.” 201 Times, 2015. Distributed Mutual Recognition? 2015. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kosovo/etc/cron.html Bibliography ovo Chronology.” Frontline.ovo Chronology.” May PBS, n.d.Accessed 18,2015. - 56 2012. 5. http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic . .” Accessed2015. May 26, http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic . http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2011&mm=07&dd=20&nav_id= http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic

February

Policy Briefs Kosovo:Dialogue Kosovo New York Times, New York

March “Serbia,Once Out Accessed26, 2015. May for Agreemfor

by McCl

isnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic ” 3, Serbia Agreement, and an by KosovoReach Asterisk With Kosovo’s 25,

Express, 2012. 2012. 2012. atchy

Nationalities Papers Nationalities Pristina: KonradPristina: , edited by, edited Bercovitch, 11 Jacob ent i Goods i Accessed May 26,2015.

Februa -

n Sep February Accessed May 26, Business News, Tribune “Press cast, Is E.U. To Join cast, Candidate - Point Agreement on Normalization of onNormalization RelationsBetween Agreement Point http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic tember. n Tit ry ure onSerbia Grows overKosovo. Resolving International Conflicts: the TheoryInternational and Resolving http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic 25, he Study of Internationalhe Study Theoretical of Mediation: 22, - - For mp Adenauer 2012. ” 2012. 2012. Beta roves Prospectscandidacy.roves ofEU -

Tat Trade Spat 43, no.1(January 102 2015): 71 Negotiation JournalNegotiation Accessed MayAccessed 26, oining theE.U. , July

Accessed May 26, - Serbia: Normalization ofReports or Serbia: Normalization - .

Stiftung, March 2013. July 20, - . 35. Boulder; London:Lynne35. Boulder; . . .

2011. 21, . ” ” Adnkronos International Adnkronos

2011. New York Times ” Accessed MayAccessed 23,

International Herald International

2, no.1

Accessed MayAccessed 23, ” . Reuters

- ( 121. January 1986 ”

, Irish

, January March .

. .

2, ) :

CEU eTD Collection “Fule: R donotAskfor We 2014: BosniaFreedom theWorld in House. “Freedom European Council. European Council. European Commission. European “Bosnia Commission. Progress and Herzegovina Report,” 4.October 2014.Accessed European Commission. “EU’ “EUUN For Calls Security Calm AsHoldsEmerg Council Demp Deda,Ilir,and Ariana Qosaj “Country News World Profile:Digest, Kosovo.” s A sey, MacFarquhar. Judy, and Neil FileNe Accessed May 26,2015. herzegovina#.VWxJcksVpuY 2015. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms 4 df http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2011/package/ks_rapport_2011_en.p SEC(2011)Final 1207 bosnia May 31,2015 163_en.htm 21,2003.AccessedJune May 20,2015. http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Europe Monitoring http://www.rferl.org/content/security_counc Liberty Radio Free Europe/Radio from Tensions. for Policy Development Prishtina: 2013.1 and Research June (KIPRED). Agreements Kosovo andSerbia, Between 2/13. http://wnd.infobaselearning.com/recordurl.aspx?wid=10835&nid=477061&umbtype=0 2015. shton saysshton Kosovo - 5. Accessed May 29,2015. .

http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic https://freedomhouse.org/report/fr - - and trazimo ”

- New York TimesNew York herzegovina EU Conclusions .

, - http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2014/20141008 - F priznanje Commission Staff Working Staff Commission Report. Paper: Kosovo2011Progress EU acilitat . March 9,2011.Accessed May19, 2015. - - ecognition o Serbia Talksfor P Region’s ‘Essential’ EU West - Mustafa. . Brussels: Accessed 12, October Ma 2011. - ed Dialogue: A progress – http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/aktuelno.289.html:358426 - ern Balkans Summit: Thessaloniki, 21June 2003Declaration Summit: ern Balkans

Kosova 9 December 2011. , July .

The Analysis of theImplementation the of Technical The Analysis of

f Kosovo.” f Kosovo.” “Kosovo Firebombing“Kosovo - 28, , July . report_en.pdf

2011. 27, greement onIBM eedom http://europa.eu/rapid/press

Infobas 2011. 72 Accessed il_meeting_kosovo_urgent/24279185.html Vecernje Novisti

_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/126714.pdf EUCO 1.25January 139/1/11REV 2012:

- R Herzegovina.” n.d.. AccessedHerzegovina.” May n.d.. 31, . world/2014/bosnia

. eport prepared for the Kosovo Instituteeport prepared Kosovo for the e Learning,e n.d.

Accessed May 23, 2015. ency Meeting On Kosovoency Violence. Meeting

May .

Underscores New EthnicUnderscores . Brussels: . 24, , December 201 rospects

y 17,2015. Retrieved MayRetrieved 18, 5 - and - December release_PRES - .” 19, - BBC 19. 2011.

2, 2011.

- - 03 .

- . , .

”

- CEU eTD Collection Jah Jacks Independence“International News:Legal.” Kosovo Ruled International Group Crisis International “ Group. Crisis International Group. Crisis International Group. Crisis International Group. Crisis I “InSymbolic Kosovo,Serbs HoldVote. International in Hopf, ofConstructivism Ted. “ThePromise Theory.” Relations InternationalGoertz, Gary, Diehl.F. “Towarda and Theoryof Paul Norms.” “Highligh nbar, Efraim. and “GreatMediation:Israelinbar, ThetheMay Power USA 1983 n, George.Interview: Diplomat Serb W “AP on, Richard.In “Constructivism and Conflict Resolution.” kosovo 2011. LosLondon: 2009. 189. SAGE, Angeles; Resolution, http://wnd.infobaselearning.com/recordurl.aspx?wid=10835&nid=267194&umbtype=0 Accessed May 19,2015. ht 131. No. the http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/ 233 Group Europe Report 215 No. after http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/europe/balkans/kosovo/206 Recommendations. %20A%20Little%20Goodwill%20Could%20Go%20a%20Long%20Way.pdf d%20Serbia%20 http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/europe/balkans/kosovo/215%20Kosovo%20an Report 215 Agreement.” Security May 23,2015. Resolution tp://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/europe/Kosovo%2031.pdf - ts from Serbian Press 21 Jul 11. Press 21Jul ts from Serbian .” February Accessed May 19,2013. 6,2015. path - the Accessed2015. May 23, - progress - -

23, no.1(Summer 1998): 171 to Pristina/Belgrade/Brussels: 3,2002.Accessed June May 1,2015. icj

- . 36, no.4(December 1992): 634 normalisation.pdf -

edited byBercovitch,I. and VictorZartman, Jacob Kremenyuk, William 172 February2012. Accessed May 2, 7,2015. opinion.aspx Journal of PeaceJournal of Research

http:// - - 193611589.html .

August 2010.Accessed 26, May 7,2015. UNMIK’s Tackling Albatross: DivisioninMitrovica, Balkans Report Goo Little Kosovo andSerbia: A Kosovo andSerbia the After ICJ GoodwillWay. GoLittle Could Kosovo andSerbia: ALong A Europe Serbia and Kosovo: the Path to Normalization. Pathto EuropeSerbia Kosovo: the Report and No. www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic .

. media/Files/europe/balkans/kosovo/223

, http://news.yahoo.com/ap February ” .

Wall Journal Street ”

BBC Europe Monitoring - 200. ants Kosovo

2, 2012.

28, no. 1 (February 71 28, no. 1991): - 73 664.

1 - Facts OnFile Facts 23

dwill Could Go a Long Way.dwill Go Could aLong Crisis Opinion: Executive Summary and Progress.” , .

February The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Handbook ofConflict The SAGE - interview , July . Associated Press Associated

15, 15, , July 22,2010. - kosovo 21, - - serb . 2012. Lebanese

- Journal of Conflict Journal ofConflict serbia 2011. - 84. - International diplomat

and - and Accessed .

- serbia - , kosovo - July wants - . 4,

- - - CEU eTD Collection “Kosovo, Serbia “Kosovo Profile “Kosovo P “Kosovo InstituteKosovo PolicyDev for and Research “Kosovo Endgame: Meeting Vienna Pave Must Final Way Settlement T to “Kosovo CrossingMove Opened; “Kosovo CrossingMove Opened; Independence“Kosovo ‘Supervised’ Ends Klaiqi, Valmir. “Here istheAgreement. Klaiqi, Valmir. “Final Preparations. Kaufman, Michael. “ J Tim. Judah, ukic, Elvira. “Ashton switches toeconomy.”13, 2014.Accessed EUfocusonBosnia March 23, 2015. http://www.bbc.com/news/world 26, 2015. 2015. July Ilir,and Qosaj Implementation of theTechnicalBetweenand 2/13,”Deda, Serbia, Agreements Kosovo http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Times, http://www.lexi Reuters 2015. Union. independence 2012. Accessed May 7,2015. 2011. 25, letting Accessed May 20, 2015. on May 31,2015, Police Blocked byLocalsPolice Blocked a - bosnia olice, 2011. 26, Kosovo: WarKosovo: and Revenge

http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Accessed2015. May 23, -

” a 15 OctoberAccessed May 2003. 18,2015. ,

- 2011. Gazette December president

– Protesters Clash nearProtesters Border. Serbia Agree on Issues Agree t on . http://www.lexisnexis.co http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Accessed

Timeline.” The Dangers of Letting Dangers Reada of The President - - ends/24703540.html Accessed MayAccessed 24, Mustafa, Ariana, 2013): 5. (June Mustafa, Prishtina: http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/eu snexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic

(Montreal - read.html 8, May 2011. Accessed May2011. BBC News

21, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/1999/05/22/books/the ), o Ea Designed t Designed t ”

. D t Northern Border,t Northern Conflict Express http://www.rferl.org/content/kosovo

ecember

se Strain.” http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic . New Haven, CT; London: Haven,. NewCT; University Yale Press, 2000. ” - , November 11, , November 2014. Accessed May 1,2014.

europe Express. .” m/hottopics/lnacademic .

http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Radio Free Europe/RadioRadio Liberty o Help Serbiao Help Serbiao Help . Translated by . Translated elopment (KIPRED),elopment “The Analysis ofthe 8, - 18331273 2011. Associated Press

Translated by 74 26, ”

2015 Reuters Accessed . .

. in its Bidin its t Bidin its t .

BBC Monitoring Europe .” . . ,

January

New York New York Ti

Looming.” BBC Europe, Monitoring July

- May . . s ,

- July ashton

o Join o Join o Join

26, 16, 16, 3, - alks supervised - 2011. 2012. presents H mes European Union. European INA , September 10, .” - , May 22,1999. dangers Financial Accessed May

Accessed May news agency, - new - , February .

- - of focus - .

” -

CEU eTD Collection Malazogu,Leon, Todoric.and Vladimir Mac MacDonald, “ Neil. Lynch,Independence; for Calls Mediator Says “U.N. Kosovo Colum. Chief Negotiator “Kosovo “Kosovo: Slight P “Kosovo: Serbs “Kosovo: Serbs Officials Border“Kosovo: Crossings, NATO Turn Reopens Serb “Kosovo:Law Deployed.” EURule ofMission “Kosovo: Tycoon Construction President.” Elected “ “Kosovo, Serbia Kosovo Donald, Neil. “Serbia andDonald, KosovoHold Neil. Talks.” Interest Required. May 19,2015. 24, 2006.Accessed18, 2015. May 2007. Accessed2015. May 19, NeverKosovars, Will Agree Serbian Government onRule.” http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Europe Accessed May 25,2015. International 24, 2015. Distributed 2015. Distributed 2011. International http://wnd.infobaselearning.com/recordurl.aspx?wid=10835&nid=256993&umbtype= May 19,2015. h May http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic December May 5, 2011. Accessed 29,2015. http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic byBBC Europe, Monitoring ttp://wnd.infobaselearning.com/recordurl.aspx?wid=10835&nid=455436&umbtype=0 - - Serbian border d Serbian border Serbia tal 21, 2015.

http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Accessed2015. May 24, , March Resort toRoadBlocks a Remove

Reach DealReach o http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic rogress inTalksrogress w

ks start officially inBrussels. by McC by McC Kosovo launches togainKosovo bid formal independence . .

Distributed Distributed http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic 9,

Barricades a

2011. Accessed May2011. Report preparedReport Relations New for Project Policy the Center onEthnic eal getseal receptions mixed latchy latchy n Customs Stamps, Removingn Customs Barriers Trade

http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic

- - by McC by McC Tribune Business News, Tribune Business News, Tribune ith Serbia ith September s EU Ponders Membership Bid s EUPonders

http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic s Tensions Ri s Tensions Belgrade latchy latchy http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic , No Solution f , NoSolution 21, 2015. - OnFile Facts 6, - ” Tribune BusinessTribune News, Tribune BusinessTribune News, - RTK 2011. Pristina Dialogue: Transformation SelfPristina of 75 .” RTK. trans. BBCEurope. Monitoring Facts On File Financial Times

se Again

TV . . . Accessed May 24, 2015.

. Translated by September December or Border Crossing , December11, 2008.Accessed . .

” ed Back. Adnkronos International Adnkronos , March 10, 2011. , March 10, .

Washington Post,

. , March 9,2011.Accessed ” .” 5, 8, Adnkronos International Adnkronos . Financial Times Financial

2011. 2011. September September August BBC Monitoring ” Adnkronos . ” RTK Accessed May 26, Accessed May s . . 1, ”

. Adnkronos Adnkronos

Accessed Translated 22,

March . .

, July 2011.

0 21, . .

CEU eTD Collection North Atlantic TreatyOrganization. “T Nielson,Nikolaj. “EU Funding for Well Serbia New Policy Center. “Negotiations start to inBrussels.” “NATO Wounded by Soldiers GunfireClash. inKosovo “NATO Morina, Engjellushe. “Cooper’s five Moravcsik, an Andrew, McLaughlin, and Serbia Daniel. toAgree Fail “Kosovo Pact. “ Shqipe, Mjekiji, Lawrence.Marzouk, “NATO inS he2012 tothe European Nobel (E Peace Prize Union http://www.nato.int/docu/update/2003/10 Vienna http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_pri Nobel Me J Accessed May 6,2015. 27, 2011.Accessed21, 2015. May Accessed 25, 2015. http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Europe, 4March 2011.Accessed Enlargement. Accessed May 26, 2 integration/ 2015 from London and Po School ofEconomics breakthrough Accessed May 23, 2015. http://www.cnp.rs/resources/files/dialogue_bg_pr.pdf Kosovo. Pristina/Belgrade: May NovemberAccessed 5,2015. 2011. anuary May 13,2015.Accessed 13,2015. Peacekeepers Injured Peacekeepers inClashes w 2011.

hootou http://www.lexisnex . October Accessed May 15,2003. 18,2015.

Accessed25, 2015. May dia AB 2014. Retrievedfromdia AB 2014.14May 2015, May Kosovo http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/eurocrisispress/2013/04/17/kosovo .

t with KosovoSerbs. t with (IsWay There) Serbia Kosovo? for and AForward

- ” “Kosovo, Serbia,“Kosovo, ReachBreakt deal

C 25, 2015. d Milada Annad Vachudova. enter for for enter - .

Serbia talksand EU integration

015. http://www.cnp.rs/en/articles/view/94 http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/kosovo http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic E is.com/hottopics/lnacademic uropean Danas First Direct BetweenFirst Held Talks Pristina in Belgrade and principles. ” May 21,2015. May .

http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Australian Translated by ith Local ith http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopic S zes/peace/laureates/2012/press.html litical Science, April 17,2013,accessed21May tudies - ” Spent, SaysBudget Watchdog.” EU - Koha Ditore Koha october/e1014a.htm.

https://euobserver.com/enlargement/127187

76 Working Paper, “

hrough Deal.” National Interests,National State Power, and EU Serbs inKosovo. , July

U) . ”

BBCEurope Monitoring ,” Economics Euro Crisis inthePress: Crisis ,” Euro Economics Reut - 29,

Press Release.” ” . . Translatedby

. Irish Times ers 2011.

, November , November Balk 97. (August 2002) . Accessed MayAccessed 24,

”

Irish Times Irish Belgrade: 2013 March an Insight , - April serbia

Nobelprize.org.

BBC Monitoring 29, s/lnacademic . -

. 4, serbia

. - , 2011.

, talks , July 27 February 2013.

November EUobserver

1 - - reach and 4, - 20. 2011. . -

. eu

- . - .

, CEU eTD Collection “Serbia:‘W Tadic “Serbia: Presi “Serbia: ConstitutionAsserts Draft Other KosovoClaim; Developments.” “ “Serbia ABreakFrom and Customary Kosovo: Hostilities.” “Serbia Res and Kosovo Security Report. Council Prentice, Eve Prelec, OrganizationInstituti forand Security Cooperation OfficeDemocratic inEurope for Organization forandKo Security Cooperationin Mission inEurope Organization for “Serbia Kosovo meet and Serbia, Kosovo,Re

Marko. Marko. 26, 2015. Distributed 2015. by McC http://wnd.infobaselearning.com/recordurl.aspx?wid=10835&nid=246128&umbtype=0 October 12,2006. Accessed http://www.economist.com/blogs/easternapproaches/2011/09/ser Accessed May 12,2015. 2011. Accessed 2015. http://www.securitycouncilreport.o 18, 2015. meltdown.aspx http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/europe/balkans/kosovo/north September 1999. Accessed May 1,2015. theOSCE of KosovoFindings October Verification Mission, 1999. 1998toJune Human Rights. May 18,2015. RightsLaw. andRule of http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7249034.stm SerbsNews, accessed inKosovo,” BBCFebruary May 17,2008, 29,2015,

- http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Accessed dent Tadic Sets 6Maydent Elections. for Tadic Date Anne. “Obituary: IbragimAnne. “Obituary: Rugov North Kosovo Meltdown Kosovo North latchy

Security and CooperationSecurity “Distributionof inEurope, ethnic Albanians and http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic http://www.theguardian.com/news/2006/jan/23/guardianobituaries.balkans April May o

6, 2011. Accessed May6, 2011.Accessed 6,2015. by McC n't Recognizeafter EU Ever Kosovo’ Delay. ach Tentativeach Deal onRelations. - Tribune Busine Tribune http://www.osce.org/kosovo/42584?download=true . 21, 2015.

Kosovo/Kosova: As Seen, As Told: an theHumanKosovo/Kosova: AsAnalysisof Rights Seen, AsTold:

27, 2015. 27, 2015. May

ume Talks Boosting on Relations. Kosovo ChronologyofEvents. Accessed MayAccessed 18,2015. in Brussels for EU latchy

25, 2015. 25, Parallel StructuresinKosovo. http://www.bbc.com/news/world http://www.theguardian.com/world/feedarticle/10755910 - Tribune Business News, Tribune http://www.osce.org/odihr/17772?download=true ss News, http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic .

Report preparedInternational forGroup: Crisis the - backed talks. backed a.” a.” March rg/chronology/kosovo.php. Guardian, 77 ”

13, 13, . Associated Press

”

February 27, 2015. AccessedFebruary May27, 2015. 1, Adnkronos International ” 2012.

” December Associated Press Economist, BBC News

January Accessed May 23,2006. .

October 2003.1 ” Accessed May 26, - Adnkronos International Adnkronos . europe

sovo, Department ofHuman 12, ,

, April , bia September 2011. March - 2011. 12672846. 12672846. . Fa - -

and kosovo , cts OnFile

N 20, - - 8, ovember Access 44. Accessed 44. kosovo . 2011.

2013. Distributed - ons and

. ed May ed May . .

Warsaw:

22, . .

CEU eTD Collection Traynor,Ian, “Serbia’s I.Touval, Zartman. Saadia, andWilliam Mediation “Introduction: “ “ Beta.Sot, “High “Serbia Piotr. Smoilar, and KosovoSignAgreement.” Historic Shelley,Fred M. “SerbsI in KosovoReject Serbian Progressive Party. May “CoalitionAgreement.”July 10,2012.Accessed 30,2015. “Serbian Seal C DeniesKosovoCustoms Negotiator “Serb “SerbianBusinessmenImport Ban. Decry Kosovo's “Team Official KosovoRound Discuss Next Chief, EU Timeline: Serbia's troubled pathtalks Timeline: EU Serbia's to accession troubled Leaked Of Text Serbia Of Copy ian Leader'sian C http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Balkans. Inc.,Boulder: Press, Westview 1985. Mediation Theory in andPractice idUSBRE93L0IC20130422 20, 2015. brussels/2496354 May 30,2015, http://www. 23, 2015. 2011. Accessed2015. http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic. May 21, kosovo Accessed 1May 2015from ABC http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic February http://www.sns.org.rs/images/pdf/Sporazum 2015. TranslatedBBC by Monitoring 2015. http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Europe, -

CLIO, 2013.74. http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic - historic July July ” lights from Kosovopress 11.” from 25Mar lights 16,

Nation Shapes: TheStory B Nation http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/22/us Guardian b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2011&mm=07&dd=14&nav_id=75433 onvo 24, 2012. http://www.rferl.org/content/text - Road t Road agreement 2011. 2.html y inKosovo.”Stoned nde Accessed MayAccessed 26,2015. , December pendence, Pristina's Governance.pendence, Pristina's

o EU Accessed 23,2015. May .

- Kosovo Recognition Deal Kosovo Recognition - brussels . http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/apr/30/serbia

m ay

Europe, Europe, 5,

be Blocked tot asbe Checkpoints Return , edited TouvalI. by Saadia Zartman. and William 2011. Accessed May2011. Accessed .

ehind the World's the ehind Borders Reuters September September 78 - ” sns onstitutes ‘Attributeonstitutes Of State’.

Politika

, BBC Monitoring Europe BBC Monitoring .” - - January .” leaked . . . sps

Reuters

Beta

- ,” RFE/RL, April 20,2013,accessed,” RFE/RL, April pups . Translated byBBC Monitoring 2011. . . ” - , -

Guardian copy 26, 2015.

serbia July 8, Christian ScienceMonitor Christian , April 22, 2013.Accessed, AprilMay 22, - js

in Theory.”In 2012. - Accessed24, May

- urs 14 serbia - eu . Santa Barbara, CA: , 2011. , 2011. - 10.07.2 , 30 April 2013. , - Accessed 26, May - kosovo Accessed he , March 28, 012.pdf International ” -

agreement Politika .

May - , .

- .

CEU eTD Collection Zimonjic, SerbiaIndependence.” with VesnaPeric. toHoldFirst Since “Kosovo Talks “Yugoslavia Troop SignsWithdrawal AuthorizesK Kosovo Agreement...U.N. Wright, Returns Robert.“Rugova toHero’s W Alexander.Wendt, “TheAgent Wagstyl, “TalksDueVienna toStartin Stefan. Today Way ClearFinal Could the Political to a “Vucic, Dodik discuss‘ U.N. Security 66 Council, Tweedie, “ Neil. “Vienna Talks on Kosovo Produce“Vienna Kosovo NoResult on Talks http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic Independent http://wnd.infobaselearning.com/recordurl.aspx?wid=10835&nid=473139&umbtype=0 Other Developments.” Accessed May 18,2015. Organization http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic October May 14,2013.Accessed 18,2015. Settlement, Greater Fore http://www.b92.net/eng/news/region.php?yyyy=2015&mm=01&dd=14&nav_id=92857 accessed 1,2015, June 27, 2006.Accessed18, 2015. May S/ inKosovo, Mission Interim Administration Thousands http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new Telegraph

Kosovo War: ThousandsWar: as killed SerbforcesKosovo control triedtokeep ofprovince , March Accessed May 31,2009. 1,2015. - killed , March 7, 2011. Accessed May, March 7,2011. 19,2015. , 41 Bosnia's re EUpath, :3 (August 1987): 335 - as th

- Year, 6534 Serb Facts OnFile Facts - Structure Problem in International in Structure Problem Relations.” Investment andEventualEUM ign http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic - forces th s/worldnews/europe/kosovo/5084374/Kosovo -

tried meeting. http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic lations lations . June 10,1999.Accessed. June - to elcome - – 370.

- Serbian Agency.” keep Report ofthe Secretary 79 in region’,”B92.com, January14,2015,

2011/281.

- .” control Financial Times . .

- of

New York:2011. May 12, - province.html BBC Monitoring Europe BBC Monitoring embership

May 18,2015. , July 16,1999. - General theU.N. on .” oso International . Financial Times Financial

. vo Force;

- War

- . , July

. .” .” .